New blog post - Returning to Fundamentals - What happens when funding dries up

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Mark Neely

unread,
Oct 17, 2008, 1:02:49 AM10/17/08
to silicon-bea...@googlegroups.com
Hi,
 
I finally got around to doing a new post on my blog, on a topic that I figure will be of interest to most here (http://infolution.com.au/?p=105 and extracted below).
 
No doubt there are different views on this, so keen to discuss/debate.
 
The corollary to my point below is that the current economic climate is a great time to *launch* a new business (there is always money to be made when there is blood on the streets), providing you embrace the changed nature of the business environment in your business plan/model.
 
Regards,
 
Mark
 
 
---8<---

It's has been a fair while since my last post, as I've been grappling with some interesting strategy issues for a client project.

However, I've been having a few conversations with friends and colleagues about the likely impact of the recent economic crisis on the 'Web 2.0' scene. These conversations reminded me of a paper that strategy guru Michael Porter wrote around the time of the first dot.com bubble, which was fairly prescient then, and remains so for the current environment:

It is hard to come to any firm understanding of the impact of the Internet on business by looking at the results to date. But two broad conclusions can be drawn. First, many businesses active on the Internet are artificial businesses competing by artificial means and propped up by capital that until recently had been readily available. Second, in periods of transition such as the one we have been going through, it often appears as if there are new rules of competition. But as market forces play out, as they are now, the old rules regain their currency. The creation of true economic value once again becomes the final arbiter of business success.

(From Strategy and The Internet, Harvard Business Review, March 2001)

We will undoubtedly see considerable carnage among so-called Web 2.0 start-ups (and even some more established entities) as private equity dries out. While that will be painful for those concerned, it will - over the medium term - be good for the industry, as it will weed out businesses with poorly conceived revenue models and customer propositions, and unsustainable business models.

 
-----
Mark Neely
Master Strategist
Infolution Pty Ltd
'Beyond Strategy. Leading Change'
 
e: m...@infolution.com.au
m: +61 (0)412 0417 29
skype: mark.neely
 
Read my blogs --> www.infolution.com.au
                            www.neelyready.com
Connect on LinkedIn --> www.linkedin.com/in/markneely
 

Elias Bizannes

unread,
Oct 17, 2008, 1:18:09 AM10/17/08
to silicon-bea...@googlegroups.com
Great post Mark, and my own thoughts are very much in line with your argument. I can't provide a logical reason for it, but I genuinely feel more excited now about wanting to start something. 

Maybe it's because a lot of my friends and colleagues have approached me with their business plans & ideas. It seems a change in environment creates a change in thinking, not necessarily for the worse. With no corporate bonuses and increased risk of redundancy, people are like: screw it, what have I got to lose?

Basically, it sucks if you're an existing business. It's awesome if you are about to create a business.
--
Elias Bizannes
http://liako.biz
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages