Israel dismally fails the requirements of a
tolerant pluralistic society, according to a
new report from the U.S. State Department.
Despite boasting religious freedom
and protection of all holy sites,
Israel falls short in tolerance
toward minorities,
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1126286.html
David
A Gentile is supposed to ask himself the same thng a Jew does:
"Who wrote the article & why?" Or, more specifically, what benefit
comes from the article, & to whom?
Susan
<fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:hd1gjs$i8d$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> On 6-Nov-2009, "DoD" <danski...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> [This ain't from Gideon.... So, is it legit???????? Is Israel really a
>> racist society?
>> I could have borrowed the title that the leftist who posted this on
>> unmoderated used....ISRAEL=Racist Society - USA State Department - Akiva
>> Eldar - HAARETZ]
>> http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1126286.html
> A Gentile is supposed to ask himself the same thng a Jew does:
> "Who wrote the article & why?" Or, more specifically, what benefit
> comes from the article, & to whom?
That was really a TIC (tongue in cheek) question. For the life of me, I
don't see
how anyone (PalArabs included) could benefit from such an article.
David
> <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:hd1gjs$i8d$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
> >
> > On 6-Nov-2009, "DoD" <danski...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> [This ain't from Gideon.... So, is it legit???????? Is Israel really a
> >> racist society?
> >> I could have borrowed the title that the leftist who posted this on
> >> unmoderated used....ISRAEL=Racist Society - USA State Department -
> >> Akiva
> >> Eldar - HAARETZ]
>
> >> http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1126286.html
>
> > A Gentile is supposed to ask himself the same thng a Jew does:
> > "Who wrote the article & why?" Or, more specifically, what benefit
> > comes from the article, & to whom?
>
> That was really a TIC (tongue in cheek) question.
And mine was a vaguely smart-alec answer,
but I was serious about the "meat" of it.
> For the life of me, I don't see
> how anyone (PalArabs included) could benefit from such an article.
I haven't bothered ot read it because I assumed (oh, my!)
that it was the usual apartheid lies, but anything that
painmts Israel bad is good for the PalArabs - and the
State Dept certainly wants to make Israel look bad when
it can force her to do what the president wants (& surely
the US can only look better if someone else looks worse,
right?).
Susan
<fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:hd1pvm$6hm$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> On 6-Nov-2009, "DoD" <danski...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't bothered ot read it because I assumed (oh, my!)
> that it was the usual apartheid lies, but anything that
> painmts Israel bad is good for the PalArabs -
I don't see how that is *good* for the Palarabs....It maybe what they
want, but it is certainly not *good* for them. A kid might want to stick a
penny in a socket... Doesn't mean it is good for them.... Quick example that
can
be expanded on...If Jews weren't around, who would the Palarabs kill? Each
other.... There are
many examples of this already...
David
> <fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:hd1pvm$6hm$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
> >
> > On 6-Nov-2009, "DoD" <danski...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I haven't bothered ot read it because I assumed (oh, my!)
> > that it was the usual apartheid lies, but anything that
> > painmts Israel bad is good for the PalArabs -
>
> I don't see how that is *good* for the Palarabs....It maybe what they
> want, but it is certainly not *good* for them.
Oh, well, if we're going on *that* criterion...!
> A kid might want to stick a
> penny in a socket... Doesn't mean it is good for them.... Quick example
> that
> can
> be expanded on...If Jews weren't around, who would the Palarabs kill?
> Each
> other....
Exactly.
Susan
With all due respect David, think what you like, thats the general
Idea
<sigh>
WADR Lee, I do think what I like.
David
Oh wow. This goes back 20 years or more. A brief
remark on "pluralism": some have said that we must
not allow the Fort Hood massacre to undermine "diversity"
IOW, we should permit national (USA) suicide by enabling
those who would destroy it.
A similar thinking is behind this comment.