@@ British false-flag operation blown wide open @@
Arash
September 20, 2005
Fake Terrorism Is a Coalition's Best Friend
Iraqi police recently caught two terrorists with a car full of explosives. Would it
surprise you to learn they were British Special Forces?
By Matt Hutaff
The story sounds amazing, almost fantastical.
A car driving through the outskirts of a besieged city opens fire on a police
checkpoint, killing one. In pursuit, the police surround and detain the drivers and
find the vehicle packed with explosives – perhaps part of an insurgent's plan to
destroy lives and cripple property. If that isn't enough, when the suspects are
thrown in prison their allies drive right up to the walls of the jail, break through
them and brave petroleum bombs and burning clothes to rescue their comrades. 150
other prisoners break free in the ensuing melee.
Incredible, no? Yet this story took place in the southern Iraqi city of Basra
recently. Violence continues to escalate in the breakout's aftermath... just not for
the reasons you think.
You see, the drivers of the explosive-laden car were not members of an insurgency
group – they were British Special Forces (SAS). Their rescuers? British soldiers
driving British tanks.
That's right – two members of the British Armed forces disguised as Arab civilians
killed a member of the Iraqi police while evading capture. When the people of Basra
rightfully refused to turn the murderers over to the British government, per
Coalition "mandate", they sent their own men in and released over 100 prisoners in
the process.
Winning the hearts and minds, aren't we?
Sadly, this story is really not all that surprising. After hearing countless accounts
of using napalm and torture against innocent civilians in addition to the other daily
abuses dished out by American overseers, the thought of British scheming seems
perfectly reasonable.
British caught in a "black-ops" mission
So what we have here is a clear instance of a foreign power attempting to fabricate a
terrorist attack.
Why else would the soldiers be dressed as Arabs if not to frame them? Why have a car
laden with explosives if you don't plan to use them for destructive purposes? Iraq is
headed towards civil war, and this operation was meant to accelerate the process by
killing people and blaming others. Nothing more, nothing less.
http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/afp/20050920/capt.sge.jqj72.200905181322.photo01.photo.default-384x209.jpg
British Special Forces caught in a car full of explosives dressed as Arabs planned to
kill civilians and then blame the insurgents! This is called a false-flag operation.
That the British army staged an over-the-top escape when it could rely on normal
diplomatic channels to recover its people proves that.
Such extreme methods highlight the need to keep secrets.
There have been a number of insurgent bombings in Iraq recently. Who really is
responsible for the bloodshed and destruction? The only tangible benefit of the
bombings is justification for Coalition forces maintaining the peace in Iraq. Who
benefits from that? Certainly not the Iraqis – they already believe most suicide
bombings are done by the United States to prompt religious war. After reading about
this incident, I'm not inclined to disagree.
Even though this false-flag operation was blown wide open, I'm afraid it might still
be used in the mainstream media to incite further violence in the Middle East.
Judging by the coverage that has emerged after the incident, my fears seem warranted.
http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/rids/20050919/i/r798243463.jpg
British soldier jumping from a burning tank in the southern Iraqi city of Basra.
Several articles have already turned the story against the angry Iraqis who fought
the British tanks as they demolished the jail wall, painting them as aggressive Shia
militia attacking the doe-eyed, innocent troops responding to the concern that their
comrades were held by religious fanatics.
A photograph of a troop on fire comes complete with commentary that the vehicles were
under attack during a "bid to recover arrested servicemen" that were possibly
undercover. All criminal elements of British treachery are downplayed, the car's
explosive cache is never mentioned and the soldiers who instigated the affair are
made victims of an unstable country they are defending.
Blame it on Iran trick
Hilariously, all of this spin has already landed Iran at the top of the blame game.
Because when the war combine botches its own clandestine terrorist acts, what better
way to recover than by painting the soulless, freedom-hating country you'd love to
invade next as the culprit?
In a way, I almost admire the nerve of officials who are able to infer that Basra's
riots have nothing to do with fake insurgent bombing raids and everything to do with
religious ties to a foreign country. It's a sheer unmitigated gall that flies in the
face of logic and reason.
"The Iranians are careful not to be caught", a British official said as the UK
threatened to refer Iran to the UN Security Council for sanctions. Too bad the
British aren't! Maybe then they'd be able to complete their black-ops mission without
looking like complete fools in the process!
Make no mistake – any and all violence to erupt from Basra over this incident lands
squarely on the shoulders of the British army and its special forces. Instead of
stoking the flames of propaganda against a nation it has no hope of ever conquering,
maybe Britain should quit trying to intimidate the Iraqis with fear and torture and
start focusing on fixing its mistakes and getting out of the Middle East.
These actions are inexcusable and embarrassing; however, they should make you think.
If a country like the United Kingdom is willing to commit acts of terror, what kind
of false-flag operations do you think the United States is capable of?
If you thought the U.S. wouldn't blow up people it claims to support in the hopes of
advancing its agenda, think again. Use this incident as your first reference point.