Generally speaking, single-track explanations fail to encompass
The model of Whitesupremacy bases its descriptions on functionality, that
is, what people and things actually *do.*
ANY person or institution whose actions tend to defend or extend
the interests of Whitepower in the arts, the economy(ies), politics,
society, academia (etc) is therefore described as Whitesupremacist.
However, this is a broad description, and it's hopefully
understood that such a description refers to the aggregate of a person's
actions... that's why LBJ is fairly described as a Whitesupremacist, EVEN
THOUGH he signed a Civil Rights Bill into law (whose over-all merit I
leave for you in the US to decide). That's why Ronnie Reagan is fairly
described as a Whitesupremacist EVEN THOUGH he made MLK Day.
Of course, the model does not (need to) speak to an individual's
colour. That's why Gatscha Buthelezi and Clarence Thomas and that big
talk-show circuit ass hole Drew Brown (Flight Captain Sellout) are all
What does this have to do with Jewish people?
Anyone who asserts that ALL Jews at ALL times are either our
friends or our enemies in ALL THAT THEY DO is obviously wrong. The group
that is defined as "Jews" in the USA is most notable for their relations
to us, IMHO, in that they are WHITE. Although they are low on the White
social ladder, and of various states on the White economic ladder, they
are well placed on the White media and academic ladders. In these areas,
their actions (because we can't read thought) can be analysed.
What's clear is that a great many of them are (in aggregate terms
of their actions) Whitesupremacists.
Some of them have been very noble in a variety of struggles. I
have respect for George Breitman, for instance, who wrote and edited
books on/by Malcolm X. But as a group, Jews are, of course, Whites, and
overall, the aggregate of White actions and INactions is Whitesupremacist
(ditto male actions re: Malesupremacy). But for us to exonerate them as a
group because they have been persecuted by their fellow Whites seems to
me short-sighted. Worse still, I think many of them use their
exploitation/slaughter by other Whites to make us believe that they
understand us and sympathise with us better than do other Whites. To a
small extent, this is true.
But a massive component of individual and group mentality is
one's own sense of and actual possession of power, and there is no
question that, even given the social exclusion of Jews in many social and
employment spheres by other Whites, as a community, they are exerting far
more in the way of self-determination than are we. Although our economic
power is massive (here's a small but illustrative example: we buy one out
of every four movie tickets in the US. Think about it.), it's expressed
uncritically and passively.
Since our sense of and possession of power is vastly different as
a community than it is for American Jews, it's naive to suggest that
we're similar enough to be "natural allies."
Besides, power understands power, and power allies itself with
power. You cannot have any fruitful "alliance" with ANYone (even on a
social or personal level) if there is a significant imbalance of power
between you. See Carmichael & Hamilton's *Black Power.*
Jews are White. And as per the truism, some are good and some are
bad. But it's not individual personalities that are our analytical or
practical concerns. It's GROUP DYNAMICS AND POWER. Whites will
consciously or unconsciously continue to defend and extend
Whitesupremacy, either by action or inaction.
And as the model of Whitesupremacy predicts, tragically, so will we.
"It takes a nation of millions to hold us back."
How many "millions" of us are there?
Xu, us em maa-xeru!
(Splendour, power and triumph [of Ra]!)