Very interesting. Thanks, Brian, for finding and sharing. Some of my favorite (and/or most concerning) snipits:
Kluster takes a more structured approach by breaking down projects into manageable stages and has thought through the incentives a little differently. [Eric's comment: 6HS could do a better job of breaking down the projects into clear deliverables. 6HS doesn't (yet?) have any incentive structure besides just having fun and learning.]
we became a destination people loved to bookmark more than they loved to actively visit (our traffic pattern was scarily VC-ish). The limiting reagent in the startup equation is not ideas, but amazing founding teams. [Eric's comment: I agree that the limiter in 6HS being successful is the ongoing care and feeding of the GOOD 6HS's that have gone through the process]
Trying to find people willing or capable to take on the offspring (our outputs) of the CH model was hard and/or incredibly time consuming. [Eric's comment: 6HS has the same problem and will exacerbate this problem the more 6HS's it does if it doesn't figure out how to keep eyeballs on the previous projects.]
Eric
--
E R I C V E A L
206-819-9982 cell