info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold it
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Michael Ejercito
Apr 3, 2012, 5:11:52 PM4/3/12
to
http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44860
The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold
it
By Ted Belman
The United Nations’ Human Rights Council has resorted to official
enquiries as a precursor to damning Israel — the most recent of which
was the Goldstone Enquiry on Cast Lead, Israel’s attack on Hamas in
Gaza. And we know how that turned out. Israel was accused of all
manner of war crimes, though none were proven to have been committed.
Last week, the UNHRC passed a resolution to “dispatch an independent
international fact-finding mission, to be appointed by the president
of the Human Rights Council, to investigate the implications of the
Israeli settlements on the civil, political, economic, social and
cultural rights of the Palestinian people throughout the Occupied
Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.” The resolution was
based, inter alia, on a written statement produced by Badil Resource
Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights, a Palestinian NGO
financed by a number of European countries.
This statement, under the heading “Concentration and Containment,”
accused Israel of applying various land laws and planning laws which
aimed at “the ‘confiscation and colonization’ of the vast majority of
Palestinian owned land; and the ‘concentration and containment’ of the
Palestinian population within small pockets of land, which are
dispersed and fragmented across the OPT and within Israel.” A number
of allegations are set out in support.
Given the liberal proclivities of the Israel High Court, there should
be no worry that anyone’s rights are being trampled on in Judea and
Samaria, or in Jerusalem, for that matter. Alan Dershowitz praised
the Court with these words:
“Many also seem to be unaware of the fact that Israel’s record
on human rights and freedoms is among the best in the world, and
certainly the best in the region. Israel has a completely free press,
which is generally highly critical of the Israeli government. No Arab
country has a free press, nor does the Palestinian Authority. Israel
has a completely independent judiciary, the only one in the entire
area. Its Supreme Court, one of the best in the world, is the only
court in which an Arab in the Middle East can expect to get justice in
lawsuits brought against any government.”
So why resort to the UNHRC? Simple. The report will be a basis to
delegitimize and demonize Israel and to force her to change her legal
course.
The acronym “OPT” stands for “Occupied Palestinian Territory.” The
Arabs no longer refer to Judea and Samaria as the “West Bank,” which
was Jordanian nomenclature during its period of occupation from 1948
to 1967; they now prefer to brand it as Palestinian land which is
occupied.
Not only is the land not “occupied,” but it is also not
“Palestinian.” It never was “Palestinian” — i.e., subject to
Palestinian sovereignty. Sovereignty of Judea and Samaria has never
been allocated, nor has sovereignty been claimed. Israel refers to
the region’s status as “disputed,” but I personally reject such a
description because the Palestinians have no legal claim to this
territory. Israel alone has the right to claim sovereignty over these
lands.
During the first half of the last century until the State of Israel
was declared in 1948, the Jews living under the Palestine Mandate were
referred to as Palestinians and thought of themselves as such. The
Arabs living there were generally considered Syrians or Jordanians or
just plain Arabs. It was not until the sixties and seventies that
they began calling themselves Palestinians so as to claim all of
Mandated Palestine for themselves.
Howard Grief, the author of The Legal Foundation and Borders of Israel
under International Law and the leading expert on the subject, co-
copied me with three powerful letters in defense of Israel’s rights,
in which he writes:
The country of Palestine was created in April 1920 at the San
Remo Peace Conference for one purpose only – to be the Jewish National
Home, and the term “Occupied Palestinian Territory” is thus an
oxymoron since Palestine was never intended to be an Arab land under
international law[.]” …
Upon the re-birth of the Jewish State on May 15, 1948, Jewish
legal rights to Palestine were devolved upon the State of Israel.
Whatever you may think, those rights never lapsed, were never annulled
or voided and never validly or legally transferred to an Arab people
known as “Palestinians”, as you so wrongly assume. Moreover,
subsequent events – such as the 1947 Partition Resolution, Security
Council Resolution 242, the Israel-PLO Agreements or the Road Map
Peace Plan – have not superseded or curtailed the rights of the Jewish
People to former Mandated Palestine[.]
Israel’s Deputy FM Ayalon explained The Truth about the West Bank in a
now famous video.
The charters of both Fatah and Hamas and the Arabs in general consider
the San Remo Resolution and the Mandate to be passed in violation of
Arab rights and therefore illegal. They want these laws reversed and
Israel destroyed. They have no respect for international law, but
they bash Israel in the name of international law, though Israel is
not in violation of it.
The international community accepts these legal determinations but
applies the terms of the Fourth Geneva Convention (FGC) to classify
Judea and Samaria as occupied territory. Opponents of Israel cite in
support the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on
the apparently questionable legality of the security fence built by
Israel. Israel chose not to participate in its hearing. The ICJ
determined that the FGC applied and that the construction fence was
illegal. With all due respect to them, I suggest that this
determination was wrong.
FGC provides:
In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in
peacetime, the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared
war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more
of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not
recognized by one of them.
The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total
occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party.
Previous to the ’67 War, Jordon was in possession of the lands, but
Jordan’s sovereignty over them was recognized only by Britain and
Pakistan. Thus, the lands in question were not “the territory of a
High Contracting Party.”
The IJC finessed this precondition by holding that
“the Convention applies, in particular, in any territory
occupied in the course of the conflict by one of the contracting
parties.”
Be that as it may, the Palestinians, as set out in the statement
submitted by BADILS, are not really complaining about violations of
the FGC so much as they are complaining about the terms of the Oslo
Accords, which divide the land into Areas A, B, and C. The
Palestinians are not satisfied with building in Areas A and B, where
they are fully in control; instead, they want to build in Area C,
where they have no rights and where Israel is in control.
Accordingly, they ask of the HRC, inter alia, to:
Condemn Israel’s policy of land and resources grab in area c and
in east Jerusalem in order to build and/or expand colonies while the
Palestinian communities in these areas are prohibited from acquiring
permits to build houses on their own land. To call upon Israel to
immediately revoke all orders concerning the demolition of houses and
eviction of Palestinians in the OPT.
Condemn Israel’s practice of prohibiting Palestinians living in
Area C and in East Jerusalem of receiving building permits and
therewith hindering the natural growth of those communities.
They also ask that the HRC to:
Register Israel’s system of institutionalized discrimination
that distinguishes between Jewish nationals and citizens and
Palestinian Arabs and extends from Israel Proper to the OPT.
Register Israel’s continuing practices of house demolitions,
land confiscations, and its adoption of policies resulting in
inadequate housing and living conditions.
Israel is treating all residents living in Judea and Samaria, whether
Arab or Jew, pursuant to Occupation Law and is treating all residents
of Israel, whether Jew or Arab, according to Israeli law. Any house
demolitions or land confiscation in either place takes place according
to the law of the land.
Essentially, the Palestinians, with the aid of the international
community, keep rewriting the rules of the game to favor their cause.
Israel accepted Res. 242 in ’67, which allowed her to stay in
occupation until she had an agreement for secured and recognized
borders. The resolution also permitted Israel to keep some of the
land. It was not until ’83 that Yasser Arafat accepted the
resolution, which he was required to do as a precondition to entering
the Oslo Accords. In reality, he and the PA rejected the resolution,
and they still do, as they demand 100% of the land in any settlement.
And the PA violates said resolution by inciting and perpetrating
violence every day.
The Oslo Accords were silent on the question of settlement
construction, yet the PA demands the cessation of same as a
precondition to negotiations. And now they are demanding that the
Accords be amended to allow them to build in Area C.
Unfortunately, the U.N., the EU, and even the U.S. support them in
their endeavors.
The sooner Israel abrogates the Oslo Accords for cause, the better.
But that won’t stop the delegitimizing and demonizing. It will just
change the playing field.
Pursuant to her legal rights as defined above by Howard Grief, Israel
should claim sovereignty over Area C and settle it as she sees fit.
It is her right.
The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold
it
By Ted Belman
The United Nations’ Human Rights Council has resorted to official
enquiries as a precursor to damning Israel — the most recent of which
was the Goldstone Enquiry on Cast Lead, Israel’s attack on Hamas in
Gaza. And we know how that turned out. Israel was accused of all
manner of war crimes, though none were proven to have been committed.
Last week, the UNHRC passed a resolution to “dispatch an independent
international fact-finding mission, to be appointed by the president
of the Human Rights Council, to investigate the implications of the
Israeli settlements on the civil, political, economic, social and
cultural rights of the Palestinian people throughout the Occupied
Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.” The resolution was
based, inter alia, on a written statement produced by Badil Resource
Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights, a Palestinian NGO
financed by a number of European countries.
This statement, under the heading “Concentration and Containment,”
accused Israel of applying various land laws and planning laws which
aimed at “the ‘confiscation and colonization’ of the vast majority of
Palestinian owned land; and the ‘concentration and containment’ of the
Palestinian population within small pockets of land, which are
dispersed and fragmented across the OPT and within Israel.” A number
of allegations are set out in support.
Given the liberal proclivities of the Israel High Court, there should
be no worry that anyone’s rights are being trampled on in Judea and
Samaria, or in Jerusalem, for that matter. Alan Dershowitz praised
the Court with these words:
“Many also seem to be unaware of the fact that Israel’s record
on human rights and freedoms is among the best in the world, and
certainly the best in the region. Israel has a completely free press,
which is generally highly critical of the Israeli government. No Arab
country has a free press, nor does the Palestinian Authority. Israel
has a completely independent judiciary, the only one in the entire
area. Its Supreme Court, one of the best in the world, is the only
court in which an Arab in the Middle East can expect to get justice in
lawsuits brought against any government.”
So why resort to the UNHRC? Simple. The report will be a basis to
delegitimize and demonize Israel and to force her to change her legal
course.
The acronym “OPT” stands for “Occupied Palestinian Territory.” The
Arabs no longer refer to Judea and Samaria as the “West Bank,” which
was Jordanian nomenclature during its period of occupation from 1948
to 1967; they now prefer to brand it as Palestinian land which is
occupied.
Not only is the land not “occupied,” but it is also not
“Palestinian.” It never was “Palestinian” — i.e., subject to
Palestinian sovereignty. Sovereignty of Judea and Samaria has never
been allocated, nor has sovereignty been claimed. Israel refers to
the region’s status as “disputed,” but I personally reject such a
description because the Palestinians have no legal claim to this
territory. Israel alone has the right to claim sovereignty over these
lands.
During the first half of the last century until the State of Israel
was declared in 1948, the Jews living under the Palestine Mandate were
referred to as Palestinians and thought of themselves as such. The
Arabs living there were generally considered Syrians or Jordanians or
just plain Arabs. It was not until the sixties and seventies that
they began calling themselves Palestinians so as to claim all of
Mandated Palestine for themselves.
Howard Grief, the author of The Legal Foundation and Borders of Israel
under International Law and the leading expert on the subject, co-
copied me with three powerful letters in defense of Israel’s rights,
in which he writes:
The country of Palestine was created in April 1920 at the San
Remo Peace Conference for one purpose only – to be the Jewish National
Home, and the term “Occupied Palestinian Territory” is thus an
oxymoron since Palestine was never intended to be an Arab land under
international law[.]” …
Upon the re-birth of the Jewish State on May 15, 1948, Jewish
legal rights to Palestine were devolved upon the State of Israel.
Whatever you may think, those rights never lapsed, were never annulled
or voided and never validly or legally transferred to an Arab people
known as “Palestinians”, as you so wrongly assume. Moreover,
subsequent events – such as the 1947 Partition Resolution, Security
Council Resolution 242, the Israel-PLO Agreements or the Road Map
Peace Plan – have not superseded or curtailed the rights of the Jewish
People to former Mandated Palestine[.]
Israel’s Deputy FM Ayalon explained The Truth about the West Bank in a
now famous video.
The charters of both Fatah and Hamas and the Arabs in general consider
the San Remo Resolution and the Mandate to be passed in violation of
Arab rights and therefore illegal. They want these laws reversed and
Israel destroyed. They have no respect for international law, but
they bash Israel in the name of international law, though Israel is
not in violation of it.
The international community accepts these legal determinations but
applies the terms of the Fourth Geneva Convention (FGC) to classify
Judea and Samaria as occupied territory. Opponents of Israel cite in
support the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on
the apparently questionable legality of the security fence built by
Israel. Israel chose not to participate in its hearing. The ICJ
determined that the FGC applied and that the construction fence was
illegal. With all due respect to them, I suggest that this
determination was wrong.
FGC provides:
In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in
peacetime, the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared
war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more
of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not
recognized by one of them.
The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total
occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party.
Previous to the ’67 War, Jordon was in possession of the lands, but
Jordan’s sovereignty over them was recognized only by Britain and
Pakistan. Thus, the lands in question were not “the territory of a
High Contracting Party.”
The IJC finessed this precondition by holding that
“the Convention applies, in particular, in any territory
occupied in the course of the conflict by one of the contracting
parties.”
Be that as it may, the Palestinians, as set out in the statement
submitted by BADILS, are not really complaining about violations of
the FGC so much as they are complaining about the terms of the Oslo
Accords, which divide the land into Areas A, B, and C. The
Palestinians are not satisfied with building in Areas A and B, where
they are fully in control; instead, they want to build in Area C,
where they have no rights and where Israel is in control.
Accordingly, they ask of the HRC, inter alia, to:
Condemn Israel’s policy of land and resources grab in area c and
in east Jerusalem in order to build and/or expand colonies while the
Palestinian communities in these areas are prohibited from acquiring
permits to build houses on their own land. To call upon Israel to
immediately revoke all orders concerning the demolition of houses and
eviction of Palestinians in the OPT.
Condemn Israel’s practice of prohibiting Palestinians living in
Area C and in East Jerusalem of receiving building permits and
therewith hindering the natural growth of those communities.
They also ask that the HRC to:
Register Israel’s system of institutionalized discrimination
that distinguishes between Jewish nationals and citizens and
Palestinian Arabs and extends from Israel Proper to the OPT.
Register Israel’s continuing practices of house demolitions,
land confiscations, and its adoption of policies resulting in
inadequate housing and living conditions.
Israel is treating all residents living in Judea and Samaria, whether
Arab or Jew, pursuant to Occupation Law and is treating all residents
of Israel, whether Jew or Arab, according to Israeli law. Any house
demolitions or land confiscation in either place takes place according
to the law of the land.
Essentially, the Palestinians, with the aid of the international
community, keep rewriting the rules of the game to favor their cause.
Israel accepted Res. 242 in ’67, which allowed her to stay in
occupation until she had an agreement for secured and recognized
borders. The resolution also permitted Israel to keep some of the
land. It was not until ’83 that Yasser Arafat accepted the
resolution, which he was required to do as a precondition to entering
the Oslo Accords. In reality, he and the PA rejected the resolution,
and they still do, as they demand 100% of the land in any settlement.
And the PA violates said resolution by inciting and perpetrating
violence every day.
The Oslo Accords were silent on the question of settlement
construction, yet the PA demands the cessation of same as a
precondition to negotiations. And now they are demanding that the
Accords be amended to allow them to build in Area C.
Unfortunately, the U.N., the EU, and even the U.S. support them in
their endeavors.
The sooner Israel abrogates the Oslo Accords for cause, the better.
But that won’t stop the delegitimizing and demonizing. It will just
change the playing field.
Pursuant to her legal rights as defined above by Howard Grief, Israel
should claim sovereignty over Area C and settle it as she sees fit.
It is her right.
The Revd
Apr 4, 2012, 7:08:38 AM4/4/12
to
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44860
>
>The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold
>it
>
>By Ted Belman
Another jew rectum for you to wrap your lips around, gook?
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44860
>
>The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold
>it
>
>By Ted Belman
The Peeler
Apr 4, 2012, 7:13:59 AM4/4/12
to
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:08:38 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
>>
>>By Ted Belman
>
> Another jew rectum for you to wrap your lips around, gook?
Or rather another opportunity for you to quickly make an ass of yourself in
puplic again, The Rectum? <BG>
--
Retarded, subnormal and extremely proud of it: our resident psychopath, The
Retard (aka "The Rectum").
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
>>
>>By Ted Belman
>
> Another jew rectum for you to wrap your lips around, gook?
puplic again, The Rectum? <BG>
--
Retarded, subnormal and extremely proud of it: our resident psychopath, The
Retard (aka "The Rectum").
Michael Ejercito
Apr 4, 2012, 1:07:02 PM4/4/12
to
On Apr 4, 4:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44860
>
> >The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold
> >it
>
> >By Ted Belman
>
> Another jew rectum for you to wrap your lips around, gook?
You are a Nazi.
> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44860
>
> >The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold
> >it
>
> >By Ted Belman
>
> Another jew rectum for you to wrap your lips around, gook?
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.
Michael
The Revd
Apr 4, 2012, 3:49:35 PM4/4/12
to
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 4, 4:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44860
>>
>> >The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold
>> >it
>>
>> >By Ted Belman
>>
>> Another jew rectum for you to wrap your lips around, gook?
> You are a Nazi.
YOU are a gook.
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 4, 4:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44860
>>
>> >The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold
>> >it
>>
>> >By Ted Belman
>>
>> Another jew rectum for you to wrap your lips around, gook?
> You are a Nazi.
> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
The Peeler
Apr 4, 2012, 4:13:05 PM4/4/12
to
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:49:35 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
psychopathic swine. And the best part of it: You KNOW it! LOL
>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> As a craven gook who sucks jew rectums, you are, below all else.
As the sick subnormal degenerate perverted psychopathic swine that you are,
NOBODY and NOTHING is ever below you!
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
farted:
>> You are a Nazi.
>
> YOU are a gook.
He isn't. But you are indeed a sick subnormal degenerate perverted
>
> YOU are a gook.
psychopathic swine. And the best part of it: You KNOW it! LOL
>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> As a craven gook who sucks jew rectums, you are, below all else.
NOBODY and NOTHING is ever below you!
Michael Ejercito
Apr 4, 2012, 10:34:03 PM4/4/12
to
On Apr 4, 12:49 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 4, 4:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44860
>
> >> >The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold
> >> >it
>
> >> >By Ted Belman
>
> >> Another jew rectum for you to wrap your lips around, gook?
> > You are a Nazi.
>
> YOU are a gook.
That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
> >On Apr 4, 4:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44860
>
> >> >The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold
> >> >it
>
> >> >By Ted Belman
>
> >> Another jew rectum for you to wrap your lips around, gook?
> > You are a Nazi.
>
> YOU are a gook.
>
> > As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> As a craven gook who sucks jew rectums, you are, below all else.
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
Bill explains what nithings are.
http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings
by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”
We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”
We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings
Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,
The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.
A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.
The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”
The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”
“Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.
The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.
This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.
In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.
The Revd
Apr 5, 2012, 6:08:13 AM4/5/12
to
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:34:03 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 4, 12:49 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 4, 4:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44860
>>
>> >> >The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold
>> >> >it
>>
>> >> >By Ted Belman
>>
>> >> Another jew rectum for you to wrap your lips around, gook?
>> > You are a Nazi.
>>
>> YOU are a gook.
> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
How can it be, gook? You're not even WHITE.
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 4, 12:49 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 4, 4:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44860
>>
>> >> >The UN acts in violation of International Law while claiming to uphold
>> >> >it
>>
>> >> >By Ted Belman
>>
>> >> Another jew rectum for you to wrap your lips around, gook?
>> > You are a Nazi.
>>
>> YOU are a gook.
> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
<mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
The Peeler
Apr 5, 2012, 7:03:41 AM4/5/12
to
On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 06:08:13 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
degenerates like you euthanized!
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
>>>
farted:
>>>
>>> YOU are a gook.
>> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> How can it be, gook? You're not even WHITE.
WHITES spit on someone like you! Some WHITES even suggest to have
>> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> How can it be, gook? You're not even WHITE.
degenerates like you euthanized!
Michael Ejercito
Apr 5, 2012, 11:00:07 AM4/5/12
to
On Apr 5, 3:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:34:03 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> <mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
The following link explains you.
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-nazi
Michael
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:34:03 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 4, 12:49 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > You are a Nazi.
>
> >> YOU are a gook.
> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> How can it be, gook? You're not even WHITE.
That is just a superficial characteristic.
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 4, 12:49 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > You are a Nazi.
>
> >> YOU are a gook.
> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> How can it be, gook? You're not even WHITE.
>
> <mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-nazi
Michael
The Revd
Apr 5, 2012, 11:50:20 AM4/5/12
to
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 5, 3:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:34:03 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 4, 12:49 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > You are a Nazi.
>>
>> >> YOU are a gook.
>> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>>
>> How can it be, gook? You're not even WHITE.
> That is just a superficial characteristic.
Skin colour is the DECIDING characteristic, you yellow slitty-eyed
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 5, 3:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:34:03 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 4, 12:49 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > You are a Nazi.
>>
>> >> YOU are a gook.
>> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>>
>> How can it be, gook? You're not even WHITE.
> That is just a superficial characteristic.
bastard.
>>
>> <mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
> The following link explains you.
>
> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-nazi
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-gook
The Peeler
Apr 5, 2012, 12:59:05 PM4/5/12
to
On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:50:20 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
>
> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-gook
Your "link" is EXACTLY like you and your "life", The Rectum: dead, defunct,
malfunctioning ...and a laugh! LOL
--
The top 5 truths about our colostomy bag wearing resident psychopath, aka
"The Rectum":
the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
he can't get out of the house anymore,
he got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
he can't FUCK anymore,
he got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
>
> This link expiains [SIC] YOU.
farted:
>
>
> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-gook
Your "link" is EXACTLY like you and your "life", The Rectum: dead, defunct,
malfunctioning ...and a laugh! LOL
--
The top 5 truths about our colostomy bag wearing resident psychopath, aka
"The Rectum":
the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
he can't get out of the house anymore,
he got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
he can't FUCK anymore,
he got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!
Michael Ejercito
Apr 5, 2012, 8:15:28 PM4/5/12
to
On Apr 5, 8:50 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 5, 3:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:34:03 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> >> How can it be, gook? You're not even WHITE.
> > That is just a superficial characteristic.
>
> Skin colour is the DECIDING characteristic, you yellow slitty-eyed
> bastard.
It does not decide honor, decency, or integrity, you nithing.
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 5, 3:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:34:03 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> >> How can it be, gook? You're not even WHITE.
> > That is just a superficial characteristic.
>
> Skin colour is the DECIDING characteristic, you yellow slitty-eyed
> bastard.
>
>
>
> >> <mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
> > The following link explains you.
>
>
> This link expiains YOU.
>
> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
The following article explains your pathology.
History's oldest hatred
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
March 11, 2009
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred
ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so it
is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-
Semitism" -- a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-
hatred -- is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never had
anything to do with Semites or being Semitic. (That is why those who
protest that Arabs cannot be anti-Semitic since "Arabs are Semites
too" speak either from ignorance or disingenuousness.)
Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable and unyielding as
anti-Semitism. "The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan,
religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis
Prager in Why the Jews?, their classic study of anti-Semitism.
"Fascists have accused them of being Communists, and Communists have
branded them capitalists. Jews who live in non-Jewish societies have
been accused of having dual loyalties, while Jews who live in the
Jewish state have been condemned as 'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied,
and rich Jews are resented. Jews have been branded as both rootless
cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews who assimilate have been
called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay together spark hatred
for remaining separate."
So hardy is anti-Semitism, it can flourish without Jews. Shakespeare's
poisonous depiction of the Jewish moneylender Shylock was written for
audiences that had never seen a Jew, all Jews having been expelled
from England more than 300 years earlier. Anti-Semitic bigotry infests
Saudi Arabia, where Jews have not dwelt in at least five centuries;
its malignance is suggested by the government daily Al-Riyadh, which
published an essay claiming that Jews have a taste for "pastries mixed
with human blood."
Esther Confounding Haman (Engraving by Gustave Doré, 1875)
There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the
king:
"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among ... all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it
be written that they be destroyed." After winning royal assent, Haman
makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and destroy all the Jews, the
young and the elderly, children and women, in one day . . . and to
take their property for plunder."
What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism -- just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the
Church or Islam, or their expulsion from so many lands in Europe and
the Middle East, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and
Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the
president of Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state,
when a leader of Hamas vows to kill Jewish children around the world,
when firebombs are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and
Chicago, it is not because Jews deserve to be victimized.
Some Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. The Jewish
people are the object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the
haters' rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What, after all, do those who vilify Jews as greedy
bankers have in common with those who revile them as seditious
Bolsheviks? Nothing, save an irrational obsession with Jews.
At one point in the book of Esther, Haman lets the mask slip. He
boasts to his friends and family of "the glory of his riches, and the
great number of his sons, and everything in which the king had
promoted him and elevated him." Still, he seethes with rage and
frustration: "Yet all this is worthless to me so long as I see
Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate." That is the
unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend in, to
abandon his values, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting
there -- undigested, unassimilated, and for that reason unbearable.
Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat; so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his national identity or his professional achievements.
Ultimately, however, it is the Jew's Jewishness, and the call to
higher standards that it represents, that the anti-Semite cannot
abide.
With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their
role in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures
too, as obsessive and indestructible -- and deadly -- as ever.
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)
Warhol
Apr 5, 2012, 9:17:08 PM4/5/12
to
Op 6-4-2012 2:15, Michael Ejercito schreef:
belong to tribe of Judah?... so how must we call such people, who in
fact don't belong to the Semite race or to tribe of the people of the
book(True Israelite of the 12 tribes)
amongst the yids there is not one who is from the bloodline of King
David or King Solomon... so yes the yids are racist and anti Semite and
insane bastards...
> ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so it
> is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-
> Semitism" -- a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
> Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
> Jew-
> hatred -- is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never had
> anything to do with Semites or being Semitic. (That is why those who
> protest that Arabs cannot be anti-Semitic since "Arabs are Semites
> too" speak either from ignorance or disingenuousness.)
First; can you prove yids are semites??? Second can you prove they
> is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-
> Semitism" -- a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
> Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
> Jew-
> hatred -- is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never had
> anything to do with Semites or being Semitic. (That is why those who
> protest that Arabs cannot be anti-Semitic since "Arabs are Semites
> too" speak either from ignorance or disingenuousness.)
belong to tribe of Judah?... so how must we call such people, who in
fact don't belong to the Semite race or to tribe of the people of the
book(True Israelite of the 12 tribes)
amongst the yids there is not one who is from the bloodline of King
David or King Solomon... so yes the yids are racist and anti Semite and
insane bastards...
The Revd
Apr 6, 2012, 6:28:51 AM4/6/12
to
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:15:28 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 5, 8:50 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 5, 3:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:34:03 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>>
>> >> How can it be, gook? You're not even WHITE.
>> > That is just a superficial characteristic.
>>
>> Skin colour is the DECIDING characteristic, you yellow slitty-eyed
>> bastard.
> It does not decide honor, decency, or integrity, you nithing.
It decides EVERYTHING, gook.
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 5, 8:50 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 5, 3:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:34:03 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>>
>> >> How can it be, gook? You're not even WHITE.
>> > That is just a superficial characteristic.
>>
>> Skin colour is the DECIDING characteristic, you yellow slitty-eyed
>> bastard.
> It does not decide honor, decency, or integrity, you nithing.
>>
>>
>>
>> >> <mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
>> > The following link explains you.
>>
>> > http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>>
>> This link expiains YOU.
>>
>> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
> The following article explains your pathology.
>History's oldest hatred
>
>by Jeff Jacoby
Are you going to celebrate jew Easter by sucking even more jew rectums
than usual, gook?
The Peeler
Apr 6, 2012, 6:35:25 AM4/6/12
to
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 06:28:51 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
unread>
How's your MISERY and DESPAIR while you are locked up in your room over
Easter again, The Rectum? Doing fine? Of COURSE, they do! LOL!!!
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
<snip our resident psychopath's usual hysterical and psychotic garbage
farted:
unread>
How's your MISERY and DESPAIR while you are locked up in your room over
Easter again, The Rectum? Doing fine? Of COURSE, they do! LOL!!!
Michael Ejercito
Apr 6, 2012, 12:36:30 PM4/6/12
to
On Apr 6, 3:28 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:15:28 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> Are you going to celebrate jew Easter by sucking even more jew rectums
> than usual, gook?
The following poem was dedicated to you.
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/msg/9a7063668ce49326
THE REVD WENT PODY BIG
The Revd went pody big in the street,
The Revd usually jacks his meat.
Oh that we gun him down,
Because he is a homosexual clown.
He’s a pedophile and an asshole to be,
His main pastime is playing with his pee-pee.
He smells like a sewer and farts real loud,
Of him the gays are very proud.
He molests his hand in an unnatural way.
That is why he’s a queer that is why he is gay.
Everybody hates his guts all the time,
In his ass he stuck a very ripe lime.
He’s a sodomite and a moron that needs to die,
He jacked-off in his mothers cherry pie.
He has zits and pimples all over his face,
He’s a monkey that was kicked out of the human race.
His penis is small,
Not big at all.
He’s an anti-Semitic prick,
With a midget dick.
So if you see the Revd do him one kind deed,
Kick him hard in the gut so out of his mouth he will bleed!
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:15:28 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 5, 8:50 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > The following link explains you.
>
> >> > http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>
> >> This link expiains YOU.
>
> >>http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
> > The following article explains your pathology.
>
> Sucking jew rectums explains YOURS, gook.
>
> >History's oldest hatred
>
> >by Jeff Jacoby
>
> History's oldest reason for hatred: jew behaviour.
And that Jew behaviour is standing for God-based morals and ethics.
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 5, 8:50 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > The following link explains you.
>
> >> > http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>
> >> This link expiains YOU.
>
> >>http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
> > The following article explains your pathology.
>
> Sucking jew rectums explains YOURS, gook.
>
> >History's oldest hatred
>
> >by Jeff Jacoby
>
> History's oldest reason for hatred: jew behaviour.
>
> Are you going to celebrate jew Easter by sucking even more jew rectums
> than usual, gook?
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/msg/9a7063668ce49326
THE REVD WENT PODY BIG
The Revd went pody big in the street,
The Revd usually jacks his meat.
Oh that we gun him down,
Because he is a homosexual clown.
He’s a pedophile and an asshole to be,
His main pastime is playing with his pee-pee.
He smells like a sewer and farts real loud,
Of him the gays are very proud.
He molests his hand in an unnatural way.
That is why he’s a queer that is why he is gay.
Everybody hates his guts all the time,
In his ass he stuck a very ripe lime.
He’s a sodomite and a moron that needs to die,
He jacked-off in his mothers cherry pie.
He has zits and pimples all over his face,
He’s a monkey that was kicked out of the human race.
His penis is small,
Not big at all.
He’s an anti-Semitic prick,
With a midget dick.
So if you see the Revd do him one kind deed,
Kick him hard in the gut so out of his mouth he will bleed!
The Revd
Apr 6, 2012, 1:08:34 PM4/6/12
to
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:36:30 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 6, 3:28 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:15:28 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 5, 8:50 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > The following link explains you.
>>
>> >> > http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>>
>> >> This link expiains YOU.
>>
>> >>http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>> > The following article explains your pathology.
>>
>> Sucking jew rectums explains YOURS, gook.
>>
>> >History's oldest hatred
>>
>> >by Jeff Jacoby
>>
>> History's oldest reason for hatred: jew behaviour.
> And that Jew behaviour is standing for God-based morals and ethics.
LOL! That jew behaviour KILLED your God, gook!
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 6, 3:28 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:15:28 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 5, 8:50 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > The following link explains you.
>>
>> >> > http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>>
>> >> This link expiains YOU.
>>
>> >>http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>> > The following article explains your pathology.
>>
>> Sucking jew rectums explains YOURS, gook.
>>
>> >History's oldest hatred
>>
>> >by Jeff Jacoby
>>
>> History's oldest reason for hatred: jew behaviour.
> And that Jew behaviour is standing for God-based morals and ethics.
The Peeler
Apr 6, 2012, 1:14:44 PM4/6/12
to
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:08:34 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
It's alway subnormal idiots like you that are responsible for the death of
millions of innocent people!
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
farted:
>> And that Jew behaviour is standing for God-based morals and ethics.
>
> LOL! That jew behaviour KILLED your God, gook!
>
> <mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
It was subnormal idiots like YOU that killed your God, The Rectum!
>
> LOL! That jew behaviour KILLED your God, gook!
>
> <mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
It's alway subnormal idiots like you that are responsible for the death of
millions of innocent people!
Michael Ejercito
Apr 6, 2012, 2:28:50 PM4/6/12
to
Jesus, He stood for God-based morals and ethics- Jewish behaviour. One
could argue that He was killed for that.
>
> <mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.
> <mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism/msg/744028e4fe196d22
"Why do you think it constitutes animal abuse? If you or I tried to
fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice? It should not
only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative lifestyle.
The fact is that animals are incapable of giving or refusing
consent. To imagine otherwise is a ridiculous anthropomorphism (look
it up, Levinstein). Do we ask animals for their consent before we
kill them and eat them? By comparison, getting fucked is a minor
inconvenience"- The Revd
The Revd
Apr 6, 2012, 2:35:38 PM4/6/12
to
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 6, 10:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:36:30 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 6, 3:28 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:15:28 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > The following article explains your pathology.
>>
>> >> Sucking jew rectums explains YOURS, gook.
>>
>> >> >History's oldest hatred
>>
>> >> >by Jeff Jacoby
>>
>> >> History's oldest reason for hatred: jew behaviour.
>> > And that Jew behaviour is standing for God-based morals and ethics.
>>
>> LOL! That jew behaviour KILLED your God, gook!
> God was incaranted as a Jewish resident of Galilee named Jesus. As
>Jesus, He stood for God-based morals and ethics- Jewish behaviour. One
>could argue that He was killed for that.
LOL! One could also argue that you suck the rectums of the very jews
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 6, 10:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:36:30 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 6, 3:28 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:15:28 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > The following article explains your pathology.
>>
>> >> Sucking jew rectums explains YOURS, gook.
>>
>> >> >History's oldest hatred
>>
>> >> >by Jeff Jacoby
>>
>> >> History's oldest reason for hatred: jew behaviour.
>> > And that Jew behaviour is standing for God-based morals and ethics.
>>
>> LOL! That jew behaviour KILLED your God, gook!
> God was incaranted as a Jewish resident of Galilee named Jesus. As
>Jesus, He stood for God-based morals and ethics- Jewish behaviour. One
>could argue that He was killed for that.
who killed your God, gook!
>> <mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
> The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.
sibling sodomy!
The Peeler
Apr 6, 2012, 3:16:40 PM4/6/12
to
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:35:38 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
farted:
<snip our resident psychopath's usual hysterical and psychotic garbage>
Bragging with your subnormality again, The Rectum? <BG>
Michael Ejercito
Apr 6, 2012, 8:58:06 PM4/6/12
to
On Apr 6, 11:35 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 6, 10:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:36:30 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > And that Jew behaviour is standing for God-based morals and ethics.
>
> >> LOL! That jew behaviour KILLED your God, gook!
> > God was incaranted as a Jewish resident of Galilee named Jesus. As
> >Jesus, He stood for God-based morals and ethics- Jewish behaviour. One
> >could argue that He was killed for that.
>
> LOL! One could also argue that you suck the rectums of the very jews
> who killed your God, gook!
The very Jews who killed my Lord have long since perished, nithing.
> >On Apr 6, 10:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:36:30 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > And that Jew behaviour is standing for God-based morals and ethics.
>
> >> LOL! That jew behaviour KILLED your God, gook!
> > God was incaranted as a Jewish resident of Galilee named Jesus. As
> >Jesus, He stood for God-based morals and ethics- Jewish behaviour. One
> >could argue that He was killed for that.
>
> LOL! One could also argue that you suck the rectums of the very jews
> who killed your God, gook!
>
> >> <mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
> > The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.
>
> Sucking jew rectums is YOUR sexual disorientation, gook. That, and
> sibling sodomy!
The following ballad was dedicated to you.
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.women/msg/129e843df7563df9
THE BALLAD OF THE REVD {A Tale of a Homosexual}
Oh, the Revd is a funny sort of fellow,
When he’s sucking dick he’s kind of mellow.
Yes, the Revd is a homo and a queer,
And he drinks urine with his beer.
The Revd jacks his dick in broad daylight,
And with men he has no might.
He’s a pervert a deviate and a goy,
And his penis is his favorite toy.
Oh the Revd is a Satanist and a sodomite,
And on his carcass the flies will light.
Oh the Revd’s little peter is very small,
And he smells like a horse’s stall.
{MOVE UP ONE OCTAVE HERE IN THE SONG}
Oh, the Revd is a funny sort of fellow,
When he’s sucking dick he’s kind of mellow.
Like a Muslim he shits in the street,
Then proceeds to jack his meat.
Oh the Revd is a natural born terrorist thing,
And the ladies all laugh at his little ding.
He was fucked in his ass by a bull queer,
And of all good people he does fear.
Because the hackers want to kill him dead,
Because he’s AIDS infected and shits in his bed.
The Revd is a stupid so na fa bitch,
And he has that homosexual twitch.
{MOVE UP ONE MORE OCTAVE HERE IN THE SONG FOR THE FINAL STANZA}
Oh, the Revd is a funny sort of fellow,
When he’s sucking dick he’s kind of mellow.
Well the Revd picks his nose and eats the snot,
And he is descended from a whore that was hot.
He’s related to the murderer Cain,
And in his asshole there will always be pain.
He’s dying of a terrible disease,
And it is the Muslims he wants to appease.
He’s blasphemed the G-d of Israel,
And his body will always have a stink and smell.
We will all sing to G-d real loud,
When the Revd is dead we’ll be proud!
The Revd
Apr 7, 2012, 6:33:37 AM4/7/12
to
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 6, 11:35 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 6, 10:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:36:30 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > And that Jew behaviour is standing for God-based morals and ethics.
>>
>> >> LOL! That jew behaviour KILLED your God, gook!
>> > God was incaranted as a Jewish resident of Galilee named Jesus. As
>> >Jesus, He stood for God-based morals and ethics- Jewish behaviour. One
>> >could argue that He was killed for that.
>>
>> LOL! One could also argue that you suck the rectums of the very jews
>> who killed your God, gook!
> The very Jews who killed my Lord have long since perished, nithing.
"His blood be upon us and upon our children."
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 6, 11:35 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 6, 10:08 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:36:30 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > And that Jew behaviour is standing for God-based morals and ethics.
>>
>> >> LOL! That jew behaviour KILLED your God, gook!
>> > God was incaranted as a Jewish resident of Galilee named Jesus. As
>> >Jesus, He stood for God-based morals and ethics- Jewish behaviour. One
>> >could argue that He was killed for that.
>>
>> LOL! One could also argue that you suck the rectums of the very jews
>> who killed your God, gook!
> The very Jews who killed my Lord have long since perished, nithing.
- jew, 1st century AD
>>
>> >> <mindlesser [sic] gook repetition b'rissed>
>> > The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.
>>
>> Sucking jew rectums is YOUR sexual disorientation, gook. That, and
>> sibling sodomy!
> I suck no rectums nor sodomise any siblings, boy.
>The following ballad was dedicated to you.
The Peeler
Apr 7, 2012, 6:51:45 AM4/7/12
to
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 06:33:37 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
Completely NONEXISTENT, as ALWAYS? LMAO!
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
<snip our resident psychopath's usual hysterical and psychotic garbage>
Poor hysterical nutter! How's life outside Usenet, you housebound cripple?
farted:
<snip our resident psychopath's usual hysterical and psychotic garbage>
Completely NONEXISTENT, as ALWAYS? LMAO!
Michael Ejercito
Apr 7, 2012, 11:37:28 AM4/7/12
to
On Apr 7, 3:33 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >The following ballad was dedicated to you.
>
> That's even mindlesser [sic] than your usual plagiarism, gook!
That ballad described you perfectly, boy.
Michael
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 6, 11:35 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.
>
> >> Sucking jew rectums is YOUR sexual disorientation, gook. That, and
> >> sibling sodomy!
> > I suck no rectums nor sodomise any siblings, boy.
>
> You do both, gook.
I do neither, nithing.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 6, 11:35 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.
>
> >> Sucking jew rectums is YOUR sexual disorientation, gook. That, and
> >> sibling sodomy!
> > I suck no rectums nor sodomise any siblings, boy.
>
> You do both, gook.
>
> >The following ballad was dedicated to you.
>
> That's even mindlesser [sic] than your usual plagiarism, gook!
Michael
The Revd
Apr 7, 2012, 12:34:16 PM4/7/12
to
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 08:37:28 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 7, 3:33 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 6, 11:35 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.
>>
>> >> Sucking jew rectums is YOUR sexual disorientation, gook. That, and
>> >> sibling sodomy!
>> > I suck no rectums nor sodomise any siblings, boy.
>>
>> You do both, gook.
> I do neither, nithing.
You do BOTH, gook.
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 7, 3:33 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 6, 11:35 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.
>>
>> >> Sucking jew rectums is YOUR sexual disorientation, gook. That, and
>> >> sibling sodomy!
>> > I suck no rectums nor sodomise any siblings, boy.
>>
>> You do both, gook.
> I do neither, nithing.
>>
>> >The following ballad was dedicated to you.
>>
>> That's even mindlesser [sic] than your usual plagiarism, gook!
> That ballad described you perfectly, boy.
What the fuck is wrong with you, gook?
The Peeler
Apr 7, 2012, 12:35:53 PM4/7/12
to
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 12:34:16 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
garbage>
...and nothing's left, again! LOL
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
<snip all of our resident psychopath's usual hysterical and psychotic
farted:
garbage>
...and nothing's left, again! LOL
Michael Ejercito
Apr 7, 2012, 6:22:14 PM4/7/12
to
On Apr 7, 9:34 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 08:37:28 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 7, 3:33 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I suck no rectums nor sodomise any siblings, boy.
>
> >> You do both, gook.
> > I do neither, nithing.
>
> You do BOTH, gook.
I do NEITHER, boy.
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 08:37:28 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 7, 3:33 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I suck no rectums nor sodomise any siblings, boy.
>
> >> You do both, gook.
> > I do neither, nithing.
>
> You do BOTH, gook.
>
>
>
> >> >The following ballad was dedicated to you.
>
> >> That's even mindlesser [sic] than your usual plagiarism, gook!
> > That ballad described you perfectly, boy.
>
> Ballad? You call that braindead nigger's rant a ballad???
> What the fuck is wrong with you, gook?
wrong with you, nithing?
Michael
The Revd
Apr 8, 2012, 6:24:28 AM4/8/12
to
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 15:22:14 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 7, 9:34 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 08:37:28 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 7, 3:33 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > I suck no rectums nor sodomise any siblings, boy.
>>
>> >> You do both, gook.
>> > I do neither, nithing.
>>
>> You do BOTH, gook.
> I do NEITHER, boy.
You do BOTH gook. Especially Bill Levinstein's fat jew rectum.
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Apr 7, 9:34 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 08:37:28 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 7, 3:33 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:58:06 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > I suck no rectums nor sodomise any siblings, boy.
>>
>> >> You do both, gook.
>> > I do neither, nithing.
>>
>> You do BOTH, gook.
> I do NEITHER, boy.
>>
>>
>>
>> >> >The following ballad was dedicated to you.
>>
>> >> That's even mindlesser [sic] than your usual plagiarism, gook!
>> > That ballad described you perfectly, boy.
>>
>> Ballad? You call that braindead nigger's rant a ballad???
>> What the fuck is wrong with you, gook?
> "Nigger"? You call NefeshBarYochai a "nigger"? What the fuck is
>wrong with you, nithing?
The Peeler
Apr 8, 2012, 6:31:21 AM4/8/12
to
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 06:24:28 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
No cure available for your sort of mental and emotional handicaps, you
ridiculous idiotic and psychotic swine? LOL
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
<snip our resident psychopath's usual hysterical and psychotic garbage>
farted:
No cure available for your sort of mental and emotional handicaps, you
ridiculous idiotic and psychotic swine? LOL
0 new messages