RACISM IS DESTRUCTIVE TO AMERICA, LEADS ADELSON BUY THE PRESIDENT

[Aviroce]

JEWS ARE SPECIAL PHENOMENON THAT AMERICANS ARE UNAWARE OF AND NEED TO
BE INFORMED ABOUT AS IT IS DESTROYING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND
ITS PEOPLE. JEWS ARE NOT REALLY AMERICANS. THEY ARE ISRAEL CITIZENS
LIVING ABROAD AND RECRUITING FORCES TO HELP ISRAEL AND GETTING RICH IN
THE PROCESS BY SUCKING AMERICAN BLOOD AND TREASURE FOR JEWS ONLY.
READ MORE JACK ASS:
B. Cramer (B.H. Cramer" <ben_alw...@beltingyids.com>) posted:

"The General Assembly, [***] Determines that
Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination."-
UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NUMBER 3379
REVOKED UNDER ZIONIST PRESSURE BY RESOLUTION NUMBER 4686
http://www.jewishracism.com/quotes.htm


Friday, 9/12/2008


QUOTE OF THE DAY
"The way I see it, the fact of the Jews' racial peculiarity will
necessarily
influence their social relations with non-Jews. The conclusions
which-
in my
opinion-the Jews should draw is to become more aware of their
peculiarity in
their social way of life and to recognize their own cultural
contributions.
First of all, they would have to show a certain noble reservedness
and
not
be so eager to mix socially-of which others want little or nothing.
On
the
other hand, anti-Semitism in Germany also has consequences that, from
a
Jewish point of view, should be welcomed. I believe German Jewry owes
its
continued existence to anti-Semitism."-Albert Einstein, A. Engel
translator,
"How I became a Zionist", The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein,
Volume 7,
Document 57, Princeton University Press, (2002), pp. 234-235, at 235.
"Anti-Semitism will be a psychological phenomenon as long as Jews
come
in
contact with non-Jews-what harm can there be in that? Perhaps it is
due to
anti-Semitism that we survive as a race: at least that is what I
believe."-Albert Einstein, English translation by A. Engel, The
Collected
Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 7, Document 37, Princeton
University
Press, (2002), p. 159.


"What would you say, for example, if I did not deny there are good
aspects
of anti-Semitism? I say that anti-Semitism will educate the Jews. In
fifty
years, if we still have the same social order, it will have brought
forth a
fine and presentable generation of Jews, endowed with a delicate,
extremely
sensitive feeling for honor and the like."-Theodor Herzl, as quoted
by
Amos
Elon, Herzl, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, (1975), pp.
114-115.
________________________________________
"[T]here may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about
my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in the
U.
S.
control the entire information and propaganda machine, the large
newspapers,
the motion pictures, radio and television, and the big companies, and
there
is a force that we have to take into consideration."-Richard Milhous
Nixon,
Thirty-Seventh President of the United States of America, as quoted
by
Leonard Dinnerstein, Antisemitism in America, Oxford University
Press,
New
York, (1994), pp. 232-233. Dinnerstein cites: "Clipping of Fikri
Abbaza,
interview with Richard Nixon, Al-Mussawar, July 12, 1974, folder
'Jewish
Matters, 1969-1974,' box 5, Leonard Garment mss., LC."
________________________________________
"Yet despite the lack of Jewish worship and observance, and my
family's
total assimilation into everything American and secular, we were
thoroughly
Jewish. Our perspective was Jewish, as was our very essence. The
world
was
split into two distinct halves: Jews and gentiles. Jews were always
sought
in business or social dealings over gentiles. A common expression
used
by
Jews to describe a slow, dense person was-and still is-'He's got a
goyisher
kop,' which literally means 'He's got a gentile head' but
figuratively
means
'slow-witted.' First question when I came home and boasted of making
a
new
friend always was 'Is he Jewish?' 'God forbid!' (my father's
expression) if
I should ever go out with a gentile girl, and 'Oy vey!' (which
literally
means 'Oh pain!') if I ever got serious with her. All my parents'
friends
were Jews. They all shared the same role models: Sandy Koufax,
Bernard
Baruch, Bess Meyerson, Sam Levinson, Hank Greenberg, Arthur Goldberg,
Golda
Meir, Albert Einstein-these were people to be admired. And that poet
with
the beard, Allen Ginsberg, so smart, but the faygeleh (homosexual)
business,
such a waste!"-S. G. Bloom, Postville: A Clash of Cultures in
Heartland
America, Harcourt, Inc., New York, (2000), pp. 63-64.
________________________________________
"Joseph's appointment in Egypt was good for the Jews. The Jews of
Persia
were saved thanks to Esther's influence with the king. When a very
powerful
emperor is elected by the majority of the people, we must cooperate
with
him[.]"-Vyacheslav Moshe Kantor, as quoted by Amiram Barkat, "Putin
ally is
frontrunner to head European Jewish Congress", HAARETZ.com,
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/873804.html, (21 June 2007).
"The [European Jewish Congress] has a very important role in the
struggle
against Iran. We are not Israel's ambassadors, but we can pressure
our
governments and explain the danger[.]"-President of the Austrian
Jewish
Community Ariel Muzicant, as quoted by Amiram Barkat, "Putin ally is
frontrunner to head European Jewish Congress", HAARETZ.com,
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/873804.html, (21 June 2007).
________________________________________
"Regarding a timeline ... we decided that the end of 2007 will be the
point
of assessing the effectiveness of the sanctions and the amount of
influence
they are having on the Iranians. [***] I never said there is no
military
option, and the military option is included in all the options that
are on
the table, but at this time it's right to use the path of sanctions,
and to
intensify them."-Transportation Minister of Israel Shaul Mofaz as
quoted by
"News Agencies", "Mofaz: All options, including military one, on the
table
regarding Iran", HAARETZ.com,
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/868786.html, (9 June 2007).
"I think we've got to be prepared to take aggressive military action
against
the Iranians to stop them from killing Americans in Iraq. And to me,
that
would include a strike into, over the border into Iran, where we have
good
evidence that they have a base at which they are training these
people
coming back into Iraq to kill our soldiers. [***] If they don't play
by the
rules, we've got to use our force, and to me that would include
taking
military action to stop them from doing what they're doing."-United
States
Senator Joseph Lieberman, in an interview with Bob Schieffer on Face
the
Nation on 10 June 2007, "Lieberman: Bomb Iran If It Doesn't Stop",
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/10/ftn/main2908476.shtml.
________________________________________
"It's been conclusively proven Iran is not going to be talked out of
its
nuclear programme. So to stop them from doing it, we have to
massively
increase the pressure. If we can't get enough other countries to come
along
with us to do that, then we've got to go with regime change by
bolstering
opposition groups and the like, because that's the circumstance most
likely
for an Iranian government to decide that it's safer not to pursue
nuclear
weapons than to continue to do so. And if all else fails, if the
choice is
between a nuclear-capable Iran and the use of force, then I think we
need to
look at the use of force. [***] If the choice is them continuing
[towards a
nuclear bomb] or the use of force, I think you're at a Hitler
marching
into
the Rhineland point. If you don't stop it then, the future is in his
hands,
not in your hands, just as the future decisions on their nuclear
programme
would be in Iran's hands, not ours."-Former United States Ambassador
to the
United Nations John Bolton, as quoted by Toby Harnden, "We must
attack
Iran
before it gets the bomb ", Telegraph.co.uk,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/16/wbolt...,
(17 May 2007).
________________________________________
"With two carrier strike groups in the Gulf, we're sending clear
messages to
friends and adversaries alike. We'll keep the sea lanes open. [. . .]
We'll
stand with others to prevent Iran from gaining nuclear weapons and
dominating this region[.]"-United States Vice President Dick Cheney,
as
quoted by Graham Bowley, "On Carrier in Gulf, Cheney Issues Warning
to
Iran", The New York Times www.nytimes.com,
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/11/world/middleeast/11cnd-cheney.html?hp,
(11
May 2007); and Tom Raum, "Cheney Warns Iran Sea Lanes Must Be Open",
The
Associated Press, www.washingtonpost.com,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/11/AR200...,
(11 May 2007).
________________________________________
"The American president will not abandon the military option and I
believe
that we do not want him to do so[.]"-United States Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice, as quoted by Reuters News Agency, "Bush won't give
up
military option on Iran: Rice", www.reuters.com,
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL086231320070508, (8 May
2007).
________________________________________
"Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. We all know that. Iran
continues
their efforts to build nuclear weapons. Iran is now exporting lethal
IED's
and jihadists and suicide bombers into Iraq killing American
soldiers.
The
Iranians encouraged Hezbullah to attack Israel from Lebanon recently.
Iran
poses one of the greatest threats to the world, to the security of
the
world, and in the Middle East. I believe the Iranians have got, we
have got
to bring greater pressures, diplomatic, economic, political, join
with
our
European allies. We still fear greatly the effect of a cut off of oil
on,
from, into Europe. We have to work together. If the Russians and the
Chinese
are not helpful to us, then we had better figure out a way to put
additional
pressures encouraging democracy and freedom within Iraq, which is a
very
cultured socie. . . within Iran, which is a very cultured society. At
the
end of the day, we cannot allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons.
[. . .] My
greatest fear is the Iranians acquire a nuclear weapon, and give it
to
a
terrorist organization, and there is a real threat of them doing
that.
The
trip wire [for a U. S. strike at Iran] is, that if they acquire these
weapons, and their, our intelligence tells us, that this is a real
threat to
the state of Israel, to other states in the region. But I want to
emphasize,
Chris, there's lots of additional efforts that can be made and must
be
made
before we consider that option. There's lots of things we can do.
That
is
the ultimately final option and I don't think we need to exercise it
at this
time."-U. S. Senator and Presidential candidate John McCain,
Republican
Presidential Candidate Debates,
http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?f=00&g=&p=hotvideo_m_debate_rep&t...
"If there is a threat to the existence of Israel, which is by the way
I
think a potential threat to the existence of the United States, then
you
have to come to that, the aid of Israel."-U. S. Congressman and
Presidential
candidate Tom Tancredo, Republican Presidential Candidate Debates,
http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?f=00&g=&p=hotvideo_m_debate_rep&t...
"It really depends on what our intelligence says. I mean the reality
is the
use of military force against Iran would be very dangerous. It would
be very
provocative. The only thing worse would be Iran being a nuclear
power."-U.
S. Presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani, Republican Presidential
Candidate
Debates,
http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?f=00&g=&p=hotvideo_m_debate_rep&t...
"Right now Iran is moving equipment into Iraq that is being used to
kill
Americans. Iran has crossed the line. The United States has absolute
license
at this point to take whatever actions are necessary to stop those
deadly
instruments from being moved across the line being used in
explosives,
roadside bombs inside Iraq. And, lastly, you know we should not get
to
the
edge of the cliff on this enrichment of uranium and plutonium to be
used for
a nuclear weapon in Iran. The United States needs to move very
quickly."-U.
S. Congressman and Presidential candidate Duncan Hunter, Republican
Presidential Candidate Debates,
http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?f=00&g=&p=hotvideo_m_debate_rep&t...
________________________________________
"If we do have to take offensive military action against Iran, it
would be
far better if the rest of the world saw it as a position of last
resort, not
first resort, because the effect and consequences will be global."-
United
States Senator, and Presidential Candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton,
as
quoted by Hilary Leila Krieger, "Clinton: US might have to confront
Iran",
The Jerusalem Post, www.jpost.com,
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1177514487245&pagename=JPo...,
(26 April 2007).
________________________________________
"If it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for
this war
with Iraq, we would not be doing this[.] The leaders of the Jewish
community
are influential enough that they could change the direction of where
this is
going, and I think they should."-Congressman Jim Moran, as quoted by
Ted
Barrett, "Lawmaker under fire for saying Jews support Iraq war: Moran
apologizes; White House blasts comments", www.CNN.com,
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/03/11/moran.jews/, (12 March
2003).
________________________________________
"Another diplomatic source said that the resolution was partly a
result of
Israel's activity around the world."-Ronny Sofer, "J'lem sources
pleased
with UN resolution increasing", Ynetnews www.ynetnews.com,
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3380541,00.html, (24 March
2007).
________________________________________
"'I believe that ultimately the only real prospect of getting Iran to
give
up nuclear weapons is to change the regime,' Bolton told reporters
after an
off-the-record speech to the Hudson Institute, a nonpartisan policy
research
organization. How should this be done? 'By the force of the Iranian
people
themselves,' Bolton replied. 'But if the alternative is a nuclear
Iran, as
unpleasant as the use of military force would be, I think the
prospect
of a
nuclear Iran is worse.'"-Edith M. Lederer, Associated Press Writer,
quoting
former US Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, "Bolton: Iran Won't Give
Up
Nuke Ambition", Associated Press, Guardian Unlimited www.guardian.co.uk,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6496892,00.html, (21
March
2007).
________________________________________
"Former ambassador to the UN John Bolton told the BBC that before any
ceasefire Washington wanted Israel to eliminate Hezbollah's military
capability."-"Bolton admits Lebanon truce block", BBC NEWS,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6479377.stm, (22 March 2007).
________________________________________
"Chirac asked that Israel act to topple the Assad regime, and
promised
in
return to block any moves against Israel within the United Nations or
European Union."-Ezra HaLevi, "France Urged Israel to Invade Syria
During
War", Arutz Sheva www.IsraelNationalNews.com,
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/121878, (19 March
2007).
"I know this will annoy many of your readers. . . But the anger is
over the
fact that Israel did not fight against the Syrians. Instead of Israel
fighting against Hizbullah, many parts of the American administration
believe that Israel should have fought against the real enemy, which
is
Syria and not Hizbullah."-Meyrav Wurmser, as quoted by Yitzhak
Benhorin in,
"Neocons: We expected Israel to attack Syria",
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3340750,00.html, (16
December
2006).
________________________________________
"Officials said Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other members of the
leadership had
decided to strip from a major military spending bill a requirement
for
Bush
to gain approval from Congress before moving against Iran.
Conservative
Democrats as well as lawmakers concerned about the possible impact on
Israel
had argued for the change in strategy."- David Espo and Matthew Lee,
Associated Press Writers, "Dems abandon war authority provision",
Associated
Press, YAHOO! NEWS http://news.yahoo.com,
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070313/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iraq;_ylt=A0WTc...,
(13 March 2007).
________________________________________
"Israeli Knesset member Effie Eitam has a reputation as a hawk, but
on
the
question of Iran and its nuclear program, he believes he speaks for
the
country's mainstream strategic thinkers. Diplomatic and political
manoeuvres
to rein in the Islamic state are feckless and doomed to fail, leaving
Israel, with or without the co-operation of the United States, no
alternative but to use military force to put an end to the nuclear
threat,
he says. 'Israel is preparing and will definitely take action,' Eitam
predicted. [***] Eitam told The CJN that Israel may have to act alone
against Iran within 'a window' to two to three years, but he
suggested
Israel would move before Bush leaves Office."-Paul Lungen, "Israeli
MK
predicts attack on Iran", The Canadian Jewish News www.cjnews.com,
http://www.cjnews.com/viewarticle.asp?id=11329, (8 March 2007).
________________________________________
"The Israeli Regime while remaining outside the relevant
international
instruments continues quantitative and qualitative development of its
nuclear weapons, without any concern, international pressure or
monitoring.
Those who are pushing Security Council to take punitive measures
against the
peaceful nuclear program of the Islamic Republic of Iran, continue to
hinder
any action by the Security Council against Israeli regime to force it
to
abide by the NPT regime. Doing so, they have given wide latitude to
this
regime and even encourage it to develop freely the clandestine and
prohibited possession of nuclear weapons. [***] While Iran has been
providing the Agency with access to all its nuclear material and
facilities
pursuant to its NPT Safeguards Agreement and the Agency is able to
verify
the non-diversion of declared nuclear material in Iran (as reflected
in
paragraphs 26-27 of the report), few countries have been making daily
threat
of resort to attack Iranian fully safeguarded peaceful nuclear
facilities
uttered at their highest levels, in clear violation of Article 2 (4)
of the
UN Charter. The Islamic republic of Iran has already documented these
unlawful and dangerous threats by sending official letters to the UN
Secretary General and the Director General of the IAEA. And while
overwhelming majority of the international community has been calling
for a
peaceful negotiated solution and Iran has announced its readiness for
such a
solution, the United States and Israel which both have a high record
of
vertical and horizontal proliferation activities are continuing to
make
threats against Iran's full-scope safeguarded facilities."-Ali Asqar
Soltanieh, Permanent Representative to the International Atomic
Energy
Agency Board of Governors from Iran, in an address to the IAEA Board
of
Governors on 7 March 2007, "Full Text of Speech Delivered by Iran's
Envoy to
IAEA", Fars News Agency www.farsnews.com,
http://www.farsnews.com/English/newstext.php?nn=8512160500, (7 March
2007).
"All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the
threat
or use of force against the territorial integrity or political
independence
of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes
of
the
United Nations."-Charter of the United Nations, Chapter 1, Article 2,
Paragraph 4.
________________________________________
"I believe that either regime change in Iran or, as a last resort,
military
action is the only thing that will stop the Iranians from getting
nuclear
weapons[.]"-John Bolton, Former American Envoy to the United Nations,
as
quoted by Janine Zacharia and Bill Varner, "Bolton Says U.S. Should
Seek
'Regime Change' in Iran", Bloomberg.com www.bloomberg.com,
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a.m.58sr9RqM&refe...,
(1 March 2007).
________________________________________
"Ahmadinejad is the pusher of all the Muslim world toward fanaticism
and
extremism. In his case, he should be made to disappear from the
arena.
He
has said he wants to become a shahid, a martyr, so I think he should
get his
wish and be sent to heaven[.]"-Meir Amit, Former Director of Mossad,
as
quoted by Aaron Klein, "Former Mossad chief: Assassinate Ahmadinejad.
Iranian president 'says he wants to die a martyr so he should be sent
to
heaven'", WorldNetDaily www.wnd.com,
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54244, (14 February
2007).
"It is time for Israel or the US to bomb Iran now. Not next week,
next
month, or next summer, but now. As quickly and as hard and as
painfully as
possible. [***] So like it or not, time is of the essence, and there
is not
a moment to lose. The US or Israel should bomb Iran now, before it
proves
too late."-Michael Freund, "Right on!: Stop the atomic ayatollahs",
The
Jerusalem Post www.jpost.com,
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1170359851111&pagename=JPo...,
(13 February 2007).
"'The only chance to convince Iran to dismantle without using brute
force is
if you choose a big enough stick and you wave it wildly enough,'
Steinitz
told The Jerusalem Post. The Likud MK added that the goal was to
'wave, in
order to not to use it.'
'At this moment, Iran thinks that Israel is weak politically, so it
would be
better if the United States were to issue the threats,' said
Steinitz.
'There is one leader of the world and it is not miniscule Israel.
Iran
is a
global threat they are developing a nuclear project to become not
just
a
regional player but a global Player.'"-Sheera Claire Frenkel quoting
Knesset
Member Yuval Steinitz, "Steinitz: US must stop Iran from arming", The
Jerusalem Post www.jpost.com,
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1170359851884&pagename=JPo...,
(14 February 2007).
Did Tzipi Livni, Foreign Affairs Minister and Vice Prime Minister of
Israel,
call for the elimination of the nation of Iran?
"The global Holocaust denial led by Iran is a political move meant to
de-legitimize Israel, and it is unacceptable that a country that
denies the
Holocaust is accepted by the world as part of the international
community[.]"-Tzipi Livni, Foreign Affairs Minister and Vice Prime
Minister
of Israel, as quoted in Lilach Shoval, "Anti-Semitism very much
alive,
says
Livni", www.ynetnews.com,
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3363734,00.html, (11
February
2007).
"ISRAEL has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran's uranium
enrichment
facilities with tactical nuclear weapons.
Two Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian
facility
using low-yield nuclear 'bunker-busters', according to several
Israeli
military sources."-Uzi Mahnaimi and Sarah Baxter, "Revealed: Israel
plans
nuclear strike on Iran", The Sunday Times www.timesonline.co.uk, (7
January
2007).
"SPIEGEL: You said recently that Israel might have to stand alone and
therefore must be ready to deal unilaterally with the Iran problem.
Lieberman: That is the worst-case scenario. The differences in
opinion
between Russia and Western Europe, between Europe and the U.S.,
between the
U.S. and the United Nations have destabilized the global political
system.
We have to take into account that the international community may not
do
anything and that Israel may have to act alone."-"SPIEGEL INTERVIEW
WITH
AVIGDOR LIEBERMAN" conducted by Christian Neef and Christoph Schult,
quoting
Avigdor Lieberman, Minister of Strategic Affairs and Deputy Prime
Minister
of Israel, Der Spiegel, SPIEGEL ONLINE, www.spiegel.de,
http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,465769,00.html,
(12
February 2007).
"We must turn to Hillary Clinton and other potential presidential
candidates
in the Democratic Party so that they publicly support immediate
action
by
Bush against Iran. We should also approach European countries so that
they
support American actions in Iran, so that Bush will not be isolated
in
the
international arena again. We must clandestinely cooperate with Saudi
Arabia
so that it also persuades the US to strike Iran."-Brigadier General
(Res.)
Oded Tira, Former IDF Chief Artillery Officer, "What to do with
Iran?",
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3346275,00.html, (30
December
2006).
"'Once you say that Iran is like Nazi Germany and that it is willing
to use
its nuclear weapons to destroy Israel regardless of the destruction
it
would
bring to their own country, you are really arguing that there is no
alternative but for Israel and the United States to attack first,'
said M.J.
Rosenberg, director of policy analysis for the Israel Policy Forum."-
James
D. Besser, "Leading Hawk Warns Of Hysteria Over Iran: Suggestion that
war is
only option misguided, JINSA official says", The Jewish Week
www.thejewishweek.com,
http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=13644, (9
February
2007).
"We must cry Gevalt before the entire world[. . . .] In 1938, Hitler
didn't
say he wanted to destroy [the Jews]; Ahmadinejad is saying clearly
that this
is his intention, and we aren't even shouting. At least call it a
crime
against humanity. We must make the world see that the issue here is a
program for genocide."- Likud chair MK Benjamin Netanyahu, Ninth
Prime
Minister of Israel, as quoted in Mazal Mualem, "Netanyahu wants Iran
president tried for genocide", www.haaretz.com,
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/800838.html, (15 December 2006).
"The Jews of North African origin are strongly attached to Israel,
don't
hide their ethnic affiliation and don't fear a charge of 'dual
loyalty' to
both France and Israel. The young generation doesn't bow to the old
French
Jewish model of being French first and Jewish later, and aren't
embarrassed
about showing a 'communitarian' preference for a particular political
candidate."-JTA, "French Jews Favor Conservative", The Jewish Week,
www.thejewishweek.com,
http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=13926, (20
April
2007).
"Active Canadian Jews, I have observed, live with a completely
different
dynamic. They're proud of their Canadian citizenship, but don't have
a
deep
sense of Canadian national identity. Their national identity is
ebulliently
Jewish, belonging to the Jewish nation."-Gary Wexler, "US Jews can
learn
from the Canadian community", The Jerusalem Post www.jpost.com,
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173879238105&pagename=JPo...,
(3 April 2007).
"SUBSIDIZING THE REFUGEE CAMPS
Senator GORE. Mr. Secretary, I realize that we do not have power, as
Senator
Symington has punctuated, to give instructions and directions there.
There is one problem, it seems to me, about which we can have a say,
and
that is continued subsidization of this refugee camp. I went there
ten
years
ago and found it an impossible situation in which they have continued
all
the while to feed and clothe, support those people, and there are
some
200,000 more than when they went into the camp. So surely we can have
something to say about no longer continuing to subsidize this.
Secretary RUSK. Well, that constitutes some pressure on the Arabs. It
does
not constitute any pressure on Israel.
Senator GORE. Well, Israel has taken over some of them, in the Gaza
Strip
and also in Jordan. They are now claiming sovereignty. So it seems to
me it
might be a pressure on both.
Secretary RUSK. Well, I do think that the refugee matter should be
raised
and looked at wholly anew in connection with a settlement of this
present
situation.
Senator GORE. The point I am trying to make is this is one subject on
which
we can have a say, and that is how long we are going to continue to
pay a
very heavy cost of these refugees if they are not dispersed into the
countryside.
Secretary RUSK. Well, I do not want to underestimate influence in
this
situation, but I just want to point out that it is not necessarily
decisive
when you are talking with countries about what they consider the life
and
death issues for them.
TAX EXEMPTIONS FOR DONATIONS TO ISRAEL
Senator HICKENLOOPER. Do we not give tax forgiveness for moneys
contributed
to Israel, which is rather unusual? We could stop that.
Secretary RUSK. I believe contributions to the UJA are tax exempt,
yes.
The CHAIRMAN. That is right.
The only country. Do you think you have the votes in the Senate to
revoke
that?
Senator CASE. Are you in favor yourself?
Senator HICKENLOOPER. I think we ought to treat all nations alike.
Senator CASE. That is correct. But are you in favor of it?
Senator HICKENLOOPER. As long as we do not give it to other nations,
I
do
not--
The CHAIRMAN. The trouble is they think they have control of the
Senate and
they can do as they please.
Senator SYMINGTON. What was that?
The CHAIRMAN. I said they know they have control of the Senate
politically,
and therefore whatever the Secretary tells them, they can laugh at
him. They
say, 'Yes, but you don't control the Senate.''
Senator SYMINGTON. They were very anxious to get every Senator they
could to
come out and say we ought to act unilaterally, and they got two,
three.
The CHAIRMAN. They know when the chips are down you can no more
reverse this
tax exemption than you can fly. You could not pass a bill through the
Senate.
Senator HICKENLOOPER. I do not think you could.
The CHAIRMAN. Changing that tax exemption contribution to the UJA. I
would
bet you ten to one you could not begin to pass a bill You do not
believe
they could under any circumstances.
Senator SYMINGTON. A bill to do what?
The CHAIRMAN. To revoke the tax exemption of gifts to the UJA. That
is
one
of their major sources of income. You yourself have pointed out the
money
they paid for the French arms they got from the U.S.
Senator SYMINGTON. Each year the money we give annually for this is
less
than 1 percent of the cost of Vietnam.
The CHAIRMAN. I agree with that.
Senator HICKENLOOPER. There you go.
U.S. CONTRIBUTIONS PAY THE ISRAELI ARMS
The CHAIRMAN. But you know very well, you said yourself, that the
arms
they
buy from France are largely paid for by contributions that come from
this
country.
Senator SYMINGTON. Because we would not sell it to them, so instead
of
selling them the arms--
Senator GORE. Has the President recommended that this be repealed?
The CHAIRMAN. No, he has not. I do not wish to make the point except
the
Secretary is quite correct when he says his leverage on Israel is
very
limited because of the political situation.
Senator HICKENLOOPER. I am sorry I brought it up.
Secretary RUSK. I did not say it.
The CHAIRMAN. If you did not say it, you do not disagree with it
anyway.
Secretary RUSK. I think it should be pointed out though on this tax
exempt
matter that there are many other organizations, institutions, that
would
fall into the same principle, private foundations in their
expenditures
abroad, churches, the voluntary agencies; there are very large sums
of
money
going to foreign countries that are tax exempt in this country as the
origin.
Senator HICKENLOOPER. I do not think it is analogous.
Senator GORE. It is tax deductible; you said tax exempt.
Secretary RUSK. Except the organizations are exempt. Contributions to
them
are tax deductible.
Senator COOPER. I suggest-it is possible after this that Israel may
ask that
this be removed as a sign of showing they are not absolutely
dependent
on
the U.S."-"BRIEFING ON THE MIDDLE EAST SITUATION, Friday, June 9,
1967, U.S.
SENATE, COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, Washington, DC.", Executive
Sessions
of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Together with Joint
Sessions
with
the Senate Armed Services Committee (Historical Series), Volume XIX,
Ninetieth Congress, First Session, U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, D. C., (1967/2006), pp. 705-728, at 710-712.
________________________________________
"History has shown that progress is possible only if the United
States
of
America assumes its historic role as honest broker between Israel and
Palestine[.] We cannot be peacemakers if American government leaders
are
seen as knee-jerk supporters of every action or policy of whatever
Israeli
government happens to be in power at the time."-Jimmy Carter, Thirty-
Ninth
President of the United States of America, as quoted by Paul Kita,
"Awards
Ceremony Offers Carter Prize, Platform for His Opinions", info Zine
www.infozine.com,
http://www.infozine.com/news/stories/op/storiesView/sid/22062/, (6
April
2007).
"The American friends of Israel who demand such subservience are in
many
cases sincere and well-intentioned people. I know them. But on this
crucial
issue, they are tragically mistaken. Their demands subvert America's
ability
to bring to Israel what she most desperately needs and wants -- peace
and
security within recognized borders."-Jimmy Carter, Thirty-Ninth
President of
the United States of America, as quoted in, "US cannot be Mideast
peacemaker
as "knee-jerk" supporter of all Israeli", Kuwait News Agency (KUNA)
www.kuna.net.kw,
http://www.kuna.net.kw/NewsAgenciesPublicSite/ArticleDetails.aspx?id=...,
(4 April 2007).
________________________________________
"It's almost politically suicidal in the United States for a member
of
the
Congress who wants to seek reelection to take any stand that might be
interpreted as anti-policy of the conservative Israeli government,
which is
equated, as I've seen it myself, as anti-Semitism."-Jimmy Carter,
Thirty-Ninth President of the United States of America, in an
interview on,
"This week with George Stephanopoulos," ABC, as quoted by Yitzhak
Benhorin,
"Balanced stand on ME is political suicide, says Carter", www.ynetnews.com,
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3369679,00.html, (26
February
2007).
________________________________________
"The Islamic Republic of Iran seeks good neighborly relations with
all
the
surrounding states, and it desires establishment of sustainable
peace,
friendship and tranquility in the region, particularly in the Persian
Gulf."-Iranian Defense Minister Brigadier General Mostafa Mohammad
Najjar,
as quoted in "Iran Seeks Peace, Stability in Persian Gulf", Fars News
Agency
www.farsnews.ir, http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8511220267,
(11
February 2007).
"That Iran is willing to threaten Israel is wrong[. . . .] We pose no
threat
and if we are conducting nuclear research and development we are no
threat
to Israel. We have no intention of aggression against any country.
[. . .]
Today we announce to you that the political will of Iran is aimed at
the
negotiated settlement of the case and we don't want to aggravate the
situation in our region[. . . .] We know that this issue can be
settled in a
constructive dialogue and we welcome that."-Ali Larijani, Iranian
Secretary
of the Supreme National Security Council and Chief Iranian Nuclear
Negotiator, as quoted in Associated Press, "Iran negotiator: Nuclear
program
'no threat to Israel'",
http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/02/11/iran.israel.ap/, (11
February
2007).
"Repeatedly and frankly we have announced that in Iran's national
security
doctrine there is no room for atomic and chemical weapons as we
consider
them against Islamic laws. Iran's Supreme Leader (Ayatollah Seyyed
Ali
Khamenei) in this connection had issued a decree that mass
destruction
weapons are prohibited by the Muslim religion. [. . .] Therefore we
support
the idea of a Middle East free from weapons of mass destruction[.]"-
Ali
Larijani, Iranian Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council
and
Chief Iranian Nuclear Negotiator, as quoted in "'No room for WMDs in
Iran's
national security doctrine,' says Larijani", Islamic Republic News
Agency,
http://www2.irna.com/en/news/view/line-203/0702111128162815.htm, (11
February 2007).
"We are committed not to launch aggression on any country and defend
ourselves in the face of any aggression."-Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,
President of
Iran, as quoted in "IR calls for promotion of peace", Islamic
Republic
of
Iran Broadcasting www.iribnews.ir,
http://www.iribnews.ir/Full_en.asp?news_id=231222&n=22, (11 February
2007).
________________________________________
"We are witnessing an almost uncontained hyper use of force in
international
relations . . . the United States has overstepped its national
borders
in
every way[. . . .] The legitimate use of force can only be done by
the
United Nations, which cannot be replaced by EU or NATO[. . . .] The
unilateral illegal action has not resolved any problem. [. . .] [N]
obody
feels secure anymore[. . . .] We should not corner Iran into a
hostile
environment[.]"-Vladimir Putin, Second President of the Russian
Federation,
as quoted in Mu Xuequan, Editor, "Russia differences with West
obvious
at
Munich conference", China View www.chinaview.cn,
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-02/10/content_5724866.htm, (10
February 2007).
________________________________________
"1 Why are the nations in an uproar? And why do the peoples mutter in
vain?
2 The kings of the earth stand up, and the rulers take counsel
together,
against the LORD, and against His anointed: 3 'Let us break their
bands
asunder, and cast away their cords from us.' 4 He that sitteth in
heaven
laugheth, the Lord hath them in derision. 5 Then will He speak unto
them in
His wrath, and affright them in His sore displeasure: 6 'Truly it is
I
that
have established My king upon Zion, My holy mountain.' 7 I will tell
of the
decree: the LORD said unto me: 'Thou art My son, this day have I
begotten
thee. 8 Ask of Me, and I will give the nations for thine inheritance,
and
the ends of the earth for thy possession. 9 Thou shalt break them
with
a rod
of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.' 10
Now
therefore, O ye kings, be wise; be admonished, ye judges of the
earth.
11
Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. 12 Do homage in
purity, lest He be angry, and ye perish in the way, when suddenly His
wrath
is kindled. Happy are all they that take refuge in Him."-The Jewish
book of
Psalm 2 [version of the Jewish Publication Society]"
________________________________________
Charter of the United Nations
Chapter 1, Article 1, Paragraphs 1 & 2:
"1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to
take
effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of
threats to
the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other
breaches
of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity
with
the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or
settlement of
international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of
the
peace;
2. To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for
the
principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to
take
other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;"
Chapter 1, Article 2, Paragraph 4:
"All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the
threat
or use of force against the territorial integrity or political
independence
of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes
of
the
United Nations."
Chapter 6, Article 33, Paragraphs 1 & 2:
"1. The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to
endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall,
first
of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation,
conciliation,
arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or
arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice.
2. The Security Council shall, when it deems necessary, call upon the
parties to settle their dispute by such means."
The North Atlantic Treaty
"The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United
Nations,
to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by
peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security
and
justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international
relations
from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the
purposes
of the United Nations."
Principles of the Nuremberg Tribunal, 1950
"Principle Vl
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under;
international
law:
a. Crimes against peace:
i. Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression
or a
war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
ii.Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the
accomplishment
of
any of the acts mentioned under (I)."
"To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an
international
crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from
other
war
crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the
whole."-Robert H. Jackson at the Nuremberg Tribunal, quoted in Curtis
Doebbler, "A Farce of Law: The Trial of Saddam Hussein", Jurist:
Legal
News
& Research,
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/04/farce-of-law-trial-of-sadda...,
(24 April 2006).
________________________________________
"More than a decade after Saddam Hussein agreed to give up weapons of
mass
destruction, Iraq has stepped up its quest for nuclear weapons and
has
embarked on a worldwide hunt for materials to make an atomic bomb,
Bush
administration officials said today. [***] Hard-liners are alarmed
that
American intelligence underestimated the pace and scale of Iraq's
nuclear
program before Baghdad's defeat in the gulf war. Conscious of this
lapse in
the past, they argue that Washington dare not wait until analysts
have
found
hard evidence that Mr. Hussein has acquired a nuclear weapon. The
first sign
of a 'smoking gun,' they argue, may be a mushroom Cloud."-Michael R.
Gordon
and Judith Miller, "Threats and Responses: The Iraqis; U.S. Says
Hussein
Intensifies Quest for A-Bomb Parts", The New York Times, (8 September
2002 /
Late Edition - Final), p. 1.
________________________________________
"It is forbidden to be merciful to them. You must send missiles to
them and
annihilate them. They are evil and damnable[.] [***] The Lord shall
return
the Arabs' deeds on their own heads, waste their seed and exterminate
them,
devastate them and vanish them from this world[.]"-Rabbi Ovadia
Yosef,
as
quoted in BBC News, "Rabbi calls for annihilation of Arabs",
www.news.bbc.co.uk,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1270038.stm, (10 April
2001).
"And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt
smite
them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with
them,
nor
shew mercy unto them:"-The Jewish book of Deuteronomy 7:2.
________________________________________
"'U.S. policy must be clear and unequivocal: We cannot, we should
not,
we
must not permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons,' the
Democrat told
a crowd of Israel supporters. 'In dealing with this threat ... no
option can
be taken off the table.' Clinton spoke at a Manhattan dinner held by
the
largest pro-Israel lobbying group in the U.S., the American Israel
Public
Affairs Committee."-The Associated Press, quoting United States
Senator
Hillary Clinton, "Sen. Clinton: We must not permit Iran to acquire
nuclear
weapons", www.haaretz.com,http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/821284.html,
(2 February 2007).
________________________________________
"With American-Iranian tensions mounting, Democratic presidential
contenders
are facing a daunting political challenge: how to speak out against
Tehran's
pursuit of nuclear weapons in a way that appeals to pro-Israel
supporters
without alienating the party's overwhelmingly anti-war rank and
file."-Jennifer Siegel, "Crisis Over Iran Poses Political Headaches
For
Democratic Presidential Hopefuls", The Jewish Daily Forward,
http://www.forward.com/articles/crisis-over-iran-poses-political-head...,
(2 February 2007).
"While Jewish communal leaders focus most of their current lobbying
efforts
on pressing the United States to take a tough line against Iran and
its
nuclear program, some are privately voicing fears that they will be
accused
of driving America into a war with the regime in Tehran."-Forward
Staff,
"Groups Fear Public Backlash Over Iran", The Jewish Daily Forward,
http://www.forward.com/articles/groups-fear-public-backlash-over-iran/,
(2
February 2007).
________________________________________
"If Iran escalates its military action in Iraq to the detriment of
our
troops and/or innocent Iraqi people, we will respond firmly. We - it
makes
common sense for the commander-in-chief to say to our troops and the
Iraqi
people and the Iraqi government that we will help you defend yourself
from
people that want to sow discord and harm. And so we will do what it
takes to
protect our troops.
One of the things that is very important in discussing Iran is not to
mix
issues. Our relationship with Iran is based upon a lot of different
issues.
One is what is happening in Iraq. Another is their ambitions to have
a
nuclear weapon. And we're dealing with this issue diplomatically, and
I
think this can be solved diplomatically. And the message that we are
working
to send to the Iranian regime and the Iranian people is that you will
become
increasingly isolated if you continue to pursue a nuclear weapon.
The message to the Iranian people is that your government is going to
cause
you deprivation. In other words, you've got a chance to really
flourish
again as a great tradition. However, if your government continues to
insist
upon a nuclear weapon, there will be lost opportunity for the Iranian
people. They won't be able to realize their full potential.
The Iranian people have got to know that this government and the
United
States bears no hostility to them. We're just deeply concerned about
a
government that is insisting upon having a nuclear weapon, and at the
same
time, rewriting history - the history of the past, and regards, for
example,
the Holocaust. It troubles a lot of people in this world, and I'll
continue
to work with, you know, friends and allies to send a clear message."-
George
W. Bush, Forty-Third President of the United State of America, "Full
Transcript: NPR Interview with President Bush", www.npr.org,
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7065633, (29
January
2007).
________________________________________
"Twelve years ago, Saddam Hussein faced the prospect of being the
last
casualty in a war he had started and lost. To spare himself, he
agreed
to
disarm of all weapons of mass destruction. For the next 12 years, he
systematically violated that agreement. He pursued chemical,
biological, and
nuclear weapons, even while inspectors were in his country. Nothing
to
date
has restrained him from his pursuit of these weapons - not economic
sanctions, not isolation from the civilized world, not even cruise
missile
strikes on his military facilities.
Almost three months ago, the United Nations Security Council gave
Saddam
Hussein his final chance to disarm. He has shown instead utter
contempt for
the United Nations, and for the opinion of the world. The 108 U.N.
inspectors were sent to conduct - were not sent to conduct a
scavenger
hunt
for hidden materials across a country the size of California. The job
of the
inspectors is to verify that Iraq's regime is disarming. It is up to
Iraq to
show exactly where it is hiding its banned weapons, lay those weapons
out
for the world to see, and destroy them as directed. Nothing like this
has
happened.
The United Nations concluded in 1999 that Saddam Hussein had
biological
weapons sufficient to produce over 25,000 liters of anthrax - enough
doses
to kill several million people. He hasn't accounted for that
material.
He's
given no evidence that he has destroyed it.
The United Nations concluded that Saddam Hussein had materials
sufficient to
produce more than 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin - enough to
subject
millions of people to death by respiratory failure. He hadn't
accounted for
that material. He's given no evidence that he has destroyed it.
Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the
materials to
produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent. In
such
quantities, these chemical agents could also kill untold thousands.
He's not
accounted for these materials. He has given no evidence that he has
destroyed them.
U.S. intelligence indicates that Saddam Hussein had upwards of 30,000
munitions capable of delivering chemical agents. Inspectors recently
turned
up 16 of them - despite Iraq's recent declaration denying their
existence.
Saddam Hussein has not accounted for the remaining 29,984 of these
prohibited munitions. He's given no evidence that he has destroyed
them.
From three Iraqi defectors we know that Iraq, in the late 1990s, had
several
mobile biological weapons labs. These are designed to produce germ
warfare
agents, and can be moved from place to a place to evade inspectors.
Saddam
Hussein has not disclosed these facilities. He's given no evidence
that he
has destroyed them.
The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in the 1990s that
Saddam
Hussein had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, had a
design
for a nuclear weapon and was working on five different methods of
enriching
uranium for a bomb. The British government has learned that Saddam
Hussein
recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our
intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-
strength
aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production. Saddam
Hussein
has
not credibly explained these activities. He clearly has much to hide.
The dictator of Iraq is not disarming. To the contrary; he is
deceiving.
From intelligence sources we know, for instance, that thousands of
Iraqi
security personnel are at work hiding documents and materials from
the
U.N.
inspectors, sanitizing inspection sites and monitoring the inspectors
themselves. Iraqi officials accompany the inspectors in order to
intimidate
witnesses.
Iraq is blocking U-2 surveillance flights requested by the United
Nations.
Iraqi intelligence officers are posing as the scientists inspectors
are
supposed to interview. Real scientists have been coached by Iraqi
officials
on what to say. Intelligence sources indicate that Saddam Hussein has
ordered that scientists who cooperate with U.N. inspectors in
disarming Iraq
will be killed, along with their families.
Year after year, Saddam Hussein has gone to elaborate lengths, spent
enormous sums, taken great risks to build and keep weapons of mass
destruction. But why? The only possible explanation, the only
possible
use
he could have for those weapons, is to dominate, intimidate, or
attack.
With nuclear arms or a full arsenal of chemical and biological
weapons,
Saddam Hussein could resume his ambitions of conquest in the Middle
East and
create deadly havoc in that region. And this Congress and the America
people
must recognize another threat. Evidence from intelligence sources,
secret
communications, and statements by people now in custody reveal that
Saddam
Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of al Qaeda.
Secretly, and without fingerprints, he could provide one of his
hidden
weapons to terrorists, or help them develop their own.
Before September the 11th, many in the world believed that Saddam
Hussein
could be contained. But chemical agents, lethal viruses and shadowy
terrorist networks are not easily contained. Imagine those 19
hijackers with
other weapons and other plans - this time armed by Saddam Hussein. It
would
take one vial, one canister, one crate slipped into this country to
bring a
day of horror like none we have ever known. We will do everything in
our
power to make sure that that day never comes. (Applause.)
Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since
when have
terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting
us
on
notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and
suddenly
emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too
late.
Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a
strategy,
and it is not an option. (Applause.)
The dictator who is assembling the world's most dangerous weapons has
already used them on whole villages - leaving thousands of his own
citizens
dead, blind, or disfigured. Iraqi refugees tell us how forced
confessions
are obtained - by torturing children while their parents are made to
watch.
International human rights groups have catalogued other methods used
in the
torture chambers of Iraq: electric shock, burning with hot irons,
dripping
acid on the skin, mutilation with electric drills, cutting out
tongues, and
rape. If this is not evil, then evil has no meaning. (Applause.)
And tonight I have a message for the brave and oppressed people of
Iraq:
Your enemy is not surrounding your country - your enemy is ruling
your
country. (Applause.) And the day he and his regime are removed from
power
will be the day of your liberation. (Applause.)
The world has waited 12 years for Iraq to disarm. America will not
accept a
serious and mounting threat to our country, and our friends and our
allies.
The United States will ask the U.N. Security Council to convene on
February
the 5th to consider the facts of Iraq's ongoing defiance of the
world.
Secretary of State Powell will present information and intelligence
about
Iraqi's legal - Iraq's illegal weapons programs, its attempt to hide
those
weapons from inspectors, and its links to terrorist groups.
We will consult. But let there be no misunderstanding: If Saddam
Hussein
does not fully disarm, for the safety of our people and for the peace
of the
world, we will lead a coalition to disarm him. (Applause.)
Tonight I have a message for the men and women who will keep the
peace,
members of the American Armed Forces: Many of you are assembling in
or
near
the Middle East, and some crucial hours may lay ahead. In those
hours,
the
success of our cause will depend on you. Your training has prepared
you.
Your honor will guide you. You believe in America, and America
believes in
you. (Applause.)
Sending Americans into battle is the most profound decision a
President can
make. The technologies of war have changed; the risks and suffering
of
war
have not. For the brave Americans who bear the risk, no victory is
free from
sorrow. This nation fights reluctantly, because we know the cost and
we
dread the days of mourning that always come.
We seek peace. We strive for peace. And sometimes peace must be
defended. A
future lived at the mercy of terrible threats is no peace at all. If
war is
forced upon us, we will fight in a just cause and by just means -
sparing,
in every way we can, the innocent. And if war is forced upon us, we
will
fight with the full force and might of the United States military -
and we
will prevail. (Applause.)
And as we and our coalition partners are doing in Afghanistan, we
will
bring
to the Iraqi people food and medicines and supplies - and freedom.
(Applause.)
Many challenges, abroad and at home, have arrived in a single season.
In two
years, America has gone from a sense of invulnerability to an
awareness of
peril; from bitter division in small matters to calm unity in great
causes.
And we go forward with confidence, because this call of history has
come to
the right country.
Americans are a resolute people who have risen to every test of our
time.
Adversity has revealed the character of our country, to the world and
to
ourselves. America is a strong nation, and honorable in the use of
our
strength. We exercise power without conquest, and we sacrifice for
the
liberty of strangers.
Americans are a free people, who know that freedom is the right of
every
person and the future of every nation. The liberty we prize is not
America's
gift to the world, it is God's gift to humanity. (Applause.)
We Americans have faith in ourselves, but not in ourselves alone. We
do not
know - we do not claim to know all the ways of Providence, yet we can
trust
in them, placing our confidence in the loving God behind all of life,
and
all of history.
May He guide us now. And may God continue to bless the United States
of
America. (Applause.)"-George W. Bush, Forty-Third President of the
United
State of America, "State of the Union Address", (28 January 2003).
________________________________________
"'The State of Israel will not allow the world to avoid a
confrontation with
a country calling for the destruction of Israel,' Prime Minister Ehud
Olmert
said Sunday during the weekly cabinet meeting. [***] 'Anti-Semintism
is the
gentiles' problem, not the Jews', it is the gentiles' disease, not
ours. As
long as there is anti-Semitism in the world, the world will be sick,'
Vice
Premier Shimon Peres said."-Ynetnews, www.ynetnews.com, "World can't
avoid
confrontation with Iran, PM says",
http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/10486.htm, (28 January
2007).
________________________________________
"More important still, during all that period and to the present
time,
it
was not possible freely to report or discuss a third vital matter:
Zionist
Nationalism. In this case the freedom of the press has become a
fallacy
during the past two decades. Newspaper-writers have become less and
less
free to express any criticism, or report any fact unfavourable to
this
new
ambition of the Twentieth Century. When I eventually went to America
I
found
that this ban, for such it is in practice, prevailed even more
rigidly
there
than in my own country.
Today an awakening is supposed to have occurred in the matter of
Communism.
During the most fateful and decisive years of the Second War, when
the
things were being done which obviously set the stage for a third one,
it was
in fact almost impossible for any independent writer to publish any
reasonable criticism, supported by no matter what evidence, about
Soviet
Communism and its intentions. Now, when the damage is done, Communism
is
much attacked, but even so the mass of Communist writers who were
planted in
the American and British press during those years has by no means
been
displaced; and the attentive newspaper-reader in either country may
see for
himself how the most specious Communist sophistries are daily
injected
into
the editorial arguments and the news-columns of newspapers professing
the
most respectable principles.
In the matter of Zionist Nationalism, which I hold to be allied in
its
roots
to Soviet Communism, the ban is much more severe. In my own adult
lifetime
as a journalist, now covering thirty years, I have seen this secret
ban grow
from nothing into something approaching a law of lese majeste at some
absolute court of the dark past. In daily usage, no American or
British
newspaper, apparently, now dares to print a line of news or comment
unfavourable to the Zionist ambition; and under this thrall matters
are
reported favourably or non-committally, if they are reported at all,
which
if they occurred elsewhere would be denounced with the most piteous
cries of
outraged morality. The inference to me is plain: the Zionist
Nationalists
are powerful enough to govern governments in the great countries of
the
remaining West!
I believe Zionist Nationalism to be a political movement organized in
all
countries, which aims to bring all Jews under its thrall just as
Communism
enslaved the Russians and National Socialism the Germans. I hold it
to
be as
dangerous as both of those, and when I recall the results that came
of
the
subtle suppression of information in the cases of Stalinism and
Hitlerism, I
judge that the consequences of this even more rigorous suppression
will not
be less grave.
I think it a cardinal error to identify 'Jews' with Zionist
Nationalism,
'Russians' with Communism, or 'Germans' with National Socialism. I
saw
the
enslavement of Germans and Russians and know different. I believe
that
the
astonishingly powerful attempt to prevent any discussion of Zionist
Nationalism by dismissing it as the expression of an aversion to
Jews,
as
Jews, is merely meant to stop any public discussion of its objects,
which
seem to me to be as dangerous to Jew as to Gentile. Of the three
groups
which have appeared, like stormy petrels, to presage the tempests of
our
century, the Zionist Nationalists appear to me the most powerful.
National
Socialism, I think, was but a stooge or stalking horse for the
pursuit
of
Communist aims. Communism is genuinely tigerish, and was strong
enough
to
infest governments everywhere and distort the policies which were
pursued
behind the screen of military operations; but, if forced into a
corner
by
the rising unease of their peoples, Western politicians are prepared
in the
last resort to turn against it.
But Zionist Nationalism! . . . That is a different matter. Today
American
Presidents and British Prime Ministers, and all their colleagues,
watch it
as anxiously as Muslim priests watch for the crescent moon on the eve
of
Ramadan, and bow to it as the faithful prostrating themselves in the
mosque
at Mecca. The thing was but a word unknown to the masses forty years
ago;
today Western politicians hardly dare take the seals of office
without
first, or immediately afterwards, making public obeisance towards
this
strange new ambition."-Douglas Reed, Somewhere South of Suez, Devin-
Adir, U.
S. A., (1951), pp. 8-10.
________________________________________
"'Death to Arabs' was just one of the hateful messages left by Jewish
settlers on Muslim graves after a destructive rampage on a cemetery
and
village near Nablus Tuesday."-Ronny Shaked, "Settlers defile
Palestinian
graves under IDF watch: Jewish settlers desecrate graves, wreak havoc
in
Palestinian village", www.ynetnews.com,
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3356741,00.html, (25
January
2007).
________________________________________
VIDEO: Now Playing: Gov. Romney Concludes Remarks on Iran Threat
"Israeli billionaire and media mogul Haim Saban is at the top of the
list of
donors to political campaigns in the US."-Itamar Eichner, "Israeli
billionaire Saban biggest donor to US politicians", www.ynetnews.com,
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3355786,00.html, (23
January
2007).
"Republican US presidential aspirant Mitt Romney summed up the
sentiment of
four US presidential hopefuls who addressed the Seventh Annual
Herzliya
Conference over the last two days by saying, 'Iran must be stopped,
Iran can
be stopped, and Iran will be Stopped.' [***] Another Republican
hopeful,
Sen. John McCain, said the US should 'intensify' its military support
for
Israel to ensure that the country maintained it strategic edge over
those
who were bent on destroying it, such as Iran. [***] Democratic
presidential
hopeful Sen. John Edwards, meanwhile, said by video conference that
stopping
Iran from developing nuclear weapons 'is the greatest challenge of
our
generation.'"-Herb Keinon and Tovah Lazaroff, "US politicians rip
Iran
in
Herzliya", The Jerusalem Post,
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?c=JPArticle&cid=1167467797900&...,
(23 January 2007).
"New York's junior senator, Hillary Rodham Clinton, is expected to
snare the
lion's share of the Jewish community's substantial political
donations
in
the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination."-E. J.
Kessler,
"Hillary the Favorite in Race for Jewish Donations", The Jewish Daily
Forward,
http://www.forward.com/articles/hillary-the-favorite-in-race-for-jewi...,
(23 January 2007).
"The Israeli people are facing the threat of a nuclear Holocaust,
former US
Speaker of the House of Representatives Newt Gingrich warned the
Herzliya
Conference held by the Institute for Policy and Strategy at IDC
Herzliya on
Tuesday afternoon. Meanwhile, he said, the United States could lose a
few
million people or a number of cities to a terrorist attack with
weapons of
mass destruction."-Yaakov Lappin, "Israel faces nuclear Holocaust
warns
Gingrich", www.ynetnews.com,
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3356103,00.html, (23
January
2007).
"Former Massachusetts governor and GOP presidential contender Mitt
Romney
laid out a five-point plan for preventing Iran from going nuclear at
the
Herzliya Conference in Israel today."-Campaign Confidential, "Iran
Hawk:
Mitt Romney", The Jewish Daily Forward,
http://www.forward.com/blogs/campaign-confidential/iran-hawk-mitt-rom...,
(23 January 2007).
________________________________________
"John Edwards[. . .] sounded Joe Lieberman-like on Iran[. . . .]"-
Jennifer
Siegel, "Iran Hawk: John Edwards", The Jewish Daily Forward,
http://www.forward.com/blogs/campaign-confidential/iran-hawk-john-edw...,
(23 January 2007).
________________________________________
"Extolling the ideals of socialist thinker Karl Marx, Chavez defended
his
government's effort to establish a socialist model and rejected US
concerns
over a measure to grant him broad lawmaking powers, saying: 'Go to
hell,
gringos! Go home!' [***] The National Assembly, controlled by the
president's political allies, is expected to give final approval this
week
to what it calls the 'enabling law,' which would grant Chavez
authority to
pass a series of laws by decree during an 18-month period."-
Associated
Press, "Chavez tells US to 'go to hell' in talk-show", The Jerusalem
Post,
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1167467784737&pagename=JPo...,
(22 January 2007). See also: "Enabling Act" or Ermaechtigungsgesetz
for a
comparison to Adolf Hitler.
________________________________________
"[. . .]First of all, I would have no peace treaty with Syria. That's
number
one. If Syria really wants peace, if they want peace, see number one,
they
have to give up land. They have to give up everything up to Damascus.
I
don't want this Damascus, it's a smelly, stinky place. That I don't
need.
It's one big toilet. But up to Damascus, I'll take. And Syria has to
behave
itself, and has to kill out all the terrorists and Hezbullah. It's
never
gonna happen, but in order for anyone to have peace with Israel they
have to
give up land. And if Syria will kill terrorists, and give up land, so
then
we'll promise peace with Syria, and we won't smash their heads in.
How
does
that sound? We won't smash the heads of the diaper heads, we won't
smash the
pamper heads, we won't smash the huggies heads. That's what I
say. . .
That's my peace. [. . .]"- Tovia Singer on Israel National Radio,
http://www.israelnationalradio.com/Asx/tovias-tu-2.asx,
http://www.israelnationalradio.com/#tovia, (16 January 2007 / Hour
2).
________________________________________
"The main umbrella group of American Jewish organizations is set to
visit
Dubai and Abu Dhabi next month in a sign of the growing concern among
Sunni
regimes over Iran's nuclear and regional ambitions. The trip, by a
delegation from the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish
Organizations to the main power centers of the United Arab Emirates,
is
notable because the Sunni-majority UAE does not have formal
diplomatic
ties
with Israel."-Marc Perelman, "Groups Head to Emirates, as Worries
Grow
Over
Iran", The Jewish Daily Forward,
http://www.forward.com/articles/groups-head-to-emirates-as-worries-gr...,
(19 January 2007).
________________________________________
"A group of rabbis have issued a halachic opinion implying that OC
Central
Command Maj.-Gen. Yair Naveh deserves to be killed. The rabbis, all
connected with a movement to resurrect the Sanhedrin, the ancient
Jewish
governing body, said in their halachic ruling this week that Naveh
was
guilty of being a moser, a Hebrew word that can be roughly translated
as an
informant or traitor."-Matthew Wagner, "Rabbis: Naveh deserves to be
killed", The Jerusalem Post,
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?c=JPArticle&cid=1167467765105&...,
(18 January 2007).
"Two additional halachic laws are of special importance both
generally
and
specifically when related to the Rabin assassination. These two laws,
employed since talmudic times to kill Jews, were invoked by the
assassin,
Yigal Amir, as his justification for killing Prime Minister Rabin and
are
still emphasized by Jews who approved or have barely condemned that
assassination. These are the 'law of the pursuer' (din rodef) and the
'law
of the informer' (din moser).[Notation: 'Moser,' the Hebrew word for
informer, is a terrible insult for Jews, similar to the word
'collaborator'
for Palestinians.] The first law commands every Jew to kill or to
wound
severely any Jew who is perceived as intending to kill another Jew.
According to halachic commentaries, it is not necessary to see such a
person
pursuing a Jewish victim. It is enough if rabbinic authorities, or
even
competent scholars, announce that the law of the pursuer applies to
such a
person. The second law commands every Jew to kill or wound severely
any Jew
who, without a decision of a competent rabbinical authority, has
informed
non-Jews, especially non-Jewish authorities, about Jewish affairs or
who has
given them information about Jewish property or who has delivered
Jewish
persons or property to their rule or authority. Competent religious
authorities are empowered to do, and at times have done, those things
forbidden to other Jews in the second law. During the long period of
incitement preceding the Rabin assassination, many Haredi and
messianic
writers applied these laws to Rabin and other Israeli leaders. The
religious
insiders based themselves on later developments in Halacha that came
to
include other categories of Jews who were defined as 'those to whom
the law
of the pursuer' applied. Every Jew had a religious duty to kill those
Jews
who were so included. Historically, Jews in the diaspora followed
this
law
whenever possible, until at least the advent of the modern state. In
the
Tsarist Empire Jews followed this law until well into the nineteenth
century."-I. Shahak and N. Mezvinsky, Jewish Fundamentalism in
Israel,
Pluto
Press, London, (1999), pp. 137-138.
________________________________________
"Over the last couple of weeks, I have talked with people familiar
with the
meetings four U.S. senators recently had in the Middle East. One of
them
asked me a question: Can you guess which two meetings were the most
similar?
I tried and failed, so he gave me the answer: 'The meeting with
[King]
Abdullah [of Saudi Arabia] was the Bedouin version of the meeting
with
[Israeli opposition leader] Benjamin Netanyahu.' Netanyahu is the
most
vocal
alarmist on Iran, and in the meetings he has with U.S. visitors, he
tends to
repeat the analogy he uses in public. It's not about Vietnam, and
it's
not
about Cambodia. 'This is 1938,' he says. 'Iran is Germany, and it is
about
to arm itself with nuclear weapons.' The Saudi monarch, I wrote in
Ha'aretz,
'for whom the Nazi analogy is not his natural domain, expressed
exactly the
same fear, but in somewhat different words.'"-Shmuel Rosner, "Did We
Just
Declare War on Iran?", www.slate.com, http://www.slate.com/id/2157489/,
(12
January 2007).
"We must turn to Hillary Clinton and other potential presidential
candidates
in the Democratic Party so that they publicly support immediate
action
by
Bush against Iran. We should also approach European countries so that
they
support American actions in Iran, so that Bush will not be isolated
in
the
international arena again. We must clandestinely cooperate with Saudi
Arabia
so that it also persuades the US to strike Iran."-Brigadier General
(Res.)
Oded Tira, Former IDF Chief Artillery Officer, "What to do with
Iran?", (30
December 2006), http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3346275,00.html
________________________________________
"The many controversial issues concerning Palestine and the path to
peace
for Israel are intensely debated among Israelis and throughout other
nations - but not in the United States. For the last 30 years, I have
witnessed and experienced the severe restraints on any free and
balanced
discussion of the facts. This reluctance to criticize any policies of
the
Israeli government is because of the extraordinary lobbying efforts
of
the
American-Israel Political Action Committee and the absence of any
significant contrary voices. It would be almost politically suicidal
for
members of Congress to espouse a balanced position between Israel and
Palestine, to suggest that Israel comply with international law or to
speak
in defense of justice or human rights for Palestinians."-Jimmy
Carter,
Thirty-Ninth President of the United States of America, "Speaking
frankly





On Oct 27, 2:23 pm, Joe Cooper <contratr...@126.com> wrote:
> Aviroce <dudaras...@gmail.com> wrote in news:d4a429b6-70b5-418d-90f3-
> 6ce416e7a...@4g2000yql.googlegroups.com:
>
> > RACISM IS DESTRUCTIVE TO AMERICA, LEADS ADELSON BUY THE PRESIDENT
> > By Aviroce
>
> So why, knowing this, are you such a rabid racist?
>
> --
> Obama Voters Are Ignorami:http://spectator.org/blog/2012/09/25/obama-voters-ignoramuses
> In His Own Words:    Barack Obama Reviewedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8R5GvwUFU8

[Joe Cooper]

Aviroce <dudar...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:444b614f-91ce-4905...@j18g2000yqf.googlegroups.com:


So you are planning to leave the United States soon, to reduce the level of
racism here?

That's certainly good news.

[Aviroce]

I am an American and I am here to stay. You are a Jew and have been to leave as of birth. Nothing new. A Jew is not a citizen of the country of birth. Jew is only citizen of Israel.