Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

@@ The high price of hounding Iran @@

0 views

Skip to first unread message

Arash

unread,

Sep 30, 2005, 1:46:17 PM9/30/05

Asia Times
September 29, 2005

The high price of hounding Iran

Dr. Kaveh L Afrasiabi

The Middle East powder keg is now one step closer to explosion as a result of the
impending showdown at the United Nations and beyond between Iran and its nuclear
detractors, given the latest resolution of the UN atomic agency finding Iran in
breach of its obligations and non-compliance. But the real question is, can this lead
to anything but a lose-lose situation?

A clue to the inverted, Orwellian universe in which we live: International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA) spokeswoman Melissa Fleming
(http://www.iaea.org/Resources/Journalists/cv_fleming.html / Email:
M.Fleming[AT]iaea.org) has tried to put a positive spin on the said resolution
decried by Iran as "unfair" and "political", by saying that it has "opened a new
window of opportunity" for Tehran.

Yet, from Iran's vantage point, the only window opened by the tough IAEA stance,
ignoring the positive developments in Iran-IAEA cooperation of the past couple of
years, is the window to the inferno of sanctions and international isolation or,
alternatively, coerced submission to the will of Western nuclear haves too immersed
in this bifurcated worldview to respect Iran's right to nuclear technology.

The European Three (EU-3 - France, Germany and Britain) have by all indications
prioritized their transatlantic ties with the U.S. over their relations with Iran,
trying to outdo each other in appeasing the U.S. in its unilateral march toward
anti-Iran sanctions at the UN.

This is precisely where the word "multilateralism" begins to lose some of its luster,
seeing how the collapse of European diplomacy in the cesspool of unilateralism is
nicely covered by the make-believe concerns of top European diplomats over the fate
of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

Make no mistake, Europe is fizzling apart and the panacea of anti-Iranianism throwing
them into the U.S.'s bosom can hardly suffice to glue its structural rifts. For what
else can explain the French turnabout, from a few months ago when President Jacques
Chirac, in a meeting with Iran's nuclear negotiator, Hassan Rowhani, agreed to Iran's
proposal for an IAEA-led system of nuclear verification to satisfy the "objective
guarantees" mentioned in the Paris Agreement, to the present hardline approach devoid
of the slightest flexibility.

Independent European diplomacy toward Iran is finished.

The stakes are getting increasingly high, with Iran now contemplating exiting the NPT
and stopping all cooperation with the IAEA.

Well, if the Europeans' real concern is to keep the IAEA intact, their action is
hardly going to have the desired result, as the North-South divide within the IAEA
will sharpen dramatically and qualitatively, as explicitly feared by IAEA chief
Mohammad ElBaradei.

In his latest report, ElBaradei cited good progress in Iran's cooperation with the
IAEA and stated that Iran's nuclear program would be subjected from now on to routine
inspections. How will he react a few weeks or months from now when Iran is no longer
a part of the IAEA and the whole Muslim world is blaming the IAEA of indiscrete
double standards?

Not exactly bright prospects for the IAEA and its Western composition, and all the
more reason for the IAEA to amend itself and step back from the confrontational path
it has chosen in regard to Iran.

Conveniently overlooked by both the IAEA and the European trio is a proposal made by
Iran's President Mahmud Ahmadinejad in his recent UN speech for the involvement of
foreign (state and private) companies in Iran's nuclear fuel fabrication which, if
implemented, would further guarantee that no diversion to illicit purposes occurs.

Unfortunately, no serious consideration was given to Ahmadinejad's proposal and,
understandably, the U.S. and European media were more fixated on his criticisms of
"nuclear apartheid".

At this point, a pertinent question: what exactly will be achieved by referring
Iran's nuclear case to the UN, other than angering Iran to the point of exiting the
NPT? A former top IAEA official, Pierre Goldschmidt, has recently written an article
in the New York Times stating that the purpose would be not to impose sanctions but
to force Iran toward greater transparency.

Right, Goldschmidt, you are asking the Security Council to supplant the IAEA, as if
you were blind to the machinations of superpower politics and the explicit
expressions of joy by U.S. officials at the IAEA, who relish a new isolation of Iran
in the international community.

At this point, all roads lead to the Security Council, but where do they go from
there? In the absence of any smoking gun and Iran's steady cooperation with the IAEA
inspections since 2003, this would be a huge leap backward, exacerbating global
tensions, particularly if Iran acts on its threats to cease its cooperation with the
IAEA and discard its adherence to the Additional Protocol, causing a tougher Security
Council backlash, including sanctions.

But since Iran has already been under the sword of US economic sanctions for a long
time, a UN sanction regime on Iran could only be effective if it covered Iran's
energy industry, on which Europe and China, among others, count so much.

UN sanctions on Iranian oil and gas would cause havoc on the volatile global energy
market, driving energy prices much higher than they are now, thus hurting Western
consumers and energy-dependent industries.

It would not be unrealistic, according to one international oil consultant who spoke
to Asia Times, to see an increase of 15% to 20% in oil prices in the event of such a
scenario. That would mean somewhere between $80 to $90 per barrel of oil, quite
burdensome on the non-oil developing nations which nowadays are weighing how to
behave at the next IAEA meeting in November.

And as if Middle East tensions are not already high enough, with clashes in Iraq and
Afghanistan seemingly increasing, who can deny the negative side-effect of the
nuclear crisis in terms of a qualitative sharpening of these tensions, particularly
in Iraq where Iran exercises considerable clout?

Already, Iran-Britain ties have suffered a big blow, with London leading the march
against Iran within the IAEA, and there is anti-British turmoil in Basra, with
Iranian accusations of British complicity in disturbances in southern Iran.

Can Prime Minister Tony Bliar, his country already a target of terrorist attacks in
London and his party losing votes due to his unpopular common cause with the White
House, really afford to take on Iran simultaneously, risking lucrative Iranian trade
and having his paratroops in southern Iraq battling pro-Iranian groups? Clearly not.

Nor are President George W Bush's options any better, in the light of natural
disasters forcing domestic priorities. Bush seemingly could not muster enough troops
to collect the dead in New Orleans; how in the world is he going to tackle a major
crisis with a nation of 70 million? Isn't it better for both Iran and the U.S. to
engage in direct dialogue and to try resolving their differences in a more civil and
non-coercive way?

The answer is, not as long as the U.S. government and its army of analysts stubbornly
cling to the much-refuted notion of an Islamic regime in Iran on the verge of
collapse (See "The Persian puzzle, or the CIA's?", December 3, 2004:
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/9287f58827c1788b?hl=en)

The Iranian regime is not about to collapse, at least not out of its own volition or
internal dynamics, and after a quarter century of state-building it has weathered
enough internal and external crises to master the game of survival. No doubt it will
survive the coming showdown at the UN, perhaps with more popular backing to
compensate for its legitimation deficits, all the more reason why some hardline
editorials are even yearning for this battle at the UN.

Their views are not shared by everyone, however, and there are emerging voices of
dissent that warn of negative ramifications for Iran's economy and Ahmadinejad's
promises of jobs for millions of Iranian unemployed youths.

This external crisis has the potential to seriously derail the domestic priorities of
the former mayor-turned president, much to the chagrin of Iran's moderate politicians
who are against allowing the nuclear priority to set the country back economically
and diplomatically.

In conclusion, maybe Melissa Fleming is right after all. There is a window of
opportunity to resolve the nuclear crisis, though it is closing rapidly. After all,
there is usually a healthy side to any crisis. One only hopes that this particular
crisis is not terminal.

* Kaveh L. Afrasiabi, holds a Ph.D. in political science from Boston University. He
has completed post-doctoral studies at Harvard University and UC Berkeley, and he has
collaborated with the UN Program on Dialogue Among Civilizations
(http://www.un.org/Pubs/chronicle/2001/issue2/0102p54.htm). Dr. Afrasiabi is author
of several books and numerous articles, including "After Khomeini: New Directions in
Iran's Foreign Policy"
(http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0813321158/102-7616745-8791338),
"Iran's Foreign Policy Since 9/11", Brown's Journal of World Affairs, co-authored
with former deputy foreign minister Abbas Maleki, No 2, 2003
(http://www.caspianstudies.com/article/Iran's%20Foreign%20Policy.pdf). Dialogue of
Theologies As Dialogue of Civilizations (Global Scholarly Press, forthcoming),
"Communicative theory and theology", Harvard Theological Review, and many articles in
the New York Times, Telos, Brown's Journal of World Affairs, UN Chronicle
(http://www.un.org/Pubs/chronicle/2003/issue1/0103p75.html), Middle East Journal,
International Herald Tribune, and the San Francisco Chronicle. He recently
co-authored "Negotiating Iran's Nuclear Populism", The Brown Journal of World
Affairs, Volume XII, issue 2, Summer 2005, with Mustafa Kibaroglu. Dr. Afrasiabi
teaches political science at Tehran University.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/GI29Ak01.html

IAEA and Iran
http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Focus/IaeaIran/index.shtml

West does not seek the elimination of nukes, but rather the establishment of nuclear
monopoly
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/502efbdfaa7622f7?hl=en

Unratified additional protocol
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1b2b77819b38d9e3?hl=en

Such a Blot
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/43ee2e2149e17310?hl=en

Weapons of Mass Murder
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0f3f87b645a72fde?hl=en

Neocrazies Foiled
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/86df9c0e9c38d475?hl=en

Iran knocks Europe out
By Pepe Escobar
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/497a81cb3c315c65?hl=en

UN opens a Pandora's Box of "Iran exceptionalism"
Dr. Kaveh Afrasiabi
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/24bfe5a318d9a222?hl=en

There is Nothing to refer to UN Security Council
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/76824d9387903d4a?hl=en

WMD Postmortem
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0d02537756cafca8?hl=en

No wonder the West is so mad at Iran
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/83e63797f1a1af3b?hl=en

Bolton in a China Shop
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/9927bb4f65924e34?hl=en

JEW media sycophants & 36% HEU - IRAN told the truth, yet JEW keeps lying
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f90a6eef507f10a0?hl=en

Past Arguments Don't Square With Current Iran Policy
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f53d3a05bc5403c1?hl=en

The fuel behind Iran's nuclear drive
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2fcf81313deb4ae0?hl=en

The U.S. and Iran: Democracy, Terrorism, and Nuclear Weapons
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0d0dcf76abbaafb1?hl=en

NO Nuclear double standards
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/8e41f4a8a1a3e04c?hl=en

Backlash Builds Against Cheney's 'Guns of August'
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/8286b2b389247d0a?hl=en

An offer Iran MUST refuse
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/743b96400831f8a1?hl=en

Zero Tolerance
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1641ae424fde5b89?hl=en

Sino-Russian Guarantees?
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/bd8f5389ab0e8956?hl=en

More neo-crazy media sycophant LIES about Iran
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/d3fe84a9b64d20bc?hl=en

What The Neo-Crazies Knew
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/6b45fabf57726a03?hl=en

EU vs. Iran - Who's Right?
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/cbce70a3093360fb?hl=en

Iran should refer U.S. to Security Council for violating UNSCR-984
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0d54ef8e41b971bf?hl=en

Castration of NPT - U.S. instantly tore up NPT for India, so why should Iran obey a
torn up agreement!
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2c234f4a148cd298?hl=en

U.S. ripped NPT into pieces; Iran must withdraw from this annulled treaty
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/fbf55e939908b2c2?hl=en

U.S. proliferation rhetoric and reality
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7d8c268ee51c07be?hl=en

Ambassador Bolton's Agenda
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1ca916601b7a7bc8?hl=en

Iran's INALIENABLE RIGHT to uranium enrichment
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/245f6081b4e3d019?hl=en

A Palliative for Neo-Crazy Lies
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1b7968f98173938d?hl=en

Inalienable right without discrimination
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5012a673328fa044?hl=en

U.S. doesn't want to disarm even though it promised to do so
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/c0b86cad11cb9413?hl=en

UN Referral – Not
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/bddc928154c8c96a?hl=en

What Iranian obligations? What breaches? America's lies, lies, lies...
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/9535c4a90df98471?hl=en

Memo to slimy senators
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7065ffd57b51a959?hl=en

U.S. promised in 2000, to get rid of it's nukes!
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1e23bafecdac9e82?hl=en

U.S. has violated Iran's NPT rights!
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/02f1f48fafcac2b6?hl=en

Iran's diplomatic masterpiece
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f532352654efee1d?hl=en

Bush to sabotage NPT
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/6386adef83860d3e?hl=en

West's repeated violations of "Article IV & I" against Iran
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0123ceb12dd47321?hl=en

Israel guns for Iran - Why?
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2c0274540f3957b7?hl=en

U.S. wants definition of NPT 'noncompliance' changed!!!
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2abab5a7b8bce4c5?hl=en

NTP for dummies
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f317bb918ca244da?hl=en

CNN's Wolf Blitzer & David Albright: Jews global campaign against Iran
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/44fcd2a53218eb52?hl=en

The Real Threat From John Bolton
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/16fb61c3cca32703?hl=en

81-mm smoking rockets
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/fb2c580ba00d79a6?hl=en

U.S. plans to destroy NPT
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/760abaff1d8ac7c2?hl=en

Nuts to Bush
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/de936f823b4dfb11?hl=en

Iran's logic proven correct to the entire World
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/a5798de678dad2a9?hl=en

Sandbagging the NSG (Nuclear Suppliers Group)
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/238000abe8fe032e?hl=en

What Noncompliance?
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/32f537772749ecc2?hl=en

Sandbagging the EU
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/bb437d1ee00ad1e9?hl=en

Bye-Bye, NPT
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/eb8e9f617d0e0867?hl=en

Jew tells Bush to lie about Iran
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/c96849f55f92353e?hl=en

Targeting Non-existent Nukes?
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e25e86754767e3ef?hl=en

Blindly Backing Israel Against Iran
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/ca49370dcc1f41a4?hl=en

Condi Desperate to Stop EU-China-Iran Chain Reaction
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/26e6a24b43339654?hl=en

The Impossible Dream in the State of the Union Address
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/74938ea7958d0764?hl=en

Targeting Iran
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/dbb46af7ff3f0b66?hl=en

Bay of Pigs part 2, CIA-Israeli-MEK
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/b58f2a1d8b2290ff?hl=en

Threatening Iran - despite the evidence
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/ce6e09919da68cbb?hl=en

Virtual Nukes
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/c245e595ad17ae57?hl=en

Iran's having the capability to enrich uranium is not even tantamount to having the
capability to produce the essentially pure uranium-235 required to make a nuke
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/303c3ca53b67c0a7?hl=en

Dangerous Delusions About Iran
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/42c57f2ae0cdb3b0?hl=en

Thwarting the Neo-Crazies
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/66c79d721fd588d4?hl=en

Trashing the IAEA Again
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f8c610f6cc9e1fda?hl=en

U.S. keeps lying about Iran again & again
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e9f480b192bd425e?hl=en

Iran's Stealthy Nukes
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e47cc87d2b268368?hl=en

Uranium-Enrichment Myths Busted
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f7ebc6f4bed9d13a?hl=en

Iran Plays by the Rules - No Fair!
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/25be300601cc8984?hl=en

Nuclear Bait and Switch
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0a0dc80ca3b8e98f?hl=en

The myth of Iranian nukes
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/bf78503a661673e9?hl=en

North Korea has what Iraq didn't
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/56f613221080276e?hl=en

Iran has absolute right to enrich uranium
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0a8ac2dc599976ba?hl=en

Iran is in full compliance with NPT & IAEA
http://groups.google.ca/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/737b74e86ba897cb?hl=en