Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
SIOC-Dev
Home
+ new post
Pages
Files
About this group
Join this group
Deprecate sioc:name and encourage the use of foaf:name instead
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Stephane Corlosquet  
View profile  
 More options Oct 26, 10:37 pm
From: Stephane Corlosquet <scorlosq...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:37:26 -0400
Local: Mon, Oct 26 2009 10:37 pm
Subject: Deprecate sioc:name and encourage the use of foaf:name instead
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Hi,

I talked to John about this a couple of times and never ended up sending an
email about it. sioc:name is redundant with foaf:name and does not really
provide its own semantics compared to foaf:name. Why do we need it?

Steph.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alexandre Passant  
View profile  
 More options Oct 27, 4:23 am
From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.pass...@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:23:20 +0000
Local: Tues, Oct 27 2009 4:23 am
Subject: Re: Deprecate sioc:name and encourage the use of foaf:name instead
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On 27 Oct 2009, at 02:37, Stephane Corlosquet wrote:

> Hi,

> I talked to John about this a couple of times and never ended up  
> sending an email about it. sioc:name is redundant with foaf:name and  
> does not really provide its own semantics compared to foaf:name. Why  
> do we need it?

Indeed, not sure if much needed, and both are datatype properties with  
an open domain.

However, I'd then simply use rdfs:label rather than foaf:name

Alex.

> Steph.

--
Dr. Alexandre Passant
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
:me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google