west human rights bullshit
mayland
it is not china choice, it is the choice of the west
they want a china like the one they fed with opium and control the trade
similarly, they want that of the arab, indian, asean and african
the western economic wealth can only be suatained with the resources of
others
do you think, the west want to live with less, be poor and your equal
why do you think USA support israel, why do you think the west is in iraq,
why do you think india is kept poor, why do you think african are poor
these are all the doing of the west, to explain all, need a few books
simply, the world resources is not enogh for all to be rich, somebody needs
to be poor
china is representing the first know resistance to the oppressed countries
the west does not want to open the flood gate to total resistance from all
the none west countries
demanding equal rights in economy
when china host the olympic, it is not so much for the rest of the world to
appreciste
it is for the chinese people to see for themselves who they are, an auditing
of their years of sacrify and work,
the government wants to show all chinese, they done their job
yes, human rights standard is not the same as the west,
what is human rights when people are starving, homeless and cold,
ask the indian and russian and the early chinese
china has managed to fed, house and cloth 1.3 billions acute poor,
do all in the world see for themselves, a miraculous feat for human rights,
children do not have to see their father line up for food from the like of
UN,
mother and sisters prostituting themselves,
when the west talk about tibet, what qualification of human rights feat had
they performed to talk,
yes, what china had done for its people, qualified themselves in every ways
to rule tibet and bring it out of adverse poverty,
france took 200 years to reach its human rights status to-day
britain from 1400 from richard IV to now
most of europe much longer
USA from freeing of the slave to now
russia with its bourgeoisie revolution at the turn of the 20th century
and australia had just right its wrong to the aboringine by apologising
china started in 1959 and today, the chinese enjoy a standard of living at
the top of developing nation,
do anybody dare to say, the china human rights standard had not provide,
dignity, pride and comfort to the chinese
what the west choose to forget is clear,
they are trying to transplant human rights without foundation
similarly
YOU CANNOT BUILD HOUSE IN MID-AIR
THE WEST CHOOSE TO DISTORT REALITY WITH ILLUSTION
go and tell a hungry, cold and homeless african he has the right to free
speech, buisness right, to protest.....etc
he will tell you, CAN I GO TO YOUR COUNTRY TO PROSTITUTE MYSELF, I GOT PAY
BETTER
THAT IS THE WEST HUMAN RIGHTS
hahahhahahehehehhehehkakakakakakakakkakakak
silly of all you who read this shit, i told them to the mite biting my balls
Jim Walsh
(in article <4818751b$1...@news.tm.net.my>):
> china started in 1959 and today, the chinese enjoy a standard of living at
> the top of developing nation,
No. China is a country with a proud 5,000 year old culture.
Being the "top of developing nation" is not high praise.
--
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive
crossposts.)
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
chatnoir
> china will never be close to european or american
> it is not china choice, it is the choice of the west
That is always the statement by Governments who violated Human rights
on a Large scale!
> they want a china like the one they fed with opium and control the trade
> similarly, they want that of the arab, indian, asean and african
> the western economic wealth can only be suatained with the resources of
> others
> do you think, the west want to live with less, be poor and your equal
If such was the case, there would be a wide difference between those
who have money and those who don't - as is the case in China now!
> why do you think USA support israel,
They seem to be a drain on US resources!
why do you think the west is in iraq,
Because of Bush and the NEOCONS!
> why do you think india is kept poor, why do you think african are poor
> these are all the doing of the west, to explain all, need a few books
> simply, the world resources is not enogh for all to be rich, somebody needs
> to be poor
Africa's big problem is corruption - Often supported by the West and
China!
>
> china is representing the first know resistance to the oppressed countries
> the west does not want to open the flood gate to total resistance from all
> the none west countries
> demanding equal rights in economy
China is good at building good projects in the third world at cost -
unlike many western concerns - Has nothing to do with oppression!
>
> when china host the olympic, it is not so much for the rest of the world to
> appreciste
> it is for the chinese people to see for themselves who they are, an auditing
> of their years of sacrify and work,
> the government wants to show all chinese, they done their job
Was not aware the Olympics would changer the economic statue of the
people in China who are poor - just the opposite! The poor moved out
for the Olympic construction projects are not in your benefit
scenario!
>
> yes, human rights standard is not the same as the west,
> what is human rights when people are starving, homeless and cold,
> ask the indian and russian and the early chinese
One does not necessarily relate to the other!
> china has managed to fed, house and cloth 1.3 billions acute poor,
> do all in the world see for themselves, a miraculous feat for human rights,
> children do not have to see their father line up for food from the like of
> UN,
> mother and sisters prostituting themselves,
Yes, this has been accomplished
>
> when the west talk about tibet, what qualification of human rights feat had
> they performed to talk,
> yes, what china had done for its people, qualified themselves in every ways
> to rule tibet and bring it out of adverse poverty,
Equality in Chinese Controlled Tibet!:
http://wolfbat359.com/repression.jpg
>
> france took 200 years to reach its human rights status to-day
> britain from 1400 from richard IV to now
> most of europe much longer
> USA from freeing of the slave to now
> russia with its bourgeoisie revolution at the turn of the 20th century
> and australia had just right its wrong to the aboringine by apologising
>
> china started in 1959 and today, the chinese enjoy a standard of living at
> the top of developing nation,
> do anybody dare to say, the china human rights standard had not provide,
> dignity, pride and comfort to the chinese
>
> what the west choose to forget is clear,
> they are trying to transplant human rights without foundation
> similarly
> YOU CANNOT BUILD HOUSE IN MID-AIR
> THE WEST CHOOSE TO DISTORT REALITY WITH ILLUSTION
> go and tell a hungry, cold and homeless african he has the right to free
> speech, buisness right, to protest.....etc
> he will tell you, CAN I GO TO YOUR COUNTRY TO PROSTITUTE MYSELF, I GOT PAY
> BETTER
> THAT IS THE WEST HUMAN RIGHTS
Well, you can PROSTITUTE YOURSELF IN COMMUNIST CHINA THEN!@
>
> hahahhahahehehehhehehkakakakakakakakkakakak
> silly of all you who read this shit, i told them to the mite biting my balls
Yes, your post is full of hysterical screeching!
bmo...@nyx.net
> china will never be close to european or american
> it is not china choice, it is the choice of the west
> they want a china like the one they fed with opium
Here's a tip: when you guys make the Opium Wars a major part of your
criticism of the West, you sound like crybaby whiners. The Opium Wars
were a long time ago. Get over it.
a of bolehland
now we can forget it because american change
let not that be our crybaby as you said
now we have the iraq war
so it is different eh!
again it is for american security eh!
no, american do not fight for security,
they fight for anything but not security,
THEY FIGHT BECAUSE AS BUSH SAID, OUR ARMY IS STRONG,
THEY THINK THEY WILL WIN
than they can get anything they want,
resources, market, oil, development projects, sale of weapons
do you think american, their president and government croynists will ever
change
DO YOU THINK HUMAN RIGHTS ARE EVER IN THE MIND OF AMERICAN GOV'N
THAT WILL BE AMERICAN BULLSHIT
exploitation stops because, the exploited stopped it, it is too costly in
exploiter lives and money,
why do you think the british willing withdraw from malaysia,
because they are bombed and shot at everyday,
why do you think the british willingly leave india, ???because their
conscience hurt them,
why do you think the dutch left indonesia,
why do you think the american leave philippine
why do you think the american live vietnam eh!
NOW IT IS JUST WHEN THE EUROPEANS AND AMERICAN WILL TUCK TAILS BETWEEN
THE LEGS AND LEAVE IRAQ AND AGFANGNISTAN
so when aggression fail, the european and american use HUMAN RIGHTS,
rightly called THEIR PIECE OF RIGHTS
THERE WILL BE NO RIGHTS FOR ASEAN, CHINESE, AFRICAN, INDIAN AND ARAB
AS LONG AS " BULLSHIT WESTERN RIGHTS EXISTED "
this is the century where the wars on bullshit western right will be fought,
not religions war and only when the rights of the non-western world is
reconized will the west ever will breath again
BRACE FOR IT
<bmo...@nyx.net> wrote in message
news:0151c80a-092a-4004...@z24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
demor...@aol.com
> yes, human rights standard is not the same as the west,
> what is human rights when people are starving, homeless and cold,
> ask the indian and russian and the early chinese
> china has managed to fed, house and cloth 1.3 billions acute poor,
> do all in the world see for themselves, a miraculous feat for human rights,
> UN,
> mother and sisters prostituting themselves,
Food is the only human right in China?
http://www.nyartsmagazine.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=194129&Itemid=747
rst0wxyz
> On Apr 30, 9:33 am, "mayland" <mayl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > yes, human rights standard is not the same as the west,
> > what is human rights when people are starving, homeless and cold,
> > ask the indian and russian and the early chinese
> > china has managed to fed, house and cloth 1.3 billions acute poor,
> > do all in the world see for themselves, a miraculous feat for human rights,
> > children do not have to see their father line up forfoodfrom the like of
> > UN,
> > mother and sisters prostituting themselves,
>
> Food is the only human right in China?
For a country that was on the brink of starvation throughout most of
their 5,000 year history, food is first on the list. Election is last
on the list.
>
> http://www.nyartsmagazine.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&...
bmo...@nyx.net
So... you don't really have anything meaningful to say. How do you get
by with that big pole up your butt?
bmo...@nyx.net
> now we can forget it because american change
It was a lot more recent than the Opium Wars. You seem like a crybaby
but I have no idea what your point is, really. You don't make a whole
lot of sense.
rst0wxyz
The Opium War may be long ago, but the residuals still remain.
Jim Walsh
(in article
<7aef4dac-6879-4cec...@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com>):
You are simply ignorant of Chinese history. Famine is extremely rare in
Chinese history. (The government created famine in during the Great Leap
Forward is one of the few.)
For most of the last 5,000 years, China has been advanced relative to the
rest of world. In science, math, art, mechanical engineering, etc. it was
superior to Europe (for example) until the 1500s.
It is interesting to speculate what gave Europe such a big boost after than,
in contrast to China.
But in any event, famine is rare in Chinese history.
J.Venning
news:0001HW.C440ED03...@news-east.alibis.com...
> You are simply ignorant of Chinese history. Famine is extremely rare in
> Chinese history. (The government created famine in during the Great Leap
> Forward is one of the few.)
>
of Chinese history. Famine rare in Chinese history ? Up yours Walsh, with
knobs on it !
rst0wxyz
> On Fri, 2 May 2008 04:03:22 +0800, rst0wxyz wrote
> (in article
> > On May 1, 12:52 pm, demoris...@aol.com wrote:
> >> On Apr 30, 9:33 am, "mayland" <mayl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > For a country that was on the brink of starvation throughout most of
> > their 5,000 year history, food is first on the list. Election is last
> > on the list.
>
> You are simply ignorant of Chinese history.
Don't accuse others ignorance through your own ignorance.
> Famine is extremely rare in
> Chinese history.
I myself had seen famine in China during and following WWII, and I
lived in China for only 11 years. I have said my next door neighbor
on our left starved to death during WWII. I have said if there were
ever a miracle, the flowering of the bamboos after WWII was a miracle
that saved many Chinese families from starvation.
The Huang He wasn't called "China's sorrow" because of the water
flowing from it.
> (The government created famine in during the Great Leap
> Forward is one of the few.)
>
> For most of the last 5,000 years, China has been advanced relative to the
> rest of world.
In the old days, what was considered to be advanced when everything
moved by wind or human or horse power or water buffalo power?
> In science, math, art, mechanical engineering, etc. it was
> superior to Europe (for example) until the 1500s.
Oh!! no, not the compass, gun powder, printing press,... again!!!
When will this ever stop?
>
> It is interesting to speculate what gave Europe such a big boost after than,
> in contrast to China.
The industrial revolution, you stupid ass.
And Emperor QianLong said China has no need for such ingenious
articles or British manufactures.
>
> But in any event, famine is rare in Chinese history.
You are an ignorant idiotic fool.
bmo...@nyx.net
But it's silly to blame people today for that as this fella does.
J.Venning
news:faaca99e-e722-4095...@k1g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
On May 2, 1:08 am, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@gmNOail.com> wrote:
>> You are simply ignorant of Chinese history.
>>
>Don't accuse others ignorance through your own ignorance.
>
Chinese history, so much so that he is telling the Chinese people what to do
with their lives and how to govern themselves. In actual fact, he is nothing
but a failure who turned homosexual, leaving his wife and children in the
United States to play with men's shitholes in Taiwan.
J.