Biden: Israel has right to deal with nuclear Iran - The U.S. allows Israel a free hand with whatever Israel wants, but objects to Iran haven't unclear weapons. Is this fair?
rst0wxyz
Sun Jul 5, 2009 9:24pm
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE56507F20090706
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Israel has a sovereign right to decide what is
in its best interest in dealing with Iran's nuclear ambitions whether
the United States agrees or not, U.S. Vice President Joe Biden said in
an interview on Sunday.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has signaled that he agrees
with U.S. President Barack Obama's end-of-the-year deadline for
progress in efforts to engage Iran diplomatically to resolve dispute
over its nuclear program.
In an interview on ABC's "This Week" program, Biden said Israel can
determine for itself how best to deal with the threat of a nuclear-
armed Iran.
"We cannot dictate to another sovereign nation what they can and
cannot do when they make a determination, if they make a
determination, that they're existentially threatened," Biden said.
Netanyahu, who took office in March, has said Israel cannot allow
Tehran to acquire nuclear weapons and has not ruled out a possible
military strike against Iran.
Israel has said a nuclear-armed Iran would be a threat to its
existence, noting Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's calls for
Israel to be wiped off the map. Iran denies it is enriching uranium
for military purposes, saying its nuclear development is aimed at
generating electricity.
Israel bombed a site in Syria in 2007 that U.S. intelligence officials
said was a nearly completed nuclear reactor being built with North
Korean help. In 1981, Israel bombed an Iraqi nuclear reactor.
"If the Netanyahu government decides to take a course of action
different than the one being pursued now, that is their sovereign
right to do that. That is not our choice," Biden said. "But there is
no pressure from any nation that's going to alter our behavior as to
how to proceed."
The U.N. Security Council has imposed three sets of sanctions on
Tehran for defying its demand to suspend uranium enrichment, which
could also be used to produce nuclear weapons.
The United States has joined Russia, China, France, Germany and
Britain in inviting Iran to talks to resolve the nuclear dispute.
Israel's Mossad intelligence chief Meir Dagan said last month a world
embargo had altered the course of Tehran's nuclear program since 2003,
but that Iran could have an atomic weapon by 2014 unless these steps
were intensified.
(Reporting by JoAnne Allen; editing by Mohammad Zargham)
abian...@yahoo.com
Hey Rusty Old Fool you said a long time ago that Chairman Mao is same
poster as Xangdi, and now you say he is not, after I have told
everyone that you told me so. I guess you are really crazy! Maybe your
gf doesn't want to suck your little prick anymore. Haha! You are so
dumb. You should go to a shrink. I mean it. You are 一個變態的神經病人, 瘋人院里爬出來
的.
On Jul 5, 9:49 pm, rst0wxyz <rst0w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Biden: Israel has right to deal with nuclear Iran
> Sun Jul 5, 2009 9:24pmhttp://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE56507F20090706
Quadibloc
Letting them have nuclear weapons would be bad. Israel is a modern
democratic country of peaceful people. It's not their fault that
terrorists keep attacking them to punish them for not being driven
into the sea when the surrounding Arab nations attacked them for
insisting on an independent state instead of being massacred or raped
by rioting Arabs.
Not all Muslims, though, are as bad as this.
Some do just want to be left alone to live in peace. But they are set
upon and made to suffer. And they finally dare to engage in peaceful
protest.
And so the Chinese police come in and brutally suppress it, which
leads to them finally snapping. And only the resultant fighting is
shown on Chinese TV, to try and convince the Chinese people that
Uighurs are violent.
How do we know that the Chinese media is lying, and the dissidents are
telling the truth? Why can't those seeking Uighur independence be
lying terrorists?
Oh, the answer is really simple.
If the Chinese government told the truth about things, then our
Western reporters could go about the country freely and confirm the
real truth. The Chinese government wouldn't try to control the
Internet the way it does. They wouldn't lock people up for revealing
"state secrets" who try to address official corruption and injustice.
This is how we know who is lying and telling the truth.
American TV reporters wander around in Israel, but not in Iran.
John Savard
ltlee1
I don't know to what degree reporters are not allowed in Xinjiang. So
I will comment on the line of reasoning
Let us say a couple had a fight. The husband showed a video clip in
which the wife had kicked him repeatedly.
Of course, no one should jump to the concludion that the wife must be
wrong because she was the one seen kicking. Obviously, evidence form
one side does not necessarily tell the whole truth. However, it will
be
more ridiculous to conclude that the husband must be the guilty party
since he refused to have monitoring devices installed in the couple's
bedroom.
abia...@mindless.com
www.thailovelinks.com .
Here are my websites:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/64156901@N00/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/meichi_cunt_aka_abianchen_filthy_smelly_pussy/
You like?
On Jul 6, 9:22 am, Quadibloc <jsav...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote: