Re: McCain Lampoons the Gender Wage Gap Myth
Dr. Lippschitz
"MCP" <gf010...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:M6QWj.10727$Pp2....@newsfe10.ams2...
> http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/05/14/mccain-lampoons-the-gender-wage-gap-myth/
>
> Carey Roberts
>
> Ready for a morning chuckle to jump-start your day? Pay a visit to Hillary
> Clinton's website that claims with a straight face, "Women still earn
> significantly less money than men for doing the same jobs."
> [www.hillaryclinton.com/video/13.aspx]
>
> The first part of Hillary's sentence is true - women indeed earn less than
> men.
> But the last four words - "for doing the same jobs" - is as laughable as
> Hillary's
> dodging-sniper-bullets-in-Bosnia tale.
>
> Let's say you have a job opening and two persons apply who have identical
> skills
> and qualifications. Joe wants to be paid the prevailing wage, while Jackie
> says
> she is willing to work for only 77 cents on the dollar.
>
> Who would you hire? Jackie, of course.
>
> So if women are doing exactly the same work as men and getting paid 23%
> less,
> every profit-maximizing entrepreneur would hire only women. But last I
> heard,
> men are still getting jobs. Obviously there's something wrong with the
> gender
> wage gap theory.
>
> Last month Senator McCain was campaigning in the hard-scrabble coal fields
> of
> Kentucky. He commented that if women want to overcome the gender wage gap,
> they
> would need more "education and training." And knowing that Women's Studies
> grads
> might not realize that coal mining is the economic mainstay of the region,
> McCain then deadpanned, "traditionally, women have not gone into that line
> of
> work."
>
> But the Funny-Fems reflexively insist the culprit is sex discrimination,
> not
> women exercising the right to choose their preferred work. So when they
> heard
> Senator McCain's comments, they flew into a purple-passion rage. Within
> days
> MoveOn rolled out its propaganda machine, making the claim that "Study
> after
> study has shown that women are paid less than men for the same work."
They're full of shit. In fact, females are overpaid for what they do. I
think we're going to have to get really tough with these bitches who spread
this disinformation. The problem with men is that they're too soft and kind
and females take this as a sign of weakness which it's their Nature to
exploit. Never argue with a female or try to use logic. If a female tries to
spout this feminist bullshit, shout her down or disrupt their little
bullshit fest. If they march bomb them with rotten eggs or horseshit. See if
they'll march again lol Females will only engage in this bullshit if it's
safe or they have some girly man like a cop protecting their little
feelings. Once it gets tough they all turn into helpless confused little
girls(which is what they are) just as Hillary did in the debates.
>
> That's good for another belly laugh, of course, because in eastern
> Kentucky, the
> best paying jobs go to the sooty-faced men who are willing to descend 900
> feet
> into the ground and hope a boulder doesn't break loose from the mine roof.
> That's
> what happened to Cornelius Yates, who was crushed to death in a Kentucky
> coal
> mine in January 2006.
>
> Yates' death came just a week after 12 miners were killed in a West
> Virginia
> mine explosion. And that followed a year in which nine miners died
> throughout
> Kentucky.
Oh, and let me remind you that these are in modern mines today with all
sorts of safety precautions. Imagine what it was like years ago.
>
> Not surprisingly, women are not very interested in doing hazardous jobs
> that may
> send them to the grave. Indeed study after study has shown that when
> differences
> in the type of work, hours on the job, and education are accounted for,
> women
> are treated fairly.
Fairly? They are overpaid for what they do. 95% of females have jobs you can
train a 14yo girl to do.
>
> Actually, women may be doing better than men. According to the National
> Association of Colleges and Employers, in many fields female college grads
> are
> being offered higher starting salaries than their male counterparts.
>
> Female physicists are getting $6,500 more. Co-eds who majored in petroleum
> engineering are being offered $4,400 more. And women computer programmers
> are
> being enticed with $7,200 extra pay. In fact for dozens of majors and
> occupations, women coming out of college are getting better offers than
> men,
> reveals Warren Farrell in his book, Why Men Earn More.
Very few females are interested in working. Work to a female is like
socialising and the higher the position they get just means that they are in
contact with wealthier men which is their whole objective.
>
> Why these disparities? Because in traditionally male-dominated
> professions,
> employers are willing to ante up more greenbacks to attract females in
> order to
> forestall a costly discrimination lawsuit.
>
> So once again the radical left is caught red-handed, trying to push a
> socialist
> scheme that centralizes bureaucratic control and weakens free markets.
> That's
> the approach that brought the Soviet economy to its knees 20 years ago.
>
> The Sisters of Silliness are out of touch with the needs of women. By
> scorning
> the notion of education and disempowering women, they prove they are
> trying to
> force women into a dependency relationship at the porcine foot-stool of
> the
> government trough.
>
MCP
"Dr. Lippschitz" <lipps...@theclinic.uni> wrote in message
news:f%0Xj.3747$xr1.458@trndny04...
IOW they shag themselves to the top.
Merton Lippschitz
news:f%0Xj.3747$xr1.458@trndny04...
>
IOW they shag themselves to the top.
>
>
>
>
>>