Netanyahu Scores Victory as US Abandons All Settlement Demands
NOMOREWARS_FORISRAEL
Additional at http://AMERICA-HIJACKED.COM
last_per...@yahoo.com
wrote:
> Netanyahu Scores Victory as US Abandons All Settlement Demands
No surprise to me. This is the usual way it runs.
ZioNazis made an offer Obammy & Klintoon couldn't refuse.
>
> http://america-hijacked.com/2009/11/02/netanyahu-scores-victory-as-us...
>
> http://tinyurl.com/y8wuora
>
> Additional athttp://AMERICA-HIJACKED.COM
Al Smith
> On Nov 2, 3:20 pm, NOMOREWARS_FORISRAEL <NOWARS_FORISR...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>> Netanyahu Scores Victory as US Abandons All Settlement Demands
>
> No surprise to me. This is the usual way it runs.
>
> ZioNazis made an offer Obammy & Klintoon couldn't refuse.
>
As I said here when everyone was yapping about how tough Obama was
being on Israel, Obama is Israel's bitch. When he went to the annual
AIPAC meeting during his presidential campaign, got down on his
knees, and kissed the asses of all the AIPAC leaders, *that* was
Obama's position on Israel. Nothing has changed.
-Al-
docremington
Al Smith wrote:
> As I said here when everyone was yapping about how tough Obama was
> being on Israel, Obama is Israel's bitch. When he went to the annual
> AIPAC meeting during his presidential campaign, got down on his
> knees, and kissed the asses of all the AIPAC leaders, *that* was
> Obama's position on Israel. Nothing has changed.
>
0'Bummah's electorate-supporters are having a nervous breakdown for a
change, hopefully.
Aviroce
Arab leaders. Something else will transpire.
On Nov 2, 3:20 pm, NOMOREWARS_FORISRAEL <NOWARS_FORISR...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Netanyahu Scores Victory as US Abandons All Settlement Demands
>
Aviroce
Al, I understand fully what you are saying. The argument used by the
Israeli gangster is plausible. It can also be construed as not
imposing preconditions. Let us look at it now.
If he does not continue the settlements intended to provide schooling
for the bastard Jewish children, then he would have to ask all
settlers to vacate the premises---basically withdraw from Palestinian
territory. But withdrawal is supposed to be after the negotiations
not before it. So 'plausible' is the correct way to describe the
gangster's argument. The fact that Clinton accepted it could be
construed as assuming the gangster's premise then work to undermine
it. By the way I saw the gangster on TV saying that to the president
(We are constructing only schools and medical facilities for the
(settlers).)
If Clinton is following that method of arguing then Clinton is
deceiving the Jewish gangster. The main idea must be consistent with
President Obama's objective--establish a viable Palestinian state. I
think Clinton is using that well-known argument method to subvert the
Jewish gangster. (I forgot the name of that method of argument.)
On Nov 2, 10:06 pm, Al Smith <inva...@address.com> wrote:
Cormac
wrote:
> Netanyahu Scores Victory as US Abandons All Settlement Demands
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/y8wuora
>
> Additional athttp://AMERICA-HIJACKED.COM
Why are Israeli colonies always described as settlements?
Cormac
last_per...@yahoo.com
Unfortunately, as long as most Americans remain stupid, the ZioNazi
grip
will be there. Turning off the TV might be a fine first step.
Al Smith
Not watching the propaganda tube is essential to regaining
self-awareness. I stopped watching regular television several years
ago. That's when I began to be aware of some of the shit that was
going on in the world -- things that never got talked about on
television, other than to mock them or dismiss them.
The key thing is the Zionists -- they are responsible for so much
that is wrong with the world. Since they control television, you
will never see anything but their propaganda message on the
television. Anything contrary to their message gets marginalized. It
is ignored entirely, or it is set up like a straw man to be knocked
over and spat upon by Zionist shills.
It's amazing how obvious the crimes of the Zionists become once you
get out from under their ceaseless propaganda stream. I pity the
people who defend their message, because those people don't have a
clue as to how brainwashed they are, or how completely wrong they
are in their thinking. They don't know there is a problem, so they
can't even try to correct it.
-Al-
Voice of Ignorance
You are asking everybody. Hopefully a Zionst would tell you why.
As far as I am concerned, both have similar meanning if you look at
the history of the United States of America. When the European
colonists established their colonies they "settled" the land.
Cormac
> On Nov 5, 1:31 am, Cormac <cormac.brada...@gmail wrote
>
> > Why are Israeli colonies always described as settlements?
>
> > Cormac
>
> You are asking everybody. Hopefully a Zionst would tell you why.
> As far as I am concerned, both have similar meanning if you look at
> the history of the United States of America. When the European
> colonists established their colonies they "settled" the land.
Ethnic cleansing?
Cormac.
dsharavi
wrote:
> Netanyahu Scores Victory as US Abandons All Settlement Demands
So? Rabin scored the same "victory" in 1993 and 1994. He did that
merely by stating -- and holding to -- the following:
"The coming years will be marked by the extension
of construction in greater Jerusalem."
"The government will continue to reinforce Jewish settlement
along the confrontation lines, because of its importance for
security, and in metropolitan Jerusalem. There is no disagreement
in this house concerning Jerusalem's being the eternal capital
of Israel. Jerusalem, whole and unified, has been and forever
will be the capital of the people of Israel under Israeli
sovereignty, the focus of every Jew's dreams and longings.
This government is firm in its resolve that Jerusalem is
not a subject for bargaining."
"Israeli settlements in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza will remain
under Israeli rule with no change in their status."
"In whatever negotiation, we will be firm in our stand that
Jerusalem is and will continue to be united and our eternal
capital. From our perspective, Jerusalem of Gold, of Copper,
and of Light - is ours."
Yitzhak Rabin, July 1993
"The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent
solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the
Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines."
"We committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement,
and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single
settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to
hinder building for natural growth."
"Jerusalem has always been and is today the eternal
capital of the State of Israel and the heart of the Jewish
people."
Yitzhak Rabin, December 1994
The results of Rabin's stance: the Palestinians signed Oslo I. Jordan
signed the Arab world's second peace treaty with Israel, and the
Palestinians signed Oslo 2, when settlement activity was continuing.
Settlement activity is just another excuse for the Palestinians to
avoid creating the state they don't really want.
Deborah
Aviroce
You know now that cannot hold true. First, settlements in Gaza are
over and done with. So it remains to destroy the settlements in East
Jerusalem and West Bank. Contract under duress is not a contract. It
is coercion. For a contract to exist in this case all, ALL,
Palestinians, PALESTINIANS, must vote to approve it. This means
voting will take place all over the world community to get the
Palestinian vote.
Israel is not just fighting the Palestinians in their Israeli
Concentration Camps. Israel is taking the words of prisoners as final
words for all Palestinians. That is a fallacy.
Even President Obama will not consider any of these as binding. Hamas
does not accept any of these coercive statements.
Moreover, what is left of Palestine if the Israeli occupation takes it
over? Nothing. So tell Rabin about it.
Aviroce
Apartheid Government of the Israeli Colony.
Jews don't like ethnic cleansing done to them. They enjoy when they
do it to others. Look at the Talmuds, Torahs and Protocols of the
Learned Leaders of Zion, in addition to Deborahs quotes below.
partisan
> Ethnic cleansing. It is all over Israel as sanctioned by the
> Apartheid Government of the Israeli Colony.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! TO CLEAN EVERY PLACE ON EARTH FROM THE ARAB
SHIT IS A GOOD DEED INDEED!
> Jews don't like ethnic cleansing done to them. They enjoy when they
> do it to others. Look at the Talmuds, Torahs and Protocols of the
> Learned Leaders of Zion, in addition to Deborahs quotes below.
>
> On Nov 7, 1:29 am, Cormac <cormac.brada...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 6, 6:17 am, Voice of Ignorance <dudaras...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 5, 1:31 am, Cormac <cormac.brada...@gmail wrote
>
> > > > Why are Israeli colonies always described as settlements?
>
> > > > Cormac
>
> > > You are asking everybody. Hopefully a Zionst would tell you why.
> > > As far as I am concerned, both have similar meanning if you look at
> > > the history of the United States of America. When the European
> > > colonists established their colonies they "settled" the land.
>
> > Ethnic cleansing?
>
> > Cormac.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Aviroce
Palestinians. The Palestinians are coming back home to their homeland
and you are getting out.
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Honest truth
http://www.gamla.org.il/english/feature/lynch2a.htm
> Boy, your problem is not with the Arabs. Your problems are with the
> Palestinians. The Palestinians are coming back home to their homeland
> and you are getting out.
--
嚙踝蕭Of all the extreme fanaticism which plays havoc in man嚙踝蕭s nature, there is
not one as irrational as anti-Semitism. 嚙皺 If the Jews are rich [these
fanatics] are victims of theft. If they are poor, they are victims of
ridicule. If they take sides in a war, it is because they wish to take
advantage from the spilling of non-Jewish blood. If they espouse peace, it
is because they are scared by their natures or traitors. If the Jew dwells
in a foreign land he is persecuted and expelled. If he wishes to return to
his own land, he is prevented from doing so.嚙踝蕭
Lloyd George
kangarooistan
> Boy, your problem is not with the Arabs. Your problems are with the
> Palestinians. The Palestinians are coming back home to their homeland
> and you are getting out.
INDEED , its only a matter of time
Once the jews have bankrupted EVERY western taxpayer Israel will be
swept from the map
its only a matter of time , it matters NOT how long it takes
kanga
======
so how come the Taliban are going to DEFEAT the greatest military
force in all history
General Cosgrove also spoke pessimistically about the war in
Afghanistan, saying success so far is only imaginary.
He says the conflict represents a battle for the minds of Muslims
across the world - a battle the Coalition is losing.
In a broad-ranging ABC Boyer lecture series , former defence force
chief Peter Cosgrove expresses pessimism about the course of the
Afghanistan war
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/boyerlectures/about/
In his opening lecture tomorrow, he acknowledges the high cost of
defending Australia .
"Every person who rails against the huge cost of a modern national
security policy is perfectly correct -- the costs are obscene," he
says.
But fundamentally, Australians accept that there is no defence
General Cosgrove says Australians remain troubled by the intractable
violence in Afghanistan.
"Success is yet only in the imagination and in prayers," he says.
Like Iraq , the Afghanistan war continues to provide a "battleground
for the minds" of Muslims around the world.
"I think we can confidently say we are losing this battle."
Yet despite no muslim threat having any jet fighters submarines or
army , they are DEFEATING those who WASTE billions on failed
military approach , its very clear existing wars are only expensive
GAMES to play with big toys and cream off billions from gullible
taxpayers and low IQ meat headed cannon fodder who are kept from
reading the FACTS
Australia will waste another $16 billion on the USA F-35 Joint Strike
Fighter program.
To prop up USA military / war business machine Australian taxpayers
are wasting hundreds of billions on useless technology surplus scrap
metal bought at inflated prices from USA middle men
* Related Story: New subs to replace Collins Class fleet
* Related Story: Defence plans to build super bases
* Related Story: Questions over F-35's stealth capability
Peter Cosgrove
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Cosgrove
General Peter John Cosgrove AC, MC (born 28 July 1947) is a retired
Australian Army officer.
Cosgrove was promoted in 2000 to Lieutenant General as Chief of the
Army (CA) and in 2002 to General as Chief of the Defence Force (CDF).
[5]
He was the Chief of the Australian Defence Force from 3 July 2002 to 3
July 2005, when he retired from active service.
In a broad-ranging ABC Boyer lecture series , former defence force
chief Peter Cosgrove expresses pessimism about the course of the
Afghanistan war
[edit] Military service
Cosgrove was educated at Waverley College, then followed his father, a
Warrant Officer, into the Australian Army by attending the Royal
Military College, Duntroon in 1965. Early in his career, Cosgrove
fought in Vietnam with the 9th Battalion of The Royal Australian
Regiment, where he served with great distinction, receiving the
Military Cross in 1971.[1]
'Obscene' defence costs are necessary
Posted Sun Nov 8, 2009 5:44pm AEDT
Updated Sun Nov 8, 2009 8:00pm AEDT
The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)
Australia will spend $16 billion on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
program.
* lated Story: New subs to replace Collins Class fleet
* Related Story: Defence plans to build super bases
* Related Story: Questions over F-35's stealth capability
Former Defence Force chief Peter Cosgrove says the cost of defence
spending is "immense" and "obscene" but remains a necessity.
General Cosgrove has delivered the first of six lectures on national
security as part of ABC Radio National's Boyer Lectures series.
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/boyerlectures/about/
He says there is no cheap solution to Defence's need to modernise and
in all likelihood dramatically expand.
"When 100 years ago local fire brigades changed from horse-drawn to
motorised appliances, many people were aghast at the cost but didn't
quibble if it meant that they were safer," General Cosgrove said.
"Fundamentally Australians accept there is no cheap defence.
so how come the Taliban are going to DEFEAT the greatest military
force in all history
General Cosgrove also spoke pessimistically about the war in
Afghanistan, saying success so far is only imaginary.
He says the conflict represents a battle for the minds of Muslims
across the world - a battle the Coalition is losing.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/11/08/2736476.htm?section=australia
Al Nakba
their true homeland is in the palace pandemonium in hell.
dsharavi
> I heard you loud and clear.
Obviously not. No surprise there.
Deborah
Aviroce
On Nov 9, 5:21 am, partisan <xxa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Aviroce
MOST OF THEM ARE REFUGEES ALL OVER THE WORLD.
On Nov 9, 9:12 am, Honest truth <Honest_tr...@Wisdom.net> wrote:
> See how they run their so-called state now.
>
> http://www.gamla.org.il/english/feature/lynch2a.htm
>
> > Boy, your problem is not with the Arabs. Your problems are with the
> > Palestinians. The Palestinians are coming back home to their homeland
> > and you are getting out.
>
> --
> “Of all the extreme fanaticism which plays havoc in man’s nature, there is
> not one as irrational as anti-Semitism. … If the Jews are rich [these
> fanatics] are victims of theft. If they are poor, they are victims of
> ridicule. If they take sides in a war, it is because they wish to take
> advantage from the spilling of non-Jewish blood. If they espouse peace, it
> is because they are scared by their natures or traitors. If the Jew dwells
> in a foreign land he is persecuted and expelled. If he wishes to return to
> his own land, he is prevented from doing so.”
>
> Lloyd George
Aviroce
DISASTER HIT THE PALESTINIANS WITH THE INVASION BY JEWS. NOW THE
PALESTINIANS WILL MANAGE TO GET BACK WHAT THEY LOST.
> their true homeland is in the palace pandemonium in hell.- Hide quoted text -
Aviroce
IS DOING THAT. THE PALESTINIANS ARE TRYING TO DO THAT. BUT THERE IS
A DIFFERENCE. THE PALESTINIANS ARE WORKING FOR THEIR OWN HOMELAND AND
THE JEWS ARE WORKING FOR THEIR COLONY. HOMELAND IS MUCH STRONGER THAN
A COLONY. THE COLONISTS WIL ABANDON PLAN. SEE THE PRESSURE BUILDING.
> > >Deborah- Hide quoted text -