Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Has Netanyahu yet said "bomb them anyway!"
4 views
Skip to first unread message
HHW
Jun 19, 2013, 10:18:55 PM6/19/13
to
Russia: Iran is ready to Cease Enriching Uranium to 20%
Posted on 06/19/2013 by Juan Cole
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov repeated in an interview with
the Kuwaiti press on Tuesday an assertion he has made before, i.e.
that Iran stands ready to cease enriching uranium to 19.75% for the
purpose of fueling its medical reactor. This level of enrichment was
forced on Iran when it ran out of enriched uranium for its small
reactor that produces medical isotopes for treating cancer. Iran had
bought a stock of fuel from Argentina before the latter mothballed its
nuclear program. Most of Iran’s enrichment is to only 3.5% for making
fuel for nuclear reactors so as to produce electricity, but it does
have some of the 19.75% enrichment level (the last level considered
“Low Enriched Uranium” (LEU). Israel and the US are worried that this
stock could be most easily further enriched to the 90% or so necessary
to produce a nuclear bomb.
The USG Open Source Center translates Larvov’s remarks from the
Russian:
Russian minister says Iran ready to stop enriching uranium to 20 per
cent
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Document Type: OSC Summary
Russian minister says Iran ready to stop enriching uranium to 20 per
cent
Russia’s foreign minister has said that Iran is prepared to suspend
efforts to enrich uranium to 20 per cent.
In an interview with the Kuwaiti government’s official Kuna news
agency, published in Russian on the Russian Foreign Ministry website
on 18 June, Sergey Lavrov said the move could be a “breakthrough” in
the stalemate surrounding Iran’s nuclear programme.
“In the efforts to resolve the situation surrounding the Iranian
nuclear programme, for the first time in many years, there are some
encouraging signs. Without doubt, an important role in this has been
played by the principles of phasing (Russian: poetapnost) and
mutuality proposed by the Group of Six, which offers Iran the prospect
of sanctions being eased and, ultimately, lifted, in exchange for
conscientious and consistently deepening cooperation with the
international community,” Lavrov said.
“Without going into detail, the Iranians confirm the main point –
their readiness, right now, to agree to suspend the enrichment of
uranium to 20 per cent. This really could be a breakthrough agreement,
and could significantly reduce the severity of the existing problems,
including concerns over the likelihood of a future escalation of
enrichment to weapons-grade. Naturally, this assumes substantial
reciprocal measures on the part of the Group of Six. The international
community should respond appropriately and with mutuality to
constructive movement on the Iranian side, including with the gradual
suspension and lifting of sanctions, both unilateral sanctions and
those introduced through the UN Security Council. It would be
unforgivable not to make use of this opportunity,” he added.
“It is extremely important that, in circumstances where the
possibility of progress at the talks has been identified, all sides
should refrain from ill-conceived moves that might undermine these
efforts. The continued ramping-up of sanctions pressure on Tehran must
be avoided, and thought needs to be given to identifying ways of
possibly gradually reducing that pressure, in areas that Iran will
notice.
“We believe that, in order to ensure that both Iran and the Group of
Six can move forward, political will and a reserve of flexibility are
required. That is what we believe will deliver success in the
negotiations process, irrespective of where and in which country the
latest elections are taking place.
“We believe that, in the current situation, a reduction in the
accumulated momentum of the negotiations process is unacceptable. The
date and venue for the next meeting between Iran and the Group of Six
need to be agreed as soon as possible.
“At the same time, we proceed on the basis that Iran has an
unconditional right to develop a civilian nuclear programme, including
its right to enrichment, once all the outstanding issues have been
clarified and Iran’s entire nuclear activity has been placed under the
reliable and comprehensive monitoring of the IAEA (International
Atomic Energy Agency).
“As for the results of the presidential election in Iran, we proceed
on the basis that Iran’s new president will adhere to the existing
rules in respect of the supreme leadership of the IRI (Islamic
Republic of Iran), and will continue to follow its line on foreign
policy and on sensitive domestic problems,” Lavrov said.
(Description of Source: Moscow Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
Russian Federation in Russian — Official website of the Russian
Ministry of Foreign Affairs; URL: http://www.mid.ru)
Posted on 06/19/2013 by Juan Cole
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov repeated in an interview with
the Kuwaiti press on Tuesday an assertion he has made before, i.e.
that Iran stands ready to cease enriching uranium to 19.75% for the
purpose of fueling its medical reactor. This level of enrichment was
forced on Iran when it ran out of enriched uranium for its small
reactor that produces medical isotopes for treating cancer. Iran had
bought a stock of fuel from Argentina before the latter mothballed its
nuclear program. Most of Iran’s enrichment is to only 3.5% for making
fuel for nuclear reactors so as to produce electricity, but it does
have some of the 19.75% enrichment level (the last level considered
“Low Enriched Uranium” (LEU). Israel and the US are worried that this
stock could be most easily further enriched to the 90% or so necessary
to produce a nuclear bomb.
The USG Open Source Center translates Larvov’s remarks from the
Russian:
Russian minister says Iran ready to stop enriching uranium to 20 per
cent
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Document Type: OSC Summary
Russian minister says Iran ready to stop enriching uranium to 20 per
cent
Russia’s foreign minister has said that Iran is prepared to suspend
efforts to enrich uranium to 20 per cent.
In an interview with the Kuwaiti government’s official Kuna news
agency, published in Russian on the Russian Foreign Ministry website
on 18 June, Sergey Lavrov said the move could be a “breakthrough” in
the stalemate surrounding Iran’s nuclear programme.
“In the efforts to resolve the situation surrounding the Iranian
nuclear programme, for the first time in many years, there are some
encouraging signs. Without doubt, an important role in this has been
played by the principles of phasing (Russian: poetapnost) and
mutuality proposed by the Group of Six, which offers Iran the prospect
of sanctions being eased and, ultimately, lifted, in exchange for
conscientious and consistently deepening cooperation with the
international community,” Lavrov said.
“Without going into detail, the Iranians confirm the main point –
their readiness, right now, to agree to suspend the enrichment of
uranium to 20 per cent. This really could be a breakthrough agreement,
and could significantly reduce the severity of the existing problems,
including concerns over the likelihood of a future escalation of
enrichment to weapons-grade. Naturally, this assumes substantial
reciprocal measures on the part of the Group of Six. The international
community should respond appropriately and with mutuality to
constructive movement on the Iranian side, including with the gradual
suspension and lifting of sanctions, both unilateral sanctions and
those introduced through the UN Security Council. It would be
unforgivable not to make use of this opportunity,” he added.
“It is extremely important that, in circumstances where the
possibility of progress at the talks has been identified, all sides
should refrain from ill-conceived moves that might undermine these
efforts. The continued ramping-up of sanctions pressure on Tehran must
be avoided, and thought needs to be given to identifying ways of
possibly gradually reducing that pressure, in areas that Iran will
notice.
“We believe that, in order to ensure that both Iran and the Group of
Six can move forward, political will and a reserve of flexibility are
required. That is what we believe will deliver success in the
negotiations process, irrespective of where and in which country the
latest elections are taking place.
“We believe that, in the current situation, a reduction in the
accumulated momentum of the negotiations process is unacceptable. The
date and venue for the next meeting between Iran and the Group of Six
need to be agreed as soon as possible.
“At the same time, we proceed on the basis that Iran has an
unconditional right to develop a civilian nuclear programme, including
its right to enrichment, once all the outstanding issues have been
clarified and Iran’s entire nuclear activity has been placed under the
reliable and comprehensive monitoring of the IAEA (International
Atomic Energy Agency).
“As for the results of the presidential election in Iran, we proceed
on the basis that Iran’s new president will adhere to the existing
rules in respect of the supreme leadership of the IRI (Islamic
Republic of Iran), and will continue to follow its line on foreign
policy and on sensitive domestic problems,” Lavrov said.
(Description of Source: Moscow Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
Russian Federation in Russian — Official website of the Russian
Ministry of Foreign Affairs; URL: http://www.mid.ru)
NefeshBarYochai
Jun 20, 2013, 12:59:17 AM6/20/13
to
HHW it is good to have you back. I caught the raccoon yesterday with
the trap you found for me. You took the time to help me and anti-
Semite or not I owe you one. I took it to the mountains. When I
opened the trap it didn't immediately jump out. So I kind of dumped
it out and watched scurry down the hill slower than the other two I
trapped in the past. It got a little ways down the hill and then it
stopped and looked back as if to say:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1ypn0y32Ac
the trap you found for me. You took the time to help me and anti-
Semite or not I owe you one. I took it to the mountains. When I
opened the trap it didn't immediately jump out. So I kind of dumped
it out and watched scurry down the hill slower than the other two I
trapped in the past. It got a little ways down the hill and then it
stopped and looked back as if to say:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1ypn0y32Ac
HHW
Jun 20, 2013, 1:16:01 AM6/20/13
to
HHW
Jun 20, 2013, 1:16:53 AM6/20/13
to
On Jun 19, 11:59 pm, NefeshBarYochai <tachanu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Truth and honesty
Jun 20, 2013, 9:08:03 AM6/20/13
to
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:18:55 -0700 (PDT), HHW wrote:
> ļæ½At the same time, we proceed on the basis that Iran has an
Russian know that too.
Once the Iranians convert their low-enriched uranium to a gaseous compound
they will get UF6, and then they will use their centrifuges to separate the
U235. They should be able to do that as the hard bit is getting the
low-enriched uranium which clearly, they have done. Still let us just hope
that certain nation's refrain from helping them with their nuclear
ambitions.
Still it looks more and more likely that soon they will have their bomb, it
will be major failure in the international system.
--
Honesty. Decency. Integrity
www.youtube.com/watch?v=33An6HotyuI
Nov 20, 2012
Hamas execution of 6 men, dragged in the streets of Gaza
> ļæ½At the same time, we proceed on the basis that Iran has an
> unconditional right to develop a civilian nuclear programme, including
> its right to enrichment, once all the outstanding issues have been
> clarified and Iranļæ½s entire nuclear activity has been placed under the
> its right to enrichment, once all the outstanding issues have been
> reliable and comprehensive monitoring of the IAEA (International
> Atomic Energy Agency).
This will not happen; the Iranians have already refused this, and the
> Atomic Energy Agency).
Russian know that too.
Once the Iranians convert their low-enriched uranium to a gaseous compound
they will get UF6, and then they will use their centrifuges to separate the
U235. They should be able to do that as the hard bit is getting the
low-enriched uranium which clearly, they have done. Still let us just hope
that certain nation's refrain from helping them with their nuclear
ambitions.
Still it looks more and more likely that soon they will have their bomb, it
will be major failure in the international system.
--
Honesty. Decency. Integrity
www.youtube.com/watch?v=33An6HotyuI
Nov 20, 2012
Hamas execution of 6 men, dragged in the streets of Gaza
The Peeler
Jun 20, 2013, 9:34:41 AM6/20/13
to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:08:03 +1000, Truth and honesty
<Tr...@honest.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:18:55 -0700 (PDT), HHW wrote:
>
>> �At the same time, we proceed on the basis that Iran has an
<Tr...@honest.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:18:55 -0700 (PDT), HHW wrote:
>
>> unconditional right to develop a civilian nuclear programme, including
>> its right to enrichment, once all the outstanding issues have been
>> clarified and Iran�s entire nuclear activity has been placed under the
>> its right to enrichment, once all the outstanding issues have been
>> reliable and comprehensive monitoring of the IAEA (International
>> Atomic Energy Agency).
>
>This will not happen; the Iranians have already refused this, and the
>Russian know that too.
Shut, up asshole. <GG>
>> Atomic Energy Agency).
>
>This will not happen; the Iranians have already refused this, and the
>Russian know that too.
Truth and honesty
Jun 20, 2013, 11:16:20 AM6/20/13
to
The Peeler
Jun 20, 2013, 12:01:48 PM6/20/13
to
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:16:20 +1000, Truth and honesty
<Tr...@honest.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:34:41 -0700, The Peeler wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:08:03 +1000, Truth and honesty
>> <Tr...@honest.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:18:55 -0700 (PDT), HHW wrote:
>>>
>>>> �At the same time, we proceed on the basis that Iran has an
>>>> unconditional right to develop a civilian nuclear programme, including
>>>> its right to enrichment, once all the outstanding issues have been
>>>> clarified and Iran�s entire nuclear activity has been placed under the
>>>> reliable and comprehensive monitoring of the IAEA (International
>>>> Atomic Energy Agency).
>>>
>>>This will not happen; the Iranians have already refused this, and the
>>>Russian know that too.
>>
>> Shut, up asshole. <GG>
>
>
>Why are you being so rude? I have never been rude to you.
Why, are you, such an asshole? I have never, been an asshole! <GB>
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:34:41 -0700, The Peeler wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:08:03 +1000, Truth and honesty
>> <Tr...@honest.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:18:55 -0700 (PDT), HHW wrote:
>>>
>>>> �At the same time, we proceed on the basis that Iran has an
>>>> unconditional right to develop a civilian nuclear programme, including
>>>> its right to enrichment, once all the outstanding issues have been
>>>> clarified and Iran�s entire nuclear activity has been placed under the
>>>> reliable and comprehensive monitoring of the IAEA (International
>>>> Atomic Energy Agency).
>>>
>>>This will not happen; the Iranians have already refused this, and the
>>>Russian know that too.
>>
>> Shut, up asshole. <GG>
>
>
>Why are you being so rude? I have never been rude to you.
HHW
Jun 20, 2013, 1:22:46 PM6/20/13
to
On Jun 20, 8:08 am, Truth and honesty <Tr...@honest.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:18:55 -0700 (PDT), HHW wrote:
> > ´At the same time, we proceed on the basis that Iran has an
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:18:55 -0700 (PDT), HHW wrote:
> > unconditional right to develop a civilian nuclear programme, including
> > its right to enrichment, once all the outstanding issues have been
> > clarified and Iranÿs entire nuclear activity has been placed under the
> > its right to enrichment, once all the outstanding issues have been
> > reliable and comprehensive monitoring of the IAEA (International
> > Atomic Energy Agency).
>
> This will not happen; the Iranians have already refused this, and the
> Russian know that too.
That was then, this is now. As I predicted you want to "bomb them
> > Atomic Energy Agency).
>
> This will not happen; the Iranians have already refused this, and the
> Russian know that too.
anyway".
> Once the Iranians convert their low-enriched uranium to a gaseous compound
> they will get UF6, and then they will use their centrifuges to separate the
> U235. They should be able to do that as the hard bit is getting the
> low-enriched uranium which clearly, they have done. Still let us just hope
> that certain nation's refrain from helping them with their nuclear
> ambitions.
> Still it looks more and more likely that soon they will have their bomb, it
> will be major failure in the international system.
would not be of much interest. Netanyahu has been threatening the
world with an Iranian bomb every other day for years now.
NEMO
Jun 20, 2013, 2:24:43 PM6/20/13
to
'' I guess I'll have to stay until sharavi croaks.''
Or maybe you'll be first, you assclown/buhat......
It can be arranged!
Or maybe you'll be first, you assclown/buhat......
It can be arranged!
NEMO
Jun 20, 2013, 2:26:54 PM6/20/13
to
'' I have never, been an asshole! <GB>''
Is that what your gaping arsehole told you, fool?
"Faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaart!"
Is that what your gaping arsehole told you, fool?
"Faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaart!"
The Peeler
Jun 20, 2013, 2:30:50 PM6/20/13
to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:24:43 -0700 (PDT), NEMO
<brianlam...@excite.com> wrote:
>'' I guess I'll have to stay until sharavi croaks.''
>
>Or maybe you'll be first, you assclown/buhat......
Or, may be you, will Brian. You're, 80 years old innit! <BGEV>
<brianlam...@excite.com> wrote:
>'' I guess I'll have to stay until sharavi croaks.''
>
>Or maybe you'll be first, you assclown/buhat......
The Peeler
Jun 20, 2013, 2:31:14 PM6/20/13
to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:26:54 -0700 (PDT), NEMO
<brianlam...@excite.com> wrote:
>'' �I have never, been an asshole! <GB>''
Yes you, HAVE Brian. ALWAYS innit! <EV>
<brianlam...@excite.com> wrote:
>'' �I have never, been an asshole! <GB>''
Yes you, HAVE Brian. ALWAYS innit! <EV>
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
The Peeler
Jun 20, 2013, 3:54:32 PM6/20/13
to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:00:24 +0200, The Peeler
<finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:34:41 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
>sci and scj, FAKING his time zone again and IMPERSONATING his master, The
>own shit, Grik psycho that I am!
YUK! <EBGC>
<finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:34:41 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
>sci and scj, FAKING his time zone again and IMPERSONATING his master, The
>Peeler, wrote:
>
>
>>>This will not happen; the Iranians have already refused this, and the
>>>Russian know that too.
>>
>> Shut, up asshole. <GG>
>
>Pull my Grik head out of my Grik ass and let me start smelling the Turkish coffee instead of my
>
>
>>>This will not happen; the Iranians have already refused this, and the
>>>Russian know that too.
>>
>> Shut, up asshole. <GG>
>
>own shit, Grik psycho that I am!
YUK! <EBGC>
The Peeler
Jun 20, 2013, 4:01:38 PM6/20/13
to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:07:14 +0200, The Peeler
<finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:01:48 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
>considered an ASSHOLE by all kinds of people from all kinds of ngs! LOL
Rather Grik anus! Rather very much innit! LOL2
<finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:01:48 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
>sci and scj, FAKING his time zone again and IMPERSONATING his master, The
>Peeler, wrote:
>
>
>Peeler, wrote:
>
>
>>>Why are you being so rude? I have never been rude to you.
>>
>> Why, are you, such an asshole? I have never, been an asshole! <GB>
>
>Rather ironic, coming from someone like me known as "The Grik anus" and who is
>>
>> Why, are you, such an asshole? I have never, been an asshole! <GB>
>
>considered an ASSHOLE by all kinds of people from all kinds of ngs! LOL
Rather Grik anus! Rather very much innit! LOL2
The Peeler
Jun 20, 2013, 4:12:21 PM6/20/13
to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:20:04 +0200, The Peeler
<finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:30:50 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
>abnormal Grik psycho that I am? LOL
Keep, sucking Grik anus! Sooner, or later a, jew rectum will come
along innit! LOL1
<finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:30:50 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
>sci and scj, FAKING his time zone again and IMPERSONATING his master, The
>Peeler, wrote:
>
>
>>>'' I guess I'll have to stay until sharavi croaks.''
>>>
>>>Or maybe you'll be first, you assclown/buhat......
>>
>> Or, may be you, will Brian. You're, 80 years old innit! <BGEV>
>
>Sucking on my Grik pacifiers again, my sick Grik delusions, ridiculous
>
>
>>>'' I guess I'll have to stay until sharavi croaks.''
>>>
>>>Or maybe you'll be first, you assclown/buhat......
>>
>> Or, may be you, will Brian. You're, 80 years old innit! <BGEV>
>
>abnormal Grik psycho that I am? LOL
Keep, sucking Grik anus! Sooner, or later a, jew rectum will come
along innit! LOL1
The Peeler
Jun 20, 2013, 4:13:16 PM6/20/13
to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:20:34 +0200, The Peeler
<finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:31:14 -0700, The Rectu, the resident psychopath of
>
>My asshole tells me so ALWAYS and EVERY DAY, right, I'm an all-time Grik asshole!
>LMAO!
Innit Grik anus! LMAO2
<finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:31:14 -0700, The Rectu, the resident psychopath of
>sci and scj, FAKING his time zone again and IMPERSONATING his master, The
>Peeler, wrote:
>
>>> '' I have never, been an asshole! <GB>''
>>>
>
>>> '' I have never, been an asshole! <GB>''
>>>
>>> Is that what your gaping arsehole told you, fool?
>>>
>>> "Faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaart!"
>>
>> Yes it, DID Brian. ALWAYS innit! <EV>
>>>
>>> "Faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaart!"
>>
>
>My asshole tells me so ALWAYS and EVERY DAY, right, I'm an all-time Grik asshole!
>LMAO!
Innit Grik anus! LMAO2
Lee Lanau
Jun 20, 2013, 5:16:34 PM6/20/13
to
"HHW" wrote in message
news:11ee1682-0496-47ac...@i1g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
The Peeler
Jun 20, 2013, 5:32:12 PM6/20/13
to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:16:34 -0500, "Lee Lanau" <lee_...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Shut, the fuck, up semitic asshole.
<tsk>
wrote:
<tsk>
Message has been deleted
The Peeler
Jun 20, 2013, 5:52:59 PM6/20/13
to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 23:41:13 +0200, The Peeler
<finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:32:12 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
YUK! <VVGGEEB>
<finish...@themoronicRevd.invalid> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:32:12 -0700, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
>sci and scj, FAKING his time zone again and IMPERSONATING his master, The
>Peeler, wrote:
>
>Peeler, wrote:
>
>>>(Description of Source: Moscow Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
>>>Russian Federation in Russian � Official website of the Russian
>>>Ministry of Foreign Affairs; URL: http://www.mid.ru)
>>>
>>>That was a short retirement.
>>
>> Shut, the fuck, up semitic asshole.
>> <tsk>
>
>Pull my Grik head out of my Grik anus, I'm just a shit-eating Grik psycho!
>>>Russian Federation in Russian � Official website of the Russian
>>>Ministry of Foreign Affairs; URL: http://www.mid.ru)
>>>
>>>That was a short retirement.
>>
>> Shut, the fuck, up semitic asshole.
>> <tsk>
>
YUK! <VVGGEEB>
Truth and honesty
Jun 22, 2013, 6:49:25 AM6/22/13
to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT), HHW wrote:
> On Jun 20, 8:08�am, Truth and honesty <Tr...@honest.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:18:55 -0700 (PDT), HHW wrote:
>
>>> �At the same time, we proceed on the basis that Iran has an
>>> unconditional right to develop a civilian nuclear programme, including
>>> its right to enrichment, once all the outstanding issues have been
>>> clarified and Iran�s entire nuclear activity has been placed under the
> On Jun 20, 8:08�am, Truth and honesty <Tr...@honest.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:18:55 -0700 (PDT), HHW wrote:
>
>>> �At the same time, we proceed on the basis that Iran has an
>>> unconditional right to develop a civilian nuclear programme, including
>>> its right to enrichment, once all the outstanding issues have been
>>> reliable and comprehensive monitoring of the IAEA (International
>>> Atomic Energy Agency).
>>
>> This will not happen; the Iranians have already refused this, and the
>> Russian know that too.
>
> That was then, this is now. As I predicted you want to "bomb them
> anyway".
>
>> Once the Iranians convert their low-enriched uranium to a gaseous compound
>> they will get UF6, and then they will use their centrifuges to separate the
>> U235. They should be able to do that as the hard bit is getting the
>> low-enriched uranium which clearly, they have done. Still let us just hope
>> that certain nation's refrain from helping them with their nuclear
>> ambitions.
>
> Which are competence in radiation treatment of tumors?
>
>> Still it looks more and more likely that soon they will have their bomb, it
>> will be major failure in the international system.
>
> The article says the exact opposite. If that weren't the case it
> would not be of much interest. Netanyahu has been threatening the
> world with an Iranian bomb every other day for years now.
For you the only important issue is that Assad regime will have a nuclear
>>> Atomic Energy Agency).
>>
>> This will not happen; the Iranians have already refused this, and the
>> Russian know that too.
>
> That was then, this is now. As I predicted you want to "bomb them
> anyway".
>
>> Once the Iranians convert their low-enriched uranium to a gaseous compound
>> they will get UF6, and then they will use their centrifuges to separate the
>> U235. They should be able to do that as the hard bit is getting the
>> low-enriched uranium which clearly, they have done. Still let us just hope
>> that certain nation's refrain from helping them with their nuclear
>> ambitions.
>
> Which are competence in radiation treatment of tumors?
>
>> Still it looks more and more likely that soon they will have their bomb, it
>> will be major failure in the international system.
>
> The article says the exact opposite. If that weren't the case it
> would not be of much interest. Netanyahu has been threatening the
> world with an Iranian bomb every other day for years now.
ally Iran.
0 new messages