Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

@@ AIPAC and espionage: Guilty as Hell @@

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Arash

unread,
Sep 30, 2005, 7:59:31 AM9/30/05
to
AntiWar
September 30, 2005


AIPAC and Espionage: Guilty as Hell

Pentagon analyst plea bargains, threatens to expose Israel's Washington cabal


By Justin Raimondo


The plea bargain struck by former Pentagon analyst Lawrence A. Franklin – charged
(http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/reports/2005/franklin_indictment_04aug2005.htm)
with five counts of handing over classified information to officials of an Israeli
lobbying group, who passed it on to Israeli diplomatic personnel
(http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/001067.html) – has delivered a body blow to the
defense of the two remaining accused spies
(http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/08/04/national/main759248.shtml).

Steven Rosen
(http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:wIzmGOrZ9loJ:www.forward.com/articles/3097%2BSteve%2BRosen&hl=en),
who for 20 years was the chief lobbyist over at the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC), and Keith Weissman
(http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:jNKEXZUOAKgJ:www.forward.com/articles/3082%2BKeith%2BWeissman&hl=en),
AIPAC's top foreign policy analyst, befriended Larry Franklin and pumped him for
top-secret information – including sensitive data about al-Qaeda, the Khobar Towers
terrorist attack, Iran's weapons program, and attacks on U.S. soldiers in Iraq. Now
they face the likely prospect of Franklin testifying to their treason in court.

For months, AIPAC's defenders have been bruiting it about that this prosecution is
persecution (http://www.ijn.com/archive/2005%20arch/040105.htm), that the whole thing
is a "setup" (http://freedomunderground.org/view.php?v=3&t=3&aid=12293).

What Steven Rosen, Keith Weissman, and Larry Franklin are accused of is routine, said
their defenders – "everybody does it" – and the decision to go after AIPAC is thinly
disguised anti-Semitism
(http://www.jta.org/page_print_story.asp?intarticleid=14536&intcategoryid=5), the
21st century American equivalent of Kristallnacht
(http://www.mtsu.edu/~baustin/knacht.html). They have impugned the FBI as some sort
of neo-Nazi outfit, exonerated the accused before even hearing the charges, and
engaged in a smear campaign (http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=5696) against
anyone who wonders why it is that a purportedly American organization is engaged in
an intelligence-gathering operation involving the transfer of top-secret information
to a foreign government.

Now the man they portrayed as being a persecuted victim is admitting that, yes, he
spied for Israel, and, furthermore, the clear implication of this apparent plea
bargain is that he is prepared to expose the spy ring that Israel was – and perhaps
still is – running inside AIPAC, one of
(http://www.jewishaz.com/jewishnews/971128/aipac.shtml) the most powerful lobbying
groups in Washington.

This case has received relatively little
(http://news.google.com/news?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG%3A2005-22,GGLG%3Aen&q=%22larry%2Bfranklin%22)
publicity in relation to its importance. It isn't just the fact that, for the first
time in recent memory, Israel's powerful lobby has been humbled. What is going on
here is the exposure of Israel's underground army in the U.S. – covert legions of
propagandists and outright spies, whose job it is to not only make the case for
Israel but to bend American policy to suit Israel's needs (and, in the process,
penetrate closely-held U.S. secrets
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1438.htm).

Particularly fascinating is the apparent longevity of the ongoing investigation: the
implication of the latest indictment
(http://www.antiwar.com/rep2/FranklinSupersedingIndictment.pdf) is that FBI
counterintelligence officials have been looking into Israel's covert activities in
the U.S. since at least 1999, when Steven Rosen apparently was observed telling a
"foreign official" that he (Steven Rosen) had "picked up an extremely sensitive piece
of intelligence" identified as "codeword protected". At this meeting, the indictment
avers, Steven Rosen handed over this information – regarding "terrorist activities in
Central Asia" – to the foreign official.

The AIPAC spy nest (http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=6890) has been burrowing
deeply into Washington's official secrets without regard for propriety or party. The
indictment describes the duo's extensive contacts with a wide range of U.S.
government officials, Israeli diplomats, and other individuals, none of them
identified by name.

However, two have been subsequently outed in the media by sources close to the
investigation: they are David Satterfield
(http://www.tacomapjh.org/SecondHighestUSDiplomat.htm), a deputy assistant secretary
for Near Eastern affairs (http://damascus.usembassy.gov/event-satterfield3.html) and
now the second most senior U.S. government representative in occupied Iraq, and
Kenneth Pollack (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Pollack), who served on the
National Security Council in the Clinton administration. Said Pollack: "I believe I
am USGO-1", identified in the second indictment as having met with Steven Rosen and
Keith Weissman on December 12, 2000. Kenneth Pollack handed over classified
information about "strategy options" against an unidentified "Middle Eastern
country". (http://www.jta.org/page_view_story.asp?intarticleid=15781&intcategoryid=3)

Kenneth Pollack (http://www.brook.edu/scholars/kpollack.htm), a key Democratic Party
foreign policy adviser, authored an influential book, "The Threatening Storm"
(http://www.cfr.org/publication.html?id=4876), which convinced many liberals to jump
on board the pro-war bandwagon. "If we observe how we were lied into war
(http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j070903.html) with Iraq, and by whom"
(http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j072803.html), I wrote in May
(http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=6068), "the whole affair looks more like an
Israeli covert operation by the day".

The AIPAC spy scandal is confirming this in spades – and much else, too. It is also
showing that the Israelis were not about to stop with Iraq, but were – and are –
lobbying furiously for more military action in the Middle East, this time aiming for
regime change in TEHRAN.

The indictments issued against Larry Franklin, Steven Rosen, and Keith Weissman
describe a systematic attempt by Israel's FIFTH column in Washington to garner
top-secret U.S. intelligence about IRAN, its weapons program, and U.S. deliberations
about what action to take.

The chief beneficiaries of the conquest of Iraq, and subsequent threats
(http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=263941) against both IRAN
(http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=6734) and Syria
(http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7249), have been, in descending order, Israel
(http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=2859), IRAN
(http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7034), and Osama bin Laden
(http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=3705).

Al-Qaeda has used the invasion as a recruiting tool
(http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0718/dailyUpdate.html) and training ground for its
global jihad against the United States
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7460-2005Jan13.html).

IRAN has extended (http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/GC02Ak01.html) its
influence deep into southern Iraq (http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/072105L.shtml)
and has penetrated (http://www.lewrockwell.com/wanniski/wanniski74.html) the central
government in Baghdad.

In the long run, however, Israel benefits the most
(http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2003-03-17-oppose_x.htm), as a major
Middle Eastern Arab country fragments into at least three pieces and the U.S.
military is ineluctably
(http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2005/06/22.html) drawn
(http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j033103.html) into neighboring countries.

While the U.S. imposes an occupation eerily reminiscent
(http://www.antiwar.com/jamail/?articleid=4468) of Israel's longstanding occupation
of Palestinian lands and prepares to deal with Israel's enemies in the region, Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon makes major incursions
(http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=79141) into the West Bank,
even while supposedly "withdrawing" from Gaza
(http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20050928/wl_mideast_afp/mideast).

In the meantime, the political and military bonds between the U.S. and Israel are
strengthened, as the two allies present an indissoluble united front against the
entire Muslim world.

Except the alliance is far from indissoluble, as the AIPAC spy scandal reveals. The
U.S.-Israeli relationship, often described as "SPECIAL"
(http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-22,GGLG:en&q=US%2BIsrael%2Bspecial%2Brelationship&spell=1),
is rather more ambiguous than is generally recognized, both by Israel's staunchest
friends and its most implacable enemies. This has come out in Israel's funneling
American military technology to China
(http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=6852), and the threat of American sanctions
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1505209,00.html), but was also made
manifest earlier by indications (http://www.antiwar.com/israeli-files.php) that
Israel was conducting extensive spying operations in the U.S. prior to 9/11 –
suspicions that are considerably strengthened by the AIPAC spy brouhaha.

Israel's secret war against America has so far been conducted in the dark, but the
Rosen-Weissman trial will expose these night creatures to the light of day. Blinking
and cursing, they'll be confronted with their treason, and, even as they whine that
"everybody does it," the story of how
(http://www.amconmag.com/2004_01_19/article1.html) and why
(http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html) a cabal of foreign agents came to exert
so much influence on the shape of U.S. foreign policy will be told.

In the course of bending American policy to the Israelis' will, they had to
compromise the national security of the United States – and that's what tripped them
up, in the end.

The blogger Billmon succinctly summed up (http://billmon.org/archives/002088.html)
how this case throws a new light on the real contours of U.S.-Israeli relations and
puts an entirely different face on the "SPECIAL relationship":

"While the marriage may look like perfect conjugal bliss from the Washington
end, the Jerusalem end has a different point of view – and always will. The Israelis
understand, even if their American patrons do not, that they live in another country,
one with its own national interests, its own strategic ambitions and its own enemies,
none of which necessarily overlap with America's.

"They don't even make much of an attempt to hide it, as this writer for David
Horowitz's Frontpage (to Israel what the Daily Worker once was to the Soviet Union)
makes clear: 'A more independent Israel is determined to make its own mark on the
world – questioning U.S. authority more frequently in order to establish its own
autonomous relations with other countries'.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18992

"A good idea. It's just a shame our own political lap dogs and their media water
carriers won't do likewise".


The Soviet analogy is very apt, The success of both the KGB and the Mossad in
Washington, albeit at different times, was in both cases enabled by an alliance born
of political necessity as well as military utility. Our World War II alliance
(http://www.fff.org/freedom/0495a.asp) with the Soviets made the KGB's job a lot
easier, allowing them to set up a network based on ideological loyalty that later
reaped intelligence dividends.

In addition, there was a lot of domestic political pressure to give the Russians what
they wanted, as the Communists took the lead
(http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-22,GGLG:en&q=harry%2Bhopkins%2Bkgb)
in dragging us into war in order to save Stalin's "workers' paradise" from Hitler's
legions.

America's longstanding relationship with Israel similarly gave the Israelis the basic
structure of a very efficient and increasingly bold spying apparatus in the U.S., the
tentacles of which reached into the upper echelons of the U.S. government, including
the Pentagon.

AIPAC functions simultaneously as a lobbying group – one whose will is rarely defied
by legislators – and as a key link in the chain of espionage that binds us to the
Israelis in a very "special relationship".

Israel's legendary Mossad intelligence service, with its reputation for both
efficiency and ruthlessness, reportedly shadowed
(http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7545.htm) the 9/11 hijackers on
American soil as they prepared to launch the biggest terrorist attack in our history.

Multiple (http://www.forward.com/issues/2002/02.03.15/news2.html) sources
(http://ww1.sundayherald.com/37707) reported a large-scale surveillance operation
(http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=israel+spying+US&btnG=Search&meta) directed at
U.S. government buildings, including offices of the Drug Enforcement Agency, the FBI,
U.S. courthouses, and some military bases and research facilities. The AIPAC spy cell
in Washington was the brain, and the "Israeli art students"
(http://cryptome.org/dea-il-spy.htm) – whose movements shadowed the hijackers in
Florida (http://www.antiwar.com/rep/lemonde1.html) and elsewhere – were the arms and
feet (http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7127) of a subterranean creature whose
dimensions we are only just beginning to discover.

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7454


0 new messages