ARRESTED GROWTH: Boys hurt animals. Girls don't. But men don't
either. If a father's
a masc insecure obnoxious paranoid clown, he'll teach his boy to
remain a boy--this to the point of watching any sports whatsoever to
the neglect of the boy's academic growt--
anyone's team anywhere anytime.
Anti-socially produced ones ALSO:
gay rlgs rt leaders in the bus of making straights afraid of being
wrongly
ferreted out as gay; once upon a time offspring of graduates from any
college
that may once have been known as "The Gay Ivy," those in the politics-
by-fear-and-fraud
business
Hitler famously feminine. Supposed JFK assassination N.O.
operatives
characterized as gay fascists.
Scapegoating 4 Profit:
Demonize a group for associating foes with that group
(e.g.,
Jane Norton publicly
questioning Ken Buck's, Sharron Angle questioning Harry Reid's, and
Ann Coulter
questioning John Edwards', Al Gore's masculinity.)
The practical aim: control of water, transportation, the
absence of the government ombudsmanfunction.
Paine/Jefferson saw. Paine could not reconcile.
Other
wise I think she states half the formula.
Confucianism = W Rlgn ; Confucianism
lacks the tradition of demonizing a particular group so as
to assoc political foes with that group.
Mix Confucianism with China's technocracy, and
humanity can surely travel to another solar system
mature, analytical, compassionate, needing no offensive
arms.
http://sites.google.com/site/holychanges
P.S.:
GIFFORDS / COLORADO SPRINGS / POSTVILLE (INCLUSION REFLECTING PERSONAL
OPINION ONLY) NOW VIRTUALLY CONFIRM HITLER'S GAY, THEN IMMIGRANT, THEN
JEWISH VICTIMS WERE SO VICTIMIZED AS A CONSEQUENC
E OF THE SCAPEGOATING
OF GAYS SO AS TO ASSOCIATE POLITICAL FOES WITH THE DEMONIZED.
The reference to Postville only reflects my personal view that it was
singled out as
a consequence of the scapegoating of immigrants.
Just as in "From Russia With Love" the
villain is selected for his being a paranoid
schizophrenic, so are (reflects entirely personal opinion
as to anyone inferred) those selected for the
purpose of scapegoating for profit.
From my websites point of interest (universe working a little like a
computer:)
Brewer (original basis of the scapegoating for profit in Ariziona
(reflects my
opinion only:) transportation, water, health care, banking define the
economic power
puppeteering--is Brewer literally from serving a brewer needing
water, some of which
should go to those living on parched land?
http://sites.google.com/site/holychanges
also see
Arizona elections influenced by national groups, outside donors
Distant donors a big factor in ballot props