Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Second Life Developers
Home
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion Consensus? was: Client-side scripting in Snowglobe
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Dzonatas Sol  
View profile  
 More options Feb 23 2010, 7:22 am
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzona...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:22:11 -0800
Local: Tues, Feb 23 2010 7:22 am
Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Consensus? was: Client-side scripting in Snowglobe
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Marine Kelley wrote:
> Exactly my thinking too, the problem us not clear whether the players  
> are cooperative or in competition. It totally changes the result.

> But I guess that the real goal of this challenge is to call you  
> "stupid" and to gauge your reaction. If you yell or punch the  
> recruiter, you're dismissed. If you say "my bad, you're right", you're  
> dismissed. But if you argue and explain your theory clearly, calmly  
> and with the objective of solving the problem instead of just  
> defending yourself, you prove that you're someone who can integrate a  
> team that works on a system that is both technical and social.

Hmm. Let's think about this for a few...

The players are imperfect...

One is the recruiter that knows nothing about the recruitee...

The recruiter calls the recruitee "stupid"

In the reality of the recruitee, kids are missing (as in stolen),
undergoing unknown symptoms of major depression, blisters on feet from
working more than 40 hours a week, on up to 80 hours a week to keep
family together for more than a year, pressured to work more due to
legal problems, almost on the street due to leftover money not meeting
needs, etc etc (this is not made up)

If the recruitor has no knowledge of this, which they shouldn't because
of employment laws, then to call the recruitee "stupid" and for the
recruitee to act any bit calm would be a major ability to stay calm
under such hardship... even if the recruitee just simply said "my bad,
your right" just to pass up an unfair question and explain anything now
going on in the mind of the recruitee.

Major Depression Disorder is a disability that would be exploited by
such question, and this recruitee would never get hired due to this
disability, which is against law to not hire someone because of a
disability.

The reruitee states the obvious and the recruiter takes it as a legal
threat, which questions the ability of how this ever will work as a team
on a system that is both technical and social... where both win.

Long story short... but one is still losing, so when does the "fighting"
stop?
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google