Mappings between reply_of and related_to

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Alexandre Passant

unread,
Aug 27, 2009, 10:50:37 AM8/27/09
to sioc...@googlegroups.com
Hi all,

I've added a mapping between reply_of and related_to in the SIOC Core
Ontology (subproperty of).
The SWAN Discourse Relationship Ontology [1] (mapped to SIOC in [2])
provides a similar mapping with relatedTo and inResponseTo.

Best,

Alex.

[1] http://swan.mindinformatics.org/spec/1.2/discourserelationships.html
[2] http://rdfs.org/sioc/swan

--
Dr. Alexandre Passant
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
:me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .


Olivier G.

unread,
Aug 31, 2009, 12:37:18 PM8/31/09
to sioc...@googlegroups.com
Alexandre Passant a écrit :

> I've added a mapping between reply_of and related_to in the SIOC Core
> Ontology (subproperty of).
> The SWAN Discourse Relationship Ontology [1] (mapped to SIOC in [2])
> provides a similar mapping with relatedTo and inResponseTo.
>

Hi Aleks,

I do not succed to find nor understand what you did in the Ontology
(looking at http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns), but I understand that you wish to
declare reply_of as a subproperty of related_to ?

--
Olivier G.
http://twitter.com/lespacedunmatin
http://www.lespacedunmatin.info/


Alexandre Passant

unread,
Sep 1, 2009, 4:04:39 AM9/1/09
to sioc...@googlegroups.com
HI,

Le 31 août 09 à 17:37, Olivier G. a écrit :

>
> Alexandre Passant a écrit :
>> I've added a mapping between reply_of and related_to in the SIOC Core
>> Ontology (subproperty of).
>> The SWAN Discourse Relationship Ontology [1] (mapped to SIOC in [2])
>> provides a similar mapping with relatedTo and inResponseTo.
>>
>> [1] http://swan.mindinformatics.org/spec/1.2/discourserelationships.html
>> [2] http://rdfs.org/sioc/swan
>
> Hi Aleks,
>
> I do not succed to find nor understand what you did in the Ontology
> (looking at http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns), but I understand that you wish
> to
> declare reply_of as a subproperty of related_to ?

You're right, that's what I meant but I indeed forgot to add it in the
file, and added mappings between related_to and has_reply only.
I fixed that, so both has_reply and reply_of are subproperties of
related_to.

Best,

Alex.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages