Groups
Groups
Sign in
Groups
Groups
SIGIR Meta
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
SIGIR Meta
1–14 of 14
Mark all as read
Report group
0 selected
Ian Soboroff
2
6/13/11
Conference reviews considered harmful
Looking at Dr. Anderson's homepage, this article appeared in OS Review 2009. On Mon, Jun 13, 2011
unread,
Conference reviews considered harmful
Looking at Dr. Anderson's homepage, this article appeared in OS Review 2009. On Mon, Jun 13, 2011
6/13/11
Eugene Agichtein
, …
Gene Golovchinsky
4
4/26/10
Incentives: reviewer ranking/awards
I think it's probably important to discount authors' assessments when the paper is accepted.
unread,
Incentives: reviewer ranking/awards
I think it's probably important to discount authors' assessments when the paper is accepted.
4/26/10
gvc
4/10/10
On-line rebuttal, first-hand experience
OK, I just finished doing a KDD rebuttal. What a frustrating experience. "In a 2063-character
unread,
On-line rebuttal, first-hand experience
OK, I just finished doing a KDD rebuttal. What a frustrating experience. "In a 2063-character
4/10/10
Fuhr
,
gvc
2
4/6/10
Review criteria - no major changes, please?
I think a broad rethink is necessary. My only quibble with what you're proposing is, I think it
unread,
Review criteria - no major changes, please?
I think a broad rethink is necessary. My only quibble with what you're proposing is, I think it
4/6/10
Ian Soboroff
, …
Fuhr
15
4/1/10
Review criteria
Hi Ian, for me, the question is whether we leave this discussion just with a moral appeal to
unread,
Review criteria
Hi Ian, for me, the question is whether we leave this discussion just with a moral appeal to
4/1/10
Fuhr
3/31/10
Moderator back from vacation
Dear all, some of you might have wondered why theier messages were waiting for approval quite some
unread,
Moderator back from vacation
Dear all, some of you might have wondered why theier messages were waiting for approval quite some
3/31/10
Doug Oard
3/31/10
Some more issues
Thanks to Ian for setting up this discussion forum. I'm pleased to see a few new voices here as
unread,
Some more issues
Thanks to Ian for setting up this discussion forum. I'm pleased to see a few new voices here as
3/31/10
gvc
,
Le Zhao
2
3/29/10
Analysis of issues
gvc wrote: > Point 11. Lots of scientific inquiry requires no statistics. Many of >
unread,
Analysis of issues
gvc wrote: > Point 11. Lots of scientific inquiry requires no statistics. Many of >
3/29/10
Yoelle Maarek
,
Ian Soboroff
2
3/26/10
what about "famous" reviewers
Although I definitely assign reviewers by my feeling of their knowledge, I don't give reviews
unread,
what about "famous" reviewers
Although I definitely assign reviewers by my feeling of their knowledge, I don't give reviews
3/26/10
Ian Soboroff
,
Charles Clarke
3
3/25/10
Griping
Flagging short and/or inappropriate meta-reviews is a job for individual SPC members. It can't be
unread,
Griping
Flagging short and/or inappropriate meta-reviews is a job for individual SPC members. It can't be
3/25/10
Ian Soboroff
3/24/10
Fwd: sigir-meta discussion group
FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ian Soboroff <isob...@gmail.com> Date: Wed,
unread,
Fwd: sigir-meta discussion group
FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ian Soboroff <isob...@gmail.com> Date: Wed,
3/24/10
Ian Soboroff
,
Ryen White
2
3/24/10
Executive...
From http://sigir.org/Officers.html, it seems like it's: sigi...@acm.org -----Original Message--
unread,
Executive...
From http://sigir.org/Officers.html, it seems like it's: sigi...@acm.org -----Original Message--
3/24/10
gvc
3/24/10
Hi all
Thanks, Ian, for setting this up.
unread,
Hi all
Thanks, Ian, for setting this up.
3/24/10
Ian Soboroff
3/24/10
Welcome
This list was born out of a length discussion on the SIGIR 2010 senior PC mailing list about review
unread,
Welcome
This list was born out of a length discussion on the SIGIR 2010 senior PC mailing list about review
3/24/10