Ricardo, After specifying the subject explicitly, you can test validations that are based on a

http://www.ngodinhtruc.com/images/ate.php

Forwarded message: Ok, full code comming up context "as admin" do before do user = Factory(

Of course. It should say: should set_session(:user).to(nil) {@user.id} Curran On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at

The first challenge that I see is the way rails works. It always subclasses ActiveSupport::TestCase

Hey, Apologies for the delay. I'll write a guide on custom macros in shoulda 2.11 soon. -Joe On

I just ran into this today as well. Instance variables created in the setup block of a context are

Hi folks, I have a problem trying to use shoulda with factory_girl when creating a functional test

Hello, I have a test more or less like this: class FormDefinitionTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase

This question was brushed on a year ago in the context to which syntax to use. However with the

Great! On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Francois <fha...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Charles, thanks

Using shoulda, any ideas how to allow blank when having this test: should validate_uniqueness_of(:

I have a rails2 project currently using plain old test-unit and was looking for move to shoulda +

Thanks, Matt. I commented directly on the issue: http://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda/issues/issue/

My 2cents: while upgrading my test suite I replaced all such cases with just it { should

The answer is that the fixtures that get generated for new models in 3.0.0.rc2 screw up shoulda.

I've added the line you mention to my spec_helper.rb but still receive errors: Here is my code:

Ok, I got it! It should be should ("redirect to the root url" ){ redirect_to root_url }

I'm a testing noob trying to get underway with Rails 3 RC. I followed the instructions to install

Thanks for your help. I read some docs and I realized that in integration tests there is not a

That would be enormously helpful for me, at least. I found several articles from 2008 and 2009 that

I will do that On 4 August 2010 17:35, Curran Schiefelbein <c.schie...@gmail.com> wrote:

I am 100% sure and it is happening in several test. I discovered that instead of a redirect I get

sorry I was using test-unit gem with Ruby 1.8.7. It seems that is designed for 1.9 On Aug 4, 4:44 pm,

These two are worth a read: http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/159805987/speculating-with-shoulda http

I'm pretty sure there is something up with my Shoulda configuration. I'm having the same

Doh, I forgot to move over the ActiveRecord::Assertions module. This patch will also be needed: http:

http://robots.thoughtbot.com/post/731871832/this-should-change-your-mind This article answers my

On Jun 18, 2:45 pm, Joe Ferris <joe.r.fer...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Matt, > > For now

How to call a create action on a nested resource with shoulda? The following code does not actual