This sounds like Nazi behavior to me
Major Debacle
the east of Egypt. He took Agag king of the Amalekites alive, and all
his people he totally destroyed with the sword. But Saul and the army
spared Agag and the best of the sheep and cattle, the fat calves and
lambs—everything that was good. These they were unwilling to destroy
completely, but everything that was despised and weak they totally
destroyed.
1 Samuel 15:7-9
Day Brown
> Then Saul attacked the Amalekites all the way from Havilah to Shur, to
> the east of Egypt. He took Agag king of the Amalekites alive, and all
> his people he totally destroyed with the sword. But Saul and the army
> spared Agag and the best of the sheep and cattle, the fat calves and
> completely, but everything that was despised and weak they totally
> destroyed.
>
> 1 Samuel 15:7-9
All of the Levantine scriptures have an alpha male tyrant concept of the
divine who provides forgiveness for anything done in his name. I would
not belong to a religion that was such a facile tool of demagoguery.
Many of the young women I know get it. Archeology reveals there really
was a 'Golden Age of Peace', back when the accepted concept of the
divine was the Great Earth Mother, aka Gaia, Potnia, Sophia, Brigit,
Hera, Juno, Athena, Astarte, Diana, Istar, Freya...
There are so many names cause nobody went to war over what the name
should be. Young women get that too.
Then too, consider the problem a demagogue would have trying to rile up
a mob or an army by claiming that *HE* speaks in *HER* name. It just
does not work for him. Which young women also get.
And since young women now make more money than young men, they will use
it to further the faith in the Goddess rather than church, which has
always preached peace, but could never deliver on it.
docremington
Day Brown wrote:
> Major Debacle wrote:
> > [drivel] ...
> What Joshua did to the land of Canaan we now call genocide.
> All of the Levantine scriptures have an alpha male tyrant concept of the
> divine who provides forgiveness for anything done in his name. I would
> not belong to a religion that was such a facile tool of demagoguery.
> Many of the young women I know get it. Archeology reveals there really
> was a 'Golden Age of Peace', back when the accepted concept of the
> divine was the Great Earth Mother, aka Gaia, Potnia, Sophia, Brigit,
> Hera, Juno, Athena, Astarte, Diana, Istar, Freya...
> There are so many names cause nobody went to war over what the name
> should be. Young women get that too.
> Then too, consider the problem a demagogue would have trying to rile up
> a mob or an army by claiming that *HE* speaks in *HER* name. It just
> does not work for him. Which young women also get.
> And since young women now make more money than young men, they will use
> it to further the faith in the Goddess rather than church, which has
> always preached peace, but could never deliver on it.
>
Why's all that effort to hide affection for young women in this
progressive drivel?
Major Debacle
>
> Day Brown wrote:
>> Major Debacle wrote:
>>> [drivel] ...
The Tanakh is drivel?
Interesting, coming from someone who appears to support Israel's right
to exist.
docremington
Major Debacle wrote:
> docremington wrote:
> >
> > Day Brown wrote:
> >> Major Debacle wrote:
> >>> [drivel] ...
>
> The Tanakh is drivel?
>
Don't think so, but drivel is. Duh.
> Interesting, coming from someone who appears to support Israel's right
> to exist.
What's interesting about it?
docremington
Major Debacle wrote:
> docremington wrote:
> >
> > Day Brown wrote:
> >> Major Debacle wrote:
> >>> [drivel] ...
>
> The Tanakh is drivel?
>
Don't think so, but drivel is. Duh.
> Interesting, coming from someone who appears to support Israel's right
> to exist.
What's interesting about it?
Major Debacle
>
> Major Debacle wrote:
>> docremington wrote:
>>> Day Brown wrote:
>>>> Major Debacle wrote:
>>>>> [drivel] ...
>> The Tanakh is drivel?
>>
>
> Don't think so, but drivel is. Duh.
The only thing that you snipped, and referred to as drivel, were three
verses from 1 Samuel 15, one of the books that comprise the Jewish holy
text, the Tanakh.
>
>> Interesting, coming from someone who appears to support Israel's right
>> to exist.
>
> What's interesting about it?
What's interesting is that are obviously too stupid to recognize the
Jewish holy text when you see it, and instead refer to it as drivel.
Also interesting is the fact that now you are locked into defending your
reference to the Jewish holy text as "drivel".
Flail away. I'll be enjoying it.
docremington
Major Debacle wrote:
> docremington wrote:
> > Major Debacle wrote:
> >> docremington wrote:
> >>> Day Brown wrote:
> >>>> Major Debacle wrote:
> >>>>> [drivel] ...
> >> The Tanakh is drivel?
> >
> > Don't think so, but drivel is. Duh.
>
> The only thing that you snipped, and referred to as drivel, were three
> verses from 1 Samuel 15, one of the books that comprise the Jewish holy
> text, the Tanakh.
>
Cool, someone is, actually, reading something, but I digress. And the
relevance of it to the wanton drivel, so gayfully displayed here, is,
exactly, what?
> >> Interesting, coming from someone who appears to support Israel's right
> >> to exist.
> >
> > What's interesting about it?
>
> What's interesting is that are obviously too stupid to recognize the
> Jewish holy text when you see it, and instead refer to it as drivel.
Did I?
> Also interesting is the fact that now you are locked into defending your
> reference to the Jewish holy text as "drivel".
> Flail away. I'll be enjoying it.
Drivel.