Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  13 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
J  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 1:27 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish
From: "J" <Jvisi...@live.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 01:27:57 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 1:27 am
Subject: Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'
 Promiscuity

Gay author Gabriel Rotello notes the perspective of many gays that "Gay
liberation was founded . . . on a 'sexual brotherhood of promiscuity,' and
any abandonment of that promiscuity would amount to a 'communal betrayal of
gargantuan proportions.'" Rotello's perception of gay promiscuity, which he
criticizes, is consistent with survey results. A far-ranging study of
homosexual men published in 1978 revealed that 75 percent of
self-identified, white, gay men admitted to having sex with more than 100
different males in their lifetime: 15 percent claimed 100-249 sex partners;
17 percent claimed 250- 499; 15 percent claimed 500-999; and 28 percent
claimed more than 1,000 lifetime male sex partners.By 1984, after the AIDS
epidemic had taken hold, homosexual men were reportedly curtailing
promiscuity, but not by much. Instead of more than 6 partners per month in
1982, the average non-monogamous respondent in San Francisco reported having
about 4 partners per month in 1984.

In more recent years, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control has reported an
upswing in promiscuity, at least among young homosexual men in San
Francisco. From 1994 to 1997, the percentage of homosexual men reporting
multiple partners and unprotected anal sex rose from 23.6 percent to 33.3
percent, with the largest increase among men under 25. Despite its
continuing incurability, AIDS no longer seems to deter individuals from
engaging in promiscuous gay sex.

The data relating to gay promiscuity were obtained from self-identified gay
men. Some advocates argue that the average would be lower if closeted
homosexuals were included in the statistics. That is likely true, according
to data obtained in a 2000 survey in Australia that tracked whether men who
had sex with men were associated with the gay community. Men who were
associated with the gay community were nearly four times as likely to have
had more than 50 sex partners in the six months preceding the survey as men
who were not associated with the gay community. This may imply that it is
riskier to be "out" than "closeted." Adopting a gay identity may create more
pressure to be promiscuous and to be so with a cohort of other more
promiscuous partners.

Excessive sexual promiscuity results in serious medical consequences -
indeed, it is a recipe for transmitting disease and generating an epidemic.
The HIV/AIDS epidemic has remained a predominantly gay issue in the U.S.
primarily because of the greater degree of promiscuity among gays. A study
based upon statistics from 1986 through 1990 estimated that 20-year-old gay
men had a 50 percent chance of becoming HIV positive by age 55. As of June
2001, nearly 64 percent of men with AIDS were men who have had sex with men.
Syphilis is also more common among gay men. The San Francisco Public Health
Department recently reported that syphilis among the city's gay and bisexual
men was at epidemic levels. According to the San Francisco Chronicle:

  "Experts believe syphilis is on the rise among gay and bisexual men
because they are engaging in unprotected sex with multiple partners, many of
whom they met in anonymous situations such as sex clubs, adult bookstores,
meetings through the Internet and in bathhouses. The new data will show that
in the 93 cases involving gay and bisexual men this year, the group reported
having 1,225 sexual partners."
A study done in Baltimore and reported in the Archives of Internal Medicine
found that gay men contracted syphilis at three to four times the rate of
heterosexuals. Promiscuity is the factor most responsible for the extreme
rates of these and other Sexually Transmitted Diseases cited below, many of
which result in a shortened life span for men who have sex with men.

Promiscuity among lesbians is less extreme, but it is still higher than
among heterosexual women. Overall, women tend to have fewer sex partners
than men. But there is a surprising finding about lesbian promiscuity in the
literature. Australian investigators reported that lesbian women were 4.5
times more likely to have had more than 50 lifetime male partners than
heterosexual women (9 percent of lesbians versus 2 percent of heterosexual
women); and 93 percent of women who identified themselves as lesbian
reported a history of sex with men. Other studies similarly show that 75-90
percent of women who have sex with women have also had sex with men.

--
J Young
Jvisi...@live.com


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Seon Ferguson  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 1:52 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish
From: "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:52:43 +1100
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 1:52 am
Subject: Re: Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'
Thanks for posting this. If you vote against same sex marriage you are on
the same side as the hater "J" hopefully this makes people think twice
before voting against it!

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chom Noamsky  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 2:10 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish
From: Chom Noamsky <d...@bark.grrrr>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:10:00 GMT
Subject: Re: Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'

J wrote:
>  Promiscuity

One thing I cannot understand, J, for the life of me, is how does
opposing gay marriage discourage promiscuity in the gay community?

A rational human would think, if promiscuity is such a health problem in
that community, the best thing would be to give them a reason to enter
into committed monogamous relationships and marry.  There is no cure for
homosexuality because it isn't a disease.  They aren't going to
magically become heterosexuals by forbidding them to marry.

But people like you are not rational.  You think the solution to a
problem is maintaining the status quo when the status quo is actually
the problem.  If you have identified promiscuity as a social and moral
evil, your opposition makes no sense because it is the only real
solution to curbing the promiscuity (unless your real desire is to stone
homosexuals to death or burn them at the stake).

If somebody ever figures out how the bizarre social conservative mind
works, millions of people would like to know.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Pat Magroyne  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 2:14 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish, alt.atheism
From: Pat Magroyne <patmagro...@null.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:14:28 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 2:14 am
Subject: Re: Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'
On Nov 8, 1:27 am, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:

>  Promiscuity

Care to tell us how promiscuity figures in when considering who should
be allowed to marry?

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <www.LayoffRemedy.com>  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 4:06 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish
From: "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> " <x...@m.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:06:29 GMT
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 4:06 am
Subject: Re: Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 01:27:57 -0500,
"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" <Jvisi...@live.com> spewed:

>       Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on
> same-sex marriage.

<MORONIC hate-swill flushed>

     THIS is what voters need to consider:

http://www.Egalitarian.biz/Marriage-is-MARRIAGE.html

              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

                •••                   Rest in Peace                    •••
                •••          George Richard Tiller, MD          •••
                •••           A True American HERO!            •••
                •••    August 8, 1941 – May 31, 2009      •••
                •••      Visit --  http://iamdrtiller.com         •••

              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

                 -- Craig Chilton  <xanadu...@mchsi.com>

 www.LayoffRemedy.com -- Unemployment Solution!
 www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the RRR Cult!
 http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
 http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Bigotry
 www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
 www.TravelForPay.org -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL!


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Sorry Catholic pervert. Same Sex Marriage is legal and has been entrenched in the Canadian constitution for 5 years now, you have already lost." by Studious Rex
Studious Rex  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 5:30 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish
Followup-To: alt.barney.dinosaur.die.die.die, alt.christnet.second-coming.real-soon-now
From: Studious Rex <caseyterry5...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 02:30:58 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 5:30 am
Subject: Sorry Catholic pervert. Same Sex Marriage is legal and has been entrenched in the Canadian constitution for 5 years now, you have already lost.
Sorry Catholic pervert.  Same Sex Marriage is legal and has been
entrenched in the Canadian constitution  for 5 years now, you have
already lost.

Go back to drooling over your kiddie porn.

The day we burn the churches and imprison perverts like you will be
one for celebration

How many times do you get beaten in a week for stalking children?


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'" by Sophistry Made Simple
Sophistry Made Simple  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 7:22 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish
From: "Sophistry Made Simple" <spamala...@yourrplace.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:22:31 -0000
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 7:22 am
Subject: Re: Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'

"J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote in message

news:392due.v56.19.1@news.alt.net...

> Promiscuity

It's not because they are gay, it's because they are men.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Benway (original non-Zionist)  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 7:23 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish
From: "Benway (original non-Zionist)" <captai...@mailpuppy.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 04:23:20 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 7:23 am
Subject: Re: Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'

*****************************************

The political fagdykes have taken the rest of
for a ride into multicultural Hell, where
we pay all the bills for their idiocies.

*****************************************


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Augustus O'Muircheartaigh  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 8:25 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish
From: "Augustus O'Muircheartaigh" <victorburgu...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 05:25:29 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 8:25 am
Subject: Re: Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'
On Nov 8, 12:23 pm, "Benway (original non-Zionist)"

Awwwwwww; don't be like that; come on over here and give us a nice big
hug and we can alllll be friends.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
IAAH  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 8:55 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish
From: IAAH <n...@email.exist>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:55:53 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 8:55 am
Subject: Re: Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'
On 11/8/09 1:27 AM, * J wrote:

>  Promiscuity

How is any of that a narrowly tailored and
compelling argument against equal rights, Iben?

--
"I do not pretend to be able to prove that there
is no God. I equally cannot
prove that Satan is a fiction. The Christian god
may exist; so may the gods of
Olympus, or of ancient Egypt, or of Babylon. But
no one of these hypotheses is
more probable than any other: they lie outside the
region of even probable
knowledge, and therefore there is no reason to
consider any of them."
        Bertrand Russell

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Augustus O'Muircheartaigh  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 8:59 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish
From: "Augustus O'Muircheartaigh" <victorburgu...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 05:59:52 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 8:59 am
Subject: Re: Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'
On Nov 8, 1:55 pm, IAAH <n...@email.exist> wrote:

I believe in Bertrand Russell; a god among men.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Falcon  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 9:08 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish
From: "Falcon" <fal...@invalid.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:08:40 -0000
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 9:08 am
Subject: Re: Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'

Sophistry Made Simple wrote:
> "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote in message
> news:392due.v56.19.1@news.alt.net...
>> Promiscuity

> It's not because they are gay, it's because they are men.

Seconded. Anyone who doesn't think so has a personal gender identity
problem. Ah, what it was to be young ...

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Archie  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 11:34 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.irish
From: Archie <akenn...@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 08:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 11:34 am
Subject: Re: Facts to consider when deciding how to vote on same-sex 'marriage'
On Nov 8, 2:10 am, Chom Noamsky <d...@bark.grrrr> wrote:

> If somebody ever figures out how the bizarre social conservative mind
> works, millions of people would like to know.

http://www.awitness.org/journal/political_conservatism_as_motivated_s...

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google