Good first meeting Nicolaas!
I certainly agree with Nicholaas' sentiments here. Looking for the
module you want or even browsing is cumbersome with multiple pages and
a rather unstructured layout. I'd like to see a more compact, succinct
and scannable layout for modules - currently it's rather impossible to
scan the page without having to dart about and read half of the text.
I'd be more than happy to help with the front-end design as needed.
Re: Sub-modules
You almost want the Spam Protection modules to be sitting underneath
(visually and structurally) Spam Protection itself - they don't just
require the SP module, they are literally extensions of this module
(as opposed to say the way ImageGallery relies on the functionality of
DataObjectManager). This would also group related extensions, so you
would see all the options for spam protection in one place, without
having to scroll through 5 pages. Perhaps we need to be able to set
the 'Parent' module or something, which would allow for distinct
visual styling?
Re: Supported/Unsupported
I never really understood the difference between these. Some
'supported' modules aren't updated as often updated or as stable as
some of the 'unsupported' ones. Perhaps it would be more useful to
know when the last major release of the module was - that way you will
instantly know that, for example, the Gallery module is older than
ImageGallery, without these two seemingly interchangeable modules
being in separate sections. As Nicolaas suggests, badges like new,
updated etc would help distinguish between modules that are receiving
updates and those that aren't. We're all intelligent enough to see the
difference I think.
Re: Relating modules
It seems we have enough modules to warrant a list of sections -
perhaps this is accomplished with a limited set of 'tags' that can be
applied to a module so that the modules can be viewed by 'sections',
if you will. The functionality of Drupal Modules website suggested by
Pete Bacon Darwin seems maybe overkill given the relatively low number
of modules we currently have available? It would be great, but I don't
think the value/development time ratio is high.
</rant>
M :)
On Jul 27, 11:20 am, Nicolaas Thiemen Francken - Sunny Side Up
<
nfranc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi SSers
> During a recent meeting of the WA Chapter of SSers, it was muttered that
> access to modules, themes and widgets onwww.silverstripe.orgcould be