Yeah, horrible. Is there a better way ?
Happy New Year,
TomZ
services.xml :
<!-- The grouper provisioning service target. -->
<Service id="grouper" xsi:type="psp-grouper-target:GrouperTarget" >
<!-- A <ConfigurationResource/> is required to instantiate the
<Service/>, so supply a do-nothing resource. -->
<ConfigurationResource
file="/edu/internet2/middleware/psp/util/empty-bean.xml"
xsi:type="resource:ClasspathResource" />
</Service>
emtpy-bean.xml :
<beans...>
<bean id="emptyBean"
class="edu.internet2.middleware.psp.util.EmptyBean" />
</beans>
EmptyBean.java :
package edu.internet2.middleware.psp.util;
/**
* Just an empty class.
*/
public class EmptyBean {
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to dev-uns...@shibboleth.net
what do you mean by "a configuration resource is required
to load the service". If I take a look at the
shibboleth-2.0-services.xsd, the element ConfigurationResource of the
abstract service type is declared as 0-to-unbounded.
Does the code itself require it or does your "GrouperTarget" service
type overwrite the schema?
A minor improvement -but still not a nice solution- is to use
java.lang.Object as an empty bean class.
Happy New Year, too
-Halm
Right, minOccurs="0" in the xsd, but in BaseService.java, if there are
no service configurations the context is not loaded :
protected void loadContext() throws ServiceException {
log.info("Loading new configuration for service {}", getId());
if(serviceConfigurations == null || serviceConfigurations.isEmpty()){
setInitialized(true);
return;
}
GenericApplicationContext newServiceContext = new
GenericApplicationContext(getApplicationContext());
...
> Does the code itself require it or does your "GrouperTarget" service
> type overwrite the schema?
No overwrite, the grouper target implements (extends) a Service.
> A minor improvement -but still not a nice solution- is to use
> java.lang.Object as an empty bean class.
Thanks.
https://issues.shibboleth.net/jira/browse/SIDP-533
No hurry.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Chad La Joie <laj...@shibboleth.net> wrote:
> Tom, you can file an issue for this if you'd like. That's something I
> could easily fix in the next patch (whenever that is).
>
> On 1/3/12 10:04 AM, Tom Zeller wrote:
>>> what do you mean by "a configuration resource is required
>>> to load the service". If I take a look at the
>>> shibboleth-2.0-services.xsd, the element ConfigurationResource of the
>>> abstract service type is declared as 0-to-unbounded.
>>
>> Right, minOccurs="0" in the xsd, but in BaseService.java, if there are
>> no service configurations the context is not loaded :
>>
>> protected void loadContext() throws ServiceException {
>> log.info("Loading new configuration for service {}", getId());
>>
>> if(serviceConfigurations == null || serviceConfigurations.isEmpty()){
>> setInitialized(true);
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> GenericApplicationContext newServiceContext = new
>> GenericApplicationContext(getApplicationContext());
>> ...
>>
>>> Does the code itself require it or does your "GrouperTarget" service
>>> type overwrite the schema?
>>
>> No overwrite, the grouper target implements (extends) a Service.
>>
>>> A minor improvement -but still not a nice solution- is to use
>>> java.lang.Object as an empty bean class.