Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

@@ Iran Policy Committee @@

0 views

Skip to first unread message

Arash

unread,

May 27, 2005, 12:09:33 AM5/27/05

Dissident Voice
May 19, 2005

Iran Policy Committee:

Pentagon Mouthpiece, Israeli Ally, MEK Supporter

By John Stanton

The Iran Policy Committee (IPC) has a website up and running at
http://www.iranpolicycommittee.org [1] The IPC made the news in February of 2005 when it
released a report titled "US Options for Iran". In that report, the IPC recommended that a
terrorist group known as the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (http://www.iran-interlink.org
, http://www.irandidban.com) be removed from the US government’s hit list
(http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/37191.htm).

The authors of the IPC report equate the terrorist MEK with the African National Congress
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_National_Congress) that fought long and hard against
the despicable all-white South African regime and its U.S. supporters so many years ago.
Of course, the implication here is that the MEK will somehow produce a Nelson Mandela
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Mandela), or at least is on the same playing field as
Mandela’s group was.

Those two wacky thoughts should be enough to dismiss the eleven IPC principals, their
mission and their clumsy report as nonsense. But here inside the Washington, DC Beltway,
it’s never wise to dismiss ignorance until performing background checks on the individuals
and their affiliations. The record shows that the IPC operates in very close proximity to
the U.S. intelligence community, has the support of 150 members in the U.S. Congress, and
is linked to individuals/groups who successfully lied and led the U.S. into another
Vietnam-like war, and whose primary purpose is the creation of a U.S. empire that controls
the world’s resources and protects a greater Israel. Crazy is selling these days and the
loonies are in charge.

The IPC is supported by the neocon all-stars that we’ve come to know and love such as Doug
Feith, Frank Gaffney, Mike Ledeen, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Don Rumsfeld, Condi
Rice, et al.

But these first benchers are running out of political muscle as their war in Iraq
continues to drain the resources of the American people on all political, economic and
military fronts. What’s worse, perhaps, is their “with us or against us” mentality that
has caused new political and economic alliances to form (example: South
America-China-Iran) and that has accelerated both conventional and nuclear arms races.

Having failed on so many fronts, they recognize that to get the U.S. into Iran, some new
faces are needed and that’s where the IPC back benchers are critical to the forthcoming
anti-Iranian/Persian propaganda operations.
The IPC is linked through its purpose and people to the Coalition for a Democratic Iran
(http://rightweb.irc-online.org/org/cdi.php) and the MEK, the Washington PAC, JINSA
(http://rightweb.irc-online.org/org/jinsa.php), AIPAC
(http://rightweb.irc-online.org/org/aipac.php), the Washington Institute for Near East
Policy (http://rightweb.irc-online.org/org/winep.php), AEI
(http://rightweb.irc-online.org/org/aei.php), Middle East Forum
(http://rightweb.irc-online.org/org/mef.php), the DOD
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Defense), the Center for Security Policy
(http://rightweb.irc-online.org/org/csp.php), and all the major U.S. intelligence agencies
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Intelligence_Agency ;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Intelligence_Agency ;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Agency ;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Intelligence_Council).

IPC members are primarily defense & security contractors/consultants and would benefit
financially from a war with Iran.

FOX This!

Anyone who can tolerate FOX News -- the electronic equivalent of Reverend Moon’s
Washington Times--on a regular basis will recognize these IPC members: Lieutenant General
Thomas McInerney(http://www.netstarsys.com/family/mcinerney.html); formerly of the
Business Executives for National Security and member of the Center for Security Policy;
Major General Paul Vallely
(http://www.jerusalemsummit.org/eng/speakers_2004/vallely_short.php); Captain Chuck Nash
(http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Charles_T._Nash); and Lieutenant Colonel
William (Bill) Cowan (http://www.wvc3.com/billcowan.cfm). These four folks are frequently
seen and heard discussing military matters on FOX.

Other IPC heavy hitters include Raymond Tanter (http://www.sw-asia.com/People/Bio912.htm),
a former staffer at the National Security Council and current member of the Committee for
the Present Danger (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_on_the_Present_Danger) and the
Washington Center for Near East Policy; Clare Lopez
(http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Clare_M._Lopez) a former CIA analyst; and Jim
Atkins, former U.S. President Richard Nixon’s ambassador to Saudi Arabia, who is known in
some circles as “the westerner who knows the most about the Middle East...”

The military heavyweight of the IPC is General McInerney. One of the highlights of
McInerney’s military career, besides being a top-notch pilot in Vietnam, was assisting
Alaska in the clean up of the oil spill caused by the Exxon Valdez when it ran aground in
March of 1989. From April to September of that year, McInerney admirably headed the Joint
Task Force Alaska Oil Spill while commander of the Alaskan Air Command (then SECDEF Cheney
argued for a minimalist DOD/federal government role). These days, though, McInerney is
busy promoting the neocon cause and dabbling in a host of money-making and influence
peddling activities.

You can find him -- and fellow IPC cohorts General Vallely, Colonel Cowan and Lopez -- at
conferences like Intelcon 2005 [2] as speakers and members of the Intelcon’s Program
Advisory Group (Mike Ledeen, Frank Gaffney and Daniel Pipes are among them). Former
directors of the NSA, CIA and DIA are featured panelists, along with more, yes more, FOX
News commentators no doubt opining in conference as on the network with all the volume of
an announcer at a Monster Truck bash. Yehoshuah Mizrachi of Operation Shiloh apparently
spoke at Intelcon about handling terror like an Israeli (he equates the Battle of Shiloh
from the U.S .Civil War with 9-11). Finally, the conference program shows that the
standard mix of defense contractors and U.S. government bureaucrats round out Intelcon’s
conferees, along with a few token liberals thrown in for what appears to be some sort of
balance.

Do You Hear What I Hear?

So what are all these IPC characters doing at Intelcon? Well it’s a good place to drum up
business and get nod-and-wink-intel about what’s really going on “over there and with that
contract award.” At the Intelcon blast held this past February, McInerney chaired a panel
on Securing Intelligence Networks. As a director of NetStar Systems, that subject matter
is an important part of his job. According to NetStar’s website, it is “a fast-growing
Virginia corporation with headquarters in Vienna, Virginia. It was founded in 1998 and
most of our employees are cleared at the Top Secret or higher levels. NetStar is growing
rapidly in the Intel and DOD sectors and has provided numerous solutions and staff to many
of the Intelligence agencies in the DC metro area.” Clients include the NSA, CIA, DIA,
FBI, DHS and the Office of Naval Intelligence. NetStar is a member of the National
Military Intelligence Association (NMIA). Most of NetStar’s clients were at Intelcon 2005
including General Jim Williams, USA (Ret.), former director of DIA, and NMIA’s current
director.

With the IPC plugged into U.S. global and domestic intelligence operations, and connected
with neocon/Israeli lobbying activities here in the USA, it’s important to listen to
them—no matter how maniacally they articulate their position. So when McInerney was quoted
by the Washington Times Rowan Scarborough in February of 2005 about the likelihood of an
attack on Iran, one has to wonder how and where he is getting his information as he states
it with an air of complete certainty.

What are we to make of his almost 30 year old assessment of Iranian anti-aircraft
defenses? Is it likely that Iran has done nothing about its defenses since the 1970’s or
does personnel experience mean something else given his contacts in the neocon pipeline,
and U.S./foreign intelligence communities?

“He [Bush] doesn't have any choice [but to attack Iran because] he understands [the
Iranians] are the king of terror right now. They are striving for nuclear weapons that can
get into the hands of terrorists and then it's too late. B-2 stealth bombers, armed with
the huge penetrating bombs commonly called bunker busters, would be able to pierce Iran's
aging air defenses and hit 20 or more sites. They have not updated that very, very old air
defense system. McInerney said that as a colonel in 1977 he went to Iran and conducted a
war exercise against various Iranian targets during the rule of the United States' ally,
the Shah of Iran. They were not very good then, and they have clearly just gotten worse…I
can tell you from my personal experience we would have no problem there".

McInerney’s buddy, Vallely, is of the same mind. According to FOX News, Vallely believes
that “while the United States has the ability to launch a major ground invasion, it wouldn’t
have to…we can take a country down with just our air assets…we don't have to put boots on
the ground all the time if we're after specific targets”.

Did they forget about how difficult Iran could make it for U.S. troops on the ground in
Iraq? What about the impact on the U.S. and world economy?

It is vacuum packed thinking like this that prompted the following Amazon Books review of
McInerney and Vallely’s book "Endgame: Blueprint for Victory in the War on Terror"
(http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0895260662?v=glance). Robert Steele of the
noted Open Source Solutions
(http://www.oss.net/extra/tools/parser/index.cgi?url=/html/parse/index.html) had this to
say:

I finally figured it out. This is a puff piece of, by, and for FOX Cable News viewers.
There are no footnotes in this book. It is a rambling opinion piece. Let us not confuse
rank with brains, or opinions with thought. This is a double-spaced book that could
probably be distilled to 30 pages of core reading, all summed up as 'we're always right,
no matter the cost. This book also adopts the Richard Perle neoconservative game plan of
using terrorism as a pretext to invade Syria and Iran.

The authors -- who demonstrate how far one could get in the Cold War military without
reading or thinking, call this a military assessment. It is not. . . It avoids discussing
Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Central Asia, Muslim Africa, and Muslim Pacifica. This is not
analysis, this is flim-flam. . .This book is a blueprint for a nuclear winter in which
America self-immolates.

We Know Terrorism?

IPC notable Cowan runs a company called wvc3. Among other things, Cowan’s group states
“Talking about terrorists is one thing. Having conducted successful operations against
them in their midst is another. We know terrorism. It’s not something we’ve learned since
9/11. We can speak with absolute authority about how they organize, think, act, and
operate. Programs and operations designed to neutralize them will only be as successful as
the thinking behind them. We provide the bedrock around which sound counterterrorism
initiatives and efforts are based.”

Uh, if that’s so, where were they on 911? What about the MEK?

Anyway, Cowan’s group links to companies like Aegis whose claim is that, “Our management
staff consists of prior U.S. military, police and government personnel. Their many years
of dedicated service provides Aegis MEP with a network of international contacts that
enable us to act anywhere in the world. Our linguists are rigorously tested to ensure
their proficiency in English and their specialty language(s). Our consultants and
operational personnel have extensive international experience and are accustomed to acting
professionally in politically sensitive environments…The projects we complete for our
clients are generally sensitive in nature.”

In sum, they are either guarding people and things, killing/destroying people and things,
or watching and listening to someone on something. Which makes one wonder why resort to
all the self-inflating crypto military/intelligence speak?

MEK: Terrorists Working for America

On April 6, 2005, a number of IPC principals met with elected officials in the U.S.
government. The IPC has the complete account on its website from U.S. Newswire.

Here are some of the highlights:
“The IPC convened on Capitol Hill at the invitation of the Iran Human Rights and Democracy
Caucus of the U.S. House of Representatives. At issue were U.S. policy options for Iran.
In attendance were over 80 members of the Congress and their aides, foreign diplomats,
experts from other think tanks...Co-chairs of the caucus, Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO.)
and Congressman Bob Filner (D-CA), chaired the briefing. Tancredo raised the issue of the
terrorist designation of Iran’s main opposition group, the Mujahedeen e-Khalq organization
and IPC panelists concurred on the need to remove it from the U.S. Foreign Terrorist
Organizations List. Tancredo stated that the MEK was designated not because it was
involved in terrorist activities, but because the Clinton administration sought to curry
favor with the Iranian regime.”

In fact, the MEK did a lot of Saddam Hussein’s dirty work inside Iraq, according to
globalsecurity.org. The MEK assisted Saddam Hussein’s suppression of the 1991 Iraqi Shiite
and Kurdish uprisings and in the 1970s MEK members killed a number of US soldiers and
contractors. Its membership has been steadily falling. “The MEK was allied with the Iraqi
regime and received most of its support from it. MEK members supported the 1979 takeover
of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, in which 52 Americans were held hostage for 444 days.

The MEK assisted the Hussein regime in suppressing opposition within Iraq, and performed
internal security for the Iraqi regime. MEK was founded in the 1960s by a group of
college-educated Iranian leftists opposed to the country’s pro-Western ruler, Shah
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Although the group took part in the 1979 Islamic revolution that
replaced the Shah with a Shiite Islamist regime, MEK’s ideology, a blend of Marxism and
Islamism, put it at odds with the post-revolutionary government. MEK activities have
dropped off in recent years as its membership has dwindled.”

But the future is bright. The MEK has the IPC and its supporters working on its behalf.

* John Stanton is a Virginia Based writer specializing in political & national security
matters. He is the author of "America 2004: A Power But Not Super"
(http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1893302261).

REFERENCES

1) All biographies for the IPC members and the referenced report can be found on the IPC
website.

2) There are far too many websites to reference in the body of the article. You can find
the links to IPC member companies on their website. Intelcon is at
http://www.fbcinc.com/intelcon/organizers.asp . Operation Shiloh is
http://www.opshiloh.com . NetStar is http://www.netstarsys.com . NMIA is at
http://www.nmia.org . Go to the NMIA Awards Citations and you’ll get an idea of some of
the intelligence ops being run in the USA and elsewhere.

Fox News Breaking Point Investigation (April 24, 2005)

Iran: Nuclear Threat
http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/articles/article.php?id=15

http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/d57385407011fb0b?hl=en

http://dissidentvoice.org/May05/Stanton0519.htm

0 new messages