Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Troops Will be in Afghanistan for Next 20 Years: Brit
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
ny.transfer.n...@blythe.org  
View profile  
 More options Oct 18 2006, 3:02 pm
Newsgroups: soc.culture.afghanistan, soc.culture.usa, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.republicans, alt.politics.democrats
From: NY.Transfer.N...@blythe.org
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:02:07 GMT
Local: Wed, Oct 18 2006 3:02 pm
Subject: Troops Will be in Afghanistan for Next 20 Years: Brit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Troops Will be in Afghanistan for Next 20 Years: Brit

Via NY Transfer News Collective  *  All the News that Doesn't Fit

The Independent - Oct 18, 2006
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia/article1886633.ece

Troops will be in Afghanistan for next 20 years, says commander

By Kim Sengupta

The commander of the British forces returning from Helmand said that his
forces were having to make up for the time lost by the decision of the US
and UK to invade Iraq instead of concentrating on post-Taliban Afghanistan.

"We could have carried on in 2002 in the same way we have gone about
business now," said Brigadier Ed Butler. "Have the interim four years made
a difference? I think realistically they have. It doesn't mean that we will
not achieve what we set out to do."

Stressing that he was speaking from a strictly UK perspective, and not for
the international community, Brigadier Butler added: "So have we slipped
back? I don't think we have slipped back, we may have marked time and I
think we are starting to make up for that time."

Brigadier Butler continued that an international presence may be required
in Afghanistan for the next 20 years, but he did not specify how long the
British forces would have to remain.

Brigadier Butler, who heads the 3 Para Battle Group, has just handed over
command in Afghanistan. He disclosed that his troops had come close to
running out of supplies ."It got pretty close. We never actually ran out
but that was the nature of the conflict. The guys were not starving but
people were down to their belt rations," he said.

"I think we might have been surprised on occasion how persistent the
attacks were and how enduring the scale of the operation was. I think some
may have underestimated the tenacity and ferocity of the Taliban."

The Brigadier's comments came as the UN Office on Drugs and Crime called
for Western troops in Afghanistan to attack opium traders, saying the drugs
situation there is "out of control".

Opium cultivation rose by 59 per cent this year, according to the UN's
figures, to an all-time record of 165,000 hectares.

That leaves a country that is practically run by the West supplying 92 per
cent of the world's opium - much of which ends up as heroin.

The UN agency's remarks are stark news for Britain, which at one time was
in charge of reducing opium production in Afghanistan.

Around 90 per cent of heroin on British streets comes from Afghanistan.

In the same period of time, opium cultivation in south-east Asia's "Golden
Triangle" of Burma, Laos and Thailand, the other major source, fell by 29
per cent.

"You can say that Afghanistan is pretty much out of control," Preeta
Bannerjee, a spokeswoman for UNODC said. "Afghanistan is practically...
supplying the world's opium. There's also evidence that the country is
increasingly hooked on its own opium."

The UN agency is calling for Nato troops and their Afghan allies to attack
heroin labs, opium markets and convoys transporting the drug, Ms Bannerjee
said yesterday.

But the agency's warning will come as a surprise to no one in Afghanistan,
where Western troops already know the opium trade is out of control.

Around 2.9m Afghans are involved in growing opium - 12.6 per cent of the
total population - according to the UN's own figures.

Most of those are farmers who scrape only a subsistence living from the
opium crop. The majority of the $3bn revenue from the opium industry goes
to the warlords who still control it - and to the Taliban, according to
UNODC.

The agency warned yesterday that the Taliban are funding their campaign
against British and other Nato troops from the opium trade, buying raw
opium from farmers and selling it on at a profit.

© 2006 Independent News and Media Limited

                                *
================================================================
 NY Transfer News Collective    *    A Service of Blythe Systems
           Since 1985 - Information for the Rest of Us          
 Search Archives: http://olm.blythe-systems.com/htdig/search.html
 List Archives:   http://olm.blythe-systems.com/pipermail/nytr/
 Subscribe: http://olm.blythe-systems.com/mailman/listinfo/nytr
================================================================

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFNnmYiz2i76ou9wQRAnQdAJsEr41T4rNQHbYmOk1vasV+gnswCACeNoUN
YMfQIcBg9SH9PfQ5vLs5N1c=
=wLvH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google