Nice art!
http://www.cldc.howard.edu/~vgm/
What are you talking about now?
>
>Too bad the web page could not have included some "real portraits" of Queen
>Tiye rather than an *artist's conception*.
Yes I agree. Have you ever seen the carved bust of Tiye? She has skin
darker than mine and looks like a friend of mine who is a professor of
African studies.
>
>That truly would have been quite beautiful...and historically correct.
>
But you'd rather someone like Elizebeth Taylor portray the beautiful
African Queen. Sorry, not here.
Have you ever seen the relief carvings of both Tiye and Akenaton? They
typical negroid features. Did you that Tiye was of Nubian origin?
Obviously not.
>Katherine Griffis (Greenberg)
>Member of the American Reseach Center in Egypt
>
THE MIGHTY KUSH
Quite accurate.
Yes I agree. Have you ever seen the carved bust of Tiye? She has skin
darker than mine and looks like a friend of mine who is a professor of
African studies."
Yep: seen that one and the ones in alabaster and in yellow jasper: am I to
presume, then, that Tiye was also yellow and white, like a calico cat?
C'mon, give me a break.
What I am saying here, and you're getting pretty hysterical about this, is
that an "artist's rendition", and especially one done for the "Black
Leaders of Africa" campaign for a major beer distributor is *not*, and I
mean, "*never* a substitute for the historically correct, original artwork,
and you imply in your postings and KMT's postings that this is the *real
thing*. It isn't, and I am just pointing that out.
some "real portraits" of Queen >Tiye rather than an *artist's conception*.
"That truly would have been quite beautiful...and historically correct.
>
But you'd rather someone like Elizebeth Taylor portray the beautiful
African Queen."
Insofar as **Cleopatra** is verified and detailed by the ancients as a
Macedonian Greek, maybe (I find Taylor has very few Greek features, for
example, to play Cleopatra accurately, especially that "hooked nose" that
her portraits in temple carvings show). I, of course, don't believe that
Ms. Taylor would make a good Queen Tiye at all: calm down.
and you said:
"ever seen the relief carvings of both Tiye and Akenaton? They typical
negroid features. Did you that Tiye was of Nubian origin?"
I see we're at that *old saw* again: you have your fantasy here, MK: and
you are welcome to it. BUT the **fact** is, Tiye was a commoner whose
father was general of the Army and not of royal birth. Her father and
mother, Yuya and Thuya, were of non-Egyptian origin,and that was stated by
the ancients themselves, and was evidenced by their mummies when found in
late 19th-early 20th century. Various areas have been suggested as their
origin point, although there is some strong evidence for Mitanni (possibly
Persia?) ties of the Thuya/Yuya/Tiye family, for both political and
religious issues connected with them.
These mummies showed 2 elderly people of 60+ years, with long straight hair
that appeared to be either blonded or hennaed white hair, with hooked noses
of possible Near Eastern origin, and not the origin you claim here.
These pictures of the mummies can be found in *any* good book in Egyptian
history: please: look it up for yourself, as these mummies have been
**verified** as the parents of Tiye. (Try "X-Raying the Pharoahs", by
Harris and Weeks, for both external and internal views of the mummies). I
imagine that Tiye was somewhat similar to her parents, and of course, her
children would have reflected the result of the union with Amenhotep III.
You say you *see* Egyptians of Nubian origin: OK, I agree. That's what you
see...but I see Egyptians of various racial groups reflected in these
paintings and sculptures: that is how the Egyptians saw them, too, and
reflected their paintings to show what differences and similarities there
were, usually in comparison to themselves. Sometimes, even religious or
political issues caused these features to become different, as any book on
the Egyptian art canons will tell you. For example:
Akhenaten's rendering of himself until Year 5 was a very plain,
Thutmosid-style of individual with a hooked nose and all (yes, we have
Thutmosis III's mummy too: see above referenced book, please). After Year
5, we see the long-horse-faced king with hydocephalus...now, which is the
*correct* rendering? Until we find Akhenaten's mummy, we won't know, will
we? So, let's stop making presumptions that *one* painting is *proof* of
something, OK?
Your "artist's conception painting" that you tout here shows only *one*
aspect of the various ways that Tiye was presented: I have seen black, red,
yellow, and white representations of her, and usually these colors reflect
either a) the type of material (stone) used, and/or b) some religious/cult
significance from the burgeoning Aten cult, which was started by the Royal
Family and brought to fruition under Akhenaten.
Again, one picture, or an *especially modern* painting, does not **proof**
make, MK. You should know that, as an anthropologist. Now, please stop
making something out of a general comment I made about a web site.
I'm just pointing out that, while a nice picture, a full rendering of Tiye
in *all her various* styles would have been more appropriate and
"historically accurate", and this painting is not such evidence.
Katherine Griffis (Greenberg)
Member of the American Research Center in Egypt
--
Could be but Tiye had sterber lips and her skin colour is not known.
The Hab
What research are you speaking of? That picture of Tiye has nothing to do
with research, or proving anything. I posted it simply to elicit a
predictable response from people like Katherine Griffy who went absolutely
histerical over it. Its called entertainment, not research.
THE MIGHTY KUSHITE
AAAHHHH THIS BUD'S FOR YOU!!
I wouldnt break my arm patting myself on the back about Akhenaten, GY...
Akhenaten...isnt that the guy who really messed up Egypt's economy, made
his half brother his 'queen' after he banished Nefertiti, AND married his
own daughter (then about age 11 or 12) and sired a child by her...which
of course resulted in her death.... I also heard he sired a child with
his MOTHER Tiye, which was as taboo then as it is now!
These are things that I heard about from different sources, the
reliability of which I can not ascertain. (Would love any assistance on
this!)
Here are some of the more 'Winning" theories (take your pick!):
My *personal favorite* ludicrous theory....
Akhenaten was a space alien sent here by Jehovah so that he could
'enlighten the world' He is also *supposedly* the author of Sacred
Geometry which he got from the Overlords of Time. It later went to
Pythagoras. Drunvalo Malchesidec is really big on this theory that he
said he got DIRECTLY from the Neter, Tehuti (Thoth) himself. Then Thoth
decided to ascend in 1982 and entrusted all of this and other
*vital*information to Drunvallo.... how could we as scientists and
scholars have MISSED THIS?!?! <g>
2)Akhenaten was diseased and syphillitic, also, supposedly the father of
Per 'aa Tutankhamun...Thus his head shape was so odd...I have heard
diseases of one kind or another (maybe thats were the Alien drivel comes
from!)
Akhenaten was not the *wonderous Per'aa* that filmmakers etc. like to
make him out to be. He broke LOTS of rules and was in the face of every
law of Ma'at that was set down from the beinging. IN rebelling against
the corrupt priesthood, he himself was also corrupted...Why else would
they have razed Tel El Amarna to the ground hoping to leave no traces of
him whatsoever?
Anyone care to shed any light on the subject or share any more theories..
In Ma'at
Xina
Hey dip-stick,
Monotheism is belief in one god and no others...Akhenaton was NOT
monotheistic!
Moron.
The Hab
----
"Weigh the situation, then move..."
-Sun Tzu's `The Art of War'; VII, 15
Sorry...
> Syphilitic, I have never heard: not that it didn't occur, though.
> "Diseased" has been discussed about Akhenaten thoughout history due to his
> weird looks in the Amarna period, but there have been some fascincating
> arguments that he suffered from Froelich's syndrome, which causes
> hydrocephaly, spindle shanks and arms, and usually, pure sterility. This
> would, of course, beg the question about the 6 daughters, but what if the
> disease was somehow *incomplete*?? Sure would explains a lot with the
> looks and all...
I heard a VERY convincing lecture that Amenhotep IV (Akhenaten) may have
suffered from a genetic condition known as Marfan's Syndrome (which apparently
Abe Lincoln did as well), typfied by long "spidery" limbs, some blindness do to
loose lenses, chest and skull deformations, &c. Also, these people are fertile
(a major problem with the Froelich's syndrome theory). There is a FAQ sheet at:
Troy
Or how about a movie of the recapturing of northern Egypt from the
Palestinian Hyksos invaders in 1523 BCE? Immediately after this, Egypt
started it's greatest empire, reaching far into Palestine.
BTW, this period of Egyptian strenght was supposedly the time the
Israelites left Egypt. Yet this is when Egypt still controlled the area
the Israelites were supposedly fleeing into.
>one day i will make a film of the life of queen
> >tiye and Akhanaten and honor the legacy of these great african's.
>--
Ralph MacFadden
ilo...@maui.net
http://maui.net/~iloveu
> Katherine Griffis wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Syphilitic, I have never heard: not that it didn't occur, though.
> > "Diseased" has been discussed about Akhenaten thoughout history due to his
> > weird looks in the Amarna period, but there have been some fascincating
> > arguments that he suffered from Froelich's syndrome, which causes
> > hydrocephaly, spindle shanks and arms, and usually, pure sterility. This
> > would, of course, beg the question about the 6 daughters, but what if the
> > disease was somehow *incomplete*?? Sure would explains a lot with the
> > looks and all...
>
> I heard a VERY convincing lecture that Amenhotep IV (Akhenaten) may have
> suffered from a genetic condition known as Marfan's Syndrome (which
apparently
> Abe Lincoln did as well), typfied by long "spidery" limbs, some
blindness do to
> loose lenses, chest and skull deformations, &c. Also, these people are
fertile
> (a major problem with the Froelich's syndrome theory).
Just a thought: one thing about Egyptian art is that you can't take
anything at its face value, as I'm always telling students. We should all
consider the possibility that the appearance of Akhenaten is (for some
reason) the way he wanted to be *shown*, rather than necessarily the way
he was. The more fascinating question is "why".
Nigel Strudwick
You are apologising for one incorrect statement?
How quaint.
You're not from these parts, are you stranger?
¤__)
¤ )
--
Mike Tittensor (mi...@heridoth.demon.co.uk)
>> Sorry...
>>
>You are apologising for one incorrect statement?
Hey..Im a perfectionist!! *grin*
>
>How quaint.
Well, at least you didnt say 'cute'...Mme. Xina does not do cute!
>You're not from these parts, are you stranger?
>
>¤__)
>¤ )
Umm...no not from the UK but certainly work with lots of folks from there.
(British Telecom). BTW I love your posts...they are always entertaining if
not informative!
Christina VanSpoor
<snip in Katherine Griffis and Troy Sagrillo...sorry guys>
>Just a thought: one thing about Egyptian art is that you can't take
>anything at its face value, as I'm always telling students. We should all
>consider the possibility that the appearance of Akhenaten is (for some
>reason) the way he wanted to be *shown*, rather than necessarily the way
>he was. The more fascinating question is "why".
>
>Nigel Strudwick
I'd say that as long as Echnaton's mummy's not found, one can *give* him any disease at all
on the bases of his representation in artifacts...for all I care, with his long head
and his pulled out limbs, he could be impersonating a sunbeam, petrified symbol of his
object of adoration, hehehe.
Nevertheless, as much as his physical features may look "realistic", they're still very stylised,
and followed by the high notables of his time...does this mean they *all* had the same disease???
Marleen