The French Revolution - France Overthrown by Jews
truedi...@googlemail.com
Archibald Maule Ramsay
The Nameless War
The French Revolution of 1789 was the most startling event in the
history of Europe since the fall of Rome.
A new phenomenon then appeared before the world. Never before had
a mob apparently organized successful revolution against all other
classes in the state, under high sounding, but quite nonsensical
slogans, and with methods bearing not a trace of the principles
enshrined in those slogans.
Never before had any one section of any nation conquered all
other sections; and still less swept away every feature of the
national life and tradition, from King, religion, nobles, clergy,
constitution, flag, calendar, and place names, to coinage.
Such a phenomenon merits the closest attention; especially in
view of the fact that it has been followed by identical outbreaks in
many countries.
The main discovery that such an examination will reveal is this
fact:
the revolution was not the work of Frenchmen to improve France. It
was the work of aliens, whose object was to destroy everything, which
had been France.
This conclusion is borne out by the references to "foreigners" in
high places in the Revolutionary Councils, not only by Sir Walter
Scott, but by Robes Pierre himself.
We have the names of several of them, and it is clear that they
were not British, or Germans, or Italians, or any other nationals;
they were, of course, Jews.
Let us see what the Jews themselves have to say about it :
"Remember the French Revolution to which it was we who gave the
name of 'Great.' The secrets of its preparation are well known to us
for it was wholly the work of our hands." Protocols of Zion No. 7.
"We were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words
'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.' The stupid Gentile poll parrots flew
down from all sides on to these baits, and with them carried away the
well-being of the world.
The would-be-wise men of the Gentiles were so stupid that they
could not see that in nature there is no equality, and there cannot be
freedom (meaning, of course, freedom as understood by Socialists and
Communists, freedom to wreck your own country)." Protocols of Zion-No.
1.
With this knowledge in our possession we shall find we possess a
master key to the intricate happenings of the French Revolution. The
somewhat confused picture of characters and events moving across the
screen, which our history books have shown us, will suddenly become a
concerted and connected human drama.
When we begin to draw parallels between France of 1789, Britain
of 1640, Russia of 1917, Germany and Hungary of 1918-19, and Spain of
1936, we shall feel that drama grip us with a new and personal sense
of reality.
"Revolution is a blow struck at a paralytic."
Even so, however, it must be obvious that immense organization,
and vast resources, as well as cunning and secrecy far above the
ordinary are necessary for its successful preparation.
It is amazing indeed that people should suppose that "mobs" or
"the people" ever have, or ever could, undertake such a complicated
and costly operation. No mistake more-over could be more dangerous;
for it will result in total inability to recognize the true
significance of events, or the source and focus of a revolutionary
movement.
The process or organizing revolution is seen to be firstly the
infliction of paralysis; and secondly, the striking of the blow or
blows.
It is for the first process, the production of paralysis, that
the secrecy is essential. Its outward signs are debt, loss of
publicity control, and the existence of alien-influenced secret
organizations in the doomed state.
Debt, particularly international debt, is the first and over-
mastering grip. Through it men in high places are suborned, and alien
powers and influences are introduced into the body politic. When the
debt grip has been firmly established, control of every form of
publicity and political activity soon follows, together with a full
grip on industrialists.
The stage for the revolutionary blow is then set. The grip of the
right hand of finance established the paralysis; while it is the
revolutionary left that holds the dagger and deals the fatal blow.
Moral corruption facilitates the whole process.
By 1780 financial paralysis was making its appearance in France.
The world's big financiers were firmly established.
"They possessed so large a share of the world's gold and silver
stocks, that they had most of Europe in their debt, certainly
France."
So writes Mr McNair Wilson in his Life of Napoleon, and continues on
page 38:
"A change of a fundamental kind had taken place in the economic
structure of Europe whereby the old basis had ceased to be wealth and
had become debt. In the old Europe wealth had been measured in lands,
crops, herds and minerals; but a new standard had now been introduced,
namely, a form of money to which the title 'credit' had been given."
The debts of the French Kingdom though substantial were by no
means insurmountable, except in terms of gold: and had the King's
advisers decided to issue money on the security of the lands and real
wealth of France, the position could have been fairly easily righted.
As it was the situation was firmly gripped by one financier after
another, who either could not or would not break with the system
imposed by the international usurers.
Under such weakness, or villainy, the bonds of usury could only
grow heavier and more terrible, for debts were in terms of gold or
silver, neither of which France produced.
And who were the potentates of the new debt machine; these
manipulators of gold and silver, who had succeeded in turning upside
down the finances of Europe, and replacing real wealth by millions
upon millions of usurious loans?
The late Lady Queensborough, in her important work Occult
Theocracy gives us certain outstanding names, taking her facts from
L'Anti-Semitisme by the Jew Bernard Lazare, 1894.
In London she gives the names of Benjamin Goldsmid and his
brother Abraham Goldsmid, Moses Mocatta their partner, and his nephew
Sir Moses Montifiore, as being directly concerned in financing the
French Revolution, along with Daniel Itsig of Berlin and his son-in-
law David Friedlander, and Herz Cerfbeer of Alsace. These names recall
the Protocols of Zion, and turning up Number 20 we read:
"The gold standard has been the ruin of States which adopted it,
for it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so
as we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible."
And Again:-
"Loans hang like a Sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers
who . . . come begging with outstretched palm."
No words could describe more aptly what was overtaking France.
Sir Walter Scott in his Life of Napoleon, Vol. 1, thus describes the
situation:-
"These financiers used the government as bankrupt prodigals are
treated by usurious moneylenders, who feeding their extravagance with
the one hand, with the other wring out of their ruined fortunes the
most unreasonable recompenses for their advances.
By a long succession of these ruinous loans, and the various
rights granted to guarantee them, the whole finances of France were
brought to total confusion."
King Louis' chief finance minister during these last years of
growing confusion was Necker, "a Swiss" of German extraction, son of a
German professor of whom McNair Wilson writes:
"Necker had forced his way into the King's Treasury as a
representative of the debt system owning allegiance to that system."
We can easily imagine what policy that allegiance inspired in
Necker; and when we add to this the fact that his previous record was
that of a daring and unscrupulous speculator, we can understand why
the national finances of France under his baneful aegis rapidly
worsened, so that after four years of his manipulations, the
unfortunate King's government had contracted an additional and far
more serious debt of 170,000,000 pounds.
By 1730 Freemasonry had been introduced into France from England.
By 1771 the movement had attained such proportions that Phillipe Duc
de Chartres afterwards d'Orleans became Grand Master. This type of
freemasonry was largely innocent, both in policy and personnel in its
early days; but as events proved, the real moving spirits were
ruthless and unscrupulous men of blood.
The Duc d'Orleans was not one of these latter. Though a man of
little principle, and an extravagant, vain and ambitious libertine, he
had no motives beyond the ousting of the King, and the establishing of
a democratic monarchy with himself as that monarch. Having in addition
but little intelligence, he made the ideal stalking horse for the
first and most moderate stage of revolution, and a willing tool of men
whom he probably scarcely knew; and who sent him to the guillotine
soon after his base and ignominious role had been played.
The Marquis de Mirabeau who succeeded him as the leading figure
of the Revolution was cast in much the same role. He was a much abler
man than d'Orleans, but so foul a libertine that he was shunned by all
his own class, and imprisoned more than once at the instance of his
own father.
He is known to have been financed by Moses Mendelssohn, head of
the Jewish Illuminati, and to have been more in the company of the
Jewess Mrs. Herz than was her husband. He was not only an early figure-
head in French Freemasonry in the respectable years, but introduced
Illuminism into France.
[Note: Moses Mendelssohn is the 'learned Jew' who is quoted as saying
that: "Judaism is not a religion. It is a law religionized".
To my mind, that is the same as saying that "Judaism is a political
program (for World Dominion) wrapped in a cloak of religion". -
jackie]
This Illuminism was a secret revolutionary society behind
freemasonry. The Illuminati penetrated into all the lodges of Grand
Orient Freemasonry, and were backed and organized by cabalistic Jews.
It is interesting to note that the Duc D'Orleans and Talleyrand
were both initiated into Illuminism by Mirabeau shortly after the
latter had introduced it into France, from Frankfurt, where its
headquarters had been established in 1782 under Adam Weishaupt.
In 1785 there happened a strange event, which makes it seem as
though the heavenly powers themselves made a last moment attempt to
warn France and Europe against these massing powers of evil:
Lightning struck dead a messenger of the Illuminati at Ratisbon.
The police found on the body papers dealing with plans for world
revolution.
Thereupon the Bavarian Government had the headquarters of the
Illuminati searched, and much further evidence was discovered.
French authorities were informed, but the process of paralysis was
too far advanced, and no action resulted.
By 1789 there were more than two thousand Lodges in France
affiliated to the Grand Orient, the direct tool of international
revolution; and their adepts numbered over 100,000.
Thus we get Jewish Illuminism under Moses Mendelssohn and Masonic
Illuminism under Weishaupt established as the inner controls of a
strong secret organization covering the whole of France.
Under the Illuminati worked Grand Orient Freemasonry, and under
that again the Blue, or National, Masonry had operated until it was
converted over-night into Grand Orient Masonry by Phillipe d'Orleans
in 1773. Little did Egalite suspect the satanic powers that he was
invoking, when he took that action, and satanic they certainly were.
The name Lucifer means "Light Bearer"; and Illuminati those who were
lit by that light.
By the time the Estates General met at Versailles on 5th May,
1789, the paralysis of the executive authority by the secret
organizations was complete.
Paralysis by control of public opinion and publicity was well
advanced by then also.
This was the manner of its accomplishment.
By 1780 d'Orleans' entire income of 800,000 livres, thanks to his
reckless gambling and extravagance, was mortgaged to the moneylenders.
In 1781, in return for accommodation, he signed papers handing
over his palace, estates, and house the Palais Royal, to his
creditors, with powers to form there a centre of politics, printing,
pamphleteering, gambling, lectures, brothels, wine-shops, theatres,
art galleries, athletics, and any other uses, which subsequently took
the form of every variety of public debauchery.
In fact, Egalite's financial masters used his name and property
to install a colossal organism for publicity and corruption, which
appealed to every lowest instinct in human nature; and deluged the
enormous crowds so gathered with the filthy, defamatory and
revolutionary output of its printing presses and debating clubs.
As Scudder writes in A Prince of the Blood:
"It gave the police more to do than all the other parts of the
city."
It is interesting to note that the general manager installed by
the creditors at the Palais royal was one de Laclos, a political
adventurer of alien origin, author of Liaisons Dangereuses, and other
pornographic works, who was said "to study the politics of love
because of his love for politics."
This steady stream of corruption and destructive propaganda was
linked with a series of systematic personal attacks of the vilest and
most unscrupulous nature upon any public characters whom the Jacobins
thought likely to stand in their way. This process was known as
"L'infamie."
Marie Antoinette herself was one of the chief targets for this
typically Jewish form of attack. No lie or abuse was too vile to level
at her. More intelligent, alert, and vigorous than the weak and
indolent Louis, Marie Antoinette presented a considerable obstacle to
the revolution. She had, more-over, received many warnings regarding
freemasonry from her sister in Austria; and no doubt was by this time
more awake to its significance than when she had written to her sister
some years previously:
"I believe that as far as France is concerned, you worry too much
about freemasonry. Here it is far from having the significance that it
may have elsewhere in Europe. Here everything is open and one knows
all. Then where could the danger be?
One might well be worried if it were a question of a political
secret society. But on the contrary the government lets it spread, and
it is only that which it seems, an association the objects of which
are union and charity.
One dines, one sings, one talks, which has given the King occasion
to say that people who drink and sing are not suspect of organizing
plots. Nor is it a society of atheists, for we are told God is on the
lips of all. They are very charitable. They bring up the children of
their poor and dead members. They endow their daughters. What harm is
there in all that?"
What harm indeed if these blameless pretensions masked no darker
designs? Doubtless the agents of Weishaupt and Mendelssohn reported on
to them the contents of the Queen's letter; and we can imagine them
shaking with laughter, and rubbing their hands in satisfaction; hands
that were itching to destroy the very life of France and her Queen;
and which at the appropriate hour would give the signal that would
convert secret conspiracy into the "massacres of September" and the
blood baths of the guillotine.
In order to further the campaign of calumny against the Queen, an
elaborate hoax was arranged at the time, when the financiers and grain
speculators were deliberately creating conditions of poverty and
hunger in Paris.
A diamond necklace valued at nearly a quarter of a million was
ordered at the Court jewellers in the Queen's name by an agent of the
Jacobins. The unfortunate Queen knew nothing of this affair until the
necklace was brought round to her for acceptance, when she naturally
disclaimed anything to do with the matter, pointing out that she would
consider it wrong to order such a thing when France was in so bad a
financial way.
The printing presses of the Palais Royal, however, turned full
blast on to the subject; and every kind of criticism leveled at the
Queen.
A further scandal was then engineered for the presses. Some
prostitute from the Palais Royal was engaged to disguise herself as
the Queen; and by the forged letter the Cardinal Prince de Rohan was
induced to meet the supposed Queen about midnight at the Palais Royal,
supposing he was being asked for advice and help by the Queen on the
subject of the necklace.
This event, needless to say, was immediately reported to the
printing presses and pamphleteers, who started a further campaign
containing the foulest innuendoes that could be imagined concerning
the whole affair. The moving spirit behind the scene was Cagliostro,
alias Joseph Balsamo, a Jew from Palermo, a doctor of the cabalistic
art, and a member of the Illuminati, into which he was initiated at
Frankfurt by Weishaupt in 1774.
When the necklace had finally served its purpose, it was sent
over to London, where most of the stones were retained by the Jew
Eliason. Attacks of a similar nature were directed against many other
decent people, who resisted the influence of the Jacobin clubs. After
eight years of this work the process of paralysis by mastery of
publicity was complete.
In every respect therefore by 1789, when the financiers forced
the King to summon the Estates General, the first portion of their
plans for revolution (i.e. paralysis) were accomplished. It now only
remained to strike the blow or series of blows, which were to rob
France of her throne, her church, her constitution, her nobles, her
clergy, her gentry, her bourgeoisie, her traditions, and her culture;
leaving in their place, when the guillotine's work was done, citizen
hewers of wood and drawers of water under an alien financial
dictatorship.
From 1789 onwards a succession of revolutionary acts were set in
motion; each more violent than the one preceding it; each unmasking
fresh demands and more violent and revolutionary leaders. In their
turn each of these leaders, a puppet only of the real powers behind
the revolution, is set aside; and his head rolls into the basket to
join those of his victims of yesterday.
Phillipe Egalite, Duc d'Orleans, was used to prepare the ground
for the revolution; to protect with his name and influence the infancy
of the revolutionary club; to popularize freemasonry and the Palais
Royal; and to sponsor such acts as the march of the women to
Versailles.
The "women" on this occasion were mostly men in disguise.
d'Orleans was under the impression that the King and Queen would be
assassinated by this mob, and himself proclaimed a democratic King.
The real planners of the march, however, had other schemes in view.
One main objective was to secure the removal of the royal family
to Paris, where they would be clear of protection from the army, and
under the power of the Commune or Paris County Council in which the
Jacobins were supreme.
They continued to make use of Egalite right up to the time of the
vote on the King's life, when he crowned his sordid career by leading
the open vote in voting for the death of his cousin. His masters
thereafter had no further use for his services; and he very shortly
followed his cousin to the guillotine amidst the execrations of all
classes.
Mirabeau played a similar role to that of Egalite. He had
intended that the revolution should cease with the setting up of Louis
as a democratic monarch with himself as chief adviser. He had no
desire to see violence done to the King. On the contrary, in the last
days before he died mysteriously by poison, he exerted all his efforts
to get the King removed from Paris, and placed in charge of loyal
generals still commanding his army.
He was the last of the moderates and monarchists to dominate the
Jacobin club of Paris; that bloodthirsty focus of revolution, which
had materialized out of the secret clubs of the Orient Masons and
Illuminati. It was Mirabeau's voice, loud and resonant, that kept in
check the growing rage of the murderous fanatics who swarmed therein.
There is no doubt that he perceived at last the true nature and
strength of the beast, which he had worked so long and so
industriously to unchain. In his last attempt to save the royal family
by getting them out of Paris, he actually succeeded in shouting down
all opposition in the Jacobin club. That evening he died by a sudden
and violent illness; and, as the author of The Diamond Necklace
writes:
"Louis was not ignorant that Mirabeau had been poisoned."
Thus, like Phillipe Egalite, and later Danton and Robes Pierre,
Mirabeau too was removed from the stage when his role had been played.
We are reminded of the passage in Number 15 of the Protocols of Zion:
"We execute masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can
ever have a suspicion of it."
And again:
"In this way we shall proceed with those goy masons who know too
much."
As Mr E. Scudder writes in his Life of Mirabeau:
"He died at a moment when the revolution might still have been
checked."
The figure of Lafayette occupies the stage on several important
occasions during these first revolutionary stages. He was one of those
simple freemasons, who are borne they know not wither, in a ship they
have not fully explored, and by currents concerning which they are
totally ignorant.
While a popular figure with the revolutionary crowds, he very
severely handled several incipient outbreaks of revolutionary
violence, notably in the march of the women to Versailles, during the
attack on the Tuilleries, and at the Champs de Mars. He, too, desired
the establishment of a democratic monarchy, and would countenance no
threat to the King even from Phillipe Egalite, whom he treated with
the utmost hostility during and after the march of the women to
Versailles, believing on that occasion that Egalite intended the
assassination of the King, and the usurpation of the Crown.
He evidently became an obstacle to the powers behind the
revolution, and was packed off to a war against Austria, which the
Assembly forced Louis to declare. Once he did dash back to Paris in an
effort to save the King; but he was packed off again to the war.
Mirabeau's death followed, and Louis' fate was sealed.
The wild figures of Danton, Marat, Robes Pierre, and the fanatics
of the Jacobin club now dominated the scene.
In September of 1792 were perpetrated the terrible "September
massacres"; 8,000 persons being murdered in the prisons of Paris
alone, and many more over the country.
It should be noted here, that these victims were arrested and
held till the time of the massacre in the prisons by one Manuel,
Procurer of the Commune. Sir Walter Scott evidently understood much
concerning the influences which were at work behind the scenes. In his
Life of Napoleon, Vol. 2, he writes on page 30:
"The demand of the Communaute de Paris,* now the Sanhedrin of the
Jacobins, was, of course, for blood."
[*The Paris County Council, equivalent to the L.C.C. in London.]
Again, on page 56 he writes:
"The power of the Jacobins was irresistible in Paris, where Robes
Pierre, Danton and Marat shared the high places in the synagogue."
Writing of the Commune, Sir Walter Scott states in the same work:
"The principal leaders of the Commune seem to have been
foreigners."
Some of the names of these "foreigners" are worthy of note:
There was Chlodero de Laclos, manager of the Palais Royal,
said to be of Spanish origin.
There was Manuel, the Procurer of the Commune, already
mentioned. He it was who started the attack upon royalty in the
Convention, which culminated with the execution of Louis and Marie
Antoinette.
There was David the painter, a leading member of the
Committee of Public Security, which "tried" the victims. His voice was
always raised calling for death. Sir Walter Scott writes that this
fiend used to preface his "bloody work of the day with the
professional phrase, 'let us grind enough of the Red'." David it was
who inaugurated the Cult of the Supreme being; and organized
"the conducting of this heathen mummery, which was substituted
for every external sign of rational devotion." (Sir Walter Scott, Life
of Napoleon, Vol. 2.)
There were Reubel and Gohir, two of the five "Directors," who
with a Council of Elders became the government after the fall of Robes
Pierre, being known as the Directoire.
The terms "Directors" and "Elders" are, of course,
characteristically Jewish.
One other observation should be made here; it is that this
important work by Sir Walter Scott in 9 volumes, revealing so much of
the real truth, is practically unknown, is never reprinted with his
other works, and is almost unobtainable.
Those familiar with Jewish technique will appreciate the full
significance of this fact; and the added importance it lends to Sir
Walter Scott's evidence regarding the powers behind the French
Revolution.
To return to the scene in Paris. Robes Pierre now remains alone,
and apparently master of the scenes; but this again was only
appearance. Let us turn to the Life of Robes Pierre, by one G. Renier,
who writes as though Jewish secrets were at his disposal. He writes:
"From April to July 1794 (the fall of Robes Pierre) the terror was
at its height. It was never the dictatorship of a single man, least of
all Robes Pierre. Some 20 men (the Committees of Public Safety and of
General Security) shared the power."
To quote Mr. Renier again:
"On the 28th July, 1794," "Robes Pierre made a long speech before
the Convention . . . a philippic against ultra-terrorists. . .
uttering vague general accusations.
'I dare not name them at this moment and in this place. I
cannot bring myself entirely to tear asunder the veil that covers this
profound mystery of iniquity. But I can affirm most positively that
among the authors of this plot are the agents of that system of
corruption and extravagance, the most powerful of all the means
invented by foreigners for the undoing of the Republic; I mean the
impure apostles of atheism, and the immorality that is at its base'."
Mr Renier continues with all a Jew's satisfaction:
"Had he not spoken these words he might still have triumphed!"
In this smug sentence Mr Renier unwittingly dots the i's and
crosses the t's, which Robes Pierre had left uncompleted. Robes
Pierre's allusion to the "corrupting and secret foreigners" was
getting altogether too near the mark; a little more and the full truth
would be out.
At 2 a.m. that night Robes Pierre was shot in the jaw and early
on the following day dragged to the guillotine.
Again let us recall Protocol 15:
"In this way we shall proceed with goy masons who know too much."
Note: In a somewhat similar manner Abraham Lincoln was shot and killed
by the Jew Booth on the evening of his pronouncement to his cabinet
that he intended in future to finance U.S. loans on a debt free basis
similar to the debt free money known as "Greenbacks," with which he
had financed the Civil War.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archibald Maule Ramsay wrote the true history of events leading up to
the Second World War. For this he was imprisoned for several years.
Read his short 120 page book The Nameless War:
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.Wa...
CONTENTS
1. The British Revolution
2. The French Revolution
3. The Russian Revolution
4. Development of Revolutionary Technique
5. Germany Bells The Cat
6. 1933: Jewry Declares War
7. "Phoney War" Ended by Civilian Bombing
8. Dunkirk and After
9. The Shape of Things to Come
10. President Roosevelt's Role
11. Regulation 18b
12. Who Dares?
13. Epilogue
14. Capt. Ramsay's Statement From Prison to Parliament
15. Particulars - Reasons Given For Arrest
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War/00.Introduction.htm
Robert Cohen
zonker
protocols of zion. please the are known to be a forgery.
Peace Out
Zonker