Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Can the US embassy in Beijing be used ...to hide escape prisoner ? What if stormed the US embassy to recapture the escaped convict ?
72 views
Skip to first unread message
baldeagle
Apr 28, 2012, 4:34:33 AM4/28/12
to
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-17877005
BBC reported that an escaped prisoner, Chen Guangcheng, is hiding in
the US embassy in Beijing.
The BBC report said: "Chen Guangcheng is in the US embassy in Beijing
following his dramatic escape from house arrest. Mr Chen is under "US
protection" ..."
Wao liao. This is exciting...like Hollywood movie...
Anyone know, under international laws, whether or not an embassy can
be legitimately used as a hiding place ...for the protection of an
escaped convict.
What happened, if China used the PLA to storm the US embassy ...to
recapture the escaped convict ?
In the meanwhile....the US ambassador is denying harbouring Chen, the
escaped prisioner. When asked by journalist whether Chen is hiding in
the US embassy, he answer repeatedly...No comment. Obviously, he
knows that the US embassy cannot be used as a hiding place for any
escaped convict.
BBC reported that an escaped prisoner, Chen Guangcheng, is hiding in
the US embassy in Beijing.
The BBC report said: "Chen Guangcheng is in the US embassy in Beijing
following his dramatic escape from house arrest. Mr Chen is under "US
protection" ..."
Wao liao. This is exciting...like Hollywood movie...
Anyone know, under international laws, whether or not an embassy can
be legitimately used as a hiding place ...for the protection of an
escaped convict.
What happened, if China used the PLA to storm the US embassy ...to
recapture the escaped convict ?
In the meanwhile....the US ambassador is denying harbouring Chen, the
escaped prisioner. When asked by journalist whether Chen is hiding in
the US embassy, he answer repeatedly...No comment. Obviously, he
knows that the US embassy cannot be used as a hiding place for any
escaped convict.
rst9
Apr 28, 2012, 10:10:49 AM4/28/12
to
U.S. An attack on the embassy/consulate is an attack on the U.S.
itself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._bombing_of_the_Chinese_embassy_in_Belgrade
Technically, this was an attack on China. Of course, the U.S. can get
away with it because the U.S. has the biggest and more numerous
weapons than China, as with wars in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan,
Pakistan, Iran,...
U.S. bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
US bombing of an embassy of the People's Republic of China in Belgrade
Location Belgrade, Serbia, Yugoslavia
Date May 7, 1999
Target Disputed
Attack type Aerial bombing
Deaths 3
Injured 20
Perpetrators United States
[hide] v t e
1999 NATO bombing
of Yugoslavia
Grdelica Đakovica Radio Television Serbia Belgrade streets Lužane Niš
Novi Sad Valjevo Chinese embassy Koriša
On May 7, 1999, during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia (Operation
Allied Force), five US JDAM bombs hit the People's Republic of China
embassy in the Belgrade district of New Belgrade, killing three
Chinese reporters and outraging the Chinese public. President Bill
Clinton later apologized for the bombing, stating it was accidental.
[1] Central Intelligence Agency director George Tenet testified before
a congressional committee that the bombing was the only one in the
campaign organized and directed by his agency.[2][3] The Chinese
government maintains that the bombing was a deliberate act[4] and has
always regarded the entire Kosovo operation as an illegal war by NATO.
[5]
baldeagle
Apr 28, 2012, 11:27:42 AM4/28/12
to
silly twat, stop using this nick
rst0
Apr 28, 2012, 3:11:29 PM4/28/12
to
On Apr 28, 7:10 am, rst9 <rst9w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 28, 1:34 am, baldeagle <force....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-17877005
>
> > BBC reported that an escaped prisoner, Chen Guangcheng, is hiding in
> > the US embassy in Beijing.
> > The BBC report said: "Chen Guangcheng is in the US embassy in Beijing
> > following his dramatic escape from house arrest. Mr Chen is under "US
> > protection" ..."
>
> > Wao liao. This is exciting...like Hollywood movie...
>
> > Anyone know, under international laws, whether or not an embassy can
> > be legitimately used as a hiding place ...for the protection of an
> > escaped convict.
>
> > What happened, if China used the PLA to storm the US embassy ...to
> > recapture the escaped convict ?
>
> > In the meanwhile....the US ambassador is denying harbouring Chen, the
> > escaped prisioner. When asked by journalist whether Chen is hiding in
> > the US embassy, he answer repeatedly...No comment. Obviously, he
> > knows that the US embassy cannot be used as a hiding place for any
> > escaped convict.
>
> By international law, the U.S. embassy, consulates, ARE part of the
> U.S. An attack on the embassy/consulate is an attack on the U.S.
> itself.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._bombing_of_the_Chinese_embassy_in_B...
> On Apr 28, 1:34 am, baldeagle <force....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-17877005
>
> > BBC reported that an escaped prisoner, Chen Guangcheng, is hiding in
> > the US embassy in Beijing.
> > The BBC report said: "Chen Guangcheng is in the US embassy in Beijing
> > following his dramatic escape from house arrest. Mr Chen is under "US
> > protection" ..."
>
> > Wao liao. This is exciting...like Hollywood movie...
>
> > Anyone know, under international laws, whether or not an embassy can
> > be legitimately used as a hiding place ...for the protection of an
> > escaped convict.
>
> > What happened, if China used the PLA to storm the US embassy ...to
> > recapture the escaped convict ?
>
> > In the meanwhile....the US ambassador is denying harbouring Chen, the
> > escaped prisioner. When asked by journalist whether Chen is hiding in
> > the US embassy, he answer repeatedly...No comment. Obviously, he
> > knows that the US embassy cannot be used as a hiding place for any
> > escaped convict.
>
> By international law, the U.S. embassy, consulates, ARE part of the
> U.S. An attack on the embassy/consulate is an attack on the U.S.
> itself.
>
>
> Technically, this was an attack on China. Of course, the U.S. can get
> away with it because the U.S. has the biggest and more numerous
> weapons than China, as with wars in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan,
> Pakistan, Iran,...
>
> U.S. bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade
> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
> US bombing of an embassy of the People's Republic of China in Belgrade
> Location Belgrade, Serbia, Yugoslavia
> Date May 7, 1999
> Target Disputed
> Attack type Aerial bombing
> Deaths 3
> Injured 20
> Perpetrators United States
> [hide] v t e
> 1999 NATO bombing
> of Yugoslavia
> Grdelica Ðakovica Radio Television Serbia Belgrade streets Lu¾ane Ni¹
> Technically, this was an attack on China. Of course, the U.S. can get
> away with it because the U.S. has the biggest and more numerous
> weapons than China, as with wars in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan,
> Pakistan, Iran,...
>
> U.S. bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade
> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
> US bombing of an embassy of the People's Republic of China in Belgrade
> Location Belgrade, Serbia, Yugoslavia
> Date May 7, 1999
> Target Disputed
> Attack type Aerial bombing
> Deaths 3
> Injured 20
> Perpetrators United States
> [hide] v t e
> 1999 NATO bombing
> of Yugoslavia
> Novi Sad Valjevo Chinese embassy Kori¹a
>
> On May 7, 1999, during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia (Operation
> Allied Force), five US JDAM bombs hit the People's Republic of China
> embassy in the Belgrade district of New Belgrade, killing three
> Chinese reporters and outraging the Chinese public. President Bill
> Clinton later apologized for the bombing, stating it was accidental.
*> [1] Central Intelligence Agency director George Tenet
> On May 7, 1999, during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia (Operation
> Allied Force), five US JDAM bombs hit the People's Republic of China
> embassy in the Belgrade district of New Belgrade, killing three
> Chinese reporters and outraging the Chinese public. President Bill
> Clinton later apologized for the bombing, stating it was accidental.
--------------------------------------------------------
* testified before a congressional committee that the bombing
-------------------------------------------------------------
* was the only one in the campaign organized and directed by
------------------------------------------------------------
* his agency.[2][3]
-------------
So you can say;
"The CIA planned it. The CIA directed it. The CIA wanted it done.
And the CIA did it."
TheInquirer
Apr 28, 2012, 5:09:59 PM4/28/12
to
On 29/04/2012 3:11 AM, rst0 wrote:
...
is this the modern equivalent of "veni, vidi, vermicelli da vinci?"
--
I ask, becos I'm curious.
...
> So you can say;
>
> "The CIA planned it. The CIA directed it. The CIA wanted it done.
> And the CIA did it."
...
>
> "The CIA planned it. The CIA directed it. The CIA wanted it done.
> And the CIA did it."
is this the modern equivalent of "veni, vidi, vermicelli da vinci?"
--
I ask, becos I'm curious.
rst0
Apr 28, 2012, 5:17:24 PM4/28/12
to
Take it anyway you like.
baldeagle
Apr 28, 2012, 6:27:42 PM4/28/12
to
On Apr 28, 10:10 pm, rst9 <rst9w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 28, 1:34 am, baldeagle <force....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-17877005
>
> > BBC reported that an escaped prisoner, Chen Guangcheng, is hiding in
> > the US embassy in Beijing.
> > The BBC report said: "Chen Guangcheng is in the US embassy in Beijing
> > following his dramatic escape from house arrest. Mr Chen is under "US
> > protection" ..."
>
> > Wao liao. This is exciting...like Hollywood movie...
>
.> > Anyone know, under international laws, whether or not an
> On Apr 28, 1:34 am, baldeagle <force....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-17877005
>
> > BBC reported that an escaped prisoner, Chen Guangcheng, is hiding in
> > the US embassy in Beijing.
> > The BBC report said: "Chen Guangcheng is in the US embassy in Beijing
> > following his dramatic escape from house arrest. Mr Chen is under "US
> > protection" ..."
>
> > Wao liao. This is exciting...like Hollywood movie...
>
.> > embassy can be legitimately used as a hiding place ...
>
.> By international law, the U.S. embassy, consulates, ARE part of the
.> U.S. An attack on the embassy/consulate is an attack on the U.S.
.> itself.
Yes. I am aware of this legal protection for the embassy...but ....
The question is, despite the embassy being granted the
status as "a part of the USA"...does the law explicitly give
the US ambassador in Beijing... the right to use the Beijing
embassy for activities against China...eg. use it as a base
for launching a missile targeting the China leaders...
.> > What happened, if China used the PLA to storm the US embassy
.> > to recapture the escaped convict ?
.> > Technically, this was an attack on China. Of course, the U.S.
,< > can get away with it because the U.S. has the biggest and more
.> > numerous weapons than China,
So, using the attack on the Chinese Embassy Belgrade as
a precedent, the PLA could storm the US embassy in Beijing
to recapture the escaped prisoner?
Of course, China did not have the biggest weapon nor more
numerous weapons than the USA. (the US has the largest
nuclear arsenal in the world)
For this reason, China must not storm the US embassy...unless
she is prepared for the consequences.
Wonder what the USA will do, if the PLA storm the US embassy
in Beijing. Launch an invasion of China...like Mc Arthur ?
Nusrat Rizvi
Apr 28, 2012, 9:04:18 PM4/28/12
to
rst0
Apr 28, 2012, 9:14:52 PM4/28/12
to
fact, let him leave China, and let him find out how tough it is to
make a living in the West.
baldeagle
Apr 28, 2012, 10:13:59 PM4/28/12
to
No....but it involves a basic principle.
What if the USA use its embassy in Beijing ...not only to
habour escape prisoner...but to use it as a base to
launch a missile(or drone) to kill all Chinese top leaders
during a cabinet meeting.
Does...the embassy regarded as part of USA, give it legality
to carry out such activities against China ?
rst0
Apr 28, 2012, 10:40:05 PM4/28/12
to
But if they really plan such an attack, it can be done. But you know
those people inside the building are dead ducks.
baldeagle
Apr 29, 2012, 5:56:35 AM4/29/12
to
to launch such an attack.
The point, I am trying to establish is...whether or not
under the international law, the US embassy in Beijing
could be used for activities against China, including
mounting covert regime change activities.
Jan Panteltje
Apr 29, 2012, 6:15:02 AM4/29/12
to
On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:56:35 -0700 (PDT)) it happened baldeagle
<forc...@gmail.com> wrote in
<56763c02-ec47-44ac...@qg3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:
>True.... it takes much more resources and organization
>to launch such an attack.
>The point, I am trying to establish is...whether or not
>under the international law, the US embassy in Beijing
>could be used for activities against China, including
>mounting covert regime change activities.
There is only ONE International Galactic law:
The Right Of The Strongest
<forc...@gmail.com> wrote in
<56763c02-ec47-44ac...@qg3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:
>True.... it takes much more resources and organization
>to launch such an attack.
>The point, I am trying to establish is...whether or not
>under the international law, the US embassy in Beijing
>could be used for activities against China, including
>mounting covert regime change activities.
The Right Of The Strongest
baldeagle
Apr 29, 2012, 9:53:56 AM4/29/12
to
On Apr 29, 6:15 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:56:35 -0700 (PDT)) it happened baldeagle
> <force....@gmail.com> wrote in
> On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:56:35 -0700 (PDT)) it happened baldeagle
> <56763c02-ec47-44ac-96fa-f170b4fc0...@qg3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >True.... it takes much more resources and organization
> >to launch such an attack.
> >The point, I am trying to establish is...whether or not
> >under the international law, the US embassy in Beijing
> >could be used for activities against China, including
> >mounting covert regime change activities.
>
> There is only ONE International Galactic law:
> The Right Of The Strongest
Are you saying...the international laws treating the
> >True.... it takes much more resources and organization
> >to launch such an attack.
> >The point, I am trying to establish is...whether or not
> >under the international law, the US embassy in Beijing
> >could be used for activities against China, including
> >mounting covert regime change activities.
>
> There is only ONE International Galactic law:
> The Right Of The Strongest
US embassy as US territory ...is a load of smelly
bull shit...
The law of the jungle (the rule of the strongest) is still
very much in force around the world. Western
civilization...has not advanced in spite of appearances...
and scientific progress.
But...our world has a uncanny way to balance things...
The strongest of yesterday (the British empire ) is
no more...the sole super power of today (the USA)...is
no longer super...definitely on the way down...
In the Eastern horizon ,... the day is breaking....the
sun will be rising soon.
The darkness ( ruled by the law of the jungle)...will
soon be gone.
Hallelujah, hallelujah, hallelujah..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qt2FWAbXinY&feature=related
rst0
Apr 29, 2012, 10:47:01 AM4/29/12
to
On Apr 29, 3:15 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:56:35 -0700 (PDT)) it happened baldeagle
> <force....@gmail.com> wrote in
> On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:56:35 -0700 (PDT)) it happened baldeagle
> <56763c02-ec47-44ac-96fa-f170b4fc0...@qg3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >True.... it takes much more resources and organization
> >to launch such an attack.
> >The point, I am trying to establish is...whether or not
> >under the international law, the US embassy in Beijing
> >could be used for activities against China, including
> >mounting covert regime change activities.
>
> There is only ONE International Galactic law:
> The Right Of The Strongest
Yes, completely right.
> >True.... it takes much more resources and organization
> >to launch such an attack.
> >The point, I am trying to establish is...whether or not
> >under the international law, the US embassy in Beijing
> >could be used for activities against China, including
> >mounting covert regime change activities.
>
> There is only ONE International Galactic law:
> The Right Of The Strongest
rst0
Apr 29, 2012, 10:46:18 AM4/29/12
to
applies. The U.S. is using this law every single day.
Jan Panteltje
Apr 29, 2012, 10:59:43 AM4/29/12
to
On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:47:01 -0700 (PDT)) it happened rst0
<rst0...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<741c168e-2a6d-436c...@h4g2000pbe.googlegroups.com>:
>> On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:56:35 -0700 (PDT)) it happened baldea=
1) They ask 1 million for him, that will reduce the deficit.
or
2) They kill him, and then give the body back,
I mean he is blind and could have fallen from a stair by accident.
That would solve the diplomatic problem.
Just some ideas, because I do not know if and how they can get him from that
embassy to the US? Maybe smuggle him in the diplomatic mail?
Like in a very large suitcase?
;-)
<rst0...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<741c168e-2a6d-436c...@h4g2000pbe.googlegroups.com>:
>> On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:56:35 -0700 (PDT)) it happened baldea=
>gle
>> <force....@gmail.com> wrote in
>> <56763c02-ec47-44ac-96fa-f170b4fc0...@qg3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> >True.... it takes much more resources and organization
>> >to launch such an attack.
>> >The point, I am trying to establish is...whether or not
>> >under the international law, the US embassy in Beijing
>> >could be used for activities against China, including
>> >mounting covert regime change activities.
>>
>> There is only ONE International Galactic law:
>> The Right Of The Strongest
>
>Yes, completely right.
In perspective, I have thought of two solutions:
>> <force....@gmail.com> wrote in
>> <56763c02-ec47-44ac-96fa-f170b4fc0...@qg3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>> >True.... it takes much more resources and organization
>> >to launch such an attack.
>> >The point, I am trying to establish is...whether or not
>> >under the international law, the US embassy in Beijing
>> >could be used for activities against China, including
>> >mounting covert regime change activities.
>>
>> There is only ONE International Galactic law:
>> The Right Of The Strongest
>
>Yes, completely right.
1) They ask 1 million for him, that will reduce the deficit.
or
2) They kill him, and then give the body back,
I mean he is blind and could have fallen from a stair by accident.
That would solve the diplomatic problem.
Just some ideas, because I do not know if and how they can get him from that
embassy to the US? Maybe smuggle him in the diplomatic mail?
Like in a very large suitcase?
;-)
rst0
Apr 29, 2012, 11:33:11 AM4/29/12
to
On Apr 29, 7:59 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:47:01 -0700 (PDT)) it happened rst0
> <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:47:01 -0700 (PDT)) it happened rst0
> <741c168e-2a6d-436c-b209-b5797e863...@h4g2000pbe.googlegroups.com>:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Apr 29, 3:15 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:56:35 -0700 (PDT)) it happened baldea=
> >gle
> >> <force....@gmail.com> wrote in
> >> <56763c02-ec47-44ac-96fa-f170b4fc0...@qg3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >> >True.... it takes much more resources and organization
> >> >to launch such an attack.
> >> >The point, I am trying to establish is...whether or not
> >> >under the international law, the US embassy in Beijing
> >> >could be used for activities against China, including
> >> >mounting covert regime change activities.
>
> >> There is only ONE International Galactic law:
> >> The Right Of The Strongest
>
> >Yes, completely right.
>
> In perspective, I have thought of two solutions:
> 1) They ask 1 million for him, that will reduce the deficit.
China will not pay a million dollars for him. I think the Chinese
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Apr 29, 3:15 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:56:35 -0700 (PDT)) it happened baldea=
> >gle
> >> <force....@gmail.com> wrote in
> >> <56763c02-ec47-44ac-96fa-f170b4fc0...@qg3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >> >True.... it takes much more resources and organization
> >> >to launch such an attack.
> >> >The point, I am trying to establish is...whether or not
> >> >under the international law, the US embassy in Beijing
> >> >could be used for activities against China, including
> >> >mounting covert regime change activities.
>
> >> There is only ONE International Galactic law:
> >> The Right Of The Strongest
>
> >Yes, completely right.
>
> In perspective, I have thought of two solutions:
> 1) They ask 1 million for him, that will reduce the deficit.
government will gladly let him go into exile in the U.S.
In an attempt to stir up revolt and turmoil for China, we, in a sense,
will end up with more and more of Chinese's junks and unwanted
citizens which we must somehow support. It will be a heavy cost to us
as a nation, and we are at a bad economic condition already.
> or
> 2) They kill him, and then give the body back,
> I mean he is blind and could have fallen from a stair by accident.
> That would solve the diplomatic problem.
badly on us. While he's in our embassy and in our care, we must keep
him alive at all cost.
>
> Just some ideas, because I do not know if and how they can get him from that
> embassy to the US? Maybe smuggle him in the diplomatic mail?
> Like in a very large suitcase?
> ;-)
of their hands, and that is all they wanted.
Now, the ball is in our hands. What are we going to do with him? No
one thought about it when they help him out of his house arrest. It
will be costly to us, and we are in bad economic shape already!!!!
TheInquirer
Apr 29, 2012, 1:38:51 PM4/29/12
to
are you a hypocrite or just a fuckwit ignorant of your own
inconsistency?
;-)
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qt2FWAbXinY&feature=related
baldeagle
Apr 29, 2012, 5:20:50 PM4/29/12
to
Since the time, I am allowed to use the word god...
Since ...the Wester believe in the first amendment.
;)... ;)... ;)
baldeagle
Apr 29, 2012, 6:04:27 PM4/29/12
to
On Apr 29, 11:33 pm, rst0 <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 7:59 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
.> In an attempt to stir up revolt and turmoil for China, we, in
> On Apr 29, 7:59 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
.> a sense, will end up with more and more of Chinese's junks
.> which we must somehow support.
By support, you mean the US give them
good jobs and financial help ?
Not true....Many of those rebel students of TAM
went to the USA....and found out the bitter truth...
They were left to fend for themselves without
jobs (or social security). I know...a few had to
work as kitchen helpers in SFO...in their old age.
They died disillusioned.
>
> > or
> > 2) They kill him, and then give the body back,
>
> This will reflect badly on us.
>
> > I mean he is blind and could have fallen from a stair by accident.
> > That would solve the diplomatic problem.
>
> Yes, but, since's in our hand, anything bad happens to him reflects
> badly on us. While he's in our embassy and in our care, we must keep
> him alive at all cost.
>
>
>
> > Just some ideas, because I do not know if and how they can get him from that
> > embassy to the US? Maybe smuggle him in the diplomatic mail?
> > Like in a very large suitcase?
> > ;-)
>
> At this point, I don't think the Chinese government cares. It's out
> of their hands, and that is all they wanted.
>
> Now, the ball is in our hands. What are we going to do with him? No
> one thought about it when they help him out of his house arrest.
and uprising in China.
The USA must be seen to be giving help... when these brainless
pawns are being punished by China. These idiots expects to be
given US citizenship and be taken care of ...for the rest of their
life.
bmo...@nyx.net
Apr 29, 2012, 8:35:32 PM4/29/12
to
On Apr 28, 2:09 pm, TheInquirer <alw...@ask.questions> wrote:
> On 29/04/2012 3:11 AM, rst0 wrote:
> ...> So you can say;
>
> > "The CIA planned it. The CIA directed it. The CIA wanted it done.
> > And the CIA did it."
>
> ...
>
> is this the modern equivalent of "veni, vidi, vermicelli da vinci?"
Except that Caesar's statement was true.
> On 29/04/2012 3:11 AM, rst0 wrote:
> ...> So you can say;
>
> > "The CIA planned it. The CIA directed it. The CIA wanted it done.
> > And the CIA did it."
>
> ...
>
> is this the modern equivalent of "veni, vidi, vermicelli da vinci?"
baldeagle
Apr 30, 2012, 12:15:36 AM4/30/12
to
Clinton and Geithner, the US foreign affairs 'minister' and economic
'minister' are scheduled to come to Beijing, uninvited, on Monday to
seek economic support and to ask China to take up more billions of US
debt bonds.
Unfortunately for them, the US embassy in Beijing has just provided
'protective refuge' to a convicted criminal who escaped from house
detention, which completely pissed off the Chinese leaders. China is
not in the a generous mood ...to listen to Clinton or Geithner.
Hu Jintao and Wen JiaBao would be seen as weaklings..leader without
backbone... if they are to give in to the USA. They would certainly
not risk damaging their good image at this time...just before they
retire.
The USA are a bunch of bungling idiots.
baldeagle
Apr 30, 2012, 2:20:24 AM4/30/12
to
intelligence
╠☼╣Ǚ∑§â€Ð_ID_SBR_X|||DI©*J*Ω∏lol؟♫1ﷲ☻∞= 8☺╣☼╠?
Apr 30, 2012, 6:32:46 AM4/30/12
to
is supported by (american,Israeli)west, should automatically be
discredited, until he or she proves otherwise.
Now the American support of the Iranian Green Revolution, was a nail
in it's coffin. Their leaders found out the hard way, not to ever give
another opening to the West.
Now this Chinese guy, is forever tainted, in everyone's eye.
or of course, he could be a Chinese plant in the US embassy....to get
a closer look, perhaps. We'll watch on Fox News, how this story should
continue. They always seem to know events before they happen so
consistently for the last 40 years, under Rupert
TheInquirer
Apr 30, 2012, 4:25:59 PM4/30/12
to
why hide behind Western media?
are you trying to be like the Garfield, hiding behind bigger cats to
cover his beer belly?
TheInquirer
Apr 30, 2012, 4:27:46 PM4/30/12
to
On 30/04/2012 12:15 PM, baldeagle wrote:
> The USA are a bunch of bungling idiots.
LOL! you are very smart meh?
> The USA are a bunch of bungling idiots.
baldeagle
Apr 30, 2012, 9:07:26 PM4/30/12
to
On May 1, 4:25 am, TheInquirer <alw...@ask.questions> wrote:
> On 30/04/2012 5:20 AM, baldeagle wrote:
>
> > On Apr 30, 1:38 am, TheInquirer<alw...@ask.questions> wrote:
> >>> Hallelujah, hallelujah, hallelujah..
>
> >> why are you praising the (according to you) fairy-tale character?
> >> are you a hypocrite or just a fuckwit ignorant of your own
> >> inconsistency?
>
> >> ;-)
>
> > Since Western media can say "Allah Akbar" ...
> > Since the time, I am allowed to use the word god...
> > Since ...the Wester believe in the first amendment.
>
> > ;)... ;)... ;)
>
.> hey! don't you have balls to admit your inconsistency?
> On 30/04/2012 5:20 AM, baldeagle wrote:
>
> > On Apr 30, 1:38 am, TheInquirer<alw...@ask.questions> wrote:
> >>> Hallelujah, hallelujah, hallelujah..
>
> >> why are you praising the (according to you) fairy-tale character?
> >> are you a hypocrite or just a fuckwit ignorant of your own
> >> inconsistency?
>
> >> ;-)
>
> > Since Western media can say "Allah Akbar" ...
> > Since the time, I am allowed to use the word god...
> > Since ...the Wester believe in the first amendment.
>
> > ;)... ;)... ;)
>
>
Do you mean....using the words... Allah Akbar, God, Hallelujah
is inconsistent.... with the truth...with evolution ?
Yet...you accused me of not knowing logic ?
Getting desperate...show badly on your blind believe
in the man made god.
he he he he he he he
bmo...@nyx.net
May 1, 2012, 12:35:37 AM5/1/12
to
me I "puke garbage" but when you do so, even using harsh words like
"fuckwit", he (in this case, anyway) gives you a straight (if poor)
answer.
It must be because you are good at maths :-)
TheInquirer
May 1, 2012, 11:21:32 AM5/1/12
to
On 1/05/2012 9:07 AM, baldeagle wrote:
> On May 1, 4:25 am, TheInquirer<alw...@ask.questions> wrote:
> Do you mean....using the words... Allah Akbar, God, Hallelujah
> is inconsistent.... with the truth...with evolution ?
are you trying to evade the question?
> On May 1, 4:25 am, TheInquirer<alw...@ask.questions> wrote:
> Do you mean....using the words... Allah Akbar, God, Hallelujah
> is inconsistent.... with the truth...with evolution ?
according to you ... Allah, God, ... etc are the product of
story-tellers (or maybe the story tellers themselves? or something like
that ...) ... anyway, you don't believe their existence as real, then why
do you praise God?
do you know what "Hallelujah" means in Hebrew? Surely you can Google it
up?!?
> Yet...you accused me of not knowing logic ?
... but then, why can you give a straight answer?
>
> Getting desperate...show badly on your blind believe
> in the man made god.
and i never said i don't believe in the man made god ... but _you_
yourself imply that you don't believe in god, and yet you praise
God?!? LOL! LOL! LOL!
hey you know how silly this sounds like? doesn't this this sounds like
when a potential customer walks in to iPhoney shop and asks questions
from the salesman to gain information, the salesman immediately
says the potential customer saying the iPhoney is bad, or that the
potential customer is an owner of Samsing Galaxy Note? worse still, the
iPhoney salesman then says "Samsing wan sui!" ("Long live Samsing!" in
Chinese) without understanding what it means?!? LOL! LOL! LOL!
btw, the customer is not the salesman, she/he's not trying sell
anything, he/she is just asking questions to decide whether to buy or
not. but the salesman asks the potential customer questions like "why
are you trying to sell me the Samsing phone" LOL! LOL! LOL! Have you
ever seen this kind of crappy salesman in life?
LOL! LOL! LOL!
if i am the boss, you know what i'll do to this presumptious salesman?
LOL! LOL! LOL!
>
> he he he he he he he
:-PPPPPPPPPPP
TheInquirer
May 1, 2012, 11:27:36 AM5/1/12
to
it gives him a kick that narcotics cannot?
> It must be because you are good at maths :-)
just copy from Ramanujan. i learned to copy by asking questions from
Google. you can Google too, right?
bmo...@nyx.net
May 1, 2012, 12:30:52 PM5/1/12
to
baldeagle
May 1, 2012, 4:55:30 PM5/1/12
to
On May 1, 11:21 pm, TheInquirer <alw...@ask.questions> wrote:
> On 1/05/2012 9:07 AM, baldeagle wrote:
>
> > Yet...you accused me of not knowing logic ?
>
> don't say "accused". i was just asking, questioning, like i always do
> ... but then, why can you give a straight answer?
>
I am also asking question. Why can't you give
> On 1/05/2012 9:07 AM, baldeagle wrote:
>
> > Yet...you accused me of not knowing logic ?
>
> don't say "accused". i was just asking, questioning, like i always do
> ... but then, why can you give a straight answer?
>
a true answer ?
TheInquirer
May 2, 2012, 12:44:00 AM5/2/12
to
On 2/05/2012 4:55 AM, baldeagle wrote:
> On May 1, 11:21 pm, TheInquirer<alw...@ask.questions> wrote:
...
> On May 1, 11:21 pm, TheInquirer<alw...@ask.questions> wrote:
> I am also asking question. Why can't you give
> a true answer ?
...
> a true answer ?
does an iPhoney salesman ask a potential customer:
why can't you sell me a good phone?
0 new messages