<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism</id>
  <title type="text">soc.atheism Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Living as an atheist and atheism in society. (Moderated)
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/soc.atheism/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="soc.atheism feed"/>
  <updated>2008-07-19T12:53:13Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Otis Willie PIO The American War Library</name>
  <email>themilitaryto...@pacbell.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-19T12:53:13Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/ee3fa54dd310b434/f763f312c07cf998?show_docid=f763f312c07cf998</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/ee3fa54dd310b434/f763f312c07cf998?show_docid=f763f312c07cf998"/>
  <title type="text">DOJ Disputes Atheist&#39;s Claim of Religious Intolerance in Military</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  DOJ Disputes Atheist&#39;s Claim of Religious Intolerance in Military &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.pubrecord.org/component/content/203.html?task=view&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; {EXCERPT} The Public Record, California - Fearing that higher ranking Army &lt;br&gt; officials would not come to his defense, Hall contacted the Military Religious &lt;br&gt; Freedom Foundation (MRFF), a watchdog group...
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Christopher A. Lee</name>
  <email>ca...@optonline.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-14T22:25:57Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/bbd3659bf8b0798d/6fc9976f149c71f2?show_docid=6fc9976f149c71f2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/bbd3659bf8b0798d/6fc9976f149c71f2?show_docid=6fc9976f149c71f2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: No atheists allowed in foxholes</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:05:10 -0400, nos...@nospam.com (Paul Ciszek) &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; I thought it was scary when the officer (Kiefer Sutherland) said that &lt;br&gt; in &amp;quot;A Few Good Men&amp;quot;.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>axlq</name>
  <email>a...@spamcop.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-14T19:24:57Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/76d9543551087c40/1d4a3ecac40fce7c?show_docid=1d4a3ecac40fce7c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/76d9543551087c40/1d4a3ecac40fce7c?show_docid=1d4a3ecac40fce7c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: NPR story</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;swJ8k.16051$E41.9...@text.new s.virginmedia.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Ad hominem. Yawn. &lt;br&gt; Because I tend to ignore posts that start out fulminating and go on &lt;br&gt; from there. You&#39;re lucky I read as far as the second paragraph in your &lt;br&gt; reply. Apologies if I missed a point buried in your prior rant. &lt;br&gt; I agree that a religious advisor may not be the best support person
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Ciszek</name>
  <email>nos...@nospam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-13T16:05:10Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/bbd3659bf8b0798d/b1680178a82d71cb?show_docid=b1680178a82d71cb</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/bbd3659bf8b0798d/b1680178a82d71cb?show_docid=b1680178a82d71cb"/>
  <title type="text">Re: No atheists allowed in foxholes</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;xXu7k.13879$E41.8...@text.new s.virginmedia.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Well, your deity may be able to save you from death, but he can&#39;t save &lt;br&gt; you from the sergeant. So if the sergeant says to go in the foxhole, &lt;br&gt; that&#39;s what you do. Unit, Corps, God, Country in that order.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Ciszek</name>
  <email>nos...@nospam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-13T16:05:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/76d9543551087c40/dedb9a1c3be0e95b?show_docid=dedb9a1c3be0e95b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/76d9543551087c40/dedb9a1c3be0e95b?show_docid=dedb9a1c3be0e95b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: NPR story</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Poor choice of example, I&#39;m afraid. Non-believers are being told &lt;br&gt; that non-believers have no place in the army--and since you can&#39;t &lt;br&gt; quit the army, that means you&#39;re supposed to become a believer &lt;br&gt; pretty damn quick if you know what&#39;s good for you.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Otis Willie PIO The American War Library</name>
  <email>themilitaryto...@pacbell.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-12T17:19:56Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/18e5e693dbfa45db/48dec4184ac95e5a?show_docid=48dec4184ac95e5a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/18e5e693dbfa45db/48dec4184ac95e5a?show_docid=48dec4184ac95e5a"/>
  <title type="text">Atheist soldier sues Pentagon</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Atheist soldier sues Pentagon &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/07/09/Atheist_soldier_sues_Pentagon/UPI-43971215607520/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; {EXCERPT} United Press International - Hall contends there is a pattern of &lt;br&gt; discrimination against non-Christians in the military, saying, &amp;quot;I think it&#39;s &lt;br&gt; utterly and totally wrong....
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Wayne Mitchell</name>
  <email>gwmitchell...@pobox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-06-26T16:26:27Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/24f6322249f1e197/cadfcd598c83d072?show_docid=cadfcd598c83d072</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/24f6322249f1e197/cadfcd598c83d072?show_docid=cadfcd598c83d072"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pew Forum religion survey</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Not necessarily &amp;quot;faulty&amp;quot;, but the survey does depend upon &lt;br&gt; self-identification. It can be no surprise that, in any category, some &lt;br&gt; of those who accept the label don&#39;t know what the definition or &lt;br&gt; parameters are. Among the religious sects, also, there were many who &lt;br&gt; identified with a particular sect, yet rejected some of the essential
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David V.</name>
  <email>s...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-06-26T14:07:32Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/76d9543551087c40/2f3bfb9888cc59de?show_docid=2f3bfb9888cc59de</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/76d9543551087c40/2f3bfb9888cc59de?show_docid=2f3bfb9888cc59de"/>
  <title type="text">Re: NPR story</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  axlq wrote: &lt;br&gt; In my 10 years with the US Navy I found all the chaplains to be &lt;br&gt; respectful of my Atheism. One even made sure &amp;quot;Atheist&amp;quot; was on my &lt;br&gt; dog tags. He was the Jewish chaplain. Nice guy.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Charles &amp; Mambo Duckman</name>
  <email>duck...@gfy.slf</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-06-26T14:06:27Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/76d9543551087c40/3a4103c428b67be9?show_docid=3a4103c428b67be9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/76d9543551087c40/3a4103c428b67be9?show_docid=3a4103c428b67be9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: NPR story</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  axlq wrote: &lt;br&gt; So what? The organization notoriously known for its spending on $600 hammers &lt;br&gt; wastes more taxpayer money on unnecessary bullshit and just because they &lt;br&gt; allegedly don&#39;t discriminate while they spend money on superstitious &lt;br&gt; bullshit, this somehow makes it OK? &lt;br&gt; Tried and proven? For doing what exactly? At best, chaplain &amp;quot;services&amp;quot; can
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mike</name>
  <email>n...@arizona.bay</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-06-26T09:43:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/76d9543551087c40/c05f142ad8e917ec?show_docid=c05f142ad8e917ec</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/76d9543551087c40/c05f142ad8e917ec?show_docid=c05f142ad8e917ec"/>
  <title type="text">Re: NPR story</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Responding to axlq: &lt;br&gt; Ok, now pull up the comments you snipped out, and explain the term &amp;quot;knee- &lt;br&gt; jerk reaction&amp;quot; and why you considered this accusation appropriate here. &lt;br&gt; (Curious how defensive you are about this, and how reactive you&#39;ve been &lt;br&gt; so far.) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Your comment &amp;quot;and even the lack of belief&amp;quot; indicates you see those who do
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>axlq</name>
  <email>a...@spamcop.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-06-25T23:03:27Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/76d9543551087c40/86c33088fbfbba36?show_docid=86c33088fbfbba36</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/76d9543551087c40/86c33088fbfbba36?show_docid=86c33088fbfbba36"/>
  <title type="text">Re: NPR story</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;hF58k.14835$E41....@text.news .virginmedia.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Neither is your knee-jerk reaction to anything smacking of religion. &lt;br&gt; For decades, the military has employed chaplains trained to deal &lt;br&gt; with, and respect, service men and women with all manner of &lt;br&gt; religious beliefs, including Wiccan, Pagan, Satanist, and even the
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>dali_70</name>
  <email>w_e_coyot...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-06-25T20:22:52Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/24f6322249f1e197/c20aa53343e2fcfb?show_docid=c20aa53343e2fcfb</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/24f6322249f1e197/c20aa53343e2fcfb?show_docid=c20aa53343e2fcfb"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pew Forum religion survey</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I&#39;d say it was probably a combination of poorly worded questions and &lt;br&gt; ignorance.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Brian Edmonds</name>
  <email>br...@gweep.ca</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-06-25T17:13:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/24f6322249f1e197/bdcf66f79c91dc2c?show_docid=bdcf66f79c91dc2c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/24f6322249f1e197/bdcf66f79c91dc2c?show_docid=bdcf66f79c91dc2c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pew Forum religion survey</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Or just that people are stupid. I&#39;d be unsurprised to find a number &lt;br&gt; of people self identifying as atheists because they&#39;re &amp;quot;mad at God&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; for the state of their sad, little lives. I sometimes wonder if some &lt;br&gt; people wouldn&#39;t be happier in one of the pantheistic religions, such &lt;br&gt; as that of the Norse or Romans. At least there the gods were openly
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>James Beck</name>
  <email>j...@reallykillersystems.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-06-25T17:11:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/24f6322249f1e197/f222045e45d46cbf?show_docid=f222045e45d46cbf</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/24f6322249f1e197/f222045e45d46cbf?show_docid=f222045e45d46cbf"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Pew Forum religion survey</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;Xns9AC7C3449D68Ftoddnverklar. ..@216.196.97.142&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; NsOeSbPm...@arsienne.calm says... &lt;br&gt; It has to be an anomaly of the survey system/questions. &lt;br&gt; How could someone that rejects the idea of gods also believe in a &lt;br&gt; personal or universal spirit. &lt;br&gt; Are not the two mutually exclusive? &lt;br&gt; Maybe, just maybe, the question was worded in such a manner that
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Todd N. Verklarung</name>
  <email>nsoesbpm...@arsienne.calm</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-06-25T04:51:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/24f6322249f1e197/fcc5eebe9f3a29eb?show_docid=fcc5eebe9f3a29eb</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.atheism/browse_thread/thread/24f6322249f1e197/fcc5eebe9f3a29eb?show_docid=fcc5eebe9f3a29eb"/>
  <title type="text">Pew Forum religion survey</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Lots of reporting on this. See, for example: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25334489/print/0/displaymode/1098&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; The most interesting (for this ng) quote: &lt;br&gt; &#39;Another finding almost defies explanation: 21 percent of &lt;br&gt; self-identified atheists said they believe in God or a universal spirit, &lt;br&gt; with 8 percent &amp;quot;absolutely certain&amp;quot; of it.&#39;
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
