First off, I'd just like to thank you all for the fantastic work done
so far on Sipdroid!
I work for a voip carrier that would like to sponsor some work on
Sipdroid.
Would anyone be interested in a bounty on increased codec support in
Sipdroid?
We would be willing to pay for the development of increased codec
support.
Having G.711 is a good start, but it has too high of bandwidth
requirements to be
really a viable codec for using on the 3G network.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Kaos <punk.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> First off, I'd just like to thank you all for the fantastic work done
> so far on Sipdroid!
> I work for a voip carrier that would like to sponsor some work on
> Sipdroid.
> Would anyone be interested in a bounty on increased codec support in
> Sipdroid?
> We would be willing to pay for the development of increased codec
> support.
> Having G.711 is a good start, but it has too high of bandwidth
> requirements to be
> really a viable codec for using on the 3G network.
> Sounds like a good idea and I hope somebody goes for it!
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Kaos <punk.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > First off, I'd just like to thank you all for the fantastic work done
> > so far on Sipdroid!
> > I work for a voip carrier that would like to sponsor some work on
> > Sipdroid.
> > Would anyone be interested in a bounty on increased codec support in
> > Sipdroid?
> > We would be willing to pay for the development of increased codec
> > support.
> > Having G.711 is a good start, but it has too high of bandwidth
> > requirements to be
> > really a viable codec for using on the 3G network.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:17 AM, lambretta <casalambre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I recall a comment on this list somewhere that on G711 was supported
> by the Android OS but I could be wrong.
> On Sep 2, 4:12 pm, The Kravets Family <ykrav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sounds like a good idea and I hope somebody goes for it!
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Kaos <punk.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > First off, I'd just like to thank you all for the fantastic work done
> > > so far on Sipdroid!
> > > I work for a voip carrier that would like to sponsor some work on
> > > Sipdroid.
> > > Would anyone be interested in a bounty on increased codec support in
> > > Sipdroid?
> > > We would be willing to pay for the development of increased codec
> > > support.
> > > Having G.711 is a good start, but it has too high of bandwidth
> > > requirements to be
> > > really a viable codec for using on the 3G network.
> I recall a comment on this list somewhere that on G711 was supported
> by the Android OS but I could be wrong.
> On Sep 2, 4:12 pm, The Kravets Family <ykrav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sounds like a good idea and I hope somebody goes for it!
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Kaos <punk.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > First off, I'd just like to thank you all for the fantastic work done
> > > so far on Sipdroid!
> > > I work for a voip carrier that would like to sponsor some work on
> > > Sipdroid.
> > > Would anyone be interested in a bounty on increased codec support in
> > > Sipdroid?
> > > We would be willing to pay for the development of increased codec
> > > support.
> > > Having G.711 is a good start, but it has too high of bandwidth
> > > requirements to be
> > > really a viable codec for using on the 3G network.
> The problem is that G.711 isn't an ideal codec for using over 3G. G.
> 729, AMR, Speex, GSM, or iLBC would all be better :)
> And Android has some native support for AMR as well.
> On Sep 2, 7:17 pm, lambretta <casalambre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I recall a comment on this list somewhere that on G711 was supported
> > by the Android OS but I could be wrong.
> > On Sep 2, 4:12 pm, The Kravets Family <ykrav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sounds like a good idea and I hope somebody goes for it!
> > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Kaos <punk.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > First off, I'd just like to thank you all for the fantastic work done
> > > > so far on Sipdroid!
> > > > I work for a voip carrier that would like to sponsor some work on
> > > > Sipdroid.
> > > > Would anyone be interested in a bounty on increased codec support in
> > > > Sipdroid?
> > > > We would be willing to pay for the development of increased codec
> > > > support.
> > > > Having G.711 is a good start, but it has too high of bandwidth
> > > > requirements to be
> > > > really a viable codec for using on the 3G network.
> > The problem is that G.711 isn't an ideal codec for using over 3G. G.
> > 729, AMR, Speex, GSM, or iLBC would all be better :)
> > And Android has some native support for AMR as well.
> > On Sep 2, 7:17 pm, lambretta <casalambre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I recall a comment on this list somewhere that on G711 was supported
> > > by the Android OS but I could be wrong.
> > > On Sep 2, 4:12 pm, The Kravets Family <ykrav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Sounds like a good idea and I hope somebody goes for it!
> > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Kaos <punk.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > First off, I'd just like to thank you all for the fantastic work
> done
> > > > > so far on Sipdroid!
> > > > > I work for a voip carrier that would like to sponsor some work on
> > > > > Sipdroid.
> > > > > Would anyone be interested in a bounty on increased codec support
> in
> > > > > Sipdroid?
> > > > > We would be willing to pay for the development of increased codec
> > > > > support.
> > > > > Having G.711 is a good start, but it has too high of bandwidth
> > > > > requirements to be
> > > > > really a viable codec for using on the 3G network.
> > The problem is that G.711 isn't an ideal codec for using over 3G. G.
> > 729, AMR, Speex, GSM, or iLBC would all be better :)
> > And Android has some native support for AMR as well.
> > On Sep 2, 7:17 pm, lambretta <casalambre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I recall a comment on this list somewhere that on G711 was supported
> > > by the Android OS but I could be wrong.
> > > On Sep 2, 4:12 pm, The Kravets Family <ykrav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Sounds like a good idea and I hope somebody goes for it!
> > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Kaos <punk.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > First off, I'd just like to thank you all for the fantastic work done
> > > > > so far on Sipdroid!
> > > > > I work for a voip carrier that would like to sponsor some work on
> > > > > Sipdroid.
> > > > > Would anyone be interested in a bounty on increased codec support in
> > > > > Sipdroid?
> > > > > We would be willing to pay for the development of increased codec
> > > > > support.
> > > > > Having G.711 is a good start, but it has too high of bandwidth
> > > > > requirements to be
> > > > > really a viable codec for using on the 3G network.
> > > > I recall a comment on this list somewhere that on G711 was supported
> > > > by the Android OS but I could be wrong.
> > > > On Sep 2, 4:12 pm, The Kravets Family <ykrav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Sounds like a good idea and I hope somebody goes for it!
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Kaos <punk.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > First off, I'd just like to thank you all for the fantastic work done
> > > > > > so far on Sipdroid!
> > > > > > I work for a voip carrier that would like to sponsor some work on
> > > > > > Sipdroid.
> > > > > > Would anyone be interested in a bounty on increased codec support in
> > > > > > Sipdroid?
> > > > > > We would be willing to pay for the development of increased codec
> > > > > > support.
> > > > > > Having G.711 is a good start, but it has too high of bandwidth
> > > > > > requirements to be
> > > > > > really a viable codec for using on the 3G network.
