Liberalism--Light On Crime
Creamsicle
course not. Ever heard a conservative make that argument? Yes, all the
time.
Here is a perfect example of some sick bastard who repeatedly victimizes
children. Yet, he is always released to attack again.
This sick bastard is a white guy who butt-raped a 3 year-old black boy.
What a sick bastard. Now that little boy is going to grow up to be a
monster; not that he wouldn't have grown up to be a monster anyway. But
now he is a monster with a big chip on his shoulder.
From: http://www.kare11.com/news/news-article.asp?NEWS_ID=47988
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Man Arrested, Charged in Rape of 3-Year-Old
The arrest and prosecution of a repeat sex offender in St. Paul has
the alleged victim's family asking why the accused isn't behind bars for
his earlier crimes.
Thirty-seven-year old Van Alvin Norton is a level-three sex offender,
the type considered most likely to re-offend. He's charged with sexually
assaulting a three year old.
The following is based on the KARE 11 TV story reported by Amy
Hockert. Please note: the contents of the following are graphic. The name
of the alleged victim and his family members have been suppressed to
protect their privacy.
The boy's grandmother says the incident has left emotional scars on
the child.
"It is a horrifying incident," the boy's grandmother said. "Once it
gets dark, he doesn't want to come outside. He doesn't want to be around
anybody, he don't trust nobody and he's just three years old."
Police say Norton has a history of fondling and exposing himself to
children — and he committed his worst crime yet on May 15. Officers
believe he raped the child.
The child was playing in a St. Paul park and disappeared briefly.
When he was found he was crying and holding two dollars. The boy said a
man "hurt him" then gave him the money.
A copy of the charges obtained by KARE 11 shows investigators found
evidence of a rape and crime lab tests identified DNA believed to be
Norton's.
"Why? Why can't he spend 60, a lifetime in jail, he keeps hurting
little kids?" the victim's grandmother asks.
Law enforcement says there is little they can do.
"I'm not sure there's anything anyone could've done to avoid this
situation," says Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner. "He served his
time, he was registered as he was supposed to be, he was reporting to his
probation officer as he was supposed to."
Gaertner says Norton would not have been breaking the law if was
near, or even in, that park —even though he was on probation for a sex
crime.
"Fortunately, as I say, the laws have gotten increasingly more
punitive and we have laws that target repeat sex offenders and we
sometimes can get them put away for life," Gaertner says.
Norton is charged with kidnapping and criminal sexual conduct-- and
if convicted, he's expected to spend a minimum of 12 years in prison.
However, if prosecutors decide they aren't satisfied with Norton's
sentence, they do have the option of asking the state to commit him to a
security hospital indefinitely under the state's sexual predator law.
"I want to see justice, justice well done, not just a couple years
and let him out, then he'll do something else to another child. I want to
see him spend life in jail," the victim's grandmother says.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Morons like Karl are to blame for this. Oh no, we can't punish someone
harshly--these criminals should be executed. We have to understand their
culture and the circumstances that made them commit the crime. Well, if
the butt-rapist was black, white racism would be to blame. I guess since
he's white, it's just all his fault.
Who's yer daddy, boy?!
King of SCAA
Obbie L Kirk
I hope that all of you arrogant caucasains are not taking this defeat too
personall over the woman, that defeated Serena, not too long ago.
The Queen of tennis had to come forward and take back what was hers in the
first place.
Work Work Work
news:20030703135610...@tcfreenet.org...
It's a dream come true for you, Oddie. You can watch her huge boobs and
booty bounce around all over that nice, green Centre Court.
Imagine those enormous, buffalo thighs locked around your little burrhead!
Maybe you and Karl can post your 3-way fantasies, unless you're so racist
you wouldn't share a Williams sistah wif a White man.
Mr Wonderful
You can have some of that big ass and those big titties,
unless you are too much of a gay bob to partake.
In that case you can suck her daddies dick.
"Work Work Work" <all...@all.night> wrote in message
news:vg96pf2...@corp.supernews.com...
Unknown
wrote:
There is one thing she can't beat, and that is Father Time. Enjoy her
feats now, soon she'll be a warmup act for some 17 year-old.
Roger Brown
>There is one thing she can't beat, and that is Father Time. Enjoy her
>feats now, soon she'll be a warmup act for some 17 year-old.
You really get stuck on idiotic opinions for which you have no factual
basis. This is actually kind of fun to watch.
Of course time affects everyone. Like, duh. In the end we all die.
This is how profound your opinion is. The Duh Theory of Tennis, by
Voice of Reason.
There is no evidence that Serena's tennis ability is declining. She is
number one in the world, and is likely to remain number one. She is
not even 22 years old!
Andre Agassi tanked, but he was still seeded number one at age 33. I
think Serena has some time left.
Meredith
Roger Brown <bro...@erols.com> wrote:
Serena has not only has time, but (as you know) she has world-class
skills and money. She picked up a cool million on the Wimbledon women's
title, alone.
It's doubtful that she's concerned about playing second fiddle to anyone
at anytime.
VoiclessOfReason is jealous. And yes, it's very amusing to watch.
Meredith
Obbie L Kirk
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, it was written:
> Tell me something that I don't know already, Mr. VOR! It was the
caucasoids that held a parade throughout these newsgroups just one month
ago talking about how Serena was defeated by this young lady. That
bullshit kind of made me feel bad, but I knew that there would be a
re-match between the two. I just didn't have any idea, that it was going
to be this soon. I watched this re-match and Serena had tore that young
girl to pieces.
Unknown
wrote:
>On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 11:31:14 -0400, VoiceOfReason <> wrote:
>
>>There is one thing she can't beat, and that is Father Time. Enjoy her
>>feats now, soon she'll be a warmup act for some 17 year-old.
>
>You really get stuck on idiotic opinions for which you have no factual
>basis. This is actually kind of fun to watch.
There is no factual basis to the fact everyone grows old, including
tennis players?
>Of course time affects everyone. Like, duh. In the end we all die.
>This is how profound your opinion is. The Duh Theory of Tennis, by
>Voice of Reason.
>
>There is no evidence that Serena's tennis ability is declining. She is
>number one in the world, and is likely to remain number one. She is
>not even 22 years old!
>
>Andre Agassi tanked, but he was still seeded number one at age 33. I
>think Serena has some time left.
And ya can start counting it down, wannabee.
Unknown
wrote:
Temporary reprieve. Neither you nor I nor Ms Williams can stop the
clock. It's as simple as that.
Obbie L Kirk
]
> It would have been nice for that caucasian chick to enjoy her victory
over SERENA, huh. This bitch could have been doing 'Got-Milk' commercials
by now, if she would have been able to pull it off again. I didn't get to
see the first competition, but I heard that she actually didn't win
the first previous match. I heard this woman had cheated; somehow,
someway, and the judges had let her get away with her stunt.
Unknown
wrote:
Of course. Whenever a black person loses, it's ALWAYS because of
cheating. No doubt the judges were white too, and the "fix" was in.
I see ya learned yer konspiracy lessons well.
Obbie L Kirk
> You can push-on with that, Bullshit. I don't know a damn thing about
Tennis and don't care too much for the game. I only started watching
tennis because of the Williams sisters. It was the announcers who
mentioned that SERENA's opponent had cheated. These guys were all around
tennis players, once before. Before the match even started, they were
showing this act of cheating over and over.
Unknown
wrote:
Since you just admitted you know "nothing" about tennis, *how* do you
know there was "cheating" going on just because someone on TV said so?
If there was cheating, did they explain how the judges let it stand?
Or did the announcers say the judges were part of it too? Hmmm?
Roger Brown
>On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 13:40:14 -0400, Roger Brown <bro...@erols.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 11:31:14 -0400, VoiceOfReason <> wrote:
>>
>>>There is one thing she can't beat, and that is Father Time. Enjoy her
>>>feats now, soon she'll be a warmup act for some 17 year-old.
>>
>>You really get stuck on idiotic opinions for which you have no factual
>>basis. This is actually kind of fun to watch.
>
>There is no factual basis to the fact everyone grows old, including
>tennis players?
There is no factual basis for your statement that soon she'll be a
warmup act for some 17 year-old
You know zip about tennis.
Unknown
wrote:
>On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 16:12:13 -0400, VoiceOfReason <> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 13:40:14 -0400, Roger Brown <bro...@erols.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 11:31:14 -0400, VoiceOfReason <> wrote:
>>>
>>>>There is one thing she can't beat, and that is Father Time. Enjoy her
>>>>feats now, soon she'll be a warmup act for some 17 year-old.
>>>
>>>You really get stuck on idiotic opinions for which you have no factual
>>>basis. This is actually kind of fun to watch.
>>
>>There is no factual basis to the fact everyone grows old, including
>>tennis players?
>
>There is no factual basis for your statement that soon she'll be a
>warmup act for some 17 year-old
Time will tell.
>You know zip about tennis.
But I do know quite a bit about Father Time.
You wait and see.
Obbie L Kirk
> John Mckenroe was one of the commentators that was pinpointing out
exactly what had happened along with some other experts.
Unknown
wrote:
And did he say the judges were part of the "cheating"?
Obbie L Kirk
> All of the experts had explained and supported SERENA's petition of an
illegal act that was comitted during the course of the game. And this
hurted Serena's heart so bad; I wish that I could have been there for
her, just to lend her my shoulder to cry on. At least she still came out
to be the champion.
Unknown
wrote:
I see. But the judges, the ones who were actually on the scene,
disagreed that an "illegal act" had been committed, right?
>And this
>hurted Serena's heart so bad; I wish that I could have been there for
>her, just to lend her my shoulder to cry on. At least she still came out
>to be the champion.
Frankly, I suspect you were watching the match in yer local bar, and
by this time you had tackled some 40's, and so you were just feeling
fine and looking for an excuse to lend out yer shoulder.
Kafou Lobo
You really have no shame, and you just can't resist slamming
anything or anyone black. We are all aware of the time constraints
in tennis, we are just saddened by your genuflexions - awaiting
the demise of some player - just because 'they' are black.
Your stocks are asymptotically approaching Enron's, redeem yourself.
Kafou "You are welcome." Lobo
Obbie L Kirk
> Thank-you, my brother!
Unknown
>VoiceOfReason <> wrote in message news:<24gggvs281e7t79dm...@4ax.com>...
>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:12:16 -0500, Obbie L Kirk <ki...@tcfreenet.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > I hope that all of you arrogant caucasains are not taking this defeat too
>> >personall over the woman, that defeated Serena, not too long ago.
>> >The Queen of tennis had to come forward and take back what was hers in the
>> >first place.
>>
>> There is one thing she can't beat, and that is Father Time. Enjoy her
>> feats now, soon she'll be a warmup act for some 17 year-old.
>
>You really have no shame, and you just can't resist slamming
>anything or anyone black. We are all aware of the time constraints
>in tennis, we are just saddened by your genuflexions - awaiting
>the demise of some player - just because 'they' are black.
Yer blind, because I never said anything about her being black.
Father Time hits everyone, without discrimination. He is an equal
opportunity dealer.
>Your stocks are asymptotically approaching Enron's, redeem yourself.
Yer babbling nonsense. Been hitting the bottle again, eh?
>Kafou "You are welcome." Lobo
For what?
Unknown
wrote:
>
>
>On 6 Jul 2003, Kafou Lobo wrote:
>
>> VoiceOfReason <> wrote in message news:<24gggvs281e7t79dm...@4ax.com>...
>> > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:12:16 -0500, Obbie L Kirk <ki...@tcfreenet.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I hope that all of you arrogant caucasains are not taking this defeat too
>> > >personall over the woman, that defeated Serena, not too long ago.
>> > >The Queen of tennis had to come forward and take back what was hers in the
>> > >first place.
>> >
>> > There is one thing she can't beat, and that is Father Time. Enjoy her
>> > feats now, soon she'll be a warmup act for some 17 year-old.
>>
>> You really have no shame, and you just can't resist slamming
>> anything or anyone black. We are all aware of the time constraints
>> in tennis, we are just saddened by your genuflexions - awaiting
>> the demise of some player - just because 'they' are black.
>> Your stocks are asymptotically approaching Enron's, redeem yourself.
>>
>> Kafou "You are welcome." Lobo
>
>
>> Thank-you, my brother!
Ummm, Obbie my homie, I don't think Kafool was talking to you.
jmdrake
> On 6 Jul 2003 21:30:30 -0700, ka...@yahoo.com (Kafou Lobo) wrote:
>
> Yer blind, because I never said anything about her being black.
> Father Time hits everyone, without discrimination. He is an equal
> opportunity dealer.
Oh give it up VOR! At this point everyone knows that you are racist.
The only thing that you've ever had to hold over the Williams sisters
is the fact that their father is arrogant. But you've NEVER said
jack about the arrogant fathers of WHITE tennis players! Venus and
Serena are class acts. Great at their sport and great at
sportsmanship.
Regards,
John M. Drake
Kafou Lobo
> VoiceOfReason <> wrote in message news:<bj8kgvskmkiseedpu...@4ax.com>...
> > On 6 Jul 2003 21:30:30 -0700, ka...@yahoo.com (Kafou Lobo) wrote:
> >
> > Yer blind, because I never said anything about her being black.
> > Father Time hits everyone, without discrimination. He is an equal
> > opportunity dealer.
>
> Oh give it up VOR! At this point everyone knows that you are racist.
I confess.... It took me a while to get his number. In the final
analysis, you are right. He is just as useless and as racist as
the other assholes in here.
Kafou
Roger Brown
>But I do know quite a bit about Father Time.
So does anyone over age 5.
Obbie L Kirk
> (OOOOH/Drum-Roll!)
>
>
>
>
Unknown
wrote:
>On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 20:18:02 -0400, VoiceOfReason <> wrote:
>
>>But I do know quite a bit about Father Time.
>
>So does anyone over age 5.
I guess this means yer still approaching 5, then.
Unknown
wrote:
>
>
Speaking of drum rolls, when are you going to learn to properly begin
a response to a previous post?
Good grief.
Unknown
>VoiceOfReason <> wrote in message news:<bj8kgvskmkiseedpu...@4ax.com>...
>> On 6 Jul 2003 21:30:30 -0700, ka...@yahoo.com (Kafou Lobo) wrote:
>>
>> Yer blind, because I never said anything about her being black.
>> Father Time hits everyone, without discrimination. He is an equal
>> opportunity dealer.
>
>Oh give it up VOR! At this point everyone knows that you are racist.
Who is "everyone"? Besides yerself, of course.
>The only thing that you've ever had to hold over the Williams sisters
>is the fact that their father is arrogant. But you've NEVER said
>jack about the arrogant fathers of WHITE tennis players! Venus and
>Serena are class acts. Great at their sport and great at
>sportsmanship.
So what? Father Time won't care, and you know what? He won't give
YOU a break either.
Unknown
Wrong. It may have taken a "while" to get my "number", but guess
what? Ya got it wrong!! After all that huffing and puffing.