Tom Shelly..
Reuven Singer
news:a63a86443dc652c4...@arancio.net:
>
> LMBAO!! You crakers beleive this 6-million bullshit.
>
> You dumbass crackers buy into to this shit........Here go proof.
> Now go kiss a Jew ass! Tom Shelly been kissing Jew ass for years.
> Emma
>
> Imagine that a robber walks into a bank, points a pistol at a teller,
> hands her a bag, and demands that she put all the money from her cash
> drawer in it. At first she protests, but then, after he threatens to
> shoot, she fills the robber's bag with cash. And then imagine that, as
> the robber walks out of the bank with his bag of loot, the bank guard
> opens the door for him, smiles at him, offers to hail a cab for him,
> and tells him to come again soon. After that it's not difficult to
> imagine that he probably will. That's about the way it's been with the
> Jews recently. Two years ago they put a gun to the head of the Swiss
> people collectively and demanded billions of dollars in reparations
> for Swiss bank accounts they claimed had been owned by Jews who
> disappeared during the Second World War. The Swiss initially protested
> that unclaimed Jewish bank accounts from the 1930s and 1940s amounted
> at most to a few million dollars, not to billions, and besides the war
> ended more than 50 years ago and claims should have been filed long
> ago. The Jews threatened to shoot, figuratively speaking, by having
> their bought politicians in the United States prevent Swiss banks from
> doing business in America. Eventually they walked away with $1.25
> billion in loot, with the Swiss apologizing for not having coughed it
> up sooner.
>
> After that sort of success with the Swiss one could hardly expect the
> Jews to give up extortion and go straight. So anyway, they were back
> again soon, with demands against the Volkswagen Company for having
> used Jewish workers during the Second World War and providing them
> only with room and board but not paying them union-scale wages. One
> might think that these Jewish workers would be grateful to Volkswagen
> for keeping them alive during the war, feeding them, and giving them a
> roof over their heads, when so many German civilians had only
> bombed-out ruins to live in. Well, if you thought that, you just don't
> understand Jews. The Jews told the Volkswagen Company that if it ever
> wanted to sell any more cars in America, it had better cough up --
> soon. And the bought politicians and the media bosses in America began
> rattling their sabers and talking loudly about sanctions of various
> sorts against Volkswagen. And so, like the Swiss banks, Volkswagen
> coughed up the money.
>
> Then the feeding frenzy started, just as I told you it would two years
> ago, when I predicted that after the Jews had cleaned out the Swiss
> they would go after other victims in a long list. Volkswagen wasn't
> the only company which had used involuntary labor during the war. The
> Jews went after Daimler-Benz and BMW and Siemens.
>
> And Switzerland wasn't the only country where Jews could claim that
> Uncle Abe had stashed some of his loot sixty years ago, before the
> war. So they sued banks in France and in Britain and began moaning and
> whining in the media that the banks were being "insensitive" to poor,
> deserving "Holocaust survivors," who suddenly had remembered Uncle
> Abe's millions and needed it - - now. And then they remembered the
> insurance companies in Italy and Switzerland and Britain and elsewhere
> from whom they could claim that Uncle Abe once had had a
> life-insurance policy. Then they remembered that the Swedes owed them
> gold, and the Danes and the Norwegians. Even the Poles, whom the Jews
> had ruled as Bolshevik commissars for nearly 50 years after the war,
> owed them, they claimed.
>
> The racket has worked the same in every case: pay us, or we will have
> our bought Gentile politicians pass laws making it impossible for you
> to continue doing business, and our people in the media will paint you
> as monsters who want to hang onto the profit you made when poor Uncle
> Abe and Aunt Sara were crammed into gas chambers, and then the
> gullible Gentile lemmings won't buy your products. If you give us any
> trouble or resist our demands we'll make an example of you, the way we
> did with the Swiss banks. Just pay us the few hundred million dollars
> we're demanding now, and we'll leave you alone. Otherwise, it'll end
> up costing you a lot more.
>
> And it has worked every time. Not one banker or businessman has stood
> up to them and flatly refused to pay. Not one president or prime
> minister has said to them, "All right, Jew boys! You try a boycott
> against my country, and we'll organize a boycott against Israel. We'll
> round up all the Jews in our country and send them packing." Not one
> has called the Jews' bluff. They've all calculated that it is cheaper
> to pay the gangsters than to fight them, and so they pay. Honor means
> nothing to these businessmen and politicians. Principles mean nothing
> to them. All they care about is continuing to make money, continuing
> to stay in office.
>
> With this sort of attitude predominant among the Gentiles, one can
> hardly blame the Jews for turning to extortion on a larger scale than
> ever before. They are successful at it; therefore they continue to do
> it. And they don't limit themselves to Europe or to those who
> allegedly cooperated with the Germans in their demand for reparations.
> A few months ago they filed a claim against Britain for $600 million
> they claim the British government confiscated from Jews between 1940
> and 1942 when the British governed Palestine. Remember, the Jews were
> waging a guerrilla war against the British prior to 1948, when the
> British finally gave up and pulled out, letting the Jews slaughter the
> Palestinians and establish the Jewish state of Israel on Palestinian
> land. The Jews were kidnapping and murdering British soldiers in
> Palestine and assassinating diplomats. In 1946 the Jews used a
> terrorist bomb to blow up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, which was
> the British government headquarters. This Jewish forerunner of the
> Oklahoma City bombing killed a large number of British civilians and
> military people. And now the Jews are demanding $600 million in
> reparations from the British!
>
> And of course, the Jews also are expecting payoffs from American
> companies. Both Ford and General Motors had subsidiaries working in
> Germany when the Second World War began. The Ford plant in Germany
> made military vehicles for the Germans throughout the war, and the
> General Motors subsidiary, Opel, did the same. And so now the Jews are
> claiming that both Ford and General Motors owe them a great deal of
> money because of that. The Jews already have filed a class-action suit
> against Ford in a Federal court in New Jersey, seeking hundreds of
> millions of dollars in wages plus interest for Jews who worked in
> Ford's German plant during the war. And because the businessmen who
> run Ford and General Motors today are the same sort as those who run
> the Volkswagen Company, they undoubtedly will pay off the Jews rather
> than risk having the media portray them as "insensitive" types who
> profited from the so-called "Holocaust" and now refuse to share their
> loot with the poor, deserving Jewish "survivors." Two hundred years
> ago the American motto was, "Millions for defense, but not one cent
> for tribute." But in those days Americans were made of sterner stuff
> -- and I assume that our people in Europe were too.
>
> Cash isn't the only thing the Jews are going after. They have decided
> that a substantial portion of the art treasures of Europe really
> belonged to Uncle Abe too 60 years ago and ought to be returned to the
> Jews now. It is true, of course, that during the war the German
> government had a keen interest in bringing as much Germanic art as
> possible back under German protection. They bought all the Vermeers
> and Rembrandts and Holbeins and Dürers and Halses and other Germanic
> art works as they could from owners in the conquered countries and
> brought them back to Germany. And when the works the Germans were
> interested in were in the hands of Jews, they often brought pressure
> to bear and obtained the works at low prices. The Germans, however,
> generally weren't interested in modern art -- certainly not in Jewish
> paintings by Chagall or Modigliani, for example -- and a great many
> such modern paintings ended up in the hands of Jewish art dealers. In
> fact, the Germans often had agreements with Jewish art dealers,
> swapping the modern paintings they weren't interested in for the
> Germanic paintings they were interested in. The biggest of these
> Jewish dealers, Georges Wildenstein, was in Paris, and he acquired an
> enormous number of modern paintings during the war. After the war he
> brought them to New York and later sold hundreds of them to museums
> and private collectors around the world. The Jews currently are
> engaged in a huge treasure hunt for those paintings now in Gentile
> hands which formerly belonged to Jews. The facts that most of these
> paintings were acquired by their present owners from Jewish dealers
> such as the Wildensteins and that many of them were legally purchased
> from their Jewish owners during the war are glossed over. All of these
> paintings are characterized by the Jews as "art stolen from victims of
> the Holocaust by the Nazis," and they want it all back now.
>
> There's an interesting double standard here. A messy divorce in the
> Wildenstein family attracted public attention last year to the Jewish
> family's business dealings in Paris during the war, and another Jewish
> family claimed that the Wildensteins have artworks that actually
> should be returned to them, because they were forced to sell them at
> fire-sale prices during the war. The Wildensteins told them to buzz
> off: the statute of limitations for such claims expired long ago, the
> Wildensteins asserted. Of course, no Gentile owner dares make such an
> assertion. But in fact, there are statutes of limitations for most
> claims. Dormant bank accounts typically become the property of the
> government after being unclaimed for 20 years or so, but when the
> Swiss brought up that legality two years ago, the Jews went into their
> "persecuted victim" act, feigning outrage that the Swiss should try to
> let a mere law stand between the Jews and what they were claiming in
> reparations.
>
> Whenever the Jews, in order to remind the world for the six-millionth
> time of their "victim" status, have accused some elderly German or
> Pole or Ukrainian or Lithuanian of having mistreated Jews 55 years ago
> during the war, there is no question of a statute of limitations. If
> anyone mentions that legality, Jewish shrieking in all of their media
> quickly drowns him out. For an injury, real or imaginary, done to a
> Jew by a Gentile there is no statute of limitations, no matter how
> much time has passed. The Jews still celebrate every year in their
> Purim festival the revenge their ancestors took on the ancient
> Persians 2,500 years ago through their control of a corrupt king.
>
> Yet when the Polish government asked the government of Israel a few
> months ago to extradite a Jewish mass murderer, Solomon Morel, so that
> he could be tried in Poland for genocide, the Jews refused. "There's a
> statute of limitations for extradition," the Israelis told the Poles,
> "and you're too late." Morel was the Jew-communist commissar of a
> concentration camp in Poland after the war, and he had tortured
> hundreds of Poles and Germans to death. When he saw the possibility
> of retribution looming, Morel, like thousands of other Jewish
> criminals before him, fled to Israel. The horrifying atrocities
> committed by Solomon Morel have been described in the 1993 book An Eye
> for an Eye by John Sack.
>
> This same double standard applies to every sort of interaction between
> Jews and non-Jews. It is a fact that in wars people suffer losses.
> Usually, within a few years after the wars are over, people try to get
> on with their lives, and they consider what is past to be past. If
> other people behaved the way the Jews behave, then every Englishman
> whose family residence got hit by a bomb during the "blitz" of the
> Second World War would be clamoring now for the German government to
> reimburse him for the repairs that his grandparents had to make 55
> years ago -- plus interest, of course. And if it's all right to go
> back 55 years for claims, why not go back 135 years and let all of the
> Americans whose ancestors' homes and farms in Georgia were burned by
> General Sherman collect damages from the U.S. government now -- plus
> interest, of course? Or why not go back 220 years and demand that Tony
> Blair's government pay reparations to all of those Americans whose
> ancestors suffered property loss from the Redcoats during the First
> American Revolution -- plus interest, of course? I mean, if the Jews
> are allowed to keep score, without regard for time, why shouldn't
> everyone else? Why not set up some sort of World Court for
> Reparations? I imagine that there are a lot of Palestinians who would
> like to file claims against the state of Israel.
>
> The fact is that we would have international chaos if everybody
> behaved the way the Jews do. So this raises two interesting questions:
> Why do the Jews behave the way they do? And why do we let them get
> away with it?
>
> Well, I've already given an answer of a sort to the first question:
> the Jews behave the way they do because we let them behave that way;
> it's just like the case of the bank robber, who will keep coming back
> until the bank guard stops being nice and shoots the robber. But
> there's really more to it than that. No one else is even inclined to
> make the sort of demands on the rest of the world that the Jews do.
> The Jews really are different. Their religion provides a few clues in
> this regard. It is a religion which tells them that all the property
> of the Gentiles really should belong to Jews, that the Jews are
> entitled to it. It's as blatant as anywhere in the 60th chapter of the
> book attributed to their prophet Isaiah, where they are told to keep
> their gates open all the time, so that all the wealth of the Gentiles
> can be brought to them. "Thou shalt suck the milk of the Gentiles,"
> the Jews are told. And if you think that doesn't really mean what it
> sounds like it means, you should look into the Talmud, where the
> Jewish sages, the Jewish interpreters of the Bible, explain to the
> rest of the Jews what it means. The Talmud tells the Jews that only
> Jews are human beings, that the Gentiles are just animals created by
> the Jewish tribal god Yahweh to be used by the Jews, like other
> animals are used. Because Gentiles are merely animals, they can't
> really own anything, and it is the duty of the Jews to make sure they
> don't.
>
> Now all of this Biblical stuff and Talmudic stuff is very old and
> quaint and might seem irrelevant to a lawsuit against the Ford Motor
> Company by the Jews today. But this old and quaint stuff is the basis
> of the Jews' religion today. The religious Jews really believe it. And
> the non-religious Jews, the atheist Jews, behave as if they believe
> it. And I think that in a certain sense they do. I think this belief
> is in their blood. I think that this is what accounts for their almost
> incredible arrogance in their dealings with non-Jews.
>
> And of course, there's not just belief: there's also calculation. They
> understand that the success of their current effort to swindle the
> rest of the world out of every cent they can depends on three factors:
> it depends on their control of the mass media; it depends on the
> unprecedented degree of political corruption which exists almost
> everywhere in the Western world, on the unprecedented degree of
> democracy; and it depends on the confused and demoralized state of
> Gentiles everywhere.
>
>
>
It is hardly extortion to demand that which was previously stolen from one.
But neo-Nazis are so used to theft and murder that the thought of paying
back their victims never occurs to them.
Emma Morgan Bonner
I know him and he never said anything about the Jews at all.
I think you have a problem
Emma