Received: by 10.231.11.193 with SMTP id u1mr1510862ibu.7.1298864554519;
        Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:42:34 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: silverstripe-dev@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.231.200.3 with SMTP id eu3ls501415ibb.1.p; Sun, 27 Feb 2011
 19:42:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.179.72 with SMTP id bp8mr284711icb.76.1298864553594;
        Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:42:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.179.72 with SMTP id bp8mr284710icb.76.1298864553584;
        Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:42:33 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <s...@silverstripe.com>
Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (mail-iw0-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wp5si439439icb.1.2011.02.27.19.42.32
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of s...@silverstripe.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.179;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of s...@silverstripe.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=...@silverstripe.com
Received: by iwc10 with SMTP id 10so3050394iwc.38
        for <silverstripe-dev@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.33.195 with SMTP id i3mr5000225ibd.161.1298864552275;
        Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <s...@silverstripe.com>
Received: from sminnee.silverstripe.com (router.silverstripe.com [202.160.48.160])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d10sm4077240ibb.0.2011.02.27.19.42.30
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:42:31 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Subject: Re: [silverstripe-dev] Re: Sapphire / CMS Split
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sam_Minn=E9e?= <s...@silverstripe.com>
In-Reply-To: <7789B680-6E88-4E9B-8385-B69107B51DA3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:42:27 +1300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FE40A47F-B13A-49E9-ADD8-EEA6FB040802@silverstripe.com>
References: <2B5A2EA5-3DFD-421B-9916-E89BC2C98...@silverstripe.com> <f6da9e7d-eb9d-4740-8ef4-6dbc975ee...@u24g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <7789B680-6E88-4E9B-8385-B69107B51...@gmail.com>
To: silverstripe-dev@googlegroups.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)

I have no interest in appeasing masochists.  That said, if there are =
as-yet-unidentified use-cases that we need to consider, now would be the =
time to raise them.

On 28/02/2011, at 3:28 PM, Matt Bower wrote:

> +1
>=20
> I mentioned giving Sapphire custody of LeftAndMain in the split a =
while back so I'm all for it.
>=20
> For any purists out there, another idea is to make Sapphire a pure =
MVC/ORM framework with no UI/UX built-in for masochists who like to =
build everything custom and then have module you can add in that =
includes UI/UX components like LeftAndMain and ModelAdmin for generic =
interface starting points. I'd go for that too to appease said =
masochists.
>=20
> Matt