http://startupgenome.cc/pages/summary-of-startup-genome-report-extra-premat
My impression is that internet web 2.0 (or whatever catchphrase du
jour) has been sufficiently derisked that angels are willing to step
in where fools have already failed. Thoughts ...
a) methodology - the new breed of agile lean startups around mobility,
UX, social media has been worked out that obvious failures are easily
weeded out.
b) exit strategy - again with the fast moving low-cost model, angels
can see either a trade-sale or else sufficient positive cash-flow to
make a punt (10-50k seed)
c) Australia - this is a harder question, why Australia and not say UK
or India. Here I'm wandering into speculation so I welcome any hard
facts.
- due to market size, Australia more prone to small scale, even
lifestyle micro-businesses
- legal environment decent, business support adequate, R&D talent
(erratic as in long-tailed but tolerable)
- culture of migrants allows non-locals to take a risk (similar to US)
- platforms out there allow successful punts to rapidly scale (IF
market traction or demand exists)
- pathway to globalisation ... because of the launchpads into
SiliconValley by some Australians, enough know-how from the school of
hard knocks (and US business is full-contact no-holds barred direct
growth-hormone) has filtered back that mentors can coach startups on
how to be an attractive acquisition target
- lifestyle reasons ... people who are good at above point have
decided for whatever personal preference that keeping a foot on this
side of the pond is worth the hassles of flying elsewhere (alas no
help from exorbitant submarine bandwdith costs for telecommuting)
There's an argument that I seen repeated that Australian companies are
small enough that the founders need to cover all the bases (core tech -
> sales), which means when they scale up, they have enough general
experience to be able to pick up specialists unlike larger firms in US/
Europe which are more knowledge silos. However, I'd also point out the
structural problems of the eco-system (again personal view from
obervation)
a) hard to see a Nokia/Ericson, much less Microsoft being purely
indigenous ... lack of breadth of R&D + early trade sales make
startups more likely to be absorbed (see GoogleMaps)
b) still hard to cross the valley of death between early stage success
(<100k) and pre-IPO VC funding (10M+) ... there's a distinct shortage
of local superangels (and syndicates)
c) as a developed country that bounces around banana republic status,
missing out on the biggest untapped global demand segment at the
bottom/middle of pyramid (low - cost, moderate complexity, mixed tech)
which means that cloners out of India/China are eventually going to
cleanup doing a fast follower strategy
d) talent coverage in key areas (UX, multi-core algorithms, soft IP
cores) is sparse to spotty ... Adelaide and to some extent Brisbane
shortage of people will limit growth
e) doesn't work so-well for non-web startups ... anything hardware or
engineering related is still struggling.
Lawrence
http://nz.linkedin.com/in/drllau