Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

sexless asians

0 views
Skip to first unread message

westsid...@msn.com

unread,
May 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/3/97
to alexy...@earthlink.net

I'm talking about Asian men, the women are feminine and sexy. I've
posted before on what scientists such a J. Phillipe Rushton say about
race and IQ. But what they say about sex is more interesting. These
scientists say that because Orientals evolved in the frigid temperture of
Northeast Asia the men had to evolve to be less sexually competative. If
Asians mated with numerous women, as Africans do, and left these women to
raise their children alone , they would leave no descendants. The women
can't raise the kids alone in the winter because they cannot hunt. As a
result natural selection favored the man who stayed with one woman. In
Africa with many men mating with one woman, the man with the most sperm
(ie sperm competition) would leave the most descendants. The result -
bigger balls. Blacks and Whites have testes weighing 20 grams; Asian men
have balls only weighing 9 grams. Asians are also less muscular and have
fewer (or no) apocrine gland to give off smells to attract the other sex.
Asian men remind me of the little hairless sexless and insipid
depections we see of flying saucer people. In America we White guys and
some Blacks get all the good looking Asian girls. A little Asian guy
can't do anything to defend his woman or keep his woman. And Asian
culture is sexless and insipid compared to Black or White culture.
Compare the music Asians invented (little tinny clang sounds) with Black
or White music which has feeling and soul. Nature gave Asians a few
extra IQ points in return for demasculizing them. I wouldn't have my
balls shrunk to half size for 3 IQ points. Alexycchiu says China will
take over the U.S. No way, You don't have the HUEVOS to do it. Billy

-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet

M. Taylor

unread,
May 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/4/97
to

By "Billy" the only Chinese White man.
Sorry "Billy" it's all in the English errors !

M. Taylor

unread,
May 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/4/97
to

Tomoyuki Tanaka

unread,
May 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/4/97
to

i've looked at a few books by J. Phillipe Rushton (is he dead now?).

i didn't find this speculative stuff. which book is this from?

Joseph Hyungsun Shin

unread,
May 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/4/97
to

Excerpts from netnews.soc.culture.korean: 3-May-97 sexless asians by
westsid...@msn.com
> I'm talking about Asian men, the women are feminine and sexy. I've
> posted before on what scientists such a J. Phillipe Rushton say about
> race and IQ. But what they say about sex is more interesting. These
> scientists say that because Orientals evolved in the frigid temperture of
> Northeast Asia the men had to evolve to be less sexually competative. If
> Asians mated with numerous women, as Africans do, and left these women to
> raise their children alone , they would leave no descendants. The women
> can't raise the kids alone in the winter because they cannot hunt. As a


isn't it a fact that hunting was done mostly by men in all races, whether
they are white, black, or asian?
if cold weather explains the little sexual competition among asian
men, then white men who evolved and lived in the frigid regions of
scandinavia and the former soviet union also stayed with one woman and
are less sexually competitive than those who evolved in warmer region? i
don't think so smartass....


Excerpts from netnews.soc.culture.korean: 3-May-97 sexless asians by
westsid...@msn.com

> As a
> result natural selection favored the man who stayed with one woman. In
> Africa with many men mating with one woman, the man with the most sperm
> (ie sperm competition) would leave the most descendants. The result -
> bigger balls. Blacks and Whites have testes weighing 20 grams; Asian men
> have balls only weighing 9 grams.

your repeated mentioning of Africans fucking like rabbits do not
explain how white men, such as yourself, "came to have big balls." if
you are so interested in scientific findings of sex, you should have
known that studies suggest little or no disparity in the average sizes
of sexual organs across ALL races.

pop quiz: Which country has the highest population in the world?
pop quiz 2: Which country has the second highest population in the world?
hint: they are both Asian countries.

asian males do not have problems with producing offsprings whatsoever.


Excerpts from netnews.soc.culture.korean: 3-May-97 sexless asians by
westsid...@msn.com

> Asians are also less muscular and have
> fewer (or no) apocrine gland to give off smells to attract the other sex.
> Asian men remind me of the little hairless sexless and insipid
> depections we see of flying saucer people.

Asian males have less hair than you, whiteboy, because we have
evolved a lot more to NOT have nasty hair sticking out of our shirt
collar and covering our backs just like an ape. Talk to me about
apocrine glands when you can back up your mindless babbling with some
credible source.


Excerpts from netnews.soc.culture.korean: 3-May-97 sexless asians by
westsid...@msn.com

> In America we White guys and
> some Blacks get all the good looking Asian girls. A little Asian guy
> can't do anything to defend his woman or keep his woman. And Asian
> culture is sexless and insipid compared to Black or White culture.
> Compare the music Asians invented (little tinny clang sounds) with Black
> or White music which has feeling and soul. Nature gave Asians a few
> extra IQ points in return for demasculizing them. I wouldn't have my
> balls shrunk to half size for 3 IQ points.


Asian history and culture has A LOT more than "little tinny clang
sounds" or soul/feeling than you - an uneducated, ignorant, and mentally
challenged whiteboy - claim.

It is true that many Asian females are dating men outside their own
race, but it goes both ways, dumbass. I've been with girls of many
different backgrounds and culture, even a few with your white trash
background, unfortunately.

Your empty generalizations are not only incorrect, but dangerous and
harmful to your health, whiteboy. You better wish that you don't fuck
with a girl who has an Asian boyfriend who would stop at nothing to
defend his woman. I personally would love to kick the living hell out of
you, rip your tiny balls out and shove them down your throat if you
fucked with my woman.

Your display of utter stupidity leads me to believe that you do not
get ANY women, let alone Asians. Does it make you feel powerful to hide
behind a stupid ass name like "westsidebeavis" and ramble on about
nothing?

Have fun with your porno mags and hands, loser.

Mr_Su...@hotmail.com

unread,
May 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/4/97
to
> I'm talking about Asian men, the women are feminine and sexy. I've
> posted before on what scientists such a J. Phillipe Rushton say about
> race and IQ. But what they say about sex is more interesting. These
> scientists say that because Orientals evolved in the frigid temperture of
> Northeast Asia the men had to evolve to be less sexually competative. If
> Asians mated with numerous women, as Africans do, and left these women to
> raise their children alone , they would leave no descendants. The women
> can't raise the kids alone in the winter because they cannot hunt. As a
> result natural selection favored the man who stayed with one woman. In
> Africa with many men mating with one woman, the man with the most sperm
> (ie sperm competition) would leave the most descendants. The result -
> bigger balls. Blacks and Whites have testes weighing 20 grams; Asian men
> have balls only weighing 9 grams. Asians are also less muscular and have

> fewer (or no) apocrine gland to give off smells to attract the other sex.
> Asian men remind me of the little hairless sexless and insipid
> depections we see of flying saucer people. In America we White guys and

> some Blacks get all the good looking Asian girls. A little Asian guy
> can't do anything to defend his woman or keep his woman. And Asian
> culture is sexless and insipid compared to Black or White culture.
> Compare the music Asians invented (little tinny clang sounds) with Black
> or White music which has feeling and soul. Nature gave Asians a few
> extra IQ points in return for demasculizing them. I wouldn't have my
> balls shrunk to half size for 3 IQ points. Alexycchiu says China will
> take over the U.S. No way, You don't have the HUEVOS to do it. Billy
>
> -------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet


Here is another post from this idiot:

In article <8620922...@dejanews.com>,
westsid...@msn.com wrote:
>
> This is mainly and answer to Atlatl's last post. You make some good
> points, but most can be easily refuted. I now agree that Black music is
> no worse than white. In fact when I was a teenager I listened to mostly
> Black performers such as the Platters, Diane Ross, Little Richard, etc.
> And this music did express emotions I could easily relate to. Although I
> lied on another post (to make a point) about my age, the following is
> true. I'm white married to a Korean. I have three sons who are of
^^^^^^^^^^^^
> course non-white. I am not inclined to be prejudiced.......


Why is it that some of the most racist white men are themselves married
to Asian women? This idiot reminds me of the asiaphile James Michener,
whose book "Rising Sun" was indirectly responsible for much of the Asian
bashing of the late 80s and early 90s.

- SAGE

some guy

unread,
May 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/4/97
to

M. Taylor wrote:

>I reckon Moe and SAGE should together for friendship...and more. They
>have so much (crap) in common that they could settle down together and
>have a SIM family and teach them how to be miserable, mean-hearted
>anti-social misogynists.

>For Crap read SAGE.

It's exactly because of this type of typical attitude that Asian men
have that makes so many Asian women want to date outside of their race.
We actually gotta thank these guys.

Mike

mckim

unread,
May 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/4/97
to

In article <8626877...@dejanews.com>, westsid...@msn.com says...
>

AHHA....You are only idiot I know ever talking nice about black
man genital.. Jesus... haven't ' you heard white male complainting black
man genital is too just big posing a threat to white pussy...
Didn't white man always find himself inferior in their genital size
in compare to black man's ..This inferiority led angry white males to
lynch black man. Sometimes they cut off black man genital like
Jeffrey Dahmer did...whatever happened all the white supremacist talk..
Join White supremacist you will learn the genital history of your race...


Hey talk about white ball in history, I just watched the movie called "Rosewood"
where one angry white male so frustrated with his ball can't get the satisfaction
so he beat hell out of his white woman. Then this white woman (like Susan Smith)
blamed on black male. So it goes history of white supremacistl... black people
got the victim of lynching mob and whole black populaitons in the City of Rosewood
leave because of this single white ball sexual frustration.

of course, White Supremacist patriarchy like this moron loves to polarize Asian
culture based on sexuality so that white guys capitalizing the situation...
This is the exactly how white racism is perpeturating in this culture as this
racist idiot proves to us here one more time...

Thank you for giving me an opportunity to talking about Rosewood...

M. Taylor

unread,
May 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/4/97
to

Joseph Hyungsun Shin wrote:
>


boring racist retalliation snipped.

You bit hard Mr. Hyung

The Native Problem

unread,
May 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/4/97
to

On Mon, 05 May 1997 00:32:39 +0800, "M. Taylor" <Co...@ispy.star.ca>
wrote:

>
>I reckon Moe and SAGE should together for friendship...and more. They

No, SAGE/Shoeshine doesn't like to have REAL people as friends. He
prefers to just make up friends in his imagination and then pretend to
be them on the internet. Many children like to do this, but usually
they grow out of it by they are SAGE's age (mid-to-early teens).

>have so much (crap) in common that they could settle down together and
>have a SIM family and teach them how to be miserable, mean-hearted
>anti-social misogynists.

Only if Moe can convince Shoeshine Boy's caretakers to release him
from the mental ward. His therapy for the multiple-personalities
doesn't seem to be working.

Imbuka
The Native Problem

Dave Cho

unread,
May 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/4/97
to

Yeah, Hyung bit hard I agree, but it was mutual racism intiated by one,
and I certainly wouldn't have sat back if someone said that in front of
my face. Instances like that is a Catch 22, you have to respond, and
the fact that you have to respond to such stupid shit would get me
pissed off.

Dryfus

unread,
May 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/4/97
to

mc...@ziplink.com (mckim) wrote:
>In article <8626877...@dejanews.com>, westsid...@msn.com says...
>>
>
> AHHA....You are only idiot I know ever talking nice about black
>man genital.. Jesus... haven't ' you heard white male complainting black
>man genital is too just big posing a threat to white pussy...
>Didn't white man always find himself inferior in their genital size
>in compare to black man's ..This inferiority led angry white males to
>lynch black man. Sometimes they cut off black man genital like
>Jeffrey Dahmer did...whatever happened all the white supremacist talk..
>Join White supremacist you will learn the genital history of your race...
>
>

I subscribe to Pillipe Rushton's theories. Blacks have biggest dicks,
then come Whites, then come Asians. Why deny that fact? This is one reason
why blacks and whites commit far more rapes and other forms of sexual
deviant behaviours than Asians. Another of Rushton's theories is that
Blacks and whites committ far more crime than Asians, because of their
bigger dicks. In terms of IQ and intelligence, Asians are the top dog,
then whites, then blacks. Why deny the truth?


M. Taylor

unread,
May 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/5/97
to

I reckon Moe and SAGE should together for friendship...and more. They

have so much (crap) in common that they could settle down together and
have a SIM family and teach them how to be miserable, mean-hearted
anti-social misogynists.

For Crap read SAGE.

Tomoyuki Tanaka

unread,
May 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/5/97
to

In article <5khujv$gq...@news.asiaonline.net>, Moe <m...@moe.com> wrote:
>
>... BTW, it was another Asiaphile, Michael
>Crichton, who wrote Rising Sun, although Michener was a notorious
>Asiaphile in his own right.
>


James Michener was an Asiaphile (anti-Asian bigot)?

please elaborate.

Moe

unread,
May 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/5/97
to

Mr_Su...@hotmail.com wrote:

(snip)

>Why is it that some of the most racist white men are themselves married
>to Asian women? This idiot reminds me of the asiaphile James Michener,
>whose book "Rising Sun" was indirectly responsible for much of the Asian
>bashing of the late 80s and early 90s.

>- SAGE

You're right on this one. Asiaphiles are some of the most racist
critters around and view Asians and Asian culture as inferior.
However, since they can't attract white females, they revert to the
exploitation of insecure AF's who seek to rid themselves of their
Asian heritage by marrying any available WM they can find. Such
relationships are more akin to slavery than a healthy, loving
relationship based on mutual respect. At first, the asiaphile will
try to hide his racism from his AF, but eventually, it leaks out bit
by bit and reinforces the latent autoracist attitudes already held by
the AF. Furthermore, asiaphiles are sexist, because they view AF's as
weak and in need of a saviour. Perhaps they are right on this point.
After all, many AF's are too dense to see the racism in their WM
master or are too apathetic to care, buying into their propaganda
hook, line and sinker. BTW, it was another Asiaphile, Michael


Crichton, who wrote Rising Sun, although Michener was a notorious
Asiaphile in his own right.

mckim

unread,
May 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/5/97
to

In article <336CBA...@ispy.star.ca>, Co...@ispy.star.ca says...

Please keep your ignorances in your closet. Moe and Sage are NOT
Anti-social or anti-feminist or any sort of anti-human way.
They are fighting for the EQUALITY and FREEDOM which is
is more than a civil right, but a human right that we want to
seek. They are fighting for the freewill of human spirit.

If Moe and SAGE form a friendship, I will be there with two of my
best friends: Leonard Lee and Randy Soroth. Leo is Korean-American
married to Korean woman who also recognizes the white racism
of anti-Asian males demonization. Randy Soroth is Cambodian
guy married to his high-school sweetheart. He got a new baby..
They know the impact of Asiaphile and Whiggie in this society...

trio...@acsu.buffalo.edu

unread,
May 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/5/97
to mckim


while on crack, mckim wrote:

> >I reckon Moe and SAGE should together for friendship...and more. They
> >have so much (crap) in common that they could settle down together and
> >have a SIM family and teach them how to be miserable, mean-hearted
> >anti-social misogynists.
> >
>

> Please keep your ignorances in your closet. Moe and Sage are NOT
> Anti-social or anti-feminist or any sort of anti-human way.
> They are fighting for the EQUALITY and FREEDOM which is
> is more than a civil right, but a human right that we want to
> seek. They are fighting for the freewill of human spirit.

no they are saying who can date who and for what
reasons how is this freedom?



> If Moe and SAGE form a friendship, I will be there with two of my
> best friends: Leonard Lee and Randy Soroth. Leo is Korean-American
> married to Korean woman who also recognizes the white racism
> of anti-Asian males demonization. Randy Soroth is Cambodian
> guy married to his high-school sweetheart. He got a new baby..
> They know the impact of Asiaphile and Whiggie in this society...

question is can you see the anti- white racism on this ng?
or the anti- choie of mate attitude morons like you reak
of?


mckim

unread,
May 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/5/97
to

In article <8627439...@dejanews.com>, Mr_Su...@hotmail.com says...
>
>In article <8626877...@dejanews.com>,
>> -------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
>> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
>
>
>Here is another post from this idiot:
>
>In article <8620922...@dejanews.com>,
> westsid...@msn.com wrote:
>>
>> This is mainly and answer to Atlatl's last post. You make some good
>> points, but most can be easily refuted. I now agree that Black music is
>> no worse than white. In fact when I was a teenager I listened to mostly
>> Black performers such as the Platters, Diane Ross, Little Richard, etc.
>> And this music did express emotions I could easily relate to. Although I
>> lied on another post (to make a point) about my age, the following is
>> true. I'm white married to a Korean. I have three sons who are of
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> course non-white. I am not inclined to be prejudiced.......
>
>

Man...this guy is just amazed me just about taking every God-Damned
opportunty he taking from Asian culture and even has willing to
insult Asian male. I told many Asian-Amercians to remind
watch out all whites they are coming like hungry wolf anytime!!!
This guy is one clear example of how White racism is perpeturated
in Asian-American culture that we MUST MUST take care
ourself first.

>Why is it that some of the most racist white men are themselves married
>to Asian women? This idiot reminds me of the asiaphile James Michener,
>whose book "Rising Sun" was indirectly responsible for much of the Asian
>bashing of the late 80s and early 90s.
>

James Michernr wrote many books mostly dealing with
non-white americna culture such as mexican, Japanese, Phillphino.
His books are products of the white patriarchal value becauese
this guy is shared the value of white supremacist patriarchy.
"Rising Sun" is stuff wrote by another white Supremacist writer
named Michael Crichton.

All these guys are very dangerous to freedom and democracy
of the oppressed people of the world.

>- SAGE

'Ringo' K. Wong

unread,
May 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/5/97
to


Oh poor little Billy, you know what... I don't think any asian women that
married to American are pretty at all. Well may be not, in your point of
view. See that's the different !!! You can't compare people with
different culture and background. We (all human) are the most intelligent
animal... well may be one's not... Sex is not everything (unlike what you
trying to say in your message), why don't you do us a flavor to shut up ?

Thanks so much for your comments.
Ringo

Charles Eicher

unread,
May 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/5/97
to

In article <5kjdhc$qik$1...@mark.ucdavis.edu>, ez07...@rocky.ucdavis.edu
(Tomoyuki Tanaka) wrote:

> In article <5khujv$gq...@news.asiaonline.net>, Moe <m...@moe.com> wrote:
> >

> >... BTW, it was another Asiaphile, Michael


> >Crichton, who wrote Rising Sun, although Michener was a notorious
> >Asiaphile in his own right.
> >

> James Michener was an Asiaphile (anti-Asian bigot)?
>
> please elaborate.

Yes, Jamese Michener ws an asiaphile, but this does not imply he was an
anti-asian bigot, despite Tanaka's effort to link this term to his warped
definition.

Michener is best known for popular fiction books like "Shogun" but he began
his career by publishing a non-fiction book on ukiyo-e (japanese woodblock
prints). His ukiyo-e book was highly regarded, and is still used by many
art history professors when they teach Japanese art history. Michener was a
collector and trader of Japanese art, and made a great contribution towards
intercultural understanding by bringing these arts to a worldwide audience.

Only bigots like Tanaka or Moe could believe Michener was anti-asian.


| Charles Eicher |
| -=- |
| cei...@inav.net |

mckim

unread,
May 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/5/97
to

In article <336C87...@aol.com>, inv...@aol.com says...

>
>
>M. Taylor wrote:
>
>>I reckon Moe and SAGE should together for friendship...and more. They
>>have so much (crap) in common that they could settle down together and
>>have a SIM family and teach them how to be miserable, mean-hearted
>>anti-social misogynists.
>
>>For Crap read SAGE.
>
>It's exactly because of this type of typical attitude that Asian men
>have that makes so many Asian women want to date outside of their race.
>We actually gotta thank these guys.
>
>Mike

Mike, don't try to dictate your racist ignorances to further divide Asian-American
community.. Asian women marry to in IRR stuff because this society has brainwashed
them to serve in white culture and white males by using the most effective
propaganda machine ever invented by human race- Hollywood.


M. Taylor

unread,
May 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/6/97
to

mckim wrote:
>
> In article <336CBA...@ispy.star.ca>, Co...@ispy.star.ca says...
> >
> >
> >I reckon Moe and SAGE should together for friendship...and more. They
> >have so much (crap) in common that they could settle down together and
> >have a SIM family and teach them how to be miserable, mean-hearted
> >anti-social misogynists.
> >
> >For Crap read SAGE.
>
> Please keep your ignorances in your closet. Moe and Sage are NOT
> Anti-social or anti-feminist or any sort of anti-human way.
> They are fighting for the EQUALITY and FREEDOM which is
> is more than a civil right, but a human right that we want to
> seek. They are fighting for the freewill of human spirit.
>
> If Moe and SAGE form a friendship, I will be there with two of my
> best friends: Leonard Lee and Randy Soroth. Leo is Korean-American
> married to Korean woman who also recognizes the white racism
> of anti-Asian males demonization. Randy Soroth is Cambodian
> guy married to his high-school sweetheart. He got a new baby..
> They know the impact of Asiaphile and Whiggie in this society...

For crap read SAGE.

Moe

unread,
May 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/6/97
to

mc...@ziplink.com (mckim) wrote:

>In article <336CBA...@ispy.star.ca>, Co...@ispy.star.ca says...
>>
>>
>>I reckon Moe and SAGE should together for friendship...and more. They
>>have so much (crap) in common that they could settle down together and
>>have a SIM family and teach them how to be miserable, mean-hearted
>>anti-social misogynists.
>>
>>For Crap read SAGE.

>Please keep your ignorances in your closet. Moe and Sage are NOT
>Anti-social or anti-feminist or any sort of anti-human way.
>They are fighting for the EQUALITY and FREEDOM which is
>is more than a civil right, but a human right that we want to
>seek. They are fighting for the freewill of human spirit.
>

McKim,

You're wasting your energy trying to reason with these white racist
asiaphiles. They don't have a clue and simply seek to impose their
politically correct, self serving views on Asians. Their goal is to
protect the status quo, which is structured to benefit them as WM's. I
guess we really can't blame these guys. After all, they are in all
likelihood socially dysfunctional, maladjusted souls who have been
cast aside by their own culture. They are the rejects of white
society. Fully aware of this, they cling desperately to any
structural advantages that accrue to them by virtue of their race.
It's just about all they have going for them and they feel they need
to protect this advantage. So, like cockroaches and other pests, they
intrude into Asian newsgroups, selfishly attempting to undermine any
dialog that might increase Asians' overall awareness of the various
ways that the white racism and hegemony manifests itself at our
expense. After all, such dialog is very threatening to them, since it
will lead to increased political and social empowerment for Asians and
thus dilute their already pawltry "piece of the pie". But this is
nothing new. Throughout history, white racists have always tried to
quiet outspoken minorities, using measures such as censorship or
violence. In this newsgroup, we have already witnessed white racist
asiaphiles who have managed to successfully censor AM's who present
opinions that are distagreeable to them. I wouldn't be surprised if
one of them were to stalk and physically assault an AM poster in the
future in the manner of the Vincent Chin incident..

Having said that, let's also realize that things are not as bleak as
it would seem from reading these newsgroups. Most whites, while racist
to a degree, do not actively harm Asians. AA's are becoming empowered
politically and socially, and future improvements should become more
rapid as the growth rate in the AA population increases. This will
hopefully be accompanied by an increasing sense of pride and unity
among Asians and a decrease in autoracist sentiment among AAF's.
Remember, there are other groups worse off than us as far as racism
goes.

>If Moe and SAGE form a friendship, I will be there with two of my
>best friends: Leonard Lee and Randy Soroth. Leo is Korean-American
>married to Korean woman who also recognizes the white racism
>of anti-Asian males demonization. Randy Soroth is Cambodian
>guy married to his high-school sweetheart. He got a new baby..
>They know the impact of Asiaphile and Whiggie in this society...

With all of the whiggies running around, isn't it refreshing when you
encounter an AF who is intelligent, culturally aware, emotionally
secure and not brainwashed by white culture? If you look hard enough,
there are quite a few of them out there. Asiaphiles will always be
around as long as there are WM's. However, as AF's develop a stronger
sense of self worth, they will no longer view white culture as a "step
up" and Asiaphiles will become even more desperate and frustrated.
BTW, this mat be a good time to invest in the stocks of companies who
publish Asian porno and inflatable dolls, since there should be a
steady increase in their asiaphile customer base in the coming years.


Renee Priest

unread,
May 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/6/97
to

Michner did not write "Shogan" -- James Clavell

Don Kirkman

unread,
May 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/6/97
to

I believe that Dryfus wrote in article <5kik5a$b...@news.istar.ca>:

There's no reason to deny the truth, but there's plenty of reason to
deny idiotic theories with no evidence supporting them. And no matter
what you say, you can't equate Rushton's theories with FACT. The same
goes for your maunderings about IQ, intelligence, and race.
---
Don Kirkman [Delete NO SPAM for email]
"I know of no rights of race superior to the rights of man"
Frederick Douglass

The Native Problem

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to

On Tue, 06 May 1997 01:26:42 GMT, imb...@umuvi.com (The Native
Problem) wrote:
>
>Equality - Asians are superior in every way to all other races.
>Blacks, jews and white males are evil. Asians are the master race.
>
>Freedom - Men are free to enslave women. Women are free to obey the
>men that own them. Women who disobey should be physically assaulted.

Please allow me to add more definitions to the Sage/mckim-to-English
dictionary.

Racism - the act of disagreeing with Sage or mckim.

Racist - Any person who disagrees with Sage or mckim, or basically
just anyone mckim doesn't like for any reason.

Feminist - A deceiver twisted with a devil soul.

Malcolm - The voice that mckim hears in his head.

Imbuka
The Native Problem

Don Kirkman

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to

I believe that Renee Priest wrote in article
<01bc5a74$54af1dc0$59ee7dce@default>:

He began his career as a novelist and won a Pulitzer prize, I believe,
for "Tales of the South Pacific." (I think he was a war correspondent
and reporter before he started writing fiction.) I believe "Sayonara"
and "Bridges of Toko-Ri" also came before the book on Ukiyo-e. By that
time he was married to a Japanese American woman (a librarian from
Chicago), and I think they are still together some 40 years later. Also
don't forget that his popular fiction books include works on Hawaii,
Alaska, the steppes of Asia, Colorado, and a number of other geographic
areas.

The Native Problem

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to

On Tue, 06 May 1997 17:55:36 GMT, m...@moe.com (Moe) wrote:

>
>You're wasting your energy trying to reason with these white racist
>asiaphiles.

I don't know about asiaphiles. But I do know mckim couldn't reason
with anyone if his life depended upon it. He thinks I am a racist
because I don't like Sage's attitude about violence and the slavery of
women. I said I was opposed to idea that men should be able to own
women, and mckim called me a "racist devil." The man is an idiot.

>They don't have a clue and simply seek to impose their
>politically correct, self serving views on Asians.

Who's politically correct? mckim calls everyone who disagrees with
him a racist. Isn't that was PCers do?

>So, like cockroaches and other pests, they
>intrude into Asian newsgroups

I'm reading all of this stuff from soc.couples.intercultural. My
relationship is intercultural, though not interracial. I come on here
to talk about that, and I see this fucking Nazi idiot Sage promoting
violence as a means to end interracial relationships. Now he's
calling Asian women his property. The man is obviously criminally
insane. You may not like having drooling asiaphiles crawling all over
your group, and I respect that. If I was posting in a group about
African culture, I would not want to see a bunch of horny dickheads
asking about how to pick up black girls or making references to fried
chicken and banana farms. But I also don't like having your
misogynistic psychopath Mr_Sunshine dump his "beat the shit out of
every AF/WM couple in sight" bullshit in my group. This is
soc.couples.intercultural, not alt.psycho. Then, of course we also
get your village idiot, mckim, blindly accusing everyone he sees of
racism. Its a two sided coin. Some of your garbage is spilling over
into this group as well.

If this world lacked asiaphiles, homicidal maniacs, and illiterate
fools, I'm sure it would be a better place. It isn't.

>This will
>hopefully be accompanied by an increasing sense of pride and unity
>among Asians and a decrease in autoracist sentiment among AAF's.

Sage with his "let's control our female properties" garbage is trying
to make that IMPOSSIBLE. Do you think talking about your women in
this way will do anything to endear them to you? You should criticize
Sage for such things. Support your women for a change (they're going
to need it if Sage ever gets his way).

Imbuka
The Native Problem

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
< "There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so small that other >
< people won’t feel insecure around you." >
< -Nelson Mandela >
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

C

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to

(mckim) wrote:
> Man...this guy is just amazed me just about taking every God-Damned
> opportunty he taking from Asian culture and even has willing to
> insult Asian male. I told many Asian-Amercians to remind
> watch out all whites they are coming like hungry wolf anytime!!!

I'm glad more high IQ Asian are beginning to see it like African Americans.
We like to call them devils. We have lived among them the longest and know
them the best...this is why the are so threaten by us.



> This guy is one clear example of how White racism is perpeturated
> in Asian-American culture that we MUST MUST take care
> ourself first.

right on.

> James Michernr wrote many books mostly dealing with
> non-white americna culture such as mexican, Japanese, Phillphino.
> His books are products of the white patriarchal value becauese
> this guy is shared the value of white supremacist patriarchy.
> "Rising Sun" is stuff wrote by another white Supremacist writer
> named Michael Crichton.
>
> All these guys are very dangerous to freedom and democracy
> of the oppressed people of the world.

Right! most people think it was the white that made America free...They had
to be forced by African Americans. Stay clear of thw white devil...it is
dying and may lash out.

--
"The events which transpired five thousand years ago; Five years ago or
five minutes ago, have determined what will happen five minutes from now;
five years from now or five thousand years from now. All history is a
current event"-John Henrik Clarke

Celebrate African History.

mckim

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to

In article <337126f3...@news.alt.net>, imb...@umuvi.com says...

>
>On Tue, 06 May 1997 01:26:42 GMT, imb...@umuvi.com (The Native
>Problem) wrote:
>>
>>Equality - Asians are superior in every way to all other races.
>>Blacks, jews and white males are evil. Asians are the master race.
>>
>>Freedom - Men are free to enslave women. Women are free to obey the
>>men that own them. Women who disobey should be physically assaulted.
>
>Please allow me to add more definitions to the Sage/mckim-to-English
>dictionary.
>

Please allow Imbuke to add more defintion to his Devil Dictionary...


>Racism - the act of disagreeing with Sage or mckim.
>
>Racist - Any person who disagrees with Sage or mckim, or basically
>just anyone mckim doesn't like for any reason.
>

We got a whole new meaning of racism in Devil Dictionary..

>Feminist - A deceiver twisted with a devil soul.
>

Sound OK to me according to the Devil own word...

The Native Problem

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to

On 6 May 1997 05:29:10 GMT, mc...@ziplink.com (mckim) wrote:
>
> Unorthodox definition serve better than your racist definition even if
> you are at least right..

Well, at least you admit that I am right. (?)

Again you throw around the word "racist" very lightly. You have
called me a racist over and over again, but you have never given any
reason. You STILL have not said WHY I am not a racist. You don't
even know what the word racist means, do you? You just call me a
racist because you don't like me. You can't say why I am a racist
because YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW! That's because I am NOT a racist, you
inbred cocksucker.

You can go on and call me a racist over and over again, but it just
makes you look stupid if you can't say HOW I am racist. GO ON,
motherfucker. Back up your statements FOR ONCE. GO AHEAD. I DARE
YOU. GIVE US A QUOTE OR ADMIT THAT YOU ARE A LIAR.

MCKIM's statements are all spoken blindly and without thought. His
sickeningly liberal use of the word "racist" is a TRAVESTY to anyone
who has ACTUALLY suffered racism. Me, my family, and my people have
suffered real racism, and I don't need some asskisser like mckim
blindly calling me racist without any reason. Mckim is a weak,
spineless halfwit who doesn't know his ass from his elbow. He just
uses the word to avoid answering for his own sexism. He wouldn't know
racism if it bit him on his ass.

MCKIM is an embarrassment to humans of every race.

Imbuka
The Native Problem

na...@zilch.com

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to

To my African and Asian brothers out there let me be the first to say
that while there are whites out there who would rather see blacks and
Asians either working in the fields or some sweat shop somewhere, the
vast majority of them are very good people who don't think of
themselves as being superior to anyone. The problem arises whenver
you have a group which we refer to as trhe "haves" and another group
which are the "have nots" inevitably there is going to be some
jealousy and resentment. This isn't the only reason and I'm well
aware of it, but it is a BIG reason. If everyone had the same amount
of everything such as education, wealth, power, we wouldn't have the
problems we do. While on the one hand I think it's a good idea for
all nonwhite to get together and support one another, I think it's a
terrible idea to do it against the "white devil." Always remember, if
it weren't for white people, we wouldn't be here. We can sit around
talking about the injustices of the world until we're blue in the face
but as I'm sure many of you know, there are dictators and tyrants from
other countries who have caused far more pain and suffering than even
the worst ones in this country.

na...@zilch.com

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to

On 7 May 1997 20:09:09 GMT, "James" <je...@bellsouth.net> wrote:

>C <cybe...@hotmail.com> wrote in article
><cybersol1-ya023080...@news.csu.net>...

> You two are a hoot. A nigger and a slope trying to understand each
>other, while neither one has a grasp of the English language. One group
>can't pronounce the simple word "ASK", while the other group can't
>enunciate their "R's". I guess you two feel some sort of camaraderie
>because you pronounce the word "MASTER" in a similar manner. C says "massah
>James" and McKim says "masstah James".
>
> "McKim & C" the inter-racial comedy team, coming to a neighborhood near
>you. Like Robert Culp and Bill Cosby in "I Spy".
>
>James
>
>

Excuse me you fucking inbred peace of shit. Blacks and Asians can't
reason while faggots living in trailer parks and marrying their
cousins can? I think you should broaden your horizons and unhook mama
from the plow because you just made yourself out to be the biggest
fucking idiot on the plant you cocksucking redneck. I challenge you
to discuss any subject you deem worthy of someone with your obvious
intellectual prowess or lack thereof.

C

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to

"James" <je...@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> You two are a hoot. A nigger and a slope trying to understand each
> other, while neither one has a grasp of the English language.

How well do you speak Hausa, Korean or Chinese? ...dumb crackers think
english is the only language in the world...

>One group can't pronounce the simple word "ASK", while the other group can't
> enunciate their "R's". I guess you two feel some sort of camaraderie
> because you pronounce the word "MASTER" in a similar manner. C says "massah
> James" and McKim says "masstah James".

We will learn perfect English when you have proven the worth of your
language and culture by not screwing your 6 year-old daughters.

> "McKim & C" the inter-racial comedy team, coming to a neighborhood near
> you. Like Robert Culp and Bill Cosby in "I Spy".

How about this uranium rich South African and technologically advancing
China? It does make me kind of happy...

you dumb cracker will never know what hit you...

C

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to

The white na...@zilch.com on the usual white superiority complex wrote:

> To my African and Asian brothers

We are not you brothers.

>out there let me be the first to say
> that while there are whites out there who would rather see blacks and
> Asians either working in the fields or some sweat shop somewhere, the
> vast majority of them are very good people who don't think of
> themselves as being superior to anyone.

Did they appoint you their spokesman? You really believe you are superior
don't you? It no secret what whites think...you put it in our face
everyday.

>The problem arises whenver you have a group which we refer to as trhe
"haves" >and another group which are the "have nots" inevitably there is
going to be >some jealousy and resentment.

Tell it to the commintern.

This isn't the only reason and I'm well
> aware of it, but it is a BIG reason. If everyone had the same amount
> of everything such as education, wealth, power, we wouldn't have the
> problems we do.

You are an idiot! how many people don't know that?

>While on the one hand I think it's a good idea for
> all nonwhite to get together and support one another, I think it's a
> terrible idea to do it against the "white devil."

Why because you are one?


>Always remember, if it weren't for white people, we wouldn't be here.

Are you suggesting whites are Gods?

If it weren't for Asians we would not be sitting here.

If it weren't for Africans we would not be sitting here.

>We can sit around talking about the injustices of the world until we're
blue in >the face but as I'm sure many of you know, there are dictators and
tyrants from
> other countries who have caused far more pain and suffering than even
> the worst ones in this country.

Brought to you by the U.S. Government.

David Chou

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to

> "James" <je...@bellsouth.net> imagined:

>
> > You two are a hoot. A nigger and a slope trying to understand each
> > other, while neither one has a grasp of the English language.

While I don't know either two, *you* are so shallow and obvious I
can say I know you already. Why do you cowards always hide behind
aliases and keyboards?

> >One group can't pronounce the simple word "ASK", while the other group can't
> > enunciate their "R's". I guess you two feel some sort of camaraderie
> > because you pronounce the word "MASTER" in a similar manner. C says "massah
> > James" and McKim says "masstah James".

I would demonstrate my proficiency with r's, but there are no
cuss-words with r's in them.

You rrredneck of a wimp.

> > "McKim & C" the inter-racial comedy team, coming to a neighborhood near
> > you. Like Robert Culp and Bill Cosby in "I Spy".

You're the only clown around here, hick.

Keep posting your crap. Historians years later might point to it
as one among the many sparks which set off a 21st-century race war
in this country.

Heh-heh-heh....


Later,

----David


*


Marsupalami

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to


'Ringo' K. Wong <kit...@saul.u.washington.edu> wrote in article
<Pine.OSF.3.95.97050...@saul7.u.washington.edu>...


>
> Oh poor little Billy, you know what... I don't think any asian women that
> married to American are pretty at all. Well may be not, in your point of
> view. See that's the different !!! You can't compare people with
> different culture and background. We (all human) are the most
intelligent
> animal... well may be one's not... Sex is not everything (unlike what
you
> trying to say in your message), why don't you do us a flavor to shut up ?
>
> Thanks so much for your comments.
> Ringo

Well said, but you need a bit of polish. We should learn from each other,
not condemn. isn't that what the information highway is about? Even
though the need for sexual stimulation is very basic, we have the ability
to control that need, and push ourselves to something more.


pine

unread,
May 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/7/97
to

In article <337135...@ispy.star.ca>, "M. Taylor" <Co...@ispy.star.ca> writes:
} Democracy brings with it freedom.
}
} Freedom to be who you are and do what you like. You can say what you
} wish and must accept others doing the same. All within the
} law....these are some of the many benefits of living in a free country.
}
} It is our duty as the people to maintain our respective democracies (and
} this freedom) we must speak out against injustices and make it known
} that we will oppose those who would subject society or part of it to
} anything less than the maximum freedom under the law.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Under whose law? Do you obey the rule of law set by the
group of a few?


}
} In other news groups SC USA, British, Canada, Australia , NZ etc
} you will find many race issues under discussion. In most cases racist
} statements and slurs are refuted by people of the same race.
}
} However, I have noticed here in SCT that whatever racist remarks are
} made about white people are either actively or passively endorsed.
}
} As this subject takes up a fair bit of bandwidth anyway, it would
} supportive of democracy and decency for regulars of this group to show
} their positions on this.

M. Taylor

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

Democracy brings with it freedom.

Freedom to be who you are and do what you like. You can say what you
wish and must accept others doing the same. All within the
law....these are some of the many benefits of living in a free country.

It is our duty as the people to maintain our respective democracies (and
this freedom) we must speak out against injustices and make it known
that we will oppose those who would subject society or part of it to
anything less than the maximum freedom under the law.

In other news groups SC USA, British, Canada, Australia , NZ etc

James

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

na...@zilch.com wrote in article <33711556...@nntp.ix.netcom.com>...
> >> --
> >> "The events which transpired five thousand years ago; Five years ago
or
> >> five minutes ago, have determined what will happen five minutes from
now;
> >> five years from now or five thousand years from now. All history is a
> >> current event"-John Henrik Clarke
> >>
> >> Celebrate African History.
> >>
> >
> > You two are a hoot. A nigger and a slope trying to understand each
> >other, while neither one has a grasp of the English language. One group

> >can't pronounce the simple word "ASK", while the other group can't
> >enunciate their "R's". I guess you two feel some sort of camaraderie
> >because you pronounce the word "MASTER" in a similar manner. C says
"massah
> >James" and McKim says "masstah James".
> >
> > "McKim & C" the inter-racial comedy team, coming to a neighborhood
near
> >you. Like Robert Culp and Bill Cosby in "I Spy".
> >
> >James
> >
> >
>
> Excuse me you fucking inbred peace of shit. Blacks and Asians can't
> reason while faggots living in trailer parks and marrying their
> cousins can? I think you should broaden your horizons and unhook mama
> from the plow because you just made yourself out to be the biggest
> fucking idiot on the plant you cocksucking redneck. I challenge you
> to discuss any subject you deem worthy of someone with your obvious
> intellectual prowess or lack thereof.
>

OOH! Did I say something to make you mad, boy? I should broaden my
horizons? "....fucking inbred piece of shit"??? "....faggots living in
trailer parks and marrying their cousins can."??? "....unhook mama from
the plow."??? Your broad horizons have lent themselves to your intelligent
post. The only thing obvious is your vast vocabulary. "...cocksucking
redneck." Let's
discuss your lack of education. Let's discuss the reason that you failed to
get your high school diploma. Let's discuss your obvious knowledge of
things like "inbred pieces of shit". or of "faggots living in trailer
parks". or of "marrying your cousin", or of "using your mama as a farm
animal" when that is a position usually limited to niggers or slopes, or
how about it if we discuss your obvious knowledge of "..cocksucking".
Better yet, discuss these things with your therapist or your token
nigger. I really have wasted too much time in response, but thanks for
sharing your thoughts. So, in short, "fucKKKyou".

James

mckim

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

In article <3379ea7a...@news.alt.net>, imb...@umuvi.com says...
>
>
>MCKIM, you are a louse. You, with your delusions of persecution,
>cheapen the suffering of people who are REALLY facing racism. People
>who are OPPRESSED because of their race. But merely because I
>DISAGREE WITH YOU, you call me a racist. I criticize you and sage,
>and you think I'm criticizing all Asian males, but I'm not. My
>critiques of you are of you alone. Stop being paranoid.
>

called me idiot before, now you called me louse person... You might ran out of adjective
somedays... This is not about disagreement. This is not about you do not see
the way I see. This is not about you weren't in my shoes. This is not about
lack of sympathy. This is not even about emotion. What are these about you?

These are about YOU compliciting the line of white racist/supremacist.

Here are some facts I accused you as the pathetic racist:

issue 1: you called SAGE or ME treating women as a property

issue 2: you called Asian male using baseball to beat up female

issue 3: you called SAGE compatible person to Ted Bundy

issue 4: You called me GET THE FUCK

i ssue 5: you labelled me misogynist

issue 6: you said Asians are superior to all others.


Explanations:

Issue 1: nobody should criticize any asian-american male's using women as
the property. Here the problem is people of Asians and whites
do not understand the underline assumption of word "Property." Some
misguided White-power feminists here have occasionally
misused this word before in attempt to further demonize Asian male.
I found these people very *mind-bugging* because they don't seem
to understand the geniue structure of mainstream American society
found by the individual's belief on ownership of the property.
The historical fact is America was econonmically prosperous
by owning something including human being. This is the way
they ( white masters) have had the slavery because black slaves were treated
as the physically property not as human being. Women and children
were considered owned by male. of course white males.
Now this concept of *ownership of perperty * is so deeply rooted in the
America belief system. It is the American way to own something. It is
the mainstream american way...how can we sit here so pathologically
accused asian male for using woman as the property without
ever looking at the system these people support and rely on?
Who are the real owner of the women property?

Issue 2:
now this is rather very amuzing imbuka talking aboug using baseball bat...
This reminds me of Vincent Chin case, the Asian guy severely beaten to
dead by a baseball bat by two white males racist. These guys were Detroit
local baseball player carrying baseball bat in their car and used at
the right time. And the murders walked on free...talk about racist
US system..

Issue 3:
By Imbuka calling SAGE the mass murder as Ted Bunder was is
like assulting 6 inches knife on back of the SAGE. This is classic
example of the past white racist regime to demonize asian male.
Remember the past asian males often labelled as a rapist,
criminal, opium addict, and all kind of negatives connotating
implied to the character of asian male by mainstream
white american society.... hey Imbuka wants to carry same torch...


Issue 4:
Now I am not going to explain this. This is very easy..
Any white telling Asian-american to go back to their origin
is simply perpeturating same old line of white racist.
Yeah.. sure.. Asians are all foreigners and white are
all native. Talk about real racism..


Issue 5:
This issue needs detailed two explanations why I should
not be labelled as misogynist. First, as I had said before
I am a follower of Native American spirit. I believe
my God is female who is the MotherEarth. Usually
most followers of MotherEarth do NOT treated
the women as the property or any way to
subdue her as inferior being. To do that is
against my God the MotherEarth. Having said this,
other reason I am not misogynist is I do not
belong to mainstream white society. The mainstream
american is the society of misogynist. To understand
going back to past sexist history of america when any woman
whether white or black was treated as the second
class citizen. She was the criminal the dirty evil , in
the eye of white male dominated culture.
Why white American colonical society subdue women?
To understand this, we need further go back again when
women in Europe were portrayed as witch and basically
staking the women in public in the name of Christan God.
American society is the extend version
of the Darkage which polarized the man
and woman into two opposite being.

Issue 6:
Who said Asians are superior?


You see Imbuka... you used the exact line of white racist of
the past to damage my character . It ain'g going to work because
I am too smart. I know all the tricks by typical
white american trickster. I have 360 angle. You have only
90 angle. I see the past of white american . I see them the present.
I see them the future. I even see you as who you really are.


mckim

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to
>BTW, if you are such a big fan of Malcolm X, why do you like Sage so
>much. Sage stated that he hates blacks even more than he hates whites
>(see quote at bottom). What do you think Malcolm would think of that?
>
>Imbuka
>The Native Problem
>


Who said I liked SAGE? It is not the issue of liking him or not.
I do not agree with 100% what he said. There are some
issues I didn't like him standing on that particular issue. But
that is not the problem because I agree him the more than
the disagreement. And he is not the source of the problem.
He even supplied the hard truth. The truth that is
rather so painful to admit because we have been
brainwashed by the promise of Americna propaganda
like Freedom and Democratcy and other lip serivce
nonsense. And we love to believe these lie and propaganda.
Again the real truth I would to see the first is we need
the SEPARATION.


>-----
>In "Asians Good, Hispanics No Good," Sage wrote:
>"I hated Hispanics (who I used to refer to as "Messicans" and
>"Wetbacks") the most, followed by blacks (need I mention what
>term I used to refer to them?), and then whites."


mckim

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

In article <01bc5b22$b7d904c0$4e0535cf@uv>, je...@bellsouth.net says...

>
>
> You two are a hoot. A nigger and a slope trying to understand each
>other, while neither one has a grasp of the English language. One group
>can't pronounce the simple word "ASK", while the other group can't
>enunciate their "R's". I guess you two feel some sort of camaraderie
>because you pronounce the word "MASTER" in a similar manner. C says "massah
>James" and McKim says "masstah James".
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

No, McKim says James the racist scumbag liar.
HEY SCUMBAG ....I DON'T WRITE ENGLISH LIKE YOU!!!
STOP LYING!!!


Dave Cho

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

James wrote:
> OOH! Did I say something to make you mad, boy? I should broaden my
> horizons? "....fucking inbred piece of shit"??? "....faggots living in
> trailer parks and marrying their cousins can."??? "....unhook mama from
> the plow."??? Your broad horizons have lent themselves to your intelligent
> post. The only thing obvious is your vast vocabulary. "...cocksucking
> redneck." Let's
> discuss your lack of education. Let's discuss the reason that you failed to
> get your high school diploma. Let's discuss your obvious knowledge of
> things like "inbred pieces of shit". or of "faggots living in trailer
> parks". or of "marrying your cousin", or of "using your mama as a farm
> animal" when that is a position usually limited to niggers or slopes, or
> how about it if we discuss your obvious knowledge of "..cocksucking".
> Better yet, discuss these things with your therapist or your token
> nigger. I really have wasted too much time in response, but thanks for
> sharing your thoughts. So, in short, "fucKKKyou".
>
> James

It's good to see you are getting in touch with yourself, thanKKK you.

Thomas Ellis

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to Moe

McKim,

Why do you call people Asiaphiles? What do you call Asian people who
love Western culture? Challatdas?

Dan Bennett

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

In <337135...@ispy.star.ca> "M. Taylor" <Co...@ispy.star.ca> writes:


>Democracy brings with it freedom.

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch.


--
Dan Bennett, Unreconstructed Southron
....
"The moralities accepted among men may differ - though not,
at bottom, so widely as is often claimed - but they all
agree in prescribing a behaviour which their adherents
fail to practise. All men alike stand condemned, not by
alien codes of ethics, but by their own, and all men
therefore are conscious of guilt. -- C.S. Lewis

Dan Bennett

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

In <5krpc4$lrj$1...@kayrad.ziplink.net> mc...@ziplink.com (mckim) writes:

> called me idiot before, now you called me louse person...

I think he's cutting you a little slack because you're so young.

> issue 1: you called SAGE or ME treating women as a property

You did, and do. If you didn't believe it, you shouldn't have said it.

> issue 2: you called Asian male using baseball to beat up female

"Sage" claims to be Asian, and that was his suggestion. You call that
"fighting for liberty". Right.

> issue 3: you called SAGE compatible person to Ted Bundy

If the shoe fits...

> i ssue 5: you labelled me misogynist

Since you by your own words see women as property, and since you see
fit to fly to the defense of a misogynistic swine who advocates
violence against women, that's a logical conclusion. You keep qucking
like a duck, it isn't too surprising if people think you're a duck.

> issue 6: you said Asians are superior to all others.

He attributed that opinion to you and your storm-trooping buddies, Sage
and Moe.

> Issue 1: nobody should criticize any asian-american male's using
>women as the property.

Spoken like a true neanderthal.

> Here the problem is people of Asians and whites
> do not understand the underline assumption of word "Property."

<ROFL> This oughtta be rich...

> Some
> misguided White-power feminists here have occasionally
> misused this word before in attempt to further demonize Asian male.

It doesn't appear to be necessary to demonise Asian males like
yourself. You appear to be doing an exemplary job on your own.

<Rambling attempt at diversion snipped>

> This issue needs detailed two explanations why I should
> not be labelled as misogynist. First, as I had said before
> I am a follower of Native American spirit. I believe
> my God is female who is the MotherEarth. Usually
> most followers of MotherEarth do NOT treated
> the women as the property

Although by your words a few lines above here, you shouldn't be
criticised for viewing women as property. Make up your mind, boy.

>or any way to subdue her as inferior being. To do that is
> against my God the MotherEarth. Having said this,
> other reason I am not misogynist is I do not
>belong to mainstream white society.

Ah, I see. It's OK for YOU to view women as property, since you ain't
white. If whites do it, it's bad. Makes perfect sense, I suppose. To
you.

ROADRUNNER

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

In article <5ksk0e$t...@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com>, rdbe...@ix.netcom.com(Dan Bennett) writes:
> In <337135...@ispy.star.ca> "M. Taylor" <Co...@ispy.star.ca> writes:
>
>
>>Democracy brings with it freedom.
>
> Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch.

This is call the American democracy.


\
\
\
\
\ --

\
\

mckim

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

In article <5ksknj$c...@dfw-ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>, rdbe...@ix.netcom.co says...

>
>In <5krpc4$lrj$1...@kayrad.ziplink.net> mc...@ziplink.com (mckim) writes:
>
>> called me idiot before, now you called me louse person...
>
>I think he's cutting you a little slack because you're so young.
>
>> issue 1: you called SAGE or ME treating women as a property
>
>You did, and do. If you didn't believe it, you shouldn't have said it.
>

FUCK YOU!!

>> issue 2: you called Asian male using baseball to beat up female
>

>"Sage" claims to be Asian, and that was his suggestion. You call that
>"fighting for liberty". Right.
>

FUNK YOU!!

>> issue 3: you called SAGE compatible person to Ted Bundy
>

>If the shoe fits...
>

FUCK YOU!!

>> i ssue 5: you labelled me misogynist
>

>Since you by your own words see women as property, and since you see
>fit to fly to the defense of a misogynistic swine who advocates
>violence against women, that's a logical conclusion. You keep qucking
>like a duck, it isn't too surprising if people think you're a duck.
>

FUCK YOU!!

>> issue 6: you said Asians are superior to all others.
>

>He attributed that opinion to you and your storm-trooping buddies, Sage
>and Moe.
>

FUCK YOU!!

>> Issue 1: nobody should criticize any asian-american male's using
>>women as the property.
>

>Spoken like a true neanderthal.
>

FUCK YOU!!


>> Here the problem is people of Asians and whites
>> do not understand the underline assumption of word "Property."
>

><ROFL> This oughtta be rich...
>

>> Some
>> misguided White-power feminists here have occasionally
>> misused this word before in attempt to further demonize Asian male.
>

>It doesn't appear to be necessary to demonise Asian males like
>yourself. You appear to be doing an exemplary job on your own.
>

FUCK YOU!!!

><Rambling attempt at diversion snipped>
>

>> This issue needs detailed two explanations why I should
>> not be labelled as misogynist. First, as I had said before
>> I am a follower of Native American spirit. I believe
>> my God is female who is the MotherEarth. Usually
>> most followers of MotherEarth do NOT treated
>> the women as the property
>

>Although by your words a few lines above here, you shouldn't be
>criticised for viewing women as property. Make up your mind, boy.
>

>>or any way to subdue her as inferior being. To do that is
>> against my God the MotherEarth. Having said this,
>> other reason I am not misogynist is I do not
>>belong to mainstream white society.
>

>Ah, I see. It's OK for YOU to view women as property, since you ain't
>white. If whites do it, it's bad. Makes perfect sense, I suppose. To
>you.
>

FUCK YOU!!!

See..Takes exactly 5 seconds to rebut your trash mouths..
My trashes equalize your trashes...


Count Zero Interrupt

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

mckim (mc...@ziplink.com) wrote:
: See..Takes exactly 5 seconds to rebut your trash mouths..

Unfortunately, that's not a rebuttal, that's a forfeit.

Ryan :>
--
"When a Spark comes online, there's great joy."

The Native Problem

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

On 8 May 1997 05:46:44 GMT, mc...@ziplink.com (mckim) wrote:

> called me idiot before, now you called me louse person... You might ran out of adjective

That's not an adjective, you damn idiot! It's a NOUN! GOD DAMN, THIS
GUY IS SO FUCKING STUPID!

> somedays... This is not about disagreement.

Yes it is. You and Sage used the word "property" to refer to women.
I disagree. Sage said his race is genetically superior to mine. I
disagree. Sage supports violence. I disagree.

> This is not about you do not see
> the way I see. This is not about you weren't in my shoes. This is not about
> lack of sympathy. This is not even about emotion. What are these about you?

They are about me criticizing sage, a man who believes in 1) The
genetic superiority of Asians 2) Violence as a means of ending
interracial relationships 3) The ownership of women by men.

He has written about all of these things.

>
>These are about YOU compliciting the line of white racist/supremacist.

Sage and you are the ones that want racial separation, which is what
the Shite Supremacists also want. You and Sage are the ones kissing
the asses of Aryan Nations and the KKK. You and they want the same
thing, division. This IS about me not thinking like you.

>
> Here are some facts I accused you as the pathetic racist:

None of your facts bear out. All I have done is quoted SAGE and YOU
and used those words against you. Sage is the one who talked about
beating women with a baseball bat. Sage is the one who talked about
running a couple down with his car. Sage is the one who called black
men swarthy apes. Sage is the one who said Asian men should control
their female properties. Sage is the one who said Asians are
genetically superior to all other races. And you call ME the racist
after Sage said that his people are genetically superior to mine...
after he called my people swarthy apes. FUCK YOU, you little
cocksucker. Do you think Malcolm X would give you the time of day
after you kissed Sage's ass in this thread?

> issue 1: you called SAGE or ME treating women as a property

Well, Sage and you were the ones who called Asian women your property,
not me. I don't know if you "treat" women as property. But you do
refer to them as property.

> issue 2: you called Asian male using baseball to beat up female

SAGE is the one who said he wanted to take a baseball bat and beat the
shit out of every AF/WM couple in sight (his exact words). SAGE is
the one who brought the baseball bat into this whole thign. You don't
like it, take it up with sage.

I even gave you the exact quote were SAGE said this, you still you are
too stupid to understand what I was saying. Pathetic.

>
> issue 3: you called SAGE compatible person to Ted Bundy

As far as I am concerned, anyone who would fantasize about
beating a woman with a baseball bat is very similar to Ted
Bundy and is a very dangerous person. Once again, SAGE said
it. You cannot deny that he said it because it is there on Deja News
for you to see.

Sage's fantasies of violence against women make him very similar to
men like Ted Bundy.

> i ssue 5: you labelled me misogynist

Men who call women their property are misogynists. If you are using
some different mystical definition of property, then I apologize.
Sage spoke of controlling and beating women. He is a misogynist.

> issue 6: you said Asians are superior to all others.

Sage has said this on numerous occasions. He has admitted to hating
hispanics, blacks and whites. If you don't think Asians are superior,
fine. Sage does.

Sage wrote, "Our children deserve a safe environment that is conducive
to the full development of their superior innate abilities."

SUPERIOR INNATE ABILITIES. Sage thinks Asians are genetically
superior to all other races. If you don't think that, fine. Stop
defending Sage if you don't even know what he has said.

>
> Explanations:

Nothing you brought up was relevant to the FACT that both SAGE
and you have called Asian women property. If you don't consider
women to be your property, why do you call them property? You words
are still there in s.c.a.a. Think before you write.

>
> Issue 2:
> now this is rather very amuzing imbuka talking aboug using baseball bat...
> This reminds me of Vincent Chin case, the Asian guy severely beaten to
> dead by a baseball bat by two white males racist.

I think that is a horrible crime, just as it was a horrible crime
when those Asian youths beat up that interracial couple. SAGE is
the one that brought that incident up, and suggested he would
give money to men who did the same thing. I am only going by
SAGE's words.

Let me make this perfectly clear. I ABHOR violence against anyone,
especially for racial reasons. I would think that the Chin case would
make you all the more eager to CRITICIZE Sage for talking about
beating women with baseball bats. I would think perhaps that horrible
crime would have made you learn a lesson. If you want to criticize
him for it... feel free to do it now.

No? Did think so. You, mckim, are not strong enough to stand up to
Sage.

>Issue 3:
> By Imbuka calling SAGE the mass murder as Ted Bunder was is
> like assulting 6 inches knife on back of the SAGE.

So sage is your martyr now. SAGE is a racist asshole. The way
he has spoken about my people, I feel I have every right to hate him.
And HE said he thought about running over a couple with his car and
fantasized about beating them with a baseball bat. Only a dangerous
lunatic like Ted Bundy would think such a thoughts.

Considering Sage's views on genetic superiority, jews and every other
race under the sun, it would probably be more apt to compare him to
Charles Manson.

>Issue 4:
> Now I am not going to explain this. This is very easy..
> Any white telling Asian-american to go back to their origin
>is simply perpeturating same old line of white racist.
>Yeah.. sure.. Asians are all foreigners and white are
> all native. Talk about real racism..

I didn't tell you to go back to your origin. I said if you want to
live in a country where women have no rights, go to one. If you think
women should have rights, go ahead and stay. That's your business.
Just don't try to take away their rights. Sage's words cannot be
ignored. He said Asian men should control their female properties.
They are not yours to control. Live with it.

>Issue 5:
> This issue needs detailed two explanations why I should

If you were truly not a misogynist, you would not support sage, who
claimed he would financially and morally support any Asian males who
inflicted violence upon an Asian female dating interracially (I'm not
making that up. Check Deja News for the full article). You should
also stop referring to women as property.

>Issue 6:
> Who said Asians are superior?

SAGE DID, you fucking IDIOT. He has said it over and over again.
Learn to READ. Let me repeat it for you a couple of times.

Sage wrote, "Our children deserve a safe environment that is conducive
to the full development of their superior innate abilities."

Sage wrote, "Our children deserve a safe environment that is conducive
to the full development of their superior innate abilities."

Sage wrote, "Our children deserve a safe environment that is conducive
to the full development of their superior innate abilities."

Sage wrote, "Our children deserve a safe environment that is conducive
to the full development of their superior innate abilities."

Sage wrote, "Our children deserve a safe environment that is conducive
to the full development of their superior innate abilities."

Sage wrote, "Our children deserve a safe environment that is conducive
to the full development of their superior innate abilities."

Got it now, mckim?

Imbuka
The Native Problem

Check

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to


mckim <mc...@ziplink.com> wrote in article
<5krq04$lrj$2...@kayrad.ziplink.net>...


> In article <3379ea7a...@news.alt.net>, imb...@umuvi.com says...
> >
> >

> >BTW, if you are such a big fan of Malcolm X, why do you like Sage so
> >much. Sage stated that he hates blacks even more than he hates whites
> >(see quote at bottom). What do you think Malcolm would think of that?
> >
> >Imbuka
> >The Native Problem
> >
>
>
> Who said I liked SAGE? It is not the issue of liking him or not.
> I do not agree with 100% what he said. There are some
> issues I didn't like him standing on that particular issue. But
> that is not the problem because I agree him the more than
> the disagreement. And he is not the source of the problem.
> He even supplied the hard truth. The truth that is
> rather so painful to admit because we have been
> brainwashed by the promise of Americna propaganda
> like Freedom and Democratcy and other lip serivce
> nonsense. And we love to believe these lie and propaganda.
> Again the real truth I would to see the first is we need
> the SEPARATION.


You know McKim- How long have you been in the states?

Either one-

1) You have only recently arrived and therefore you have'nt even given the
system time enough to fail you.
(This option also makes you somewhat of an ingrate in my book since your
complaining so loudly so soon.)

or

2) You've been here for many years and have never even taken the time to
learn the language-
and not knowing the language makes all your observations tainted.

How many of your problems are due to your poor level of communication
skills?

I think it would be a good idea if you had some help with your english
before you post it because-

1) Your arguments could be taken a little more seriously

and

2) You would learn english which wouldn't be such a bad thing now would
it?

If you can't find anyone to help you- e-mail me- I'll help. I might also
suggest some american friends who speak the language as well. Somebody
here in the states arguing for separation who speaks so poorly is a bit
humorous in my book.

HeadedTo...@dinner.time

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

David Chou <dc...@shiva.Hunter.CUNY.EDU> wrote:

> Keep posting your crap. Historians years later might point to it
> as one among the many sparks which set off a 21st-century race war
> in this country.

> Heh-heh-heh....


One might note in passing that the "21st century race war in this
country" you allude to is as desirable to many of us as it is to you,
David.

It would clear the air, and one assumes it would be winner take all.

Your post was literate and amusing, hence, I assume you're not foolish
enough to think that the high white handgun, shotgun, assault rifle
and ammunition sales indicate a sudden surge of bunny hunters, or that
the shooting ranges (where whites are 99 percent of the shooters) are
being used for recreational purposes.

We see it the same way you do.

Heh-heh-heh...

See you in the field, ;->


I. Choe

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to ch...@halcyon.com

Check,

I've read many of your posts -- I disagree with some, but I did agree with
as many if not more...

But this attack on McKim's command of English is downright low-brow,
Check... True, McKim's posts are a bit difficult to understand because he
ignores (either by choice or otherwise, we don't know) conventional
grammar... Nevertheless, he gets his points across and that's what
matters... If anything, I commend McKim for taking courage to write
as he does despite his seemingly incomplete mastery of the English
language.

Who knows maybe McKim has decided not to master the minute details of
the English grammar as either a resistance or as a lost cause? Again, he
DOES get his points across, which indicates to me that he's in possession
of enough communication skills...

Furthermore, McKim's views are commonly echoed among the scholars I
learned from while an undergraduate at UC Berkeley... Of course, those
scholars are perfectly well situated within the confines of Western
pedagogy -- which presupposes complete mastery of written English... Why
are their views of America so "tainted" then despite their impeccable
English?

Check, this post of yours is in stark contrast with your other -- very
often eloquently written -- posts; as an American is wont to say, you "hit
below the belt" this time...

Again, if it bothers you so much, I'll volunteer to edit McKim's posts for
you and others who are so fastidious about your langauage...

Ian Choe


> mckim <mc...@ziplink.com> wrote in article

> > He even supplied the hard truth. The truth that is
> > rather so painful to admit because we have been
> > brainwashed by the promise of Americna propaganda
> > like Freedom and Democratcy and other lip serivce
> > nonsense. And we love to believe these lie and propaganda.
> > Again the real truth I would to see the first is we need
> > the SEPARATION.
>
> You know McKim- How long have you been in the states?
>
> Either one-
>
> 1) You have only recently arrived and therefore you have'nt even given the
> system time enough to fail you.
> (This option also makes you somewhat of an ingrate in my book since your
> complaining so loudly so soon.)
>
> or
>
> 2) You've been here for many years and have never even taken the time to
> learn the language-
> and not knowing the language makes all your observations tainted.
>
> How many of your problems are due to your poor level of communication
> skills?
>
> I think it would be a good idea if you had some help with your english
> before you post it because-
> 1) Your arguments could be taken a little more seriously

James

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to

mckim <mc...@ziplink.com> wrote in article
<5krrhp$lrj$3...@kayrad.ziplink.net>...
That's "...lacist scumbag riah" to you chinaboy. Whatsamatta you boy. No
speak English velly good? Good chinaboy know how say "niggah". I not rying.
You rying. STOP RYING!!!

James

Mitoshi Matsushita a.k.a. Baby Mit

unread,
May 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/8/97
to James

> You two are a hoot. A nigger and a slope trying to understand each
> other, while neither one has a grasp of the English language. One group
> can't pronounce the simple word "ASK", while the other group can't
> enunciate their "R's". I guess you two feel some sort of camaraderie
> because you pronounce the word "MASTER" in a similar manner. C says "massah
> James" and McKim says "masstah James".
>
> "McKim & C" the inter-racial comedy team, coming to a neighborhood near
> you. Like Robert Culp and Bill Cosby in "I Spy".
>
> James


I try very hard to figure out why guys like you are so angry all the
time, but I can't. Why are you so angry? Are you jealous of Asians?
Are you angry because whites have lower IQs than Asians? Is it because
Asians are more successful than whites? Is it because Asians are better
educated? Why are you so angry? I'll bet you're only high-school
educated, right? Go to college. Study more. Perhaps knowing just a
little bit more than what you learned in high school might help ease
your anger.

The Native Problem

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

On Wed, 07 May 1997 02:39:51 -0700, cybe...@hotmail.com (C) wrote:

>(mckim) wrote:
<Praise of mckim snipped>

Mckim also said in the article <5kjt5v$r61$1...@kayrad.ziplink.net> that
Sage/Mr.Sunshine is "fighting for the EQUALITY and FREEDOM which is
is more than a civil right, but a human right." Judging by mckim,
you'd think Sage was a real hero. Here are some things that Sage has
said about freedom and equality. Then we'll see how "eye to eye"
Africans are to mckim and Sage.

The following are all quotes from various S_A...@hotmail.com and
Mr_Su...@hotmail.com articles. For full text, see deja news.
-----

The attraction that many white women have for Negroid men attests to
the
sexual perversion rampant in the Caucasian race. White women who
pursue
black men probably harbor a subconscious desire to have sex with
animals.
Because of their simian physical features and their social
acceptability, black men have become a convenient target for
sublimation
of white women's bestial impulses.

------

No, I blame all the white women who go after Black men, leaving white
losers like yourself to prey on our women. What the fuck is wrong
with
your women? Why are they picking swarthy ape-like Negroid males over
you?
Are there some white male inadequacies that we should know about?

-----

> >so basically WM > AM = BM > AF > WF > BF, roughly, in terms of income.
>
> Are you sure? I think you might have BM and BF's positions reversed.

Not if you consider the cost of incarcerating BMs as their incomes.
One
out of every four BM's between the ages of 18 and 35 (and 1 of 7 of
all
BMs) are in prison at a annual cost of $45,000 a piece.

> >gosh if only i could find that damn page again, i would have more
> >confidence, i don't remember exactly if AM and BM made roughly the
> >same amount (i.e. +/- $500), but i think so.

Asian males on average have IQ's 10-15 points higher than black males.

If AMs make about the same as BMs (or as BFs), doesn't this mean that
Asian males are under-achievers?

---------------

> Most immigrant entrepreneurs are unwilling to hire black or
> latino employees.

If you have your own business, you'd understand why.

-----

Chucky, you pathetic dumbfuck, I have stated in the post that my IQ is
192% that of the average Negroid. If you don't know what yours is, go
to
http://www.brain.com/ and take their free online IQ test. I'm sure it
will be a humbling experience for you.

-SAGE

------


There has been quite a bit of discussion lately about the surge of
Asian
American and Hispanic populations in America. It is predicted that by
the
year 2050 whites will cease to be the majority in the US. While I
welcome
the growth of the Asian American population, I am not too thrilled
about
that of the Latino population. I, for one, do not want to see my kids
grow up in the "barr-i-os" infested by gangsters, crime, and
prostitution.
I grew up in a neighborhood made up of roughly 1/3 whites, 1/3 blacks,
and
1/3 hispanics, and of these races, I hated Hispanics (who I used to


refer
to as "Messicans" and "Wetbacks") the most, followed by blacks (need I
mention what term I used to refer to them?), and then whites.

From my perfectly multicultural upbringing, I can predict with
absolute
certainty that the surge in the Hispanic population, coupled with the
steady rise of the negroid population, will prove disastrous to this
country. With the Miami's and Harlems springing up everywhere in this
country, America is gradually degenerating into a third-world nation,
until it reaches a state like the present-day Brazil, or even Mexico!

The decline of America is inevitable because Latinos and Blacks simply
do
not have the genetic materials to sustain a first-world civilization.
Need proof? Just look at Central America, South America, and Africa.
While there are several Asian countries that have matched or even
surpassed the West in economic prosperity and living standard, there
is
none from South America, Latin America, or Africa that can be
considered a
first-world nation. Even though South America and Latin America are
rich
in natural resources; their slow rates of development suggest that
they
are a little lacking in the intellectual resources.

To avoid being dragged into the slum conditions of a third-world
nation,
the more "evolved" races like Asians and whites should demand separate
ethnic homelands for themselves. Those multiculturalists who would
like to
see America mongrelized can have their own nation, also. Let's face
it:
the white supremacists are not the only ones who want their own
homeland;
even the Latinos and Blacks want to be segregated, as evidenced by the
profusion of barrios and ghettos in urban areas. Unlike the white
supremacists, however, the Latinos and Blacks want their segregrated
societies to be FUNDED by the rest of America.

Well, like it or not, this is just my perspective on the current
demographics changes in America. BTW, all of my gardeners are
Hispanic,
so don't even *think* about calling me a racist.

- SAGE
-----


Our children deserve a safe environment that is conducive to the full

development of their superior innate abilities. How is this to occur
if
they are constantly caught in the crossfires of Negroid tribal
warefares?
We must isolate our people from the influences of rap music, hip-hop,
and
other primitive cultural elements. We must refrain from obscene and
unbecoming bodily gestures, such as walking idly with one hand on the
crotch and speaking with our heads undulating from side to side.
These
behaviors are simply incompatible with our level of evolutionary
development.

-----


Still seeing eye to eye?

Imbuka
The Native Problem

your name

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

Please excuse..private room for rent
Near I35 South and I20 (817) 551 5474
thirty-five minutes from dfw airport

C

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

"Mitoshi Matsushita a.k.a. Baby Mit" wrote:

> I try very hard to figure out why guys like you are so angry all the
> time, but I can't. Why are you so angry?

His race is dying and there is nothing he can do about it.

>Are you jealous of Asians?

Of course he is...the ave. white only has the outdated dream of white
supremacy to cling on to.

> Are you angry because whites have lower IQs than Asians?

The funny thing is whites made the test! Imagine if he took an Asian IQ
test...negative numbers!

>Is it because Asians are more successful than whites?

The white hates its own pale ugly skin and must lash out at God and nature
for its lack of beauty in a world full of it.

>Is it because Asians are better educated?

I have seen white boy drop a class because "there were too many Asians o
raise the curve."

>Why are you so angry?

He is a loser and will always be one. He probably has an Asian boss.

>I'll bet you're only high-school educated, right?

right!

>Go to college. Study more. Perhaps knowing just a little bit more than
what you >learned in high school might help ease your anger.

good post!

C

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

(mckim) wrote:
>Yes, the Devil Dictionary says I am the
> supremacist just because I want respect and equality.

You nailed it!

HeadedTo...@dinner.time

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

cybe...@hotmail.com (C) wrote:

> HeadedTo...@Dinner.Time wrote:
>> One might note in passing that the "21st century race war in this
>> country" you allude to is as desirable to many of us as it is to you,
>> David.
>>
>> It would clear the air, and one assumes it would be winner take all.
>>
>> Your post was literate and amusing, hence, I assume you're not foolish
>> enough to think that the high white handgun, shotgun, assault rifle
>> and ammunition sales indicate a sudden surge of bunny hunters, or that
>> the shooting ranges (where whites are 99 percent of the shooters) are
>> being used for recreational purposes.
>>
>> We see it the same way you do.
>>
>> Heh-heh-heh...
>>
>> See you in the field, ;->

>And you will be shitting in your pants.

I have never seen a homie do anything that would make me shit my
pants, other than the possibility that ya'll linin' up at de
massa-mobiles to gits yo' "paychecks" afa yo bunrz down de'
pos'offices in yo' hoods afa de' "rebellion" might have made me laugh
so hard I'd have shit them - had I had to go.

>Do you have the latest data on the percentage of non-whites in the Armed forces?

Have you noticed how often we've had our asses handed to us on a plate
since we let your numbers in-service get so high?

Can't fight, can't think, can do the hand-jive...

Now there's a serious threat for ya'...

All those homies trying to hand-jive us to death.

Celebrate imitation africans like C with made in the USA tattoo'd on
on one asscheek, and "members of the armed forces welcome here"
tattoo'd on the other.


censo...@hotmail.com

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

In article <33731cc2...@news.alt.net>,

imb...@umuvi.com (The Native Problem) wrote:
>
> Yes it is. You and Sage used the word "property" to refer to women.
> I disagree. Sage said his race is genetically superior to mine. I
> disagree. Sage supports violence. I disagree.


Imbuka (or whatever the hell your name is):

First of all, are you a hemmoroid? Well, then G E T O F F M Y A S
S!!!!! I resent your persistent defamation of my character and my views.
You have falsely accused me of advocating violence against women despite
my repeated appeal to Asian youths to exercise restraint and to explore
alternative solutions. I have posted the message "Attention AA Women:
Interracial..." not to threaten violence against Asian women but to raise
awareness among Asian American women about the possible consequences of
their whoring. I think Asian women deserve to be warned about their
reckless behaviors.

Another problem that I have with your mindless attacks is that you, among
others, have made me out to be the bad guy for speculating the rise of
violence against racist AF/WM couples. I do not condone violence; nor
can I make a moral judgement against anyone who is involved in these
incidences. As I have mentioned in my post, I think it all parties
involved in these unfortunate incidences are equally victimized. I can't
believe that you have the gall to denounce Asian males for administering
violence on AF/WM couples. This is not a moral issue, so your
holier-than-thou posturing adds nothing positive to the discussion. I
think it is important for people to try to understand the rage that
drives Asian male youths to take actions against what they percieve to be
racist and indecent. I think that your time is more wisely spent by
helping me to send a clear message to Asian women that their whoring can
no longer be tolerated. Let it be known that we Asian males shall not
further tolerate their cheapening of our race. We shall resist their
pernicious campaign of autogenocide against the Mongoloid race in
America, by Machiavellian means if necessary.

As for my stance on Asian superiority, well, we *are* superior in
intelligence. The facts speak for themselves: Mongoloids exhibit higher
mean IQ's than other races. While I understand that the worth of a man
cannot be based on his intelligence alone, I argue that higher
intelligence is preferable to, say, larger penises.

- SAGE

-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet

Dan Bennett

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

In <8631690...@dejanews.com> censo...@hotmail.com writes:

>First of all, are you a hemmoroid?

I think that description would more accurately fit YOU, a slimy coward
who makes up for his complete lack of male genitalia by advocating
violence against women.

>I resent your persistent defamation of my character and my views.

Your malignant character is adequately represented by your
reprehensible views. You're pond scum.

>You have falsely accused me of advocating violence against women

Falsely, hell. Everyone here has seen your trash, as witness below...

<snip>

> I can't believe that you have the gall to denounce Asian males for
>administering violence on AF/WM couples.

> This is not a moral issue

Not to you, since you have no morals. Invertebrates never do.

Check

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to


I. Choe <ic...@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu> wrote in article
<Pine.A41.3.95.970508...@black.weeg.uiowa.edu>...

Ian-


I appreciate your comments. You are probably right when you say that this
is not the most worthy way to reply to an otherwise well-meaning person.

But when someone makes a statement about racial separation within this
country, those words are akin to a call to war. That's is flaming with the
worst possible potential consequences.

And I guess it annoys me that someone would not make the effort to
conjugate properly but would still not hesitate to make blanket damning
indictments of his 'chosen' country- comments that offend the many
americans who wish him no ill will.

But on retrospect you are probably correct. My argument could be used to
effectively discriminate against anybody no matter how good a case they
represented.

So while I still may be a bit annoyed, I nonetheless retreat. You are
correct, sir.


Check


>

M. Taylor

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

censo...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> In article <33731cc2...@news.alt.net>,
> imb...@umuvi.com (The Native Problem) wrote:
> >
> > Yes it is. You and Sage used the word "property" to refer to women.
> > I disagree. Sage said his race is genetically superior to mine. I
> > disagree. Sage supports violence. I disagree.
>
> Imbuka (or whatever the hell your name is):
>
> First of all, are you a hemmoroid? Well, then G E T O F F M Y A S
> S!!!!! I resent your persistent defamation of my character and my views.

> You have falsely accused me of advocating violence against women despite
> my repeated appeal to Asian youths to exercise restraint and to explore
> alternative solutions. I have posted the message "Attention AA Women:
> Interracial..." not to threaten violence against Asian women but to raise
> awareness among Asian American women about the possible consequences of
> their whoring. I think Asian women deserve to be warned about their
> reckless behaviors.
>
> Another problem that I have with your mindless attacks is that you, among
> others, have made me out to be the bad guy for speculating the rise of
> violence against racist AF/WM couples. I do not condone violence; nor
> can I make a moral judgement against anyone who is involved in these
> incidences. As I have mentioned in my post, I think it all parties
> involved in these unfortunate incidences are equally victimized. I can't

> believe that you have the gall to denounce Asian males for administering
> violence on AF/WM couples. This is not a moral issue, so your
> holier-than-thou posturing adds nothing positive to the discussion. I
> think it is important for people to try to understand the rage that
> drives Asian male youths to take actions against what they percieve to be
> racist and indecent. I think that your time is more wisely spent by
> helping me to send a clear message to Asian women that their whoring can
> no longer be tolerated. Let it be known that we Asian males shall not
> further tolerate their cheapening of our race. We shall resist their
> pernicious campaign of autogenocide against the Mongoloid race in
> America, by Machiavellian means if necessary.
>
> As for my stance on Asian superiority, well, we *are* superior in
> intelligence. The facts speak for themselves: Mongoloids exhibit higher
> mean IQ's than other races. While I understand that the worth of a man
> cannot be based on his intelligence alone, I argue that higher
> intelligence is preferable to, say, larger penises.
>
> - SAGE
>
> -------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet

For crap, read SAGE.

The Native Problem

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

On Fri, 09 May 1997 04:21:11 -0600, censo...@hotmail.com wrote:

In article <8631690...@dejanews.com>, censo...@hotmail.com
says...

>Imbuka (or whatever the hell your name is):
>
>First of all, are you a hemmoroid? Well, then G E T O F F M Y A S
>S!!!!!

Very droll.

> I resent your persistent defamation of my character and my views.

Your character and your views are already too low to be defamed.

>You have falsely accused me of advocating violence against women despite
>my repeated appeal to Asian youths to exercise restraint and to explore
>alternative solutions.

You also said you would morally and financially support any Asian
males who got caught administering violence to Asian women who dated
white men. Those words cannot be twisted.

So, maybe I shouldn't say, "Sage supports violence." I should say,
"Sage supports men who commit violence."

>
>Another problem that I have with your mindless attacks is that you, among
>others, have made me out to be the bad guy for speculating the rise of
>violence against racist AF/WM couples.

And proposing to buy it and morally support it.

>I do not condone violence;

No, you don't condone it. You just morally and financially support
it.

> nor
>can I make a moral judgement against anyone who is involved in these
>incidences.

By morally supporting them, you are making a moral judgement.

> As I have mentioned in my post, I think it all parties
>involved in these unfortunate incidences are equally victimized. I can't
>believe that you have the gall to denounce Asian males for administering
>violence on AF/WM couples.

Yes, I do. Unlike you, I have enough of a spine to denounce anyone
who administers violence to anyone. Especially men who get off on
beating up women.

> This is not a moral issue, so your
>holier-than-thou posturing adds nothing positive to the discussion.

I am certainly morally holier than you. But then, so is a bucket of
shit.

I do not morally and financially support any violence felons. I do
not refer to my women as property. Here is the difference between you
an me... I have morals. In place of morality, you have malevolence.

>I think that your time is more wisely spent by
>helping me to send a clear message to Asian women that their whoring can
>no longer be tolerated.

Okay, here goes. Attention Asian women, if you date inter-racially,
your life may be in danger because of certain dangerous, racist,
homicidal maniacs who may pick you out as a target. They may
physically beat you and possibly even kill you because they believe
they own you. Be aware that if these men attack you, Sage will
morally and financially support them.

>Let it be known that we Asian males shall not
>further tolerate their cheapening of our race.

Oh, you have made yourself CRYSTAL clear. <nudge, nudge>

>
>As for my stance on Asian superiority, well, we *are* superior in
>intelligence. The facts speak for themselves: Mongoloids exhibit higher
>mean IQ's than other races. While I understand that the worth of a man
>cannot be based on his intelligence alone, I argue that higher
>intelligence is preferable to, say, larger penises.

Well, at least you are comfortable with having a small penis, then.

If you don't like sane people calling you for the dangerous lunatic
you are, you should restrain your posts to alt.misogyny. Or at least
remove soc.couples.intercultural from your articles. I'm not going to
get off your back as long as I see you in this group. There is no
reason I should let a psychotic Nazi like you spread your filth
unchallenged.

Imbuka
The Native Problem

mckim

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

In article <337278cd...@news.alt.net>, imb...@umuvi.com says...

>
>On Wed, 07 May 1997 02:39:51 -0700, cybe...@hotmail.com (C) wrote:
>
>>(mckim) wrote:
><Praise of mckim snipped>
>
>Mckim also said in the article <5kjt5v$r61$1...@kayrad.ziplink.net> that
>Sage/Mr.Sunshine is "fighting for the EQUALITY and FREEDOM which is
>is more than a civil right, but a human right." Judging by mckim,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Your judgement on me is all based on pure assumption based
on extremely biased ideology. You think I am sage. I am not sage.
I don't have to AGREE 100% with Sage. But I think he is not
the problem. Do I have to agree with 100% with Sage all the time?
No, of course, Are you agreed with your wife 100% all time time?
No. You may be disagree with your wife more than I disagree with
Sage. You see what I am saying; WE DO NOT HAVE TO
AGREE 100% ON EVERY ISSUS.

>you'd think Sage was a real hero. Here are some things that Sage has
>said about freedom and equality. Then we'll see how "eye to eye"
>Africans are to mckim and Sage.
>

HAHAHA......YOU ARE SO FUNNY IMBUKA. What are you saying here?
Are you trying to put C into your Devil Dictionary? Then just great ...
now C has became Mckim and which became the Sage at the end....

trio...@acsu.buffalo.edu

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to [backwords! reverse to reply]

> How about racist ideologues like yourself and C can meet up and pummell
> each other. You'll make things a lot more pleasant for mature, decent
> people who abhor racism and hate, and kill two birds with one stone.
> BTW, trim your headers or go play in alt.test until you know what in the
> fuck you're doing. Any message crossposted to both alt.flame.niggers and
> alt.flame.whites is a TROLL.

ahh a voice of reason... you forgot th put mckims name
with the two other dipshits though....

-nice to hear from you

-tijm


mckim

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

In article <33731cc2...@news.alt.net>, imb...@umuvi.com says...

>
>On 8 May 1997 05:46:44 GMT, mc...@ziplink.com (mckim) wrote:
>
>>In article <3379ea7a...@news.alt.net>, imb...@umuvi.com says...
>
>> called me idiot before, now you called me louse person... You might ran out of adjective
>
>That's not an adjective, you damn idiot! It's a NOUN! GOD DAMN, THIS
>GUY IS SO FUCKING STUPID!
>

So what?

>> somedays... This is not about disagreement.
>
>Yes it is. You and Sage used the word "property" to refer to women.

HAHAHAHAHAHA....according to the Devil Dictionary , I am *the* Sage.
Anyone agrees with me will be Mckim and will be the Sage at the end..
Now sage represents anti-everything in Devil Dictionary..


>I disagree. Sage said his race is genetically superior to mine. I
>disagree. Sage supports violence. I disagree.
>

I don't mind you disagree with Sage.


>> This is not about you do not see
>> the way I see. This is not about you weren't in my shoes. This is not about
>> lack of sympathy. This is not even about emotion. What are these about you?
>
>They are about me criticizing sage, a man who believes in 1) The
>genetic superiority of Asians 2) Violence as a means of ending
>interracial relationships 3) The ownership of women by men.
>

That is his view and his problem. Not mine.. I don't believe
Asian is superior whatever way...I don't believe violence
as any way to solve any problem... Sage believing
the ownership of women...that his view, not mine.. Do I have
a problem with that? of course, but that is not why I am here.
I am here to fight against white racist first mainly, not sage.
I know it is easy to attack sage than white-power Asiaphile..


>He has written about all of these things.
>
>>
>>These are about YOU compliciting the line of white racist/supremacist.
>
>Sage and you are the ones that want racial separation, which is what
>the Shite Supremacists also want.

Yes, I agree with Sage wholeheartly on this issue. We need a racial
separation to solve the problem. But you idiot do not understand
the true underline assumption of when those oppressed people
like Malcolm X really saying about the racial separation...
AHAHA... Now you really wanna be a devil huh... Supremacists...
me the supremacist... Yes, the Devil Dictionary says I am the


supremacist just because I want respect and equality.

You and Sage are the ones kissing
>the asses of Aryan Nations and the KKK. You and they want the same
>thing, division. This IS about me not thinking like you.
>

Of course, the Devil Dictionary can't leave out KKK or Aryan Nation
stuffs.

>>
>> Here are some facts I accused you as the pathetic racist:
>
>None of your facts bear out. All I have done is quoted SAGE and YOU
>and used those words against you. Sage is the one who talked about
>beating women with a baseball bat. Sage is the one who talked about
>running a couple down with his car. Sage is the one who called black
>men swarthy apes. Sage is the one who said Asian men should control
>their female properties. Sage is the one who said Asians are
>genetically superior to all other races. And you call ME the racist
>after Sage said that his people are genetically superior to mine...
>after he called my people swarthy apes. FUCK YOU, you little
>cocksucker. Do you think Malcolm X would give you the time of day
>after you kissed Sage's ass in this thread?
>

Hey, hold on moron..get off from my ass... you are too jumpy ending on
wrong conclusion. I really do not stand his position on
what he said about Latino, and I surely don' t know about him
calling black swarthy apes. He is surely wrong about that. I didn't
read all his threads because I didn't have time to read all his
or all your thread. Does that mean I am complictiing his view on
black people? If you ask me personly about him calling black
people that way, I would say Sage is WRONG. But that
does not mean Sage is Wrong on everything, does it? Of course not!!
I can't track every goddamn thing about Sage. I don't have
time .. I got only one keyboard ...
. Do we have to agree on every Goddamn thing?
We are in Internet, Goddamn it!! We are not in family..

>> issue 1: you called SAGE or ME treating women as a property
>
>Well, Sage and you were the ones who called Asian women your property,
>not me. I don't know if you "treat" women as property. But you do
>refer to them as property.
>

Kiss my ass!!! Liar!!!


>> issue 2: you called Asian male using baseball to beat up female
>
>SAGE is the one who said he wanted to take a baseball bat and beat the
>shit out of every AF/WM couple in sight (his exact words). SAGE is
>the one who brought the baseball bat into this whole thign. You don't
>like it, take it up with sage.
>

I am not going to reprehend his position. I am not going to
attack other asian male when we have a bunch of real foxy
sneaky racist devil running this group. I got to set the
priority straight. And gimme a break., Most of us
here can't do anything about racist asiaphile controlling
this net, and you want me to attack sage. Get out it here!!!
Where did you came from attacking asian males?


>I even gave you the exact quote were SAGE said this, you still you are
>too stupid to understand what I was saying. Pathetic.
>

Sorry I always said this. I am not going to critize him on this..

>>
>> issue 3: you called SAGE compatible person to Ted Bundy
>
>As far as I am concerned, anyone who would fantasize about
>beating a woman with a baseball bat is very similar to Ted
>Bundy and is a very dangerous person. Once again, SAGE said
>it. You cannot deny that he said it because it is there on Deja News
>for you to see.
>

Of course, that is dangerous, but not surely he is Ted Bundy..
Why not calling him another Jeffery Dahmer?


>Sage's fantasies of violence against women make him very similar to
>men like Ted Bundy.
>

I think that is his rage, not fantasy. I now you don't how
angry we are about racist subjugatin..

>> i ssue 5: you labelled me misogynist
>
>Men who call women their property are misogynists. If you are using
>some different mystical definition of property, then I apologize.
>Sage spoke of controlling and beating women. He is a misogynist.
>

No, I disagree. He is not misogynist.



>> issue 6: you said Asians are superior to all others.
>
>Sage has said this on numerous occasions. He has admitted to hating
>hispanics, blacks and whites. If you don't think Asians are superior,
>fine. Sage does.
>

if sage truly believe this, that's his problem. However, there is nothing
he can do about him being superior to black or white. I know white
can do a lots of thing being superior.. In my view, it is whites
who are really perpeturating their superioirty. In my experience,
it is mainl y white racist who acted the most racist supermacis way
in my world.


>Sage wrote, "Our children deserve a safe environment that is conducive
>to the full development of their superior innate abilities."
>

This reminds me of Old Testament ... Jews said they are God-Chosen
people. Can we do something abou Jews saying this? Can you?
Of course not.

>SUPERIOR INNATE ABILITIES. Sage thinks Asians are genetically
>superior to all other races. If you don't think that, fine. Stop
>defending Sage if you don't even know what he has said.
>

Hey, Goddamn it.., Every race said they are superior to other...
Jewish, English, French, German, Japanese, Korean, Chinese and American
all claimed they are superior to other. Now Jews says they are
spiritually superior to all gentiles. Can you do something about that?
of course not. Perhaps you truly can't get it many cultures
of people really saying about their superiorties.


>>
>> Explanations:
>
>Nothing you brought up was relevant to the FACT that both SAGE
>and you have called Asian women property. If you don't consider
>women to be your property, why do you call them property? You words
>are still there in s.c.a.a. Think before you write.
>

No, the Devil Dictionary is all wrong about this.


>>
>> Issue 2:
>> now this is rather very amuzing imbuka talking aboug using baseball bat...
>> This reminds me of Vincent Chin case, the Asian guy severely beaten to
>> dead by a baseball bat by two white males racist.
>
>I think that is a horrible crime, just as it was a horrible crime
>when those Asian youths beat up that interracial couple. SAGE is
>the one that brought that incident up, and suggested he would
>give money to men who did the same thing. I am only going by
>SAGE's words.
>

YOU REALLY ARE TALKING ACCORDING TO THE DEVIL DICTIONARY.

WHERE HELL IN THE WORLD ASIAN YOUTH BEATING UP INTERRACIAL

COUPLE?


>Let me make this perfectly clear. I ABHOR violence against anyone,
>especially for racial reasons. I would think that the Chin case would
>make you all the more eager to CRITICIZE Sage for talking about
>beating women with baseball bats. I would think perhaps that horrible
>crime would have made you learn a lesson. If you want to criticize
>him for it... feel free to do it now.
>

Beating up by baseball bat is not the problem, you moron... It is
the racist white perpetuator got on free. Is it OK for white
to beat up innocent Asian male to death, and the perpetuator never served
in one day in jail basically put $5,000 on bail and walked on free just like?

YOU GODDAMN MORON!!! WHOM DO YOU ACCUSED OF USING
BASEBALL BAT? Sage or the real racist murderer??


>No? Did think so. You, mckim, are not strong enough to stand up to
>Sage.
>

But Sage is the big problme here...What can I about Sage?
He is not the racist. Even he says he is the racist and
owner of Asian women , there is nothing he can do about
it. So what sage can do? Nothing. He is powerless asian..

>>Issue 3:
>> By Imbuka calling SAGE the mass murder as Ted Bunder was is
>> like assulting 6 inches knife on back of the SAGE.
>
>So sage is your martyr now. SAGE is a racist asshole.

No, he is not the racist...


The Native Problem

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

In article <5kvn59$ua5$1...@kayrad.ziplink.net>, mc...@ziplink.com
says...

> on extremely biased ideology. You think I am sage.

No, as I said in my article, you said that Sage was fighting for
freedom and equality. YOUR WORDS. I assumed, wrongly perhaps, that
you were aware of Sage's attitude to blacks (that we are innately
inferior), and yet still you chose to say that he is fighting for
EQUALITY. Sage said he hates black more than he hates white, and then
you turned around and say he is fighting for equality. I was merely
warning C that your idea of equality didn't appear to include him. If
it does, then good for you. You are better than Sage.

> I am not sage.

No shit. If you truly disagree with sage on such things as hispanics,
blacks, etc... GOOD FOR YOU. You are better than Sage.

> I don't have to AGREE 100% with Sage. But I think he is not
> the problem.

He is A problem.

> Do I have to agree with 100% with Sage all the time?
> No, of course, Are you agreed with your wife 100% all time time?

But if she said something racist like Sage did, I would call her down
for it. Hell, I would ask for a fucking divorce. I don't associate
with racist garbage like that pile of shit named Sage.

>WE DO NOT HAVE TO AGREE 100% ON EVERY ISSUS.

No. You don't. And it is perfectly okay for you to criticize sage
when he is wrong.

>
>>you'd think Sage was a real hero. Here are some things that Sage has
>>said about freedom and equality. Then we'll see how "eye to eye"
>>Africans are to mckim and Sage.
>>
>
> HAHAHA......YOU ARE SO FUNNY IMBUKA. What are you saying here?

I was saying C should be careful about aligning himself with someone
who would happily stab him in the back. Now that you have said you
disagree with Sage on his position about innate superiority, etc., I
will admit that I was wrong. Okay. I admit it.

Sage's racial bias against all non-Asians invalidates his position.
He is HARMING the cause you are fighting for.

> Are you trying to put C into your Devil Dictionary?

Whatever.

> Then just great ...
> now C has became Mckim and which became the Sage at the end....

On the contrary, I was trying to tell C that he should be careful
who he trusts. I was not accusing C of being in cahoots with you.
On the contrary, I was warning him of Sage's racism. Sage's says
Asians are genetically intellectually superior to blacks. And YOU
said Sage was fighting for equality. THOSE two things do not go
together. If you were not aware of Sage's opinions on those matters,
fine. I detract my inference that you agreed with him.

I was just trying to warn C about who he trusts.

Imbuka
The Native Problem

The Native Problem

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

On 9 May 1997 08:02:56 GMT, mc...@ziplink.com (mckim) wrote:


>>They are about me criticizing sage, a man who believes in 1) The
>>genetic superiority of Asians 2) Violence as a means of ending
>>interracial relationships 3) The ownership of women by men.
>>
> That is his view and his problem. Not mine.. I don't believe
> Asian is superior whatever way...I don't believe violence
> as any way to solve any problem... Sage believing
> the ownership of women...that his view, not mine.. Do I have
> a problem with that? of course, but that is not why I am here.
> I am here to fight against white racist first mainly, not sage.
> I know it is easy to attack sage than white-power Asiaphile..

Fine. At last. That is all I wanted to hear. I will stop
associating you and Sage from this point forward.

You can feel free to attack the Asiaphile. I am here to fight sage.


> Hey, hold on moron..get off from my ass... you are too jumpy ending on
> wrong conclusion. I really do not stand his position on
> what he said about Latino, and I surely don' t know about him
> calling black swarthy apes. He is surely wrong about that. I didn't
> read all his threads because I didn't have time to read all his
> or all your thread. Does that mean I am complictiing his view on
> black people? If you ask me personly about him calling black
> people that way, I would say Sage is WRONG.

That is all I wanted to hear from the beginning, mckim.

> I am not going to reprehend his position. I am not going to
> attack other asian male when we have a bunch of real foxy
> sneaky racist devil running this group. I got to set the
> priority straight. And gimme a break., Most of us
> here can't do anything about racist asiaphile controlling
> this net, and you want me to attack sage. Get out it here!!!
> Where did you came from attacking asian males?

I will attack all racists, including Sage. Being Asian does not allow
him to get away with being a bigot. Now that you have finally made it
clear you disagree with Sage on this issue, I will concede that this
does not say anything about you.

Asian males are no above reproach. If a black man said to you that
your race was genetically inferior and that you were a swarthy and
ape-like, wouldn't you call him a racist? If he judged your worth
based solely upon your race, wouldn't that make him a racist? That's
what Sage does to all non-Asians, most severely hispanics and blacks.
He is a racist. Period.

>>As far as I am concerned, anyone who would fantasize about
>>beating a woman with a baseball bat is very similar to Ted
>>Bundy and is a very dangerous person. Once again, SAGE said
>>it. You cannot deny that he said it because it is there on Deja News
>>for you to see.
>>
>
> Of course, that is dangerous, but not surely he is Ted Bundy..
> Why not calling him another Jeffery Dahmer?

No, Jeffery Dahmer only killed men. Sage's fantasies are certainly
bizarre, pointing to a pathology in his psyche. He will not truly be
comparable to Ted Bundy unless he starts acting on those fantasies.

>>Sage's fantasies of violence against women make him very similar to
>>men like Ted Bundy.
>>
>
> I think that is his rage, not fantasy. I now you don't how
> angry we are about racist subjugatin..

I have been angry about racist subjugation. But I have more personal
control than Sage. I do not believe in violence. I am certainly not
entertained by fantasies of beating couples with baseball bats. I
will not stoop to level of the racist slime that lynches people of
both our races, not even in fantasy. I believe in rising above them.
Sage is trying to stoop to their level.

>>> i ssue 5: you labelled me misogynist
>>
>>Men who call women their property are misogynists. If you are using
>>some different mystical definition of property, then I apologize.
>>Sage spoke of controlling and beating women. He is a misogynist.
>>
>
> No, I disagree. He is not misogynist.

Then we will have to just disagree on this one. I feel that men who
call women their property are misogynists. End of story.

>>I think that is a horrible crime, just as it was a horrible crime
>>when those Asian youths beat up that interracial couple. SAGE is
>>the one that brought that incident up, and suggested he would
>>give money to men who did the same thing. I am only going by
>>SAGE's words.
>>
>
> YOU REALLY ARE TALKING ACCORDING TO THE DEVIL DICTIONARY.

Not at all. I am talking according to Sage's article "Attention Asian
women: interracial dating may be hazardous to your health."

>
> WHERE HELL IN THE WORLD ASIAN YOUTH BEATING UP INTERRACIAL
>
> COUPLE?

Where have you been, McKim? Sage wrote an entire post about an
incident of Asian youths beating up an interracial couple. He also
said that he would morally and financially support any Asian men who
got caught doing the same thing. If you want more details on the
incident, ask Sage. He brought it up. My point is that both
incidents are equally bad. They are both hate-crimes.

I abhor violence in any form. I abhor the violence against Vincent
Chin, and I abhor the violence against the couple that Sage spoke of.
I don't make allowances for anyone.

> Beating up by baseball bat is not the problem, you moron... It is
> the racist white perpetuator got on free. Is it OK for white
> to beat up innocent Asian male to death, and the perpetuator never served
> in one day in jail basically put $5,000 on bail and walked on free just like?

That is a travesty. American history is filled with stories like
that. But I had no part in it. And that does not make it okay for
Sage to follow in their footsteps.

> YOU GODDAMN MORON!!! WHOM DO YOU ACCUSED OF USING
> BASEBALL BAT? Sage or the real racist murderer??

I have only accused sage of wanting to beat people with a baseball bat
(actually, he openly admitted to this). All real racists murderers
are scum that should be locked up for the rest of their lives. Right
now, Sage only thinks about committing racist murder.

>>No? Did think so. You, mckim, are not strong enough to stand up to
>>Sage.
>>
>
> But Sage is the big problme here...What can I about Sage?
> He is not the racist.

He is a racist. He freely admitted to hating hispanics, blacks and
whites. Anyone who hates all people of other races is a racist.
Period.


> Even he says he is the racist and
> owner of Asian women , there is nothing he can do about
> it. So what sage can do? Nothing. He is powerless asian..

That is irrelevant. His philosophy is still racist. It doesn't
matter that he doesn't have the power to act on it. As he is, he is
just a powerless, impotent racist. Granted, the racists with power
are the most dangerous. And I will stand against them. But it still
does not excuse Sage's racist philosophy.

>>So sage is your martyr now. SAGE is a racist asshole.
>
> No, he is not the racist...
>

Okay. Then he is a non-racist who believes his own race is innately
superior to all others and who hates everyone that is not his race.
What would you call that?

Imbuka
The Native Problem

The Native Problem

unread,
May 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/9/97
to

On 9 May 1997 13:29:20 GMT, rdbe...@ix.netcom.com(Dan Bennett) wrote:

>In <8631690...@dejanews.com> censo...@hotmail.com writes:
>
>>First of all, are you a hemmoroid?
>

>I think that description would more accurately fit YOU, a slimy coward
>who makes up for his complete lack of male genitalia by advocating
>violence against women.

If I may interject, that is entirely unfair to eunuchs. Most eunuchs
are not as bitter as Sage. It is unfair to hold him up as an example
of dicklessness.

>>You have falsely accused me of advocating violence against women
>

>Falsely, hell. Everyone here has seen your trash, as witness below...

He's right. He didn't advocate violence. He chose to support it
morally and financially. There's a BIG DIFFERENCE! He doesn't have
to advocate it. He's getting someone else to do it for him.

>> I can't believe that you have the gall to denounce Asian males for
>>administering violence on AF/WM couples.
>

>> This is not a moral issue
>
>Not to you, since you have no morals. Invertebrates never do.

It is quite amazing isn't it. Talking about a violent hate crime and
saying it is not a moral issue. VIOLENCE IS NOT A MORAL ISSUE? Ha.
That exemplifies his bizarre, irrational thought processes.

Imbuka
The Native Problem

Dan Bennett

unread,
May 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/10/97
to

In <cybersol1-ya023080...@news.csu.net>
cybe...@hotmail.com (C) writes:

>Celebrate African History.

The Hutu or Tutsi version?

C

unread,
May 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/10/97
to

inferior.
Whites through a series of myths have projected themselves as the highest
culture and race on Earth...and sometimes even higher than God herself.

Well why do whites think they are superior?

Because they have murdered and stolen more productive labor than any other
people?

Because they have to lay in the Sun and risk skin cancer to look more of a
human color?

Because they are dying as a race?

Well, whatever the reasons why, we now know the whites are anything but
superior.

THE MYTHS
1) The myth of white democracy. In western "democracy" the politicians are
the competing whores of the ruling capitalist class. Western oligarchy has
changed in rhetoric alone.

2) The myth of white science. The scientific myth was brought to Europe by
non-white Moors from Africa. The Muslim invasion sparked a thought
revolution in europe...even the west's most distinguished philosophers,
like Hegel, are white translations of philosophy from the East. Of course
white used their new found knowledge for unprecedented evil.

3) The myth of white physical superiority. The African has proven himself
the better made human than the white...full stop.

4) The myth of white genetic IQ superiorty. Thank you Asians...The African
won't be far behind in surpassing the white at his own game. We have
already proven that African are capable of full mastery of all the subjects
in the Western Cannon.

5) The myth of white material wealth. It is the stolen land, labor and
creativity of non-white people that has always fueled white wealth. Once
again the Asian has made strides from impoverishment under white rule.

6) The myth of white freedom. Whites have oppressive societies that were
changed by the Negro revolution of the 60's. It was the African American
that has made anything approaching democracy in America.

Have I forgotten anything?

Congratulutions to all non-whites who have survived the most unnatural
condition of white rule! The natural order is being restored...

C

unread,
May 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/10/97
to

inferior.
Whites through a series of myths have projected themselves as the highest
culture and race on Earth...and sometimes even higher than God herself.

Well why do whites thin they are superior?

Because they have murdered and stolen more productive labor than any other
people?

Because the have to lay in the Sun and risk skin cancer to look more of a
human color?

Because they are dying as a race?

Well what ever the reasons why now know the whites are anything but superior.

THE MYTHS
1) The myth of white democracy. In western "democracy" the politicians are

the competing whores of the ruling capitalist class. Western monarchy has
changed in rhetoric alone.

2) The myth of white science. The scientific myth was brought to Europe by
non-white Moors from Africa. The Muslim invasion sparked a thought
revolution in europe...even the west's most distinguished philosophers,
like Hegel, are white translations of philosophy from the East.

3) The myth of white physical superiority. The African has proven himself


the better made human than the white...full stop.

4) The myth of white genetic IQ superiorty. Thank you Asians...The African
won't be far behind in surpassing the white at his own game. We have

already proven that African are capable of full master of all the subjects
in the Western Cannon.

5) The myth of white material wealth. It is the stolen land, labor and
creativity of non-white people that has always fueled white wealth. Once

again the Asian has made stides from impoverishment under white rule.

Fred Koehler

unread,
May 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/10/97
to

I. Choe wrote:
>snip.


I would suggest that you go to any, any country in the world, make only
a limited effort to learn the language, and then start telling its
citizens just how terrible they and their country is.

Then, start supporting racial seggregation. In a multicultural country.

Then, support the enslavement (?) of their women.

Then, support, advocate violence on those who dare associate with people
of other races.

If he wasn't in the States, he'd really more than likely be killed, or
deported. America is one of the few countries which has such a diverse
ethnic, religious, and cultural make-up.
To come to such a country and demand or support the aforementioned is
really quite schizoid. Why would such a person even stay?
Before mckim or you should even open your mouths, I'd suggest the both
of you check the latest census economic demographics regarding
immmigrants. Especially those from the Carribean, Africa, and many Asian
countries. The mojority of them attain economic parity with whites
within 3-5 years. So much for the theory of Racist AmeriKKKa.
Aside from the few trolls from alt.kill.niggers, and alt.kill.honky
(sp), most of the racist rants here have been originating from
non-whites.

Gee. Whadda you know.

BTW, most scholars agree that Berkely is relying on its past
achievements as its claim to fame. Berzerkeley and now Stanford, have
excellent core Tech. departments, but otherwise are waning rapidly.
Of course, receiving hundreds upon hundreds of millions of dollar$ in
Federal grants has allowed them to remain in the Top 10, prestige-wise.
One of the main reasons for Berkeley's decline has indeed been its trend
towards pandering to those with a "Victim/Oppressed" mentality.

BTW, go anywhere and ATTEMPT to insult and denigrate people in their own
language. And poorly, at that.
I think you'll find the response is universal.

Fred Koehler

unread,
May 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/10/97
to

mckim wrote:
>

> FUNK YOU!!


You know, why don't you make a macro for this.

It might save you the embarrassment.

BTW, the proper response to this profanity is:

Yeah? Well your mother wears Army boots.....North Korean?

Dan Bennett

unread,
May 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/10/97
to
>the racist Dan Bennett wrote:

Sorry, Clyde, that charge won't stick.

>> >Celebrate African History.
>>
>> The Hutu or Tutsi version?

>Anything but the white version...they conveniently leave out things
>like Opium Wars and white colonization.

Opium Wars in Africa? Yep, they leave that out sure enough.
Colonisation we know about, though.

But once again, which "African history" are you celebrating? Idi
Amin's Uganda, perhaps? Or do we want to drop back to the times when
west Africans sold their enemies into slavery? Of course, we don't
want to discuss present day slavery in Sudan, do we?

So tell me, what is there in "African history" to celebrate?

johnj

unread,
May 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/10/97
to

In article <cybersol1-ya023080...@news.csu.net>,
cybe...@hotmail.com (C) wrote:

>"James" <je...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>> You two are a hoot. A nigger and a slope trying to understand each
>> other, while neither one has a grasp of the English language.
>

>How well do you speak Hausa, Korean or Chinese? ...dumb crackers think
>english is the only language in the world...

The only real language!!!

>

>>One group can't pronounce the simple word "ASK", while the other group can't
>> enunciate their "R's". I guess you two feel some sort of camaraderie
>> because you pronounce the word "MASTER" in a similar manner. C says "massah
>> James" and McKim says "masstah James".
>

>We will learn perfect English when you have proven the worth of your
>language and culture by not screwing your 6 year-old daughters.

No you won't ya'll be two lazy ta try. SO DON"T EVEN TRY.
>

>Celebrate African Laziness.

johnj

unread,
May 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/10/97
to

In article
<Pine.SOL.3.91.970507...@shiva.hunter.cuny.edu>, David
Chou <dc...@shiva.Hunter.CUNY.EDU> wrote:

>> "James" <je...@bellsouth.net> imagined:

> Keep posting your crap. Historians years later might point to it
> as one among the many sparks which set off a 21st-century race war
> in this country.
>
> Heh-heh-heh....
>
That would be the war you lost, right?>
>
>
> Later,
>
> ----David
>
>
> *

mckim

unread,
May 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/10/97
to

In article <33788574...@news.alt.net>, imb...@umuvi.com says...

>
>
>I will attack all racists, including Sage. Being Asian does not allow
>him to get away with being a bigot. Now that you have finally made it
>clear you disagree with Sage on this issue, I will concede that this
>does not say anything about you.
>

There are some issues I disagree with Sage, but it doesn't
matter and I don't care these disagreement, since it is not
that significant factor to solve the problem.


>Asian males are no above reproach. If a black man said to you that
>your race was genetically inferior and that you were a swarthy and
>ape-like, wouldn't you call him a racist?

Very good qestion, imbuka. If a black man said to me that, I wouldn't
called him a racist. Do you know the reason on that ? Because he is not a racist but
he sure is a hell of prejudiced person. You sound like very liberal-
minded person, but most stupid liberal-minded person do not understand the big
difference between racism and prejudiced. We all are prejudice on
way or another. But we sure are not all racist. To be an racist,
you have be prejudice plus having the power to control and dictate other.
You know what I am saying: Racism = prejudice + power.

>If he judged your worth
>based solely upon your race, wouldn't that make him a racist?

No, you are deadly WRONG. Racism is not solely on
judging other color of skin. Yes, many white americans would
just so LOVE to cherish this kind of idea. This is another trick for
them not to responsible of their legacy of colonization and
oppression.



> That's
>what Sage does to all non-Asians, most severely hispanics and blacks.
>He is a racist. Period.
>

Again, you are deadly WRONG. PERIOD. He is not a racist
but he sure in one hell of very "prejudiced" individual. In order
him to be racist or "fit-in" your world, Sage has to have power
to translate in physial and mental forms his prejudicial attitude to all other
he doesn't like. The question is can Sage do that? No, he can't.
He can't dictate and control white, black or hispanic. He does
not have the power to do so. In reality in American society,
Sage has to a member of white majority to be a racist person.
Sage is a asian meaning powerless. So he isn't.

>>>Sage's fantasies of violence against women make him very similar to
>>>men like Ted Bundy.
>>>
>>
>> I think that is his rage, not fantasy. I now you don't how
>> angry we are about racist subjugatin..
>
>I have been angry about racist subjugation. But I have more personal
>control than Sage.

You have my validity here...If you can control yourself on
the personal, please do so. But do not dictate other to do the same



> I do not believe in violence. I am certainly not
>entertained by fantasies of beating couples with baseball bats.

>will not stoop to level of the racist slime that lynches people of
>both our races, not even in fantasy. I believe in rising above them.

Maybe you could tell white folks stop beating asian people.

>>
>> No, I disagree. He is not misogynist.
>
>Then we will have to just disagree on this one. I feel that men who
>call women their property are misogynists. End of story.
>

I strongly condemn anyone calling Asian-American male
misogynist. It is because we Asian-Americnas in the past
have been the victim of white males sexual superiority.
We are continued to be victimized in the present day...
We have been brutalized by the ugly white sexual abuse.
We Asian males have been condemned by majoirty white
as "Sexless geek" or "dangerous rapist to white women."
These type of absolutely paranoids in white society have been
virtually undetected by the silent white majority as well
asian-americans. These type of power white majority
subscribed are continued to invade in the body and mind
of Asian-Americans in the Cyberspace. Internet has been
another tool where you will see the sicking ritual of
sex-guilt of sexually insecurity of asiaphile going after
women who can't defend themselve...
And Imbuka.... you are condemning the victim as the
misogynist.. see I told you lining with white racism...


>>>I think that is a horrible crime, just as it was a horrible crime
>>>when those Asian youths beat up that interracial couple. SAGE is
>>>the one that brought that incident up, and suggested he would
>>>give money to men who did the same thing. I am only going by
>>>SAGE's words.
>>>
>>
>> YOU REALLY ARE TALKING ACCORDING TO THE DEVIL DICTIONARY.
>
>Not at all. I am talking according to Sage's article "Attention Asian
>women: interracial dating may be hazardous to your health."
>
>>
>> WHERE HELL IN THE WORLD ASIAN YOUTH BEATING UP INTERRACIAL
>>
>> COUPLE?
>
>Where have you been, McKim? Sage wrote an entire post about an
>incident of Asian youths beating up an interracial couple. He also
>said that he would morally and financially support any Asian men who
>got caught doing the same thing. If you want more details on the
>incident, ask Sage. He brought it up. My point is that both
>incidents are equally bad. They are both hate-crimes.
>

Keepin my eye on racial violence both by White or Asian, I hever never
heard of Asian man beating up IRR couple. That article is faked.




>Okay. Then he is a non-racist who believes his own race is innately
>superior to all others and who hates everyone that is not his race.
>What would you call that?
>

It spells as follow: P-R-E-J-U-D-I-C-E.


>Imbuka
>The Native Problem


C

unread,
May 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/10/97
to

the racist Dan Bennett wrote:

> cybe...@hotmail.com (C) writes:
>
> >Celebrate African History.
>
> The Hutu or Tutsi version?


Anything but the white version...they conveniently leave out things like
Opium Wars and white colonization.

--

thunderr

unread,
May 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/11/97
to


Thats silly, johnj couldn't have children when he is into screwing
sheep. He probably can't produce any sperm either. He is such a wuss.

mckim

unread,
May 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/11/97
to

In article <5l2pba$8...@blush.jps.net>, "koehler"@jpsNOSPAM.netRemoveNOSPAM says...
>
>mckim wrote:
>>
>
>
>You kn

I don't know why I talk to you but that thread is SPAM you idiot!!
you think I said FUCK YOU to everyone. NO..I only
said FUCK YOU to idiot like you. So FUCK YOU!!!!


Precast Engineering Company

unread,
May 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/11/97
to

YOU DAMN RACISTS. LEARN HOW TO SPELL SO YOU'LL
BE ABLE TO CALL EACH OTHER HIDEOUS NAMES
CORRECTLY!


johnj <JOH...@PIPELINE.COM> wrote in article
<JOHNJ2-1005...@ip146.philadelphia8.pa.pub-ip.psi.net>...


> In article <cybersol1-ya023080...@news.csu.net>,
> cybe...@hotmail.com (C) wrote:
>
> >"James" <je...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> >> You two are a hoot. A nigger and a slope trying to understand each
> >> other, while neither one has a grasp of the English language.
> >
> >How well do you speak Hausa, Korean or Chinese? ...dumb crackers think
> >english is the only language in the world...
>
> The only real language!!!
>
> >
>
> >>One group can't pronounce the simple word "ASK", while the other group
can't
> >> enunciate their "R's". I guess you two feel some sort of camaraderie
> >> because you pronounce the word "MASTER" in a similar manner. C says
"massah
> >> James" and McKim says "masstah James".
> >
> >We will learn perfect English when you have proven the worth of your
> >language and culture by not screwing your 6 year-old daughters.
>
> No you won't ya'll be two lazy ta try. SO DON"T EVEN TRY.
> >
>

> >Celebrate African Laziness.
>

C

unread,
May 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/11/97
to

The racist Dan Bennett wrote:

> Opium Wars in Africa?

No it happened in China stop acting dumb.

>Yep, they leave that out sure enough.

I know



> Colonisation we know about, though.

It is not taught at the high school level.

> But once again, which "African history" are you celebrating?

There is only one history...a better question would be when?
before the invasion of whites

Idi Amin's Uganda, perhaps?

>That is the legacy of the CIA and MOSSAD.

>Or do we want to drop back to the times when
> west Africans sold their enemies into slavery?

and whites bought them in put them into slavery?
This would be white reductionism.

>Of course, we don't want to discuss present day slavery in Sudan, do we?

It is such an insignificant issue in the full course of African History.

> So tell me, what is there in "African history" to celebrate?

Ghana, Kemet, Axum, Zimbabwe, Timbuktu, Songhai, Islam, Christianity,
Juddaism, Mathematics, Science, Art beauty, and it goes on...

mckim

unread,
May 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/11/97
to

In article <5l2p1n$8...@blush.jps.net>, "koehler"@jpsNOSPAM.netRemoveNOSPAM says...

>
>I. Choe wrote:
>>snip.
>
>
>I would suggest that you go to any, any country in the world, make only
>

NO, FREDDY ... I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST GET OFF

OF MY ASS!!! I DO NOT TO TALK TO SOME WHITE DEVIL

RACIST SCUMBAG PERPETURATIONG AND CONTINUE

TO OPPRSSE RACIAL MINORITY. YOU ARE PAIN

IN MY ASS...SO STOP READING MY POST, SCUM!!!

C

unread,
May 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/11/97
to

JOH...@PIPELINE.COM (johnj) wrote:
> >We will learn perfect English when you have proven the worth of your
> >language and culture by not screwing your 6 year-old daughters.
>
> No you won't ya'll be two lazy ta try. SO DON"T EVEN TRY.

OH COME ON! You just want an excuse to continue screwing your 6 year-old
daughters...

C

unread,
May 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/11/97
to

([backwords! reverse to reply]) wrote:
> How about racist ideologues like yourself and C can meet up and pummell
> each other.

I would love to! It would be like Tyson v. Cooney.

>You'll make things a lot more pleasant for mature, decent
> people who abhor racism and hate, and kill two birds with one stone.

More pleasant for all three of them?

> BTW, trim your headers or go play in alt.test until you know what in the
> fuck you're doing. Any message crossposted to both alt.flame.niggers and

> alt.flame.whites is a TROLL.

You have contributed to a troll then...shut up you clown.

johnj

unread,
May 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/11/97
to

>JOH...@PIPELINE.COM (johnj) wrote:
>> >We will learn perfect English when you have proven the worth of your
>> >language and culture by not screwing your 6 year-old daughters.
>>
>> No you won't ya'll be two lazy ta try. SO DON"T EVEN TRY.
>
>OH COME ON! You just want an excuse to continue screwing your 6 year-old
>daughters...

don't have any daughters but will arrange to have dunderr to screw your
six year old.

trio...@acsu.buffalo.edu

unread,
May 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/11/97
to C

>
> > BTW, trim your headers or go play in alt.test until you know what in the
> > fuck you're doing. Any message crossposted to both alt.flame.niggers and
> > alt.flame.whites is a TROLL.
>
> You have contributed to a troll then...shut up you clown.

C, do you know what a header is? well look at this
one, the poster removed the crosspost....

-tim


Barney Fife

unread,
May 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/11/97
to

>cybe...@hotmail.com (C) wrote:

>>([backwords! reverse to reply]) wrote:
>> How about racist ideologues like yourself and C can meet up and pummell
>> each other.

>I would love to! It would be like Tyson v. Cooney.

. . . or like Michael Jackson vs. Pee Wee Herman.
(now that would be a fight!)

Celebrate Boxing History.
Barney


CHUCKY

unread,
May 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/11/97
to

Hi everyone, I thought you might want to read something real funny.
It's from Mr.Beav Butthead, and Mr C. Both white and black.
This is so funny, you have to read it and laugh.

Subject: Re: Nigger Armpits
From: westsid...@msn.com
Date: 1997/05/09
Message-Id: <8631912...@dejanews.com>
Newsgroups: alt.flame.niggers
[More Headers]

> So this is what is like inside the mind of a white married to a Korean.
>
> In article <8630564...@dejanews.com>, westsid...@msn.com wrote:
> > Did you ever notice when nigger NBA players or other niggers raise their
> > arms there is some disgusting white fungus growing on the kinky armpit
> > hair. UGH!
>
> It's call anti-perspirant and I believe whites use it too...at least in
> America. Europeans have a long standing habit of not bathing...The African
> Moors had show you that evil spirits would not get you if you
> bathed...before this Europeans pressed perfumed napkins against their nose
> to keep from smelling each other.
>
> > I guess this is a good time to mention some of the other
> > repulsive chacteristics of the nigger race. Well, they smell like a
> > combination of shit and horses.
>
> Interesting, I've always thought crackers smelled like a combination of
> rotten bolgna and wet dog hair.
>
> >This is because they have the most apocrine (or smell glands) on their
> chests, >genitals and armpits.
>
> And what is the white excuse?
>
> >That's why they invented the words "stanky" and "funky" Thats why nigger women
> > wear lavender smelling deodorent, the same smell used to deodorize a
> > toilet.
>
> And why do white women use body spray?
>
> >And of course they have huge everted bubble lips showing the
> > disgusting pink mucous membrane behind the lips.
>
> Last time I check Asians had some pretty full lips themselves. Do you ever
> look and at your wife's brown gentials and full lips and see "nigger." I
> think it is beautiful how the Asian phenotype melds into the African
> phenotype in South Asia and the Polynesian Islands. How far are your
> children away from niggers?
>
> One more point about lips...humans are the only life primate with
> them...guess what whites don't have them.
>
> >And gums covered with black spots. A huge wide nose like an apes and of
> course >that kinky disgusting Brillo pad hair.
>
> What is more ape like is the straight monkey fur that covers the ave.
> white. They have hair growing on their backs stomaches and everywhere
> imaginable...know humans have this much hair.
>
> >Imagine having oral sex with a negress.
>
> Your korean women would be considered a negress by some. No matter how much
> you hate Africans it won't change this.
>
> >You got the shit-horse smell combined with the usual fish smell and all
> > combined with that kinky pubic hair which undoubedly has accumalated
> > other filth. No wonder nigger men don't eat out nigger women.
>
> We don't do it because it is dog-like and unnatural its the same reason we
> don't screw our 6-year old children like the whites...but I doubt you
> understand this because you are probably already in you childrens pants.
>
> >In high school the blacks had a saying, "White boys are a funny bunch, what we
> > call pussy they call lunch." Blacks also have that primitive jutting
> > forward lower face similier to an apes. This is called "pronagathism"
>
> Once again these are called lips. And look at your Korean wifes face. For a
> primative Jaw line you can look at your ave. white.
>
> > and indicates a less evolved state in primates. (to be explained more
> > fully in another post) Even niggers don't like these characteristics.
> > They like light colored "high-yellow" women, not dark nappy haired black
> > bitches.
>
> This is old...
>
> > They like "good - hair" ie straight hair, all the negresses
> > straighten it.
>
> Just like Korean white wannabes burn thier hair to a crisp and dye it...the
> funny thing about this is with the afro all they need is a complete tan.
>
> >But its still like steel wool, just straight steel wool.
> > Compare this to a blond girls lovely silky golden hair. I saw my first
> > nigger when I was seven years old. My Dad was trying to wake it up on the
> > couch, where it had fallen asleep after drinking rubbing alcohol. I
> > asked Dad if it was human like us. He said, "yes, but less evolved" Dad
> > was an extreme liberal. I was most disgusted by the hands and the pink
> > fingernails, and the white palms.
>
> I don't like white skin anywhere but it not as pale as the pales of the whites.
>
> >Well enough for now or I will throw up. Billy PS I forgot the splotchy
> spots on >their faces that look like dirt. Koreans call them Camdunghe,
> that is "shit >colored people". Billy
>
> You know what we call uneducated Koreans who date your type...common bar
> whores. We call the educated one mail order brides.
> Attaboy C , You realize that the best way to insult someone (my wife) is to

accuse them of being part nigger. BTW Koreans are the most evolved
humans on earth. They have evolved to have no apocrine (sex smell)
glands. Whites have lost some of these glands through evolution.
Niggers have loads of them, even on the chest. And Koreans have the
least pronagthism (the least jutting forward lower face) and so they are
the most evolved in this respect also. Niggers are the least evolved,
they have the ape like jutting mouth. Billy

M. Taylor

unread,
May 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/12/97
to

C wrote:

> Ghana, Kemet, Axum, Zimbabwe, Timbuktu, Songhai, Islam, Christianity,
> Juddaism, Mathematics, Science, Art beauty, and it goes on...

It might well go on.... but not by a dimwit like C.

C knows nothing of these topics himself and will embarrass himself further by trying to expand
African....science and math.

Dan Bennett

unread,
May 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/12/97
to

>THE MYTHS
>1) The myth of white democracy. In western "democracy" the politicians
>are the competing whores of the ruling capitalist class. Western

>oligarchy has changed in rhetoric alone.

And what system would you prefer? The African standard seems to bwe
that the party with the most gunmen wins. Although that has a certain
quaint charm, I prefer something a little less colourful.

>2) The myth of white science. The scientific myth was brought to
>Europe by non-white Moors from Africa.

Then let 'em have their myth back, and forthwith! We can make myths of
our own, thank you.

> The Muslim invasion sparked a thought revolution in europe...even the
>west's most distinguished philosophers,
>like Hegel, are white translations of philosophy from the East.

Do tell? Who was Hegel plagiarising? (I never liked him much anyway,
I'm a Kierkegaard fan, myself.)

> Of course
>white used their new found knowledge for unprecedented evil.

Of course. Even now we're using the evil white English language on
evil white-invented computers to talk across the evil white designed
internet and exchange inanities internationally. Drat them whites
anyway! <laugh>

>3) The myth of white physical superiority. The African has proven
>himself the better made human than the white...full stop.

Yep, white men can't jump. They can't put many can lids in their lips,
either. They're stuck with doing mundane things like writing
Constitutions.

>4) The myth of white genetic IQ superiorty. Thank you Asians...The
>African won't be far behind in surpassing the white at his own game.

Even now, it's readily apparent that Africa as a whole has surpassed
any white-ruled part of the world in simple quality of life. After
all, why would anyone want to live in San Francisco when they could
live in Mombasa? How you gonna keep 'em down on the farm after they're
seen Khartoum? All roads lead to Lagos... Yep, Africa is leading us
into a brave new world, all because of African intellectual
superiourity.

> We have
>already proven that African are capable of full mastery of all the


>subjects in the Western Cannon.

As witness the enlightened political processes in places like Rwanda or
the Central African Repulic.

>5) The myth of white material wealth. It is the stolen land, labor and
>creativity of non-white people that has always fueled white wealth.

Creativity, yessirree, if it weren't for non-white folks, we wouldn't
have diddly. Just think where we'd be without the inventions of Thomas
Alva Umbweebwee or Alexander Graham Mfume, or the medical breakthroughs
of Louis Pastuer Natango or Jonas Salk Calunda. And of course, the
world would be a much poorer place without the music of Johann
Sebastian Uhuru or the literature of William Shakespeare Mustafa.
Nope, white folks just never have had any creativity.

> Once
>again the Asian has made strides from impoverishment under white rule.

Just look whatthe great Juche Idea of Dear Leader Kim Jong-Il has done
for Korea.

>6) The myth of white freedom. Whites have oppressive societies that
>were changed by the Negro revolution of the 60's. It was the African
>American that has made anything approaching democracy in America.

Wonder how it was that the mean nasty evil rotten white folks let that
happen? Musta caught 'em asleep and run that in on 'em, eh?

>Have I forgotten anything?

I doubt it. You'd have had to have known something for that to happen.

>Congratulutions to all non-whites who have survived the most unnatural
>condition of white rule! The natural order is being restored...

My condolences to anyone whose identity is so pathetically insecure
that they have to invent a history for themselves before they feel any
sense of worth.

BTW, when are you gonna tell us about the winged Egyptians who built
the pryamids?

mckim

unread,
May 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/12/97
to

In article <5l55ik$r...@drn.zippo.com>, CHUCKY says...

>
>Hi everyone, I thought you might want to read something real funny.
>It's from Mr.Beav Butthead, and Mr C. Both white and black.
>This is so funny, you have to read it and laugh.
>
>

No, I think you are really funny here you Byong-Shin-Sae-Ki!!

>. BTW Koreans are the most evolved
>humans on earth.

ahaha.....koreans are the most evolved!!!...Gimme me a
break ByongShin CHUCKY... I am a korean, the
korean like you are the most ByongShin (idiot) in the world..
There is nothing to be proud being idiot like you...



Robert Maxwell Harris

unread,
May 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/12/97
to

On 8 May 1997, mckim wrote:

> He even supplied the hard truth. The truth that is
> rather so painful to admit because we have been
> brainwashed by the promise of Americna propaganda
> like Freedom and Democratcy and other lip serivce
> nonsense. And we love to believe these lie and propaganda.
> Again the real truth I would to see the first is we need
> the SEPARATION.
>


Okay. You want separation, go to your nearest travel agent and buy a
ticket on Korean Airlines or whatever is your favorite carrier and fly to
Korea, China or whereever you feel at home. I think that will accomplish
your desire for separation.


take...@delphi.com

unread,
May 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/12/97
to

should your name be Dan Bigot?

Roger Shouse

unread,
May 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/12/97
to

In article <cybersol1-ya023080...@news.csu.net> cybe...@hotmail.com (C) writes:
>From: cybe...@hotmail.com (C)
>Subject: Re: Asian Manhood V. white monkeyhood
>Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 04:41:34 -0700

>The racist Dan Bennett wrote:

>> Opium Wars in Africa?

>No it happened in China stop acting dumb.

>>Yep, they leave that out sure enough.

>I know
>
>> Colonisation we know about, though.

>It is not taught at the high school level.

Not true in most school districts. As a jr. high student in the mid-60's, I
was taught about colonialism in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. As a teacher
15 years later, I taught similar units to my 8th and 9th graders. This was a
predominantly white, suburban, middle class school district.

Roger Shouse

James Funkmeyer

unread,
May 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM5/12/97
to
How sad that you would lower yourself to the level of that guy.

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages