Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
HACKERS: LIKE THE CONCEPT OF GOD, THE FEW CONTROL OR DESTROY THE MANY
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Aviroce
Feb 10, 2012, 10:43:09 PM2/10/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
HACKERS: LIKE THE CONCEPT OF GOD, THE FEW CONTROL OR DESTROY THE MANY
By Aviroce
You brought a very good observation which I extrapolate into the
"Future Wars Are Now."
Man has been developing weapons, social as well as mechanical, to have
power at the tip of his fingers. Socially man created the concept of
god so that the few control the many. Jews, however athiests they
are, encourage religion so that christians of almost two billions and
Muslims of almost one and a half billion, to be controlled by the
fifteen million Jews as the ideology expounded is rooted in Jew myth
and Jew ambition to control the world to establish the kingdom of Zion
where non-Jews are beasts or non-human. We had swords to cut down on
manhandling of an enemy. The swords became eventually guns to kill
without much effort and exterminate the many by the few. Bombs of
different kinds serve the same purpose. Look and behorld, war has
changed. It moved from ground to ground, and air to ground to air to
air to ground. Air to air to ground is the final frontier, And this
is controlled from computers on the ground. To destroy a country, all
you need is to decode their secret codes. If you saw the movie
"Swordfish" you would be fascinated by the decoder who really holds
more power than the man with the gun.. I pray to see those hackers
get into Israel's defense system and order one or two nuclear bombs
detonated in place and let the chain reaction take its course. Ashes
to ashes. They all fall down.
Aviroce
By Aviroce
You brought a very good observation which I extrapolate into the
"Future Wars Are Now."
Man has been developing weapons, social as well as mechanical, to have
power at the tip of his fingers. Socially man created the concept of
god so that the few control the many. Jews, however athiests they
are, encourage religion so that christians of almost two billions and
Muslims of almost one and a half billion, to be controlled by the
fifteen million Jews as the ideology expounded is rooted in Jew myth
and Jew ambition to control the world to establish the kingdom of Zion
where non-Jews are beasts or non-human. We had swords to cut down on
manhandling of an enemy. The swords became eventually guns to kill
without much effort and exterminate the many by the few. Bombs of
different kinds serve the same purpose. Look and behorld, war has
changed. It moved from ground to ground, and air to ground to air to
air to ground. Air to air to ground is the final frontier, And this
is controlled from computers on the ground. To destroy a country, all
you need is to decode their secret codes. If you saw the movie
"Swordfish" you would be fascinated by the decoder who really holds
more power than the man with the gun.. I pray to see those hackers
get into Israel's defense system and order one or two nuclear bombs
detonated in place and let the chain reaction take its course. Ashes
to ashes. They all fall down.
Aviroce
mirjam
Feb 10, 2012, 11:18:03 PM2/10/12
to
mirjam
SHOWS THROWER
Feb 11, 2012, 7:24:04 AM2/11/12
to
"Aviroce" wrote in message
news:4a321f35-7ad9-4df8...@18g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
> HACKERS: LIKE THE CONCEPT OF GOD, THE FEW CONTROL OR DESTROY THE MANY
> By Aviroce
>
> You brought a very good observation which I extrapolate into the
> "Future Wars Are Now."
> Man has been developing weapons, social as well as mechanical, to have
> power at the tip of his fingers. Socially man created the concept of
> god so that the few control the many. Jews, however atheists they
> are, encourage religion so that Christians of almost two billions and
Truly "Israel" existence is absolute wrong, this corruptor, thief, tyrant,
occupier, terrorist and cancer has no right to live on the Palestinian land,
it will always meet refusal regardless of the reconciliation, recognitions
and surrenders!!
news:4a321f35-7ad9-4df8...@18g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
> HACKERS: LIKE THE CONCEPT OF GOD, THE FEW CONTROL OR DESTROY THE MANY
> By Aviroce
>
> You brought a very good observation which I extrapolate into the
> "Future Wars Are Now."
> Man has been developing weapons, social as well as mechanical, to have
> power at the tip of his fingers. Socially man created the concept of
> are, encourage religion so that Christians of almost two billions and
> Muslims of almost one and a half billion, to be controlled by the
> fifteen million Jews as the ideology expounded is rooted in Jew myth
> and Jew ambition to control the world to establish the kingdom of Zion
> where non-Jews are beasts or non-human. We had swords to cut down on
> manhandling of an enemy. The swords became eventually guns to kill
> without much effort and exterminate the many by the few. Bombs of
> different kinds serve the same purpose. Look and behold, war has
> fifteen million Jews as the ideology expounded is rooted in Jew myth
> and Jew ambition to control the world to establish the kingdom of Zion
> where non-Jews are beasts or non-human. We had swords to cut down on
> manhandling of an enemy. The swords became eventually guns to kill
> without much effort and exterminate the many by the few. Bombs of
> changed. It moved from ground to ground, and air to ground to air to
> air to ground. Air to air to ground is the final frontier, And this
> is controlled from computers on the ground. To destroy a country, all
> you need is to decode their secret codes. If you saw the movie
> "Swordfish" you would be fascinated by the decoder who really holds
> more power than the man with the gun.. I pray to see those hackers
> get into Israel's defense system and order one or two nuclear bombs
> detonated in place and let the chain reaction take its course. Ashes
> to ashes. They all fall down.
>
> Aviroce
* Israel has no legal, religious, or historical right in Palestine
> air to ground. Air to air to ground is the final frontier, And this
> is controlled from computers on the ground. To destroy a country, all
> you need is to decode their secret codes. If you saw the movie
> "Swordfish" you would be fascinated by the decoder who really holds
> more power than the man with the gun.. I pray to see those hackers
> get into Israel's defense system and order one or two nuclear bombs
> detonated in place and let the chain reaction take its course. Ashes
> to ashes. They all fall down.
>
> Aviroce
Truly "Israel" existence is absolute wrong, this corruptor, thief, tyrant,
occupier, terrorist and cancer has no right to live on the Palestinian land,
it will always meet refusal regardless of the reconciliation, recognitions
and surrenders!!
Aviroce
Feb 12, 2012, 4:14:47 PM2/12/12
to
How can the many destroy the most equipped few when the few can just
throw few nuclear bombs on the millions of Palestinians, Arabs and
Muslims and get away with it because the most powerful fool country of
USA supports their evil? When it gets down to "Kill or be killed" it
is all right to take the final step. Hell! Why not? I have not seen
more evil people than Jews.
> mirjam- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
throw few nuclear bombs on the millions of Palestinians, Arabs and
Muslims and get away with it because the most powerful fool country of
USA supports their evil? When it gets down to "Kill or be killed" it
is all right to take the final step. Hell! Why not? I have not seen
more evil people than Jews.
>
> - Show quoted text -
jwshe...@satx.rr.com
Feb 12, 2012, 8:36:56 PM2/12/12
to
Thomas S. McCall, Th.D.
Dr. Thomas McCall, the Senior Theologian of our ministry, has written
many articles for the Levitt Letter. He holds a Th.M. in Old Testament
studies and a Th.D. in Semitic languages and Old Testament. He has
served as Zola’s co-author, mentor, pastor, and friend for nearly 30
years.
This article appeared originally in the December 1997 Levitt Letter.
Page Contents (skip contents)
Propaganda Use
Biblical Use
History of the Term
Christian Adoption
Proper Designation
During the last few centuries, the world, Christians included, has
fallen into a bad habit. We have bought into some early Roman
propaganda. We have used the name Palestine, which Roman Emperor
Hadrian placed on the country of Israel in 135 A.D., for so long that
it has become common usage. This would be as incorrect as calling the
Russia of today the “Soviet Union” or referring to Berlin as “East
Germany.” The thoughts below by our ministry’s senior theologian, Dr.
Thomas S. McCall, completely explore the subject. If you know somebody
who’s fallen into this habit, please share this article with them.
— Zola
Current Propaganda’s Use of Palestine
There is a propaganda war going on now with regard to the term
“Palestine.” At one time it might have been argued that Palestine was
an innocuous designation of the Middle Eastern area, that is generally
thought of as the Holy Land. During the last few decades, however, the
term Palestine has been adopted by Arabs living in Israel in the area
west of the Jordan River. It is specifically employed to avoid the use
of the name Israel, and must be considered an anti-Israel term. In all
Arab maps published in Jordan, Egypt, etc., the area west of the
Jordan River is called Palestine, without any reference to Israel.
Palestine is the term now used by those who want to deny the
legitimate existence of Israel as a genuine nation among the family of
nations.
The term now adopted by the political entity within Israel that is
gradually obtaining more and more pockets of territory through the
“peace process,” is “the PA (Palestinian Authority). Although it must
deal daily with Israeli officials, the PA hates to use the term Israel
in any of its communications.
Palestine, therefore, must now be considered a political propaganda
term with massive anti-Israel implications. The world press uses the
term to question the legitimacy of modern Israel. Christians also have
used the term Palestine for centuries in referring to the Holy Land.
In earlier times this might have been excused (although biblically
questionable) because of its common usage. In light of the current
propaganda war against Israel, however, Christians must now re-
evaluate the term Palestine and consider whether it is biblically,
theologically or prophetically accurate.
Biblical Use of Palestine
The term Palestine is rarely used in the Old Testament, and when it
is, it refers specifically to the southwestern coastal area of Israel
occupied by the Philistines. It is a translation of the Hebrew word
“Pelesheth.” The term is never used to refer to the whole land
occupied by Israel. Before Israel occupied the land, it would be
generally accurate to say that the southwestern coastal area was
called Philistia (the Way of the Philistines, or Palestine), while the
central highlands were called Canaan. Both the Canaanites and the
Philistines had disappeared as distinct peoples at least by the time
of the Babylonian Captivity of Judea (586 B.C.), and they no longer
exist.
In the New Testament, the term Palestine is never used. The term
Israel is primarily used to refer to the people of Israel, rather than
the Land. However, in at least two passages, Israel is used to refer
to the Land:
Saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and go into
the land of Israel: for they are dead who sought the young child’s
life. And he arose, and took the young child and his mother, and came
into the land of Israel. (Matt. 2:20-21)
But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for
verily I say to you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel,
till the Son of man shall have come. (Matt. 10:23)
The first passage is when Joseph, Mary and Jesus returned from Egypt
to Israel, and the second has reference to the proclamation of the
Gospel throughout the Land of Israel. Jesus, Matthew and the angel
speaking to Joseph use the term Israel with reference to the Land,
even though the term was not then recognized by the Roman authorities.
It is clear, then, that the Bible never uses the term Palestine to
refer to the Holy Land as a whole, and that Bible maps that refer to
Palestine in the Old or New Testament are, at best, inaccurate, and,
at worst, are a conscious denial of the biblical name of Israel.
History of the Term Palestine
Where did the term Palestine originate from? How did the world and the
church get into the habit of calling the land of Israel “Palestine”?
One of the guides we use in our tours to Israel is Zvi Rivai, an
Israeli Messianic believer, who has done considerable research on this
subject. Zvi informs us that before 135 A.D., the Romans used the
terms Judea and Galilee to refer to the Land of Israel. When Titus
destroyed Jerusalem in 70 A.D., the Roman government struck a coin
with the phrase “Judea Capta,” meaning Judea has been captured. The
term Palestine was never used in the early Roman designations.
It was not until the Romans crushed the second Jewish revolt against
Rome in 135 A.D. under Bar Kochba that Emperor Hadrian applied the
term Palestine to the Land of Israel. Hadrian, like many dictators
since his time realized the propaganda power of terms and symbols. He
replaced the shrines of the Jewish Temple and the Sepulchre of Christ
in Jerusalem with temples to pagan deities. He changed the name of
Jerusalem to Aelia Capitalina, and changed the name of Israel and
Judea to Palestine. Hadrian’s selection of Palestine was purposeful,
not accidental. He took the name of the ancient enemies of Israel, the
Philistines, Latinized it to Palestine, and applied it to the Land of
Israel. He hoped to erase the name Israel from all memory. Thus, the
term Palestine as applied to the Land of Israel was invented by the
inveterate enemy of the Bible and the Jewish people, Emperor Hadrian.
It is interesting to note that the original Philistines were not
Middle Eastern at all. They were European peoples from the Adriatic
sea next to Greece. It may have pleased Hadrian to utilize this
Hellenistic term for the Jewish land. In any case, the original
“Palestinians” had nothing to do, whatsoever, with any Arabs.
Christian Adoption of the Term Palestine
One of the first Christian uses of the term Palestine is found in the
works of the Church historian Eusebius, who lived in Caesarea. He
wrote around 300 A.D., as the Roman persecution of Christians was
ending and the Emperor Constantine began to accept Christianity as
legal. Eusebius did not accept Hadrian’s designation of Jerusalem as
Aelia Capitalina, but he did use Hadrian’s term Palestine. Eusebius
considered himself to be one of the bishops of Palestine. Thus, the
anti-Israel, anti-Christian name of Palestine was assimilated into the
Church’s vocabulary as the Byzantine Empire was being established.
The Church has, since that time, broadly used the term Palestine in
literature and in maps to refer to the Land of Israel. It should be
noted, however, that the Crusaders called their land the Kingdom of
Jerusalem. When the British received the mandate after World War I,
though, they called the land on both sides of the Jordan River,
Palestine. This became the accepted geo-political term for several
decades, and those who lived in the land were called Palestinians,
whether they were Jews, Arabs or Europeans.
Even evangelical Christians who believe in the future of Israel have
used the term Palestine. The New Scofield Reference Edition of the
Bible has maps in the back entitled “Palestine under the Herods.”
There never was a Palestine under the Herods. This is a serious
misidentification. It would be something like looking at a modern map
of Texas and having it titled “Mexico in the Twentieth Century.”
The MacArthur Study Bible published just last year contains a map
called “Palestine in Christ’s Time” There are numerous references in
the notes to something called first-century Palestine.
It appears that Bible-believing Christians have either knowingly or
unwittingly followed the world, pagans and haters of Israel in calling
Israel by the anti-Israel term Palestine. It is found throughout Bible
maps, Bible commentaries and textbooks.
Proper Designation of the Land
The use of the term Palestine was biblically inaccurate and wrong
throughout the Church age. However, it is more than just wrong, it is
devastating in our time, when the term Palestine is the cornerstone of
the propaganda war against Israel and the Jewish people. Do we want to
use terms invented by those who hate Christ, the Bible and Israel? Do
we want to utilize terms used by the enemies of Israel who desire to
accomplish nothing less than the destruction of the Jewish people? I
think not.
Christians should use the terminology of the Bible wherever possible.
Why not go back to the terms used in the New Testament? The Gospel
writers used the term Israel to refer to the Land. Why should we use
any other term when referring to the Land, especially now that the
Jews are back in the Land and have re-established the nation of Israel
among the family of nations?
As we draw closer to the Second Coming of Christ, we should understand
that Satan’s fury against the Church and Israel will grow
exponentially. Satan hates the Gospel of the crucified and risen
Messiah, and he hates the reality of the restoration of Israel as the
nation that will ultimately receive Jesus as the Messiah at His
return, and the nation that will be Christ’s earthly headquarters. The
only term we should use for the Land is Israel, or its subdivisions of
Judea, Samaria, and Galilee. We should make every effort to remove the
term Palestine from our Bible maps and textbooks, and use only
biblical terms with reference to the Holy Land of Israel.
http://www.levitt.com/essays/palestine
Dr. Thomas McCall, the Senior Theologian of our ministry, has written
many articles for the Levitt Letter. He holds a Th.M. in Old Testament
studies and a Th.D. in Semitic languages and Old Testament. He has
served as Zola’s co-author, mentor, pastor, and friend for nearly 30
years.
This article appeared originally in the December 1997 Levitt Letter.
Page Contents (skip contents)
Propaganda Use
Biblical Use
History of the Term
Christian Adoption
Proper Designation
During the last few centuries, the world, Christians included, has
fallen into a bad habit. We have bought into some early Roman
propaganda. We have used the name Palestine, which Roman Emperor
Hadrian placed on the country of Israel in 135 A.D., for so long that
it has become common usage. This would be as incorrect as calling the
Russia of today the “Soviet Union” or referring to Berlin as “East
Germany.” The thoughts below by our ministry’s senior theologian, Dr.
Thomas S. McCall, completely explore the subject. If you know somebody
who’s fallen into this habit, please share this article with them.
— Zola
Current Propaganda’s Use of Palestine
There is a propaganda war going on now with regard to the term
“Palestine.” At one time it might have been argued that Palestine was
an innocuous designation of the Middle Eastern area, that is generally
thought of as the Holy Land. During the last few decades, however, the
term Palestine has been adopted by Arabs living in Israel in the area
west of the Jordan River. It is specifically employed to avoid the use
of the name Israel, and must be considered an anti-Israel term. In all
Arab maps published in Jordan, Egypt, etc., the area west of the
Jordan River is called Palestine, without any reference to Israel.
Palestine is the term now used by those who want to deny the
legitimate existence of Israel as a genuine nation among the family of
nations.
The term now adopted by the political entity within Israel that is
gradually obtaining more and more pockets of territory through the
“peace process,” is “the PA (Palestinian Authority). Although it must
deal daily with Israeli officials, the PA hates to use the term Israel
in any of its communications.
Palestine, therefore, must now be considered a political propaganda
term with massive anti-Israel implications. The world press uses the
term to question the legitimacy of modern Israel. Christians also have
used the term Palestine for centuries in referring to the Holy Land.
In earlier times this might have been excused (although biblically
questionable) because of its common usage. In light of the current
propaganda war against Israel, however, Christians must now re-
evaluate the term Palestine and consider whether it is biblically,
theologically or prophetically accurate.
Biblical Use of Palestine
The term Palestine is rarely used in the Old Testament, and when it
is, it refers specifically to the southwestern coastal area of Israel
occupied by the Philistines. It is a translation of the Hebrew word
“Pelesheth.” The term is never used to refer to the whole land
occupied by Israel. Before Israel occupied the land, it would be
generally accurate to say that the southwestern coastal area was
called Philistia (the Way of the Philistines, or Palestine), while the
central highlands were called Canaan. Both the Canaanites and the
Philistines had disappeared as distinct peoples at least by the time
of the Babylonian Captivity of Judea (586 B.C.), and they no longer
exist.
In the New Testament, the term Palestine is never used. The term
Israel is primarily used to refer to the people of Israel, rather than
the Land. However, in at least two passages, Israel is used to refer
to the Land:
Saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and go into
the land of Israel: for they are dead who sought the young child’s
life. And he arose, and took the young child and his mother, and came
into the land of Israel. (Matt. 2:20-21)
But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for
verily I say to you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel,
till the Son of man shall have come. (Matt. 10:23)
The first passage is when Joseph, Mary and Jesus returned from Egypt
to Israel, and the second has reference to the proclamation of the
Gospel throughout the Land of Israel. Jesus, Matthew and the angel
speaking to Joseph use the term Israel with reference to the Land,
even though the term was not then recognized by the Roman authorities.
It is clear, then, that the Bible never uses the term Palestine to
refer to the Holy Land as a whole, and that Bible maps that refer to
Palestine in the Old or New Testament are, at best, inaccurate, and,
at worst, are a conscious denial of the biblical name of Israel.
History of the Term Palestine
Where did the term Palestine originate from? How did the world and the
church get into the habit of calling the land of Israel “Palestine”?
One of the guides we use in our tours to Israel is Zvi Rivai, an
Israeli Messianic believer, who has done considerable research on this
subject. Zvi informs us that before 135 A.D., the Romans used the
terms Judea and Galilee to refer to the Land of Israel. When Titus
destroyed Jerusalem in 70 A.D., the Roman government struck a coin
with the phrase “Judea Capta,” meaning Judea has been captured. The
term Palestine was never used in the early Roman designations.
It was not until the Romans crushed the second Jewish revolt against
Rome in 135 A.D. under Bar Kochba that Emperor Hadrian applied the
term Palestine to the Land of Israel. Hadrian, like many dictators
since his time realized the propaganda power of terms and symbols. He
replaced the shrines of the Jewish Temple and the Sepulchre of Christ
in Jerusalem with temples to pagan deities. He changed the name of
Jerusalem to Aelia Capitalina, and changed the name of Israel and
Judea to Palestine. Hadrian’s selection of Palestine was purposeful,
not accidental. He took the name of the ancient enemies of Israel, the
Philistines, Latinized it to Palestine, and applied it to the Land of
Israel. He hoped to erase the name Israel from all memory. Thus, the
term Palestine as applied to the Land of Israel was invented by the
inveterate enemy of the Bible and the Jewish people, Emperor Hadrian.
It is interesting to note that the original Philistines were not
Middle Eastern at all. They were European peoples from the Adriatic
sea next to Greece. It may have pleased Hadrian to utilize this
Hellenistic term for the Jewish land. In any case, the original
“Palestinians” had nothing to do, whatsoever, with any Arabs.
Christian Adoption of the Term Palestine
One of the first Christian uses of the term Palestine is found in the
works of the Church historian Eusebius, who lived in Caesarea. He
wrote around 300 A.D., as the Roman persecution of Christians was
ending and the Emperor Constantine began to accept Christianity as
legal. Eusebius did not accept Hadrian’s designation of Jerusalem as
Aelia Capitalina, but he did use Hadrian’s term Palestine. Eusebius
considered himself to be one of the bishops of Palestine. Thus, the
anti-Israel, anti-Christian name of Palestine was assimilated into the
Church’s vocabulary as the Byzantine Empire was being established.
The Church has, since that time, broadly used the term Palestine in
literature and in maps to refer to the Land of Israel. It should be
noted, however, that the Crusaders called their land the Kingdom of
Jerusalem. When the British received the mandate after World War I,
though, they called the land on both sides of the Jordan River,
Palestine. This became the accepted geo-political term for several
decades, and those who lived in the land were called Palestinians,
whether they were Jews, Arabs or Europeans.
Even evangelical Christians who believe in the future of Israel have
used the term Palestine. The New Scofield Reference Edition of the
Bible has maps in the back entitled “Palestine under the Herods.”
There never was a Palestine under the Herods. This is a serious
misidentification. It would be something like looking at a modern map
of Texas and having it titled “Mexico in the Twentieth Century.”
The MacArthur Study Bible published just last year contains a map
called “Palestine in Christ’s Time” There are numerous references in
the notes to something called first-century Palestine.
It appears that Bible-believing Christians have either knowingly or
unwittingly followed the world, pagans and haters of Israel in calling
Israel by the anti-Israel term Palestine. It is found throughout Bible
maps, Bible commentaries and textbooks.
Proper Designation of the Land
The use of the term Palestine was biblically inaccurate and wrong
throughout the Church age. However, it is more than just wrong, it is
devastating in our time, when the term Palestine is the cornerstone of
the propaganda war against Israel and the Jewish people. Do we want to
use terms invented by those who hate Christ, the Bible and Israel? Do
we want to utilize terms used by the enemies of Israel who desire to
accomplish nothing less than the destruction of the Jewish people? I
think not.
Christians should use the terminology of the Bible wherever possible.
Why not go back to the terms used in the New Testament? The Gospel
writers used the term Israel to refer to the Land. Why should we use
any other term when referring to the Land, especially now that the
Jews are back in the Land and have re-established the nation of Israel
among the family of nations?
As we draw closer to the Second Coming of Christ, we should understand
that Satan’s fury against the Church and Israel will grow
exponentially. Satan hates the Gospel of the crucified and risen
Messiah, and he hates the reality of the restoration of Israel as the
nation that will ultimately receive Jesus as the Messiah at His
return, and the nation that will be Christ’s earthly headquarters. The
only term we should use for the Land is Israel, or its subdivisions of
Judea, Samaria, and Galilee. We should make every effort to remove the
term Palestine from our Bible maps and textbooks, and use only
biblical terms with reference to the Holy Land of Israel.
http://www.levitt.com/essays/palestine
P-Dub
Feb 12, 2012, 9:00:26 PM2/12/12
to
P-Dub: God bless Israel.
NefeshBarYochai
Feb 12, 2012, 10:59:07 PM2/12/12
to
> mirjam- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
He's beating-off again. Good report M.
>
> - Show quoted text -
Aviroce
Feb 12, 2012, 11:58:49 PM2/12/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
Back to my article: How a few can control the many? God is one
method. Holocaust is another. Hegemony over society economically,
socially, politically and educationally is another. Monopoly one way
or another. Jews are masters of that. But keep in mind what I have
been teaching::Absolute control is an illusion. Jews had absolute
control over Germany and Austria, and ended in the slaughterhouse.
Again Absolute Control is an illusion.
Do not post the history of Trilobites. Jews believe their ancestors
go back to time of the dinosaurs and their ancestors are the
trilobites, too many of these appear in the galciers in Ohio. I got
you news. Descendants of Trilobites are roaches. So Jews are Roaches
as People. It is too hard to exterminate such a water bug. Lastly,
Palestine and the Palestinians exist by Axiom. An Axiom is a Self-
evident truth, no proof is needed. You build a logic structure on the
basis of axioms. The only stipulation is that you cannot contradict
such axioms. and you don't make too many of them.
> exponentially. Satan hates the Gospel of the crucified and risen ...
>
> read more »
method. Holocaust is another. Hegemony over society economically,
socially, politically and educationally is another. Monopoly one way
or another. Jews are masters of that. But keep in mind what I have
been teaching::Absolute control is an illusion. Jews had absolute
control over Germany and Austria, and ended in the slaughterhouse.
Again Absolute Control is an illusion.
Do not post the history of Trilobites. Jews believe their ancestors
go back to time of the dinosaurs and their ancestors are the
trilobites, too many of these appear in the galciers in Ohio. I got
you news. Descendants of Trilobites are roaches. So Jews are Roaches
as People. It is too hard to exterminate such a water bug. Lastly,
Palestine and the Palestinians exist by Axiom. An Axiom is a Self-
evident truth, no proof is needed. You build a logic structure on the
basis of axioms. The only stipulation is that you cannot contradict
such axioms. and you don't make too many of them.
>
> read more »
jwshe...@satx.rr.com
Feb 13, 2012, 1:12:04 AM2/13/12
to
Ga 4:23 -But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh;
but he of the freewoman was by promise.
Ga 4:30 - Nevertheless what saith the scripture?
Cast out the bondwoman and her son:
the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir
with the son of the freewoman.
Ga 4:31 - So then, brethren, we are not
children of the bondwoman,
but of the free.
but he of the freewoman was by promise.
Ga 4:30 - Nevertheless what saith the scripture?
Cast out the bondwoman and her son:
the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir
with the son of the freewoman.
Ga 4:31 - So then, brethren, we are not
children of the bondwoman,
but of the free.
plainolamerican
Feb 13, 2012, 1:22:12 PM2/13/12
to
>
> read more »
ews are back in the Land and have re-established the nation of Israel
among the family of nations?
they were given israel back 2k years after they lost it.
w/o the USA they still can't keep it
Aviroce
Feb 13, 2012, 11:45:55 PM2/13/12
to
You quote someone. So what? It means nothing. Just because it sounds
lopsided, that does not mean it is authoritative.
I say Jews are evil. I can say it: Jewths are Shaytan; Behold the
Shaytan who beloveth evil. Mark these as Aviroce: Chapter 1,
Statement 1.
I think you got the message.
lopsided, that does not mean it is authoritative.
I say Jews are evil. I can say it: Jewths are Shaytan; Behold the
Shaytan who beloveth evil. Mark these as Aviroce: Chapter 1,
Statement 1.
I think you got the message.
Aviroce
Feb 13, 2012, 11:50:41 PM2/13/12
to
Heraclitus made an observation over two thousand years ago. He said:
I cross the river and I don't cross the river at the same time. So
how could you say Palestine was taken from the Jews and the Jews got
back Palestine and the Jews cannot keep Palestine without USA? Are
these the same Jews? Never changed? What is fixed? Are you fixed?
On Feb 13, 10:22 am, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I cross the river and I don't cross the river at the same time. So
how could you say Palestine was taken from the Jews and the Jews got
back Palestine and the Jews cannot keep Palestine without USA? Are
these the same Jews? Never changed? What is fixed? Are you fixed?
On Feb 13, 10:22 am, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com>
wrote:
mirjam
Feb 14, 2012, 7:07:27 AM2/14/12
to
AVIROCE
Look who is calling others vicious ,,, you are the one spreading hate
and lies ,,,, that is a vicious behavior
mirjam
Look who is calling others vicious ,,, you are the one spreading hate
and lies ,,,, that is a vicious behavior
mirjam
mirjam
Feb 14, 2012, 7:05:59 AM2/14/12
to
On Feb 13, 6:58 am, Aviroce <dudaras...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Back to my article: How a few can control the many? God is one
> method. Holocaust is another.
Aviroce now you have put yourself lower than you usual hate posts .
> Back to my article: How a few can control the many? God is one
> method. Holocaust is another.
What is this vicious and idiotic so called comparison doing
I will tell you how one is controlled by the Few ,,,, look at you time
and again quoting the Incitements of your Masters ,,,,, that is how
they control you !!!by spreading this kind of vicious propaganda,
The Holocaust is a Historical event in which 1/3 [ a third] of my
people were deliberately murdered by a vicious regime.
Nothing Godly about it ,,,
mirjam
Zion is going down taking USA with them and so are the fake jews
Feb 14, 2012, 9:23:59 AM2/14/12
to
steal, rob, exploit, prostitute, enslave, and destroy, torture,
murder. as long as the victim is not Jewish. It's a mental disease
somewhere in between bipolar disorder and psychopathy. It's the
membership in a terrorist, satanic cult.' -Andrew Winkler, Editor/
Publisher, ZioPedia -
Here more..
* The "Holocaust" of 6 million Jews during World War II is an
immensely successful and profitable hoax!
Vincent REYNOUARD : "Holocaust? What they hide from you ..."
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?p=1080533
http://balder.org/judea/pdf/Vincent-Reynouard-Holocaust-And-What-They-Hide-From-You.pdf
dsharavi
Feb 14, 2012, 11:21:32 AM2/14/12
to
On Feb 11, 4:24 am, "SHOWS THROWER" <frankopi...@aol.com> wrote:
> * Israel has no legal, religious, or historical right in Palestine
> Truly "Israel" existence is absolute wrong, this corruptor, thief, tyrant,
> occupier, terrorist and cancer has no right to live on the Palestinian land,
> it will always meet refusal regardless of the reconciliation, recognitions
> and surrenders!!
Cripes, what a jackass.
> * Israel has no legal, religious, or historical right in Palestine
> Truly "Israel" existence is absolute wrong, this corruptor, thief, tyrant,
> occupier, terrorist and cancer has no right to live on the Palestinian land,
> it will always meet refusal regardless of the reconciliation, recognitions
> and surrenders!!
dsharavi
Feb 14, 2012, 11:22:37 AM2/14/12
to
dsharavi
Feb 14, 2012, 11:28:43 AM2/14/12
to
On Feb 13, 8:50 pm, Aviroce <dudaras...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Heraclitus made an observation over two thousand years ago. He said:
> I cross the river and I don't cross the river at the same time. So
> how could you say Palestine was taken from the Jews and the Jews got
> back Palestine and the Jews cannot keep Palestine without USA? Are
> these the same Jews? Never changed? What is fixed? Are you fixed?
You should be fixed, before you pollute the gene pool.
> Heraclitus made an observation over two thousand years ago. He said:
> I cross the river and I don't cross the river at the same time. So
> how could you say Palestine was taken from the Jews and the Jews got
> back Palestine and the Jews cannot keep Palestine without USA? Are
> these the same Jews? Never changed? What is fixed? Are you fixed?
And your quote from Heraclitus is wrong. What Heraclitus (c535 - 475
BCE) is famous for are: "No man can cross the same river twice,
because neither the man nor the river are the same" and " Everything
flows, nothing stands still"
dsharavi
Feb 14, 2012, 11:23:18 AM2/14/12
to
On Feb 13, 8:45 pm, Aviroce <dudaras...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I say Jews are evil. I can say it: Jewths are Shaytan; Behold the
> Shaytan who beloveth evil. Mark these as Aviroce: Chapter 1,
> Statement 1.
> I think you got the message.
Sho' did. Aviroce = asshole.
> Shaytan who beloveth evil. Mark these as Aviroce: Chapter 1,
> Statement 1.
> I think you got the message.
plainolamerican
Feb 14, 2012, 2:13:02 PM2/14/12
to
which holocaust?
0 new messages