Message from discussion
"Anne" Exposes Herself Yet Again WAS: Jewish World Plan - does it exist?
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.african.american,soc.motss,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.flame.faggots,alt.flame.fucking.faggots
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!pln-w!extra.newsguy.com!lotsanews.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!john1
From: jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Subject: Re: "Anne" Exposes Herself Yet Again WAS: Jewish World Plan - does it exist?
Expires: Wed, 30 Dec 2037 22:58:21 GMT
Organization: Johns & Call Girls United Against Repression
Message-ID: <GosK65.39JoD@world.std.com>
References: <7ba4864a.0112152330.2d19169e@posting.google.com> <3C214C88.7D97E50C@hers.com> <7ba4864a.0112201617.8d95efc@posting.google.com> <3C229552.B445F943@hers.com> <7ba4864a.0112202326.71bb6ae5@posting.google.com> <3C235289.E4B10E98@hers.com> <7ba4864a.0112211118.6594c4b3@posting.google.com> <3C239A3F.951C5ABE@hers.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 10:08:29 GMT
Lines: 399
Jewish-American Princess Susan Cohen <fla...@his.com> writes:
>The definitive exposing happens with the use of
>the word "race", toward the bottom of the post.
>anne wrote:
>> > It would be sad if you really believed this.
>> > No, you're insisting that there's actual evidence for it,
>> > which there is not.
>> > That is not "just asking a question".
>>
>> If its evidence you want, why not try starting with the extremely long
>> article in www.cis.org written by Stephen Steinlight about how the US
>> immigration policy is likely to shake the Jewish stranglehold on
>> american politics if it is not changed soon, because third world
>> immigrants cannot be bamboozled with "Holocaust guilt"...???
>This is not evidence, honey, it's one jerk's stupid opinion.
>"Jewish Stranglehold on American Politics"? That was *your*
>addition to his drivel, and it's as laughable as anything else
>you've come up with.
>This is what we mean by "no evidence."
>> http://www.cis.org/articles/2001/back1301.html
>[snip quotes of one person's personal opinion, not backed by facts]
>> > Most people *do* trade insults for insults.
>>
>> Maybe face to face in the real world,
>Maybe. But definitely on Usenet. People who normally wouldn't
>dare say "boo" to anyone get rather beligerent on Usenet. I,
>OTOH, am more restrained on Usenet than I would be in real
>life. For instance, I don't use the language others do here, because
>I am aware of it's being a public forum
Rstrained, you say? Do you, in real life, go around calling people:
"asshole" as you very recently called me in one of your many hate-filled
diatribes you have recently posted about me.
>> but this is the contrived
>> environment of a news group, where you have a chance to cool off
>> before you post.
>But you're assuming that your sleazy bigotry (as further revealed in this
>very post) deserves consideration, and, G-d forbid, even respect!
>And, I assure you "heated" is hardly the word for the way I feel. Your
>type is extremely common in here, & is easily disposed of without even
>breaking a sweat.
>> If you read what you construe to be an insult, I
>> suggest you log off,
>If you consider anything you post *not* to be an insult, I suggest you
>get your head examined.
>> go for a walk, come back and then post.
>If I were to "log off & come back", I would probably come up with a
>*lot* more to say that you'd like even less, so keep your brainless
>condescension to yourself
>> Maybe then your posts will be rational,
>Except, of course, that my posts are the already the only rational ones
>between the two of us. A semblence of clalm such as you are
>parading, does not equate with "rational."
>> instead of "in the heat of the moment"...
>Hardly "in the heat of the moment." Just a quick reaction
>to the same old garbage we see here all the time.
>> > I don't discuss things that aren't worthy of dicsussion.
>>
>> Terrific. Why did you post to a discussion group then?
>First off, this is a "newsgroup." There is no mandate to discuss anything.
>Secondly, I am as free to counter your lies as you are to post them.
>To you, this does not constitute discussion. Fine. I don't care what you
>think of it. I am simply going to do so because it is the right thing to do.
>> Why not just feel all indignant for a second,
>Indignant? Well, that *is* a justifable response to outrageous lies.
>> and then post to a thread you
>> actually want to contribute something to?
>I realize that you are desperately afraid of the truth, but this will
>*not* make me go away. Whenever you post a lie, I, or someone
>like me, will be there to correct you. And in the manner you
>deserve, whether you like it or not. In fact, if you don't like it, so
>much the better.
>> > why don't you just admit that you're a Jew-hating phnoy and *then*
>> > push off?
>>
>> Jew hater?
>Yes. Very good. You got it right the first time.
>> Don't you mean "racist"?
>No, of course not.
>> Isn't that the word usually used
>> to paralyse any discussion of race?
>Only a bigot would assume we were discussing race.
>Thank you for exposing yourself far better than I ever could.
>Now you see why no one has to get "heated" over the like of you.
>> I'm no Jew hater.
>Then why do you automatically believe any lie about Jews that you find floating
>around?
>> If anything, I'm a Jew lover.
Where have I heard that before? Jesse Jackson, the anti-Jewish bigot was
interviewed on "60 Minutes" a couple of years ago. He did NOT say that
some of his best friends are Jews. What he did say was that some of his
SONS' best friends are Jews.
Then there was Rod Swift, the notorious homosexual Nazi from Australia.
Here is some material from my extensive archives:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From alt.callahans Thu May 4 05:13:29 2000
Xref: world alt.callahans:526555 alt.gossip.royalty:142481
alt.talk.royalty:153851 soc.culture.jewish:653499
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish,alt.callahans,alt.gossip.royalty,
alt.talk.royalty,alt.flame.fucking.faggots
Path: world!john1
From: jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Subject: Re: TROLL ALERT was Re: Nazis, Pt. 1
Message ID: <Ftyqnt....@world.std.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 02:52:41 GMT
References: <38ff6ed402_...@cnx.com> <Ftqp1x....@world.std.com>
<8ecv2r$pn...@nnrp1.deja.com> <FtuHJH....@world.std.com>
<Ftw62C....@world.std.com> <390E3F8A.1440F...@bellsouth.net>
Organization: The World, Public Access Internet, Brookline, MA
Lines: 227
Status: RO
X-Status:
In Message-ID: <390E3F8A.1440F...@bellsouth.net>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish,alt.callahans,alt.gossip.royalty,
alt.talk.royalty,alt.flame.fucking.faggots
Subject: TROLL ALERT was Re: Nazis, Pt. 1
Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 19:38:02 -0700
Christopher Jahn <xj...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Hey everbody! It's a TROLL!! And don't forget to TRIM YOUR
> HEADERS!!!
>
> Troll troll troll troll trollTroll troll troll troll trollTroll
> troll troll troll trollTroll troll troll troll trollTroll troll
> troll troll trollTroll troll troll troll trollTroll troll troll
> troll trollTroll troll troll troll trollTroll troll troll troll
> trollTroll troll troll troll trollTroll troll troll troll
> trollTroll troll troll troll trollTroll troll troll troll troll
An entire paragraph with nothing but the word "troll" repeated sixty-five
times. This homonazi Christopher Jahn is obviously a believer in the
Goebbels Nazi technique of the "big lie", continuously repeated.
> Freddy is a little Troll
> Who has a filthy mouth
> What he lacks in decency
> he makes up by talking loud
This homonazi Christopher Jahn accuses me of having a filthy mouth. All I
am doing is repeating the material that his NAMBLA friends have posted.
Here is another example of a homonazi NAMBLA supporter. This other homonazi
NAMBLA supporter is the notorious Australian, Rod Swift.
Rod Swift, among other things, used to be one of the moderators of the
moderated newsgroup soc.support.youth.gay-lesbian-bi. While he was one of
the moderators he used his position to seduce a homosexual youth by the
name of Chris Hughes.
Anyway, here is the proof that Swift was indeed a homonazi. This is a
direct transcript of Swift's own words.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: zel...@oak.math.ucla.edu (Michael Zeleny)
Newsgroups: talk.philosophy.misc,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Nazis like Us
Date: 14 Mar 1995 22:16:42 GMT
Organization: ptyx
Lines: 47
Expires: April 30, 1995
Messag ID: <3k54ka$...@saba.info.ucla.edu>
References: <3k2q0n$...@decaxp.harvard.edu> <3k37m2$...@saba.info.ucla.edu>
<3k4v0f$...@fohnix.metronet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: oak.math.ucla.edu
Xref: panix talk.philosophy.misc:26277 alt.politics.homosexuality:74505
alt.revisionism:27052
Status: RO
X-Status:
b...@fohnix.metronet.com (Rod Swift) writes:
: zel...@oak.math.ucla.edu (Michael Zeleny) writes:
MZ:
:::: "You're the type of Jew that gave Hitler some justification for
:::: his genocide, I'm sure." -- Rod Swift
TK:
::: What is the Moral One's expert opinion on this?
MZ:
:: No comment.
RS:
: Is it because it is so POORLY transcribed from the original post,
The transcription is faithful down to the line break.
RS:
: or the fact that it has completely lost it's context?
Context restored:
_______________________________________________________W___________________
In article <3jncve$...@fohnix.metronet.com>
b...@fohnix.metronet.com (Rod Swift) writes:
>In article <3jmk1k$...@saba.info.ucla.edu>
>zel...@oak.math.ucla.edu (Michael Zeleny) writes:
>>I am a Jewish philosopher, not a Japanese monk. Consider the precedents
>>recorded in the books of the Prophets.
>You're the type of Jew that gave Hitler some justification for
>his genocide, I'm sure.
___________________________________________________________________________
In the future, Swift's intellectual credibility should be measured
against his former Holocaust apologetics and his present attempts to
disclaim responsibility for his statements.
Cordially, - Mikhail | Why is it that all those who have become eminent
Zel...@math.ucla.edu | in philosophy or politics or poetry or art
UCLA Philosophy Dept | are clearly of an atrabilious temperament?
_____________________|_________________________________________________
|"Fuck your ass with broken glass!" -- Gene Ward Smith| don't
|"You're the type of Jew that gave Hitler some justification for| tread
| his genocide, I'm sure." -- Rod Swift| on me
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Now, here is an example of a filthy mouth from the same homonazi Swift.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: c...@opera.iinet.net.au (Rod Swift)
Newsgroups: alt.censorship,alt.homosexual,alt.politics.homosexuality,
alt.sex,soc.men,soc.women,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.mens-rights,soc.motss,
soc.culture.jewish,uva.general,comp.org.eff.talk,soc.singles,talk.rumors,
alt.christnet,alt.christnet.sex,alt.christnet.second-coming.real-soon-now,
alt.atheism
Subject: Re: Women own rape issues, so Shut Up, Fag
(was Re: Conveying the idea)
Date: 20 Dec 1995 23:01:43 +0800
Organization: iiNet Technologies
Lines: 71
Distribution: inet
Messag -ID: <4b98gn$...@opera.iinet.net.au>
References: <Pine.SV4.3.91.951213151125.14061F-100000@curly>
<4asavp$...@news.next.com> <Pine.SV4.3.91.951215165626.2877B-100000@larry>
<john1.819206442@earth>
NNTP-Posting-Host: opera.iinet.net.au
Status: RO
X-Status:
jo...@usa.net (Fred Cherry) lies, yet again:
>Well, now, Gwendolyn darling, I have been threatened with homosexual rape
>by someone at the University of Virginia.
This is a lie. Someone suggested to Fred Cherry that he could do
with a dick up his ass -- consentually. The poster did not
suggest he'd PERSONALLY do it with Fred.
>When I protested, I was deluged
>with an avalanche of responses to the effect that homosexual rape would be
>an educational experience for me. Here is one example, posted by the
>notorious homonazi and woman-hater Rod Swift:
This is another lie. I posted a message suggesting that the idea
that a *huge* dick up your ass would be therapeutic in nature,
and I didn't suggest that you should have the therapeutic
procedure carried out non-consentually.... This is evident by my
statements below, which give no endorsement for homosexual rape
fo your decrepit and filthy old corpse-with-pulse.
>-------------------------------snip------------------------------------
>From: c...@opera.iinet.net.au (Rod Swift)
>Someone asking an honest question of an old fart like Fred Cherry :)
>So Fred.... Any hunky guys been interested in picking up your
>decrepit and rotting ol' body lately?
>It's obvious you have not made fair critical use of his post :)
>Copyright breach! :) I think he'd win given your atrocious loss
>record in court cases!
>Actually, it's a gay and lesbian business guide. And I don't
>believe where I spend my money discriminates against straights.
>Or are you just pissed off that there's no SlutYellowPages?
>For Johns...
>Too chicken-shit to give us your home address, Fred? Don't you
>know that serving of writs requires that?
>Then again, I know where you live. A simple check of a number of
>records gives me that :)
>...yet. I've got t e writs right here. I'll be in New York
>in February. I hope to be able to give your wheelchair a big
>push in the direction of court soon, you decrepit and feeble old moron.
>Hey Fred, I think you need a big dick up your ass soon, to clear
>out all that shit that's backlogged into your brain.
>-------------------------------------snip------------------------------
>Now, Gwendolyn dear, would you be so kind as to tell us all your opinion of
>this?
It's Fred Cherry, with that backlog of shit going in and
infecting his brain, getting it wrong yet again, but of course.
Love,
Rod
P.S.: Fred, when you going to undergo that therapy for your
butthole blockage?
--
| ... ..... | Hey Fred (Cherry), I think ya |*******|
| + + + + + + + + |need a big dick up your ass soon,| ***** |
| * * * * * * * * |to clear out all that shit that's| *** |
|R o d S w i f t| backlogged into your brain!!! | * |
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I would like to point out that Swift had a better lawyer than David Irving.
Swift's lawyer warned him not so sue me for libel, because if he had done
so, he would surely have lost the case. Also, Swift's statement that I am
in a wheelchair is just wishful thinking.
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Grand Duke of Yugoslobia
Duke of Vulgaria
Grand Muff-Diver of Jerusalem
& Elector of Homophobia
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Later on I got into a heated discussion with Swift concerning Ernst Roehm,
the homosexual leader of the S.A. Swift, using homosexual logic, managed
to convince his many homosexual admirers that HE was a lover of Jews and
that *I* was a Nazi.
>I'm sure that some of your best friends are Jewish.
>You all say that, in one form or another.
>> All I did was ask a question!
>So if we were to ask you what makes you think you're not a bigot,
>despite all the tons of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you
>won't be insulted? That's nice to know.
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Grand Duke of Yugoslobia
Duke of Vulgaria
Grand Muff-Diver of Jerusalem
& Elector of Homophobia