I wrote the letters to President of EU, to President of USA... But with great probability their secretaries will drop my letters into rubbish. So, if you do not want to play in Russian Roulette, compose your own letter or agree with mine.
Dear President!
I am the author of the theory of magnetic hole. According to this theory magnetic holes can be created soon at the Large Hadron Collider. That will lead to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth’s shell into outer space.
I give the following probabilities: A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV; B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not happen; C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen. 30% I leave to my mistake.
Why is such confidence?
Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole: GMm / r = mc^2 / 2; pB = mc^2.
It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is reached at the energies, achievable in modern colliders, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html There are many arguments in favor the fact that magnetic holes exist, and astronomers see them, but call them on the error as black holes, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html It was found several crude errors and criminal lies in the assessment documents about the safety of LHC, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html
The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters. --
> > According to Russian online “opinion poll” at November 6, 2009, 52% of > > respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat. > > But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime > > experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now! > So you think some country will bomb the LHC before it can get'm?
To bomb the LHC now is better, than LHS destroy the Earth. CERN physicists do not want to listen about magnetic hole. They are potential killers of our planet. CERN physicists must be put into prison now; - otherwise they kill all of us.
The rate of MH’s growth is not known exactly. Magnetic Hole can destroy the Earth in the period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days. If the second is correct, then you will wish to bomb the LHC yourself. But then it would not save you already. Because Magnetic Holes would already grow inside the Earth.
I repeat: the probability of Earth explosion, caused by LHC, is about 50 %.
-- Listen, “Inertial”.
You did not understand what magnetic hole is. It is quite had. But you can try if I am a liar or a stupid boy by solving two my simple problems.
1. Let the length of free path of a particle is equal to 1 meter, r = 1 m. Let the radius of the object is equal to 1000 meters, R = 1000 m. How many collisions will undergo the particle in order to exit the object?
Solution. R/r = 1000. N = (R/r)^2 = 1 000 000.
2. How many Earth’s protons will ruin the dangerous particle if R/r = 10^9?
A. CERN’s solution: N = (R/r)^2 = 10^18. B. My solution: The Earth has its own gravity field. Consequently, the trajectory of a particle between collisions will not be straight line, but curved to the center of attraction. As a result the dangerous particle will constantly drift to the center of the Earth. As a result the dangerous particle will ruin about N/n Earth’s protons, where: N – the total number of Earth’s protons; n – the number of created dangerous particles.
Dear "Inertial", which solution is correct: mine or CERN’s?
That was one crude error, made in the CERN’s safety documentation. I had fount three such errors and one false assertion.
CERN will kill you if you will not ruin this criminal organization. Harry, you have only about 20 days to do that and save your and your children’s lives. --
> Are you seriously suggesting that science should be driven by public > opinion?
Physicists in their majority are confident that heavy particles, created at LHC will decay. That is a crude error.
LHC can create a particle with the mass by 10 000 times greater than the mass of proton.
To imagine this, compare the masses of a human and of a railway train.
Imagine the situation if biologists would make a creature with the mass of railway train, but having the human size. What will happen to you if this creature would seat at the roof of your house, exactly over you? Any roof will be broken and you would be smashed into a thin film and pushed deep into the ground.
Now imagine a proton, as soap bubble, and a liquid drop of the same size. What will happen to protons, if the bubble has a field, attracting protons? Protons would be ruined and their remnants would condense onto the drop.
Particle physicists have no such imagination. Those idiots think that proton consists from three point-like quarks. In fact proton is composed from some continuous substance, rotating with relativistic velocity. This rotating substance creates three mixed electro- magneto- weak poles: u, u, d. At strong magnetic field this three-pole construction can be ruined, and the two-pole construction can be created. This process is accompanied by ejection of positron.
There are two independent math proves that this reconstruction can be performed at energies about 0,25 TeV per colliding particle, if the magnetic moment of resulting two-pole particle is the same as the magnetic moment of proton. If its value is different, then the needed energy would also be different.
Official science is corrupted and rotten organism. It will never approve the idea, created at the camp of independent researchers. Official science would better explode the Earth, than say that magnetic holes are possible and that LHC is deadly dangerous for our civilization. That is why the official science is criminal now. So, do not think that CERN would stop the LHC. CERN will kill us all with probability about 50% --
Note 2: The time needed the microscopic black hole capture the whole Earth is mach greater than million years. Consequently, they are safe for now living people on the Earth. The time needed the magnetic hole capture the whole Earth is about 1000 seconds. Consequently, magnetic holes can explode the Earth and Solar system.
Note 3: We know two types of explosions chemical and nuclear. Astronomers see the third type of explosions – collaptical. At nuclear explosion only few thousand’s parts of explosive rest energy is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of fragments. At some stellar collaptical explosions about a half of rest energy of the star is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of the rejected stellar shell. What type of collaptical explosions do astronomers observe: gravitational into black hole or magnetic into magnetic hole? Is it possible to switch the magnetic collapse at collider? My answers: The observed collapses are magnetic ones. Magnetic collapse can be switched on by powerful colliders.
LHC will be switched on in the mead-November; the first collisions are waited in a few weeks later. Do we survive or do we start into outer space?
Dear physicists, you again and again repeat the biggest error of Stephen Hawking. In the CERN's article “The safety of the LHC” http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.html you can find a dozen of comparisons with cosmic rays.
Hawking: "The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on. The LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy occur millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing terrible happens."
This error will cost us the life of our Civilization.
The biggest error is in the comparison of A and B. A. Collisions of protons at LHC; B. Collisions of cosmic protons with atmospheric protons.
Similarity: Energies in A and B are sufficient in order to make microscopic magnetic holes.
Difference: Velocities of created holes relatively surrounding matter are drastically great. A. Magnetic holes, made on LHC, can have very small velocities. B. According to conservation law of 4-momentum, cosmic holes have relativistic velocities.
Result: A. LHC’s holes capture slowly moving particles and grow. The bigger hole becomes – the bigger its rate of growth. B. Atmosphere particles move relatively holes with relativistic velocities and, correspondingly, they have TeV kinetic energy, relatively holes. As a result, magnetic holes evaporate immediately. Such collisions lead to creation of showers of secondary particles. Physicists observe such showers.
Analogy: Let’s compare the behavior of “nuclear quasi-hole” with the behavior of magnetic hole. Let’s investigate two cases:
A. Bombarding particles are neutrons, having the kinetic energies, equal to several in eV. B. Bombarding neutrons have kinetic energies, equal to several TeV.
B. Evaporation. TeV-energy neutrons will ruin the nucleus in the backward order in crude approximation.
Nuclear collapse is impossible because the repulsive electrostatic forces of protons. That is way, I named nucleus by “nuclear quasi- holes”. Magnetic collapse has no limit. Magnetic hole will grow till there is the food, - the matter of planet or star.
Physicists, did you see the difference?
Look here: fig. SN 1987A. That is an image of remnants of exploded star. You can see there three
> I wrote the letters to President of EU, to President of USA... > But with great probability their secretaries will drop my letters into > rubbish. > So, if you do not want to play in Russian Roulette, compose your own > letter or agree with mine.
> Dear President!
> I am the author of the theory of magnetic hole. According to this > theory magnetic holes can be created soon at the Large Hadron > Collider. That will lead to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
> November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large > Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV > will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies > of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to > stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth=3Fs shell into outer > space.
> I give the following probabilities: > A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV; > B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not > happen; > C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen. > 30% I leave to my mistake.
> Why is such confidence?
> Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole: > GMm / r = mc^2 / 2; > pB = mc^2.
> It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is > reached at the energies, achievable in modern colliders, > http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html > There are many arguments in favor the fact that magnetic holes exist, > and astronomers see them, but call them on the error as black holes, > http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html > It was found several crude errors and criminal lies in the assessment > documents about the safety of LHC, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html
> The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small > region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region=3Fs diameter is > about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters. > -- > > > According to Russian online =3Fopinion poll=3F at November 6, 2009, 52% of > > > respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat. > > > But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime > > > experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now!
> > So you think some country will bomb the LHC before it can get'm?
> To bomb the LHC now is better, than LHS destroy the Earth. CERN > physicists do not want to listen about magnetic hole. They are > potential killers of our planet. CERN physicists must be put into > prison now; - otherwise they kill all of us.
> The rate of MH=3Fs growth is not known exactly. Magnetic Hole can > destroy the Earth in the period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days. If > the > second is correct, then you will wish to bomb the LHC yourself. But > then it would not save you already. Because Magnetic Holes would > already grow inside the Earth.
> I repeat: the probability of Earth explosion, caused by LHC, is about > 50 %.
> -- > Listen, =3FInertial=3F.
> You did not understand what magnetic hole is. It is quite had. > But you can try if I am a liar or a stupid boy by solving two my > simple problems.
> 1. Let the length of free path of a particle is equal to 1 meter, r = > 1 m. > Let the radius of the object is equal to 1000 meters, R = 1000 m. > How many collisions will undergo the particle in order to exit the > object?
> Solution. R/r = 1000. N = (R/r)^2 = 1 000 000.
> 2. How many Earth=3Fs protons will ruin the dangerous particle if R/r = > 10^9?
> A. CERN=3Fs solution: N = (R/r)^2 = 10^18. > B. My solution: The Earth has its own gravity field. Consequently, > the > trajectory of a particle between collisions will not be straight > line, > but curved to the center of attraction. As a result the dangerous > particle will constantly drift to the center of the Earth. As a > result > the dangerous particle will ruin about N/n Earth=3Fs protons, where: > N =3F the total number of Earth=3Fs protons; n =3F the number of created > dangerous particles.
> Dear "Inertial", which solution is correct: mine or CERN=3Fs?
> That was one crude error, made in the CERN=3Fs safety documentation. > I had fount three such errors and one false assertion.
> CERN will kill you if you will not ruin this criminal organization. > Harry, you have only about 20 days to do that and save your and your > children=3Fs lives. > -- > > Are you seriously suggesting that science should be driven by public > > opinion?
> Physicists in their majority are confident that heavy particles, > created at LHC will decay. > That is a crude error.
> LHC can create a particle with the mass by 10 000 times greater than > the mass of proton.
> To imagine this, compare the masses of a human and of a railway train.
> Imagine the situation if biologists would make a creature with the > mass of railway train, but having the human size. What will happen to > you if this creature would seat at the roof of your house, exactly > over you? Any roof will be broken and you would be smashed into a > thin > film and pushed deep into the ground.
> Now imagine a proton, as soap bubble, and a liquid drop of the same > size. > What will happen to protons, if the bubble has a field, attracting > protons? > Protons would be ruined and their remnants would condense onto the > drop.
> Particle physicists have no such imagination. Those idiots think that > proton consists from three point-like quarks. In fact proton is > composed from some continuous substance, rotating with relativistic > velocity. This rotating substance creates three mixed electro- > magneto- > weak poles: u, u, d. At strong magnetic field this three-pole > construction can be ruined, and the two-pole construction can be > created. This process is accompanied by ejection of positron.
> There are two independent math proves that this reconstruction can be > performed at energies about 0,25 TeV per colliding particle, if the > magnetic moment of resulting two-pole particle is the same as the > magnetic moment of proton. If its value is different, then the needed > energy would also be different.
> Official science is corrupted and rotten organism. It will never > approve the idea, created at the camp of independent researchers. > Official science would better explode the Earth, than say that > magnetic holes are possible and that LHC is deadly dangerous for our > civilization. That is why the official science is criminal now. So, > do > not think that CERN would stop the LHC. CERN will kill us all with > probability about 50% > --
> Note 2: > The time needed the microscopic black hole capture the whole Earth is > mach greater than million years. Consequently, they are safe for now > living people on the Earth. > The time needed the magnetic hole capture the whole Earth is about > 1000 seconds. Consequently, magnetic holes can explode the Earth and > Solar system.
> Note 3: > We know two types of explosions chemical and nuclear. > Astronomers see the third type of explosions =3F collaptical. > At nuclear explosion only few thousand=3Fs parts of explosive rest > energy is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of > fragments. > At some stellar collaptical explosions about a half of rest energy of > the star is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of > the rejected stellar shell. > What type of collaptical explosions do astronomers observe: > gravitational into black hole or magnetic into magnetic hole? > Is it possible to switch the magnetic collapse at collider? > My answers: The observed collapses are magnetic ones. Magnetic > collapse can be switched on by powerful colliders.
> LHC will be switched on in the mead-November; the first collisions > are > waited in a few weeks later. Do we survive or do we start into outer > space?
> Dear physicists, you again and again repeat the biggest error of > Stephen Hawking. > In the CERN's article =3FThe safety of the LHC=3F > http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.html you can find a > dozen of comparisons with cosmic rays.
> Hawking: "The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on. > The > LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy occur > millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing > terrible > happens."
> This error will cost us the life of our Civilization.
> The biggest error is in the comparison of A and B. > A. Collisions of protons at LHC; > B. Collisions of cosmic protons with atmospheric protons.
> Similarity: Energies in A and B are sufficient in order to make > microscopic magnetic holes.
> Difference: Velocities of created holes relatively surrounding matter > are drastically great. > A. Magnetic holes, made on LHC, can have very small velocities. > B. According to conservation law of 4-momentum, cosmic holes have > relativistic velocities.
> Result: > A. LHC=3Fs holes capture slowly moving particles and grow. The bigger > hole becomes =3F the bigger its rate of growth. > B. Atmosphere particles move relatively holes with relativistic > velocities and, correspondingly, they have TeV kinetic energy, > relatively holes. As a result, magnetic holes evaporate immediately. > Such collisions lead to creation of showers of secondary particles. > Physicists observe such showers.
> Analogy: > Let=3Fs compare the behavior of =3Fnuclear quasi-hole=3F with the behavior > of magnetic hole. Let=3Fs investigate two cases:
> A. Bombarding particles are neutrons, having the kinetic energies, > equal to several in eV. > B. Bombarding neutrons have kinetic energies, equal to several TeV.
"Magnetic" <magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote in message
news:8fa443ba-5cd2-4143-ae14-561db75a26a3@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... I wrote the letters to President of EU, to President of USA... But with great probability their secretaries will drop my letters into rubbish. So, if you do not want to play in Russian Roulette, compose your own letter or agree with mine.
Dear President!
I am the author of the theory of magnetic hole. According to this theory magnetic holes can be created soon at the Large Hadron Collider. That will lead to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth’s shell into outer space.
I give the following probabilities: A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV; B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not happen; C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen. 30% I leave to my mistake.
Why is such confidence?
Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole: GMm / r = mc^2 / 2; pB = mc^2.
It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is reached at the energies, achievable in modern colliders, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html There are many arguments in favor the fact that magnetic holes exist, and astronomers see them, but call them on the error as black holes, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html It was found several crude errors and criminal lies in the assessment documents about the safety of LHC, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html
The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters. --
> > According to Russian online “opinion poll” at November 6, 2009, 52% of > > respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat. > > But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime > > experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now! > So you think some country will bomb the LHC before it can get'm?
To bomb the LHC now is better, than LHS destroy the Earth. CERN physicists do not want to listen about magnetic hole. They are potential killers of our planet. CERN physicists must be put into prison now; - otherwise they kill all of us.
The rate of MH’s growth is not known exactly. Magnetic Hole can destroy the Earth in the period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days. If the second is correct, then you will wish to bomb the LHC yourself. But then it would not save you already. Because Magnetic Holes would already grow inside the Earth.
I repeat: the probability of Earth explosion, caused by LHC, is about 50 %.
-- Listen, “Inertial”.
You did not understand what magnetic hole is. It is quite had. But you can try if I am a liar or a stupid boy by solving two my simple problems.
1. Let the length of free path of a particle is equal to 1 meter, r = 1 m. Let the radius of the object is equal to 1000 meters, R = 1000 m. How many collisions will undergo the particle in order to exit the object?
Solution. R/r = 1000. N = (R/r)^2 = 1 000 000.
2. How many Earth’s protons will ruin the dangerous particle if R/r = 10^9?
A. CERN’s solution: N = (R/r)^2 = 10^18. B. My solution: The Earth has its own gravity field. Consequently, the trajectory of a particle between collisions will not be straight line, but curved to the center of attraction. As a result the dangerous particle will constantly drift to the center of the Earth. As a result the dangerous particle will ruin about N/n Earth’s protons, where: N – the total number of Earth’s protons; n – the number of created dangerous particles.
Dear "Inertial", which solution is correct: mine or CERN’s?
That was one crude error, made in the CERN’s safety documentation. I had fount three such errors and one false assertion.
CERN will kill you if you will not ruin this criminal organization. Harry, you have only about 20 days to do that and save your and your children’s lives. --
> Are you seriously suggesting that science should be driven by public > opinion?
Physicists in their majority are confident that heavy particles, created at LHC will decay. That is a crude error.
LHC can create a particle with the mass by 10 000 times greater than the mass of proton.
To imagine this, compare the masses of a human and of a railway train.
Imagine the situation if biologists would make a creature with the mass of railway train, but having the human size. What will happen to you if this creature would seat at the roof of your house, exactly over you? Any roof will be broken and you would be smashed into a thin film and pushed deep into the ground.
Now imagine a proton, as soap bubble, and a liquid drop of the same size. What will happen to protons, if the bubble has a field, attracting protons? Protons would be ruined and their remnants would condense onto the drop.
Particle physicists have no such imagination. Those idiots think that proton consists from three point-like quarks. In fact proton is composed from some continuous substance, rotating with relativistic velocity. This rotating substance creates three mixed electro- magneto- weak poles: u, u, d. At strong magnetic field this three-pole construction can be ruined, and the two-pole construction can be created. This process is accompanied by ejection of positron.
There are two independent math proves that this reconstruction can be performed at energies about 0,25 TeV per colliding particle, if the magnetic moment of resulting two-pole particle is the same as the magnetic moment of proton. If its value is different, then the needed energy would also be different.
Official science is corrupted and rotten organism. It will never approve the idea, created at the camp of independent researchers. Official science would better explode the Earth, than say that magnetic holes are possible and that LHC is deadly dangerous for our civilization. That is why the official science is criminal now. So, do not think that CERN would stop the LHC. CERN will kill us all with probability about 50% --
Note 2: The time needed the microscopic black hole capture the whole Earth is mach greater than million years. Consequently, they are safe for now living people on the Earth. The time needed the magnetic hole capture the whole Earth is about 1000 seconds. Consequently, magnetic holes can explode the Earth and Solar system.
Note 3: We know two types of explosions chemical and nuclear. Astronomers see the third type of explosions – collaptical. At nuclear explosion only few thousand’s parts of explosive rest energy is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of fragments. At some stellar collaptical explosions about a half of rest energy of the star is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of the rejected stellar shell. What type of collaptical explosions do astronomers observe: gravitational into black hole or magnetic into magnetic hole? Is it possible to switch the magnetic collapse at collider? My answers: The observed collapses are magnetic ones. Magnetic collapse can be switched on by powerful colliders.
LHC will be switched on in the mead-November; the first collisions are waited in a few weeks later. Do we survive or do we start into outer space?
Dear physicists, you again and again repeat the biggest error of Stephen Hawking. In the CERN's article “The safety of the LHC” http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.html you can find a dozen of comparisons with cosmic rays.
Hawking: "The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on. The LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy occur millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing terrible happens."
This error will cost us the life of our Civilization.
The biggest error is in the comparison of A and B. A. Collisions of protons at LHC; B. Collisions of cosmic protons with atmospheric protons.
Similarity: Energies in A and B are sufficient in order to make microscopic magnetic holes.
Difference: Velocities of created holes relatively surrounding matter are drastically great. A. Magnetic holes, made on LHC, can have very small velocities. B. According to conservation law of 4-momentum, cosmic holes have relativistic velocities.
Result: A. LHC’s holes capture slowly moving particles and grow. The bigger hole becomes – the bigger its rate of growth. B. Atmosphere particles move relatively holes with relativistic velocities and, correspondingly, they have TeV kinetic energy, relatively holes. As a result, magnetic holes evaporate immediately. Such collisions lead to creation of showers of secondary particles. Physicists observe such showers.
Analogy: Let’s compare the behavior of “nuclear quasi-hole” with the behavior of magnetic hole. Let’s investigate two cases:
A. Bombarding particles are neutrons, having the kinetic energies, equal to several in eV. B. Bombarding neutrons have kinetic energies, equal to several TeV.
B. Evaporation. TeV-energy neutrons will ruin the nucleus in the backward order in crude approximation.
Nuclear collapse is impossible because the repulsive electrostatic forces of protons. That is way, I named nucleus by “nuclear quasi- holes”. Magnetic collapse has no limit. Magnetic hole will grow till there is the
> "Magnetic" <magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote in message
> news:8fa443ba-5cd2-4143-ae14-561db75a26a3@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > I wrote the letters to President of EU, to President of USA... > But with great probability their secretaries will drop my letters into > rubbish. > So, if you do not want to play in Russian Roulette, compose your own > letter or agree with mine.
> Dear President!
> I am the author of the theory of magnetic hole. According to this > theory magnetic holes can be created soon at the Large Hadron > Collider. That will lead to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
> November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large > Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV > will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies > of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to > stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth’s shell into outer > space.
> I give the following probabilities: > A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV; > B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not > happen; > C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen. > 30% I leave to my mistake.
> Why is such confidence?
> Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole: > GMm / r = mc^2 / 2; > pB = mc^2.
> It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is > reached at the energies, achievable in modern colliders,http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html > There are many arguments in favor the fact that magnetic holes exist, > and astronomers see them, but call them on the error as black holes,http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html > It was found several crude errors and criminal lies in the assessment > documents about the safety of LHC,http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html
> The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small > region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is > about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters. > --
> > > According to Russian online “opinion poll” at November 6, 2009, 52% of > > > respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat. > > > But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime > > > experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now! > > So you think some country will bomb the LHC before it can get'm?
> To bomb the LHC now is better, than LHS destroy the Earth. CERN > physicists do not want to listen about magnetic hole. They are > potential killers of our planet. CERN physicists must be put into > prison now; - otherwise they kill all of us.
> The rate of MH’s growth is not known exactly. Magnetic Hole can > destroy the Earth in the period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days. If > the > second is correct, then you will wish to bomb the LHC yourself. But > then it would not save you already. Because Magnetic Holes would > already grow inside the Earth.
> I repeat: the probability of Earth explosion, caused by LHC, is about > 50 %.
> -- > Listen, “Inertial”.
> You did not understand what magnetic hole is. It is quite had. > But you can try if I am a liar or a stupid boy by solving two my > simple problems.
> 1. Let the length of free path of a particle is equal to 1 meter, r = > 1 m. > Let the radius of the object is equal to 1000 meters, R = 1000 m. > How many collisions will undergo the particle in order to exit the > object?
> Solution. R/r = 1000. N = (R/r)^2 = 1 000 000.
> 2. How many Earth’s protons will ruin the dangerous particle if R/r = > 10^9?
> A. CERN’s solution: N = (R/r)^2 = 10^18. > B. My solution: The Earth has its own gravity field. Consequently, > the > trajectory of a particle between collisions will not be straight > line, > but curved to the center of attraction. As a result the dangerous > particle will constantly drift to the center of the Earth. As a > result > the dangerous particle will ruin about N/n Earth’s protons, where: > N – the total number of Earth’s protons; n – the number of created > dangerous particles.
> Dear "Inertial", which solution is correct: mine or CERN’s?
> That was one crude error, made in the CERN’s safety documentation. > I had fount three such errors and one false assertion.
> CERN will kill you if you will not ruin this criminal organization. > Harry, you have only about 20 days to do that and save your and your > children’s lives. > --
> > Are you seriously suggesting that science should be driven by public > > opinion?
> Physicists in their majority are confident that heavy particles, > created at LHC will decay. > That is a crude error.
> LHC can create a particle with the mass by 10 000 times greater than > the mass of proton.
> To imagine this, compare the masses of a human and of a railway train.
> Imagine the situation if biologists would make a creature with the > mass of railway train, but having the human size. What will happen to > you if this creature would seat at the roof of your house, exactly > over you? Any roof will be broken and you would be smashed into a > thin > film and pushed deep into the ground.
> Now imagine a proton, as soap bubble, and a liquid drop of the same > size. > What will happen to protons, if the bubble has a field, attracting > protons? > Protons would be ruined and their remnants would condense onto the > drop.
> Particle physicists have no such imagination. Those idiots think that > proton consists from three point-like quarks. In fact proton is > composed from some continuous substance, rotating with relativistic > velocity. This rotating substance creates three mixed electro- > magneto- > weak poles: u, u, d. At strong magnetic field this three-pole > construction can be ruined, and the two-pole construction can be > created. This process is accompanied by ejection of positron.
> There are two independent math proves that this reconstruction can be > performed at energies about 0,25 TeV per colliding particle, if the > magnetic moment of resulting two-pole particle is the same as the > magnetic moment of proton. If its value is different, then the needed > energy would also be different.
> Official science is corrupted and rotten organism. It will never > approve the idea, created at the camp of independent researchers. > Official science would better explode the Earth, than say that > magnetic holes are possible and that LHC is deadly dangerous for our > civilization. That is why the official science is criminal now. So, > do > not think that CERN would stop the LHC. CERN will kill us all with > probability about 50% > --
> Note 2: > The time needed the microscopic black hole capture the whole Earth is > mach greater than million years. Consequently, they are safe for now > living people on the Earth. > The time needed the magnetic hole capture the whole Earth is about > 1000 seconds. Consequently, magnetic holes can explode the Earth and > Solar system.
> Note 3: > We know two types of explosions chemical and nuclear. > Astronomers see the third type of explosions – collaptical. > At nuclear explosion only few thousand’s parts of explosive rest > energy is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of > fragments. > At some stellar collaptical explosions about a half of rest energy of > the star is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of > the rejected stellar shell. > What type of collaptical explosions do astronomers observe: > gravitational into black hole or magnetic into magnetic hole? > Is it possible to switch the magnetic collapse at collider? > My answers: The observed collapses are magnetic ones. Magnetic > collapse can be switched on by powerful colliders.
> LHC will be switched on in the mead-November; the first collisions > are > waited in a few weeks later. Do we survive or do we start into outer > space?
> Dear physicists, you again and again repeat the biggest error of > Stephen Hawking. > In the CERN's article “The safety of the LHC”http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.htmlyou can find a > dozen of comparisons with cosmic rays.
> Hawking: "The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on. > The > LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy occur > millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing > terrible > happens."
> This error will cost us the life of our Civilization.
> The biggest error is in the comparison of A and B. > A. Collisions of protons at LHC; > B. Collisions of cosmic protons with atmospheric protons.
> Similarity: Energies in A and B are sufficient in order to make > microscopic magnetic holes.
> Difference: Velocities of created holes relatively surrounding matter > are drastically great. > A. Magnetic holes, made on LHC, can have very small velocities. > B. According to conservation law of 4-momentum, cosmic holes have > relativistic velocities.
> Result: > A. LHC’s holes capture slowly moving particles and grow. The bigger > hole becomes – the bigger its rate of growth. > B. Atmosphere particles move relatively holes with relativistic > velocities and, correspondingly, they have TeV kinetic energy, > relatively holes. As a result, magnetic holes evaporate immediately. > Such collisions lead to creation of showers of secondary particles. > Physicists observe such showers.
> Analogy: > Let’s compare the behavior of “nuclear quasi-hole” with the behavior > of magnetic hole. Let’s investigate two cases:
> A. Bombarding particles are neutrons, having the kinetic energies, > equal to several in eV. > B. Bombarding neutrons have kinetic energies, equal to several TeV.
> On Nov 10, 6:33 am, "Ernie69" <eprimeau6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This proves my hairloss method works. Ernie
> > "Magnetic" <magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote in message
> >news:8fa443ba-5cd2-4143-ae14-561db75a26a3@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > > I wrote the letters to President of EU, to President of USA... > > But with great probability their secretaries will drop my letters into > > rubbish. > > So, if you do not want to play in Russian Roulette, compose your own > > letter or agree with mine.
> > Dear President!
> > I am the author of the theory of magnetic hole. According to this > > theory magnetic holes can be created soon at the Large Hadron > > Collider. That will lead to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
> > November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large > > Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV > > will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies > > of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to > > stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth’s shell into outer > > space.
> > I give the following probabilities: > > A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV; > > B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not > > happen; > > C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen. > > 30% I leave to my mistake.
> > Why is such confidence?
> > Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole: > > GMm / r = mc^2 / 2; > > pB = mc^2.
> > It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is > > reached at the energies, achievable in modern colliders,http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html > > There are many arguments in favor the fact that magnetic holes exist, > > and astronomers see them, but call them on the error as black holes,http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html > > It was found several crude errors and criminal lies in the assessment > > documents about the safety of LHC,http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html
> > The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small > > region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is > > about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters. > > --
> > > > According to Russian online “opinion poll” at November 6, 2009, 52% of > > > > respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat. > > > > But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime > > > > experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now! > > > So you think some country will bomb the LHC before it can get'm?
> > To bomb the LHC now is better, than LHS destroy the Earth. CERN > > physicists do not want to listen about magnetic hole. They are > > potential killers of our planet. CERN physicists must be put into > > prison now; - otherwise they kill all of us.
> > The rate of MH’s growth is not known exactly. Magnetic Hole can > > destroy the Earth in the period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days. If > > the > > second is correct, then you will wish to bomb the LHC yourself. But > > then it would not save you already. Because Magnetic Holes would > > already grow inside the Earth.
> > I repeat: the probability of Earth explosion, caused by LHC, is about > > 50 %.
> > -- > > Listen, “Inertial”.
> > You did not understand what magnetic hole is. It is quite had. > > But you can try if I am a liar or a stupid boy by solving two my > > simple problems.
> > 1. Let the length of free path of a particle is equal to 1 meter, r = > > 1 m. > > Let the radius of the object is equal to 1000 meters, R = 1000 m. > > How many collisions will undergo the particle in order to exit the > > object?
> > 2. How many Earth’s protons will ruin the dangerous particle if R/r = > > 10^9?
> > A. CERN’s solution: N = (R/r)^2 = 10^18. > > B. My solution: The Earth has its own gravity field. Consequently, > > the > > trajectory of a particle between collisions will not be straight > > line, > > but curved to the center of attraction. As a result the dangerous > > particle will constantly drift to the center of the Earth. As a > > result > > the dangerous particle will ruin about N/n Earth’s protons, where: > > N – the total number of Earth’s protons; n – the number of created > > dangerous particles.
> > Dear "Inertial", which solution is correct: mine or CERN’s?
> > That was one crude error, made in the CERN’s safety documentation. > > I had fount three such errors and one false assertion.
> > CERN will kill you if you will not ruin this criminal organization. > > Harry, you have only about 20 days to do that and save your and your > > children’s lives. > > --
> > > Are you seriously suggesting that science should be driven by public > > > opinion?
> > Physicists in their majority are confident that heavy particles, > > created at LHC will decay. > > That is a crude error.
> > LHC can create a particle with the mass by 10 000 times greater than > > the mass of proton.
> > To imagine this, compare the masses of a human and of a railway train.
> > Imagine the situation if biologists would make a creature with the > > mass of railway train, but having the human size. What will happen to > > you if this creature would seat at the roof of your house, exactly > > over you? Any roof will be broken and you would be smashed into a > > thin > > film and pushed deep into the ground.
> > Now imagine a proton, as soap bubble, and a liquid drop of the same > > size. > > What will happen to protons, if the bubble has a field, attracting > > protons? > > Protons would be ruined and their remnants would condense onto the > > drop.
> > Particle physicists have no such imagination. Those idiots think that > > proton consists from three point-like quarks. In fact proton is > > composed from some continuous substance, rotating with relativistic > > velocity. This rotating substance creates three mixed electro- > > magneto- > > weak poles: u, u, d. At strong magnetic field this three-pole > > construction can be ruined, and the two-pole construction can be > > created. This process is accompanied by ejection of positron.
> > There are two independent math proves that this reconstruction can be > > performed at energies about 0,25 TeV per colliding particle, if the > > magnetic moment of resulting two-pole particle is the same as the > > magnetic moment of proton. If its value is different, then the needed > > energy would also be different.
> > Official science is corrupted and rotten organism. It will never > > approve the idea, created at the camp of independent researchers. > > Official science would better explode the Earth, than say that > > magnetic holes are possible and that LHC is deadly dangerous for our > > civilization. That is why the official science is criminal now. So, > > do > > not think that CERN would stop the LHC. CERN will kill us all with > > probability about 50% > > --
> > Note 2: > > The time needed the microscopic black hole capture the whole Earth is > > mach greater than million years. Consequently, they are safe for now > > living people on the Earth. > > The time needed the magnetic hole capture the whole Earth is about > > 1000 seconds. Consequently, magnetic holes can explode the Earth and > > Solar system.
> > Note 3: > > We know two types of explosions chemical and nuclear. > > Astronomers see the third type of explosions – collaptical. > > At nuclear explosion only few thousand’s parts of explosive rest > > energy is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of > > fragments. > > At some stellar collaptical explosions about a half of rest energy of > > the star is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of > > the rejected stellar shell. > > What type of collaptical explosions do astronomers observe: > > gravitational into black hole or magnetic into magnetic hole? > > Is it possible to switch the magnetic collapse at collider? > > My answers: The observed collapses are magnetic ones. Magnetic > > collapse can be switched on by powerful colliders.
> > LHC will be switched on in the mead-November; the first collisions > > are > > waited in a few weeks later. Do we survive or do we start into outer > > space?
> > Dear physicists, you again and again repeat the biggest error of > > Stephen Hawking. > > In the CERN's article “The safety of the LHC”http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.htmlyoucan find a > > dozen of comparisons with cosmic rays.
> > Hawking: "The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on. > > The > > LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy occur > > millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing > > terrible > > happens."
> > This error will cost us the life of our Civilization.
> > The biggest error is in the comparison of A and B. > > A. Collisions of protons at LHC; > > B. Collisions of cosmic protons with atmospheric protons.
> > Similarity: Energies in A and B are sufficient in order to make > > microscopic magnetic holes.
> > Difference: Velocities of created holes relatively surrounding matter > > are drastically great. > > A. Magnetic holes, made on LHC, can have very small velocities. > > B. According to conservation law of 4-momentum, cosmic holes have > > relativistic velocities.
> > Result: > > A. LHC’s holes capture slowly moving particles and grow. The bigger > > hole becomes – the bigger its rate of growth. > > B. Atmosphere particles move relatively holes with relativistic > > velocities and, correspondingly, they have TeV kinetic energy, > > relatively holes. As a result, magnetic holes evaporate immediately. > > Such collisions lead to creation of showers of secondary particles. > > Physicists observe such showers.
> I wrote the letters to President of EU, to President of USA... > But with great probability their secretaries will drop my letters into > rubbish. > So, if you do not want to play in Russian Roulette, compose your own > letter or agree with mine.
> Dear President!
> I am the author of the theory of magnetic hole. According to this > theory magnetic holes can be created soon at the Large Hadron > Collider. That will lead to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
> November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large > Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV > will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies > of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to > stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth’s shell into outer > space.
> I give the following probabilities: > A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV; > B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not > happen; > C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen. > 30% I leave to my mistake.
> Why is such confidence?
> Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole: > GMm / r = mc^2 / 2; > pB = mc^2.
> It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is > reached at the energies, achievable in modern colliders,http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html > There are many arguments in favor the fact that magnetic holes exist, > and astronomers see them, but call them on the error as black holes,http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html > It was found several crude errors and criminal lies in the assessment > documents about the safety of LHC,http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html
> The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small > region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is > about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters. > --
> > > According to Russian online “opinion poll” at November 6, 2009, 52% of > > > respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat. > > > But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime > > > experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now! > > So you think some country will bomb the LHC before it can get'm?
> To bomb the LHC now is better, than LHS destroy the Earth. CERN > physicists do not want to listen about magnetic hole. They are > potential killers of our planet. CERN physicists must be put into > prison now; - otherwise they kill all of us.
> The rate of MH’s growth is not known exactly. Magnetic Hole can > destroy the Earth in the period from 1000 seconds to 1000 days. If > the > second is correct, then you will wish to bomb the LHC yourself. But > then it would not save you already. Because Magnetic Holes would > already grow inside the Earth.
> I repeat: the probability of Earth explosion, caused by LHC, is about > 50 %.
> -- > Listen, “Inertial”.
> You did not understand what magnetic hole is. It is quite had. > But you can try if I am a liar or a stupid boy by solving two my > simple problems.
> 1. Let the length of free path of a particle is equal to 1 meter, r = > 1 m. > Let the radius of the object is equal to 1000 meters, R = 1000 m. > How many collisions will undergo the particle in order to exit the > object?
> Solution. R/r = 1000. N = (R/r)^2 = 1 000 000.
> 2. How many Earth’s protons will ruin the dangerous particle if R/r = > 10^9?
> A. CERN’s solution: N = (R/r)^2 = 10^18. > B. My solution: The Earth has its own gravity field. Consequently, > the > trajectory of a particle between collisions will not be straight > line, > but curved to the center of attraction. As a result the dangerous > particle will constantly drift to the center of the Earth. As a > result > the dangerous particle will ruin about N/n Earth’s protons, where: > N – the total number of Earth’s protons; n – the number of created > dangerous particles.
> Dear "Inertial", which solution is correct: mine or CERN’s?
> That was one crude error, made in the CERN’s safety documentation. > I had fount three such errors and one false assertion.
> CERN will kill you if you will not ruin this criminal organization. > Harry, you have only about 20 days to do that and save your and your > children’s lives. > --
> > Are you seriously suggesting that science should be driven by public > > opinion?
> Physicists in their majority are confident that heavy particles, > created at LHC will decay. > That is a crude error.
> LHC can create a particle with the mass by 10 000 times greater than > the mass of proton.
> To imagine this, compare the masses of a human and of a railway train.
> Imagine the situation if biologists would make a creature with the > mass of railway train, but having the human size. What will happen to > you if this creature would seat at the roof of your house, exactly > over you? Any roof will be broken and you would be smashed into a > thin > film and pushed deep into the ground.
> Now imagine a proton, as soap bubble, and a liquid drop of the same > size. > What will happen to protons, if the bubble has a field, attracting > protons? > Protons would be ruined and their remnants would condense onto the > drop.
> Particle physicists have no such imagination. Those idiots think that > proton consists from three point-like quarks. In fact proton is > composed from some continuous substance, rotating with relativistic > velocity. This rotating substance creates three mixed electro- > magneto- > weak poles: u, u, d. At strong magnetic field this three-pole > construction can be ruined, and the two-pole construction can be > created. This process is accompanied by ejection of positron.
> There are two independent math proves that this reconstruction can be > performed at energies about 0,25 TeV per colliding particle, if the > magnetic moment of resulting two-pole particle is the same as the > magnetic moment of proton. If its value is different, then the needed > energy would also be different.
> Official science is corrupted and rotten organism. It will never > approve the idea, created at the camp of independent researchers. > Official science would better explode the Earth, than say that > magnetic holes are possible and that LHC is deadly dangerous for our > civilization. That is why the official science is criminal now. So, > do > not think that CERN would stop the LHC. CERN will kill us all with > probability about 50% > --
> Note 2: > The time needed the microscopic black hole capture the whole Earth is > mach greater than million years. Consequently, they are safe for now > living people on the Earth. > The time needed the magnetic hole capture the whole Earth is about > 1000 seconds. Consequently, magnetic holes can explode the Earth and > Solar system.
> Note 3: > We know two types of explosions chemical and nuclear. > Astronomers see the third type of explosions – collaptical. > At nuclear explosion only few thousand’s parts of explosive rest > energy is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of > fragments. > At some stellar collaptical explosions about a half of rest energy of > the star is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of > the rejected stellar shell. > What type of collaptical explosions do astronomers observe: > gravitational into black hole or magnetic into magnetic hole? > Is it possible to switch the magnetic collapse at collider? > My answers: The observed collapses are magnetic ones. Magnetic > collapse can be switched on by powerful colliders.
> LHC will be switched on in the mead-November; the first collisions > are > waited in a few weeks later. Do we survive or do we start into outer > space?
> Dear physicists, you again and again repeat the biggest error of > Stephen Hawking. > In the CERN's article “The safety of the LHC”http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.htmlyou can find a > dozen of comparisons with cosmic rays.
> Hawking: "The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on. > The > LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy occur > millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing > terrible > happens."
> This error will cost us the life of our Civilization.
> The biggest error is in the comparison of A and B. > A. Collisions of protons at LHC; > B. Collisions of cosmic protons with atmospheric protons.
> Similarity: Energies in A and B are sufficient in order to make > microscopic magnetic holes.
> Difference: Velocities of created holes relatively surrounding matter > are drastically great. > A. Magnetic holes, made on LHC, can have very small velocities. > B. According to conservation law of 4-momentum, cosmic holes have > relativistic velocities.
> Result: > A. LHC’s holes capture slowly moving particles and grow. The bigger > hole becomes – the bigger its rate of growth. > B. Atmosphere particles move relatively holes with relativistic > velocities and, correspondingly, they have TeV kinetic energy, > relatively holes. As a result, magnetic holes evaporate immediately. > Such collisions lead to creation of showers of secondary particles. > Physicists observe such showers.
> Analogy: > Let’s compare the behavior of “nuclear quasi-hole” with the behavior > of magnetic hole. Let’s investigate two cases:
> A. Bombarding particles are neutrons, having the kinetic energies, > equal to several in eV. > B. Bombarding neutrons have kinetic energies, equal to several TeV.
What happened with Phaeton? Where dozens of meteorites with traces of life come from? Were there thousands of physicists, thinking that the man is not able to explode his own planet? Will our bodies will be packet into comets and sent to other star systems as seeds of new life? What a crafty gene govern by you to hasten our biospheres suicidal reproduction? Why this crafty gene forbid discussing about Phaeton, strange meteorites, the possibility of biospheres suicidal reproduction. The answer: Civilizations, which have no such gene do not able to reproduce, as a result, - impossible. Consequently, this congenital gene must be extremely strong. Who will win: our mind or this crafty gene of biospheres reproduction?
I’ll put probabilities grounded on my intuition.
Where is Phaeton? 1. It was not formed – 1%. 2. It was ruined by asteroid or something of that kind - 4%. 3. It was exploded by its civilization – 90%. 4. Something else – 5%.
If it was exploded by its civilization, then we must see some evidences. Yes, there are plenty of them: strange meteorites with traces of life; angular form of asteroids; chemical composition of asteroids say that had formed inside the planet.
What device did use the Phaeton’s civilization in order to explode their planet?
1. Nuclear bomb in “necessary” place – 1% 2. Collider like our LHC – 50% 3. Other devices – 49%
As a result we can see that probability, grounded on the “Phaeton argument” gives 0.9*0.5=0.45=45%.
I have dozens of arguments proving the extreme danger of LHC. There are also two absolutely independent math deductions, giving almost the same result. According to this result magnetic hole can be created at LHC energies.
According to this theory magnetic holes can be created soon at the Large Hadron Collider. That will lead to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth's shell into outer space.
I give the following probabilities:
A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV; B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not happen; C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen. 30% I leave to my mistake.
Why is such confidence?
Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole: GMm / r = mc^2 / 2; pB = mc^2.
It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is reached at the energies, achievable in modern colliders, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html
There are many arguments in favor the fact that magnetic holes exist, and astronomers see them, but call them on the error as black holes, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html
The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region's diameter is about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters.
|
