The latest Orwellian Big Lie to hit America is the Boston Marathon psy-op. Here is Craig McKee’s new piece on the “boat confession”

[Crickets]

"PSY OPS is what happens when Jews take over your government."
--Bongblaster

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you believe this anthrax letter was from a Muslim, you’ll probably
also believe in “Dzokhar’s boat confession.”

Dzhokhar’s boat ‘confession’ the most unbelievable part yet of Boston
psyop
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/21/dzhokhars-boat-confession-the-most-unbelievable-part-yet-of-boston-psyop/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=dzhokhars-boat-confession-the-most-unbelievable-part-yet-of-boston-psyop
By Craig McKee (Truth and Shadows)

Remember the notes that accompanied the anthrax deliveries right after
9/11? They said things like, “Allah is great!” “Death to Israel,”
“Death to America!” and “9-11-01: This is next.”

In other words, THE MUSLIMS DID IT: the same ones who had so handily
defeated the world’s greatest military machine on Sept. 11, 2001. And
they did it because they hate us and our freedoms … the usual. They
apparently really wanted to rub salt in the wounds of a traumatized
America after the largest supposed terrorist attack ever on U.S. soil.
And it worked; people were suitably freaked out.

The problem was that the Muslims didn’t carry out the anthrax attacks,
which was later proven by the fact that the anthrax was highly
weaponized and was manufactured at a U.S. military facility. The whole
thing was later pinned on American scientist Bruce Edward Ivins after
he had allegedly committed suicide. We also learned that Bush, Cheney
and other key administration officials were put on the anthrax-
preventing antibiotic Cipro in early September 2001, long before the
anthrax attacks happened.

Funny they thought of that precaution but didn’t think of evacuating
the Pentagon when a plane was supposedly heading right for it on 9/11.

So Muslims didn’t do the anthrax, just as the evidence clearly shows
they didn’t do 9/11.

Now we have an oh-so-convenient “confession” by Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to
handily explain his motives for the Boston Marathon bombing.
Apparently, Dzhokhar wrote a kind of claim of responsibility on the
inside of the boat where he was hiding, using a marker he “found” (no
paper was handy, so he wrote it on the cabin wall as he bled from
multiple gunshot wounds).

The note has all the key Muslims-are-to-blame talking points. Here are
some of the things, paraphrased, that Dzhokhar is supposed to have
written:

¦When you attack one Muslim, you attack all Muslims
¦We’re getting you back for killing Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan
¦The innocent victims in Boston are collateral damage just as Muslims
are in U.S. wars
¦I don’t mourn my brother because he is a martyr in paradise, where I
expect to be soon. (How did he know for sure his brother was dead?)
We learned of this note in a CBS News report on May 16 during which
Charlie Rose and his grinning sidekick Norah O’Donnell speak with
“senior correspondent” John Miller, a former FBI assistant director.
This CBS “scoop” came a full month after the bombing because, Miller
suggests, the note was “…the thing that investigators never found
anywhere else.”

Ahh … let me get this straight. They didn’t examine the boat where
Dzhokhar spent his last several hours of freedom for possible evidence
at the time? Really? And when they did, they magically came up with
the familiar “death to America” justification that so often
accompanies these false flag events.

The ironic ending to the report comes when O’Donnell mentions that the
note itself ended up being riddled with hundreds of bullet holes,
which Miller confirms, saying: “The note has those holes in it.”

No kidding.

Here are the four major elements of this false flag event and how the
official story fails to hold up in each case:

The exercise

The most obvious sign that Boston was a false flag operation is the
bomb “exercise” that was going on at the exact same location and time
as the actual bombing. This has become a tell-tale sign of false
flags, particularly since 9/11 when numerous exercises were taking
place that morning that simulated the very thing that happened.

The most absurd example is the 7/7 London bombings when a simulation
of the bombing of three underground stations was going on as those
same stations were actually being bombed (not to mention a real bus
bomb that was also reflected in the exercise).

The pattern was repeated with the mass shooting in Norway in 2011, the
Aurora movie theater shooting in July 2012, and the Sandy Hook school
shooting in December 2012.

In Boston on April 15, loudspeakers announced to the crowd near the
finish line of the Marathon that they needn’t worry about the bomb
squad and their bomb-sniffing dogs patrolling the area during the race
because it was just an exercise.

Then there were the “contractors” wearing black jackets and caps,
beige pants, and black backpacks. It has been alleged that they were
from the private, CIA-linked security firm Craft International. Their
presence in Boston has been denied but the photographic evidence
confirms that they were there.

The carnage

There are so many questions and anomalies concerning the actual
destruction and death that we’ve been told came from the bombing. I
do, however, want to make it clear at this point that I am not saying
no bombs went off or that no one was really hurt. The event may well
have been a combination of real victims and fake ones. It also seems
to have involved a wild exaggeration of the number of injured. We’re
told there were as many as 264 people were hurt but the photo evidence
does not support this.

We’ve also been presented with an obviously fake story of “heroism” as
Carlos Arredondo wheeled Jeff Bauman, the man who supposedly had his
legs blown off, down the street past photographers. It is actually the
Bauman part of the story that makes it most clear that the whole event
was not what it was made out to be. This topic was addressed in detail
in the last Truth and Shadows post, written by Sheila Casey.

First, I do not believe the image that has been burned into everyone’s
mind – of Bauman being pushed down the street in wheelchair – came
about by accident. It too perfectly achieved all that the real
perpetrators could have wished for: a human face on the horror and a
hero who would overcome all odds to triumph over evil.

I find it impossible to believe that a man who had his legs blown off
would be left lying on the ground for several minutes while others
with seemingly minor injuries were attended to. There were gurneys and
ambulances, but not for Jeff. He was just left there.

Arrendondo supposedly came to the rescue (he claims to have rushed to
Jeff’s aid although video clearly shows he was more preoccupied with
wrestling with the fence than with helping anyone). So much of
Arredondo’s story is proven false by the photos and video. He says
Bauman’s shirt was on fire, but there’s no evidence of this. He also
says all the flags were blown over by the blast: not true. And the
bloody American flag he unfurled for cameras? Yes, we get the
symbolism.

And then there is the blood. At no time do we see any blood coming
from Bauman’s legs even when they were draped over the shoulders of a
woman who was wearing a white top. This woman was later transported in
an ambulance while Bauman was apparently left behind. When she was
wheeled away, there was plenty of blood on her. But where did it come
from? And the blood on the sidewalk (as shown in some of the photos,
anyway) is a bright red color that looks a lot more like paint than
blood.

We have the mysterious hooded man (who has been identified as
Christian Williams) who appeared to be working on Bauman’s lower body
in some way. Was he coming to his medical aid or was he affixing some
kind of prosthetic? This same man was later attended to by medical
personnel as he lay on the ground. Shortly before that, he’d been
propped up on his elbow, looking quite casual and not very badly hurt
(no, there’s no proof he wasn’t hurt). According to the New York
Times, however, Williams has had four operations on his legs since the
event. He and his friend, Caroline Reinsch, have a fundraising web
page and has received more than $100,000 so far. Jeff Baumans’ page
has raised more than $760,000.

There is also the comical photo of a victim walking down the street
whose clothes had all sorts of slices in them, while he didn’t appear
to be injured.

The pursuit

Nothing about the identification and pursuit of the Tsarnaev brothers
passes the smell test. We learned early on that these two had been
identified as prime suspects, in part because legless victim Bauman
identified one of the brothers as having set a backpack on the ground
just before the blast.

Initially, the FBI released surveillance video of Tamerlan and
Dzhokhar with plea for help in identifying them. Later we found that
the brothers – and particularly older brother Tamerlan – were well
known to the FBI. So they appeared to be lying about not knowing who
these two were.

Fact is, most people are convinced the brothers are guilty because of
how they allegedly reacted violently when they were pursued. (“If they
are innocent, why did they shoot it out with the cops?” is how it
goes.) But how much of that story stands up – or makes sense? The
story of the shootout involving police and Dzhokhar – who was hiding
in a boat – turns out to be a lie.

We were told by police commissioner Ed Davis that there was an
exchange of gunfire between Dzhokhar and police that led to his
capture. At the end of the shootout, the story goes, Dzhokhar may have
shot himself in the throat on purpose (huh?). Later, a police
spokesman said the throat wound looked more like a knife wound than a
bullet wound.

Now we know he was unarmed and that police riddled the boat with
bullets unilaterally. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/24/boston-
bombing-suspect-unarmed_n_3150723.html)

Oh yes, and the owner of the boat is quoted as saying he looked into
the boat and saw a pool of blood. But photographs taken the next day
show only a small amount of blood where Dzhokhar would have climbed
out (and it’s highly the police would have cleaned up the blood by the
next day – especially when we can plainly see a small amount blood on
the outside of the boat).

We’re told that Dzhokhar drove over Tamerlan’s body while escaping
after shooting and hurling explosives at police. But did Tamelan
really die in the shootout or after being run over? A video surfaced
that showed a man looking awfully like Tamerlan, handcuffed and naked,
being placed in a police car. Dan Dicks of Press for Truth reports
that he spoke to the brothers’ aunt, Maret Tsarnaeva, who said that
the man in the video was absolutely 100% her nephew.

If true, this means that Tamerlan was murdered while in police
custody.

And think about this: the brothers are cornered by police after a
massive manhunt, and one, Dzhokhar, is allowed to escape in a car? He
ditches the vehicle and then runs away? Boy, it’s darned lucky we had
the whole martial law thing going. Regular cop tactics just weren’t
enough with these masterminds.

Alleging that Dzhokhar drove over his brother did make him seem less
human, but is it at all believable? We later heard from an eyewitness
that it was police who drove over Tamerlan’s body. And, according to
Infowars.com, the brothers may have been trying to surrender to
police. And, for some bizarre reason, the brothers stood in the light
of the headlights of their car as they exchanged fire with police. We
were told they had a veritable arsenal of weapons, including
explosives, but then later that turned into one gun between the two of
them.

In fact, authorities say the brothers killed MIT cop Sean Collier
because they were short one gun. That’s right, they shot him in the
head because they needed his gun. This was their escape plan. If all
this is true, then these guys really must have wanted to get caught.
So far, we haven’t been given any hard evidence at all to support the
accusation that the cop was killed by one of the brothers. (http://
news.yahoo.com/final-shootout-then-boston-bombing-suspect-
caught-112744657.html)

It reminds me of the murder of Officer J.D. Tippitt in Dallas on Nov.
22, 1963. That was pinned on Lee Harvey Oswald even though
eyewitnesses said two men got out of a car, shot Tippitt, and then
drove away (for more on this, check out Mark Lane’s recent book, The
Last Word). In the public mind, the extra murder solidifies the
public’s belief in the guilt of the suspects.

The Tsarnaev brothers are supposed to have committed a carjacking
after shooting Collier, and they even told the driver they had done
the bombing. The alleged victim told police that the brothers only let
him live because he wasn’t American. And while he didn’t understand
what they were saying, he heard them say “Manhattan” several times.
How convenient is that? How convenient is all this evidence.

Oh yeah, the carjacking victim escaped while the brothers were getting
“snacks” at a gas station. I guess we just have to take his word for
that.

We were told the brothers had shot Transit Police Officer Richard
Donohue during their shootout with police. But it was later admitted
that Donohue had been killed by police “friendly fire.” We were also
told the brothers had robbed a convenience store. Then we were told
they didn’t do that either. (http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/04/19/
tsarnaev-brothers-didnt-rob-a-7-eleven-spokesperson/)

The connections

So it turns out that the brothers were well known to U.S.
intelligence, including the FBI, which interviewed Tamerlan in 2011.
The boys’ mother, Zubeidat Tsarnaeva, says the FBI had been watching
their family for years and had even been in their home, telling her
that her eldest son, Tamerlan, was a dangerous extremist. She was
quoted in minds.com as saying:

“He was controlled by the FBI, like for three, five years,” she said.
”They knew what my son was doing, they knew what actions and what
sites on the Internet he was going [to], they used to come…and talk to
me…they were telling me that he was really a serious leader and they
were afraid of him.”

Both of the brothers’ parents claim their sons are being set up, with
their mother saying the FBI had been in touch with Tamerlan for years.
In an article in Global Research, Bill Van Auken makes this telling
statement:

“While much remains murky about these and other issues, one thing is
clear: the Boston bombing, like virtually every other major terrorist
incident, real or invented, since the September 11, 2001 attacks on
New York City and Washington, was carried out by someone who was known
to and under surveillance by US intelligence agencies.”

And perhaps most significant are the connections between the brothers,
their uncle, Ruslan Tsarni (who called them “losers” on TV even though
he hadn’t seen either of them in several years), and the CIA. Tsarni,
it has come out, was married to the daughter of a senior CIA official,
Graham Fuller. He even lived at Fuller’s home.

In another Global Research article, F. William Engdahl writes:

“Is it mere “coincidence” that the uncle of the two young men accused
of the Boston bombings was related in marriage to the CIA figure who
advocated using the networks which were later named “Al Qaeda” across
Central Asia including Chechnya where the Tsarnaev brothers had
roots?”

How I learned to stop worrying and love martial law

There are a number of clues that make clear that this was a story
contrived to play on our emotions. We can start by looking at the
results: this theatrical event creates a contrived coming together of
the population “in the face of tragedy.” Boston Strong? Who thought up
that bit of branding? anyone? This makes me thing of Wag the Dog and
the “Good Old Shoe” song that was written, recorded, and placed in the
Library of Congress as if it had been there for decades. The Boston
slogan, and the song, were clearly intended to create some of that
artificial warmth.

People come together to celebrate their strength and resilience based
upon a lie. (As Sheila Casey said to me, the tragedy of it creates a
kind of “feel-good” bonding situation that people don’t want
interfered with). Hence the anger expressed when anyone challenges the
story (“How dare you disrespect the victims by questioning the
facts?”)

The pattern from Sandy Hook is repeated: media reporting
misinformation that they should not have until they knew it was right.
These are just too blatant to be honest mistakes. Either the younger
brother drove over his brother or he didn’t. Either there was a pool
of blood in the boat or there wasn’t. Why do we keep getting dozens of
unconfirmed facts from unnamed sources that turn out to be false? In
my experience of reporting on crime stories, police do not throw out
“rumours” or guesses about things for public consumption.

The news media, of course, pour flames on the emotional fire while
keeping us distracted from clear facts that show that we’re cheering
as much for a script as for a triumph over real adversity.

Because the whole event is swept up in a wave of emotion, anyone who
questions the facts is seen as an intruder in the “overcoming-tragedy”
presentation. We are told that we are disrespecting the victims, that
we should leave the “conspiracy crap” for a later time (or cut it out
altogether). What an effective way to marginalize anyone who dares to
question the story or use their brain in any way.

And the point of all this?

Martial law is imposed where people are forced to stay in their homes,
businesses are forced to close, and an army of police (who look just
like soldiers) go door to door searching houses and forcing
inhabitants out at gunpoint with their hands up. Only a well-planned
psyop could turn this into a patriotic event instead of the ominous
precedent that it was.

And now that we’ve been introduced to the reality of martial law – and
we seemed to like it – we’re likely to be seeing it again very soon.

4

Related Posts:
¦Tsarnaev Brothers: 9/11 Truthers – and Obviously Innocent
¦CIA’s Graham Fuller, connected to Tsarnaevs -9/11 cover-up
¦WTC “Boeing landing gear”: Lamest planted evidence ever?
¦The Brothers Tsarnaev: The Lee Harvey Oswalds of the Boston bombings?
¦100 Critical Points About 9/11
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=252537

...
D E A T H T O A M E R I C A ! ...was the birth of Israel.