Martha Stewart: Palin is a ‘dangerous person’
John Manning
During a Saturday broadcast, lifestyle television diva Martha Stewart
panned former lawmaker Sarah Palin, calling her a "dangerous person" who
Stewart "wouldn't watch... if you paid me."
Speaking to CNN, the host of Martha Stewart Living said Palin is "very
boring to me." Having someone so "confused" in government is unsafe, she
said. That makes Palin a "dangerous person."
"She's so confused," Stewart said. "Anyone in government like that is a
real problem."
Reacting to the massive first-day sales of Palin's new book, she added:
"Good for her. Good for her. ... I wouldn't watch her if you paid me."
WATCH: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypo1sI_dmso
Joe Bruno
In my opinion, Obama is mentally ill.
Dan Listermann
"Joe Bruno" <joeb...@usa.com> wrote in message
news:3252eb85-c2c6-4ace...@o9g2000vbj.googlegroups.com...
I can understand how a mentally ill person might think that.
Jimbo
LOL! Jailbird Martha states the obvious, film at 11:00....
Jimbo
Well, that's a step in the right direction, the last president was
mentally derranged.
Lord Calvert
A con artist can always recognize another con artist.
Rich Goranson
Amherst, NY, USA
aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1
EAC Department of Paranormal Phychology
Jimbo
Exactly.
Bert Hyman
news:702278fb-3506-403e...@r31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com
Exactly?
Are you a con artist, or have you just been conned?
--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN be...@iphouse.com
Jimbo
> Innews:702278fb-3506-403e...@r31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com
>
> Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 23, 12:49 pm, Lord Calvert <CalvertdeG...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> >> A con artist can always recognize another con artist.
>
> > Exactly.
>
> Exactly?
>
> Are you a con artist, or have you just been conned?
>
About Jailbird Martha, or Quitter Palin?
Bert Hyman
news:ad935cb6-11bd-44db...@x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com
Jimbo <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
Either. Both.
You agreed so strongly with the claim that "a con artist can always
recognize another con artist", you must be a con artist yourself.
Either that, or you've been conned.
How does Stewart's pseudo-crime of "insider trading" make her a con
artist?
Is Palin any more a "quitter" than is Obama who didn't finish his term
in the Senate?
Great Dayne
> Is Palin any more a "quitter" than is Obama who didn't finish his term
> in the Senate?
Why didn't he finish his term in the senate?
Did they finally deport him for not being a citizen?
Jimbo
> Innews:ad935cb6-11bd-44db...@x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 23, 2:15 pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
> >> Innews:702278fb-3506-403e...@r31g2000vbi.googlegroups.c
> >> om
>
> >> Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Nov 23, 12:49 pm, Lord Calvert <CalvertdeG...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> A con artist can always recognize another con artist.
>
> >> > Exactly.
>
> >> Exactly?
>
> >> Are you a con artist, or have you just been conned?
>
> > About Jailbird Martha, or Quitter Palin?
>
> Either. Both.
>
> You agreed so strongly with the claim that "a con artist can always
> recognize another con artist", you must be a con artist yourself.
Logic is flawed. :D A con artist can always recognize a con artist.
That doesn't mean a non-con artists cannot recognize a con artist.
>
> Either that, or you've been conned.
Sadly, I have once or twice on, fortunately, minor things. Probably
not abnormal for someone that has reached their 66th birthday.
>
> How does Stewart's pseudo-crime of "insider trading" make her a con
> artist?
>
Why is Stewart's crime considered a pseudo-crime? Seems like the law
is fairly clear that it is a crime.
> Is Palin any more a "quitter" than is Obama who didn't finish his term
> in the Senate?
People often move into a new office when elected from a lower office.
It's not quite the same thing as flat out quitting a govenorship.
Jimbo
Dayne, have you been smoking that wacky tobaccy again?
Great Dayne
Sorry ocifer, I don't do drugs.
Bert Hyman
Jimbo <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2:55�pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>>
>> How does Stewart's pseudo-crime of "insider trading" make her a con
>> artist?
>>
>
> Why is Stewart's crime considered a pseudo-crime? Seems like the law
> is fairly clear that it is a crime.
Don't confuse the law with justice.
There are generally two kinds of criminal offenses.
One is those which are "malum in se", which is conduct which is evil in
itself, such as murder.
On the other hand, there are those which are "malum prohibitum", or acts
which are illegal simply because someone has managed to get a law passed
which says so.
[On reflection, I now remember that Stewart wasn't actually charged with
"insider trading", but instead that she made "false statements", thereby
"obstructing justice." The original investigation centered on supposed
"insider trading", during which Stewart apparently made the "false
statements" when, in fact, there had been no insider trading in the
first place. So, she was apparently guilty of lying about a crime that
didn't actually take place.]
Syd M.
Jimbo
Well, your posts seem to indicate that you do.
Jimbo
> Innews:e2c6404f-9d13-4fd3...@z7g2000vbl.googlegroups.com
>
> Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 23, 2:55 pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>
> >> How does Stewart's pseudo-crime of "insider trading" make her a con
> >> artist?
>
> > Why is Stewart's crime considered a pseudo-crime? Seems like the law
> > is fairly clear that it is a crime.
>
> Don't confuse the law with justice.
There are many forms of justice in the world, not all of which is
enshrined in our criminal code. Insider trading happens to be so
enshrined.
>
> There are generally two kinds of criminal offenses.
>
> One is those which are "malum in se", which is conduct which is evil in
> itself, such as murder.
>
> On the other hand, there are those which are "malum prohibitum", or acts
> which are illegal simply because someone has managed to get a law passed
> which says so.
I am well aware of this, but it doesn't change the basic fact that
insider trading is a crime.
>
> [On reflection, I now remember that Stewart wasn't actually charged with
> "insider trading", but instead that she made "false statements", thereby
> "obstructing justice." The original investigation centered on supposed
> "insider trading",
Either way, jailbird....
Bert Hyman
news:ddd82179-3a1a-4230...@x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com
Jimbo <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am well aware of this, but it doesn't change the basic fact that
> insider trading is a crime.
You asked why I called it a "pseudo-crime", and I told you.
It's a crime simply because someone who didn't like the behavior had the
clout to have it made illegal.
>>
>> [On reflection, I now remember that Stewart wasn't actually charged
>> with "insider trading", but instead that she made "false statements",
>> thereby "obstructing justice." The original investigation centered on
>> supposed "insider trading",
>
> Either way, jailbird....
Earlier, she was a "con artist."
John Manning
In any case she recognizes Palin for the nutjob that she is.
SwordoZ
"Bert Hyman" <be...@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9CCC93674CD...@216.250.188.141...
SoZ: :)
Yea ... like pink unicorns in flight.
Jimbo
> Innews:ddd82179-3a1a-4230...@x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com
>
> Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am well aware of this, but it doesn't change the basic fact that
> > insider trading is a crime.
>
> You asked why I called it a "pseudo-crime", and I told you.
Since it is a crime under our criminal code, I can't agree.
>
> It's a crime simply because someone who didn't like the behavior had the
> clout to have it made illegal.
>
That would be the way things become crimes, yes. Surely you can see
where her fellow stockholders were put at a great disadvantage without
the same information that she had, or the poor slobs that she sold her
shares to while she knew that the company was in a tailspin. Those
are the reasons insider trading was made illegal. Somewhat akin to
selling you my house, without notifying you that the plumbing was
about to fall apart. I had knowledge that you needed to make an
informed decision.
>
>
> >> [On reflection, I now remember that Stewart wasn't actually charged
> >> with "insider trading", but instead that she made "false statements",
> >> thereby "obstructing justice." The original investigation centered on
> >> supposed "insider trading",
>
> > Either way, jailbird....
>
> Earlier, she was a "con artist."
>
She's two, two, two criminals in one!! HAHAHAHAHA!
NefeshBarYohai
Martha Stewart uses a dildo.
Joe Bruno
Martha Stewart served time in prison. That's your kind of hero,
Manning.
You're so dumb, you believe everything she says.
Joe Bruno
> "Joe Bruno" <joebr...@usa.com> wrote in message
You're too stupid to undertstand anything.
Bert Hyman
Jimbo <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 3:58�pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>> Innews:ddd82179-3a1a-4230...@x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.c
>> om
>>
>> Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I am well aware of this, but it doesn't change the basic fact that
>> > insider trading is a crime.
>>
>> You asked why I called it a "pseudo-crime", and I told you.
>
> Since it is a crime under our criminal code, I can't agree.
>
>>
>> It's a crime simply because someone who didn't like the behavior had
>> the clout to have it made illegal.
>>
>
> That would be the way things become crimes, yes.
Sort of like the War on (Some) Drugs, I guess.
Are you a drug warrior? It is the law, after all.
Jimbo
> Innews:ad45eaa7-364c-44d5...@z7g2000vbl.googlegroups.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 23, 3:58 pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
> >> Innews:ddd82179-3a1a-4230...@x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.c
> >> om
>
> >> Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I am well aware of this, but it doesn't change the basic fact that
> >> > insider trading is a crime.
>
> >> You asked why I called it a "pseudo-crime", and I told you.
>
> > Since it is a crime under our criminal code, I can't agree.
>
> >> It's a crime simply because someone who didn't like the behavior had
> >> the clout to have it made illegal.
>
> > That would be the way things become crimes, yes.
>
> Sort of like the War on (Some) Drugs, I guess.
>
> Are you a drug warrior? It is the law, after all.
>
If you're asking me if people that abuse, or traffic drugs should go
to jail when they're caught, the answer is yes.
Bert Hyman
news:a1e28ed7-2004-4408...@g31g2000vbr.googlegroups.com
Jimbo <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
Fascinating.
Can you think of any other schemes to provide new markets for organized
crime, while expanding the power of the government over the law-abiding
populace at the same time?
You probably think that prohibition was a good idea too.
Tim McGaughy
> On Nov 23, 6:36 am, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>> During a Saturday broadcast, lifestyle television diva Martha Stewart
>> panned former lawmaker Sarah Palin, calling her a "dangerous person" who
>> Stewart "wouldn't watch... if you paid me."
>>
>> Speaking to CNN, the host of Martha Stewart Living said Palin is "very
>> boring to me." Having someone so "confused" in government is unsafe, she
>> said. That makes Palin a "dangerous person."
>>
>> "She's so confused," Stewart said. "Anyone in government like that is a
>> real problem."
>>
>> Reacting to the massive first-day sales of Palin's new book, she added:
>> "Good for her. Good for her. ... I wouldn't watch her if you paid me."
>>
>> WATCH:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypo1sI_dmso
>
> In my opinion, Obama is mentally ill.
In my opinion, YOU are mentally ill. The post you responded to had
nothing to do with Obama, and your obsession with him if very telling.
Dr. Smartass, Troll Veterinarian
news:1e9d4992-40cc-46e2...@g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com:
> You're too stupid to undertstand anything.
1st Grade called. They need their weak, childish insult back. There's a
scuffle in a sandbox and you're bogarting the stupid kid's line.
--
Doc Smartass | BAAWA Knight of Troll Medication | aa # 1939
Book reviews: http://jw-bookblog.blogspot.com/
Kook Clearinghouse! http://kookclearinghouse.blogspot.com/
Hey, GOPpers: Grab a Mop!
Dr. Smartass, Troll Veterinarian
c3ad02...@t18g2000vbj.googlegroups.com:
> You're so dumb, you believe everything she says.
Oh look--the brutard calls someone else dumb!
There's some sizable irony there.
Wipe your chin, son, show some pride or you'll NEVER earn that bronze in
the Brutard Olympics.
�R.L.Measures
McGaughy <tee...@toast.net> wrote:
� Indeed Tim.
"The sins of the fathers are visited upon the children,
------ Ibsen
--
R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
Jimbo
> Innews:a1e28ed7-2004-4408...@g31g2000vbr.googlegroups.com
>
> Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 23, 4:58 pm, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>
> >> Are you a drug warrior? It is the law, after all.
>
> > If you're asking me if people that abuse, or traffic drugs should go
> > to jail when they're caught, the answer is yes.
>
> Fascinating.
>
> Can you think of any other schemes to provide new markets for organized
> crime, while expanding the power of the government over the law-abiding
> populace at the same time?
If your alternative is to have streets full of shambling drug addicts,
like downtown Detroit has become where the drug laws are lightly
enforced, I'll take my change with the Government.
fla...@verizon.net
On 23-Nov-2009, Bert Hyman <be...@iphouse.com> wrote:
> In
> news:702278fb-3506-403e...@r31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com
> Jimbo <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 23, 12:49�pm, Lord Calvert <CalvertdeG...@msn.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> A con artist can always recognize another con artist.
> >
> > Exactly.
>
> Exactly?
>
> Are you a con artist, or have you just been conned?
I'd have to say either - Martha Stewart was clearly railroaded.
*Dozens*, if not *hundreds* of MEN do what she was accused
of doing, and get *at worst* a slap on the wrist.
Susan
Great Dayne
No they don't.
That is something, ocifer, that you just made up.
Jimbo
Yes, they do.
Great Dayne
>
> - Show quoted text -
Simply stating that ocifer, won't allow you to have me under your
stupid surveillance imbecile!
NefeshBarYohai
> On 23-Nov-2009, Bert Hyman <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>
> > In
> >news:702278fb-3506-403e...@r31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com
> > > On Nov 23, 12:49 pm, Lord Calvert <CalvertdeG...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> > >> A con artist can always recognize another con artist.
>
> > > Exactly.
>
> > Exactly?
>
> > Are you a con artist, or have you just been conned?
>
> I'd have to say either - Martha Stewart was clearly railroaded.
> *Dozens*, if not *hundreds* of MEN do what she was accused
> of doing, and get *at worst* a slap on the wrist.
>
> Susan
I don't like Martha Stewart because she put down Sarah Palin and
Rachel Ray. Some nice gentleman should give her a stiff dick and
maybe she could find something good to say about her betters.
Jimbo
You're a crackpot Dayne, no way around it. Perhaps your doctor should
up your meds.
Great Dayne
I am not.
> Perhaps your doctor should
> up your meds.
You are completely unqualified to pronounce that you ignorant
pigheaded blockhead.