PM Cameron had to cancel a planned trip to China ! The French president, François Hollande accorded a state visit ...by Xi Jinping. China and France will work for a new world order !!!

[baldeagle]

PM Cameron planned to visit China early this month...to hold the
scheduled annual summit with the Chinese leadership. BUT the leaders
in Beijing have no plan to meet him.

PM Cameron had to cancel his travel plan to Beijing earlier this
month,...to boost the sales of British products to the Chinese. His
foreign policy of boosting trade with China suffered a black eye
blow.
After telling the British ...no visit at this time, Xi JinPing welcome
the French president, François Hollande to Beiing honouring him with
the trappings of a State Visit.
At the meeting in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China,

Hollande and Xi pledged to push for a world free of domination by any
superpower... a "multipolar" world. They would actively promote a
multipolar world and the democratization of international relations.

According to British media, Cameron was punished for meeting the
Dalai Lama. If this was true,..it means that Xi Jinping does not
tolerate people who do not treat China seriously.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/26/blow-for-cameron-china-hollande

[Zang Fang Zhou , PLA centre for CYBER - WARFARE unit 61398 , Shang Hai , CHINA]

UK is NOTHING without Europe .





UK will be left out of the World POWER PLAY .







UK is the Past , not t he Future .



Cameron can go to fuck a RABBIT .

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/26/blow-for-cameron-china-ho...

[rst9]

"...Hollande said he hoped to build a "multipolar" world.
This is the classic French ambition to ensure the US
cannot dominate the world in a "unipolar" world...."

Hoo-ray for France!!!!

[Simon ba Kochba , the Son of God and a Jewish Messiah ( the same as JesuS Yesu Isa Christ )]

YES


GOOD ,


MULTI - POLARS

[baldeagle]

It is just rhetoric by Hollande...nothing more., He try to butter
up Xi Jinping..indirectly saying China should be treated a
power centre. Xi is a street wise leader...know exactly what
Hollande is up to.


If Hollande meant what he say, then France should
be acting like a sovereign nation in the UN Security
Council...instead of behaving like a puppy dog..obeying
to every command from the USA..

[rst9]

It's too early to tell. Give him a chance to prove what he said.
If France starts selling hi-tech to China, that will be the end of
U.S. dominance.

[CPC , Chinese Imperialist Communist Party of CHINA , the New Imperialist Force in ASEAN]

USA will fall to pieces when CHINESE get
to mass produce FRENCH weapon systems and
French High tech for PLA
and for Chinese second artillery command



French weapon techs are just as GOOD as the US , but
FRENCH has NO MASS PRODUCTION facilities because of MONEY .




Chinese have the MONEY to mass produce French WEAPONs

[Satish]

The world will certainly be a better place if the tide of world
domination by the CCP dictatorship in PRC does not step in to fill the
void.


The CCP Mandarins are dragging PRC down the same slippery path that
was forced upon Japan by the Tojo regime and for the same reason - its
unabashed expansionism.


Beijing regime's lust for raw materials has fueled its colonial
agenda. In this, it is behaving exactly as the Tojo regime had during
the WW II era.

The Pacific nations are all aware that imperialist China has come to
believe like rstx that "Today, it's all about military power, the only
thing counts." In 1979, the CCP dictatorship under Deng Xiaoping's
helmsmanship caused the death of nearly 150,000 human soldiers just to
"teach Vietnam a lesson". It is another matter that a significant
proportion of the dead were Chinese soldiers. But that mattered very
little to lull the blood-lust of the CCP dictatorship in Beijing.


In fact, China's small neighbors thank USA for the fact that China
hasn't dared since 1979 to launch a bloody invasion to teach any of
its small neighbors a lesson. As far as the Pacific nations are
concerned, it is the USA that is providing a shield against the blood
lust of the CCP dictatorship.


As far as the Pacific countries (Japan, Korea, Taiwan, the
Philippines, Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia, New
Zealand etc.) are concerned, it is the CCP dictatorship in Beijing
that is the greatest menace to world peace.



The Munich agreement gave in to Nazi regime's demand for Sudetenland.
But this only whetted the Nazi regime's addiction to aggrandizement.
The Nazi regime went on to lay claims on Austria and then to Poland
and then to Russia and France and then to the whole world.

The Beijing bandit regime's imperialist agenda is expanding
exponentially. Now it is disputing Japan's sovereignty over Okinawa on
the basis of Okinawa's tributary relationship with China some 500
years ago. The CCP dictatorship in Beijing is becoming as much a
menace to world peace as the Tojo regime and the Hitler regime were in
their days:

**************



http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/17-07-2012/121658-china_territorial_claims-0/

China has territorial claims to nearly 20 countries

17.07.2012

Chinese leader Mao Zedong not only built a strong country but also
outlined a global goal: "We must conquer the globe where we will
create a powerful state." Today, China has territorial claims to all
its neighbors. Naturally, the U.S. is dreaming of becoming a mediator
in resolving disputes in the region. But it seems that Beijing
absolutely does not care about their opinion.

Burma, Laos, Northern India, Vietnam, Nepal, Bhutan, Thailand,
Malaysia, Singapore, the Ryukyu Islands, 300 islands of the South
China, East China and Yellow Seas, as well as Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia,
Taiwan, South Kazakhstan, the Afghan province of Bahdashan,
Transbaikalia and the Far East to South Okhotsk - here is the complete
list of areas that, according to Zedong, were lost due to the fall of
the Qing empire. All of these countries and regions combined exceed
the territory of modern China. Not all complaints are voiced by the
Government of China in the international arena, but within the country
the imperialist ambitions have not been lost, but rather, are actively
promoted.

The PRC authorities talk out loud only about the areas that, at least
theoretically, can be taken away from Japan and Korea. Tokyo is
regularly frustrated not only because of the travel of the Russian
leaders to the Kuril Islands, but also about the Chinese ships freely
entering the disputed Senkaku Islands waters. Beijing believes that
the Islands are called Diaoyu, and they belonged to China, but the
malicious Japanese tricked the U.S. into giving them to Japan because
after World War II the uninhabited archipelago was in the US
jurisdiction.

Significant reserves of natural gas were found on the islands. For the
growing industry of China and stagnant Japan it is more than a serious
argument in favor of the struggle for the archipelago, no matter what
it is called. Not to mention the fish that is found there in large
quantities. To date, the only agreement the parties have reached in
the negotiations is on the joint development of oil fields. In
addition, if the Japanese behave more or less decently, the Chinese
are regularly caught for illegal fishing in the area.

Any territorial dispute, but rather, its resolution, is a serious
precedent. If China's claim in respect of at least one territory from
the list of the "lost" is satisfied, the Chinese machine would be
unstoppable. Despite the fact that the Chinese are very pleased to
partner with Russia and have always supported Russia in the UN
Security Council, in person, on the sidelines, its diplomats
supposedly jokingly hint to their Russian colleagues: you must
understand that soon you will have to share the Far East? China has
more than a billion people, while Russia's vast territory barely has
150 million.

These dangerous trends - demographic, and as a result, geopolitical -
must sound scary to the Russian government, but so far it seems that
it is happy with the fact that Beijing makes territorial claims only
to Seoul and Tokyo. In 2005 Russia had already given China a bounty in
the form of 337 square kilometers of land in the area of Big Island
(upper Argun River in the Chita region) and two sites in the vicinity
of the islands Tarabarov and Big Ussuri near the confluence of the
Amur and Ussuri.

However, none of the leaders of the military departments of ASEAN that
includes all debating countries agree to recognize, for example, the
fact that Diaoyu belongs to Japan. Instead, the defense ministers of
Vietnam, Indonesia, Australia, Thailand and Singapore urged the
Japanese authorities to proceed with caution and within the framework
of the international law. These countries certainly do not need a
resolution to the dispute because in that case their territory will be
separated from China only by perseverance of the latter.

They are silent about the "Iodo island" (the Chinese version is
Suenchzhao. - Ed) in the East China Sea. The sneaky Chinese took the
principle of dividing the Arctic as an example and now claim that the
underwater ridge of this tiny piece of land is under close control of
the Chinese. Since the Iodo is closer to Korea, in 2003 the Koreans
built an uninhabitable marine research station there. From the
standpoint of the international law, this rock in general should not
be the subject of a debate.

In any case, the controversy continues, Japan and South Korea remain
to be supported by their all-time ally - the United States. For the
US, the unification of Southeast Asian Nations is a chance to save
their own economy, because in that case the World Trade Center will
move there, where currently there are no transnational corporations in
the amount sufficient for the U.S.

The success of the White House in the region does not depend on the
strength that America loves to show any chance it has, but rather,
diplomacy, as the countries of ASEAN and Asia-Pacific region do not
trust each other or anyone outside the regional boundaries. However,
Washington is trusted here because of the support of Seoul and Tokyo.
However, China has already pushed Japan out of the ranks of the
largest economies in the world, and the structure of the region is no
longer formed on spatial basis.

Therefore, territorial claims of China, and not Russia, India or, for
example, Australia are so important for Washington. Beijing is the
only capital of the world, ready to use force in the struggle for the
sake of expansion. During the last ten years, while America was
blowing up its financial bubble, China has not only developed the
industry, but also equipped its area of interest with military
equipment. China has placed 38 new diesel and nuclear submarines in
the region, purchased four destroyers of class "Modern" from Russia
and built another dozen on its own, and has launched a network of
ground-based ballistic missiles to destroy naval targets.

Only one other country has done this before - the Soviet Union during
the "Cold War". It is no wonder that the Americans are very concerned
with the regular quarrels between China and its major allies.
Construction of a naval base on Hainan Island does not add confidence
to the U.S. The proximity to the Malacca Strait poses a threat to the
smooth supply of Washington's main allies in the region - Japan, South
Korea and Taiwan - this is the way the US sees the situation. The
American senators have already decided that such behavior is a threat
to Beijing's regional peace and stability, economic development and
even "food security". The international community is well aware what
usually follows such wording.

Ilona Raskolnikova

Pravda.Ru

*******************

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/26/inside-china-436801701/?page=all#pagebreak


Threat against ‘little countries’
By Miles Yu
mmil...@gmail.com


China’s official communist newspaper, the Global Times, published a
chilling editorial warning several “little countries” that are
disputing China’s maritime claims in the South China Sea, notably the
Philippines and Vietnam, to “get ready to hear the sound of gunfire.”


Headlined “China Cannot Resort Only to Negotiations Over Maritime
Conflicts, We Must Kill One to Deter One Hundred If Necessary,” the
editorial published Tuesday asked, in a tone of condescension, where
these “little neighboring countries” got the nerve to challenge China.
It called such challenges an “opportunistic strategic offensive
launched by little countries against a big country.”


The newspaper further threatened that the game these countries play
against China would not be easy to win because “China possesses the
force to end such game anytime.”


The report said any fear of a naval war is unnecessary because the
Chinese public had been psychologically getting used to such a naval
conflagration in recent years.


According to the newspaper, the root cause of China’s trouble with
these “little countries” is the United States. “At present various
disputants behave with imperial swagger [against China],” the
commentary said, “as if with the support from the United States, they
all had the force and capabilities to subjugate China.”


The newspaper used the phrase “bodies of waters in East Asia” to
include areas other than the South China Sea where China has
territorial disputes — a clear reference to South Korea and Japan.


Since April 2010, China began deliberately sending regular fishing
fleets accompanied by official government escort ships to disputed
areas of the Spratly’s Island, Senkaku islands, the Korean littoral
area and other murky waters.


These China fishing and escort ships routinely clash with other
nations’ naval patrol ships, including incidents with the Philippine
navy, the South Korean navy and the Japanese coastal patrol vessels
just within the past week, dramatically escalating tensions with
several “little countries.”


Underground Great Wall


The U.S. government this week announced that it had dismantled and
destroyed the last and the largest Cold War-era nuclear weapon, the
B53 gravity bomb, in Amarillo, Texas.


Meanwhile, China is increasing its stockpile of nuclear weapons under
the rubric of a mammoth project called the Underground Great Wall that
includes a 3,000-mile-long subterranean tunnel system used to store
and operate the many thousands of China’s nuclear-carrying missiles.
The system is under the direct supervision of China’s strategic
missile forces known as the Second Artillery Corps.


First reported by the Chinese state television in March 2008 and
confirmed by the Chinese military a year later, the Underground Great
Wall runs several hundred feet below the ground, said James Holmes of
the U.S. Naval War College.


Mr. Holmes wrote in the Japanese-based electronic journal the Diplomat
in August that “the very scale of the underground network opens up new
vistas for Chinese nuclear strategy.”


On Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal quoted former Pentagon nuclear
weapons specialist Philip Karber as fundamentally challenging the
West’s conventional assumption about the size of China’s nuclear
stockpile, officially estimated to include several hundred warheads.


Mr. Karber said gauging the size of China’s nuclear arsenal is
difficult, but the Wall Street Journal article urged an immediate
reconsideration of the underestimated arsenal because “the alternative
is for China, steeped in a 2,500 year military tradition of
concealment, deception and surprise, to announce — at a time and in a
manner of its choosing — its supremacy in a field that we have
foolishly abandoned to our dreams.”

soc.culture.china, soc.culture.indian, soc.culture.malaysia,
soc.culture.filipino, soc.culture.vietnamese
Anti-terrorism law proposed


China announced Monday that it would enact a sweeping law to combat
what the communist state would define as “terrorists” or “terrorist
acts.” These acts include creating public disorder and social panic,
causing public property damage and threatening government agencies.
The law would target international organizations and all others that
abet and finance such “terrorists” and “terrorist acts.”


Human rights activists and thousands of netizens immediately reacted
with anger and protest. Li Tiantian, a Shanghai-based human rights
lawyer, was quoted by overseas Chinese news media as saying: “This law
aims to protect the power structure of the state, to guarantee the
security, stability and power of the government. It is the same as
calling all actions jeopardizing the regime’s rule terrorism,
deserving suppression.”

*************

[rst9]

Satish is a crazy filthy dirty ugly dark-skinned stinky Indian with
twisted warp-minded lunatic lying son-of-a-bitch at it again,
making up lies about others. He has absolutely no idea what the
hell he is talking about. He has no knowledge or understand the
meaning of “sin”.

Go rape and kill more Indian women. That is about all you dumb asshole
can do.

Satish, the filthiest dirtiest god-damnest liar and the most twisted
warp-minded
lunatic son-of-a-bitch in the world.

Satish has slanted eyes, slanted brain, and
slanted twisted lunatic warped mind.

Satish has crooked buck teeth and crooked backs, and bowlegged pig-
headed skunk.
Satish can't even walk straight, let alone see straight.
Ignorant liar & fool like you, Satish, persists being ignorant fool &
liar.

[CPC , Chinese Imperialist Communist Party of CHINA , the New Imperialist Force in ASEAN]

we CHINESE have over 40 million CHINESE in ASEAN who
shall help our CHINA
to take all ASEAN , and all the SOUTH CHINA SEA .

> http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/17-07-2012/121658-china_territori...

> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/26/inside-china-43680170...

>
> Threat against ‘little countries’
> By Miles Yu

> mmile...@gmail.com

>
> China’s official communist newspaper, the Global Times, published a
> chilling editorial warning several “little countries” that are
> disputing China’s maritime claims in the South China Sea, notably the
> Philippines and Vietnam, to “get ready to hear the sound of gunfire.”
>
> Headlined “China Cannot Resort Only to Negotiations Over Maritime
> Conflicts, We Must Kill One to Deter One Hundred If Necessary,” the
> editorial published Tuesday asked, in a tone of condescension, where

> these ...
>
> read more »

[baldeagle]

Too early to tell ! What can change...?

Can France act against NATO command ? No.
Can France act against the USA, in the UN ? No.
Can France stopped talking about human rights
in China and start talking about human right abuses
by the USA ? No.

France will NEVER act like a world power..in
a multi polar world (if this is achievable).
France will always listen to the command of
the USA...like a good obedient servant.

[baldeagle]

On Apr 29, 5:13 am, rst9 <rst9w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Satish is a crazy filthy dirty ugly dark-skinned stinky Indian with
> twisted warp-minded lunatic lying son-of-a-bitch at it again,
> making up lies about others. He has absolutely no idea what the
> hell he is talking about.  He has no knowledge or understand the
> meaning of “sin”.
>
> Go rape and kill more Indian women. That is about all you dumb asshole
> can do.
>
> Satish, the filthiest dirtiest god-damnest liar and the most twisted
> warp-minded
> lunatic son-of-a-bitch in the world.
>
> Satish has slanted eyes, slanted brain, and
> slanted twisted lunatic warped mind.
>

He is like most Indians,..he knows that Indian has become
the latest poodle under the USA. in the hope of getting crumbs
from under Obama's dinner table.
Sad that India has stooped so low now...in the light of the such
honourable leaders as Mahatma Gandhi and the upright Indira
Gandhi...who stood tall against the superpowers in their time.

[Mao , the HEAD of the CPC , Communist Party of China , Yellow Race Power Block]

UK politicians are always playing the Catch - Up game .

UK politicians do not realize the UK is a DEAD POWER ,


UK politicians are always trying to show they are still a
POWER to recant with,

when BIG power Nations are just Sick and Tired of
British Backwardness .

[rst0]

On Apr 29, 5:11 am, baldeagle <force....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's too early to tell.  Give him a chance to prove what he said.
> > If France starts selling hi-tech to China, that will be the end of
> > U.S. dominance.
>
> Too early to tell !  What can change...?
>
> Can France act against NATO command ?  No.
> Can France act against the USA, in the UN ? No.

France has had independent decision and goes its own ways many times
in the past. If there is any nation that would go against the U.S.
and/or NATO, it would be France. If France does it, Germany would
follow.

> Can  France stopped talking about human rights
> in China and start talking about human right abuses
> by the USA ? No.

Big business always trumps politic.

>
> France will NEVER act like a world power..in
> a multi polar world (if this is achievable).

I think France is charting its own course now.

> France will always listen to the command of
>  the USA...like a good obedient servant.

Not always. France has always been a maverick.

[rst0]

Satish, why don't you stop your non-sense.
No one wants to read your junk.

[rst0]

I agree.

India itself is a classic example of their mentality.

[CCCP]

France is still puppy dog of the USA as far as their super power status in
the economy of the G8 league. Hollande is just a politician trying to deepen
his position with his electorates by showing them of his strategy on how he
would play out their USA and work hard with China in order to secure more
jet liner plane orders from them. Historically, for many years, their past
French presidents are not close to China. The French does not have a care
and concern for China. The French did not care, side or offer to help and
support China at all.

So do not expect Hollande to change France's political stands on China.
Hollande is a new French president that is trying hard to secure work for
their French workers as their airbus company is the key ingredient in
reviving the French economy. So during his visit to China to receive the
purchase order of 60 plane orders, he has to demonstrate to the China that
he was keen on multi-polar and not unipolar world. Hollande had to switch
the inherent France policy against China in order to strengthen his
political position by manipulating a change of policy disguised to align
with China's aims and objectives. China will remember France.





"baldeagle" wrote in message
news:a5e5a960-8f54-4e6f...@oy9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

[Zanzibar]

> http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/17-07-2012/121658-china_territori...

> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/26/inside-china-43680170...

>
> Threat against ‘little countries’
> By Miles Yu

> mmile...@gmail.com

>
> China’s official communist newspaper, the Global Times, published a
> chilling editorial warning several “little countries” that are
> disputing China’s maritime claims in the South China Sea, notably the
> Philippines and Vietnam, to “get ready to hear the sound of gunfire.”
>
> Headlined “China Cannot Resort Only to Negotiations Over Maritime
> Conflicts, We Must Kill One to Deter One Hundred If Necessary,” the
> editorial published Tuesday asked, in a tone of condescension, where

> these ...
>
> read more »

Not really. It is not their desire to just that.

[baldeagle]

On Apr 30, 12:19 am, rst0 <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 5:11 am, baldeagle <force....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > It's too early to tell.  Give him a chance to prove what he said.
> > > If France starts selling hi-tech to China, that will be the end of
> > > U.S. dominance.
>
> > Too early to tell !  What can change...?
>
> > Can France act against NATO command ?  No.
> > Can France act against the USA, in the UN ? No.
>
> France has had independent decision and goes its own ways many times
> in the past.  If there is any nation that would go against the U.S.
> and/or NATO, it would be France.  If France does it, Germany would
> follow.

Give one example.... that France had defied the USA
and acted against the USA, since WWII !

>

[rst0]

On Apr 29, 1:29 pm, baldeagle <force....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > France has had independent decision and goes its own ways many times
> > in the past.  If there is any nation that would go against the U.S.
> > and/or NATO, it would be France.  If France does it, Germany would
> > follow.
>
> Give one example.... that France had defied the USA
> and acted against the USA, since WWII !

At the moment, I can't think of one, It will come to me later on.

[CPC , Chinese Imperialist Communist Party of CHINA , the New Imperialist Force in ASEAN]

What can FRANCE do ?



FRENCH can do planety for CHINA ,


yes FRANCE still listen to USA ,

YES , FRENCH can still sell HIGH TECH military
technologies to CHINA ,



FRANCE might still has to listen to USA ,
but
FRANCE can still sell MILITARY HIGH TECH
to CHINA which will make CHINA on par with USA militarily
speaking .


DUMB BALD EAGLE .

[CPC , Chinese Imperialist Communist Party of CHINA , the New Imperialist Force in ASEAN]

FRANCE will never be a WORLD POWER ,
because of FRENCH POPULATION limitation .


but FRANCE can give the CHINESE a FRENCH designed GOOD
PUNCH
when CHINESE will get
FRENCH military technologies which
are on par with USA .

remember CHINESE made helicopters are mostly FRENCH designed


these CHINESE made helicopters can only fly up
to a certain height .


FRANCE can give CHINESE better design FRENCH HELICOPTERS
technologies which
will fly allow CHINESE to fly higher than those
existing Chinese helicopters .

[CPC , Chinese Imperialist Communist Party of CHINA , the New Imperialist Force in ASEAN]

yes

CHARLES de GAULE went against US foreign policy

[baldeagle]

On Apr 30, 12:36 am, "CCCP" <c...@cccp.president.com> wrote:
> France is still puppy dog of the USA as far as their super power status in
> the economy of the G8 league. Hollande is just a politician trying to deepen
> his position with his electorates by showing them of his strategy on how he
> would play out their USA and work hard with China in order to secure more
> jet liner plane orders from them. Historically, for many years, their past
> French presidents are not close to China. The French does not have a care
> and concern for China. The French did not care, side or offer to help and
> support China at all.
>
> So do not expect Hollande to change France's political stands on China.
> Hollande is a new French president that is trying hard to secure work for
> their French workers as their airbus company is the key ingredient in
> reviving the French economy. So during his visit to China to receive the
> purchase order of 60 plane orders, he has to demonstrate to the China that
> he was keen on multi-polar and not unipolar world. Hollande had to switch
> the inherent France policy against China in order to strengthen his
> political position by manipulating a change of policy disguised to align
> with China's aims and objectives.  China will remember France.
>
> "baldeagle"  wrote in message
>

I agree with your observations...about the French position on
China and
Hollande's rhetoric on working towards a multi polar world.

However, like all things, the power landscape is ever changing..
Since the end of the cold war.. the USA become the lone
super power. Has the USA been able to maintain its pre-eminent
position since 1991?

It is obvious that the USA is in decline ever since...losing 2 wars
in the Middle East,.. owing huge debts to China and the oil
countries...its economy almost collapsed in the sub prime
meltdown and has not recovered since... It is unable to do
a thing with Iran and N Korea.
Meanwhile, Russia is regaining some of its past strength,
the Muslim world voice is rising...the BRIC countries are
becoming economic power (world power and economic
power always come like gloves in hand)..while the EU
and the USA are struggling to ward off recession.

The world is slowly but surely moving towards a
multi polar world....without the effort of France or
Hollande.

[Christ Patten , Chairman of BBC TRUST and was the Last British Imperial Governnor of Hong Kong]

MULTI - POLARS ?





there are ONLY tri - POLARS



ENGLISH SPEAKING WORLD ,
CHINESE SPEAKING WORLD ,
and RUSSIAN SPEAKING world .


German are trying to create an Euro Zone ,
which shall be a GERMAN SPEAKING world .

[rst9]

On May 2, 8:41 am, "Christ Patten , Chairman of BBC TRUST
and was the Last British Imperial Governnor of Hong Kong"

<hinduvis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> MULTI - POLARS  ?
>
> there    are  ONLY  tri  - POLARS
>
> ENGLISH  SPEAKING  WORLD ,
>  CHINESE  SPEAKING  WORLD ,
> and  RUSSIAN  SPEAKING  world .

And Spanish/Portuguese speaking world.

[Mussa Hassan , Chief of Police of Malaysia , Ketuanan Malayu .]

Spainish - Portuguese speaking has NO A - bombs .



so Latino - Espagne - Portuguese has NO FIRE POWER .



what kind of a BLOCK if you have no A - bombs Nuclear
POWER .?

[rst9]

On May 2, 9:18 pm, "Mussa Hassan , Chief of Police of Malaysia ,

Ketuanan Malayu ." <mussahassan.has...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Spainish   -  Portuguese  speaking  has  NO     A  - bombs  .
>
> so  Latino -  Espagne -  Portuguese   has  NO  FIRE  POWER .
>
> what  kind  of  a  BLOCK  if  you  have  no    A - bombs  Nuclear
> POWER .?

From Mexico down all the way to the tip of Argentina in South America,
the non-aligned group, they don't care about world politics, or the A-
bomb, or nuclear winter. They will survive while the rest of the
world perished.

[Mussa Hassan , Chief of Police of Malaysia , Ketuanan Malayu .]

THESE Latino are just trying to survive as you say



fuck fuck fuck and fuck for making more babies .


they all speak Spainish - Portuguese



OK

4 MULTI polars



Chinese , English , Russian , Latino .


where will be the Indians like Satish ?


they all speak English ? Hindi , ?

[rst9]

On May 2, 9:34 pm, "Mussa Hassan , Chief of Police of Malaysia ,

Ketuanan Malayu ." <mussahassan.has...@gmail.com> wrote:
> THESE    Latino  are  just  trying    to survive  as  you  say
>
> fuck  fuck  fuck  and  fuck  for   making  more  babies .
>
> they  all  speak  Spainish - Portuguese
>
> OK
>
> 4  MULTI polars
>
> Chinese  , English  ,  Russian ,  Latino  .
>
> where  will be  the  Indians  like  Satish  ?

Pawns and puppy dogs. As long as India can't put their acts together,
Lose their old culture and primitive traditions and get on-track to
the 21th century,
they will continue to be the way they are today, a potential to be
great, but just can't reach the goal line.

There are a lot of educated Indians, those people are working and
living in a country other than India.
Satish is a classic example of Indians refusing to recognize the
changing world environment.

>
> they  all  speak  English  ?  Hindi  ,  ?

English or Hindu is not meaningful.
Indians continue to live as Indians in the 18th - 19th century.

>