NEWSFLASH
David C Jones
Ireland just bought 10,000 septic tanks. As soon as they learn how to drive
em, they're gonna invade Iraq! Incidentally, do you know how stop the Irish
army on horseback? -
Stop the carousel.
Where's your sense of humour.
michael adams
"David C Jones" <david....@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:b%esa.1159$Yc2...@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...
> Sorry guys could not resist this
...
No of course you couldn't, because you're an idiot
And next time why not type the whole post in caps as well.
It looks so much more impressive.
michael adams
...
David C Jones
till you find it again idiot
"michael adams" <mjad...@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:3eb1...@212.67.96.135...
David C Jones
michael adams
> well you must be one as well Mickey as you read it LOL
...
The only reason I read your post in the first place was to confirm
my suspicion that the only people who start threads with titles
comprised mainly of capital letters are lunatics, and top-posting
idiots such as yourself.
It's truly sad isn't it, that you should place that "LOL" there at
the end of your top posted comment? Given that you're the only person
in the whole world who's ever going to find such a comment even remotely
amusing. And yet at the same time, you're about the only person in the
world who isn't already aware of that fact.
You my friend, are about as funny as an open grave on a cold
monday morning in the rain.
So may I humbly suggest you stick to something you're good at?
Which on present evidence, would seem to be limited to banging
rocks together in the middle of a field.
michael adams
...
David C Jones
>
> "David C Jones" <david....@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:XfAsa.1922$Yc2...@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...
>
> > well you must be one as well Mickey as you read it LOL
>
> ...
>
> The only reason I read your post in the first place was to confirm
> my suspicion that the only people who start threads with titles
> comprised mainly of capital letters are lunatics, and top-posting
> idiots such as yourself.
But mickey I luv top posting, it winds people oops sorry dickheads like you
up
>
> It's truly sad isn't it, that you should place that "LOL" there at
> the end of your top posted comment? Given that you're the only person
> in the whole world who's ever going to find such a comment even remotely
> amusing. And yet at the same time, you're about the only person in the
> world who isn't already aware of that fact.
But mickey I got this from an Irish website, so there must be people who are
amused, dick
>
> You my friend, are about as funny as an open grave on a cold
> monday morning in the rain.
I find that very funny mickey
>
> So may I humbly suggest you stick to something you're good at?
> Which on present evidence, would seem to be limited to banging
> rocks together in the middle of a field.
Would love to do that mickey, especially with your head in the middle of
them, now that would be fascinating, can we meet?>
>
>
>
> michael adams
>
>
> ...
>
>
Harry Merrick
Well, "I" thought that it was very funny! So, it does not surprise me that
certain main excusers for the activities of the Republican Movement and their
private army do not see anything funny in it. We have always known that
Republicans generally and some in particular have absolutely NO sense of humour
and cannot laugh even occasionally against themselves! They take themselves far
too seriously! - It is a sign of severe lack of self confidence and a depressed
nature. No wonder that we do not anticipate with much pleasure the possible
prospect of joining with such grey unpleasant characters in the future!
It is worth recording that perhaps the most talented of all Irishmen, the
Kerryman, gets lampooned and laughed at mercilessly. They seem to enjoy it.
Most Kerrymen can buy and sell the rest of us easily. :-))
Harry Merrick.
Harry Merrick.
michael adams
"Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3EB538D6...@agencies.dnet.co.uk...
>
> Well, "I" thought that it was very funny!
...
Of course you would because you're another half-wit just like
your good friend Mr Jones. Did you know he was a porn baron by
the way?
He's been running run a porn website pyramid marketing scheme for
around two years now. You can read all about it on here.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?G55642074
As you've got so much in common, he might even let you have
special terms. According to him, you could soon be earning
over £10,000 a month. Which means in no time at all, you might even
be able to give up your road sweepers job.
...
> So, it does not surprise me that
> certain main excusers for the activities of the Republican Movement and
their
> private army do not see anything funny in it.
...
"Excusers" Harry? If you try and look the word up in your Readers
Digest Dictionary, I don't think you'll find it in there. As there's
no such word.
Just to be sure you can confirm this with an online Dictionary
http://www.bartleby.com/cgi-bin/texis/webinator/ahdsearch?search_type=enty&q
uery=excuser&db=ahd&Submit=Search
Possibly the word you're looking for here is maybe "sympathiser"
or possibly "supporter".
Try and learn your words Harry. A person of your age shouldn't
be making silly mistakes like this. Now should you?
...
> We have always known that
> Republicans generally and some in particular have absolutely NO sense of
humour
> and cannot laugh even occasionally against themselves! They take
themselves far
> too seriously! -
...
Quite why you should suppose I'm a Republican supporter heaven only
knows. Except of course, that given your obvious limitations, you clearly
find it easier to cope if you can readily categorise people. Makes things
rather less complicated for you I suppose
I've always believed that political separation from Britain, more
especially the British Treasury and British Tariff controls re: the
rest of the world would have been been of the greatest economic benefit
to the island as a whole. And I'm not alone in that. Swift - an Englishmen
who just happened to be born in Ireland proclaimed as much in his writings
on behalf of the Irish Woolen manufactures in the 18th century.
Its just unfortunate that Craig the first of your supposed leaders instead
threatened armed insurrection, treason and mutiny if the British Government
didn't cave in to his blackmail. Thus allowing his Unionist constituency
i.e the likes of you, to sponge off the British taxpayer i.e the likes of
me,
ever since. Money which would have been of far greater benefit to the
island as a whole. And then spongers and parasites like yourself and your
leader
Trimble and your late unlamented fellow-traveler in Donegal, have the brass
neck to point the finger at the economic performance of the Irish Republic!
Clearly being the deep thinker you are Harry, the very possibility that
British taxpayers may be getting rather tired of subsidising your antics,
your Ulster Workers Strikes etc, simply hadn't even occurred to you, had it?
Having to waste millions of pounds worth of British Taxpayers money on the
Army, the Police, the Inquiries the rebuilding etc. And all because of the
arrogant blinkered politicians voted into power by arrogant blinkered
buffoons such as yourself. People who can't even be trusted to run a tiny
little country of only 1 and a half million people without it all descending
into mayhem and chaos. Pathetic really Harry, isn't it? You couldn't really
have made a bigger cock-up of the whole thing if you'd tried!
Quite why the British Government, on behalf of the British taxpayer
didn't pull the plug on the likes of you and you arrogant strutting
little ways years ago, heaven only knows. Because if the vote was put to
the people who actually matter in all of this, the people who have
been having to foot the bill for your arrogance, incompetence and
mismanagement over the past 80 years, the British Taxpayer - you know
as well I do you'd be given no choice in the matter. You'd be joining
the Republic tomorrow. Like it or lump it!
...
> It is a sign of severe lack of self confidence and a depressed
> nature. No wonder that we do not anticipate with much pleasure the
possible
> prospect of joining with such grey unpleasant characters in the future!
...
That gives you two real options really then doesn't it Harry?
Either book your tickets for the ferry right now, to avoid the rush.
Or top yourself.
michael adams
...
Harry Merrick
> "Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3EB538D6...@agencies.dnet.co.uk...
> >
> > Well, "I" thought that it was very funny!
>
> ...
............"SNIP" Of Childish Drivel..........
ROTFL!!
Well, I certainly rattled *your* cage!! But, you see, all you have done is to
underline and prove exactly what I said. You are a sad humourless git! Get a
life!
As for Jones and his porn sites, obviously you yourself have been seriously
interested to have bothered to look them up. Are they illegal by the way? I
suppose not, provided they are adult.
And my spelling? I have never claimed to be perfect in that respect. Oh, and how
very petty minded of you to hold the detail in your database that I do have a
Readers Digest Universal Dictionary!! - Must be three months or more when I said
that. You obviously have very little else to do but snipe at your friendly
readers! Like Beacon and Nik O'Kiwi or Aemon as he is better known, you must be
unemployed, retired, or in prison, to spend so much time on the net!
I suppose that truthfully I should be flattered that you take the trouble to
keep information about myself, but Hell, so what? Great people always amused the
peasants!
Harry Merrick.
michael adams
> michael adams wrote:
>
> > "Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:3EB538D6...@agencies.dnet.co.uk...
> > >
> > > Well, "I" thought that it was very funny!
> >
> > ...
>
> ............"SNIP" Of Childish Drivel..........
>
> ROTFL!!
>
> Well, I certainly rattled *your* cage!! But, you see, all you have done is
to
> underline and prove exactly what I said.
> You are a sad humourless git!
...
Oh dear! Language Harry!
Who exactly has rattled who's cage here, I wonder?
...
> Get a life!
>
> As for Jones and his porn sites, obviously you yourself have been
seriously
> interested to have bothered to look them up. Are they illegal by the way?
I
> suppose not, provided they are adult.
...
No its simply that Mr Jones is obviously pretending to be something he
isn't. Furthermore, in essence his scheme is an attempt to defraud people.
As are all such schemes.
...
>
> And my spelling? I have never claimed to be perfect in that respect.
...
No Harry not your spelling. You tried to use a word that simply doesn't
exist. As it happens "apologists" would have been a better substitute
than those I suggested.
...
> Oh, and how
> very petty minded of you to hold the detail in your database that I do
have a
> Readers Digest Universal Dictionary!! - Must be three months or more when
I said
> that.
...
No Harry there's nothing sinister in that at all. Its simply that when you
made a point of mentioning your Readers' Digest Dictionary that was a
very PPP thing for you to have done. Just as with your Italian Classes.
Not that I categorise anyone of course. But much more PPP than most
of your other efforts on this Ng.
...
> You obviously have very little else to do but snipe at your friendly
> readers! Like Beacon and Nik O'Kiwi or Aemon as he is better known, you
must be
> unemployed, retired, or in prison, to spend so much time on the net!
...
But by the same token Harry you too must be unemployed, retired, or in
prison, to spend so much time responding to all their posts!
As it happens for the benefit of anyone who has their own website
who can code html - if you stick this line in the header at the top
of your page -
<META http-equiv="Page-Enter"
CONTENT="RevealTrans(Duration=3,Transition=12)">
your pages will fade in slowly.
This is what I'm actually supposed to be doing today Harry instead of
replying to your nonsense. In order to earn the money to pay the taxes
to subsisdise you and your kind in the style to which you've become
accustomed! And I do notice you didn't reply to any of the substantive
points in my post. A bit too close to the bone were they?
...
> I suppose that truthfully I should be flattered that you take the trouble
to
> keep information about myself, but Hell, so what? Great people always
amused the
> peasants!
...
And the better off used to amuse themselves by visiting lunatic asylums!
michael adams
...
David C Jones
out of mugs like you no more in existence.
"michael adams" <mjad...@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:3eb5...@212.67.96.135...
David C Jones
No not illegal Harry, but not inexistence anymore, but were there to make a
little cash, and believe me it was little from idiots like mickey boy.
>
> ...
>
> No its simply that Mr Jones is obviously pretending to be something he
> isn't. Furthermore, in essence his scheme is an attempt to defraud people.
>
> >
> > And my spelling? I have never claimed to be perfect in that respect.
>
> ...
>
> No Harry not your spelling. You tried to use a word that simply doesn't
> exist. As it happens "apologists" would have been a better substitute
> than those I suggested.
>
> ...
>
> > Oh, and how
> > very petty minded of you to hold the detail in your database that I do
> have a
> > Readers Digest Universal Dictionary!! - Must be three months or more
when
> I said
> > that.
Has he signed the data protection act ?
WELL PRAY TELL US MICKEY BOY WHY THE FCUK DO YOU COME HERE AND SNIPE AT
EVERYBODY................Yes I know i was being a bit loud
> ...
>
> > I suppose that truthfully I should be flattered that you take the
trouble
> to
> > keep information about myself, but Hell, so what? Great people always
> amused the
> > peasants!
>
> ...
>
>
> And the better off used to amuse themselves by visiting lunatic asylums!
And where are you then mickey boy, what asylum are you in.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> michael adams
>
>
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
Harry Merrick
> "Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3EB5570D...@agencies.dnet.co.uk...
> > michael adams wrote:
> >
> > > "Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > news:3EB538D6...@agencies.dnet.co.uk...
> > > >
> > > > Well, "I" thought that it was very funny!
> > >
> > > ...
> >
> > ............"SNIP" Of Childish Drivel..........
> >
> > ROTFL!!
> >
> > Well, I certainly rattled *your* cage!! But, you see, all you have done is
> to
> > underline and prove exactly what I said.
>
> > You are a sad humourless git!
>
> ...
>
> Oh dear! Language Harry!
Nothing very strong about that!!
>
>
> Who exactly has rattled who's cage here, I wonder?
It was you who reacted, not me.
>
>
> ...
>
> > Get a life!
> >
> > As for Jones and his porn sites, obviously you yourself have been
> seriously
> > interested to have bothered to look them up. Are they illegal by the way?
> I
> > suppose not, provided they are adult.
>
> ...
>
> No its simply that Mr Jones is obviously pretending to be something he
> isn't.
You obviously know something I don't know. What is he pretending to be?
> Furthermore, in essence his scheme is an attempt to defraud people.
> As are all such schemes.
Well, if he does indeed run a Porno Web Page, surely, one gets what one pays for
in these sorts of things. IMO, if you have to pay for sex of any sort, you are
sadly lacking.
>
>
> ...
>
> >
> > And my spelling? I have never claimed to be perfect in that respect.
>
> ...
>
> No Harry not your spelling.
You did say spelling.
> You tried to use a word that simply doesn't
> exist.
What word?
> As it happens "apologists" would have been a better substitute
> than those I suggested.
I often use that word.
>
>
> ...
>
> > Oh, and how
> > very petty minded of you to hold the detail in your database that I do
> have a
> > Readers Digest Universal Dictionary!! - Must be three months or more when
> I said
> > that.
>
> ...
>
> No Harry there's nothing sinister in that at all. Its simply that when you
> made a point of mentioning your Readers' Digest Dictionary that was a
> very PPP thing for you to have done.
If I remember correctly, I was responding to Beacon who asked the question.
> Just as with your Italian Classes.
And so? I now speak Italian so don't go any more. So what? I fail to see your
point here.
>
> Not that I categorise anyone of course. But much more PPP than most
> of your other efforts on this Ng.
PPP?
>
>
> ...
>
> > You obviously have very little else to do but snipe at your friendly
> > readers! Like Beacon and Nik O'Kiwi or Aemon as he is better known, you
> must be
> > unemployed, retired, or in prison, to spend so much time on the net!
>
> ...
>
> But by the same token Harry you too must be unemployed, retired, or in
> prison, to spend so much time responding to all their posts!
I don't think so. I only respond to the more outrageous ones, and leave the
rest.
>
>
> As it happens for the benefit of anyone who has their own website
> who can code html - if you stick this line in the header at the top
> of your page -
>
> <META http-equiv="Page-Enter"
> CONTENT="RevealTrans(Duration=3,Transition=12)">
>
> your pages will fade in slowly.
Really? Seems a bit pointless.
>
>
> This is what I'm actually supposed to be doing today Harry instead of
> replying to your nonsense.
Then don't.
> In order to earn the money to pay the taxes
> to subsisdise you and your kind in the style to which you've become
> accustomed!
ME!! - I earn a sufficiency to keep myself and my family in plenty of style. To
which I have "always" been accustomed!
> And I do notice you didn't reply to any of the substantive
> points in my post. A bit too close to the bone were they?
No, not in the least. It seems pointless to respond to bitchy, sneering and
childish comment, knowing full well the standard of response one would get.
>
>
> ...
>
> > I suppose that truthfully I should be flattered that you take the trouble
> to
> > keep information about myself, but Hell, so what? Great people always
> amused the
> > peasants!
>
> ...
>
> And the better off used to amuse themselves by visiting lunatic asylums!
>
Oh really? Did you see some of them there?
Harry Merrick.
michael adams
> michael adams wrote:
>
> >
> > No its simply that Mr Jones is obviously pretending to be something he
> > isn't.
>
> You obviously know something I don't know. What is he pretending to be?
...
Somebody who can be trusted. If you're interested, not just trolling,
and have the time, read my other posts about his schemes.
...
>
> > Furthermore, in essence his scheme is an attempt to defraud people.
> > As are all such schemes.
>
> Well, if he does indeed run a Porno Web Page, surely, one gets what one
pays for
> in these sorts of things. IMO, if you have to pay for sex of any sort, you
are
> sadly lacking.
>
...
He doesn't, Harry. That's the point. He promsises people £10,000 a month
when they run one, so why doesn't he run them all himself?
Think about it.
...
> > >
> > > And my spelling? I have never claimed to be perfect in that respect.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > No Harry not your spelling.
>
> You did say spelling.
...
No I didn't!
...
>
> > You tried to use a word that simply doesn't
> > exist.
>
> What word?
...
Excusers! That word!
...
Proud Protestant People Harry. Into learning things and always seeking to
improve themselves. I must admit the idea of you speaking Italian Harry..
...who do you most resemble Harry Paisley or Trimble?..I'm just trying to
picture it in my mind.
...
> > ...
> >
> > But by the same token Harry you too must be unemployed, retired, or in
> > prison, to spend so much time responding to all their posts!
>
> I don't think so. I only respond to the more outrageous ones, and leave
the
> rest.
...
Can't argue with that I suppose.
...
>
> >
> >
> > As it happens for the benefit of anyone who has their own website
> > who can code html - if you stick this line in the header at the top
> > of your page -
> >
> > <META http-equiv="Page-Enter"
> > CONTENT="RevealTrans(Duration=3,Transition=12)">
> >
> > your pages will fade in slowly.
>
> Really? Seems a bit pointless.
...
No. When you're making up a page with pictures you can't control which
pictures get loaded first. Ones down the bottom can load first
and the user's left looking at an empty screen or with things moving
about. If you fade the screen in, they can see something appearing almost
at once. Which can be an improvement.
Well, you did ask.
michael adams
...
Harry Merrick
> "Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3EB69BD6...@agencies.dnet.co.uk...
> > michael adams wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > No its simply that Mr Jones is obviously pretending to be something he
> > > isn't.
> >
> > You obviously know something I don't know. What is he pretending to be?
>
> ...
>
> Somebody who can be trusted. If you're interested, not just trolling,
You cannot tell that he cannot be trusted just because he may be selling methods
of running a successful Porn Web Page!! Come on! What about Mary Magdalene? -
The Chief Disciple over all the Disciples?
>
> and have the time, read my other posts about his schemes.
Well, I looked at some, in a vague sort of way.
>
>
> ...
>
> >
> > > Furthermore, in essence his scheme is an attempt to defraud people.
> > > As are all such schemes.
> >
> > Well, if he does indeed run a Porno Web Page, surely, one gets what one
> pays for
> > in these sorts of things. IMO, if you have to pay for sex of any sort, you
> are
> > sadly lacking.
> >
> ...
>
> He doesn't, Harry. That's the point. He promsises people £10,000 a month
> when they run one, so why doesn't he run them all himself?
I am reliably informed, that the only real way to make money on the Net IS
indeed to run a Porn site! - Have you ever wasted your time looking? What about
your spam mail? Everyday, fifty, sixty or so spams, many of them porn! A bloody
nuisance too. Even McAfee's Spam Killer finds it hard to cope! However, the fact
remains, there are literally thousands of these sites on the Web. £10,000/month
does not seem OTT to me in those circumstances. Oh, and who says that he is NOT
running a Pornographic site? He may well be for all we know, but he certainly
would not admit to that one!
>
>
> Think about it.
>
I just did!
>
> ...
> > > >
> > > > And my spelling? I have never claimed to be perfect in that respect.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > No Harry not your spelling.
> >
> > You did say spelling.
>
> ...
>
> No I didn't!
We'll just have to disagree.
>
>
> ...
> >
> > > You tried to use a word that simply doesn't
> > > exist.
> >
> > What word?
>
> ...
>
> Excusers! That word!
Oh, really? Well, for your edification and education, there IS a word, "Excuser"
in the famous dictionary. "Excusers" is merely the plural form.
Oh. I certainly had not thought in those terms. However ............ !
> I must admit the idea of you speaking Italian Harry..
And what is wrong with that? I spend three weeks of the year on holiday in
Tuscany and Italian is a beautiful language to speak.
>
> ...who do you most resemble Harry Paisley or Trimble?..I'm just trying to
> picture it in my mind.
ROTFL!! For your information, I don't look like either of them. Do they speak
Italian? I didn't know .....
There is a mug shot of me in Pictures of Sci, somewhere, I am not too sure
where.
>
>
> ...
>
> > > ...
> > >
> > > But by the same token Harry you too must be unemployed, retired, or in
> > > prison, to spend so much time responding to all their posts!
> >
> > I don't think so. I only respond to the more outrageous ones, and leave
> the
> > rest.
>
> ...
>
> Can't argue with that I suppose.
I thought not.
>
>
> ...
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > As it happens for the benefit of anyone who has their own website
> > > who can code html - if you stick this line in the header at the top
> > > of your page -
> > >
> > > <META http-equiv="Page-Enter"
> > > CONTENT="RevealTrans(Duration=3,Transition=12)">
> > >
> > > your pages will fade in slowly.
> >
> > Really? Seems a bit pointless.
>
> ...
>
> No. When you're making up a page with pictures you can't control which
> pictures get loaded first. Ones down the bottom can load first
> and the user's left looking at an empty screen or with things moving
> about. If you fade the screen in, they can see something appearing almost
> at once. Which can be an improvement.
>
> Well, you did ask.
Yes I did, didn't I? - Interesting tho' what others get up to! Do you do this
for a newspaper?
Harry Merrick.
michael adams
> I am reliably informed, that the only real way to make money on the Net IS
> indeed to run a Porn site! - Have you ever wasted your time looking? What
about
> your spam mail? Everyday, fifty, sixty or so spams, many of them porn! A
bloody
> nuisance too. Even McAfee's Spam Killer finds it hard to cope! However,
the fact
> remains, there are literally thousands of these sites on the Web.
£10,000/month
> does not seem OTT to me in those circumstances. Oh, and who says that he
is NOT
> running a Pornographic site? He may well be for all we know, but he
certainly
> would not admit to that one!
...
Yes but Harry why not run them all himself or employ people to do it? If
he's got £10,000 a month coming in for each site, he could pay someone
£1000 a week to run each one and still pocket the remaining £6000 himself.
There's an old saying. Geese that lay golden eggs are simply never for sale.
Yes, there's been lots of articles about the profitability of porn
sites in the papers as being the "business model" for the net. But you
know Harry I often wonder about this, given the "iffy" nature of the whole
thing. I know some famous idiots have been caught out, but how many really
sensible people would ever give their credit card number to a porn site -
or anything they didn't want the wife to find out about? I've bought books
over the internet from Amazon with my credit card. With no problems.
But if there were you could clear it up. What's to stop the porn site
charging you £50 or £200 a month? Oh no Mr Smith you've definiitely signed
up a two years subscription to "Readers Wives Big Ones" or whatever? What
can you do? Write to Barclaycard and insist you only signed for two weeks
of "Readers Wives Big Ones" - take them to court ? I know it may not be
as blatant as this. But still? Or maybe there really are that many mugs
about.
...
> > ...
> > > > >
> > > > > And my spelling? I have never claimed to be perfect in that
respect.
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > No Harry not your spelling.
> > >
> > > You did say spelling.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > No I didn't!
>
> We'll just have to disagree.
>
> >
> >
> > ...
> > >
> > > > You tried to use a word that simply doesn't
> > > > exist.
> > >
> > > What word?
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Excusers! That word!
>
> Oh, really? Well, for your edification and education, there IS a word,
"Excuser"
> in the famous dictionary. "Excusers" is merely the plural form.
....
Here's a shortlink too the American Heritage Dictionary search for
"excuser" Harry. As you can see its not there. Only "excuse". Its not
in the Chambers 20th Century either as far as I can see. My eyesight's
not what it was, mainly from this, which is why I checked on the Web
as well. Although an English rather American dictionary would have been
preferable, there doesn't seem to be one on the web.
Its interesting that there doesn't seem to be such a word. As there's no
obvious reason why there shouldn't. In fact there should be when you think
of it. Anyway there isn't.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?Z21213574
...
> > >
> > > If I remember correctly, I was responding to Beacon who asked the
> > question.
> > >
> > > > Just as with your Italian Classes.
> > >
> > > And so? I now speak Italian so don't go any more. So what? I fail to
see
> > your
> > > point here.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Not that I categorise anyone of course. But much more PPP than most
> > > > of your other efforts on this Ng.
> > >
> > > PPP?
> > >
> > ...
> >
> > Proud Protestant People Harry. Into learning things and always seeking
to
> > improve themselves.
>
> Oh. I certainly had not thought in those terms. However ............ !
...
There's an author I read a lot of called Geoffrey Beattie. Or Professor
Geoffrey Beattie as he now is. He's from NI and writes very good wryly
humourous articles in the newsapers and also books. He wrote a book called
"We
are the People" should be in the local library if you're interested.
...
>
> > I must admit the idea of you speaking Italian Harry..
>
> And what is wrong with that? I spend three weeks of the year on holiday in
> Tuscany and Italian is a beautiful language to speak.
>
> >
> > ...who do you most resemble Harry Paisley or Trimble?..I'm just trying
to
> > picture it in my mind.
>
> ROTFL!! For your information, I don't look like either of them. Do they
speak
> Italian? I didn't know .....
...
Its somehow the two accents don't seem to mix. Same with a lot of accents
actually I suppose.
...
> There is a mug shot of me in Pictures of Sci, somewhere, I am not too sure
> where.
...
I had a quick look on Google. Eddie Wall had a page of pictures but
that's not there now it seems.
...
> > > >
> > > > But by the same token Harry you too must be unemployed, retired, or
in
> > > > prison, to spend so much time responding to all their posts!
> > >
> > > I don't think so. I only respond to the more outrageous ones, and
leave
> > the
> > > rest.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Can't argue with that I suppose.
>
> I thought not.
>
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> > If you fade the screen in, they can see something appearing almost
> > at once. Which can be an improvement.
> >
> > Well, you did ask.
>
> Yes I did, didn't I? - Interesting tho' what others get up to! Do you do
this
> for a newspaper?
>
...
If only!
No secondhand car dealers mainly.
michael adams
...
Nik O'Kiwi
Its your name...
Harshly accurate...
>> It is a sign of severe lack of self confidence and a depressed
>> nature. No wonder that we do not anticipate with much pleasure the
>possible prospect of joining with such grey unpleasant characters in the future!
>
>...
>
>That gives you two real options really then doesn't it Harry?
>
>Either book your tickets for the ferry right now, to avoid the rush.
>
>Or top yourself.
He could try to learn to live better with his Irish Catholic
neighbours...
Nik
michael adams
"Conor Booze O Brien" <conor...@hatemail.com> wrote in message
news:59tfbvcb71hb8r6f5...@4ax.com...
>
> >I had a quick look on Google. Eddie Wall had a page of pictures but
> >that's not there now it seems.
>
> still not able to use Google?
>
> And with all your practice too....
>
> http://tinyurl.com/b4fn
>
> http://www.wall.ie/scifaces/
...
Thanx.
Actually Harry looks quite Italian as it happens almost
straight out of the Sopranos! While everybody else is
surprisingly normal looking too. No speaking for the
ones who aren't on there of course. ahem
...
This is what I tried with no luck
From: Eddie Wall (edw...@indigo.ie)
Subject: Re: Your pictures
View this article only
Newsgroups: soc.culture.irish
Date: 1999/01/14
>
>Went to the SCI website and saw some of your pictures.A nice bunch
>of cute guys and some beautiful women and strangely baby pictures...
>I would love to send my picture someday.Where's the picture of
>Eddie though...I am curious.
>BREn(da)
WHAT>>!!!! You did not see me... and I put that new dress just for
the photo too.>>
Try http://www.wwa.com/~abardubh/people/eddie.html
Eddie
...
So there! I wasn't just making it up was I ?
Just put your answer in the box please
a) [ ] Yes you were b) [ ] I apologise. No you weren't
michael
...
Harry Merrick
>
> "Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3EB6B290...@agencies.dnet.co.uk...
>
>
> > I am reliably informed, that the only real way to make money on the Net
IS
> > indeed to run a Porn site! - Have you ever wasted your time looking?
What
> about
> > your spam mail? Everyday, fifty, sixty or so spams, many of them porn! A
> bloody
> > nuisance too. Even McAfee's Spam Killer finds it hard to cope! However,
> the fact
> > remains, there are literally thousands of these sites on the Web.
> £10,000/month
> > does not seem OTT to me in those circumstances. Oh, and who says that he
> is NOT
> > running a Pornographic site? He may well be for all we know, but he
> certainly
> > would not admit to that one!
>
> ...
>
> Yes but Harry why not run them all himself or employ people to do it? If
> he's got £10,000 a month coming in for each site, he could pay someone
> £1000 a week to run each one and still pocket the remaining £6000 himself.
>
> There's an old saying. Geese that lay golden eggs are simply never for
sale.
Well, not being Jones, how could simple littl Moi know! However, maybe it
never occurred to him!
>
> Yes, there's been lots of articles about the profitability of porn
> sites in the papers as being the "business model" for the net. But you
> know Harry I often wonder about this, given the "iffy" nature of the whole
> thing. I know some famous idiots have been caught out, but how many really
> sensible people would ever give their credit card number to a porn site -
> or anything they didn't want the wife to find out about?
Indeed! Couldn't agree more. However, this would surely be more applicable
to child pornography??
I've bought books
> over the internet from Amazon with my credit card. With no problems.
> But if there were you could clear it up. What's to stop the porn site
> charging you £50 or £200 a month? Oh no Mr Smith you've definiitely signed
> up a two years subscription to "Readers Wives Big Ones" or whatever? What
> can you do? Write to Barclaycard and insist you only signed for two weeks
> of "Readers Wives Big Ones" - take them to court ? I know it may not be
> as blatant as this. But still? Or maybe there really are that many mugs
> about.
Actually, I do believe that that scenario actually does happen! - The only
thing to do then is to cancel ones card and start over!! - I believe that
the banks will persue such fraud as far as they are able, despite the site
being a Porn site. Of course, one doesn't have to care if ones peccadilloes
are exposed on a national basis!
Well, it is most certainly in mine!! - You do have to accept that we are NOT
talking about the American language, which, like it or not, is not proper
English per se. I would suggest that you have a look at the Oxford English
Dictionary. Chambers is a pale alta ego!
>
> Its interesting that there doesn't seem to be such a word. As there's no
> obvious reason why there shouldn't. In fact there should be when you think
> of it. Anyway there isn't.
Of course there is! Not that it matters, but see above.
>
>
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?Z21213574
>
> ...
>
> > > >
> > > > If I remember correctly, I was responding to Beacon who asked the
> > > question.
> > > >
> > > > > Just as with your Italian Classes.
> > > >
> > > > And so? I now speak Italian so don't go any more. So what? I fail to
> see
> > > your
> > > > point here.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Not that I categorise anyone of course. But much more PPP than
most
> > > > > of your other efforts on this Ng.
> > > >
> > > > PPP?
> > > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Proud Protestant People Harry. Into learning things and always seeking
> to
> > > improve themselves.
> >
> > Oh. I certainly had not thought in those terms. However ............ !
>
> ...
>
> There's an author I read a lot of called Geoffrey Beattie. Or Professor
> Geoffrey Beattie as he now is. He's from NI and writes very good wryly
> humourous articles in the newsapers and also books. He wrote a book called
> "We
> are the People" should be in the local library if you're interested.
Yes, but if only I had the time! Try working for a giant corporation and you
will see what I mean!
>
> ...
>
> >
> > > I must admit the idea of you speaking Italian Harry..
> >
> > And what is wrong with that? I spend three weeks of the year on holiday
in
> > Tuscany and Italian is a beautiful language to speak.
> >
> > >
> > > ...who do you most resemble Harry Paisley or Trimble?..I'm just trying
> to
> > > picture it in my mind.
> >
> > ROTFL!! For your information, I don't look like either of them. Do they
> speak
> > Italian? I didn't know .....
>
> ...
>
> Its somehow the two accents don't seem to mix. Same with a lot of accents
> actually I suppose.
TUT! Who said that I spoke with an accent??? - Definately BBC!
>
> ...
>
> > There is a mug shot of me in Pictures of Sci, somewhere, I am not too
sure
> > where.
>
> ...
>
> I had a quick look on Google. Eddie Wall had a page of pictures but
> that's not there now it seems.
Google?
>
> ...
> > > > >
> > > > > But by the same token Harry you too must be unemployed, retired,
or
> in
> > > > > prison, to spend so much time responding to all their posts!
> > > >
> > > > I don't think so. I only respond to the more outrageous ones, and
> leave
> > > the
> > > > rest.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Can't argue with that I suppose.
> >
> > I thought not.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
>
> > > If you fade the screen in, they can see something appearing almost
> > > at once. Which can be an improvement.
> > >
> > > Well, you did ask.
> >
> > Yes I did, didn't I? - Interesting tho' what others get up to! Do you do
> this
> > for a newspaper?
> >
> ...
>
> If only!
>
> No secondhand car dealers mainly.
Goodness!!! Do excuse MEE!
Harry Merrick.
Harry Merrick
"Nik O'Kiwi" <repub...@email.com> wrote in message
news:qb7fbvk5uv3ij6kvc...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 4 May 2003 18:30:19 +0100, "michael adams"
> <mjad...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> >news:3EB538D6...@agencies.dnet.co.uk...
> >>
> >> Well, "I" thought that it was very funny!
> >
Well! Since I an supposed to be on Amoans' Kill File, I don't exist! - So,
neither does this post! ROTFL!
He talketh nonsense any way, so why bother.
Harry Merrick.
michael adams
>
>
> Well, not being Jones, how could simple littl Moi know! However, maybe it
> never occurred to him!
> >
> > Yes, there's been lots of articles about the profitability of porn
> > sites in the papers as being the "business model" for the net. But you
> > know Harry I often wonder about this, given the "iffy" nature of the
whole
> > thing. I know some famous idiots have been caught out, but how many
really
> > sensible people would ever give their credit card number to a porn
site -
> > or anything they didn't want the wife to find out about?
>
> Indeed! Couldn't agree more. However, this would surely be more applicable
> to child pornography
...
No surely not. And not just even porn either. Maybe you wouldnt really
want your wife to know just how much you paid for that last set of golf
clubs or whatever. Or the stuff you're regularly buying for the floozie.
Do you remember the fuss there was years ago, when Norman Lamont (from The
Orkneys IIRR) was British Chancellor of the Exchequer, and they found
out about his credit card bill from the off license? And made fun of the
fact that he only smoked really cheap cigars? Not exactly a national
disgrace,
but paying cash would have kept his name out of the papers. And maybe helped
him keep his job after the ERM fiasco.
...
> I've bought books
> > over the internet from Amazon with my credit card. With no problems.
> > But if there were you could clear it up. What's to stop the porn site
> > charging you £50 or £200 a month? Oh no Mr Smith you've definiitely
signed
> > up a two years subscription to "Readers Wives Big Ones" or whatever?
What
> > can you do? Write to Barclaycard and insist you only signed for two
weeks
> > of "Readers Wives Big Ones" - take them to court ? I know it may not be
> > as blatant as this. But still? Or maybe there really are that many mugs
> > about.
>
> Actually, I do believe that that scenario actually does happen! - The only
> thing to do then is to cancel ones card and start over!! - I believe that
> the banks will persue such fraud as far as they are able, despite the site
> being a Porn site. Of course, one doesn't have to care if ones
peccadilloes
> are exposed on a national basis!
> >
...
Maybe best not to mention it to the Bank at all. Just pay up and cancel
it. Because otherwise you're simply making yourself look like a fool
twice over. A fool for going on the thing at all, and a fool for getting
conned. They reckon that's how con men can get away with so much.
...
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > Excusers! That word!
> Well, it is most certainly in mine!! - You do have to accept that we are
> NOT
> talking about the American language, which, like it or not, is not proper
> English per se. I would suggest that you have a look at the Oxford English
> Dictionary. Chambers is a pale alta ego!
...
On Google theres links to the definition of "excuser" but all but
one are to a 1913 dictionary,. The modern one doesn't refer to any
actual dictionary. Out of curiosity if I remember I'll look it up in the
Full Oxford Dictionary when I'm next in the Library.
But is it in your Reader's Digest Dictionary Harry? Why the
sudden switch? An honest answer from you here please.
...
> > > > > PPP?
> > > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > Proud Protestant People Harry. Into learning things and always
seeking
> > to
> > > > improve themselves.
> > >
> > > Oh. I certainly had not thought in those terms. However ............ !
> >
> > ...
> >
> > There's an author I read a lot of called Geoffrey Beattie. Or Professor
> > Geoffrey Beattie as he now is. He's from NI and writes very good wryly
> > humourous articles in the newsapers and also books. He wrote a book
called
> > "We
> > are the People" should be in the local library if you're interested.
>
> Yes, but if only I had the time! Try working for a giant corporation and
you
...
I honestly imagined you drove a bread van Harry. Irwins or somesuch.
As you said you travelled about a bit.
...
> will see what I mean!
...
Actually after looking him up on the net, although he's to my taste
he can be a bit too patronising for some apparently. This is about the
book and him. What makes him so PPP still is the way despite being a
Professor now, he still makes a point of listing his educational achievments
at every opportunity. He has a really dry wit however, which maybe
doesn't come across in this review.
http://www.ulsternation.org.uk/we_are_the_people__geoffrey_beat.htm
...
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Its somehow the two accents don't seem to mix. Same with a lot of
accents
> > actually I suppose.
>
> TUT! Who said that I spoke with an accent??? - Definately BBC!
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > There is a mug shot of me in Pictures of Sci, somewhere, I am not too
> sure
> > > where.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I had a quick look on Google. Eddie Wall had a page of pictures but
> > that's not there now it seems.
>
> Google?
...
Our mutual friend Mr O'Brien pointed me in the right direction
eventually Harry. I must say you do look decidedly Italian - and with a
BBC accent as well! Things truly become more confusing by the minute!
Although I presume you now look rather older than you did in 1972.
...
> >
> > No secondhand car dealers mainly.
>
> Goodness!!! Do excuse MEE!
>
...
Only the classier "Arthur Daley" end of the market you understand
michael adams
...
Harry Merrick
>
>> > > > >
> > > > > Excusers! That word!
>
>
> > Well, it is most certainly in mine!! - You do have to accept that we are
> > NOT
> > talking about the American language, which, like it or not, is not
proper
> > English per se. I would suggest that you have a look at the Oxford
English
> > Dictionary. Chambers is a pale alta ego!
> ...
>
> On Google theres links to the definition of "excuser" but all but
> one are to a 1913 dictionary,. The modern one doesn't refer to any
> actual dictionary. Out of curiosity if I remember I'll look it up in the
> Full Oxford Dictionary when I'm next in the Library.
>
> But is it in your Reader's Digest Dictionary Harry? Why the
> sudden switch? An honest answer from you here please.
I was merely following on from what you said. No deliberate sudden switch! -
And yes, the singular "excuser" is indeed in the Reader's Digest Dictionary
as I already said!
>
> ...
>
> > > > > > PPP?
> > > > > >
> > > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Proud Protestant People Harry. Into learning things and always
> seeking
> > > to
> > > > > improve themselves.
> > > >
> > > > Oh. I certainly had not thought in those terms. However ............
!
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > There's an author I read a lot of called Geoffrey Beattie. Or
Professor
> > > Geoffrey Beattie as he now is. He's from NI and writes very good wryly
> > > humourous articles in the newsapers and also books. He wrote a book
> called
> > > "We
> > > are the People" should be in the local library if you're interested.
> >
> > Yes, but if only I had the time! Try working for a giant corporation and
> you
> ...
>
> I honestly imagined you drove a bread van Harry. Irwins or somesuch.
> As you said you travelled about a bit.
ROTFL!!! Irwins would hardly go the length and breadth of Ireland!! As for
driving a bread van, well why not? What is wrong with that? Bread Van
Drivers probably earn a lot more than me in any case!!
>
> ...
>
> > will see what I mean!
>
> ...
>
> Actually after looking him up on the net, although he's to my taste
> he can be a bit too patronising for some apparently. This is about the
> book and him. What makes him so PPP still is the way despite being a
> Professor now, he still makes a point of listing his educational
achievments
> at every opportunity. He has a really dry wit however, which maybe
> doesn't come across in this review.
>
> http://www.ulsternation.org.uk/we_are_the_people__geoffrey_beat.htm
Non losso che causa dire!
>
> ...
>
>
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Its somehow the two accents don't seem to mix. Same with a lot of
> accents
> > > actually I suppose.
> >
> > TUT! Who said that I spoke with an accent??? - Definately BBC!
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > There is a mug shot of me in Pictures of Sci, somewhere, I am not
too
> > sure
> > > > where.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > I had a quick look on Google. Eddie Wall had a page of pictures but
> > > that's not there now it seems.
> >
> > Google?
>
> ...
>
> Our mutual friend Mr O'Brien pointed me in the right direction
> eventually Harry. I must say you do look decidedly Italian
Really? - I hadn't thought so! More Irish I would have said. However, I am
flattered!
- and with a
> BBC accent as well! Things truly become more confusing by the minute!
I am always content to confuse!
>
> Although I presume you now look rather older than you did in 1972.
Obviously so, like us all. There is no answer yet to the ageing process!
>
> ...
>
> > >
> > > No secondhand car dealers mainly.
> >
> > Goodness!!! Do excuse MEE!
> >
> ...
>
> Only the classier "Arthur Daley" end of the market you understand
Oh, that's alright then!
Harry Merrick.
michael adams
>
> >
> > > Well, it is most certainly in mine!! - You do have to accept that we
are
> > > NOT
> > > talking about the American language, which, like it or not, is not
> proper
> > > English per se. I would suggest that you have a look at the Oxford
> English
> > > Dictionary. Chambers is a pale alta ego!
> > ...
> >
> > On Google theres links to the definition of "excuser" but all but
> > one are to a 1913 dictionary,. The modern one doesn't refer to any
> > actual dictionary. Out of curiosity if I remember I'll look it up in the
> > Full Oxford Dictionary when I'm next in the Library.
> >
> > But is it in your Reader's Digest Dictionary Harry? Why the
> > sudden switch? An honest answer from you here please.
>
> I was merely following on from what you said. No deliberate sudden
switch! -
> And yes, the singular "excuser" is indeed in the Reader's Digest
Dictionary
> as I already said!
...
You may have trolled me into visting the library here. But you'll only
find out if I'm right of course.
...
> > >
> > > Yes, but if only I had the time! Try working for a giant corporation
and
> > you
> > ...
> >
> > I honestly imagined you drove a bread van Harry. Irwins or somesuch.
> > As you said you travelled about a bit.
>
> ROTFL!!! Irwins would hardly go the length and breadth of Ireland!!
...
But they do make exceedingly good soda bread. And unlike some of the
other philistines sell it uncut. What is the world coming to?
Sliced soda bread ! No don't tell me Harry.
...
> As for
> driving a bread van, well why not? What is wrong with that? Bread Van
> Drivers probably earn a lot more than me in any case!!
...
Why do you assume I'm necessarily implying there's anything wrong with
somebody driving a bread van Harry? Good bread van drivers - who sweet
talk all their customers - as indeed you sweet talk everybody on here -
can indeed earn good money. So you're a coach driver then are you?
...
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > will see what I mean!
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Actually after looking him up on the net, although he's to my taste
> > he can be a bit too patronising for some apparently. This is about the
> > book and him. What makes him so PPP still is the way despite being a
> > Professor now, he still makes a point of listing his educational
> achievments
> > at every opportunity. He has a really dry wit however, which maybe
> > doesn't come across in this review.
> >
> > http://www.ulsternation.org.uk/we_are_the_people__geoffrey_beat.htm
>
> Non losso che causa dire!
> >
...
Show off! And you're not trolling me into finding out what that means.
Not at this hour of the night anyway.
...
> > > >
> > > > > There is a mug shot of me in Pictures of Sci, somewhere, I am not
> too
> > > sure
> > > > > where.
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > I had a quick look on Google. Eddie Wall had a page of pictures but
> > > > that's not there now it seems.
> > >
> > > Google?
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Our mutual friend Mr O'Brien pointed me in the right direction
> > eventually Harry. I must say you do look decidedly Italian
>
...
> Really? - I hadn't thought so! More Irish I would have said.
> However, I am flattered!
...
What do Irish people look like then? All the other people in the photos
look different and they're all Irish aren't they? Or at least I'd imagine
they'd claim to be. Is this a gotcha Harry?
...
>
> - and with a
> > BBC accent as well! Things truly become more confusing by the minute!
>
> I am always content to confuse!
> >
> > Although I presume you now look rather older than you did in 1972.
>
> Obviously so, like us all. There is no answer yet to the ageing process!
> >
...
Or to people adept at a neat sidestep.
michael
...
Nik O'Kiwi
<mjad...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
>"Nik O'Kiwi" <repub...@email.com> wrote in message
>news:qb7fbvk5uv3ij6kvc...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 4 May 2003 18:30:19 +0100, "michael adams"
>> <mjad...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Quite why you should suppose I'm a Republican supporter heaven only
>> >knows.
>>
>> Its your name...
>>
>>
>> >> It is a sign of severe lack of self confidence and a depressed
>> >> nature. No wonder that we do not anticipate with much pleasure the
>> >possible prospect of joining with such grey unpleasant characters in the
>future!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >That gives you two real options really then doesn't it Harry?
>> >
>> >Either book your tickets for the ferry right now, to avoid the rush.
>> >
>> >Or top yourself.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> He could try to learn to live better with his Irish Catholic
>> neighbours...
>
>Nik. All I can say is either -
>
>a) You're growing tired of trolling Budgie.
I'm honestly trying to engage our man Budgie in a debate. I'm not
trolling him.
>b) Your irony gene can only be from the Viking side of your anscestry.
If you say so...
>c) As I've sometimes suspected - remailers of no remailers -
Man....I'm using a New Zealand based ISP and going directly through
their newsservers. Have a look at the headers.
> you and Budgie are one and the same person.
Please don't lump me in with my enemy as being the same person.
> As you are uncannily alike in certain respects.
Which respects are those?
Nik
michael adams
> >> >That gives you two real options really then doesn't it Harry?
> >> >
> >> >Either book your tickets for the ferry right now, to avoid the rush.
> >> >
> >> >Or top yourself.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> He could try to learn to live better with his Irish Catholic
> >> neighbours...
> >
> >Nik. All I can say is either -
> >
> >a) You're growing tired of trolling Budgie.
>
> I'm honestly trying to engage our man Budgie in a debate. I'm not
> trolling him.
>
...
b) Your irony gene can only be from the Viking side of your anscestry.
...
> If you say so...
...
b) Your irony gene can only be from the Viking side of your anscestry.
...
>
> >c) As I've sometimes suspected - remailers of no remailers -
>
> Man....I'm using a New Zealand based ISP and going directly through
> their newsservers. Have a look at the headers.
...
That's not to say Budgie mightn't be rerouting from NZ too though is
it? That's the point Nik. Budgie showed an uncharacteristic and fleeting
interest in Rugby there a while back, when claiming to have been the
first to identify you, Nik, as being Aemon, WCB etc. He's never mentioned
Rugby since and he'd never up until then posted to a Rugby group. I
haven't checked since. Strange. Very strange.
I personally have long suspected that Budgie's craving for anonymity may
have nothing whatsoever to do with his need for personal security
and everything to do with his need to avoid embarrassment. I am quite
happy to accept though Nik that Budgie is indeed your creation. Rather
than the other way around.
...
>
> > you and Budgie are one and the same person.
>
> Please don't lump me in with my enemy as being the same person.
...
Some people need "enemies" as much as others need friends. So can
they really be "enemies" at all ?
...
>
> > As you are uncannily alike in certain respects.
>
> Which respects are those?
...
b) Your irony gene[s] can only be from the Viking side of your anscestry
michael
...
ITOUT @ntlworld.com Telmey®
posting this;
>On Tue, 6 May 2003 13:01:55 +0100, "michael adams"
><mjad...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Nik O'Kiwi" <repub...@email.com> wrote in message
>>news:qb7fbvk5uv3ij6kvc...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 4 May 2003 18:30:19 +0100, "michael adams"
>>> <mjad...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >Quite why you should suppose I'm a Republican supporter heaven only
>>> >knows.
>>>
>>> Its your name...
>>>
>>>
>>> >> It is a sign of severe lack of self confidence and a depressed
>>> >> nature. No wonder that we do not anticipate with much pleasure the
>>> >possible prospect of joining with such grey unpleasant characters in the
>>future!
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >That gives you two real options really then doesn't it Harry?
>>> >
>>> >Either book your tickets for the ferry right now, to avoid the rush.
>>> >
>>> >Or top yourself.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> He could try to learn to live better with his Irish Catholic
>>> neighbours...
>>
>>Nik. All I can say is either -
>>
>>a) You're growing tired of trolling Budgie.
>
>I'm honestly trying to engage our man Budgie in a debate. I'm not
>trolling him.
I believe you Nik, unlike your sidekick Mickey who does nothing but
Troll, you do as you do with me get into debate.
( my complaint about you is you repeat the nothingness but sure we
are getting over that :-) )
>>b) Your irony gene can only be from the Viking side of your anscestry.
>
>If you say so...
>
>>c) As I've sometimes suspected - remailers of no remailers -
>
>Man....I'm using a New Zealand based ISP and going directly through
>their newsservers. Have a look at the headers.
Yes Nik, but as some remailers will only show , say an USA addy
then anyone can be anyone
Harry Merrick
No, becuase it is most certainly in the Dictionary that I use. I am not in
the habit of telling lies!
>
> ...
>
> > > >
> > > > Yes, but if only I had the time! Try working for a giant corporation
> and
> > > you
> > > ...
> > >
> > > I honestly imagined you drove a bread van Harry. Irwins or somesuch.
> > > As you said you travelled about a bit.
> >
> > ROTFL!!! Irwins would hardly go the length and breadth of Ireland!!
>
> ...
>
> But they do make exceedingly good soda bread. And unlike some of the
> other philistines sell it uncut. What is the world coming to?
> Sliced soda bread ! No don't tell me Harry.
No, they don't, not yet!
>
> ...
>
> > As for
> > driving a bread van, well why not? What is wrong with that? Bread Van
> > Drivers probably earn a lot more than me in any case!!
>
> ...
>
> Why do you assume I'm necessarily implying there's anything wrong with
> somebody driving a bread van Harry? Good bread van drivers - who sweet
> talk all their customers - as indeed you sweet talk everybody on here -
> can indeed earn good money. So you're a coach driver then are you?
LOL! A very expensive company car driver actually!
>
> ...
>
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > will see what I mean!
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Actually after looking him up on the net, although he's to my taste
> > > he can be a bit too patronising for some apparently. This is about the
> > > book and him. What makes him so PPP still is the way despite being a
> > > Professor now, he still makes a point of listing his educational
> > achievments
> > > at every opportunity. He has a really dry wit however, which maybe
> > > doesn't come across in this review.
> > >
> > > http://www.ulsternation.org.uk/we_are_the_people__geoffrey_beat.htm
> >
> > Non losso che causa dire!
> > >
> ...
>
> Show off! And you're not trolling me into finding out what that means.
> Not at this hour of the night anyway.
:-))
>
> ...
> > > > >
> > > > > > There is a mug shot of me in Pictures of Sci, somewhere, I am
not
> > too
> > > > sure
> > > > > > where.
> > > > >
> > > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > > I had a quick look on Google. Eddie Wall had a page of pictures
but
> > > > > that's not there now it seems.
> > > >
> > > > Google?
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Our mutual friend Mr O'Brien pointed me in the right direction
> > > eventually Harry. I must say you do look decidedly Italian
> >
>
> ...
>
> > Really? - I hadn't thought so! More Irish I would have said.
> > However, I am flattered!
>
> ...
>
> What do Irish people look like then? All the other people in the photos
> look different and they're all Irish aren't they? Or at least I'd imagine
> they'd claim to be. Is this a gotcha Harry?
Not at all. I was wrong actually, because as a direct result of the sinking
of the Spanish Armada due to a storm off the Irish coast, many Irish people
have the mediterrainian look about them to this day. Of course, ther is no
such thing as a pure bred Irishman anyway. we are all blowins. After all, it
is suggested due to their accent, that the people of Cork were the Welsh who
learnt to swim!
>
> ...
>
>
> >
> > - and with a
> > > BBC accent as well! Things truly become more confusing by the minute!
> >
> > I am always content to confuse!
> > >
> > > Although I presume you now look rather older than you did in 1972.
> >
> > Obviously so, like us all. There is no answer yet to the ageing process!
> > >
> ...
>
> Or to people adept at a neat sidestep.
Nor that either!
Harry Merrick.
michael adams
> No, becuase it is most certainly in the Dictionary that I use. I am not in
> the habit of telling lies!
> >
______________________________________________________________
"Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3eb8...@news.boards.ie...
>
>
>You do have to excuse the Ulster
> accent! - Oh, by the way, he IS quite right of course!! :-))
>
> Harry Merrick
"Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3eb8...@news.boards.ie...
>
>
> TUT! Who said that I spoke with an accent??? - Definately BBC!
> >
> > ...
___________________________________________________________________
Sorry you were saying?
> >
> > But they do make exceedingly good soda bread. And unlike some of the
> > other philistines sell it uncut. What is the world coming to?
> > Sliced soda bread ! No don't tell me Harry.
>
> No, they don't, not yet!
...
No. What I was seeking to imply Harry, is that you are indeed the type
of person who would buy such an abomination as sliced soda-bread!
Irwins put molasses in it IIRR. A flavour it's imposible to
reproduce but also very fattening if taken to extremse.
...
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > As for
> > > driving a bread van, well why not? What is wrong with that? Bread Van
> > > Drivers probably earn a lot more than me in any case!!
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Why do you assume I'm necessarily implying there's anything wrong with
> > somebody driving a bread van Harry? Good bread van drivers - who sweet
> > talk all their customers - as indeed you sweet talk everybody on here -
> > can indeed earn good money. So you're a coach driver then are you?
>
> LOL! A very expensive company car driver actually!
> >
> > ...
I'm not wishing to be nosey - as wheedling information out of people
on Usenet can be seen as a bit of a game - but it's your own company car?
You're not a chauffeur then?
...
> > > > http://www.ulsternation.org.uk/we_are_the_people__geoffrey_beat.htm
> > >
> > > Non losso che causa dire!
> > > >
> > ...
> >
> > Show off! And you're not trolling me into finding out what that means.
> > Not at this hour of the night anyway.
>
> :-))
>
> >
> > > >
> > > > Our mutual friend Mr O'Brien pointed me in the right direction
> > > > eventually Harry. I must say you do look decidedly Italian
> > >
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > Really? - I hadn't thought so! More Irish I would have said.
> > > However, I am flattered!
> >
> > ...
> >
> > What do Irish people look like then? All the other people in the photos
> > look different and they're all Irish aren't they? Or at least I'd
imagine
> > they'd claim to be. Is this a gotcha Harry?
>
> Not at all. I was wrong actually, because as a direct result of the
sinking
> of the Spanish Armada due to a storm off the Irish coast, many Irish
people
> have the mediterrainian look about them to this day.
...
No need to tell me Harry. Exactly one half of one side of my family
split 50\50 two generations running. Around half of both the boys and girls
with black hair and dark eyes the other half brown hair and blue\grey eyes.
That was in Mayo. But it could be Moorish Blood as well, they reckon.
Just don't let Logan know.
...
> Of course, ther is no such thing as a pure bred Irishman anyway. we are
> all blowins. After all, it is suggested due to their accent, that the
> people of Cork were the Welsh who learnt to swim!
> >
> > ...
Or float!
michael adams
Nik Warrensson
He's just not as interested, in Rugby, as I am. It comes as no suprise
to me that he should like Rugby. I've tried to figure out about our
Falcon. He seems to me to either be a Cop, perhaps a Detective in a
Northern English city and an ex-BA Soldier perhaps an officer or one
or the other...or retired and hence he has the opportunity to argue
with Republicans, as he likes to do.
>I personally have long suspected that Budgie's craving for anonymity may
>have nothing whatsoever to do with his need for personal security
>and everything to do with his need to avoid embarrassment. I am quite
>happy to accept though Nik that Budgie is indeed your creation. Rather
>than the other way around.
I'm not that knowledgeable to go on about the exact details of the
transcripts of the Widegery and Saville enquiries as Falcon is.
That should tell you that we're not the same person.
Amusing idea though, that I should concoct such an adversarial and
knowledgeable opponent though.
You are either over-estimating me or trolling.
Either way, I find that amusing.
>> > you and Budgie are one and the same person.
>>
>> Please don't lump me in with my enemy as being the same person.
>
>...
>
>Some people need "enemies" as much as others need friends. So can
>they really be "enemies" at all ?
Oh definitely. A friend is someone you love, someone you desire the
best for, maybe to a minor degree, whereas an enemy is someone you
hate, .i.e. desire the worst for. So, in answer to your question, yes.
>> > As you are uncannily alike in certain respects.
>>
>> Which respects are those?
>
>...
>
>b) Your irony gene[s] can only be from the Viking side of your anscestry
:-)
Nik
michael adams
"Nik Warrensson" <warre...@yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
news:e3inbvkel2n8iffti...@4ax.com...
>
> He's just not as interested, in Rugby, as I am. It comes as no suprise
> to me that he should like Rugby. I've tried to figure out about our
> Falcon. He seems to me to either be a Cop, perhaps a Detective in a
> Northern English city and an ex-BA Soldier perhaps an officer or one
> or the other...or retired and hence he has the opportunity to argue
> with Republicans, as he likes to do.
...
Yeah but he got me in a right scrape over that. When I saw he'd made
that remark I had a look at the Rugby NG and while I couldn't find
any contributions from Budgie there were plenty from poor old
William C Clark. Who'd grammar flamed me in the middle of an argument
I was having with Beale and Budgie. I automatically assumed
Wiiliam C Clark *was* Budgie and so I really tore into him! This
happened a few times. I tacked an apology onto a reply somewhere.
Still if you *will* grammar flame strangers while they're in
the middle of converastions with other people, what can you expect?
Budgie certainly works funny hours at times. To be honest Nik when
you think of it Irish groups are a great place for trolling, for somebody
to wind up either Republicans or Loyalists. On most other politics
groups you can only troll people by being an outrageous right-winger
and so most genuine "liberal wimps " wouldn't stick around long enough
to make the game worthwhile. Whereas on here its different.
And for all his reading of Reports and so on, Budgie certainly
doesn't seem to have any real depth of backgound knowledge. i.e
he seems to be picking it up as he goes along. Whereas anyone who's
watched it unfold over the years has already got that knowledge
behind them to fall back on.
...
>
> >I personally have long suspected that Budgie's craving for anonymity may
> >have nothing whatsoever to do with his need for personal security
> >and everything to do with his need to avoid embarrassment. I am quite
> >happy to accept though Nik that Budgie is indeed your creation. Rather
> >than the other way around.
>
> I'm not that knowledgeable to go on about the exact details of the
> transcripts of the Widegery and Saville enquiries as Falcon is.
>
> That should tell you that we're not the same person.
...
Not necessarily. Because if you were the same person, in the guise
of one persona you would be interested in such things, while in the
other you wouldn't.
...
>
> Amusing idea though, that I should concoct such an adversarial and
> knowledgeable opponent though.
>
> You are either over-estimating me or trolling.
>
> Either way, I find that amusing.
...
Budgie doesn't! He finds it deeply annoying for some reason.
...
>
> >> > you and Budgie are one and the same person.
> >>
> >> Please don't lump me in with my enemy as being the same person.
> >
> >...
> >
> >Some people need "enemies" as much as others need friends. So can
> >they really be "enemies" at all ?
>
> Oh definitely. A friend is someone you love, someone you desire the
> best for, maybe to a minor degree, whereas an enemy is someone you
> hate, .i.e. desire the worst for. So, in answer to your question, yes.
...
That's not what I was getting at really. If you've ever known a couple
fight like cat and dog you might be surprised why they stick together
at all. But they need one another as much as any traditinal "happily
married couple" need each other. Enmity can be as great a bond as
love - people can maintain their identity as much through disgreeing
with people i.e like tearing into the Yanks on here grrrrrrrrr! hoot!
- as they can identifying with the people they like.
...
One other thing Nik, none of my business but: - justification based
on public support for punishment beatings etc - would those same people
be in favour of the re-introduction of Capital Punishment as well I wonder?
Makes me uncomfortable anyway. Leaders and followers Nik, leaders and
followers. Not that there's any easy answer I know, as policing of some
kind is clearly required. But it does make for terrible PR.
atb
michael
Whitewolf
wrote:
>On Thu, 8 May 2003 09:57:09 +0100, "michael adams"
><mjad...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Nik O'Kiwi" <repub...@email.com> wrote in message
>>news:v9mjbvotubu72gjn9...@4ax.com...
>>
Snip
>>I personally have long suspected that Budgie's craving for anonymity may
>>have nothing whatsoever to do with his need for personal security
>>and everything to do with his need to avoid embarrassment. I am quite
>>happy to accept though Nik that Budgie is indeed your creation. Rather
>>than the other way around.
>
>I'm not that knowledgeable to go on about the exact details of the
>transcripts of the Widegery and Saville enquiries as Falcon is.
>
>That should tell you that we're not the same person.
If I'm reading this right, and I think I am, it seems that Michael Adams is
accusing Nik of being Falcon.. Well FWIW, I know for a FACT that Falcon
and Nik are NOT the same person.
Regards,
Ray
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Around 55% of two thirds of Ulster says NO!" - Gav
Email: r...@eirefirst.com
Irish culture/interest site: http://www.eirefirst.com
King James Bible: http://www.iol.ie/~rayh/kjv
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
michael adams
"Whitewolf" <r...@eirefirst.com> wrote in message
news:thunbv89slq8h6l7l...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 May 2003 03:31:18 +1200, Nik Warrensson
<warre...@yahoo.co.nz>
> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 8 May 2003 09:57:09 +0100, "michael adams"
> ><mjad...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"Nik O'Kiwi" <repub...@email.com> wrote in message
> >>news:v9mjbvotubu72gjn9...@4ax.com...
> >>
> Snip
>
> >>I personally have long suspected that Budgie's craving for anonymity may
> >>have nothing whatsoever to do with his need for personal security
> >>and everything to do with his need to avoid embarrassment. I am quite
> >>happy to accept though Nik that Budgie is indeed your creation. Rather
> >>than the other way around.
> >
> >I'm not that knowledgeable to go on about the exact details of the
> >transcripts of the Widegery and Saville enquiries as Falcon is.
> >
> >That should tell you that we're not the same person.
>
> If I'm reading this right, and I think I am, it seems that Michael Adams
is
> accusing Nik of being Falcon.. Well FWIW, I know for a FACT that Falcon
> and Nik are NOT the same person.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ray
Falcon seems to be taking the news rather harder than Nik.
But nevertheless I must point out to you Ray, that the only way you
could really know for certain that Falcon and Nik are definitley
not the same person - given that Falcon takes such pains to hide
his real identity - is if you yourself are also either Nik or Falcon.
I don't quite know how you're going to take this news of your unmasking.
But there it is I'm afraid.
michael adams
the one and only:-)
Whitewolf
wrote:
I'm not going to give details, but I know that Falcon and Nik are completely
different people... And no, I'm not either of them.. just me...
Ray
Nik O'Kiwi
<mjad...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>"Nik Warrensson" <warre...@yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
>news:e3inbvkel2n8iffti...@4ax.com...
>>
>> He's just not as interested, in Rugby, as I am. It comes as no suprise
>> to me that he should like Rugby. I've tried to figure out about our
>> Falcon. He seems to me to either be a Cop, perhaps a Detective in a
>> Northern English city and an ex-BA Soldier perhaps an officer or one
>> or the other...or retired and hence he has the opportunity to argue
>> with Republicans, as he likes to do.
>
>...
>
>Yeah but he got me in a right scrape over that. When I saw he'd made
>that remark I had a look at the Rugby NG and while I couldn't find
>any contributions from Budgie there were plenty from poor old
>William C Clark. Who'd grammar flamed me in the middle of an argument
>I was having with Beale and Budgie. I automatically assumed
>Wiiliam C Clark *was* Budgie and so I really tore into him! This
>happened a few times. I tacked an apology onto a reply somewhere.
>Still if you *will* grammar flame strangers while they're in
>the middle of converastions with other people, what can you expect?
>
>Budgie certainly works funny hours at times. To be honest Nik when
>you think of it Irish groups are a great place for trolling,
Course they are. I still think Falcon is genuine though.
>for somebody to wind up either Republicans or Loyalists. On most other politics
>groups you can only troll people by being an outrageous right-winger
>and so most genuine "liberal wimps " wouldn't stick around long enough
>to make the game worthwhile. Whereas on here its different.
>
>And for all his reading of Reports and so on, Budgie certainly
>doesn't seem to have any real depth of backgound knowledge. i.e
>he seems to be picking it up as he goes along. Whereas anyone who's
>watched it unfold over the years has already got that knowledge
>behind them to fall back on.
I'm not convinced and he has been, after all, referring to transcripts
from a currently occuring inquest.
>...
>> >I personally have long suspected that Budgie's craving for anonymity may
>> >have nothing whatsoever to do with his need for personal security
>> >and everything to do with his need to avoid embarrassment.
I disagree.
>> > I am quite happy to accept though Nik that Budgie is indeed your creation. Rather
>> >than the other way around.
>>
>> I'm not that knowledgeable to go on about the exact details of the
>> transcripts of the Widegery and Saville enquiries as Falcon is.
>>
>> That should tell you that we're not the same person.
>...
>
>Not necessarily. Because if you were the same person, in the guise
>of one persona you would be interested in such things, while in the
>other you wouldn't.
Ah but I am interested in the transcripts of the Saville enquiry. I
just don't have time to read them all, whereas our man Falcon, might
read them as part of his job...
>> Amusing idea though, that I should concoct such an adversarial and
>> knowledgeable opponent though.
>>
>> You are either over-estimating me or trolling.
>>
>> Either way, I find that amusing.
>
>...
>Budgie doesn't! He finds it deeply annoying for some reason.
I also find that amusing.
>> >> > you and Budgie are one and the same person.
>> >>
>> >> Please don't lump me in with my enemy as being the same person.
>> >...
>> >
>> >Some people need "enemies" as much as others need friends. So can
>> >they really be "enemies" at all ?
>>
>> Oh definitely. A friend is someone you love, someone you desire the
>> best for, maybe to a minor degree, whereas an enemy is someone you
>> hate, .i.e. desire the worst for. So, in answer to your question, yes.
>
>That's not what I was getting at really. If you've ever known a couple
>fight like cat and dog you might be surprised why they stick together
>at all. But they need one another as much as any traditinal "happily
>married couple" need each other.
Its called co-dependance.
> Enmity can be as great a bond as
>love - people can maintain their identity as much through disgreeing
>with people i.e like tearing into the Yanks on here grrrrrrrrr! hoot!
>- as they can identifying with the people they like.
I think you're right though. To an extent the relationship between the
Republican Paramilitaries and the British Army is like this.
>One other thing Nik, none of my business but: - justification based
>on public support for punishment beatings etc - would those same people
>be in favour of the re-introduction of Capital Punishment as well I wonder?
I don't know.
>Makes me uncomfortable anyway. Leaders and followers Nik, leaders and
>followers. Not that there's any easy answer I know, as policing of some
>kind is clearly required.
You're right.
> But it does make for terrible PR.
Right again.
Nik
Nik O'Kiwi
<mjad...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
Ha ha ha ha ha............<rotflmao>
>But nevertheless I must point out to you Ray, that the only way you
>could really know for certain that Falcon and Nik are definitley
>not the same person - given that Falcon takes such pains to hide
>his real identity - is if you yourself are also either Nik or Falcon.
>
>I don't quite know how you're going to take this news of your unmasking.
>
>But there it is I'm afraid.
<laugh>
Nik
Nik O'Kiwi
<Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>NOTE: This message was sent thru a mail2news gateway.
>No effort was made to verify the identity of the sender.
>--------------------------------------------------------
>
>"Nik O'Kiwi" <repub...@email.com> wrote in message
>news:te9obvc1t6a4brf28...@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 9 May 2003 18:02:47 +0100, "michael adams"
>> <mjad...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>[..]
>
>> >Budgie doesn't! He finds it deeply annoying for some reason.
>>
>> I also find that amusing.
>
>Why do you think I find it annoying?
I'm going by other people's reports.
> Is it because I pointed out that you
>and Conor have the same dual identity obsession?
Err...no.
Nik
michael adams
"Falcon" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:N0760AWX3775...@anonymous.poster...
>
> Sorry Nik, I actually replied to the wrong post. I was attempting to ask
> Michael, but thinking about it, it's probably a daft thing to do ...
>
it certainly is from your point of view.
> -------
> Falcon:
> social secretary:
> sean o'callaghan appreciation society
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This message was posted from the Institute of Gullibity Studies.
> The original sender is becoming deeply confused
> and changes his sig on a weekly basis.
>
> For sale: Latin dictionary. Plus a nearly new copy of "The Informer"
> by Sean o'Callaghan. Both going cheep...cheep
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
michael adams
"Falcon" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:N0760AWX3775...@anonymous.poster...
now with added Shergar!
>
> Sorry Nik, I actually replied to the wrong post. I was attempting to ask
> Michael, but thinking about it, it's probably a daft thing to do ...
>
> -------
> -------
> Falcon:
> social secretary:
> sean o'callaghan appreciation society
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This message was posted from the Institute of Gullibility Studies.
> The original sender is becoming deeply confused
> and changes his sig on a weekly basis.
>
> For sale: Latin dictionary. Plus a nearly new copy of "The Informer"
> by Sean o'Callaghan and a Framed Picture of Shergar
> All going cheep...cheep...cheep
>
>
>
>
>
Harry Merrick
> "Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3eba...@news.boards.ie...
>
> > No, becuase it is most certainly in the Dictionary that I use. I am not in
> > the habit of telling lies!
> > >
> ______________________________________________________________
>
> "Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3eb8...@news.boards.ie...
> >
> >
> >You do have to excuse the Ulster
> > accent! - Oh, by the way, he IS quite right of course!! :-))
> >
> > Harry Merrick
>
> "Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3eb8...@news.boards.ie...
> >
> >
> > TUT! Who said that I spoke with an accent??? - Definately BBC!
> > >
> > > ...
> ___________________________________________________________________
>
> Sorry you were saying?
You are over editing again!! - There are no lies in anything I said in all that!
>
>
> > >
> > > But they do make exceedingly good soda bread. And unlike some of the
> > > other philistines sell it uncut. What is the world coming to?
> > > Sliced soda bread ! No don't tell me Harry.
> >
> > No, they don't, not yet!
>
> ...
>
> No. What I was seeking to imply Harry, is that you are indeed the type
> of person who would buy such an abomination as sliced soda-bread!
You wouldn't know what type I am, and in any case, you are wrong. I am very fond
of the Ulster Fry which incorporates unadulterated soda-bread and potato bread!
>
>
> Irwins put molasses in it IIRR. A flavour it's imposible to
> reproduce but also very fattening if taken to extremse.
No doubt. But good for one nonetheless.
>
>
> ...
>
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > As for
> > > > driving a bread van, well why not? What is wrong with that? Bread Van
> > > > Drivers probably earn a lot more than me in any case!!
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Why do you assume I'm necessarily implying there's anything wrong with
> > > somebody driving a bread van Harry? Good bread van drivers - who sweet
> > > talk all their customers - as indeed you sweet talk everybody on here -
> > > can indeed earn good money. So you're a coach driver then are you?
> >
> > LOL! A very expensive company car driver actually!
> > >
> > > ...
>
> I'm not wishing to be nosey - as wheedling information out of people
> on Usenet can be seen as a bit of a game - but it's your own company car?
By the very wording, it is a company car. Hence it is not my own car.
>
> You're not a chauffeur then?
Are you trying to be funny? What would be wrong if I *was* a chauffeur?
Too late!
>
>
> ...
>
> > Of course, ther is no such thing as a pure bred Irishman anyway. we are
> > all blowins. After all, it is suggested due to their accent, that the
> > people of Cork were the Welsh who learnt to swim!
> > >
> > > ...
>
> Or float!
If that be the case, they were very lucky with the wind direction. Or perhaps
they sang across.
Harry Merrick.
michael adams
> > > >
> > > > But they do make exceedingly good soda bread. And unlike some of the
> > > > other philistines sell it uncut. What is the world coming to?
> > > > Sliced soda bread ! No don't tell me Harry.
> > >
> > > No, they don't, not yet!
> >
> > ...
> >
> > No. What I was seeking to imply Harry, is that you are indeed the type
> > of person who would buy such an abomination as sliced soda-bread!
>
> You wouldn't know what type I am, and in any case, you are wrong.
...
The type of person who buys sliced soda-bread of course. Didn't I just
say. What can't you understand?
...
I am very fond
> of the Ulster Fry which incorporates unadulterated soda-bread and potato
bread!
>
...
You're lucky to be able to indulge in all that without it putting the
pounds on you though. As with the soda-bread below. Years ago *everyone*
seemed to be far more active than they are today and could stay thin.
Nowadays only the lucky few can manage it naturally.
...
> >
> >
> > Irwins put molasses in it IIRR. A flavour it's imposible to
> > reproduce but also very fattening if taken to extremse.
>
> No doubt. But good for one nonetheless.
>
> > > LOL! A very expensive company car driver actually!
> > > >
> > > > ...
> >
> > I'm not wishing to be nosey - as wheedling information out of people
> > on Usenet can be seen as a bit of a game - but it's your own company
car?
>
> By the very wording, it is a company car. Hence it is not my own car.
...
It would indeed be Harry (on expenses anyway) if you were the Managing
Director of the Merrick Marmalade Co of even just H. Merrick Painting
and Decorating. However as you previously mentioned working for an
international company (so my dayabase says anyway) that would seem to
rule those out. An expensive company car though eh? So you must be a fairly
big cheese then? O.K do you work on commission? Are you willing to answer
that one ? Not double glazing by any chance is it?
...
> >
> > You're not a chauffeur then?
>
> Are you trying to be funny? What would be wrong if I *was* a chauffeur?
>
...
Nothing at all! Why do you automatically assume I'm trying to be funny
all the time Harry? And on a Ng of all places! Being a chaffeur is a very
responsible job. They don't just take anyone. Except that is if you're
French, have a drink problem, and work at the Ritz in Paris.
...
> > > Not at all. I was wrong actually, because as a direct result of the
> > sinking
> > > of the Spanish Armada due to a storm off the Irish coast, many Irish
> > people
> > > have the mediterrainian look about them to this day.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > No need to tell me Harry. Exactly one half of one side of my family
> > split 50\50 two generations running. Around half of both the boys and
girls
> > with black hair and dark eyes the other half brown hair and blue\grey
eyes.
> > That was in Mayo. But it could be Moorish Blood as well, they reckon.
> > Just don't let Logan know.
>
> Too late!
...
To be quite honest I just don't care anymore Harry. As acording to another
poster on this group, I'm just all mixed up anyway. Some people can be
just so cruel at times. They simply don't know the damage they can
do with their clever remarks.
..
> > > Of course, ther is no such thing as a pure bred Irishman anyway. we
are
> > > all blowins. After all, it is suggested due to their accent, that the
> > > people of Cork were the Welsh who learnt to swim!
Don't tell me Harry, just try telling that to Keano!
michael adams
...
Harry Merrick
> "Harry Merrick" <merr...@agencies.dnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3EBE2722...@agencies.dnet.co.uk...
>
> > > > >
> > > > > But they do make exceedingly good soda bread. And unlike some of the
> > > > > other philistines sell it uncut. What is the world coming to?
> > > > > Sliced soda bread ! No don't tell me Harry.
> > > >
> > > > No, they don't, not yet!
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > No. What I was seeking to imply Harry, is that you are indeed the type
> > > of person who would buy such an abomination as sliced soda-bread!
> >
> > You wouldn't know what type I am, and in any case, you are wrong.
>
> ...
>
> The type of person who buys sliced soda-bread of course.
I fully understand what you said. And I replied that I like unadulterated
soda-bread , unsliced.
> Didn't I just
> say. What can't you understand?
It would appear to me that it is you, not me, who cannot understand.
>
>
> ...
>
> I am very fond
> > of the Ulster Fry which incorporates unadulterated soda-bread and potato
> bread!
> >
> ...
>
> You're lucky to be able to indulge in all that without it putting the
> pounds on you though. As with the soda-bread below. Years ago *everyone*
> seemed to be far more active than they are today and could stay thin.
> Nowadays only the lucky few can manage it naturally.
>
It all relies on very good, in fact excellent, genes, of course.
> >
> > > Irwins put molasses in it IIRR. A flavour it's imposible to
> > > reproduce but also very fattening if taken to extremse.
> >
> > No doubt. But good for one nonetheless.
> >
>
> > > > LOL! A very expensive company car driver actually!
> > > > >
> > > > > ...
> > >
> > > I'm not wishing to be nosey - as wheedling information out of people
> > > on Usenet can be seen as a bit of a game - but it's your own company
> car?
> >
> > By the very wording, it is a company car. Hence it is not my own car.
> ...
>
> It would indeed be Harry (on expenses anyway) if you were the Managing
> Director of the Merrick Marmalade Co of even just H. Merrick Painting
> and Decorating. However as you previously mentioned working for an
> international company (so my dayabase says anyway) that would seem to
> rule those out. An expensive company car though eh?
No, sorry, I meant that "I" was expensive, not the car!
> So you must be a fairly
> big cheese then? O.K do you work on commission?
Both.
> Are you willing to answer
> that one ?
Yes.
> Not double glazing by any chance is it?
Most certainly not! - Since when did a double glazing rep. cover the whole
country?
>
>
> ...
>
> > >
> > > You're not a chauffeur then?
> >
> > Are you trying to be funny? What would be wrong if I *was* a chauffeur?
> >
> ...
>
> Nothing at all! Why do you automatically assume I'm trying to be funny
> all the time Harry?
Oh, it is your fascinating prose style. Perhaps you cannot help it.
> And on a Ng of all places!
Indeed!
> Being a chaffeur is a very
> responsible job. They don't just take anyone. Except that is if you're
> French, have a drink problem, and work at the Ritz in Paris.
Yes, I might have put money on it that you would work that one in somehow!
>
>
> ...
>
> > > > Not at all. I was wrong actually, because as a direct result of the
> > > sinking
> > > > of the Spanish Armada due to a storm off the Irish coast, many Irish
> > > people
> > > > have the mediterrainian look about them to this day.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > No need to tell me Harry. Exactly one half of one side of my family
> > > split 50\50 two generations running. Around half of both the boys and
> girls
> > > with black hair and dark eyes the other half brown hair and blue\grey
> eyes.
> > > That was in Mayo. But it could be Moorish Blood as well, they reckon.
> > > Just don't let Logan know.
> >
> > Too late!
>
> ...
>
> To be quite honest I just don't care anymore Harry. As acording to another
> poster on this group, I'm just all mixed up anyway.
Goodness! How could that possibly be?
> Some people can be
> just so cruel at times.
Yes indeed. I too am reduced to the bottle and tears of the crocodile variety on
numerous occasions. Oh dear! Now I have done it! I will be accused of being
pompous and Dickensian now! - Always leave myself exposed for ad hominem attack!
But it sure does flush the idiots out of the trees.
> They simply don't know the damage they can
> do with their clever remarks.
Certainly not. And do they care? Not a bit!
>
>
> ..
>
> > > > Of course, ther is no such thing as a pure bred Irishman anyway. we
> are
> > > > all blowins. After all, it is suggested due to their accent, that the
> > > > people of Cork were the Welsh who learnt to swim!
>
> Don't tell me Harry, just try telling that to Keano!
Keano? Oh, he is so full of hot air and bluster he wouldn't need to know how to
swim!
Harry Merrick.