Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
@@ Watch out for the "Sayanim Spammers", the "Hebrew Terror Battalion" at SCI @@
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Arash
Dec 4, 2006, 4:06:42 AM12/4/06
to
These parasites who constantly spread anti-Iran hate messages
are not humans, they are well trained "Sayanim", also known as the "Mossad's
little helpers".
Sometimes they post messages as a "Zoroastrian" (Fake Zoroastrians), who really really 'love' Iran/Persia!
Sometimes they post messages as an anti-arab (Fake arab-haters), who really really 'love' Iran/Persia!
Sometimes they post messages as "Opposition Groups", all of which are connected to the Western Intelligence.
Sometimes they post messages as a defender of "Zahra Kazemi", a filthy "CSIS" agent.
Sometimes they post messages as a defender of Western 'Democracy' (colonialism).
Sometimes they post messages as supporter of dropping nuclear weapons on "Qum", as though, city of Qum is located in Europe!
Sometimes they post messages as defenders of murdering of Iranian Basjis and Sepahis (who bravely defended their homeland), as though, Basjis are Russians!
Sometimes they post messages as supporters of Bush, because he wants nothing but 'FREEDOM' for Iran!
http://www.bushspeaks.com/img/bloody_iraqi_child.jpg
Am I Free Yet, Bush!
Shock and Awe Plan Against Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5f498031b564aaa6
Bush Plan: Nuke Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0f6e4a32e83baa05
Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations 2005
http://www.nukestrat.com/us/jcs/jp.htm
And the most hilarious of all is that sometimes they post messages as supporters of Israel, because Jews hate arabs, so this means they just 'love'! Iran/Persia so so very much!
British Jew Bernard Lewis proposed the dismemberment of Iran as early as 1979
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1a601d2b216ff87d
Jew Edward Nicolae Luttwak push for break-up of Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/3d1f0b79b05e42a1
'American Jewish Committee' pimps war with Iran: The following advert appeared in the Financial Times UK
http://208.42.237.17/Repository/getimage.dll?path=FTU/2006/04/05/11/Img/Pg011.png&GZ=T
AIPAC pimps war with Iran: The video and maps below are intended to help you better understand the escalating threat that is Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons
http://www.aipac.org/iran/nuclear_status/escalating_threat.html
Jewish-American Enterprise Institute (AEI) gives support to anti-Iran terrorists
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/39d298a97ef6ffc8
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5b0804a24ef94611
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/28f23677e3eecb01
Another War for Israel: The amen corner howls for war with Iran
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8663
Jews wants Iran decimated soon, no more excuses!
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/4442df271397453b
What really happened to the Shah of Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/3e88a5bb7ccb3e42
Understanding the Jew demons behind the 1979 coup
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/09e844840aa4f006
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confessions of an ex-Mossad agent: "Victor Ostrovsky"
http://www.eaec.org/dove/dove1990aw/Victor%20Ostrovsky.jpg
Excerpt from Victor Ostrovsky's, "By way of deception" (1990).
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0971759502?v=glance
... The Mossad - believe it or not - has just 30 to 35 case officers, or katsas, operating in the world at any one time. The main reason for this extraordinary low total, as you will read in this book, is that unlike other countries, Israel can tap the significant and loyal cadre of the worldwide Jewish community outside Israel. This is done through a unique system of "Sayanim", volunteer Jewish helpers.
By Way of Deception describes the shocking scope and depth of the Mossad's influence, disclosing how Jewish communities in the U.S., Europe, and South America are armed and trained by the organization in secret "self-defense" units, and how Mossad agents facilitate the drug trade in order to pay the enormous costs of its far-flung, clandestine operation. http://www.victorostrovsky.com/books.html
Among other kinds of dirty tricks in which Mossad also specializes, Ostrovsky asserts that it doctored the file of then-UN Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim to implicate him in Nazi crimes. The doctored file subsequently was "discovered" by then-Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Benyamin Netanyahu to smear Waldheim. The reason? Israel was unhappy with Waldheim's criticism of Israeli activities in southern Lebanon.
Mossad at one time decided to assassinate President George Bush when the president was in Madrid at the end of October 1991 for the opening of Arab-Israeli peace talks; because the American president had frozen U.S. loan guarantees to Israel. Evidence was to be manufactured implicating the Palestinians. Eventually, however, the assassination plot was called off, for reasons Ostrovsky does not explain.
Mossad divides outside Jews into 3 categories:
1) First are the "Sayanim", volunteer spies for Israel.
2) Second is the "Israel lobby", which follows Mossad's guidance.
3) Third is "B'nai B'rith", which can be relied upon to "tarnish as anti-semites
whomever they can't sway to the Israeli cause".
The other side of deception: a rogue agent exposes the Mossad's secret agenda
http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0495/9504058.htm
Victor Ostrovsky's website
http://www.victorostrovsky.com/the_man.html
Operation Trojan
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/deception.html
I was there when the Americans bombed
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/iwasthere.html
Sayanim", volunteer spies for Israel
http://judicial-inc.biz/Sayanim.htm
Victor Ostrovsky
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By_Way_of_Deception
No matter what you do for Jews and no matter how assiduously you toady to their interests, they will never respect yours. "Victor Ostrovsky", Mossad.
Sayan = Millions of Jew-spies around the World.
Katsa = Mossad case officer
kidon = Jew assassins
Misgerot or "frames" = Jew armed groups in other countries.
Vaudat Orchim = Millions of Jew broadcasters, publishers, editors, writers, and
bloggers who spread lies.
OCCUPIED AMERICA - Part I
--------------------------------
SAYANIM
--------------
I dimly recall quite a fuss back in 1959 (I was quite young then) about Jack Kennedy and the question of "dual loyalty". The media declared loudly and publicly that many people questioned whether Kennedy owed his first allegiance to the United States, or to the Vatican.
Even at the tender age of 12, this descendant of Cromwell's round- heads thought concern about loyalty to the Pope a bit overblown.
The Pope seemed a "lord spiritual" in every respect, lacking any of the normal appurtenances of a "lord temporal", such as a standing army. Indeed, if one listened to the Pope or any of his Bishops, it was awfully hard to discern any worldly objective which a president of that faith might entertain that conflict with the worldly interests of the United States.
After all, the Vatican did not receive $5 billions per year in aid from the U.S. Treasury.
Indeed, it was hard to understand why a Catholic should be treated differently from a Methodist or Presbyterian. Kennedy's religion (or lack thereof) seemed far more relevant to the question of his character and the kinds of moral values that might weigh in his decisions. The temporal interests of Rome seemed a bit distant.
Further, conspiracies cannot be concealed for long, and there was no hard evidence of any such thing by the Catholic Church.
Not so with the Jews!
There clearly is at least one international conspiracy, and it is run directly by the State of Israel.
Here is a short quote from the book "By Way of Deception" by Victor Ostrovsky (St. Martin's, 1990), formerly a Colonel in the Israeli intelligence service "Mossad".
Beginning on page 86:
"The next day Ran S. delivered a lecture on the sayanim, a unique and important part of the Mossad's operation. Sayanim - assistants - must be 100% Jewish. They live abroad, and though they are not lsraeli citizens, many are reached through their relatives in Israel.
An Israeli with a relative in England, for example, might be asked to write a letter saying the person bearing the letter represents an organization whose main goal is to help save Jewish people in the diaspora. Could the British relative help in any way?
"There are thousands of sayanim around the world. In London alone, there are about 2000 who are active, and another 5000 on the list. They fulfill many different roles. A car sayan, for example, running a rental agency, could help the Mossad rent a car without having to complete the usual documentation. An apartment sayan would find accommodation without raising suspicions, a bank sayan could get you money if you needed it in the middle of the night, a doctor sayan would treat a bullet wound without reporting it to the police, and so on. The idea is to have a pool of people available when needed who can provide services but will keep quiet about them out of loyalty to the cause. They are paid only costs".
Continuing on page 87
"Suppose during an operation a katsa suddenly had to come up with an electronics store as a cover. A call to a sayan in that business could bring 50 television sets, 200 VCRs - whatever was needed - from his warehouse to your building, and in next to no time, you'd have a store with $3 or $4 million worth of stock in it".
"Since most Mossad activity is in Europe, it may be preferable to have a business address in North America. So, there are address sayanim and telephone sayanim. If a katsa has to give out an address or a phone number, he can use the sayan's. And if the sayan gets a letter or a phone call, he will know immediately how to proceed. Some business Sayanim have a bank of 20 operators answering phones, typing letters, faxing messages, all a front for the Mossad".
And on page 88:
"Katsas in the stations are in charge of the sayanim, and most active sayanim will be visited by a katsa once every three months or so, which for the katsa usually means between two and four face-to-face meetings a day with Sayanim, along with numerous telephone conversations. The system allows the Mossad to work with a skeleton staff. That's why, for example, a KGB station would employ about 100 people, while a comparable Mossad station would need only six or seven."
On page 221, Ostrovsky gives an example of what a Sayan can be expected to do for Israel's Mossad:
"The Mossad already had considerable information about the Exocet, thanks in part to a Sayan who worked at Aerospatiale and had passed along details. They had also conducted a small operation, sending a team to break into the plant accompanied by a missile expert flown in from Israel for the occasion. He was taken into the plant "with handles", and materials brought to him for his expert opinion. His task was to determine what they should photograph. The team spent four and a half hours inside the plant before leaving without a trace".
It is a crime, a felony, for a civilian to participate in spying operations in this manner.
Israel's Mossad is exposing tens of thousands of Jews around the world to considerable legal risk, and the sayanim, being sophisticated business people, surely know this. If that is so, then why does this system work? Why is the risk acceptable?
Here is Ostrovsky's answer from Page 87:
"One thing you know for sure is that even if a Jewish person knows it is the Mossad, he might not agree to work with you-but he won't turn you in. You have at your disposal a non-risk recruitment system that actually gives you a pool of millions of Jewish people to tap from outside your own borders. It's much easier to operate with what is available on the spot, and sayanim offer incredible practical support everywhere".
Now one might suggest that, for example, Great Britain could use a similar system and recruit among WASPS around the world. But they don't, because they can't. It takes an extraordinary degree of racial solidarity and racial motivation for such a "non-risk recruitment system" to work properly. Remember, all of these activities are spying, with long prison terms if caught. Americans of English, Irish and Italian ancestry may have some residual loyalties to the old "mother country". But this residue is nothing like the racial solidarity of the Jews. Such racial feelings are so strong and so pervasive among Jews that the Mossad knew in advance that their recruitment system was "non-risk". Britain, Ireland, Italy and the Vatican know better than to try.
While it may be true that Americans of English, Irish and Italian ancestry have dual loyalties, these white gentile dual loyalties are nothing like the degree of race-based loyalty possessed by the overwhelming majority of Jews. You have it on the authority of Mossad!
Ostrovsky explains, beginning at the bottom of page 122:
"We took the Brits seriously, but everyone in the building used to say they were probably deluded because of "the Bitch". That's what they always called Margaret Thatcher inside the Mossad. They had her tagged as an anti-Semite. There was one simple question asked when anything happened: "Is it good for the Jews or not?" Forget about policies, or anything else. That was the only thing that counted, and depending on the answer, people were called anti-Semites, whether deservedly or not".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The problem is that Jews DO NOT have dual loyalties!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
90% of Jews have a single loyalty. The loyalty is not necessarily to Israel, but to the welfare and power of Jews generally. That is the only thing that matters.
The only question that ever gets asked is; "How will this affect Jews?" No other interests are taken into account at all!
Indeed a corollary of "dual loyalty" is the goyish notion that if you sacrifice to help others, they will reciprocate. If someone helps Jews, there should be a reward.
European gentiles assume that comity and reciprocity are inherent in the psychological makeup of all humanity. Not so, according to Ostrovsky (page 231):
"The relationship between the Mossad and Danish intelligence is so intimate as to be indecent. But it's not the Mossad's virtue that is compromised by the arrangement; it's Denmark's. And that's because the Danish are under the mistaken impression that because they saved a lot of Jews in World War II, the Israelis are grateful and they can trust the Mossad".
No matter what you do for Jews and no matter how assiduously you toady to their interests, they will never respect yours.
That explains why destructive welfare state policies thrive despite 40 years of soaring black illegitimacy rates and the deepening destruction of the black family and community in America. Does the policy harm blacks! Of course! But that is irrelevant. Welfare dependence has created a block that votes 90% for candidates friendly to the welfare state and to Israel. Would blacks be better off as tradesmen and entrepreneurs with stable families? Of course, but then there would be no easy way to control their votes. The hopeless dependency of most blacks increases the political power of Jews. That is why the policy continues.
There is no comity, reciprocity or sense of obligation (dual loyalty) that causes Jews to moderate their attack on America's blacks. Now you might ask why Clinton, the "best friend Israel has ever had at the White House", would sign welfare reform. The answer is the same. The white illegitimacy rate has reached 25%. Millions of white girls in suburban and rural areas are going on AFDC while their skin-head boyfriends camp with them at night.
There is no way our masters are going to use the tax dollars at their disposal to finance the creation of Dr. Pierce's 10 million man army 20 years from now!
It is one thing to fool 40% of Euro-Americans who have jobs and pay taxes into believing they can get something out of the system. It is quite another to subsidize the creation of a dangerous subculture with real dollars. Jews just don't make those kinds of mistakes.
Ways can be found within the bureaucracy to continue welfare to blacks. Hence Hillary Clinton's campaign to "fix" welfare reform.
A classic illustration of this phenomenon comes from a book entitled "Special Tasks" (Little-Brown, 1994, 1995) written by Pavel Sudoplatov and his son Anatoly.
Lieutenant General Pavel Sudoplatov was Joseph Stalin's NKVD director in charge of stealing atomic secrets. He reported directly to Beria.
From page 172:
"The most vital information for developing the first Soviet atomic bomb came from scientists engaged in the Manhattan Project to build the American Atomic Bomb - Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Leo Szilard". Robert Oppenheimer was the director in charge of the Manhattan project.
From page 186-87:
"When it became clear that the atomic project was a heavily guarded, top-secret American priority, Eitingon and I suggested that we use our networks of illegals as couriers for our sources of information. Vassili Zarubin, our Washington rezident, instructed Kheifetz to divorce all intelligence operations from the American Communist party, which we knew would be closely watched by the FBI, and to have Oppenheimer sever all contacts with Communists and left-wingers".
On page 188:
"In 1943, a world-famous actor of the Moscow Yiddish State Art Theatre, Solomon Mikhoels, together with well -known yiddish poet Itzik Feffer, toured the United States on behalf of the Jewish Anti-fascist Committee. Before their departure, Beria instructed Mikhoels and Feffer to emphasize the great Jewish contribution to science and culture in the Soviet Union. Their assignment was to raise money and convince American public opinion that Soviet anti-semitism had been crushed as a result of Stalin's policies. Kheifetz made sure that the message they brought was conveyed to Oppenheimer. Kheifetz said that Oppenheimer, the son of a German-Jewish immigrant, was deeply moved by the information that a secure place for Jews in the Soviet Union was guaranteed. They discussed Stalin's plans to set up a Jewish autonomous republic in the Crimea after the war was won against facism".
Beria understood the psychology of unitary loyalty perfectly!
Continuing on page 189:
"In developing Oppenheimer as a source, Vassili Zarubin's wife, Elizabeth, was essential. She hardly appeared foreign in the United States. Her manner was so natural and sociable that she immediately made friends. Slim, with dark eyes, she had the classic Semitic beauty that attracted both men and women, and she was one of the most successful agent recruiters, establishing her own illegal network of Jewish refugees from Poland, and recruiting one of Szilard's secretaries, who provided technical data".
Oppenheimer's rationale was "fear that the Germans might produce the first atomic bomb". But all he had to do to beat the Germans to the punch was to build the bomb for America. And indeed, that would have been the natural result of "dual loyalties". He could have helped Jews and remained loyal to America at the same time.
But then helping America was not in the calculus at all. As Beria understood perfectly, he was concerned only with one unitary question; "How does this affect Jews?" And the answer was that just as organizing the blacks and browns to vote their antagonistic racial interests is critical to maintaining Jewish power over whites in
the 1990's, giving the atomic secrets to Russia was the one way to reduce the power of whites in America in the 1940s and 50s. Oppenheimer's naive view (prior to the creation of the Israeli State) was that a nuclear armed Russia would provide one more possible haven for Jews with the power to protect them.
The Goyim in our OSS (the forerunner of the CIA) would have assumed "dual loyalty" and concluded that Oppenheimer presented no security risk.
They were dead wrong, as Beria clearly understood.
So now the question becomes: - How many sayanim does it take to "occupy America"?
Is Madeline Kerbel Albright (nominee for Secretary of State) a Sayan?
Is William Cohen (nominee for Secretary of Defense) a Sayan?
Is William Berger (nominee for National Security Agency chief) a Sayan?
Is Anthony Lake (nominee to head CIA) a Sayan?
Is Robert Rubin (secretary of Treasury) a Sayan?
Is Alan Greenspan (chairman of the Federal Reserve) a Sayan?
Are these reasonable questions to ask?
In truth, of course, it is somewhat unlikely that these people, by far the most powerful group in the United States, would agree to spend their time schlepping TV sets for Mossad, or divulging secrets. They can do far more to serve Jewish interests by guiding U.S. economic, diplomatic and defense policies to serve Israel and Jewish interests than they ever could through risky behaviors like divulging classified data.
In fact, these people are in a far better position to put pressure on Israel than Israel is to put pressure them.
Are the people named above capable of articulating U.S. interests (as opposed to Jewish interests) on an intellectual level?
Of course! Quite skillfully, in fact!
Are they capable of acting upon those interests (our interests)?
That is a much tougher question. For a majority, it appears that the answer is clearly "no" if Jewish insterests might also be involved. The psychological and emotional ties within the group are so strong, and they are so powerfully alienated from the white gentile majority that their decisions and actions will never match their words. Just as Oppenheimer's actions failed to square with his words.
Clinton's cabinet and the media moguls who control him are likely to have their own strong views on the question "Is it good for Jews, or not?" And they are not likely to take orders from Israel. Does that mean there is no "conspiracy'?
Other than the publicly documented spying and extortion operations run by the State of Israel, there probably isn't one. Rather, what we have is an obsessive concern for the interests of Jews and a psychological inability to represent the interests of others that is shared by such an overwhelming majority of Jews, that their uncoordinated actions appear pre-planned.
Colonel Ostrovsky notes in "By way of Deception" that Israel and its supporters have a concept of the relation between media and government that is powerfully at odds with our own Anglo-Saxon tradition that inspired the First Amendment.
From page 290:
"As usual in these affairs, the journalism fraternity in Israel knew about the operation all along-or at least, they knew what the Mossad and the prime minister's office wanted them to know - but they agreed to withhold the story until they were given leave to print it. There is a committee of editors, called the Vaudat Orchim,
of all the major media outlets in Israel that meets regularly with government officials for background briefing on current events. Israeli television is government controlled, as is all but one rogue radio station, so that broadcasting is never a problem to control".
The Jewish - SDS flirtation with "free speech" at Berkeley in the 1960's was a temporary romance of convenience. Culturally, they are more comfortable with a "Vaudat Orchim" and controlled news.
Is Laurence Tisch (CEO of CBS,) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Robert Sarnoff (RCA and NBC) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
How about Jeff Zuker (executive producer of NBC Nightly news)?
Is Jeff Sagansky (head of CBS entertainment division) a Sayan? A member of a Vaudat Orchim?
Is Stuart Bloomberg (head of entertainment programming at ABC) a Sayan? How about Vaudat Orchim?
Is Brandon Tartikoff (Paramount Pictures) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Gerald Levin (Time Warner Communications) a Sayan? Perhaps part of a Vaudat Orchim?
Is Michael D. Eisner (Walt Disney Co.) a Sayan? Or a Vaudat Orchim member?
Is Martin S. Davis (Paramount Communications) a Sayan? Or a Vaudat Orchim, perhaps?
Is Peter Chernin (20th Century Fox Film Corp.) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
How about Sandy Grushow (Fox Entertainment)? Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Peter Guber (Columbia Pictures Entertainment) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Sumner Redstone [Murray Rothstein] (Viacom, MTV, Nickelodeon) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
Is Lew Wasserman (MCA Inc.) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Ron Nessen (MBS radio news) a Sayan? - or a Vaudat Orchim?
How about Samuel and Donald Newhouse (31 newspapers, 12 broadcast stations, 87 cable systems, Parade, New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, etc.)?
Sayanim?
Is Arthur Ochs Sulzberger (New York Times, 33 additional papers, 7 radio and TV broadcasters a cable company and three book publishers) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
Is Katherine Meyer Graham (Washington Post, Newsweek) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
Is Peter Kann (Dow Jones & Co, Wall Street journal) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
How about Mortimer B. Zuckerman (New York Daily News, U.S. News &World Report, Atlantic Monthly)? Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Do these people, and dozens more in similar positions meet to discuss how to manage the news? Again, the truth is probably not. Why?
Simple. They already know what messages must be censored and what events are newsworthy. They already know what to cover and what to leave on the cutting room floor. Except on rarest occasions, they do not need to be told what to do.
Each of these men will have his own passionately held convictions about what kinds of news and entertainment for goyim will best serve Jewish interests. These are not the type of men who would obediently follow instructions from Isreal. But then the deep racial paranoia and the intense loathing of Christianity that is taught to most Jews as children at the dinner table ensures that many Jews will pursue careers in media (such careers are "good for Jews") and will know what to do when they get to the top of a network. They generally do not need to be told!
And that, gentlemen, is the significance of "unitary racial loyalty" that exists among 90% of this world's Jews.
Pat Buchanan once referred to Capitol Hill as "Israeli Occupied Territory".
Can we justifiably say that we live in "Occupied America?"
No need to make up your minds yet. Might as well wait for parts two and three of the "Occupied America" series.
Then you can be the judge!
http://home.ddc.net/ygg/rj/rj-26.htm
OCCUPIED AMERICA - Part II
--------------------------------
MISGEROT
---------------
In part one of this "Occupied America" series, we discussed the network of Sayanim; - tens of thousands of Jews throughout the world who assist Israel's Mossad in gathering intelligence.
We saw how most gentiles view this activity as a sign of "dual loyalty", in that Jews will have a loyalty to their native countries and to Israel, and that the loyalty to Israel is what prompts them to serve as Sayanim.
However, if you think about it, "dual loyalties" would create considerable risk for Mossad. It would be impossible for them to know in advance the strength of the "non-Israel" loyalty, and whether it might be strong enough to cause Jews they approach to turn agents in. (All of this activity is a serious felony in virtually all countries inwhich it takes place).
However, Victor Ostrovsky, author of "By Way of Deception" quite candidly states that the existence of millions of Jews outside the borders of Israel gives Mossad a "non-risk recruitment tool":
"One thing you know for sure is that even if a Jewish person knows it is the Mossad, he might not agree to work with you - but he won't turn you in. You have at your disposal a non-risk recruitment system that actually gives you a pool of millions of Jewish people to tap from outside your own borders".
Now for this system to be "non-risk" these millions of Jews around the world must have only a single loyalty - loyalty to Jews and their interests. In the words of Ostrovsky:
"There was one simple question asked when anything happened: "Is it good for the Jews or not?" Forget about policies, or anything else. That was the only thing that counted... "
As an example of how this unitary or "single loyalty" works, we then examined the case of Robert Oppenheimer, director of the Manhattan Project, and father of the American atomic bomb, who passed atomic secrets to Russia.
Finally, the prior post listed all of those eligible to be Sayanim in cabinet level positions in our government, and at the very top of all of our major mass media, thus setting forth a prima facie case that America is, in fact, occupied by an alien power. The means, motive and opportunity clearly exist, as does the corpus delicti of a decaying and rudderless America.
In this installment, we are going to examine the heavily armed Jewish groups established and run by retired Mossad officers throughout the world, as a means of examining the question whether this is "Occupied America".
From "By Way of Deception" (St. Martins, 1990) Page 291:
"Arbel's department was responsible for setting up Jewish defense groups, called "frames", or Misgerot, all over the world, now including some parts of the United States, where anti-semitism is regarded as a threat. Often people with particular skills, such as doctors, are on reserve and called in for short periods to help with these frames. Normally, heads of the stations for the frames in the various countries are retired Mossad workers. The job is widely regarded as a sort of bonus for faithful service, a tshupar, the idea being that they've got all this expertise, why not use it?"
"The main job is to help the leaders of Jewish communities outside Israel plan for their own security. Part of this is done through the hets w-keshet, or "bow and arrow", Israel's paramilitary youth brigades. While all Israeli youths, boys and girls, belong to this "eduday noar ivry", or "battalion of Hebrew youth", often youths from other countries are brought over to spend the summer learning about security, picking up such skills as completing obstacle courses, pitching tents, and learning how to use a sniper rifle and Uzi assault rifle. Still others learn upgraded security skills, such as how to build a slick, for hiding weapons or documents, when and how to do security checks, as well as thefundamentals of investigation and intelligence gathering.
"Any use of the frames other than for self-protection has never been approved by any government official, although Mossad officials all know of such use. Thus, Yitzhak Shamir knew, but Peres, never a Mossad man, would not have known, even though he was prime minister. Israel does not sell the weapons directly to these foreign frames, but it does provide arms indirectly in a round-about arrangement with known arms dealers.
"The Mossad does not see these frames as information gatherers, although the station heads know from experience that the shortest route to getting praise is by supplying useful information. Many of the youths trained at the summer camps in Israel later become Sayanim, and it certainly provides a strong group of willing helpers, well trained, undaunted by the lingo, who have already shown the ability to take chances...."
Page 140:
"We were now also learning about Tsafririm and the "frames" set up as a defense mechanism by Jews around the world. In this area we had a problem, or at least some of us did. I just couldn't agree with this concept of having guard groups everywhere. I thought frames in England, for example, where kids learn how to build slicks for their weapons to protect their synagogues, were more dangerous than beneficial to the Jewish community. I brought up the argument that even if a group of people had been oppressed, with attempts made to exterminate them - as with the Jews - they had no right to act obstructively in democratic countries. I could understand this happening in Chile or Argentina, or any other country where people disappear off the streets, but not in England or France or Belgium.
"The fact that there are antisemitic groups, whether real or imaginary, is definitely not an excuse, because if you look into Israel's own backyard, you'll see anti-Palestinian groups. Did this mean we thought the Palestinians therefore had the right to store weapons and organize vigilante groups? Or would we call them terrorists?"
Let's summarize:
-----------------------
* Israel maintains armed groups within our borders.
* These groups are run by agents of a foreign power. (retired Mossad officers).
* Jewish youths from all over the world are flown to Israel to learn how to use machine guns and sniper rifles.
* Once in Israel, these youths receive this training as part of the "battalions of Hebrew youth", Israel's version of the Hitler Yungend.
* Israel smuggles full-automatic weapons to these groups through arms dealers.
* Retired Mossad agents supervise this activity and keep them out of trouble.
Three conditions must obtain before we can conclude that a country is "occupied" by a foreign power. These three conditions or symptoms of occupation must be clear.
* First, the occupier must hold commanding positions in the government and in the media.
* Second, the occupied police forces follow the agenda of the occupiers and ignore the illegal acts of occupation.
* Third, the occupier must control the electoral process and exact tribute from the occupied.
Maintaining armed cells throughout the Western world under the direction of foreign agents is profoundly illegal. Our FBI certainly knows about these Misgerot or "frames" but they do nothing about them.
No informants, no infiltrators, no arrests, no armed confrontations - nothing!
Nothing, that is, except deafening silence.
It is obviously not an enforcement priority.
Only the spy Pollard was apprehended and then only because Pollard was completely out of control. His copying of classified documents was so prodigious as to become an embarrassment to his Israeli handlers.
His discovery, as well as the revelations of Ostrovsky, had absolutely zero effect on our FBI. The only reasonable inferences to be drawn from these facts are:
That the FBI already knew who it works for;
That only a small number of people who read books would find out about these disclosures; and
That the people the FBI work for would remain in power, and that no change in enforcement policy is necessary.
It is ironic. The Soviet Union used the Communist party to spy in America back in the 1940's and 1950's. But they never dared flout U.S. law by arming the communist cells they controlled. Israel's activity is so absolutely and shockingly brazen that it leaves one breathless. The lack of response from our own law enforcement agencies is stunning silent testimony to the reason why Israel and its U.S. loyalists can openly ignore our laws.
Indeed, it is similar in many ways to the scene at Florence and Normandy during the Los Angeles riots. As Reginald Denny was having his brains beat out, a dozen armed police in three cars slowly and quietly backed away from the intersection. It was all captured on camera.
The message was clear. You white citizens are on your own! Do not expect us to protect you, even when we have the clear and overwhelming power to do so.
Message understood, boys!
What we get instead is Feinstein in the Senate and Schumer in the House ranting about how "uncomfortable" they feel living in a country in which people have guns, and trying to convince the middle class to be uncomfortable also. Their discomfort with people owning guns is clearly selective. No mention of the Misgerot, with their full-automatic (and clearly illegal) Uzi's. Jews owning guns is comforting - gentiles owning guns is not!
Our FBI follows the Schumer - Feinstein agenda by assigning thousands of agents to monitor anti-government types. They send out hundreds of informants and provocateurs hoping to talk unsophisticated whites into selling guns or exploding bombs on their own property.
Not surprisingly, they are occasionally successful.
They have enough success that the press is supplied with lurid stories about militias and bombs so that middle class Euro-America will think that the anti-government opposition is physically dangerous and threatening to them.
It is a happy marriage of law-enforcement with news management. They are new at this game, so occasionally they will make public relations mistakes, as with the Waco assault and the killing of Vickie Weaver. But supervisors are reprimanded and reassigned until more media savvy types can be found to replace them.
The fact that our FBI has never busted a Sayan or a Misgerot gives you a pretty clear idea of who they work for. It is a necessary pre-condition of "occupied" status.
But apparently their masters are not happy with mere obedience and loyal service. They demand degradation and humiliation as well.
Several years ago, our FBI was assigned the task of monitoring and analyzing "hate crimes". In an article published by USA Today on February 4, 1996, the FBI announced its statistics. There were 7947 hate crimes. 41% of the hate crimes were "intimidation". Another 23% were vandalism or spray painting.
Intimidation?
Our FBI has been assigned the task of monitoring name-calling.
Shouting an epithet at someone from across the street has become a "hate crime" in these United States of the Offended. And of course the graffiti that graces much of our urban landscape in these United States of the Offended has also become a "hate crime" if it contains politically incorrect thoughts or lands on a synagogue.
Our FBI has been reduced to Kindergarten hall monitors ever on the alert for politically incorrect insults.
There are 5 million assaults (unlawful beatings) committed each year in the United States. Blacks commit 7.2 times more interracial assaults than whites. When you correct for the fact that blacks comprise 12% of the population, it is 50 times more likely that a black will assault a white than it is for a white to assault a black.
So apparently, assigning the FBI the job of monitoring and gathering statistics on name calling and politically incorrect midnight artistry provides the media with the basic feedstock required to convince the soccer moms that it is the poor whites with anti-government views who are the dangerous criminals.
At the same time, of course, the Bureau of Justice Statistics has decided to stop gathering data on the race of crime perpetrators and victims. Too much grist for the internet!
An occupying power will seek to degrade those who obey its command. Like mandatory "sensitivity training", making the FBI cross dress as Ms. Manners is an important psychological tool and an important emblem of power. It is a way of letting every agent know unmistakably who is in charge.
And so, perhaps, the FBI must accept its Ms. Manners - hall monitor role at the same time it serves up press conferences about statistically rare violations by rural militias. Never a nod to policing Israel's spying Sayanim or busting its illegally armed Misgerot.
And of course, stopping the vast wave of real crime that engulfs our cities and makes them unsafe for the Soccer Moms to enter at night simply is not part of the agenda at all.
No matter how humbly the boys in the FBI shuffle, it will never be enough.
Having fun in Occupied America?
http://home.ddc.net/ygg/rj/rj-27.htm
Sometimes they post messages as a "Zoroastrian" (Fake Zoroastrians), who really really 'love' Iran/Persia!
Sometimes they post messages as an anti-arab (Fake arab-haters), who really really 'love' Iran/Persia!
Sometimes they post messages as "Opposition Groups", all of which are connected to the Western Intelligence.
Sometimes they post messages as a defender of "Zahra Kazemi", a filthy "CSIS" agent.
Sometimes they post messages as a defender of Western 'Democracy' (colonialism).
Sometimes they post messages as supporter of dropping nuclear weapons on "Qum", as though, city of Qum is located in Europe!
Sometimes they post messages as defenders of murdering of Iranian Basjis and Sepahis (who bravely defended their homeland), as though, Basjis are Russians!
Sometimes they post messages as supporters of Bush, because he wants nothing but 'FREEDOM' for Iran!
http://www.bushspeaks.com/img/bloody_iraqi_child.jpg
Am I Free Yet, Bush!
Shock and Awe Plan Against Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5f498031b564aaa6
Bush Plan: Nuke Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0f6e4a32e83baa05
Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations 2005
http://www.nukestrat.com/us/jcs/jp.htm
And the most hilarious of all is that sometimes they post messages as supporters of Israel, because Jews hate arabs, so this means they just 'love'! Iran/Persia so so very much!
British Jew Bernard Lewis proposed the dismemberment of Iran as early as 1979
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1a601d2b216ff87d
Jew Edward Nicolae Luttwak push for break-up of Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/3d1f0b79b05e42a1
'American Jewish Committee' pimps war with Iran: The following advert appeared in the Financial Times UK
http://208.42.237.17/Repository/getimage.dll?path=FTU/2006/04/05/11/Img/Pg011.png&GZ=T
AIPAC pimps war with Iran: The video and maps below are intended to help you better understand the escalating threat that is Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons
http://www.aipac.org/iran/nuclear_status/escalating_threat.html
Jewish-American Enterprise Institute (AEI) gives support to anti-Iran terrorists
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/39d298a97ef6ffc8
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5b0804a24ef94611
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/28f23677e3eecb01
Another War for Israel: The amen corner howls for war with Iran
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8663
Jews wants Iran decimated soon, no more excuses!
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/4442df271397453b
What really happened to the Shah of Iran
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/3e88a5bb7ccb3e42
Understanding the Jew demons behind the 1979 coup
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/09e844840aa4f006
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confessions of an ex-Mossad agent: "Victor Ostrovsky"
http://www.eaec.org/dove/dove1990aw/Victor%20Ostrovsky.jpg
Excerpt from Victor Ostrovsky's, "By way of deception" (1990).
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0971759502?v=glance
... The Mossad - believe it or not - has just 30 to 35 case officers, or katsas, operating in the world at any one time. The main reason for this extraordinary low total, as you will read in this book, is that unlike other countries, Israel can tap the significant and loyal cadre of the worldwide Jewish community outside Israel. This is done through a unique system of "Sayanim", volunteer Jewish helpers.
By Way of Deception describes the shocking scope and depth of the Mossad's influence, disclosing how Jewish communities in the U.S., Europe, and South America are armed and trained by the organization in secret "self-defense" units, and how Mossad agents facilitate the drug trade in order to pay the enormous costs of its far-flung, clandestine operation. http://www.victorostrovsky.com/books.html
Among other kinds of dirty tricks in which Mossad also specializes, Ostrovsky asserts that it doctored the file of then-UN Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim to implicate him in Nazi crimes. The doctored file subsequently was "discovered" by then-Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Benyamin Netanyahu to smear Waldheim. The reason? Israel was unhappy with Waldheim's criticism of Israeli activities in southern Lebanon.
Mossad at one time decided to assassinate President George Bush when the president was in Madrid at the end of October 1991 for the opening of Arab-Israeli peace talks; because the American president had frozen U.S. loan guarantees to Israel. Evidence was to be manufactured implicating the Palestinians. Eventually, however, the assassination plot was called off, for reasons Ostrovsky does not explain.
Mossad divides outside Jews into 3 categories:
1) First are the "Sayanim", volunteer spies for Israel.
2) Second is the "Israel lobby", which follows Mossad's guidance.
3) Third is "B'nai B'rith", which can be relied upon to "tarnish as anti-semites
whomever they can't sway to the Israeli cause".
The other side of deception: a rogue agent exposes the Mossad's secret agenda
http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0495/9504058.htm
Victor Ostrovsky's website
http://www.victorostrovsky.com/the_man.html
Operation Trojan
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/deception.html
I was there when the Americans bombed
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/iwasthere.html
Sayanim", volunteer spies for Israel
http://judicial-inc.biz/Sayanim.htm
Victor Ostrovsky
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By_Way_of_Deception
No matter what you do for Jews and no matter how assiduously you toady to their interests, they will never respect yours. "Victor Ostrovsky", Mossad.
Sayan = Millions of Jew-spies around the World.
Katsa = Mossad case officer
kidon = Jew assassins
Misgerot or "frames" = Jew armed groups in other countries.
Vaudat Orchim = Millions of Jew broadcasters, publishers, editors, writers, and
bloggers who spread lies.
OCCUPIED AMERICA - Part I
--------------------------------
SAYANIM
--------------
I dimly recall quite a fuss back in 1959 (I was quite young then) about Jack Kennedy and the question of "dual loyalty". The media declared loudly and publicly that many people questioned whether Kennedy owed his first allegiance to the United States, or to the Vatican.
Even at the tender age of 12, this descendant of Cromwell's round- heads thought concern about loyalty to the Pope a bit overblown.
The Pope seemed a "lord spiritual" in every respect, lacking any of the normal appurtenances of a "lord temporal", such as a standing army. Indeed, if one listened to the Pope or any of his Bishops, it was awfully hard to discern any worldly objective which a president of that faith might entertain that conflict with the worldly interests of the United States.
After all, the Vatican did not receive $5 billions per year in aid from the U.S. Treasury.
Indeed, it was hard to understand why a Catholic should be treated differently from a Methodist or Presbyterian. Kennedy's religion (or lack thereof) seemed far more relevant to the question of his character and the kinds of moral values that might weigh in his decisions. The temporal interests of Rome seemed a bit distant.
Further, conspiracies cannot be concealed for long, and there was no hard evidence of any such thing by the Catholic Church.
Not so with the Jews!
There clearly is at least one international conspiracy, and it is run directly by the State of Israel.
Here is a short quote from the book "By Way of Deception" by Victor Ostrovsky (St. Martin's, 1990), formerly a Colonel in the Israeli intelligence service "Mossad".
Beginning on page 86:
"The next day Ran S. delivered a lecture on the sayanim, a unique and important part of the Mossad's operation. Sayanim - assistants - must be 100% Jewish. They live abroad, and though they are not lsraeli citizens, many are reached through their relatives in Israel.
An Israeli with a relative in England, for example, might be asked to write a letter saying the person bearing the letter represents an organization whose main goal is to help save Jewish people in the diaspora. Could the British relative help in any way?
"There are thousands of sayanim around the world. In London alone, there are about 2000 who are active, and another 5000 on the list. They fulfill many different roles. A car sayan, for example, running a rental agency, could help the Mossad rent a car without having to complete the usual documentation. An apartment sayan would find accommodation without raising suspicions, a bank sayan could get you money if you needed it in the middle of the night, a doctor sayan would treat a bullet wound without reporting it to the police, and so on. The idea is to have a pool of people available when needed who can provide services but will keep quiet about them out of loyalty to the cause. They are paid only costs".
Continuing on page 87
"Suppose during an operation a katsa suddenly had to come up with an electronics store as a cover. A call to a sayan in that business could bring 50 television sets, 200 VCRs - whatever was needed - from his warehouse to your building, and in next to no time, you'd have a store with $3 or $4 million worth of stock in it".
"Since most Mossad activity is in Europe, it may be preferable to have a business address in North America. So, there are address sayanim and telephone sayanim. If a katsa has to give out an address or a phone number, he can use the sayan's. And if the sayan gets a letter or a phone call, he will know immediately how to proceed. Some business Sayanim have a bank of 20 operators answering phones, typing letters, faxing messages, all a front for the Mossad".
And on page 88:
"Katsas in the stations are in charge of the sayanim, and most active sayanim will be visited by a katsa once every three months or so, which for the katsa usually means between two and four face-to-face meetings a day with Sayanim, along with numerous telephone conversations. The system allows the Mossad to work with a skeleton staff. That's why, for example, a KGB station would employ about 100 people, while a comparable Mossad station would need only six or seven."
On page 221, Ostrovsky gives an example of what a Sayan can be expected to do for Israel's Mossad:
"The Mossad already had considerable information about the Exocet, thanks in part to a Sayan who worked at Aerospatiale and had passed along details. They had also conducted a small operation, sending a team to break into the plant accompanied by a missile expert flown in from Israel for the occasion. He was taken into the plant "with handles", and materials brought to him for his expert opinion. His task was to determine what they should photograph. The team spent four and a half hours inside the plant before leaving without a trace".
It is a crime, a felony, for a civilian to participate in spying operations in this manner.
Israel's Mossad is exposing tens of thousands of Jews around the world to considerable legal risk, and the sayanim, being sophisticated business people, surely know this. If that is so, then why does this system work? Why is the risk acceptable?
Here is Ostrovsky's answer from Page 87:
"One thing you know for sure is that even if a Jewish person knows it is the Mossad, he might not agree to work with you-but he won't turn you in. You have at your disposal a non-risk recruitment system that actually gives you a pool of millions of Jewish people to tap from outside your own borders. It's much easier to operate with what is available on the spot, and sayanim offer incredible practical support everywhere".
Now one might suggest that, for example, Great Britain could use a similar system and recruit among WASPS around the world. But they don't, because they can't. It takes an extraordinary degree of racial solidarity and racial motivation for such a "non-risk recruitment system" to work properly. Remember, all of these activities are spying, with long prison terms if caught. Americans of English, Irish and Italian ancestry may have some residual loyalties to the old "mother country". But this residue is nothing like the racial solidarity of the Jews. Such racial feelings are so strong and so pervasive among Jews that the Mossad knew in advance that their recruitment system was "non-risk". Britain, Ireland, Italy and the Vatican know better than to try.
While it may be true that Americans of English, Irish and Italian ancestry have dual loyalties, these white gentile dual loyalties are nothing like the degree of race-based loyalty possessed by the overwhelming majority of Jews. You have it on the authority of Mossad!
Ostrovsky explains, beginning at the bottom of page 122:
"We took the Brits seriously, but everyone in the building used to say they were probably deluded because of "the Bitch". That's what they always called Margaret Thatcher inside the Mossad. They had her tagged as an anti-Semite. There was one simple question asked when anything happened: "Is it good for the Jews or not?" Forget about policies, or anything else. That was the only thing that counted, and depending on the answer, people were called anti-Semites, whether deservedly or not".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The problem is that Jews DO NOT have dual loyalties!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
90% of Jews have a single loyalty. The loyalty is not necessarily to Israel, but to the welfare and power of Jews generally. That is the only thing that matters.
The only question that ever gets asked is; "How will this affect Jews?" No other interests are taken into account at all!
Indeed a corollary of "dual loyalty" is the goyish notion that if you sacrifice to help others, they will reciprocate. If someone helps Jews, there should be a reward.
European gentiles assume that comity and reciprocity are inherent in the psychological makeup of all humanity. Not so, according to Ostrovsky (page 231):
"The relationship between the Mossad and Danish intelligence is so intimate as to be indecent. But it's not the Mossad's virtue that is compromised by the arrangement; it's Denmark's. And that's because the Danish are under the mistaken impression that because they saved a lot of Jews in World War II, the Israelis are grateful and they can trust the Mossad".
No matter what you do for Jews and no matter how assiduously you toady to their interests, they will never respect yours.
That explains why destructive welfare state policies thrive despite 40 years of soaring black illegitimacy rates and the deepening destruction of the black family and community in America. Does the policy harm blacks! Of course! But that is irrelevant. Welfare dependence has created a block that votes 90% for candidates friendly to the welfare state and to Israel. Would blacks be better off as tradesmen and entrepreneurs with stable families? Of course, but then there would be no easy way to control their votes. The hopeless dependency of most blacks increases the political power of Jews. That is why the policy continues.
There is no comity, reciprocity or sense of obligation (dual loyalty) that causes Jews to moderate their attack on America's blacks. Now you might ask why Clinton, the "best friend Israel has ever had at the White House", would sign welfare reform. The answer is the same. The white illegitimacy rate has reached 25%. Millions of white girls in suburban and rural areas are going on AFDC while their skin-head boyfriends camp with them at night.
There is no way our masters are going to use the tax dollars at their disposal to finance the creation of Dr. Pierce's 10 million man army 20 years from now!
It is one thing to fool 40% of Euro-Americans who have jobs and pay taxes into believing they can get something out of the system. It is quite another to subsidize the creation of a dangerous subculture with real dollars. Jews just don't make those kinds of mistakes.
Ways can be found within the bureaucracy to continue welfare to blacks. Hence Hillary Clinton's campaign to "fix" welfare reform.
A classic illustration of this phenomenon comes from a book entitled "Special Tasks" (Little-Brown, 1994, 1995) written by Pavel Sudoplatov and his son Anatoly.
Lieutenant General Pavel Sudoplatov was Joseph Stalin's NKVD director in charge of stealing atomic secrets. He reported directly to Beria.
From page 172:
"The most vital information for developing the first Soviet atomic bomb came from scientists engaged in the Manhattan Project to build the American Atomic Bomb - Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Leo Szilard". Robert Oppenheimer was the director in charge of the Manhattan project.
From page 186-87:
"When it became clear that the atomic project was a heavily guarded, top-secret American priority, Eitingon and I suggested that we use our networks of illegals as couriers for our sources of information. Vassili Zarubin, our Washington rezident, instructed Kheifetz to divorce all intelligence operations from the American Communist party, which we knew would be closely watched by the FBI, and to have Oppenheimer sever all contacts with Communists and left-wingers".
On page 188:
"In 1943, a world-famous actor of the Moscow Yiddish State Art Theatre, Solomon Mikhoels, together with well -known yiddish poet Itzik Feffer, toured the United States on behalf of the Jewish Anti-fascist Committee. Before their departure, Beria instructed Mikhoels and Feffer to emphasize the great Jewish contribution to science and culture in the Soviet Union. Their assignment was to raise money and convince American public opinion that Soviet anti-semitism had been crushed as a result of Stalin's policies. Kheifetz made sure that the message they brought was conveyed to Oppenheimer. Kheifetz said that Oppenheimer, the son of a German-Jewish immigrant, was deeply moved by the information that a secure place for Jews in the Soviet Union was guaranteed. They discussed Stalin's plans to set up a Jewish autonomous republic in the Crimea after the war was won against facism".
Beria understood the psychology of unitary loyalty perfectly!
Continuing on page 189:
"In developing Oppenheimer as a source, Vassili Zarubin's wife, Elizabeth, was essential. She hardly appeared foreign in the United States. Her manner was so natural and sociable that she immediately made friends. Slim, with dark eyes, she had the classic Semitic beauty that attracted both men and women, and she was one of the most successful agent recruiters, establishing her own illegal network of Jewish refugees from Poland, and recruiting one of Szilard's secretaries, who provided technical data".
Oppenheimer's rationale was "fear that the Germans might produce the first atomic bomb". But all he had to do to beat the Germans to the punch was to build the bomb for America. And indeed, that would have been the natural result of "dual loyalties". He could have helped Jews and remained loyal to America at the same time.
But then helping America was not in the calculus at all. As Beria understood perfectly, he was concerned only with one unitary question; "How does this affect Jews?" And the answer was that just as organizing the blacks and browns to vote their antagonistic racial interests is critical to maintaining Jewish power over whites in
the 1990's, giving the atomic secrets to Russia was the one way to reduce the power of whites in America in the 1940s and 50s. Oppenheimer's naive view (prior to the creation of the Israeli State) was that a nuclear armed Russia would provide one more possible haven for Jews with the power to protect them.
The Goyim in our OSS (the forerunner of the CIA) would have assumed "dual loyalty" and concluded that Oppenheimer presented no security risk.
They were dead wrong, as Beria clearly understood.
So now the question becomes: - How many sayanim does it take to "occupy America"?
Is Madeline Kerbel Albright (nominee for Secretary of State) a Sayan?
Is William Cohen (nominee for Secretary of Defense) a Sayan?
Is William Berger (nominee for National Security Agency chief) a Sayan?
Is Anthony Lake (nominee to head CIA) a Sayan?
Is Robert Rubin (secretary of Treasury) a Sayan?
Is Alan Greenspan (chairman of the Federal Reserve) a Sayan?
Are these reasonable questions to ask?
In truth, of course, it is somewhat unlikely that these people, by far the most powerful group in the United States, would agree to spend their time schlepping TV sets for Mossad, or divulging secrets. They can do far more to serve Jewish interests by guiding U.S. economic, diplomatic and defense policies to serve Israel and Jewish interests than they ever could through risky behaviors like divulging classified data.
In fact, these people are in a far better position to put pressure on Israel than Israel is to put pressure them.
Are the people named above capable of articulating U.S. interests (as opposed to Jewish interests) on an intellectual level?
Of course! Quite skillfully, in fact!
Are they capable of acting upon those interests (our interests)?
That is a much tougher question. For a majority, it appears that the answer is clearly "no" if Jewish insterests might also be involved. The psychological and emotional ties within the group are so strong, and they are so powerfully alienated from the white gentile majority that their decisions and actions will never match their words. Just as Oppenheimer's actions failed to square with his words.
Clinton's cabinet and the media moguls who control him are likely to have their own strong views on the question "Is it good for Jews, or not?" And they are not likely to take orders from Israel. Does that mean there is no "conspiracy'?
Other than the publicly documented spying and extortion operations run by the State of Israel, there probably isn't one. Rather, what we have is an obsessive concern for the interests of Jews and a psychological inability to represent the interests of others that is shared by such an overwhelming majority of Jews, that their uncoordinated actions appear pre-planned.
Colonel Ostrovsky notes in "By way of Deception" that Israel and its supporters have a concept of the relation between media and government that is powerfully at odds with our own Anglo-Saxon tradition that inspired the First Amendment.
From page 290:
"As usual in these affairs, the journalism fraternity in Israel knew about the operation all along-or at least, they knew what the Mossad and the prime minister's office wanted them to know - but they agreed to withhold the story until they were given leave to print it. There is a committee of editors, called the Vaudat Orchim,
of all the major media outlets in Israel that meets regularly with government officials for background briefing on current events. Israeli television is government controlled, as is all but one rogue radio station, so that broadcasting is never a problem to control".
The Jewish - SDS flirtation with "free speech" at Berkeley in the 1960's was a temporary romance of convenience. Culturally, they are more comfortable with a "Vaudat Orchim" and controlled news.
Is Laurence Tisch (CEO of CBS,) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Robert Sarnoff (RCA and NBC) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
How about Jeff Zuker (executive producer of NBC Nightly news)?
Is Jeff Sagansky (head of CBS entertainment division) a Sayan? A member of a Vaudat Orchim?
Is Stuart Bloomberg (head of entertainment programming at ABC) a Sayan? How about Vaudat Orchim?
Is Brandon Tartikoff (Paramount Pictures) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Gerald Levin (Time Warner Communications) a Sayan? Perhaps part of a Vaudat Orchim?
Is Michael D. Eisner (Walt Disney Co.) a Sayan? Or a Vaudat Orchim member?
Is Martin S. Davis (Paramount Communications) a Sayan? Or a Vaudat Orchim, perhaps?
Is Peter Chernin (20th Century Fox Film Corp.) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
How about Sandy Grushow (Fox Entertainment)? Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Peter Guber (Columbia Pictures Entertainment) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Sumner Redstone [Murray Rothstein] (Viacom, MTV, Nickelodeon) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
Is Lew Wasserman (MCA Inc.) a Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Is Ron Nessen (MBS radio news) a Sayan? - or a Vaudat Orchim?
How about Samuel and Donald Newhouse (31 newspapers, 12 broadcast stations, 87 cable systems, Parade, New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, etc.)?
Sayanim?
Is Arthur Ochs Sulzberger (New York Times, 33 additional papers, 7 radio and TV broadcasters a cable company and three book publishers) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
Is Katherine Meyer Graham (Washington Post, Newsweek) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
Is Peter Kann (Dow Jones & Co, Wall Street journal) a Sayan? A Vaudat Orchim?
How about Mortimer B. Zuckerman (New York Daily News, U.S. News &World Report, Atlantic Monthly)? Sayan? Vaudat Orchim?
Do these people, and dozens more in similar positions meet to discuss how to manage the news? Again, the truth is probably not. Why?
Simple. They already know what messages must be censored and what events are newsworthy. They already know what to cover and what to leave on the cutting room floor. Except on rarest occasions, they do not need to be told what to do.
Each of these men will have his own passionately held convictions about what kinds of news and entertainment for goyim will best serve Jewish interests. These are not the type of men who would obediently follow instructions from Isreal. But then the deep racial paranoia and the intense loathing of Christianity that is taught to most Jews as children at the dinner table ensures that many Jews will pursue careers in media (such careers are "good for Jews") and will know what to do when they get to the top of a network. They generally do not need to be told!
And that, gentlemen, is the significance of "unitary racial loyalty" that exists among 90% of this world's Jews.
Pat Buchanan once referred to Capitol Hill as "Israeli Occupied Territory".
Can we justifiably say that we live in "Occupied America?"
No need to make up your minds yet. Might as well wait for parts two and three of the "Occupied America" series.
Then you can be the judge!
http://home.ddc.net/ygg/rj/rj-26.htm
OCCUPIED AMERICA - Part II
--------------------------------
MISGEROT
---------------
In part one of this "Occupied America" series, we discussed the network of Sayanim; - tens of thousands of Jews throughout the world who assist Israel's Mossad in gathering intelligence.
We saw how most gentiles view this activity as a sign of "dual loyalty", in that Jews will have a loyalty to their native countries and to Israel, and that the loyalty to Israel is what prompts them to serve as Sayanim.
However, if you think about it, "dual loyalties" would create considerable risk for Mossad. It would be impossible for them to know in advance the strength of the "non-Israel" loyalty, and whether it might be strong enough to cause Jews they approach to turn agents in. (All of this activity is a serious felony in virtually all countries inwhich it takes place).
However, Victor Ostrovsky, author of "By Way of Deception" quite candidly states that the existence of millions of Jews outside the borders of Israel gives Mossad a "non-risk recruitment tool":
"One thing you know for sure is that even if a Jewish person knows it is the Mossad, he might not agree to work with you - but he won't turn you in. You have at your disposal a non-risk recruitment system that actually gives you a pool of millions of Jewish people to tap from outside your own borders".
Now for this system to be "non-risk" these millions of Jews around the world must have only a single loyalty - loyalty to Jews and their interests. In the words of Ostrovsky:
"There was one simple question asked when anything happened: "Is it good for the Jews or not?" Forget about policies, or anything else. That was the only thing that counted... "
As an example of how this unitary or "single loyalty" works, we then examined the case of Robert Oppenheimer, director of the Manhattan Project, and father of the American atomic bomb, who passed atomic secrets to Russia.
Finally, the prior post listed all of those eligible to be Sayanim in cabinet level positions in our government, and at the very top of all of our major mass media, thus setting forth a prima facie case that America is, in fact, occupied by an alien power. The means, motive and opportunity clearly exist, as does the corpus delicti of a decaying and rudderless America.
In this installment, we are going to examine the heavily armed Jewish groups established and run by retired Mossad officers throughout the world, as a means of examining the question whether this is "Occupied America".
From "By Way of Deception" (St. Martins, 1990) Page 291:
"Arbel's department was responsible for setting up Jewish defense groups, called "frames", or Misgerot, all over the world, now including some parts of the United States, where anti-semitism is regarded as a threat. Often people with particular skills, such as doctors, are on reserve and called in for short periods to help with these frames. Normally, heads of the stations for the frames in the various countries are retired Mossad workers. The job is widely regarded as a sort of bonus for faithful service, a tshupar, the idea being that they've got all this expertise, why not use it?"
"The main job is to help the leaders of Jewish communities outside Israel plan for their own security. Part of this is done through the hets w-keshet, or "bow and arrow", Israel's paramilitary youth brigades. While all Israeli youths, boys and girls, belong to this "eduday noar ivry", or "battalion of Hebrew youth", often youths from other countries are brought over to spend the summer learning about security, picking up such skills as completing obstacle courses, pitching tents, and learning how to use a sniper rifle and Uzi assault rifle. Still others learn upgraded security skills, such as how to build a slick, for hiding weapons or documents, when and how to do security checks, as well as thefundamentals of investigation and intelligence gathering.
"Any use of the frames other than for self-protection has never been approved by any government official, although Mossad officials all know of such use. Thus, Yitzhak Shamir knew, but Peres, never a Mossad man, would not have known, even though he was prime minister. Israel does not sell the weapons directly to these foreign frames, but it does provide arms indirectly in a round-about arrangement with known arms dealers.
"The Mossad does not see these frames as information gatherers, although the station heads know from experience that the shortest route to getting praise is by supplying useful information. Many of the youths trained at the summer camps in Israel later become Sayanim, and it certainly provides a strong group of willing helpers, well trained, undaunted by the lingo, who have already shown the ability to take chances...."
Page 140:
"We were now also learning about Tsafririm and the "frames" set up as a defense mechanism by Jews around the world. In this area we had a problem, or at least some of us did. I just couldn't agree with this concept of having guard groups everywhere. I thought frames in England, for example, where kids learn how to build slicks for their weapons to protect their synagogues, were more dangerous than beneficial to the Jewish community. I brought up the argument that even if a group of people had been oppressed, with attempts made to exterminate them - as with the Jews - they had no right to act obstructively in democratic countries. I could understand this happening in Chile or Argentina, or any other country where people disappear off the streets, but not in England or France or Belgium.
"The fact that there are antisemitic groups, whether real or imaginary, is definitely not an excuse, because if you look into Israel's own backyard, you'll see anti-Palestinian groups. Did this mean we thought the Palestinians therefore had the right to store weapons and organize vigilante groups? Or would we call them terrorists?"
Let's summarize:
-----------------------
* Israel maintains armed groups within our borders.
* These groups are run by agents of a foreign power. (retired Mossad officers).
* Jewish youths from all over the world are flown to Israel to learn how to use machine guns and sniper rifles.
* Once in Israel, these youths receive this training as part of the "battalions of Hebrew youth", Israel's version of the Hitler Yungend.
* Israel smuggles full-automatic weapons to these groups through arms dealers.
* Retired Mossad agents supervise this activity and keep them out of trouble.
Three conditions must obtain before we can conclude that a country is "occupied" by a foreign power. These three conditions or symptoms of occupation must be clear.
* First, the occupier must hold commanding positions in the government and in the media.
* Second, the occupied police forces follow the agenda of the occupiers and ignore the illegal acts of occupation.
* Third, the occupier must control the electoral process and exact tribute from the occupied.
Maintaining armed cells throughout the Western world under the direction of foreign agents is profoundly illegal. Our FBI certainly knows about these Misgerot or "frames" but they do nothing about them.
No informants, no infiltrators, no arrests, no armed confrontations - nothing!
Nothing, that is, except deafening silence.
It is obviously not an enforcement priority.
Only the spy Pollard was apprehended and then only because Pollard was completely out of control. His copying of classified documents was so prodigious as to become an embarrassment to his Israeli handlers.
His discovery, as well as the revelations of Ostrovsky, had absolutely zero effect on our FBI. The only reasonable inferences to be drawn from these facts are:
That the FBI already knew who it works for;
That only a small number of people who read books would find out about these disclosures; and
That the people the FBI work for would remain in power, and that no change in enforcement policy is necessary.
It is ironic. The Soviet Union used the Communist party to spy in America back in the 1940's and 1950's. But they never dared flout U.S. law by arming the communist cells they controlled. Israel's activity is so absolutely and shockingly brazen that it leaves one breathless. The lack of response from our own law enforcement agencies is stunning silent testimony to the reason why Israel and its U.S. loyalists can openly ignore our laws.
Indeed, it is similar in many ways to the scene at Florence and Normandy during the Los Angeles riots. As Reginald Denny was having his brains beat out, a dozen armed police in three cars slowly and quietly backed away from the intersection. It was all captured on camera.
The message was clear. You white citizens are on your own! Do not expect us to protect you, even when we have the clear and overwhelming power to do so.
Message understood, boys!
What we get instead is Feinstein in the Senate and Schumer in the House ranting about how "uncomfortable" they feel living in a country in which people have guns, and trying to convince the middle class to be uncomfortable also. Their discomfort with people owning guns is clearly selective. No mention of the Misgerot, with their full-automatic (and clearly illegal) Uzi's. Jews owning guns is comforting - gentiles owning guns is not!
Our FBI follows the Schumer - Feinstein agenda by assigning thousands of agents to monitor anti-government types. They send out hundreds of informants and provocateurs hoping to talk unsophisticated whites into selling guns or exploding bombs on their own property.
Not surprisingly, they are occasionally successful.
They have enough success that the press is supplied with lurid stories about militias and bombs so that middle class Euro-America will think that the anti-government opposition is physically dangerous and threatening to them.
It is a happy marriage of law-enforcement with news management. They are new at this game, so occasionally they will make public relations mistakes, as with the Waco assault and the killing of Vickie Weaver. But supervisors are reprimanded and reassigned until more media savvy types can be found to replace them.
The fact that our FBI has never busted a Sayan or a Misgerot gives you a pretty clear idea of who they work for. It is a necessary pre-condition of "occupied" status.
But apparently their masters are not happy with mere obedience and loyal service. They demand degradation and humiliation as well.
Several years ago, our FBI was assigned the task of monitoring and analyzing "hate crimes". In an article published by USA Today on February 4, 1996, the FBI announced its statistics. There were 7947 hate crimes. 41% of the hate crimes were "intimidation". Another 23% were vandalism or spray painting.
Intimidation?
Our FBI has been assigned the task of monitoring name-calling.
Shouting an epithet at someone from across the street has become a "hate crime" in these United States of the Offended. And of course the graffiti that graces much of our urban landscape in these United States of the Offended has also become a "hate crime" if it contains politically incorrect thoughts or lands on a synagogue.
Our FBI has been reduced to Kindergarten hall monitors ever on the alert for politically incorrect insults.
There are 5 million assaults (unlawful beatings) committed each year in the United States. Blacks commit 7.2 times more interracial assaults than whites. When you correct for the fact that blacks comprise 12% of the population, it is 50 times more likely that a black will assault a white than it is for a white to assault a black.
So apparently, assigning the FBI the job of monitoring and gathering statistics on name calling and politically incorrect midnight artistry provides the media with the basic feedstock required to convince the soccer moms that it is the poor whites with anti-government views who are the dangerous criminals.
At the same time, of course, the Bureau of Justice Statistics has decided to stop gathering data on the race of crime perpetrators and victims. Too much grist for the internet!
An occupying power will seek to degrade those who obey its command. Like mandatory "sensitivity training", making the FBI cross dress as Ms. Manners is an important psychological tool and an important emblem of power. It is a way of letting every agent know unmistakably who is in charge.
And so, perhaps, the FBI must accept its Ms. Manners - hall monitor role at the same time it serves up press conferences about statistically rare violations by rural militias. Never a nod to policing Israel's spying Sayanim or busting its illegally armed Misgerot.
And of course, stopping the vast wave of real crime that engulfs our cities and makes them unsafe for the Soccer Moms to enter at night simply is not part of the agenda at all.
No matter how humbly the boys in the FBI shuffle, it will never be enough.
Having fun in Occupied America?
http://home.ddc.net/ygg/rj/rj-27.htm
Message has been deleted
0 new messages