Slimbox image opens in a new window without the SB-effect
29 views
Skip to first unread message
Bas Groep
Dec 21, 2008, 4:58:28 AM12/21/08
to Slimbox
Hello all,
I have used slimbox on other domains using the same code, but this
time when I click the image that is supposed to open SlimBox it opens
the image plainly in a new window (without the SB-effect). Anyone
familiar with this problem? It happens on both IE as on FF. In FF is
looks like it tries to use the SB-effect for a fraction of a second
before it renders the picture without the effect.
Thx.
I have used slimbox on other domains using the same code, but this
time when I click the image that is supposed to open SlimBox it opens
the image plainly in a new window (without the SB-effect). Anyone
familiar with this problem? It happens on both IE as on FF. In FF is
looks like it tries to use the SB-effect for a fraction of a second
before it renders the picture without the effect.
Thx.
Chris
Dec 21, 2008, 10:36:22 AM12/21/08
to Slimbox
This happens when a javascript error occurs.
Javascript errors mainly occur when there is a conflict with another
script, when you don't use the right mootools version, or when there
is a syntax error in the autoload code block (assuming you changed
it).
Javascript errors mainly occur when there is a conflict with another
script, when you don't use the right mootools version, or when there
is a syntax error in the autoload code block (assuming you changed
it).
Bas Groep
Dec 21, 2008, 2:14:10 PM12/21/08
to Slimbox
It seems that different templates respond differently to the script.
Could it be a <div> problem?
how do I check the autoload code block or the mootools version to be
compatible?
> > Thx.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Could it be a <div> problem?
how do I check the autoload code block or the mootools version to be
compatible?
>
> - Show quoted text -
Chris
Dec 22, 2008, 8:58:22 PM12/22/08
to Slimbox
It only depends on the javascript file you are using in a page. If you
are using Prototype + Moo.Fx in combination with MooTools for example,
it will probably not work.
are using Prototype + Moo.Fx in combination with MooTools for example,
it will probably not work.
Tom Kelshaw
Dec 28, 2008, 2:31:14 AM12/28/08
to Slimbox
I had this issue, from a ASP.NET AJAX conflict, somewhere.
Solved by using Milkbox instead: http://reghellin.com/milkbox/
Solved by using Milkbox instead: http://reghellin.com/milkbox/
Chris
Dec 28, 2008, 4:28:26 PM12/28/08
to Slimbox
If you show me a web page that is not working, I could tell you what's
wrong.
wrong.
mp
Jan 5, 2009, 1:34:07 AM1/5/09
to Slimbox
I have/had a similar problem as first stated... took me a looong time
to somewhat figure it out.
I was using jquery-1.2.3.pack.js, but when I switched to match the
jquery call in the example file (http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/
jquery/1.2.6/jquery.min.js) everything worked fine... so after
downloading the newest jquery (1.2.6) library and using that all is
good. not sure what the difference is, but worked for me.
mp
to somewhat figure it out.
I was using jquery-1.2.3.pack.js, but when I switched to match the
jquery call in the example file (http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/
jquery/1.2.6/jquery.min.js) everything worked fine... so after
downloading the newest jquery (1.2.6) library and using that all is
good. not sure what the difference is, but worked for me.
mp
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages