Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Now that the Pentagon has made even Congress impotent, we might need a King - who is willing to tell it to the yellow-toothed, combat-unready, airchair generals: admit it: you guys love to go around and fight, bypassing we senators, don't ya, don't ya?
1 view
Skip to first unread message
lo yeeOn
May 16, 2013, 11:38:59 PM5/16/13
to
http://rt.com/usa/terror-al-qaeda-pentagon-war-397/
Pentagon plans to fight "War on Terror" for another 20 years
Get short URL Published time: May 16, 2013 21:32
Even after cutting off the head of al-Qaeda, the United States
Department of Defense doesn't believe an end to the war on terror is
in sight. On Thursday, one Pentagon official predicted the mission
against al-Qaeda could continue for another two decades.
Speaking to the Senate Armed Services early Thursday, Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Special Operations Michael Sheehan said the
Pentagon has no plans to pull out of its almost 12-year-old war
overseas.
When asked for his take on how long the war on terror could go on for,
Sheehan told lawmakers, "At least 10 to 20 years."
According to US President Barack Obama, the last combat troops will
move out of Afghanistan in 2014. If remarks from Sheehan and others
are at all accurate, though, in reality the war could last through the
2030s.
Sheehan was being grilled by members of the Senate committee on
Thursday over not just the future of the war, but what rules are in
play to continue the operation. Congress granted then-President George
W. Bush the power to go after al-Qaeda in 2001 by signing the
Authorization to Use Military Force, a legislation that essentially
gave the go-ahead to use America's might by any means necessary to
avenge the attacks of 9/11. Nearly 13 years later, though, some
members of the Senate saw that the overly broad powers extended to the
commander-in-chief through the AUMF are being used to justify a
widening war that now has soldiers targeting insurgents in venue like
Yemen and Somalia.
The scope of America's counterterrorism program, Sheehan said, from
Boston to the stretches "referring to the FATA," region of Pakistan
considered a hotbed of terrorism. Because of that widening arena,
some senators said it's time to rewrite the law.
It has spread throughout North Africa, throughout the Maghreb,"
Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) said during the hearing. "The
situation's changed dramatically."
But while some lawmakers suggested it was time to revise the AUMF,
Pentagon officials said the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act
updated the law to grant the president power not just to target
overseas terrorists, but suspects believed to be associated forces.
Robert Taylor, the acting general counsel of the Department of
Defense, said that the NDAA's update to the Bush-era bill means that
even suspects born after the September 11 attacks could be targeted as
warriors in the war on terror.
"As long as they become an associated force under the legal standard
that was set out," Taylor testified, according to Wired's Spencer
Ackerman.
Sen. Angus King, an Independent from Maine, suggested the Pentagon was
uninterested in changing the AUMF because they are using it to justify
a war that wouldn't otherwise be legal.
"This is the most disturbing hearing I've been to in some time," King
said. "You guys have rewritten the Constitution today."
"You guys have invented this term, associated forces, that's nowhere
in this document," King said. "It's the justification for everything,
and it renders the war powers of Congress null and void."
"I assume [the AUMF] does suit you well because you're reading it to
fit everything, and it doesn't, the general rule of war applies,"
Even McCain, who has been by and large considered a hawkish member of
the Senate, spoke out against the Pentagon's reluctance to re-write a
law that they are using to justify a war that could take US troops to
all corners of the globe for the unforeseeable future. "For you to
come here and say, "`We don't need to change it,' I think, is
disturbing,"
Before stepping down as secretary of defense, former Pentagon chief
Leon Panetta said in late 2011, "We're winning this very tough
conflict." Osama bin Laden was executed five months later, and the
Central Intelligence Agency and DoD have continuously utilized strikes
to weaken al-Qaeda substantially since.
Pentagon plans to fight "War on Terror" for another 20 years
Get short URL Published time: May 16, 2013 21:32
Even after cutting off the head of al-Qaeda, the United States
Department of Defense doesn't believe an end to the war on terror is
in sight. On Thursday, one Pentagon official predicted the mission
against al-Qaeda could continue for another two decades.
Speaking to the Senate Armed Services early Thursday, Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Special Operations Michael Sheehan said the
Pentagon has no plans to pull out of its almost 12-year-old war
overseas.
When asked for his take on how long the war on terror could go on for,
Sheehan told lawmakers, "At least 10 to 20 years."
According to US President Barack Obama, the last combat troops will
move out of Afghanistan in 2014. If remarks from Sheehan and others
are at all accurate, though, in reality the war could last through the
2030s.
Sheehan was being grilled by members of the Senate committee on
Thursday over not just the future of the war, but what rules are in
play to continue the operation. Congress granted then-President George
W. Bush the power to go after al-Qaeda in 2001 by signing the
Authorization to Use Military Force, a legislation that essentially
gave the go-ahead to use America's might by any means necessary to
avenge the attacks of 9/11. Nearly 13 years later, though, some
members of the Senate saw that the overly broad powers extended to the
commander-in-chief through the AUMF are being used to justify a
widening war that now has soldiers targeting insurgents in venue like
Yemen and Somalia.
The scope of America's counterterrorism program, Sheehan said, from
Boston to the stretches "referring to the FATA," region of Pakistan
considered a hotbed of terrorism. Because of that widening arena,
some senators said it's time to rewrite the law.
It has spread throughout North Africa, throughout the Maghreb,"
Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) said during the hearing. "The
situation's changed dramatically."
But while some lawmakers suggested it was time to revise the AUMF,
Pentagon officials said the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act
updated the law to grant the president power not just to target
overseas terrorists, but suspects believed to be associated forces.
Robert Taylor, the acting general counsel of the Department of
Defense, said that the NDAA's update to the Bush-era bill means that
even suspects born after the September 11 attacks could be targeted as
warriors in the war on terror.
"As long as they become an associated force under the legal standard
that was set out," Taylor testified, according to Wired's Spencer
Ackerman.
Sen. Angus King, an Independent from Maine, suggested the Pentagon was
uninterested in changing the AUMF because they are using it to justify
a war that wouldn't otherwise be legal.
"This is the most disturbing hearing I've been to in some time," King
said. "You guys have rewritten the Constitution today."
"You guys have invented this term, associated forces, that's nowhere
in this document," King said. "It's the justification for everything,
and it renders the war powers of Congress null and void."
"I assume [the AUMF] does suit you well because you're reading it to
fit everything, and it doesn't, the general rule of war applies,"
Even McCain, who has been by and large considered a hawkish member of
the Senate, spoke out against the Pentagon's reluctance to re-write a
law that they are using to justify a war that could take US troops to
all corners of the globe for the unforeseeable future. "For you to
come here and say, "`We don't need to change it,' I think, is
disturbing,"
Before stepping down as secretary of defense, former Pentagon chief
Leon Panetta said in late 2011, "We're winning this very tough
conflict." Osama bin Laden was executed five months later, and the
Central Intelligence Agency and DoD have continuously utilized strikes
to weaken al-Qaeda substantially since.
0 new messages