Baangaldeshi says RovindrauGoaT was a scoundrel laureate
VognoDuut750
no University in Dacca then the entire population would face a situation
like Nepal or Bhutan or Afghanistan. What was the prime reason for
Bishwa-Kobi-Raj-Guru to oppose this University? Do we have answer? Indeed
Bishwa-Kobi-Raj-Guru was communally motivated
Factual Perspective on Sonar Bangla
Thursday April 27 2006 19:44:23 PM BDT
Mohammad Abdullah ,U.S.A.
I thank both Mr. Abid Bahar (Canada) and Mr. Saleh Ahmad (Bangladesh) for
their deliveries at NFB concerning the present National Anthem of
Bangladesh. I would add further information to their notes. Their
observations and perspectives are highly valued.
Regarding Bengali culture, let us get back for a moment to Sarat Chandra
Chatterjee. In his wonderful writing we found "Bangalee Chhelera Musholmaan
Chheleyder Sathey Khelchhey .football(?).. " What does "Bangalee Chheley" or
"Musholmaan Chheley" mean while the game was going on presumably in the
Hooghly Mohsin College playground? There must be a clear distinction between
the two groups that Sarat Chandra Chatterjee observed. This infamous writing
is very famous to the Hindus, in particular. Of course there are some blind
supporters of this infamous text and those who are the Bengali-speaking
Muslims. Sarat Chatterjee has defined the Bengali culture in this way.
Further he has written: ".... Nerhrey Holey Ki Hobey, Ra(n)dhey Valo .."
From where Nerhey came in Sarat Chatterjee's text? We know clearly that
Sarat Chatterjee coined GAFOOR wherein he enjoyed the hearts of the Muslim
readers. This is how diehard Hindus had observed the Muslims though both
speak the same language. The irony is that a Hindu eats "Hindu Mangsho"
while a Muslim eats "Gosto (or Gos-t)" or simply "Gosh." The difference
remains between the PANI and the JOL.
In the same way if one observes Bishwa Kobi-Raj-Guru's writing the same
trickery will be visible. Rahamat Kabuliwala is a murderer, a character of a
Muslim. Is this true that each Afghan Pathan is a murderer?
.
Bishwa Kobi-Raj-Guru ignored such historical facts but decided to portray a
Muslim character as a murderer. This mean writer also enjoyed the hearts of
the Hindus and Muslims alike regarding Rahamat Kabuliwala as the loving
father and heart-breaking affection for a daughter. This baloney logic is no
where nearer to viewing Rahamat as a murderer.
No one finds Muslim characters in the massive production machine of Bishwa
Kobi-Raj-Guru except for Rahamat and in Musholmaani Didi. A Hindu pronounces
Musolmaan as Musholmaan as found in Oi-ishlamic instead of Islamic. Bishwa
Kobi-Raj-Guru had the same problem and deliberately ignored 57%
Bengali-speaking Muslims. No wonder that the Bengali-speaking land was
eventually divided. Such a scoundrel laureate was one of the responsible
fellows for the partition because of his Hindu-oriented role being a member
of the Brahma Samaj.
If he had any sense of humanity as a laureate then he would not have pursued
to stop establishing the University in Dacca. Ashutosh Mukerjee initially
opposed with his lawyer group members. His main instrumental was infamous
communal Jadu Nath Sarkar. In order to strengthen the team against the
establishment of the University in Dacca these communal despots gathered to
include Bishwa-Kobi-Raj-Guru.
The amazing thing is this laureate Bishwa-Kobi-Raj-Guru accepted such an
invitation and worked against the establishment of the University to be
located in Dacca. As a trade Bishwa-Kobi-Raj-Guru tried to install his
son-in-law (husband of Myra Devi) Mr. Gangopadhaya (of Barisal origin;
1889 - 1956) as a Faculty member in Soil Science (basically Soil Chemistry
and Geology) at the University of Calcutta. This 21-year old son-in-law had
a Bachelor's degree then from the University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign.
Somehow hiring committee did not approve a Bachelor's holder to be a Faculty
at the University of Calcutta. Even then Bishwa-Kobi-Raj-Guru continued
tuning his focus on damaging the approval of the new University. At that
time he was already a Nobel Laureate.
This shameless laureate fought shoulder to shoulder with the management by
shaking hands with the communal group members of the University of Calcutta
as well as the lawyers of the Calcutta Court. HOW MANY BANGLADESHIS ARE
PROUD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DACCA? These sons of the soil must speak loudly
that they are the products of that institution. HOW MANY BANGLADESHIS KNOW
THAT Bishwa-Kobi-Raj-Guru OPPOSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SAME UNIVERSITY
BETWEEN 1910 AND 1920?
Why the Bangladeshis need to honor such a scoundrel laureate? If there was
no University in Dacca then the entire population would face a situation
like Nepal or Bhutan or Afghanistan. What was the prime reason for
Bishwa-Kobi-Raj-Guru to oppose this University? Do we have answer? Indeed
Bishwa-Kobi-Raj-Guru was communally motivated
Evidence shows that when Chandrasekhar Venkat Raman died in 1970, at that
time no scholarly people attended his funeral. Almost every Indian knew this
despotic character as a great CHEAT of the science and technology arena.
Poor Krishnan ultimately died as a madcap. If Raman could be honored in this
way in India then why Bangladeshis are hesitant to abolish a communal
laureate from the political and literal playground pf Bangladesh? A bill
must be taken by the Parliament to approve the change of the National Anthem
of Bangladesh.
A Bangladeshi must be the writer of such a National Anthem that nation can
sing better without breaking tongue. Furthermore, the compatriots will not
have to come across a communal any more. The nation will look perfect as
filled with Bangladeshi citizens.
Finally, Bishwa Kobi-Raj-Guru had no connection with Bangladesh before 1947
and after 1947. His no family member or relatives belong to Bangladesh. His
son-in-law was a British citizen and died there. His situation is not the
same as Kazi Nazrul Islam. Again, Bishwa Kobi-Raj-Guru is not the National
Poet of Bangladesh. Such a laureate has no room in India as well as a
National Poet.
The prime reason for that he regarded as a scoundrel tout writer who had no
fame in any branch of literature. Name any branch - he has touched, but
never acquired championship. He has no parallel work compared to the
champions in other languages. He was a mere reproducer and copier of old
works of some less known people such as Lalan Fakir. He also stole many
concepts from the Persian literature beside English competitors. Why
Bangladeshis need to bother about such a stupid garbage copier? Since his
ashes were thrown in Bhagirathi then we need to throw his legacies in the
Bay of Bengal.
Mohammad Abdullah ,U.S.A.
Torpedo
Mohammad. Got it Beggardeshi Muslim gandu ?
"VognoDuut750" <VognoD...@zilmore.com> wrote in message
news:m8OdnQQy7tA...@comcast.com...