From: Carlo Wood <ca...@alinoe.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:45:27 +0100
Local: Sun, Feb 21 2010 5:45 am
Subject: [opensource-dev] Consensus? was: Client-side scripting in Snowglobe
It seems to me that most people still talk about untrusted,
portable, and grid-wide supported downloadable scripts when talking about Client-side scripting (sorry Morgaine). So, I propose to go with that, and call anything else --- The remainder of this post is about Client-extensions. I sense consensus on the following layered design: [current code base] + lots of hooks to be written | C++ API [1] | IPC API [2] | Plugin(s) One or more plugins then could provide a client-side - A scripting engine for language XYZ. [1] Ie, based on the yet to be written LLStateMachine class. -- PS Note that personally I'm against using mono for _______________________________________________ You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||