What do you think?
Are there any comments in the Torah or Talmud on this issue?
Amitai
Bruno, grow up and stop taking your personal venedettas to other groups.
You have not only accused me of being a liarbut have also accused Susan
and I of being liars and forgers.
You hurt only yourself .
The person in question doesn't lie Bruno and Tilly and Susan Cohen have
provided evidence to prove it.
You on the other hand post snonsense like this to news groups:a thread with
the subject header:
'Susan Cohen And Tilly-Two Stupid Dogs Who Forge Posts'.
Your behaviour is out of order and you really ought to stop.
Amitai
Thanks Amitai for your excellent response which should give pause for
thought..
Watch it! Meir might get on your back about saying Susan's surname :-)
> Notice, Sheldon, that I didn't mention any names. Why all of a sudden has Tilly decided I meant her???
LOL!
I believe one of the 10 commandments deals with false speech, but I'm
not sure which one.
Can you clarify this for me?
The third commandment, which prohibits false oaths:
7 Thou shalt not take the name of HaShem thy G-d in vain; for HaShem
will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in vain.
and the ninth:
13 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Amitai
Thanks.
> I have met one person who lies constantly who insists what a good Jew
> she is.
> In my opinion, she cannot be.
Is this based on your extensive knowledge of the
KJV, or your own lies?
> What do you think?
That you are not fooling anyone but you, & that you
are obviusly not winning on the unmoderated forum,
or you wouldn't be trying this passive agressive crap
over here.
Susan
> > Notice, Sheldon, that I didn't mention any names. Why all of a sudden
> > has Tilly decided I meant her???
> LOL!
Yeah, it's amazing that people who can read
know the people you've mentioned in other forums.
How AMAZING.
Susan
> On Dec 23, 6:59�am, sheldonlg <sheldo...@giganews.com> wrote:
>
> > Watch it! �Meir might get on your back about saying Susan's surname :-)
Meir knows the difference between people thinking
they are defending someone, and people who are
going out of their way to hold someone up to what
they hope is scorn/ridicule/abuse/etc.
Susan, who isn't as gentle as either Moshe or Micha.
The ninth commandment that says you shall not bear false witness
against your neighbor?
--
ArtKamlet at a o l dot c o m Columbus OH K2PZH
His attacks aren't directed at any discernably specific person here.
The initial question was appropriate for this forum. Bringing the SCJ
crud into it makes it problematic. For what it's worth, I have been
rejecting posts that pursue such a vendetta, and am permitting posts
which pertain to the original question.
--
Don Levey, Framingam MA If knowledge is power,
(email address in header works) and power corrupts, then...
NOTE: Don't send mail to to sal...@the-leveys.us
GnuPG public key: http://www.the-leveys.us:6080/keys/don-dsakey.asc
Maybe Tilly shouldn't have given Susan's surname, but she did it in
passing, when she is perhaps angry at someone else about something
else.
You posted specifically to give her name, in a thread she herself was
reading and posting to.
I don't know Tillie's motivation, but it seems to have been in order
to be clear who had provided evidence that supports her position.
Somewhat self-serving and I havent' read the thread in some other ng,
but I think she feels it would serve Susan's interest too. It appears
she feels in alliance with Susan on this and so may reasonably feel
that Susan would want or not mind her name being used. That's my
impression and I havent' been able to read it any other way, but maybe
I'm wrong and Tillie deserves strong criticism too.
In your case, you replied solely to give her last name and the
motivation seemed to be to show that, "Hey, I'm an insider. I know
her last name and I can prove it." When Susan was posting to the
thread herself and could have answered had she chosen to.
--
Meir
"The baby's name is Shlomo. He's named after his grandfather, Scott."
Notice that I didn't mention any names. Only Tilly did that.
I was asking a question about Jewish law which has bothered me for
years.
I have encountered Jews who lie several times over the years.
I always wondered why other Jews seem to tolerate it.
>
> --
Except I didn't mention any names.
My statement was meant as a joke.
They are.
> angry that this SCJ crap is appearing on SCJM. And now, one of the
> participants on this thread (the one who started it) will send a
> flurry of harassing e-mails to anyone who hasn't already reported his
> abuse to his ISP. I don't understand why this cr*p is appearing on
> SCJM.
Agreed.
You have a semi-valid point in that Susan could have done it. I was
only answering a question asked and I think you made a big deal out of
virtually nothing -- for whatever reasons that may have motivated you.
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:59:10 +0000 (UTC), sheldonlg
> <shel...@giganews.com> wrote:
>
> >Watch it! Meir might get on your back about saying Susan's surname :-)
>
> I don't know Tillie's motivation, ....I think she feels it would serve
> Susan's interest too
*That* was precisely her motivation.
(Call me psychic)
> In your case, you replied solely to give her last name and the
> motivation seemed to be to show that, "Hey, I'm an insider. I know
> her last name and I can prove it."
Ok. that, too.
> When Susan was posting to the
> thread herself and could have answered had she chosen to.
If I had seen the question, I might have,
depending on what mood I was in. :-)
Susan