God,and His prophecy
Frankie Lee
I understand perfectly why God do not take the Prideful and the Nay-
Sayers into confidant. Just at the dawn into 20 th century, the gifts
of the supernatural were endowed.The close-minded ones were excluded.
Azusa Street were filled with Christians speaking in tongues, to the
extent that amputees had their lost limbs miraculously restored.
Hundreds over years had gone by, and such Divine interventions,
blatantly spread across all over the world. Objections by our worldly
wise men, and within the Christendom, offering many explanations on
the natural realm (studying matter only result in matter),plus insults
and ridicules, and weird criticisms: however it could still not
withstand the deluge of truths,prophecies,miracles,signs and wonders.
The Charismatic/Pentecostal denomination within the Christendom
movement remains unabated till this day.
No matter how demonically infested intellectuals tried to corrupt and
pervert the ways of God, as the Scriptures pronounce: It is hard for
you to kick against the Rocks.
Mother Theresa last days were stories seldom trumpeted into our
skeptical world. It is amazing that non-saints of Vatican try to study
into her life deeply and demanded that she must passed the most
stringent test known to man before declaring her a saint, and she must
wait for many years. Can the students teach the teachers?
It must be to satisfy only the Intellectuals of our world, not the
entire world. She saw the Lord Jesus coming personally to receive her
soul, unfortunately not Mary, as most hope it should be her. This
publicity, of her spiritual encounter, was minimal so no criticism was
leveled against her. Her well renowned status-- of love and benevolent
acts for the Calcutta folks--who would want to be seen as a nasty
crook to dispute her spiritual visitation during her last days?
The Christian community was trying to save Michael Jackson's soul, as
a prophecy about his early demise was made earlier, many months
before. The frantic desire to get help for him ended to no avail. The
Doctors already had given him a clean bill of health, and he was
young, 50s.He is about to go for world- tour, and who would give
credence to the "superstitious prophecies" by the God of the Bible to
a Pastor?
This earth shattering prophecy of God met with obstacles by human
interpretation, and follies.There was such a disconnect which cause
our hearts filled with frustrations.
The prophecies which were written in the Bible, some were decreed and
static, which now scholars and theologians are still seeking to
unravel.
The ability of God to foresee future events and made known to us, is
to help us to avoid disasters and calamities. But as for the Decreed
prophecy, no one can or will be able to change it.
The prophecy for Micheal is changeable,meaning he could be saved.
Jonah's prophecies against Nineveh impending doom didn’t happen. Jonah
changes it by preaching to the entire nations. The King and the people
heeded the instruction, and repent of their sins. See, such a prophecy
is not true because it didn't happen, and it seems Jonah became angry
at God for not "fulfilling his prophecy”, so our world enjoy seeing
such failed prophecy: so as to find fault on God’s accuracies.
Suddenly it was claimed by ignorant:” those prophecies aren't true".
Prophecies after prophecies were roundly discounted by smart Alecs,
giving well balance analysis, as though they are sitting on the throne
of God. Would you not then discount it in the many months leading to
Michael Jackson’s death?
After it happened as predicted, would not fools still scrambled for
evil reasons to discredit God’s ability to foresee future? The
Christians marvel at God’s mercies and how opportunities were given to
him, trying to alter its course, the doubters saw the amazing,
awesomeness of God’s divine miracles: which left them speechless.
The true seekers for God proclaimed that the Christian God must be
real and true, but for the obnoxious nuts-what would they say?
Prophecies of God are never meant to be analyzing, as to whether it is
true, or decided by others objection. It has to be accepted, and no
debates about it. Any human, cleverly designs' rationale must be
rejected. Many puff-up Christians are warned: never to blaspheme the
prophecies of God, or else, face the consequence of divine judgment.
Some question why 9/11 events God could not find confidant to divulge?
The answer is obvious. Pat Robertson was criticized, so do the late
Jerry Falwell .The promiscuity and godless-American activities which
they had said were the reasons for that loophole. The Liberals does
not want God to show up, and liberals wonder why God didn't show up?
Even a well known intellectual journalist warned of the assassination
of a Israel Prime minister Yitzhak Rabin then, lose credence among
many, as he study Bible-codes, basing on that physical evidence alone.
See how tortured and debates over Bible-codes. That Minister was
assassinated as predicted, because no concrete actions were in place
to halt it.
Is God still saying on the many things and events that are going to
come? You bet. The problems are those who have ears, must listen to
what God is continuously saying. Since when did God become silent in
our world's stage? God so loved the world. Find me one honourable man
to stand in-between the gap, in these last days?
What is more serious is what God is saying now to our individual
level. Are we acknowledging our sins, our godlessness, and our
confusion as to our after-life, and do we see the need to change our
perspective?
God is not mock, whatever you sow, you reap.
God’s mercies for you are limited; when it is over here, that’s it.
wusong
也不靠神仙皇帝。
要創造人類的幸福，
全靠我們自己！
我們要奪回勞動果實，
讓思想衝破牢籠。
快把那爐火燒得通紅，
趁熱打鐵才能成功！
|: 這是最後的鬥爭，
團結起來到明天，
英特納雄耐爾
就一定要實現。 :|
誰是世界上的創造者？
只有我們勞苦的工農。
一切只歸生產者所有，
哪裡容得寄生虫！
我們的熱血流了多少，
只把那殘酷惡獸。
倘若是一旦殺滅盡了，
一輪紅日照遍五大洲！
report2009
embarrass to show, right? Haha!
Hey psycho Xangdi, you can not read Chinese, you must have got this
quote from someone’s post or from the following, right? Haha! Do you
want me to show it in "your Taiyu"? You don't know what I men here
because you don't know Chinese language, right? Haha!
1.起來，餓寒交迫的奴隸！
起來，全世界受苦的人！
滿腔的熱血已經沸騰，
要為真理而鬥爭！
舊世界打個落花流水，
奴隸們起來起來！
不要說我們一無所有，
我們要做天下的主人！
（副歌）
這是最後的鬥爭，
團結起來到明天，
英特納雄耐爾就一定要實現！
這是最後的鬥爭，
團結起來到明天，
英特納雄耐爾就一定要實現！
2.從來就沒有什麼救世主，
也不靠神仙皇帝！
要創造人類的幸福，
全靠我們自己！
我們要奪回勞動果實，
讓思想衝破牢籠！
快把那爐火燒得通紅，
趁熱打鐵才會成功！
（重複副歌）
3.是誰創造了人類世界？
是我們勞動羣眾！
一切歸勞動者所有，
哪能容得寄生蟲？！
最可恨那些毒蛇猛獸，
吃盡了我們的血肉！
一旦將它們消滅乾淨，
鮮紅的太陽照遍全球！
（重複副歌）
> > God's mercies for you are limited; when it is over here, that's it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Anti-DabianchenVirus
even got a clue about the significance of those phrases. You are
uneducated - you can only cut-and-paste from Google!
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
report2009
shit), why?
This once again proves you don’t know Chinese language. You can not
even understand what I posted here, you don’t know what “your Taiyu”
mean either. Hey, didn’t you lie that you live in Taipei?
On Oct 31, 7:14 am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wus...@rocketmail.com>
wrote:
Lars Eighner
<081244a0-ea25-4603...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, the
lovely and talented Frankie Lee broadcast on alt.atheism:
> God is not mock,
mock mock mock mock
> whatever you sow, you reap.
You christers better hope not. If you had to endure for even a short time
the wickedness and oppression you have been dealing out all your lives you'd
be begging for oxycontin or a bullet in the head.
--
Lars Eighner *Atheist #1965* use...@larseighner.com <http://larseighner.com/>
283 days since Rick Warren prayed over Bush's third term.
Obama: No hope, no change, more of the same. Yes, he can, but no, he won't.
Anti-DabianchenVirus
even got a clue about the significance of those phrases. You are
On Oct 31, 4:34 am, report2009 <repost2...@yahoo.com> wrote:ther
report2009
quote and my quote because you don't know Chinese language, right? And
you lied that you live in Taipei, how come you don't understand "your
Taiyu" mean??? And how come you don't understand the following:
喂 Xangdi 屁精! 甘霖老木賽羚羊! 聽不懂吧?! 好爽! 哈哈!
Psycho Xangdi, you live in Taipei and graduated from a university in
Taipei? What a LIAR?
On Oct 31, 7:47 am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wus...@rocketmail.com>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
Anti-DabianchenVirus
you haven't even got a clue about the significance of those phrases.
You are uneducated - you can only cut-and-paste from Google!
report2009
your quote and my quote because you don't know Chinese language,
right? And you lied that you live in Taipei, how come you don't
understand "your Taiyu" mean??? And how come you don't understand the
喂 Xangdi 屁精! 甘霖老木賽羚羊! 聽不懂吧?! 好爽! 哈哈!
Psycho Xangdi, you live in Taipei and graduated from a university in
Taipei? What a LIAR!!!
Hey, psycho Xangdi, where is your infamous ID "Xangdi", did someone
kill that one too? Haha!
Hey psycho Xangdi, just because abianchen exposed your racist act when
you pretended as a black guy using ID "Leroy B Jones" to harass black
people in November 2007 so you wanted revenge against abianchen for
the rest of your life? Get over it! Anyway, don't you think that's
hilarious when you got exposed, one netter said you got caught pants
down! Because of that, you abandoned your infamous ID "Chairman Mao
Says". That's also hilarious. Hehe!
Abianchen, a Filipino whore Meichi? No kidding! Hey, anyone believes
you and Rusty Old Fool's lies? Haha!
Oops, psycho Xangdi is going to repost his stolen Filipino girl's
photo to "prove" (frame actually) abianchen is "Filipino whore Meichi"
for revenge. Abianchen has become the most important person in his
life. Psycho Xangdi even calls himself “Virus for Dabian”. Can you
believe it?!
Psycho Xangdi, 你不會中文, 对中國又一無所知, 所以只能騷擾網友, 真是個可憐蟲!
On Oct 31, 8:00 am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wus...@rocketmail.com>
wrote:
report2009
your quote and my quote because you don't know Chinese language. And
you lied that you live in Taipei, how come you don't understand "your
Chinese sentence:
喂 Xangdi 屁精! 甘霖老木賽羚羊! 聽不懂吧?! 好爽! 哈哈!
Psycho Xangdi, you said you live in Taipei and graduated from a
university in Taipei? What a LIAR!!!
Hey psycho Xangdi, got more recent Meichi's photos? Can't you and
Rusty Old Fool steal more as you two did it a year ago? Haha!
Oops, psycho Xangdi is going to repost his stolen Filipino girl's
photo to "prove" (frame actually) abianchen is "Filipino whore Meichi"
for revenge. Abianchen has become the most important person in his
life. Psycho Xangdi even calls himself “Virus for Dabian”. Can you
believe it?!
On Oct 31, 9:17 am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wuso...@rocketmail.com>
wrote:
> You haven't presented one single shred of evidence to support all
> those allegations you have been spewing over the internet all these
> years, which proves beyond any reasonable shadow of doubt that you are
> a liar and a mental retard!
>
> This is proof of your being an ugly lying Philippino whore:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/995a71070728ba0c...
Anti-DabianchenVirus
lesbian puta abianchen/Meichi, is a liar and a retard.
report2009
your quote and my quote because you don't know Chinese language. And
you lied that you live in Taipei, how come you don't understand "your
Taiyu" means??? And how come you don't understand the following
Chinese sentence:
喂 Xangdi 屁精! 甘霖老木賽羚羊! 聽不懂吧?! 好爽! 哈哈!
Psycho Xangdi, you said you live in Taipei and graduated from a
university in Taipei? What a LIAR!!!
Hey psycho Xangdi, got more recent Meichi's photos? Can't you and
Rusty Old Fool steal more as you two did it a year ago? Haha!
Oops, psycho Xangdi is going to repost his stolen Filipino girl's
photo to "prove" (frame actually) abianchen is "Filipino whore Meichi"
for revenge. Abianchen has become the most important person in his
life. Psycho Xangdi even calls himself “Virus for Dabian”. Can you
believe it?!
On Oct 31, 9:46 am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wuso...@rocketmail.com>
wrote:
report2009
your quote and my quote because you don't know Chinese language. And
you lied that you live in Taipei, how come you don't understand "your
Taiyu" means??? And how come you don't understand the following
Chinese sentence:
喂 Xangdi 屁精! 甘霖老木賽羚羊! 聽不懂吧?! 好爽! 哈哈!
Psycho Xangdi, you said you live in Taipei and graduated from a
university in Taipei? What a LIAR!!!
Hey psycho Xangdi, got more recent Meichi's photos? Can't you and
Rusty Old Fool steal more as you two did it a year ago? Haha!
Oops, psycho Xangdi is going to repost his stolen Filipino girl's
photo to "prove" (frame actually) abianchen is "Filipino whore Meichi"
for revenge. Abianchen has become the most important person in his
life. Psycho Xangdi even calls himself "Virus for Dabian". Can you
believe it?!
On Oct 31, 10:03 am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wuso...@rocketmail.com>
wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/4fc7659faab54384...
report2009
your quote and my quote because you don't know Chinese language. And
you lied that you live in Taipei, how come you don't understand "your
Taiyu" means??? And how come you don't understand the following
Chinese sentence:
喂 Xangdi 屁精! 甘霖老木賽羚羊! 聽不懂吧?! 好爽! 哈哈!
Psycho Xangdi, you said you live in Taipei and graduated from a
university in Taipei? What a LIAR!!!
Hey psycho Xangdi, got more recent Meichi's photos? Can't you and
Rusty Old Fool steal more as you two did it a year ago? Haha!
Oops, psycho Xangdi is going to repost his stolen Filipino girl's
photo to "prove" (frame actually) abianchen is "Filipino whore Meichi"
for revenge. Abianchen has become the most important person in his
life. Psycho Xangdi even calls himself "Virus for Dabian". Can you
believe it?!
On Oct 31, 10:08 am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wuso...@rocketmail.com>
wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/4fc7659faab54384...
Jimbo
> God: They, professing themselves to be wise, they become fools.
>
And you have no sense of irony in that statement, right?
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
>
> God is not mock, whatever you sow, you reap.
>
Yes, gods are not mocked. You can't mock something that is not there.
You can't mock what doesn't exist.
Believers in the make believe however, that is a different story. We
mock them all the time. We laugh in their faces, call them deluded
sods, giggle at their feeble attempts for FORCE the rest of the world
into their little mold.
You are just another in a long line of dickless idiots, screaming at the
world because nobody believes like you do.
>
> God�s mercies for you are limited; when it is over here, that�s it.
>
When you can actually prove there is a god, any god, then you'll have
something to threaten people with. Till that time however, you threats
are meaningless, empty, laughable. Just as laughable as the person who
is making them.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor http://www.jesusneverexisted.com
http://azhotops.blogspot.com
A.A #1143 http://scienceblogs.com/aardvarchaeology
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
Free Lunch
<leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>God: They, professing themselves to be wise, they become fools.
...
>God is not mock, whatever you sow, you reap.
You mock God with each of your posts.
>God�s mercies for you are limited; when it is over here, that�s it.
Luckily for you, the God you claim to worship, but mock instead, does
not exist.
Christopher A. Lee
<ktay...@getnet.net> wrote:
>Frankie Lee wrote:
>>
>> God is not mock, whatever you sow, you reap.
>>
>Finally, you got something right.
Like most believers he doesn't seem to understand that he himself
reaps what he sows.
>Yes, gods are not mocked. You can't mock something that is not there.
>You can't mock what doesn't exist.
He's a narcissist incapable of grasping that the rest of the world
doesn't see it through his eyes.
There is something about religious belief that does this.
>Believers in the make believe however, that is a different story. We
>mock them all the time. We laugh in their faces, call them deluded
>sods, giggle at their feeble attempts for FORCE the rest of the world
>into their little mold.
Idiots aren't idiots in their own eyes so they always rational reasons
they get treated that way, with them as the good guys and us as the
unreasonable bad guys.
>You are just another in a long line of dickless idiots, screaming at the
>world because nobody believes like you do.
Too bad he is incapable of grasping this.
>> God�s mercies for you are limited; when it is over here, that�s it.
It takes a fucking moron to say that sort of thing to people he knows
don't believe what he does.
>When you can actually prove there is a god, any god, then you'll have
>something to threaten people with. Till that time however, you threats
>are meaningless, empty, laughable. Just as laughable as the person who
>is making them.
Which isn't his self-image.
Sla#s
"Frankie Lee" <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:081244a0-ea25-4603...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
God: They, professing themselves to be wise, they become fools.
God, are you phquing right there!
Slatts
Syd M.
>
>
You better hope not, wanna-be fascist.
PDW
Frankie Lee
> In our last episode,
> <081244a0-ea25-4603-a310-f25ec43a3...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, the
A bullet in the head will solve problems?If that is true,all sick
folks should be begging fro death to get out of it.All who suffer here
should beg for it.
The evidence,of the presence of cancers in our world is to show us of
a more horrifying type of cancers to hurt you,in that coming world.
Human pains here is to tell you what greater pains you will feel,when
your turn shall come.
Frankie Lee
***If you had sense that you are a fool,you wouldn't act smart here.
Frankie Lee
wrote:
> Frankie Lee wrote:
>
> > God is not mock, whatever you sow, you reap.
>
> Finally, you got something right.
>
> Yes, gods are not mocked. You can't mock something that is not there.
> You can't mock what doesn't exist.
>
> Believers in the make believe however, that is a different story. We
> mock them all the time. We laugh in their faces, call them deluded
> sods, giggle at their feeble attempts for FORCE the rest of the world
> into their little mold.
>
> You are just another in a long line of dickless idiots, screaming at the
> world because nobody believes like you do.
>
>
> When you can actually prove there is a god, any god, then you'll have
> something to threaten people with. Till that time however, you threats
> are meaningless, empty, laughable. Just as laughable as the person who
> is making them.
>
> --
> There are none more ignorant and useless,
> than they that seek answers on their knees,
> with their eyes closed.
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Rev. Karl E. Taylor http://www.jesusneverexisted.com
> http://azhotops.blogspot.com
> A.A #1143 http://scienceblogs.com/aardvarchaeology
>
> Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
> ____________________________________________________________________
***Nobody likes me because I am telling the truths?That's is
interesting.
Frankie Lee
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:26:53 -0700, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
>
> >Frankie Lee wrote:
>
> >> God is not mock, whatever you sow, you reap.
>
> >Finally, you got something right.
>
> Like most believers he doesn't seem to understand that he himself
> reaps what he sows.
***There is a surveillance video in your home.
>
> >Yes, gods are not mocked. You can't mock something that is not there.
> >You can't mock what doesn't exist.
***Tell that to the Devils.He will be angry at you all day long.He
tried to mock God and you say he is doing all the evil works for
nothing?
>
> He's a narcissist incapable of grasping that the rest of the world
> doesn't see it through his eyes.
>
***All your messages have never shown to have any wisdom,decencies,or
decency.Well,nuts like you always increase my strength.
> There is something about religious belief that does this.
>
> >Believers in the make believe however, that is a different story. We
> >mock them all the time. We laugh in their faces, call them deluded
> >sods, giggle at their feeble attempts for FORCE the rest of the world
> >into their little mold.
>
> Idiots aren't idiots in their own eyes so they always rational reasons
> they get treated that way, with them as the good guys and us as the
> unreasonable bad guys.
>
> >You are just another in a long line of dickless idiots, screaming at the
> >world because nobody believes like you do.
>
> Too bad he is incapable of grasping this.
***Wow!You can grasp that he meant you ,Christopher-is a dickless
idiots?Foul words are something you can grasp and accept.That's sound
interesting.
I reject such nonsense.
Free Lunch
<leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
But we all know that you are not telling the truth. You hold to a
religion that demands that you lie about your doctrines and your god.
That is pathetic and immoral.
Yap
First of all, there is no bloody god.
This itself showed that you are not only a fool but a liar as well.
And what is the god of Jews had anything to do with you idiot in
Singapore?
Frankie Lee
***First of all,did Obama swear by the Bible,which contains the words
of God,and told stories about God?
First of all,Americans used the note that says,"In God we
Trust"representing a fact for all Americans' belief,does it meant
there is no god?
What kind of idiot like you,if you are caught using American dollars?
Frankie Lee
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Frankie Lee
***Don't pervert and slander.My religion demand me to lie?
In case you misunderstood again,let me repeat: All liars and
slanderers will be thrown to the lake of fires.
I preach this truths of God.
Do you accept the fact that we shouldn't lie,or slanders?Your issues
is about going to Hell for it,right?
We all know that you disregard morals,or could you tell us where you
derived or get morality?
As a Liar yourself,yet trying to accuse me of lying,which I am
not,aren't you really stupid?
Syd
So, why are you acting so foolish, fool?
PDW
Syd
No.
No one likes you because your LYING about them.
PDW
Syd
You first, son.
My religion demand me to lie?
Yep.
You've demonstrated just that here.
> In case you misunderstood again,let me repeat: All liars and
> slanderers will be thrown to the lake of fires.
>
Then I hope you have your asbestos suit on.
> I preach this truths of God.
>
The lies of god, you mean.
> Do you accept the fact that we shouldn't lie,or slanders?Your issues
> is about going to Hell for it,right?
>
Nope.
Or issue is with a lying theist who is so full of himself that he
insist on preaching where he is not wanted.
> We all know that you disregard morals,or could you tell us where you
> derived or get morality?
>
See? Lie right there.
> As a Liar yourself,yet trying to accuse me of lying,which I am
> not,aren't you really stupid?
Nope. Just you, Frankie the Liar.
PDW
Kadaitcha Man
ye spat out:
>> I preach this truths of God.
>>
>
> The lies of god, you mean.
What lies would they be? Hmmm?
--
Ubuntu 9.10 x64 running Windows Server 2008 in VirtualBox
16GB 1333MHz DDR3 RAM, 10 * SATA2 3GB/s HDDs as dual 3TB RAID5
8-thread Intel Extreme i7-975 @ 3.80GHz, air-cooled Thermaltake
Intel BoneTrail Motherboard
Dual nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS 1GB
Honda Sabre 1100cc V-Twin
I can wank better than you can.
PS: Jensen Interceptor in air-conditioned storage.
AleXX
> news:081244a0-ea25-4603...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> God: They, professing themselves to be wise, they become fools.
Your subject heading sounds idiotic.
If you believe "god" is a creator, then "he" can "create" anything "he"
likes. "He" can change the course of any events. "He" don't need to
prophesize.
But unfortunately, there is no "god". You are an idiot.
Frankie Lee
> > "Frankie Lee" <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
***Are you saying you are a puppet?Think!
Jimbo
LOL! So claiming that you are wise, you are really a fool?
Mitchell Holman
>> > > __ Rev. Karl E. Taylor � � � �http://www.jesusneverexisted.com
>> > > � � � � � � � � � � � � � �http://azhotop
> s.blogspot.com
>> > > A.A #1143 � � � � � � � � �http://scienceblogs.com/
> aardvarchaeology
>>
>> > > Apostle of Dr. Lao � � � � EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Direct
> or
>> > > __________________________________________________________________
>> > > __
>>
>> > ***Nobody likes me because I am telling the truths?That's is
>> > interesting.
>>
>> First of all, there is no bloody god.
>> This itself showed that you are not only a fool but a liar as well.
>> And what is the god of Jews had anything to do with you idiot in
>> Singapore?
>
> ***First of all,did Obama swear by the Bible,which contains the words
> of God,and told stories about God?
> First of all,Americans used the note that says,"In God we
> Trust"representing a fact for all Americans' belief,does it meant
> there is no god?
>
What is "all Americans' belief"?
Dan Listermann
"Frankie Lee" <leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0c95095d-5bdc-4d16...@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 1, 12:20 pm, Yap <hhyaps...@gmail.com> wrote:
***First of all,did Obama swear by the Bible,which contains the words
of God,and told stories about God?
Yes it is ironic that this strange custom of affirming the truth, be done in
the name of a pack of lies.
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
> On Oct 31, 10:26 pm, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktaylo...@getnet.net>
> wrote:
>> Frankie Lee wrote:
>>
>>> God is not mock, whatever you sow, you reap.
>> Finally, you got something right.
>>
>> Yes, gods are not mocked. You can't mock something that is not there.
>> You can't mock what doesn't exist.
>>
>> Believers in the make believe however, that is a different story. We
>> mock them all the time. We laugh in their faces, call them deluded
>> sods, giggle at their feeble attempts for FORCE the rest of the world
>> into their little mold.
>>
>> You are just another in a long line of dickless idiots, screaming at the
>> world because nobody believes like you do.
>>
>> When you can actually prove there is a god, any god, then you'll have
>> something to threaten people with. Till that time however, you threats
>> are meaningless, empty, laughable. Just as laughable as the person who
>> is making them.
>>
>
> interesting.
>
ignorant, uneducated, self absorbed, egomaniac, narcissistic, JERK.
You wouldn't know the truth if it walked up and kicked you in the balls.
You and truth do not exist in the same dimension.
And evidence is something else you have no familiarity with.
But lying, lying is the only tool you've got. And you use it like a
drunk uses booze, like an addict uses drugs. You just can't get enough
of lying for Jeebus.
The Chief Instigator
> On Nov 1, 12:09?pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Frankie Lee
>> <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>>
>>
>>
>> >wrote:
>> >> Frankie Lee wrote:
>>
>> >> > God is not mock, whatever you sow, you reap.
>>
>> >> Finally, you got something right.
>>
>> >> You can't mock what doesn't exist.
>>
>> >> mock them all the time. ?We laugh in their faces, call them deluded
>> >> sods, giggle at their feeble attempts for FORCE the rest of the world
>> >> into their little mold.
>>
>> >> You are just another in a long line of dickless idiots, screaming at the
>> >> world because nobody believes like you do.
>>
>>
>> >> When you can actually prove there is a god, any god, then you'll have
>> >> are meaningless, empty, laughable. ?Just as laughable as the person who
>> >> is making them.
>>
>> >> --
>> >> There are none more ignorant and useless,
>> >> than they that seek answers on their knees,
>> >> with their eyes closed.
>> >> ____________________________________________________________________
>> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://azhotops.blogspot.com
>> >> A.A #1143 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://scienceblogs.com/aardvarchaeology
>>
>> >> Apostle of Dr. Lao ? ? ? ? EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
>> >> ____________________________________________________________________
>>
>> >***Nobody likes me because I am telling the truths?That's is
>> >interesting.
>>
>> But we all know that you are not telling the truth. You hold to a
>> religion that demands that you lie about your doctrines and your god.
>> That is pathetic and immoral.
>
> ***Don't pervert and slander.My religion demand me to lie?
> In case you misunderstood again,let me repeat: All liars and
> slanderers will be thrown to the lake of fires.
Bullshit, "Lee". Go to a court and whine that you're being slandered in a
newsgroup, and see what happens. Even _you_ might learn something from that
train wreck.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Grand Rapids 3, Houston 1 (October 30)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, November 1 at Texas, 5:05
Free Lunch
<leea...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>On Nov 1, 12:09�pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
I have no idea whether it does or not. I note that you choose to lie to
us repeatedly about science and history.
>In case you misunderstood again,let me repeat: All liars and
>slanderers will be thrown to the lake of fires.
So, you are saying that you will be thrown in the lake of fires. I don't
believe that dogma, but you have demonstrated that you are a liar.
>I preach this truths of God.
No, you do not. You preach what you believe, what you want others to
believe, but you cannot show that your preaching has anything at all to
do with God.
>Do you accept the fact that we shouldn't lie,or slanders?Your issues
>is about going to Hell for it,right?
I don't have an issue about Hell. I think that is a silly, man-made
doctrine. What I do have is an issue with your refusal to act in an
honest manner here. You have chosen to lie to us.
>We all know that you disregard morals,or could you tell us where you
>derived or get morality?
Humans invented ethics or morality. The Bible is one of the books that
shows us the evolution of ethics. There are writings from before and
after that show how humans have changed their views. Ethics are
important to a well-functioning society. Those societies with poor
ethics suffer from it. Religion does not change that. There is no
evidence at all that any gods, even the one you worship, had anything to
do with the development of morality.
>As a Liar yourself,yet trying to accuse me of lying,which I am
>not,aren't you really stupid?
I am not a liar. The lies are coming from you. You have repeatedly lied
about what scientists have discovered and you have demonstrated pride in
your refusal to learn about science and your refusal to consider the
possibility that you preach false doctrines.
Free Lunch
in alt.talk.creationism:
>Syd, ye frothy bombard of sack, thou art unfit for any place but hell,
>ye spat out:
>
>>> I preach this truths of God.
>>>
>>
>> The lies of god, you mean.
>
>What lies would they be? Hmmm?
Since there's no evidence God exists, it's unfair to blame God for the
lies that men tell in the name of God. They are still lies, of course,
but we cannot allow the liars to excuse themselves by blaming God for
their dishonesty. Religious folks need to take responsibility for the
falsehoods they proudly repeat.
Frankie Lee
> www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php(TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
> LAST GAME: Grand Rapids 3, Houston 1 (October 30)
> NEXT GAME: Sunday, November 1 at Texas, 5:05
***Go to a court and you need to swear on a Bible,or you can chose not
to.
Jimbo
> > LAST GAME: Grand Rapids 3, Houston 1 (October 30)
> > NEXT GAME: Sunday, November 1 at Texas, 5:05
>
> ***Go to a court and you need to swear on a Bible,or you can chose not
>
In courts here in Michigan, you have to request to swear on a bible.
Legally, you can request to swear on a copy of anything you want, or
nothing at all.
Cory Albrecht
Affirming, rather than swearing on the Bible, is not seen as any less
binding by any modern court system.
Also, did you know that there are many Christians who refuse to take an
oath in God's name, refuse to swear on a Bible?
Matthew 5:33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old
time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself [NKJV: swear falsely], but shalt
perform unto the Lord thine oaths:
34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is
God's throne:
35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for
it is the city of the great King.
36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one
hair white or black.
37 But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is
more than these cometh of evil.
James 5:12 But above all things, my brethren, swear not, neither by
heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other oath: but let your
yea be yea; and your nay, nay; lest ye fall into condemnation.
Rather a bit of a conjugate with that 9th commandment.
Frankie Lee
> >> LAST GAME: Grand Rapids 3, Houston 1 (October 30)
> >> NEXT GAME: Sunday, November 1 at Texas, 5:05
>
> > ***Go to a court and you need to swear on a Bible,or you can chose not
> > to.
>
> Affirming, rather than swearing on the Bible, is not seen as any less
> binding by any modern court system.
>
> Also, did you know that there are many Christians who refuse to take an
> oath in God's name, refuse to swear on a Bible?
>
> Matthew 5:33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old
> time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself [NKJV: swear falsely], but shalt
> perform unto the Lord thine oaths:
> 34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is
> God's throne:
> 35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for
> it is the city of the great King.
> 36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one
> hair white or black.
> 37 But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is
> more than these cometh of evil.
>
> James 5:12 But above all things, my brethren, swear not, neither by
> heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other oath: but let your
> yea be yea; and your nay, nay; lest ye fall into condemnation.
>
> Rather a bit of a conjugate with that 9th commandment.
***In the place like a Court,as long as there is a glimmering chance
that the Bible can be considered to be a book one can swear by it-----
it is enough evidence that it assumed cedibility.True or not is
another discussion.
U don't understand what scriptures meant,it's best left to do research
then teaching us on it.
If one were to tell lie,and swear by the Bible,or taken any oath,there
will be swift divine judgment if it is untrue,or someone may try to
use the Oath as to affirm his Truths when there is none.It's best not
to swear by it,or should one want to do it,be very careful.
Syd
> Syd, ye frothy bombard of sack, thou art unfit for any place but hell,
> ye spat out:
>
> >> I preach this truths of God.
>
> > The lies of god, you mean.
>
> What lies would they be? Hmmm?
>
Well, for one, that one exists...
PDW
Jimbo
Long term research was completed on this very issue. The results were
that there was no evidence to show that people that swore on bibles
were any more or less likely to be truthful, nor was there evidence to
show that people that lied after swearing on the bible were any more
or less likely to experience "divine retribution or judgement" or
experience hardships than anyone else.
Kadaitcha Man
thund'rest with thy tongue, and with thy weapon nothing dares perform,
ye uttered:
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:14:06 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email>
> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>
>> Syd, ye frothy bombard of sack, thou art unfit for any place but
>> hell, ye spat out:
>>
>>>> I preach this truths of God.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The lies of god, you mean.
>>
>> What lies would they be? Hmmm?
>
> Since there's no evidence God exists
God, you're thicker than pig shit, you stupid, unthinking swine.
Think about the two questions below: <- Yes, that implies you have a brain.
Fundamental error on my part, I know.
How does one go about proving the existence of a Metaphysical X?
If said Metaphysical X chooses never to be found, just how the fuck do you
find it?
You are a shallow-thinking nitwit. You have no capacity for independent
thought.
Free Lunch
Syd <pdwri...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<dba9791b-5ba1-4ff8...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>:
Imaginary gods can be said to have told lies, can they not?
Free Lunch
>Free Lunch, ye lily-livered bag of flax, foul spoken coward, that
>thund'rest with thy tongue, and with thy weapon nothing dares perform,
>ye uttered:
>
>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:14:06 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email>
>> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>>
>>> Syd, ye frothy bombard of sack, thou art unfit for any place but
>>> hell, ye spat out:
>>>
>>>>> I preach this truths of God.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The lies of god, you mean.
>>>
>>> What lies would they be? Hmmm?
>>
>> Since there's no evidence God exists
>
>God, you're thicker than pig shit, you stupid, unthinking swine.
>
>Think about the two questions below: <- Yes, that implies you have a brain.
>Fundamental error on my part, I know.
>
>How does one go about proving the existence of a Metaphysical X?
You assume that any Metaphysical X can exist. That's fine, but it's a
totally meaningless assumption. By the way, the doctrines about God do
not make Him merely metaphysical, so your question cannot apply to the
God of Abraham.
>If said Metaphysical X chooses never to be found, just how the fuck do you
>find it?
And what is the difference between that Metaphysical X and nothing?
>You are a shallow-thinking nitwit. You have no capacity for independent
>thought.
I know the difference between reality and BS. I see no reason to waste
my time dancing around epistemological nihilism. Feel free to try that
Morris Dance by yourself.
Kadaitcha Man
blubbered:
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:24:03 -1200, in alt.talk.creationism
> Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote in
> <wftscg$ba5$l...@alt.astronomy.fitness.centerfolds.with.fat.arses.com.angola>:
>> Free Lunch, ye lily-livered bag of flax, foul spoken coward, that
>> thund'rest with thy tongue, and with thy weapon nothing dares
>> perform,
>> ye uttered:
>>
>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:14:06 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email>
>>> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>>>
>>>> Syd, ye frothy bombard of sack, thou art unfit for any place but
>>>> hell, ye spat out:
>>>>
>>>>>> I preach this truths of God.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The lies of god, you mean.
>>>>
>>>> What lies would they be? Hmmm?
>>>
>>> Since there's no evidence God exists
>>
>> God, you're thicker than pig shit, you stupid, unthinking swine.
>>
>> Think about the two questions below: <- Yes, that implies you have a
>> brain. Fundamental error on my part, I know.
>>
>> How does one go about proving the existence of a Metaphysical X?
>
> You assume that any Metaphysical X can exist.
Like I said, you're goddamned fucking thick. It is provable, as a fact, that
a Metaphysical X exists. It is also wholly demonstrable in the real world
that the Metaphysical X not only exists but that it cannot be proved to
exist. And that applies even though you, not anyone else other than you,
your very self, is 100% certain, as a fact unquestionably established, that
the Metaphysical X does indeed exist.
Of course, you've done your dash with your eternal fuckwittery proving that
you don't have the even the remotest of smarts required to comprehend the
ideas entailed by what I just wrote.
> That's fine, but it's a
> totally meaningless assumption. By the way, the doctrines about God do
> not make Him merely metaphysical, so your question cannot apply to the
> God of Abraham.
Where did doctrines come from? Do you often conjure up things that have no
bearing on what is being told to you, you pigshit thick fuckwit?
>> If said Metaphysical X chooses never to be found, just how the fuck
>> do you find it?
>
> And what is the difference between that Metaphysical X and nothing?
>
>> You are a shallow-thinking nitwit. You have no capacity for
>> independent thought.
>
> I know the difference between reality and BS. I see no reason to waste
> my time dancing around epistemological nihilism. Feel free to try that
> Morris Dance by yourself.
Well, no, the truth is you see no reason to waste your Usenet time doing
something you were never equiped for; thinking.
Yap
> On Oct 31, 10:28 pm, Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 31, 4:18 am, Frankie Lee <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > God: They, professing themselves to be wise, they become fools.
>
> > And you have no sense of irony in that statement, right?
>
> ***If you had sense that you are a fool,you wouldn't act smart here.
As usual, your reply has no substance whatsoever.
Yap
> On Oct 31, 10:26 pm, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktaylo...@getnet.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Frankie Lee wrote:
>
> > > God is not mock, whatever you sow, you reap.
>
> > Finally, you got something right.
>
> > You can't mock what doesn't exist.
>
> > mock them all the time. We laugh in their faces, call them deluded
> > sods, giggle at their feeble attempts for FORCE the rest of the world
> > into their little mold.
>
> > You are just another in a long line of dickless idiots, screaming at the
> > world because nobody believes like you do.
>
>
> > When you can actually prove there is a god, any god, then you'll have
> > are meaningless, empty, laughable. Just as laughable as the person who
> > is making them.
>
> > --
> > There are none more ignorant and useless,
> > than they that seek answers on their knees,
> > with their eyes closed.
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > http://azhotops.blogspot.com
> > A.A #1143 http://scienceblogs.com/aardvarchaeology
>
> > Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
> > ____________________________________________________________________
>
> ***Nobody likes me because I am telling the truths?That's is
> interesting.
Who would have liked a person who believed in ancient lies and fairy
tales?
Yap
> On Nov 1, 12:20 pm, Yap <hhyaps...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > This itself showed that you are not only a fool but a liar as well.
> > Singapore?
>
> ***First of all,did Obama swear by the Bible,which contains the words
> of God,and told stories about God?
> Trust"representing a fact for all Americans' belief,does it meant
> there is no god?
So, US has all the trust in a god which did not warned about the 9/11
event?
And their god did not prevent the Katrina?
What are you talking about?
>
> What kind of idiot like you,if you are caught using American dollars?
Yap
> On Nov 1, 12:09 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>
> > religion that demands that you lie about your doctrines and your god.
> > That is pathetic and immoral.
>
> ***Don't pervert and slander.My religion demand me to lie?
> In case you misunderstood again,let me repeat: All liars and
> slanderers will be thrown to the lake of fires.
>
The bible contained the verse that Israelites were his chosen people.
For you to preach means you are an outcast liar.
>
> Do you accept the fact that we shouldn't lie,or slanders?Your issues
> is about going to Hell for it,right?
to be lies.
Simple as that since the bible was found to be false.
>
> We all know that you disregard morals,or could you tell us where you
> derived or get morality?
A new born can be taught with crime as the right thing and he will
grow up a criminal.
>
> As a Liar yourself,yet trying to accuse me of lying,which I am
> not,aren't you really stupid?
Yap
> Syd, ye frothy bombard of sack, thou art unfit for any place but hell,
> ye spat out:
>
> >> I preach this truths of God.
>
> > The lies of god, you mean.
>
> What lies would they be? Hmmm?
Those words attributed to god was lies.
Did the god speak Jew or any language that his words can be recorded?
Yap
Yap
> "Frankie Lee" <leeahk...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
In fact, since US presidents put their hands on a lying book, they do
not have to adhere to any truth.
The fabrication of Bush in Iraq Saddam having WMD was a typical
example.
Free Lunch
>Free Lunch, ye doghearted tun of man, there is mischief in thee, ye
>blubbered:
>
>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:24:03 -1200, in alt.talk.creationism
>> Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email> wrote in
>> <wftscg$ba5$l...@alt.astronomy.fitness.centerfolds.with.fat.arses.com.angola>:
>>> Free Lunch, ye lily-livered bag of flax, foul spoken coward, that
>>> thund'rest with thy tongue, and with thy weapon nothing dares
>>> perform,
>>> ye uttered:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:14:06 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email>
>>>> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>>>>
>>>>> Syd, ye frothy bombard of sack, thou art unfit for any place but
>>>>> hell, ye spat out:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I preach this truths of God.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The lies of god, you mean.
>>>>>
>>>>> What lies would they be? Hmmm?
>>>>
>>>> Since there's no evidence God exists
>>>
>>> God, you're thicker than pig shit, you stupid, unthinking swine.
>>>
>>> Think about the two questions below: <- Yes, that implies you have a
>>> brain. Fundamental error on my part, I know.
>>>
>>> How does one go about proving the existence of a Metaphysical X?
>>
>> You assume that any Metaphysical X can exist.
>
>Like I said, you're goddamned fucking thick. It is provable, as a fact, that
>a Metaphysical X exists.
You know that it is not provable.
>It is also wholly demonstrable in the real world
>that the Metaphysical X not only exists but that it cannot be proved to
>exist.
So, you immediately come to my side to agree that it is not provable,
but your claim that it is demonstrable seems to be without foundation.
Thanks.
>And that applies even though you, not anyone else other than you,
>your very self, is 100% certain, as a fact unquestionably established, that
>the Metaphysical X does indeed exist.
Please, show me where I did this.
>Of course, you've done your dash with your eternal fuckwittery proving that
>you don't have the even the remotest of smarts required to comprehend the
>ideas entailed by what I just wrote.
I know enough to know that you are holding yourself in far too high of
esteem.
>> That's fine, but it's a
>> totally meaningless assumption. By the way, the doctrines about God do
>> not make Him merely metaphysical, so your question cannot apply to the
>> God of Abraham.
>
>Where did doctrines come from? Do you often conjure up things that have no
>bearing on what is being told to you, you pigshit thick fuckwit?
So, you've never read a just-so story? I doubt that.
>>> If said Metaphysical X chooses never to be found, just how the fuck
>>> do you find it?
>>
>> And what is the difference between that Metaphysical X and nothing?
>>
>>> You are a shallow-thinking nitwit. You have no capacity for
>>> independent thought.
>>
>> I know the difference between reality and BS. I see no reason to waste
>> my time dancing around epistemological nihilism. Feel free to try that
>> Morris Dance by yourself.
>
>Well, no, the truth is you see no reason to waste your Usenet time doing
>something you were never equiped for; thinking.
You only delude yourself when you try to claim that you are engaging in
competent thought.
Computer group deleted.
The Chief Instigator
>> newsgroup, and see what happens. ?Even _you_ might learn something from that
>> train wreck.
>
> ***Go to a court and you need to swear on a Bible,or you can chose not
> to.
You're far away from this state...I've never had to swear on a bible in the
jury pools that I've been summoned for in the 36 years I've been a
registered voter in this city, county, and state.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Texas 3, Houston 1 (October 30)
NEXT GAME:Thursday, November 5 vs. Manitoba, 5:05
Kadaitcha Man
these delicate creatures ours, and not their appetites, ye breathed:
Oh hum.
>> It is also wholly demonstrable in the real world
>> that the Metaphysical X not only exists but that it cannot be proved
>> to exist.
>
> So, you immediately come to my side to agree that it is not provable,
> but your claim that it is demonstrable seems to be without foundation.
> Thanks.
For the benefit of the unthinking fuckwit, that would be you, I repeat my
assertion:
It is provable, as a fact, that a Metaphysical X exists. It is also wholly
demonstrable in the real world that the Metaphysical X not only exists but
that it cannot be proved to exist.
It is your problem entirely if you fail to understand what is being said.
>> And that applies even though you, not anyone else other than you,
>> your very self, is 100% certain, as a fact unquestionably
>> established, that the Metaphysical X does indeed exist.
>
> Please, show me where I did this.
I would, and I could, but I won't. You are simply too pigshit thick to grasp
it.
>> Of course, you've done your dash with your eternal fuckwittery
>> proving that you don't have the even the remotest of smarts required
>> to comprehend the ideas entailed by what I just wrote.
>
> I know enough to know that you are holding yourself in far too high of
> esteem.
Well, someone has to do it.
>>> That's fine, but it's a
>>> totally meaningless assumption. By the way, the doctrines about God
>>> do not make Him merely metaphysical, so your question cannot apply
>>> to the God of Abraham.
>>
>> Where did doctrines come from? Do you often conjure up things that
>> have no bearing on what is being told to you, you pigshit thick
>> fuckwit?
>
> So, you've never read a just-so story? I doubt that.
So, you admit to conjuring up things that have o bearing whatsoever on the
question at hand.
>>>> If said Metaphysical X chooses never to be found, just how the fuck
>>>> do you find it?
>>>
>>> And what is the difference between that Metaphysical X and nothing?
>>>
>>>> You are a shallow-thinking nitwit. You have no capacity for
>>>> independent thought.
>>>
>>> I know the difference between reality and BS. I see no reason to
>>> waste my time dancing around epistemological nihilism. Feel free to
>>> try that Morris Dance by yourself.
>>
>> Well, no, the truth is you see no reason to waste your Usenet time
>> doing something you were never equiped for; thinking.
>
> You only delude yourself when you try to claim that you are engaging
> in competent thought.
Yet it is you who is struggling with the idea that on the one hand it is
provable, as a fact, that a Metaphysical X exists but on the other it is
also wholly impossible for it to be proved to exist.
> Computer group deleted.
Put back.
--
The monatomic neutral-genetic confining motor is faulty. You will need
to poke the navigational techno-effect fermenting field with a
counter-fastener and a synchrofluid. You may need a new focused particle
transference beam. Check the series of the technoclamp platform. Also
turn on the cryptinterphase nidulating integer stack if necessary.
Free Lunch
Why are you under the impression that repeating something without
offering any evidence to support it or logical arguments to explain it
will persuade someone to accept the unsupported assertion the second
time around?
>>> And that applies even though you, not anyone else other than you,
>>> your very self, is 100% certain, as a fact unquestionably
>>> established, that the Metaphysical X does indeed exist.
>>
>> Please, show me where I did this.
>
>I would, and I could, but I won't. You are simply too pigshit thick to grasp
>it.
So you cannot, but are too foolish to admit it.
I'm not struggling at all. I'm trying to get you to understand that your
foolish, unsupported, illogical claims don't persuade merely because you
keep repeating them like a religious fanatic.
>> Computer group deleted.
>
>Put back.
You really hate those groups. What have they done to you that they need
to be subjected to your foolishness? Deleted again.
Kadaitcha Man
> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:21:46 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email>
> wrote:
>
>> Lookout, ye fetid cockroach, thou damned tripe visaged rascal, ye
>> hassled:
>>
>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:08:37 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <an...@no.email>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Free Lunch, ye lying prince of fiends, there is not yet so ugly a
>>>> fiend
>>>> of hell as ye, ye stated:
>>>> I'm not under any impression, except that to explain the logic to
>>>> you would be a complete and utter waste of time. You don't have
>>>> what it takes to grasp the ideas, a functioning brain.
>>>
>>> You can't explain logic to anyone when you believe in talking snakes
>>> you dimwit.
>>
>> Believe in talking snakes?
>>
>> <aside>
>> Ok, everyone, back away from the retard. Back away...
>
> You believe in heave, a christian term. Therefore you believe in the
> bible. The bible includes a talking snake. Did I dumb it down enough
> for you?
See how fucked in the head you are? All that "believe in heave, [sic] a
christian term. Therefore you believe in the bible. The bible includes a
talking snake" crap of yours is a mere projection conjured up by your
pathetic imagination.
Are you mental or something?
AleXX
On Nov 1, 12:20 pm, Yap <hhyaps...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 31, 10:26 pm, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktaylo...@getnet.net>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Frankie Lee wrote:
>
> > > > God is not mock, whatever you sow, you reap.
>
> > > Finally, you got something right.
>
> > > You can't mock what doesn't exist.
>
> > > mock them all the time. We laugh in their faces, call them deluded
> > > sods, giggle at their feeble attempts for FORCE the rest of the world
> > > into their little mold.
>
> > > You are just another in a long line of dickless idiots, screaming at
> > > the
> > > world because nobody believes like you do.
>
>
> > > When you can actually prove there is a god, any god, then you'll have
> > > are meaningless, empty, laughable. Just as laughable as the person who
> > > is making them.
>
> > > --
> > > There are none more ignorant and useless,
> > > than they that seek answers on their knees,
> > > with their eyes closed.
> > > ____________________________________________________________________
>
> > > Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
> > > ____________________________________________________________________
>
> > ***Nobody likes me because I am telling the truths?That's is
> > interesting.
>
> This itself showed that you are not only a fool but a liar as well.
> And what is the god of Jews had anything to do with you idiot in
> Singapore?
> ***First of all,did Obama swear by the Bible,which contains the words
> of God,and told stories about God?
> First of all,Americans used the note that says,"In God we
> Trust"representing a fact for all Americans' belief,does it meant
> there is no god?
> What kind of idiot like you,if you are caught using American dollars?
Nice try :):)
Believing in god means there is god.
Hmmm.... very "logical" way of reasoning :):)
Lookout
wrote:
What part of it isn't true?
>
>Are you mental or something?
Found that talking snake yet?
Kadaitcha Man
They're your mad creations so you tell me.
>> Are you mental or something?
>
> Found that talking snake yet?
--